Professional Documents
Culture Documents
capacities with 12 V DC input and 230 V AC single phases Table1.2: Technical Specification of Solar PV Modules
with 4 numbers. The Li-ion battery of 12V having 6AH installed on roof of Electrical Engineering Department, JMI
capacity in 20 numbers manufactured by SBD, Ni-cad battery building
of 12 V, 6AH capacity with 20 numbers made by HBL India
Power(Wp)
Voltage(V)
Current(A)
Power (A)
and Lead-acid battery of 12 V and 150 AH capacity with 20
Power (V)
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Voltage at
Current at
Tolerance
numbers made by Maxwell has been installed to store DC
Circuit
Circuit
Short
Open
Type
power generated by the SPV plant and fed to the PCU. Wind
sensor of 0.5 resolutions has been installed to measure the
wind speed and direction. Humidity sensors also installed to
measure the humidity from 0-100% at -500C to +500C
crystalline
manufactured by Met one USA. Data were collected over a
Mono
17.7
21.6
twelve-month period and became the basis of this analysis.
100
2%
5.7
6.3
The tilt angle was chosen as a compromise between the
optimum value, available roof area, and to reduce shading. The
Crystalline
plant was mounted on roof on concrete blocks to prevent
penetration into the existing structure. Here the data of 2nd
Poly
17.7
21.6
September 2015 has been taken to analyze the performance of
100
2%
5.7
6.3
the plant. The details of the main components are tabulated in
table 1.1
Table 1.1: Main components and their specification
Thin plate
17.7
21.6
No components Make
100
2%
5.7
6.3
.
1 Pyranometer 285-2800nm,7-14 CMP11,Kipp
V/W/m2,-40 to & Zonen
+80 0C
2 Wind Sensor 0-75 m/s, 0.5 034B,Metone
resolution ,USA
3 RH/T Sensor 0-100%H,-50 to 083-X-
+50 0C 35,593A,
Met one
,USA
4 PV modules 2 PV arrays of Photon
(Multicrystalline) 500 Wp each energy
system,
Hyderabad
India
5 PV modules 1 PV array of 500 Photon Figure1.Schematic model of Grid connected SPV power
(Monocrystalline) Wp energy system with energy storage device
system,
Hyderabad
India
6 PV modules 1 PV array of 500 Moser Baer
(Thin film) Wp
7 Power 600 VA,input 12 Uniline
conditioning unit V DC,output 230
(PCU) V,AC single
phase,4 Nos.
8 Li-Ion Battery 12V,6AH,20Nos. SBD
9 Ni-Cad Battery 12V,6AH,6Nos. HBL India
10 Lead-acid Battery 12V,150AH,20No Okaya
s.
11 Capacitor Bank 12V,60F Maxwell
12 Data Logger 455B/24 channels Phonix Figure 2.Polycrystalline, monocrystalline and thin film solar
modules are connected on roof top of Electrical engineering
building of JMI
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 STC Temp( 0C )
6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 Isc ( Amp)
0.516218 0.486588 0.448336 0.409444 0.375307 0.342426 0.305814 0.273235 Fill Factor
39.11 38.21 37.52 36.9 35.95 34.86 33.25 31.82 Avg Temp
( 0C )
Pmax
Table1.3 Solar power system 15-minute data of 2nd
10.133 10.19 10.227 10.271 10.331 10.399 10.501 10.591 % Efficiency at Actual Temp.
12:45:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 12:15:00 PM 12:00:00 PM 11:45:00 AM 11:30:00 AM 11:15:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 10:45:00 AM 10:30:00 AM 10:15:00 AM
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
5.292 5.374 5.399 5.405 5.355 5.267 5.097 4.916 4.714 4.558 4.31
21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org
17.17 17.17 17.16 17.15 17.15 17.15 17.14 17.14 17.14 17.15 17.16
0.667568 0.677918 0.680768 0.68117 0.674692 0.663579 0.642105 0.619251 0.593872 0.574459 0.543496
39.52 39.5 39.86 40.29 40.43 40.43 40.48 40.57 40.45 40.2 39.76
International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)
ISSN 2278-6856
90.84268 92.25105 92.63895 92.69358 91.81206 90.29987 87.37762 84.26765 80.81405 78.17238 73.95892
10.108 10.109 10.087 10.06 10.051 10.051 10.048 10.043 10.05 10.066 10.093
Page 133
03:30:00 PM 03:15:00 PM 03:00:00 PM 02:45:00 PM 02:30:00 PM 02:15:00 PM 02:00:00 PM 01:45:00 PM 01:30:00 PM 01:15:00 PM 01:00:00 PM
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
3.67 4.048 4.171 4.486 4.619 5.038 5.065 4.839 4.836 5.179 5.179
21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6
17.12 17.11 17.11 17.12 17.12 17.13 17.14 17.15 17.15 17.16 17.16
0.461691 0.509047 0.524579 0.564244 0.581247 0.634161 0.637991 0.609773 0.609613 0.653062 0.653211
41.64 41.92 41.8 41.63 41.37 41.14 40.65 40.32 40.03 39.75 39.58
9.976 9.959 9.966 9.977 9.993 10.007 10.038 10.058 10.076 10.094 10.104
06:15:00 PM 06:00:00 PM 05:45:00 PM 05:30:00 PM 05:15:00 PM 05:00:00 PM 04:45:00 PM 04:30:00 PM 04:15:00 PM 04:00:00 PM 03:45:00 PM
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
0.129 0.294 0.487 0.788 1.12 1.511 1.891 2.231 2.58 2.938 3.183
21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org
17.27 17.25 17.22 17.2 17.18 17.17 17.16 17.15 17.14 17.13 17.13
0.016392 0.037269 0.061653 0.099624 0.14137 0.190644 0.238503 0.281182 0.324894 0.369909 0.400564
34.94 36.07 37.13 37.99 38.74 39.25 39.75 40.34 40.77 41.03 41.25
International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)
ISSN 2278-6856
2.230599 5.071593 8.389714 13.55681 19.23764 25.9428 32.45544 38.26325 44.21164 50.33727 54.50874
10.394 10.323 10.257 10.203 10.157 10.125 10.094 10.057 10.03 10.014 10.001
Page 134
International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS)
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org
Volume 6, Issue 5, September- October 2017 ISSN 2278-6856
06:30:00 PM
Time Vs Efficiency
0.003642
0.495565
15 minute data of 2nd September 2015
10.461
0.029
33.88
21.6
17.3
10.95
6.3
25
Efficiency
10.9
10.85
10.8
06:45:00 PM
10.75
0.001091
8.02E-06
10.7
10.518
17.32
32.98
21.6
02:15:00 PM
05:15:00 PM
06:15:00 PM
6.3
08:15:00 AM
09:15:00 AM
01:15:00 PM
03:15:00 PM
04:15:00 PM
10:15:00 AM
11:15:00 AM
12:15:00 PM
25
0
07:00:00 PM
0.001092
8.02E-06
10.564
17.33
32.24
21.6
6.3
25
Time
08:15:00 AM
0.273235
37.18178
10.591
2.144
17.34
31.82
700
Performance Evaluation: 600
solar radiation (w/m2)
500
The performance ratio (PR) was calculated to evaluate the
performance of the PV systems as follows: 400
100
% = (1) 300
200
100
Ps is the total output measured energy (kWh) of the system. I is
the irradiance (kWh/m2) A is the area of array; Es is the 0
efficiency of the module. When normalizing with respect to 0 10 20 30
irradiance, the influence of losses is quantified on the rated
output. PR values are normally presented on a monthly or Time (hour)
annual basis. It is common that the PR is higher in lower
temperature months due to the fact that PV systems experience
losses at higher temperatures.
3. Results and conclusion
Time Vs maximum Power
Average Temperature Vs Percentage
100
efficiency
Maximum Power (Watt)
80
15 minute data of 2nd september 2015
60
10.8 40
Percentage Efficiency
10.6 20
10.4 0
10.2
10:15:00 AM
12:15:00 PM
01:15:00 PM
02:15:00 PM
03:15:00 PM
04:15:00 PM
06:15:00 PM
09:15:00 AM
11:15:00 AM
08:15:00 AM
05:15:00 PM
10
9.8
9.6
31.82
39.76
40.48
39.86
39.75
41.14
41.92
40.77
38.74
34.94
36.9
Time
Average Temperature 0C
The SPV plant data has been taken and performance of the [11] A. Allouhia, R. Saadanib, T. Kousksouc, R. Saidurd, A.
plant evaluated. Following Results have been concluded. Jamila, M. Rahmoune, Grid-connected PV systems
(i) The performance ratio varies between 0.7 and installed on institutional buildings: Technology
0.8. comparison, energy analysis and economic performance
(ii) The maximum power generation is at 12:00 noon. Energy and Buildings, volume 130, pp. 188201, 2016.
[12] Rameen AbdelHady, Modeling and simulation of a micro
(iii) Efficiency is maximum at the both end of the day
grid-connected solar PV system Water Science, volume
and minimum at 41.92 0C 31, pp.110,2017.
(iv) During high temperature the efficiency is lower. [13] Changsheng Li, Haiyu Wanga, Hong Miao, Bin Ye, The
(v) Solar radiation is highest in the mid day and economic and social performance of integrated photovoltaic
power generation is also highest but the and agricultural greenhouses systems: Case study in China
efficiency is lower in the fact that the power loss Applied Energy, volume 190, pp. 204212, 2017.
is more at high temperature. [14] Lee Wai Chong, Yee Wan Wong, Rajprasad Kumar
Rajkumar, Dino Isa, An optimal control strategy for
standalone PV system with Battery Super capacitor Hybrid
References: Energy Storage System Journal of Power Sources, volume
[1] Micheli D, Alessandrini S, Radu R, Casula J. Analysis of 331, pp. 553-565,2016.
the outdoor performance and efficiency of two grid [15] Jyri Salpakari , Peter Lund , Optimal and rule-based
connected photovoltaic systems in northern Italy Energy control strategies for energy flexibility in buildings with
Convers Manage,volume 80,pp.436445,2014. PV Applied Energy, volume 161, pp.425436,2016.
[2] Sirisamphanwong C, Ketjoy N. Impact of spectral [16] A. Al-Otaibi, A. Al-Qattan, F. Fairouz, A. Al-Mulla,
irradiance distribution on the outdoor performance of
Performance evaluation of photovoltaic systems on
photovoltaic system under Thai climatic conditions Renew
Kuwaiti schools rooftop Energy Conversion and
Energy, volume 38,pp.6974, 2012. Management, volume 95, pp. 110119, 2015.
[3] Kymakis E, Kalykakis S, Papazoglou T. Performance
analysis of a grid connectedphotovoltaic park on the island
of Crete Energy Convers Manage, volume 50, pp.433
8,2009.
[4] Raugei M, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S. Life cycle assessment and
energy-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules: CdTe
and CIS compared to poly-Si Energy, volume 32, pp.1310-
18, 2007.
[5] Makrides G, Zinsser B, Phinikarides A, Schubert M,
Georghiou G. Temperature and thermal annealing effects
on different photovoltaic technologies Renew Energy,
volume 43, pp.40717,2012.
[6] A. Shuklaa, Karunesh Kanta, Atul Sharmaa, Pascal Henry
Biwoleb, Cooling methodologies of photovoltaic module
for enhancing electrical efficiency: A review Solar Energy
Materials & Solar Cells, volume 160, pp. 275286, 2017.
[7] Kalogirou S, Agathokleous R, Panayiotou G. On-site PV
characterization and the effect of soiling on their
performance Energy, volume 51, pp.43946, 2013.
[8] Lombarda, L.P., Ortizb, J., Poutb, C. A review on
buildings energy consumption information Energy
Build,volume 40,number 3,pp. 394398,2008.
[9] Ram Joshi, Maharshi Pathak, Anupam K Singh,
Designing Self-Energy Sufficient Buildings in India
Energy Procedia, volume 57, pp. 3110 3119,2014.
[10] Daniela Mewesa, Paulo Monsalvea, Isabella Gustafssona,
Belkiz Hasana, Jennifer Palna, Ryo Nakakidoa, Erika
Capobianchia, Benjamin sterlunda, Evaluation Methods
for Photovoltaic Installations on Existing Buildings at the
KTH Campus in Stockholm, Sweden Energy Procedia
volume 115, pp. 409422, 2017.