Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V539
How Do We Manage Pain in Cattle Effectively?
Hans Coetzee, BVSc, Cert CHP, PhD, MRCVS, DACVCP
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan,
KS, USA
It is interesting to note that while carprofen, ketoprofen, flunixin meglumine, tolfenamic acid, meloxicam,
and xylazine are labeled for pain control in England, no products are labeled for pain control in food
animals in the United States. Flunixin meglumine is labeled for control of pyrexia associated with bovine
respiratory disease, endotoxemia, and acute bovine mastitis, and also for inflammation in endotoxemia.
Aspirin is not approved by the FDA/CVM for use in food animals, although there are numerous
products with a “label” indicating use in food animals. We also may resort to phenylbutazone, steroids,
barbiturates, or various anesthetics. This proceedings focuses on selected compounds and regimens used
in addressing pain and inflammation in food animals. We will start with a brief overview of how anti
inflammatory drugs work.
OVERVIEW
Glucocorticoids inhibit the production of inflammatory molecules such as cytokines and adhesion
molecules. These enable inflammatory cells to leave the blood stream and enter the site of inflammation.
Glucocorticoids also maintain membrane integrity and exert a host of effects of protein, lipid and
carbohydrate metabolism.
Dexamethasone (Azium Solution, Schering Plough) and Isoflupredone acetate (Predef, Pfizer) are
the most widely used glucocorticosteroids in production animal medicine. Isoflupredone is described as
having glucocorticoid potency 10 times greater than hydrocortisone but about 1/3 the potency of
dexamethasone. Isoflupredone is unique among these compounds as it does not cause abortion in
pregnant cattle at any stage of gestation. The drug does however have some mineralocorticoid activity
and repeated high doses have been associated with electrolyte imbalances such as hypokalemia.
Glucocorticosteroids prevent arachidonic acid release by stabilizing cell membranes and inducing
lipocortin production. Lipocortin prevents phospholipase A2 from encountering cell membrane
associated arachidonic acid. This reduces the availability of precursors for prostaglandin production.
Glucocorticoids need to be administered early in the course of disease for maximum efficacy. Arachidonic
acid release occurs early in the cascade of events following a traumatic incident or endotoxin exposure.
Once arachidonic acid is released, lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase have the substrate required to form
inflammatory intermediates.
Glucocorticoid drugs are also known to inhibit the production of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) which
produces inflammatory prostaglandin from arachidonic acid. Steroids have not been observed to inhibit
COX-1, a constitutive enzyme which is responsible for producing “housekeeping” prostaglandins in the
kidney and gastric mucosa. Steroids should therefore NOT be considered analgesic drugs!
Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: The primary mode of action of NSAIDs currently used in
food animals is to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins (PG) and thromboxanes through the inhibition
of cyclo-oxygenase (COX). Cyclo-oxygenase is composed of 2 isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is the
“housekeeping” isoform that mediates the formation of constitutive prostaglandins. PG’s generated by
COX-1 are constantly present, providing homeostasis. These include protection of the GIT mucosa,
hemostasis and protection of the kidney against hypotension. COX-2 is the highly “inducible” isoform
that is dramatically up regulated in the presence of inflammation.
All NSAIDs that are commonly used in production animals inhibit both COX isoforms and
consequently the formation of PG E2 in the brain, which effectively reduces fever. Aspirin and Flunixin
meglumine are the only NSAIDs labeled for use in cattle in the United States. Other compounds that are
approved in Europe and which may become available for use in food animals over the next 5 to 10 years
include carprofen, meloxicam, ketoprofen and tolfenamic acid.
Analgesia during castration, dehorning, and tail docking: It is easy to see how this subject would
be considered as a moral issue by the general public. The AVMA position statement on animal welfare
supports the reduction or elimination of pain during castration and dehorning, but does not use the
words analgesia or anesthesia.1 “The AVMA supports the use of procedures that reduce or eliminate the
pain of dehorning and castrating of cattle. These procedures should be completed at the earliest age
practicable. Research in developing improved techniques for painless, humane castration and dehorning
is encouraged. In addition, it is recommended that viable alternatives to castration and dehorning be
developed and applied.” The AVMA does state that flank ovariectomies performed without anesthesia
are inhumane.
Resistance to requiring injectable analgesia for routine castration and dehorning is largely based on
time and logistical issues. However, a recent study evaluating novel methods of analgesia for tail docking
in lambs demonstrated that castrating by banding in 1–2 day old lambs required an average of 28 seconds
without analgesia and 68 seconds when an injectable local anesthetic was administered by jet-injector.2
While the United States has not followed other countries in legislating the use of local anesthesia during
castration and dehorning, it is appropriate for the veterinary profession to pursue practical, rapid, and
effective methods for the relief of pain related to these procedures. The author is aware of practicing
veterinarians that have adopted local anesthesia regimens for these procedures.
It has been suggested that a surgical stimulus such as castration in calves is so brief that little
difference can be observed or measured between animals having or not having local anesthetic applied.3
However, alleviating pain associated with surgical castration by administration of local anesthesia
increased weight gain in cattle for 35 days following castration.4 This suggests that alleviating acute pain
at the time of castration may have economic benefit.5 Ketoprofen, a NSAID analgesic not approved for
use in cattle in the U.S., has been shown to reduce acute plasma cortisol response in cattle following
administration at the time of castration. Giving both a local anesthetic and intravenous ketoprofen before
surgery-cut castration was found to virtually abolish the post-surgery cortisol response.6,7 Ketoprofen
given alone was also found to reduce the plasma cortisol response to Burdizzo castration more effectively
than a local anesthetic or an epidural.7 Similar studies examining NSAIDs that are approved for use in
food-producing animals in the USA have not been conducted. Furthermore, all these studies examining
the efficacy of analgesic drugs in farm animals fail to report associated plasma drug concentrations
essential for designing efficacious analgesic regimens.
Some of the parameters described above may be useful to allow us to determine the efficacy of
analgesics in food animals.
A reasonable withdrawal time for opiates in cattle of at least 48 hours has been suggested in the
literature.16
Twenty-two male beef cattle were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. 1)
Uncastrated, untreated control (n=4), 2) Castrated, placebo treated control (n=6), 3) Castrated, IV xylazine
(0.05 mg/ kg) and ketamine (0.1 mg/kg) (n=6), 4) Castrated, intravenous xylazine (0.05 mg/ kg) (n=6).
Calves were castrated with a Henderson castration tool and blood samples were collected at 3, 10, 20, 30,
40, 50 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours thereafter. Ketamine, norketamine and xylazine
were determined by LC-MS-MS and substance P (SP) and cortisol were determined by use of competitive
and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays, respectively.
The volume of the central compartment (Vc = 132.82 ± 68.23 mL/kg), distribution clearance (CLD =
15.49 ± 2.56 mL/min/kg), volume of the peripheral compartment (VT = 257.05 ± 41.65 mL/kg) and
ketamine clearance by the formation of the norketamine metabolite (CL2M = 8.56 ± 7.37 mL/kg/min) were
estimated. Plasma ketamine, norketamine and xylazine concentrations were associated with mitigation of
plasma cortisol and SP response.
MELOXICAM
We conducted a study to investigate the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of meloxicam in
ruminant calves. Six Holstein calves (145–170 kg) received either meloxicam IV at 0.5 mg/kg or oral
meloxicam at 1 mg/kg in a randomized cross-over design with a 10-day washout period. Plasma samples
collected up to 96 hours post-administration were analyzed by LC-MS followed by noncompartmental
pharmacokinetic analysis. A mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 3.10 ug/mL (Range: 2.64–3.79
ug/mL) was recorded at 11.64 hours (Range: 10–12 hours) with a half-life (T ½ λz) of 27.54 hours (Range:
19.97–43.29 hours) after oral meloxicam administration. The bioavailability (F) of oral meloxicam
corrected for dose was 1.00 (Range: 0.64–1.66). These findings indicate that oral meloxicam administration
could be an effective and convenient means of providing long-lasting analgesia to ruminant calves.
REFERENCES
1. American Veterinary Medical Association Animal Welfare Position Statements (updated 2004). Accessed 3-15-04
at http://www.avma.org/policies/animalwelfare.asp.
2. French NP, Wall R, Morgan KL. Lamb tail docking: a controlled field study of the effects of tail amputation on
health and productivity. Vet Rec. 1994; 134(18):463–7.
3. Anderson DE, Muir WW. Pain management in cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim. 2005:21, 623–635.
4. Fisher AD, Crows MA, Alonso de la Varga ME, et al. Effect of castration method and the provision of local
anesthesia on plasma cortisol, scrotal circumference, growth and feed intake of beef bulls. J. Anim. Sci.
1996;74,2336–2343.
5. Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ. The welfare significance of the castration of cattle: A review. New Zealand Veterinary
Journal. 2005;53(5),271–278.
6. Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ, Todd SE, et al. Effects of local anaesthesia or local anaesthesia plus a non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drug on the acute cortisol response of calves to five different methods of castration. Research in
Veterinary Science 2002;73(1),61–70.
7. Ting STL, Earley B, Hughes JML, et al. Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine
and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth,
and behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81,1281–1293.
8. De Backer P, Braeckman R, Belpaire F, et al. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of phenylbutazone in the cow.
J Vet Pharmacol Therap 1980:3:29–33.
9. Williams RJ, Smith JA, Boudinot FD, et al. Pharmacokinetics of phenylbutazone given intravenously or orally in
mature Holstein bulls. Am J Vet Res 1990:3;367–370.
10. FDA/CVM Update. FDA order prohibits extralabel use of phenylbutazone in certain dairy cattle. February 28,
2003. Accessed at http://www.fda.gov/cvm/CVM_Updates/buteup.htm on 8/1/07.
11. Gingrich GA, Baggot JD, Yeary RA. Pharmacokinetics and dosage of aspirin in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc
1975:167:945–948.
12. Damian P, Craigmill AL, Riviere JE. Extralabel use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Am Vet Med Assoc
1997:211;860–861.
13. Coetzee JF, Gehring R, Bettenhausen AC, et al. Mitigation of plasma cortisol response in bulls following
intravenous sodium salicylate administration prior to castration. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and
Therapeutics. Accepted April 2007. In press.
14. Miesner M. Chemical restraint in food animals: Using drugs to make patient and veterinarian lives more
enjoyable. In Proceedings, 69th Annual Conference for Veterinarians, June 3–6, 2007, Manhattan, KS. PP. 213–218.
15. Craigmill AL, Rangel-Lugo M, Damian P, et al. Extralabel use of tranquilizers and general anesthetics. J Am Vet
Med Assoc. 1997:211, 302–304.
16. Papich MG. Drug residue considerations for anesthetics and adjunctive drugs in food-producing animals. In,
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 1996:12(3), 693–705.