Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zach Sisler
ENGL 2089
17 October 2017
In a world of exponential advancements and a never faltering global economy, the United
States seems to always be on top. But how much longer can we keep this balancing act up?
Every day, workers in our industries retire and are replaced with new younger workers. Usually
these newcomers are fresh out of a University or degree-granting institution. At the root of our
national economy is our education system. Early education (K-12) is essentially the foundation
for the future generations of workers. The concepts they learn both educationally and about the
world itself during this period of their lives shape who they will become and what abilities they
might be capable of attaining later on. The United States Government crams the most money
into its education system, and has the least results to show for it internationally, by a longshot.
So, as many puzzled congressmen and equally qualified monkeys alike may have scratched their
heads in contemplation of: why does our education system perform so poorly compared to others
around the globe? In the following paragraphs I will break down what I have found to be the
main causes of our countrys poor education results through my research, and provide a brief
outline of what must be done to correct these factors. With some reallocations of funding, a few
changes in our curriculums and school cultures and slight teaching modifications, our education
Standardization
Although President Bush had good intentions with the No Child Left Behind Act, he
started a wave of standardization and performance based assessments that still cause issues to
this date. Students were reduced to numbers and scores, and schools that had low student
performance on these tests were penalized with decreased funding and even the possibility of
being shut down. These sanctions put immense pressure on teachers, principals, and virtually all
school employees who wished to keep their job security. Waves of scandals swept across the
country, as test administrators cheated in many ways such as helping students with answers and
even altering test scores. Generally when a student does poorly on a test, it is an indicator of
their surroundings. That could be home life, or a poor educational setting. No matter how good
a teacher may be, they cannot force a student to learn or perform well academically. Punishing
schools with poor student performance might make sense in theory, but not in reality. Schools
that perform poorly are almost always the ones that need more funding and attention! As former
Governor of Georgia Roy Barnes said: If the goal of the No Child Left Behind Act is to ensure
that all children meet state standards, then allowing large numbers of the most disadvantaged
children to fall between the cracks is unacceptable. Not all students in America, a single state, a
single school district, or even a single town are in the same socioeconomic groups. Trying to
standardize performance and education on a national level is a disaster and highlights the idea
that big federal government should stay out of the educational realm.
According to the publication The Condition of Education 2017 by the National Center for
Educational Statistics, almost 50% of public school funding in the United States in 2015 came
from the local areas surrounding these schools. As can be assumed, this means that the amount
Sisler 3
of funding between some schools in intercity areas and areas of poverty can vary drastically.
There are some balances in place in certain states to help correct this, but they are mostly
ineffective and not widespread enough to make a large impact. Some schools in wealthy areas
end up spending more on their sports programs than schools in the projects and areas of
disadvantage have available for new materials and technology. Rothstein (2004) found that the
actual school spending per pupil from 1996-97 ranged from $9,667 in New Jersey to only $3,704
in Mississippi. This kind of standardization in testing and funding has undeniably hindered our
education system, and widened the divide that must now be bridged.
According to James S. Coleman in The Coleman Report, the two biggest indicators of a
childs educational performance are family life and peers. In 2017, over 50% of American
children will see their parents become divorced or separated. Approximately 43% of these
children will grow up without a father figure. It is not news that America has been going
through large cultural and political changes in recent times, and division economically, racially,
and socially has been growing. Drug problems are also devastating many families, with
overdoses rising all over the country. The cultural divide between parents and their teenagers
has arguably never been greater in human history than it is now. Many children dont grasp the
value of their education and performance without parent involvement and motivation. American
high schools especially have been transformed into a cultural fixture: less known for education
and more known for football, cliques of hormonal teenagers, bullying, and stoners. The
American society is sensitive of and very hesitant to try and tackle these issues, and it is showing
It is a pretty well-known fact in our day and age that students learn best when
engaged. Take a trip to a local college and sit in on a lecture in a big lecture hall odds are less
than 15 minutes into the class you can look around and see at least a handful of students with
their heads on their desks taking a boredom induced midday snooze. America has some of the
best STEM teachers, they really know their stuff. However, a lot of them are focused upon
research rather than teaching, or lack the proper teaching skills to translate their knowledge to
students in a way the students can master the advanced topics and most importantly understand
the concepts behind them and how they can be applied. Application teaching is something that is
catching on in our modern society, and for good reason. The days of students just memorizing
terms and mindlessly putting numbers into a formula and spitting out an answer they hope is
right must come to an end. Students need to learn how to fail, to recognize why they failed, and
to take that knowledge and use it to succeed with another attempt. A future employer probably
doesnt care if you got an A+ or a C- in your 12th grade calculus class. They care that you can
prove you are competent to apply things youve learned to the industry, that you can solve
problems quickly in a way that satisfies all parties, and that you are willing to grow and learn as
you stay in the company. Learning new concepts and ideas is always beneficial, there is no bad
knowledge. However what our students learn must be targeted and applicable to the fields that
Conclusion
The ingredients for a revolutionary education system are all already present in the United
States. The funding, teachers, technology and students are all prepared for the next big jump,
lying in wait in our 50 states (and other territories). With the reallocation and effective
Sisler 5
distribution of our funds and technology, we could improve disadvantaged schools immensely.
No more students from any background, race, or socioeconomic group should fall through the
cracks of the system. If family life and everyday quality of life could be improved through a
more comprehensive education program, our graduation rates would rise and thus our industries
would be provided with more qualified and educated workers. With a slight modernization of
our teachers presentation methods students could begin to learn more efficiently, and as a result
would be enabled to learn more material in a more applicable fashion in less time.