Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rubric Assignment
EDEE 355
Christina Delaney
c) Types of rubrics and descriptions: holistic vs. analytic, general vs. task-specific
- According to Mertler (2001), there are two types of rubrics: holistic rubrics and analytic rubrics. The
choice of rubrics can be made whether you are using to assess the criteria at a time or together.
2) Specify observable attributes that you want to see and you dont want to see. For example, specify the
characteristics, skills and/or behaviors.
3) Identify ways to describe different level of performance. For example, how will you describe attributes
that are average, above-average and below-average?
4)a. For holistic rubrics, write a thorough description in each attribute (level) of performance.
b. For analytic rubrics, write a thorough description in each individual attribute of each criteria.
5)For both holistic and analytic rubrics, make sure that the levels range from excellent to poor.
6)Tip: Collect samples of student work that exemplify each level. These will help you in the
future when designing rubrics. (p.5)
- Mertler (2001) also made a graph of a summarization of these steps (p.6).
- Able to provide individualized and constructive feedback to the students (Andrade, 2004).
- Below image is an example of a good rubric. It contains 3 to 5 criteria, each criterion is not task-specific,
and the description of each level is well-developed. Furthermore, the rubric is easy to read and easy to
understand.
Name
Picture
Coloring
Writing
Rubric courtesy of Samantha Francis (owlbeteachingyou.blogspot.com)
I have chosen a rubric for kindergarten class which I am in for my third field experience. My
cooperating teacher has told me that there is no requirement to use rubrics in a kindergarten
classroom. However, I believe that if rubrics are made with visuals, young students will feel
comfortable with them. In this rubric I have chosen, each criterion requires specific skill. For
example, coloring requires the students fine motor skills. Popham (1997) argues that a good rubric
contains criteria that evaluate specific skills, not tasks. Instead of using the word picture as my
second criterion, I would use drawing. I want to put emphasis that it is a skill that is being
evaluated. The rubric is ranged from one star to 4 stars. I believe that students can distinguish from
excellent work and poor work. Each level has models to exemplify the level of performance
accordingly. Each description is appropriate and easy to understand for kindergarten students. The
description is not worded. Instead, each description is drawn in order for young kids to understand
what is expected from them. However, it would be difficult to use this rubric for diverse group. For
instance, I cant assess by using the same rubric for students with disabilities. Students who are color
6
blind cannot get the same result as what is shown under 4 stars for coloring. Each criterion is a skill
which can be developed gradually. For instance, students may have a difficult time writing their
name. Over time, students will gradually know how to write their name properly. Kindergarten
students must have an understanding of rubrics before its given to them. They might produce their
work as exactly the same as what is shown on this rubric.
According to my findings, creating a rubric that is right for every student requires lots of efforts.
From holistic to analytic rubrics, and from general to task-specific descriptions, I would have to choose
the right one for each assignment. Mertler (2001) argues that analytic rubrics contain multiple criteria
and different levels which means I can use this type of rubric to provide detailed feedbacks to my
students. I believe that I can utilize analytic rubrics from kindergarten to grade 6. As seen above,
teachers can present criteria through drawing thus making the rubric visual for kindergarten students.
Furthermore, my goal is to make students feel comfortable with using rubrics. before scoring my
students with rubrics, I will let them do self-assessment. This way, the students can train themselves to
produce work that meets high level of criteria. As Popham (2001) states, Rubric developers should
remember that their efforts should guide teachers, not overwhelm them.(p. 74) I will visually present
different examples of work to score together with my students. I believe that if I show my students how
they are going to be assessed, the quality of their work would increase.
Lastly, I want to show my students no surprising marks. In order to do so, I will give my students
feedback with a rubric. They will be expected to use the feedback to improve on their work. They will
be assessed again using the same rubric, and it will be their final grade. I want to encourage my students
to make improvements; it will also boost their self-esteem if they see their improved result. I will follow
References
Airasian, P. W., & Russell, M. K. (2008). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (6th ed.).
Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading.
ASCD.
Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research &
Popham, W. J. (1997). What's wrong- and what's right- with rubrics. Association for Supervision and