Short version of paper: brief summary of topic, methodology, and findings
They help the reader to decide whether or not he/she wants to read the paper When you submit to journals, you may have to submit an abstract before theyll read your full article They offer readers who are going to read the paper a preview as a way to guide their reading Refer back to Reading Strategies workshop: abstracts are a great place to start when you have too many papers to sort through and to prepare yourself to read the article most efficiently They give peer reviewers a preview of the paper theyre about to review Length depends on field/journal, but range will roughly be 100-300 words If youre publishing the abstract, check with the editors or look at the journals guidelines to find out whats expected You can think of it as a compressed introduction: giving your reader as good a sense as possible of what will be in the following paper given the limited space Structure: 5 moves (wont necessarily be in every paper, or in numerical order, but a general overview of what different pieces youll want to put in an abstract) As you write, you can ask yourself what move a particular sentence fulfills, and if it doesnt apply to any of the 5, it might not belong in an abstract 1: background/introduction/situation 2: recent research/purpose 3: methods/materials/subjects/procedures 4: results/findings 5: discussion/conclusion/implications/recommendations Stylistic components to consider Tense Present tense is most common, but past tense is sometimes used to discuss methodology (I.e. We surveyed x people) This will vary by field/discipline, so best way to find out whats expected is to read as many abstracts from your field as possible Citations and specific references to past literature should be limited, or non-existent More common way to refer to past research is to make a general claim, presumably one which your paper responds to/counters (I.e. Many scholars have argued) Not true across the board: depends on your discipline, or even a given topic within a field Limit use of abbreviations or technical terms that most readers are likely to be unfamiliar with If youre writing a journal article abstract, you dont necessarily need to write for general audiences, but you should assume that your readers dont know your subject matter as well as you Your reader will likely be from your field, but will also likely be working in a different research area If you do need to use specific terms or technical language, youll want to explain them to the point where anyone whos moderately well versed in your field will be able to understand Keep in mind that people will be reading this to decide whether or not to read your paper: you want to encourage them Metadiscourse is generally preferable to 1st person Metadiscourse: language about your article (I.e. This paper examines) 1st person is sometimes used to talk about methodology (I.e. We studied x trees) More specific discussion of what goes in the 5 moves (often appear In abstract in numerical order) 1 and 2 can be discussed together; tend to go hand in hand 4 types of opening sentences: Starting with a real-world phenomenon or with standard practice Centered in real world Starting with purpose or objective What your research hopes to accomplish Starting with present researcher action Talk specifically about what your article does Starting with a problem or an uncertainty Issue that your article addresses Linking between 1st and 2nd sentences (potentially between moves 1 and 2) Continuing subject Using same beginning subject for first two sentences Capturing subject Using subject from the end of the sentence New subject Introducing previously unreferenced subject i.e. The objective of this paper is to examine the flapping characteristics of insect wings. For this purpose, we utilized two high-speed video cameras Any of the three can be used, but just be sure that your reader knows what youre referring to if you introduce a new subject It can be easy or tempting to accidentally be unclear with pronouns when introducing a new subject Be extra careful about sentences flowing together No matter which link you use, you generally want to aim for old to new information flow (seen in all of the examples) Move 3: methods Tends to be where you need to compress the most (most details can be added but not necessarily the most important information) Passive voice is often used here (I.e. X inches of rainfall were measured) Most common place to switch to past tense (I.e. If youve already done the research) Move 4: results Generally good to get specific data/results in if possible, because itll be more compelling than broad statements That clause is an effective way to convey results I.e. This research shows that Most common of the 5 moves, and the only one that you pretty much have to use Move 5: conclusions Implications of findings Recommendations Descriptive v. Evaluative Merely describing results as opposed to offering assessment Both can work: depends on the situation Keep in mind that this is usually the last thing your readers will read in the abstract, so you want to leave them with a strong final impression of your research Structured abstract Similar pieces, but moves are labeled (26) I.e. Background: Aim: Method: Results: Conclusion: Improve readability and accessibility, but they only work for papers that fit their mold More common in practice/results oriented fields (I.e. Social sciences and hard sciences) than theoretical fields (humanities) Check w/ professors or journal editors to see whats appropriate for a given situation