Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bio 1615
Simple rules can guide whether land or ocean-based conservation will best benefit marine
ecosystems.
This article studies what causes the link between sediment runoff and a coastal marine
ecosystem. It then examines the cost-effect of marine and land conservation actions. The
researchers found that marine restoration is the most gainful over time based on the rate that sea
grass meadow expands into a new habitat. This research is important to study because coastal
marine ecosystems are accelerating in deprivation worldwide. Coastal marine ecosystems pose
a particular challenge to environmental managers because they are exposed to threats occurring
both in the ocean and on land. This is information is benefitting society because we need to
conserve our oceans and make sure they are clean so we dont pollute everything in this world.
The researchers are trying to determine which conservation action is the most cost effective.
This experiment mainly took place in Australia in regions that were below dams, which
have the same sediments that the oceans do in that region. They are doing most of their research
on sea grass meadows which are mainly damaged from anchoring. The researchers made models
that represented both seascape and landscape because they are connected by the sediment runoff
from landscapes into the ocean. They made multiple models of each state the sea grass meadows
could be a part of; intact and unprotected, intact and protected, degraded/cleared or undergoing
restoration. They split the models up into their respectable habitats and made sure they each had
enough light, soft sediments and a suitable wave energy based on whatever habitat they were a
part of.
Based on their studies, the researchers found that they sea grass meadow models, they
discovered the investment of $50 million per year for 30 years. Their model was used to measure
the area of habitats from marine restoration and protection. They found that if the model had
light sensitive specials, then the restoration was more cost effective on land. However, that will
not maximize that area of marine habitat immediately because it depends on how fast the marine
ecosystem will recover to expand its new habitat that is healthy. The researchers found that the
most effective way to restore the marine ecosystem is to directly restore it even though the cost is
higher. Of course it depends on the availability of suitable habitats, but if all of the habitats are
unsuitable, then they will have to minimize the sedimentation stress. They found that it takes
about three years for transplanted sea grass to grow and fill in gaps to become a healthy self
sufficient meadow. It also cost about $418,000 to monitor the sea grass for the extended amount
of time. They found that restoring sea grass meadows in smaller quantities is a better way to
maximize efforts to restore marine life than trying to restore it all at once.
With everything said and done, I feel like this is a good way to start restoring the marine
ecosystem. Sometimes it takes a long time to achieve the results that you want. The saying you
eat an elephant one bite at a time relates to this study because the researchers are taking small
parts of sea grass and transporting it to a controlled environment, sustaining it and then putting it
back in the ocean in hopes that it will continue to spread to other parts of the ocean. If they are
able to achieve this, then the sedimentation run off from the land wont affect marine life as
much because there are healthy parts of sea grass to offset it. Obviously this study is still ongoing
because since their projected timeframe is 30 years, but from what they have published so far, it
seems like this experiment is successful in restoring the marine ecosystem, at least in
Queensland, Australia.
Bibliography
Megan Saunders, Michael Bode, Scott Atkinson, Carissa Klein, Anna Metaxas, Jutta Beher, Maria Beger,
Morena Mills, Sylvaine Giakoumi, Vivitskaia Tulloch, Hugh Possingham,. PLOS Biology. 6
September 2017.