Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORG
International Journal
of
Learning, Teaching
And
Educational Research
p-ISSN: 1694-2493
e-ISSN: 1694-2116
Vol.3 No.1
PUBLISHER International Journal of Learning, Teaching and
London Consulting Ltd Educational Research
District of Flacq
Republic of Mauritius
www.ijlter.org The International Journal of Learning, Teaching
and Educational Research is an open-access
Chief Editor journal which has been established for the dis-
Dr. Antonio Silva Sprock, Universidad Central de semination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the
Venezuela, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of field of education, learning and teaching. IJLTER
welcomes research articles from academics, ed-
Editorial Board
Prof. Cecilia Junio Sabio ucators, teachers, trainers and other practition-
Prof. Judith Serah K. Achoka ers on all aspects of education to publish high
Prof. Mojeed Kolawole Akinsola quality peer-reviewed papers. Papers for publi-
Dr Jonathan Glazzard cation in the International Journal of Learning,
Dr Marius Costel Esi Teaching and Educational Research are selected
Dr Katarzyna Peoples through precise peer-review to ensure quality,
Dr Christopher David Thompson
originality, appropriateness, significance and
Dr Arif Sikander
Dr Jelena Zascerinska readability. Authors are solicited to contribute
Dr Gabor Kiss to this journal by submitting articles that illus-
Dr Trish Julie Rooney trate research results, projects, original surveys
Dr Esteban Vzquez-Cano and case studies that describe significant ad-
Dr Barry Chametzky vances in the fields of education, training, e-
Dr Giorgio Poletti learning, etc. Authors are invited to submit pa-
Dr Chi Man Tsui
Dr Alexander Franco
pers to this journal through the ONLINE submis-
Dr Habil Beata Stachowiak sion system. Submissions must be original and
Dr Afsaneh Sharif should not have been published previously or
Dr Ronel Callaghan be under consideration for publication while
Dr Haim Shaked being evaluated by IJLTER.
Dr Edith Uzoma Umeh
Dr Amel Thafer Alshehry
Dr Gail Dianna Caruth
Dr Menelaos Emmanouel Sarris
Dr Anabelie Villa Valdez
Dr zcan zyurt
Assistant Professor Dr Selma Kara
Associate Professor Dr Habila Elisha Zuya
VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1 March 2014
Table of Contents
Study of the Conceptions Related to Learning of Complex Concepts: The Case of the Ecosystem ............................ 1
Lamjed Messoussi, Andr Giordan and Mohamed Hdi El Aouni
A Comparison of Experimental Designs for Assessment and Research in Higher Education ................................... 14
Jack T. Tessier, Nana-Yaw Andoh, Kristin DeForest, Matthew W. Juba, Akira Odani, John J. Padovani, Elizabeth F. Sova,
and Lisa M. Tessier
Designing Teaching Methods in Curriculum of Irans Higher Education based on Development of Social Capital
................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21
Forouzan Tonkaboni, Alireza Yousefy and Narges Keshtiaray
Autocratic and Participative Coaching Styles and Its Effects on Students Dance Performance .............................. 32
Desiree B. Castillo, Martina Alexandria V. Balibay, Jhuzel M. Alarcon, Justine M. Picar, Raniel R. Lampitoc, Ma.
Crizandra Baylon
Impact of Teacher-Gender on Primary Students Achievement: A Case Study at Bangladesh Standpoint ............. 45
Dr. Kazi Enamul Hoque and Mosa Fatema Zohora
Lamjed Messoussi
University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia
Andr Giordan
University of Geneva, Switzerland
Introduction
Ecology, this 'science of ecological systems' as described by specialists, has been
recognized by (Haeckel, 1866) as the science of the relationships between organisms
and the surrounding world, (Dajoz, 1983) it was defined as the science of knowledge
of the existence of interactions for (Buican, 1997) it was the science of the relationships
with the environment. Its history dates back to nearly 150 years, introduced many
inputs (concepts, methodology) to enable the understanding of the ecosystems, their
diversity, their structures and their functioning. According to conventional physics,
the second law of thermodynamics known as Carnot's principle states that any system
evolves in the direction of greater disorder. This principle is used to measure the
degree of disorder of a system at a microscopic level and applies only to closed
systems. Discoveries in biology have shown that any open system naturally evolves
into a more complex structure. The interaction "system - environment" can overcome
this apparent contradiction. In the case of the ecosystem, emerging concepts as
organization, order and Exchange, have been linked to translate a tangle and a layout
of connection, paving the way for the complexity, recognized in other areas such as
biology, sociology, economics, urbanization, organizations, etc. The complexity of
2
In the field of education, the learning of the ecological concepts should, with
references to the prescribed lead to understand the complexity of the ecosystem.
However, do teachers have a conceptual approach, method, tools and techniques
sufficiently adequate for shaping and addressing this complexity?
The premises
The relationship between the systemic approach and the concept of system were
reported by many specialists. De Rosnay (1975) considers that the systemic approach is
based on the concept of system." "This term often vague and ambiguous, [is] yet used today in
a growing number of disciplines because of its power of unification and integration. Since the
last century, Bertalanffy (1973) had sought to identify, in the General systems theory, the
common concepts of system and its properties, and proposed to define a system as ' a
complex of elements in interaction".". Taking this point of view, De Rosnay (1975) defines
a system by a collection of elements in dynamic interaction, organized around an objective .
Sketching the history of some of these definitions, Durand (1979) adds other
definitions of Linguistics, relating them either to a classic rationalist approach, or to
the systemic approach. This set of definition highlights the concept of the system
which can be summarized as follows (it is not an arithmetic sum, but the
characteristics of the interrelationships between elements):
Macy conferences, organized in New York by the 'Josiah Macy Foundation' at the
initiative of Warren McCulloch neurologist had met at regular intervals from 1942 to
1956 a group of specialists from various scientific backgrounds (mathematicians,
logicians, anthropologists psychologists and economists) and their work has been the
source of cybernetics and cognitive science, areas much used to the emergence of
systems. Until then scientific research based on the method of Descartes advocated
dividing and isolating each item or variable to be studied separately. With cybernetics
it is, not to deal with elements taken in isolation, but to seek links between these
elements, particularly through feedback. Already since the XXVII century, the
complementarily between the part and the whole was a main concern. Pascal (1669), in
his thoughts, part I, art. 6, said the flame cannot exist without air: therefore, to find the
one you need to know each other [...] I would not know the parts without knowing the
whole, nor to know the whole without knowing the specific parts ".
The work of De Rosnay (1975); Walliser (1977); Le Moigne (1983); Durand (1979);
Giordan & Souchon (1991, 2008); Donnadieu & Karsky (2002), have helped to
conceptualize the systemic approach, its methods, its areas of application and its
analysis tools. Aracil (1984) has described, for its part, the evolution of the systems in
his Introduction to the dynamics of systems and even indicated that this dynamics was
based on models such as theorized and symbolized by Forrester.
Centers of
Flow circulating decision
between reservoirs set of
element in
dynamic
interaction
Set formed of
whole
Limits and
elements
borders in the
environment
System
concept
Slightly present in the literature, the term systemic approach tends to refer to an
educational dimension versus "systemic approach". In our case, we are actually
applying the ecosystem approach in the classroom, in order to build an instruction
based on scientific concepts functioning in system.
This study chose to start with the main players in the process of teaching / learning:
teacher. Analysis of their designs, about the concept of system, could provide
information on their modes of reasoning. Similarly, analysis of educational tools
selected by the teachers for the teaching of the concept of ecosystem following training
on the systems approach can provide information on the degree of understanding of
systems thinking in the learning of complex concepts.
Beyond knowledge of the concept of system alone, this study sought to see the degree
of influence related to this concept in the process of learning and especially if the only
apprehension of systemic thought enough for learning of complex concepts. Works
such as those of Giordan & Souchon (2008) developed the systems approach as a
conceptual framework for the study of complex ecological concepts, that of sustainable
development. Morin (1990) stresses that a disciplinary barrier prevents the assumption
of multidimensionality. Relevant training and a practical guide available to teacher
teaching resources to integrate the aspect of 'complexity' in learning.
5
Research on the conceptions of the teachers in connection with the systemic approach,
the following research questions have been put forward in the below statements:
1. Doesnt the notion of system appear in the teachers concepts as a limited frame
with a structural dominance?
2. An education based on a teaching approach that is systemic allows a better
understanding of the complexity of the ecosystem concept? A complementary
training, predominantly "functional" would be more relevant?
The methodology was of a qualitative type, it relies on semi-structured questionnaires.
The structuring of the results is based on grids per items which allow to group
responses to the various questionnaires.
Beyond these issues, the study focused also on the modes of reasoning in relation to
the concept of system in various areas of biology to the economy, and on the degree of
involvement in the understanding of complexity. The study focused on teachers of
SVT (life and Earth Science) 2nd year secondary Tunisian (17-19 years old) concerned
with the teaching of the ecosystem. It is held during the school years 2008 / 2009 and
2009 / 2010. Pre-test questionnaires, conducted respectively with two groups: 19
teachers (Group 1) and 17 teachers (Group 2) of the Regional Directorate of Tunis 2
education.
A training for teachers on the systemic approach took place in the same meeting, after
the responses to the questionnaires. It focused on the basis of the systemic approach,
its basic concepts, his educational contributions and some application domains.
Practical examples were discussed. At the end of the training session, teachers were
asked to apply the systems approach in a class situation during the teaching of the
concept of the ecosystem, the didactic framework aimed at enabling students to build
an instruction based on scientific concepts in operating in a system?.
6
At a second meeting, post-test questionnaires were conducted with the teachers of the
same groups. A sheet of the teaching tools used in class, by each of the teachers of the
group, described the chosen tool and its benefits. An interview was conducted with
some teachers of each group on the issues listed in the pre-test and post-test to
complement the written replies. In the descriptive profiles, and to determine the
degree of understanding of the systems approach as a pedagogical choice by teachers,
the following issues were raised.
Where/which of the following teaching tools have you used in the classroom for the
teaching of the concept of ecosystem (Question 1)?
-A concept map or a conceptogramme
-A folder prepared by each student on a theme chosen in advance
-Output on the field with the students in the class
-A debate in class from a specific document or topic
-Another tool, to describe
Describe the benefits of the educational tool that you used in the classroom: how did
they allow you to help students understand the ecosystem, the network relationship
between the components, the hierarchy of relationships, the exchange with the
environment (Question 2)?
Can you describe the contributions of the schematisations compared to other
educational tools in the teaching of the ecological concepts (Question 3)?
Which are the most successful teaching educational tools you can use according to the
systemic approach ecological concepts (Question 4)?
Selected teaching tool:
Justify your choice:
The approaches
and complexity,)
Index cards
pedagogical
1. Analysis of educational choices for
teaching ecosystem (field trip on the
ground, conceptogramme, debate, )
Research for new Research of educational objectives bound
educational culture to choices (global vision, understanding of
the complexity, research of links,)
3.Identification of modes of thinking
(systemic approach and pedagogical choice)
Based on Related to
Group 79 % 92 % 85 % 26 % 31 % 68.4% to 58 % 85 % to 94 %
1 to to to to to 40.2% (SR) to Modification
74 % 89 % 88 % 50 % 25 % N: 81 % 83 % of structure
Set of Physical Complemen- Action / Complemen- Exchange With (+)
elements biology tarity retroaction tarity I: 46% to 19 border 15 % to 5 %
16 % 8% 10 % 42 % 37 % % 42 % Modifying
(unchanged) to to to to Balance to structure
Organized / 11 % 5% 33 % 31 % D: 67% to 17 % (-)
structured Sociology Rules and laws Positive/ Exchange / 83 % Without
negative balance Variability border
6 (b)
50 % Relay
(unchanged)
Group 71 % 86 % 35 % 18 % 36 % 82.3% to 81 % 94 % to 87%
2 to to to to to 50% (SR) to Modification
43 % 84 % 69 % 23 % 45 % N: 46% to 93 % of structure
Set of Physical Complemen- Action / Complemen- 50 % With (+)
elements biology tarity retroaction tarity Exchange border 6 % to 13 %
12 % 14 % 47 % 70 % 36 % I: 43% to 20 18 % Modifying
to to to to to % to structure
36 % 16 % 8% 54 % 9% Balance 7% (-)
Organized / Sociology Rules and Positive Exchange / D: 12% to Without
structured /negative balance 67 % border
laws
Variability
6 (b)
42% to 50%
Relay
SR: no response; N: nature, I: importance, D: density
Percentages expressed at the forefront are relative to the answers to the pre-test, those second
place belongs to answering the post-test.
The systems approach is a didactic approach meant to clarify to teachers with the
ultimate objective to enable learners to achieve this change in way of thinking.
When the situation is at the experimental level, we can recognize the results, but
how to generalize them, to make them "educational" and put them within reach of
all teachers? Educational tools selected by each of the teachers can be seen as 'limits'
to changes in designs. Only the inclusion of the systemic approach as curriculum
option and the training of teachers in this learning process can enhance the
9
understanding of the systemic thinking and address the complexity in the learning
process of complex concepts. In responses to the post-test questionnaires, some
teachers interviewed have changed the responses between questionnaires and
interview. With the second group, this change reflects a "trend" towards answers and
justifications related to a way of thinking taking into account the functional aspects of
the systems. Appropriate training of teachers on the systemic approach could
facilitate the understanding of the complexity of the systems and the development of
its emergent properties.
Teacher training on the systemic approach and analysis of case studies, participated in
the change in SVT teachers' responses towards more functional aspects of the systems
The notion of system is now thought into areas such as sociology and economics, and
the types of interactions and relationships between the parties and the system,
promote complementarily and exchange. The operating mode of the systems and their
dynamic integrate regulation and balance. The major difficulty remains regarding the
ability of teachers to put into practice the systemic approach and enable learners in
their turn, to achieve a change in way of thinking that integrates complexity. Proposals
for responses based on global and blurry ideas seem to prevent linking structural
and functional aspects for a better conceptualization of the concept of system. The
sustainability of a change the designs in support of functional system approach would
need to be strengthened through training in the didactic approach promoting a way of
thinking which apprehends the complexity of systems. The analysis of designs
highlights 'what works' or 'adverse' factors in order to access the complexity of the
concept of system (see figure 3).
In connection with the notion of system, key concepts such as borders, dynamics and
flows, are seen differently if we place ourselves on the side of the structural approach
or the functional approach. In the case of designs promoting systemic approach
borders are seen as boundaries between elements or subsystems, the dynamics
appears to be necessary interactions to ensure system balance and exchanges are
expressed in terms' of 'tools' and 'relay'.
Structural approach of
system
Subsystem, Communicatio
Element n network
Permeable Reorganization
Flow : energy, matter,
information
Complementarity,
Types of interaction, Unit
interdependence
Functional approach of
system
With the conceptual change, the same concepts are translated differently; borders are
seen as non-watertight limitations to exchange. The dynamics of the system is related
to the concept of reorganization which enjoys the system to ensure its survival and the
exchanges are designed as energy, material and information flows. In the first category
of designs, the key concepts appear as 'obstacles' to access the emergent properties of
the system. Only the complementarity between structural and functional approaches
to make the concepts of borders, dynamics and Exchange factors 'favourable' to the
complexity of the concept of system.
Table 2: summary of the results of the analysis of tools teaching of groups 1 and 2
The choice of teaching materials remains in the same orientation as the designs. The
field trips are the most widely used educational tool. On the one hand it is prescribed
in the curriculum, and secondly the teacher 'dares' not try a new teaching tool, some
have done at our request by trying other options such as the conceptual map. The
benefits of applied educational tools focus on the understanding of the ecosystem,
looking for links to establish a network of relations between its elements or the
identification of the exchange between the ecosystem and the environment. Although
teachers recognize that the schematisations have important educational inputs as
emergent properties, the overall vision and evaluation, these contributions have not
favoured with the chosen educational tools.
The case of educational tools that promote the more systemic approach, recalls once
again a usual paradox in teaching: a new educational choice still requires some time to
be implemented. Although the conceptual map is a teaching tool selected and tried,
the field trips that may help to conceptualize the ecosystem are a choice influenced by
socio-professional appearance.
Projected evolution
Analysis of pre-test Analysis of post-test
questionnaire questionnaire
The dynamics
space / time
Elements, subsystem
(interrelation)
Borders Permeable borders
(limits) (flow)
Reorganization
Interaction (complexity)
(exchanges)
Conceptions
Adaptation Complementarity
(behavior) Factors of choice: the (unit)
socioprofesional status
The in-service training,
Mode of thinking including
the complexity
Pedagogical choices Process (conceptual
approaches)
Exploring
New pedagogical The approaches
possible culture
Index cards The choices
pedagogical
Training Strategy
Global approach,
research links
Objectives (learn about
Pedagogic practices the systemic approach,
(cognitive, metacognitive: critical mind) confront the complexity)
Using computer tools, the use of the schematisations is commonplace in the field of
education; however there is a teaching tool of limited application and a pedagogical
choice unknown to teachers. The characterization of the systemic approach to the
classical approach reveals that the 'complexity' aspect is difficult to recognize in the
responses of Group 2.
Question 9 Question 10
Characterization of the systemic approach Characterization of the classical approach
Group Allows the vision overall 59% Analysis by dissociation 88 %
1 Establish a network of interactions 41% Ineffective facing complexity 12 %
Group Allows the vision overall 73 % Analysis by dissociation 90%
2
In the learning of the ecological concepts, 'a conceptogramme' can be a conceptual tool
for non-linear thinking and explaining the interactions and feedbacks, so as to develop
the 'circular causation' to clear the hidden face of the complexity of the systems,
emergent properties.
12
Conclusion
The vagueness and ambiguity appear when it is placed in the register of the common
knowledge of systems: borders, exchange, regulation and dynamics. These
knowledge-related designs are quite easy especially if the teacher is answering
questions such as nature, importance and density of exchanges or regulating the
system to disturbances which undergoes its environment. Obstacles arise to imagine
'leaky borders ' playing the role of limits, but at the same time allowing the exchanges
between the system and its environment. Training on systemic and its foundations,
offers teachers an opportunity to rethink the concept of system, broaden the scope of
this concept in various fields. A new way of thinking, based on research of links, is
now possible building on the interaction and the notion of 'all' characteristic of
systems. Despite the reported difficulties, a 'shy' change of conceptions appears when
issues of post-test, especially about the definition of the system, how it works, the
types of interaction between components and boundaries. The spatio-temporal
evolution, the reorganization of the system to the disturbances and Exchange fluxes
are notions which are difficult for teachers to imagine using in various fields. These
are factors described as "preventing" the apprehension of the complexity. This
difficulty is especially found in the descriptive notes where the teacher persists in
choices of classical approach methods, despite a request to apply the systemic
approach in the teaching of the concept of ecosystem. Extending this research to other
groups of teachers could reveal details of the ideas and modes of reasoning of each but
would also make known this process as much as possible. Ultimately, it would be
advisable that learning through systemic approach be reflected in educational
objectives and practical steps included in the official Programmes, offering in parallel
educational resources for teachers. Such a proposal should be supported by
appropriate training of teachers in the functional approach to systems.
References
Aracil, J. (1984). Introduction to the dynamics of systems. Lyon: University Press, 412 pages.
Bertalanffy, L. Von, (1973). General systems theory, physics, biology, psychology, sociology,
philosophy, translation Chabrol Jean-Benot, 257 pages. Paris: Dunod, p.53.
De Rosnay, J. (1975).The macroscope, towards a global vision, 345 pages. Paris: Seuil, p. 101.
Donnadieu, k. & Karsky, M. (2002). The systemic thinking and acting in the complexity.
Editions: Bindings, 269 pages.
Durand, D. (1979). The systemic. Series what do I know? 127 pages, 1re Edition, Paris: PUF, p.
8-9, p. 68.
Febvre, M. & Giordan, A. (1990). Mastering scientific and medical, information techniques and
teaching methods, 227 pages. Editions: Delachaux Niestl, p. 22-47.
Giordan, A. & Souchon. C, (2008). Education for the environment towards sustainability.
Editions: Delagrave, 271 pages.
Giordan, A. & Souchon. C, (1991). Education for the environment. Collection Andr Giordan &
Jean - Louis Martinand, 'Practical Guides', 232 pages. Nice: Z' ditions, p. 9-11.
Giordan, A. & Vecchi, G. (1987). The origins of knowledge, scientific concepts learners designs
pages. Editions: Delachaux et Nestl, p. 42-43, 111-121, 205-212.
Giordan, A. & Martinand, J. L. (1988). Annals of Didactics of sciences, n 2, 192 pages. Editions:
Universit de Rouen, p. 14-15 and 31-32.
Giordan, A. (1978). Teaching methods for experimental science, 280 pages. Paris: Centurion
Giordan, A. (1999). For experimental science didactics. 239 pages. Paris: Belin, p. 139-173.
13
Giordan, A. (2002). Another school for our children, 249 pages. Paris: Editions Delagrave, p.
137-153.
Le Moigne, J. L. (1983). The general system theory, theory of modeling, 258 pages. Paris:
col.decisions systems, PUF, second edition, p. 37.
Le Moigne, J.L. (1990). Modeling of complex systems. AFCET systems, headed by Bernard
Paulr Collection. Paris: Dunod, p. 24.
Morin, E. (1977). The method,T1, 399 pages. ditions du Seuil, p. 102.
Morin, E. (1990). Introduction to complex thought, 158 pages. Paris: ESF, p. 68-69.
Morin, E. (1999). The well head is made, rethink reform, reform thought, 155 pages. ditions du
Seuil, p. 11.
Novak, j. d. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools facilitate learning
meaningful to, In Instructional science 19, p. 29-52. SpringerLink.com accessed September 12,
2009).
Pascal, B. (1669). Thought I, XV. Transition of knowledge of man to God. Editions presented,
prepared and annotated by Michel Le Guern (1977). Editions: Gallimard, p.159.
Sanner, M. (1983). From concept to the fantasy, 253 pages. Editions: PUF, p. 76-88.
Walliser, B. (1977). Systems and models critical to the analysis of systems introduction, 248
pages. Paris: Seuil, p 9-10.
14
Jack T. Tessier, Nana-Yaw Andoh, Kristin DeForest, Matthew W. Juba, Akira Odani,
John J. Padovani, Elizabeth F. Sova, and Lisa M. Tessier
SUNY Delhi
Delhi, New York, USA
Introduction
Assessment of educational practices is becoming more and more important to college
teachers.In one form, assessment is required for accreditation of the institution
(Lubinescu, Ratcliff, & Gaffney, 2001;Middle States Commission on Higher Education
[MSCHE], 2006;New England Association of Schools and Colleges [NEASC], 2012), and
leads to important school-wide improvements based on those results (Scrivens, 1997).In
another form, professors are increasingly encouraged to assess their own teaching and to
treat it as a form of scholarship (Boyer, 1990;Richlin& Cox, 2004).These efforts give further
credibility to the art of teaching and improve practices for the benefit of students,
teachers, and society (Trigwell, Martin, Benjamin, & Prosser, 2000). In order to conduct
assessment effectively, the teacher needs to consider the range of designs that are
available and appropriate based on the item being assessed (Wiersma, 1991).These
experimental designs range from those that include pre- and post-tests along with control
groups to ones with a post-test only (Wiersma, 1991).The myriad designs yield a range of
data that allow the teacher to know different things about their students and their
learning.Comparing these approaches allows teachers to see the benefits and limitations
of the approaches.
The objective of this study was to compare three different experimental designs for a
scholarship of teaching and learning project to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of
each approach.We analyzed data from pre- and post-test with control, pre- and post-test
alone, and post-test designs within a single project to make this comparison (Tessier et
al.,2013).
Methods
Conduct of this study was approved by SUNY Delhis Institutional Review Board before
the onset of data collection.We engrained the concept of sustainability across four courses
(Architecture, Biology, Business, and Humanities disciplines), and three non-curricular
activities (community service, learning center, and residence life areas) on the SUNY
Delhi campus.With each course in which sustainability was embedded, we paired a
similar course in which sustainability was not embedded as a control.We delivered a pre-
semester and post-semester survey to all of these students assessing their understanding
of the concept of sustainability and if they felt the concept was important to the course
and their career.We used data from the control courses to compare the results for students
who did and did not engage in the non-curricular activities in the project.Details of the
approach can be seen in Tessier et al. (2013).
This approach allowed us to compare three designs for the experiment and data
analyses.All statistical tests were conducted using Minitab version 16 (Minitab, Inc., State
College, PA USA) at = 0.05.First, we compared the change in students knowledge of
sustainability and their views on its importance between treatment (those in the class or
activity that infused sustainability) and control groups (students who were not in a class
or activity that infused sustainability) using t-tests.Second, we used t-tests to compare the
pre-semester and post-semester scores for students understanding of and views on
sustainability within the group of students who took a course or participated in an
activity that infused sustainability.Third, we compared the average student score within
treatment groups for understanding of sustainability and views on sustainability to a pre-
set goal (knowing 2 or more tenets of sustainability and feeling that sustainability was
important to the course and the students career).
Results
Pre- and Post-Semester with Control:In the pre-post with control design, we found that the
treatment courses helped students understand the concept of sustainability more than the
control courses in every case (Table 1).In only one pairing did the treatment course
increase the students perception of the relatedness of sustainability to the course more
than the control (Table 1), and in none of the course pairings did the treatment course
increase the students perception of the relevance of sustainability to their careers more
than the control course (Table 1).In two of the three non-curricular areas, students who
participated in activities increased their understanding of the tenets of sustainability more
than those who did not participate (Table 2).In none of the non-curricular areas did
participation in the activities increase students perception of the importance of
sustainability to their careers more than non-participation (Table 2).
Pre- vs. Post-Semester:In comparing pre- and post-semester understanding of the tenets of
sustainability, every course led to a significant increase (Table 3). In half of the courses,
there was also a significant increase in the perception that sustainability was important to
the course (Table 3). In none of the courses was there a significant increase in students
perception of the relevance of sustainability to their careers (Table 3). In non-curricular
areas, participation in one area led to a significant within semester increase in students
knowledge of the tenets of sustainability, but participation in none of the areas led to a
significant increase in students perceptions of the relevance of sustainability to their
careers (Table 2).
Assessment Goals:In comparing the results with our goal, students in two courses knew
enough of the tenets of sustainability, students in two courses sufficiently saw the
relevance of sustainability to the course, and students in three courses sufficiently saw the
relevance of sustainability to their careers (Table 3). In non-curricular areas, student
participation in activities did not help them to reach the goal of knowing the tenets of
sustainability, but participants in one area sufficiently saw the relevance of sustainability
to their career (Table 2).
Table 1. Differences between (T) Treatment courses (those with sustainability embedded as a
concept) and (C) Control courses (those without sustainability embedded as a concept) on
students knowledge of sustainability and their view of its importance to the course and their
career at SUNY Delhi, Delhi, NY USA. Comparisons in bold are significantly different at =
0.05. Numbers in parentheses are standard errors.
Course Name Mean Change in # Mean Change in Mean Change in
Known Tenets of Students View of the Students View of the
Sustainability Relevance of Relevance of
(Post minus Pre) Sustainability to the Sustainability to Their
Course (Post minus Career (Post minus Pre)
Pre)
ARCH 135 T 0.524 (0.16) T 0.04 (0.31) T 0.38 (0.26)
Architectural Design
C -0.11 (0.20) C 0.11 (0.20) C 0.33 (0.24)
Fundamentals
P = 0.024 P = 0.850 P = 0.907
BIOL 110 T 2.04 (0.20) T -0.64 (1.00) T -0.04 (0.26)
Environmental Issues
C -0.13 (0.09) C 0.31 (1.04) C 0.11 (0.25)
and Sustainability
P < 0.0001 P = 0.001 P = 0.685
BUSI 100 Introduction T 0.65 (0.29) T 0.04 (1.15) T 0.13 (0.26)
to Business
C -0.32 (0.15) C 0.37 (0.76) C -0.40 (0.26)
P = 0.005 P = 0.279 P = 0.156
HUMN 242 History of T 1.78 (0.39) T -0.65 (0.22) T -0.35 (0.15)
World and Western
C -1.14 (0.39) C -0.17 (0.42) C 0.21 (0.26)
Architecture II
P < 0.0001 P = 0.325 P = 0.075
Discussion
The results from the courses show a similar trend in learning using the pre-post with
control or the pre-post without control designs (Tables 1 and 3). The courses were most
effective at helping students learn the tenets of sustainability. The pre-post without
control revealed more significant effects of the courses than did the pre-post with control,
however. Comparing the students scores to a goal revealed the most successful findings
including three out of four courses with students highly viewing the relevance of
sustainability to their careers, which did not show up as significant in the other two study
designs (Tables 1 and 3). The results from the non-curricular areas were more sporadic
among study designs, highlighting the lower efficacy of the non-curricular areas relative
to the courses (Table 2). In fact, there was no alignment of significant findings within
areas across study designs. For example, the Resnick Learning Center helped students
learn the tenets of sustainability based on the pre-post without control design but not in
any other design (Table 2). Also, the OConnor Center for Community Engagement
helped students reach the goal of viewing sustainability as relevant to their careers, but
there was not a significant change in that area when compared to control students (Table
2).
Table 3.Effect of embedding sustainability into four courses at SUNY Delhi, Delhi, NY USA on
students knowledge of the tenets of sustainability and their view of the importance of
sustainability to the course and their career. Data in bold indicate that the score met a goal or
there is a significant difference in the comparison at = 0.05. Numbers in parentheses are
standard errors.
Course Name Mean # Mean Mean Mean # Mean Mean
Known Relevance Relevance Known Relevance of Relevance of
Tenets of of of Tenets of Sustainability Sustainability
Sustain- Sustain- Sustain- Sustainability to Course (1 = to Career (1 =
ability ability to ability to (Pre-Semester High, 5 = Low; High, 5 = Low;
(Post- Course (1 Career (1 vs. Post- Pre-Semester Pre-Semester
Semester) = High, 5 = High, 5 Semester) vs. Post- vs. Post-
Goal of = Low; = Low; Semester) Semester)
2+ Post- Post-
Semester) Semester)
Goal of Goal of
2 2
ARCH 135 0.60 (0.15) 2.00 (0.17) 1.92 (0.18) Pre 0.11 (0.08) Pre 2.29 (0.14) Pre 1.79 (0.14)
Architectural Post 0.60 Post 2.00 (0.17) Post 1.92 (0.18)
Design (0.15) P = 0.199 P = 0.568
Fundamentals P = 0.007
BIOL 110 2.28 (0.20) 1.32 (0.17) 1.96 (0.19) Pre 0.24 (0.09) Pre 1.96 (0.22) Pre 2.00 (0.16)
Environmental Post 2.28 Post 1.32 (0.17) Post 1.96 (0.19)
Issues and (0.20) P = 0.004 P = 0.880
Sustainability P < 0.0001
BUSI 100 1.17 (0.26) 2.22 (0.23) 2.30 (0.23) Pre 0.52 (0.15) Pre 2.17 (0.16) Pre 2.17 (0.20)
Introduction Post 1.17 Post 2.22 (0.23) Post 2.30 (0.23)
to Business (0.26) P = 0.857 P = 0.623
P = 0.032
HUMN 242 2.19 (0.24) 2.27 (0.12) 1.77 (0.13) Pre 0.42 (0.11) Pre 2.92 (0.19) Pre 2.18 (0.15)
History of Post 2.19 Post 2.27 (0.12) Post 1.77 (0.13)
World and (0.24) P = 0.006 P = 0.119
Western P < 0.0001
Architecture II
Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first direct comparison of experimental designs
for assessment and the scholarship of teaching and learning. We hope that these results
will be useful to those people who are designing assessment or education research
projects. These results have demonstrated the importance of including pre- and post-
semester data and using a control when conducting assessment or research on teaching
and learning. However, the classroom is not a laboratory where every factor can be
controlled. For example, control classes may not be available, a pre-test may bias a
students approach to a course, or there may be insufficient time for all data collection. We
encourage education scholars to employ the best designs possible given the constraints of
their situation, and to employ pre-post with control to go along with pre-set goals
whenever possible.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ben McGraw for encouraging us to make this comparison among study designs
at the outset of our research project and the students who agreed to let us use their data
for the study.
References
Boyer, E.L. (1990).Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of
Teaching.http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED326149.pdf
Lubinesco, E.S., Ratcliff, J.L., & Gaffney, M.A.(2001). Two continuums collide: accreditation and
assessment. New Directions for Higher Education, 2001, 5-
21.http://cyceduaccred.pbworks.com/f/10210956.pdf
Middle States Commission on Higher Education.(2006). Characteristics of Excellence in Higher
Education:
Requirements of Affiliation and Standards for Accreditation.Philadelphia, PA:Middle States
Commission on Higher Education. https://www.msche.org/publications/CHX-2011-
WEB.pdf
New England Association of Schools and Colleges. (2012). New England Association of Schools and
Colleges
Standards for Accreditation.Bedford, MA: New England Association of Schools and Colleges.
Retrieved from
http://cihe.neasc.org/standards_policies/standards/standards_html_version
Richlin, L.,& Cox, M.D.(2004). Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching and
learning through faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,
2004, 127-
135.http://www.fresnostate.edu/academics/csalt/documents/RichlinCox2004.pdf
Scrivens, E. (1997). Putting continuous quality improvement into accreditation: improving
approaches to
quality assessment. Quality in Health Care, 6, 212-
218.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1055496/pdf/qualhc00026-0036.pdf
Tessier, J.T., Andoh, N.-Y., DeForest, K., Juba, M.W., Odani, A., Padovani, J.J., Sova, E.F., &Tessier,
L.M.
(2013). An assessment of sustainability across the campus.International Journal of Education,
5, 82-95. http://macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ije/article/viewFile/4318/3794
Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M.(2000). Scholarship of teaching: a model. Higher
Education Research and Development, 19, 155-
168.http://www.fmhs.uaeu.ac.ae/ResearchGroups/MERG/journal/scholarshiptrigmwell
.pdf
Alireza Yousefy
Associate professor, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of
Medical
Science, Isfahan, Iran
Narges Keshtiaray
Assistant professor, Department of Educational Science, Khorasgan (Isfahan) Branch,
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract: What today is called social capital implies other definition of capital
that is critical besides other types of human and material capital. Social
sciences scholars believe that one of effective institutions on formation of social
capital is educational institutions and curriculums. Through changing
curriculums social capital can improve. Accordingly the present research aims
to design some teaching method to develop social capital within the higher
education system. To do this, qualitative and field survey was used. Also, 12
scholars in the field of curriculum and social capital were interviewed with.
Then, the content of interviews was analyzed and in the process of coding, the
presented ideas were classified separately and the common ideas were placed
in the similar groups. In this part, teaching method was identified as a major
issue. Finally, the way this factor affects social capital was examined. So, for
the major factor of the current research, its casual conditions, strategies and
hypotheses were separated and provided within a paradigm model. The
ultimate model was designed thorough generalizing the paradigm segments to
social capital.
Introduction
Times prior to appearance of social capital, three types of capital were famous physical
capital (facilities and infrastructures, dams, high ways etc.), national capital (stocks,
bond, money etc.), and human capital (skills and personal abilities, specialists,
distinguished managers etc.). Though, in modern literature the notion of social capital
was added to the former types of capital (Mobasheri, 2008). According to Bourdieu,
social capital is sum of the potential and actual resources that is the result of an
ownership of a resistant network of institutionalized relations of familiarization and
22
Actually, social capital as one type of capital has a great impact on the community
success. Experts define many functions for social capital. Generally speaking, the effect
of social capital on three domains of economy, politics and culture are more evident
than others areas. Using from individuals similarities in different aspects, social
capital causes a sense of trust , serves economic benefits and makes the ground in
which the cost of using human resources decreases, but their interaction increases.
With its moral values and principles in economy obliges peoples to communicate,
exchange and decide in different social groups (Woolcock, 2008).
Taking the above points together, it is concluded that social capital in the current
world is one of the most significant factor in development of countries and
identification of the effective factors in strengthening or weakening it are strongly
contributive to expansion of social capital and ends to increase of individuals social
and economic performance. In a natural process, as the scientific society grows, the
social capital also develops in parallel. In such conditions, the university task is not
education only. In fact, university is neither an economic enterprise nor emits
academic degrees. So, formal educations are only a part of the academic programs. On
the other hand, scientific, being critical and creative motives, ability to make scientific
communications, reproduction power as well as the ability to combine different ideas
among students and simultaneously a foresight, participatory and identity fixation in
interaction with others have to reinforce in the academic environment. Therefore,
university is not a mere educational center. Here since the higher education center and
social capital are in communication, the university must be able to develop the social
capital (ZakerSalehi, 2008).
capital among students have to be identified and the appropriate teaching method is
designed.
Therefore, the purpose of the present research is to design teaching methods of the
higher education with an emphasis on identification of effective obstacles, and
strategies on development of social capital among students. So, the following research
questions are addressed:
1. What are the obstacles before teaching methods of the higher education curriculum
for development of social capita?
2. What teaching methods strategies in higher education curriculum cause the
expansion of social capital?
3. What are the consequences of designing teaching methods based on social capital
development?
4. Is it possible to design a model for teaching methods to develop social capital in the
higher education system?
Theoretical framework
Theoretically social capital is one of the most prominent issues in social sciences and
may not correlate with teaching methods. Though, since the individuals spend a
considerable amount of their time in educational environments, the effects of
happenings in such places on the peoples behavior and life should not be ignored. So
far many several definitions have been proposed for social capital that makes it
difficult to achieve a consensus about the actual meaning of social capital. Though,
what is understood from all definitions of social capital is investment in social
relations with expected ties .
Putnam (2005) believed that social capital is those characteristics of social life,
networks, norms and trust that enable participants to follow their common goals more
effectively. As he said, social capital is a means to create social and political
development in different political systems as well as trust between people, governors
and political elites that bring political development.
Flora (1995) describes collective consciousness as social capital and introduces mutual
trust as an index of collective consciousness.
A series of available norms in the social systems end to increase of members
cooperation and contrarily leads to decrease of cost of interactions. In this definition,
some concepts like civil society and social institutions hold a close relationship with
social capital (Schiff, 2004).
24
Aisenschtat believed that the most important issue in formation of a community with
proper social capital is concerning to individuals trust, solidarity and social
participation. Without solidarity and social participation besides lack of trust, the new
social order would be impossible (Chalabi, 2007).
Curriculum
As Mevish in his book an introduction to sociology discusses, some of the most
fundamental functional needs of a society must be taken into consideration at time of
specification of educational objectives, content and method in the curriculums. He
stated that social institutions like higher education needs to prepare the required
backgrounds for its members in field of making a correct communication with
environment due to interacting with individuals (Yarmohammadian, 2012).
The learners of educational system as the members of a society have to now that the
community they are living in has what qualities, and how it would be possible to play
their social role as much efficient as possible. In case of the instructors and curriculum
designers of such problems, the curriculum objects and content probably contradict
with social needs and problems and consequently the programs fail to succeed
(Yarmohammadian, 2012).
In fact teaching has different variables that is necessary through manipulation, control
or study of its variables, a better condition for students learning is created ( Khorshidi,
2002). Familiarization with teaching methods and principles and applying them help
educational objectives to be achieved more easily and in a shorter time. Generally,
teaching methods are categorized in two parts. Firstly, methods were used in long past
(historical methods) and secondly, methods are based on psychological and
educational findings (new methods). ( Safavi, 1998).
25
Authorities that are granted to professors in order to change teaching conditions and
make the effective factors on their teaching process applicable are teaching patterns.
They include problem solving, pre-organizers, individual teaching, social patterns etc.
Actually, these patterns work as a plan (Joyce, 2004).
Marjaei (2004) in a study naming social capital among university students examined
different rate of social capital among individuals with different educations. The results
indicate that in most of components a meaningful relationship exists between rate of
education and social capital. In other words, descending from PhD degree to associate
degree, a considerable decrease is evident in many components of social capital. In
addition, the students social capital showed a reverse relation with number their
study years.
Helliwell and Putnam (2007) worked on education and social capital in America. They
concluded that increase of average education has maximized trust and it has not
reduced level of participation as the second component of social capital. Park (2006)
investigated the role of trust in creation of knowledge inside a artificial university.
According to Park (2006), the main conditions for production of social capital are
opportunity, motivation, and ability. It was conclude that trust affects knowledge
creation through opportunity, motivation and ability of combining knowledge in an
artificial university and a few factors like informal network, norms, common values
and mutual trust are influential on creation of knowledge.
Totterman and Wulff (2007) in their research explored the effect of sharing information
at a university on social capital. They reasoned that sharing knowledge through three
variables (social identity, effective trust, participation and personal interaction) affects
social capital.
Method
As the present research purpose to design teaching methods on the basis of social
capital, the participants opinions were asked via interview. To analyze the data and
converting them to quantitative data, the Grounded Theory was used. The Grounded
Theory is a deductive-exploratory method enables the researcher in different fields
that instead of relying on the existing theories devises a theory personally. This
method is a general research method for generating a theory (Flick, 2011).
26
The population consisted of all professors of curriculum major and sociologists were
working at the higher education centers of Iran in 2013. Through purposeful sampling
method with desirable cases besides considering the articles published, the
participants were selected. They included 12 curriculum and social capital experts.
After interviewing and ensuring about the bulk of mentioned ideas, the interview was
stopped.
The data were collected via semi-structured interviews. Before the session begins,
complete explanations were given to the interviewee(s) about the research object,
method and the desired conclusion. In order to have perfect information the
interviews were recorded and the content written down. The procedure went in a way
that first 2 to 3 general questions were asked and according to the answers of previous
questions, the new questions were asked.
During the interview sessions any probable deviation from the main subject of
interviews were avoided and whole procedure was carefully guided. Moreover, the
basis for determination of reliability and validity of the asked questions was the
researcher. The obtained data from semi-structured interviews and theoretical
information were gathered together. The interviews were conducted individually and
lasted one and half to two hours.
For analyzing the data, the open, axial, and selective data coding was used.
In open data coding, the data related to the studied phenomenon were carefully
named and categorized. The unit if analysis was paragraph and the content of
interviews were first written down and after removing the irrelevant statements to the
research subject, the data were classified in form of paragraphs. The similar
paragraphs were written next to each other and the main points were extracted from.
In the process of coding, two comparing and asking techniques were applied.
In the axial coding, the data were previously analyzed to concepts and categories in
the open coding, were integrated with a new method. In this stage, a major category
and its sub-categories were connected to each other. This happened via a Paradigm
model including Causal Conditions, Phenomenon, Context, Strategies and
Hypotheses and juxtaposition of the similar concepts. This caused the concepts could
shape the more basic category are identified and each one places in one of these
categories.
In the selective coding, the core category and its relation to other categories besides
increasing validity of such relations would occur through searching for authenticated
and not authenticated cases. In the selective coding, the categories are consistent in
order to shape the theoretical framework. After specification of the central category,
according to the Paradigm model, the minor categories were linked to the major
categories. Then, the final model was drawn and the relation of core category with
other categories was illustrated.
Findings
In the open coding overall 104 conceptual codes from all interviewees opinions were
obtained. The concepts were compared with each other and similar concepts with the
same subject became a category and got labeled. For labeling the categories if the
category was a known and clear name in the theoretical resources it was used in order
27
to prevent the participants different perception when examining the results. Then,
concepts were related were placed next to each other and a new series was formed.
In the axial coding process, the second level concepts were achieved. Through this
number of concepts decreased significantly. In the last stage, the central category of
the research, teaching methods, were identified in selective coding.
To draw the Paradigm model, the obtained 104 codes were divided into three sections
causal conditions, strategies and hypotheses. The number of level one concepts
reduced for causal conditions from49 codes to 14 codes in the second level, for
strategies from 33 codes to 8 codes and for hypotheses from 22 codes to 5 codes. Fig.1
shows the Paradigm model.
Obstacles
Strategies
consequences Context
Valued students activities Unfamiliarity of professors to new
teaching media
Strengthening Higher education no desire to use training aids
group activities Group based teaching Unfamiliarity of professors to
Presenting class projects English language
and assignment related to Educational
Creation of a not interested in getting engaged
industry and society degree
environment for in group activities
discussion Professors disinterest in
Using new teaching development of their scientific
methods capabilities being dishonest about
Strengthening the doing projects and assignments
spirit of critical Major category
(phenomenon) Lack of an atmosphere for class
inquiry and Up-to date class materials discussion
criticism , adaptation of study Lack of actual participation of the
resources with schedules Teaching method student in the teaching process
based on social
Strengthening Being present in the class with a
Diversity of study resources capital
students forcing disciplinary
responsibility Utilizing new electronic not introducing various
media for teaching resources to students for
studying
Student
Interference no introduction of up to date
participation in resources to students
conditions
teaching process Students disinterest in
Type of university
Educational supplementary study
inflexibility of professors to
system
change their teaching methods
students desire to use old
method of lecture notes
social capital. In fact, teaching method is a factor directly affects social capital.
Therefore, it should be more inclined to be active in learning and teaching.
Active learning is a type of learning occurs with the least possible external
interferences. In this method, the instructor acts as a facilitator of learning. Hence,
active learning is effective on social capital only when the student is actively involved
in the process of learning and manages it.
The results of first research question indicate that one of the most important obstacles
before achievement of such program is the students attitudes toward teaching method
and the higher education. Inappropriate attitude here consists of three parts as
improper attitude of students about teaching method, education and professors. This
attitude then has a mutual relationship with social capital. From one hand, this
indicates the students to distrust of efficiency of classes and trained materials as well
as not being ready to participate in the process of teaching. On the other hand, this
type of attitude would decrease the students participation in the class and so they
miss the opportunity for increase of their participation and formation of a collective
moral.
The contemporary teaching methods not only fail to motivate the students to active
participation and presence in classes, but also they greatly spoil the relation between
social institutions and university and their shared trust. Some of obstacles that
interviewees mentioned included unfamiliarity of professors to new teaching media,
no desire to use training aids, unfamiliarity of professors to English language, not
interested in getting engaged in group activities, professors disinterest in
development of their scientific capabilities, being dishonest about doing projects and
assignments, lack of an atmosphere for class discussion, lack of actual participation of
the student in the teaching process, being present in the class with a forcing
disciplinary, not introducing various resources to students for studying, no
introduction of up to date resources to students, students disinterest in
supplementary study, inflexibility of professors to change their teaching methods, and
students desire to use old method of lecture notes.
Valued student activities, teaching based on group work, presenting class projects and
assignment related to industry and society , using new teaching methods, up-to date
class materials, adaptation of study resources with schedules, diversity of study
29
resources, utilizing new electronic media for teaching are a few strategies were
mentioned by the interviewees.
Flick and Williamson (2005) concluded that diverse teaching methods cause increase
of students social capital like group learning and learning services.
With regard to the third research question, the first result after changing teaching
methods and involving students in these methods was internalization of collective
spirit among students. Assigning the responsibility of teaching or presenting
assignment related to the student labor market needs makes him/her in connection to
other social groups and institutions and consequently, consciously or unconsciously
the individual practices socialization. As a matter of fact, the predicted programs for
the curriculum enable planners that through other drivers affect the students
socialization process and facilitate it. Strengthening of group work, creation of an
environment for discussions, reinforcement of inquiry and being critical,
reinforcement of students responsibility and students participation in the process of
teaching are of consequences the interviewees referred to.
To answer the fourth question, the final research model, which is a combination of the
main category and its causal conditions, strategies and hypotheses, was designed as
follows. Fig 2. shows the final model.
The research findings indicate that decrease of social capital components like trust,
participation and integration among individuals after getting admitted at universities
is taking place. Actually, university can function as a proper context for most of
activities potentially increase social capital. Therefore, it is recommended that the
curriculum designers do not distinguish teaching methods from social capital and
integrate them together. It is much better than teaching methods that contribute to
maximization of social capital are overtly included in the curriculum in order to
prevent from any subjective judgment when teaching occurs.
Moreover, the current method in implementation of curriculum is facing with
recession. Here, a few modification need to be considered either for redesigning of the
curriculum or in appropriate implementation of it. To make some positive changes in
execution of the curriculum it is suggested that the active teaching method approach is
utilized. Also, the constructionist theories have to be used when planning for learning
to happen in the curriculums. According to the constructionist theory, curriculum
includes not only specification of objects but deep learning process is also as important
as the outcomes. Here, instead of presenting a series of sometimes unrelated concepts
and facts to students, it is attempted the learning activities go hand in hand with
engagement of students in problem solving situations.
Additionally, when designing curriculums professors have to be free to modify
partially or completely the curriculum on the basis of their students rate of
knowledge, interest and perseverance and besides helping students to learn give them
the opportunity to play their role in learning based on experience and learning they
have. In this approach, the learner authority should be greatly concentrated and the
learning process has to move from student to professor and vice versa.
In the active learning and learner-based method, if the goal is to increase social capital,
becoming a member of group highly matters. in this way, actual activity in form of a
group and responsibility each member toward the ultimate outcome , allows the
members to practice the key components of social capital such as trust, participation ,
and solidarity and get ready for the real life .
References
Chalabi, M. (2007). Sociology of Order. Tehran: Nei Press.{in Persian}
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge, M. A: Harvard
University Press.
Eisner, E, W. (1979). Educational Imagination, Macmillan publishing company
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital, London and New York: Routledge Taylor &Francis
Group
Flick, B & Williamson, K., (2005). Frontiers in Education, FIE Apos, Proceedings35th
Annual conference, 19-22 oct.
Flick, O. (2011). Inteoduction in qualitative research. Translated : Jalili, H.Tehran: Nei
Press.{in Persian}
Flora, C.B. and J.L. Flora. (1995). The Past and Future: Social Contract, Social Policy and
Social Capital. In Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, edited by
S.A. Halbrook and C.E. Merry, pp. 53-64. Oak Brook, Illinois: Farm Foundation.
Fukuyama, F. the end of order ( 2006 ) Translated: Tavassoli, G. H. Iranian society
press{in Persian}
Helliwell, J., F, Putnam, R.D., (2007) Education and Social Capital, Eastern Economic
Journal, Vol. 33, No.1.
31
.
32
Allen A. Espinosa
Faculty of Science, Technology and Mathematics,
College of Teacher Development,
Philippine Normal University,
Manila, Philippines 1000
Introduction
Dance is a form of art that is very popular nowadays. People dance for many
reasons. Through dancing, they can express their feelings and emotions, or
represent and convey their own culture. It is a prime means of expression as human
beings that may have originated in the form of rudimentary as early as 1.8 million
years ago, when the bipedal anatomy of Homo ergaster can move the body fully
which enhanced the communication and body language (Mithen, 2005 as cited in
Sevdalis&Keller, 2011). Dance is a universal behavior which has a unique style
(Niemitz, 2010 as cited in Fink et al, 2012). It is a complex sensor-action which
comprises a set of rhythm, intentional, non-verbal body movements but culturally
influenced (Fink, Weege, et. al., 2011).
There are different theories or perspective that support dance as a sport. According
to the normative-descriptive point of view by Nastase (2012, page 888), it is the
summing of the standardized structures, explained biomechanically by the skills
become execution patterns with technical efficiency (particular technical elements).
According to Piaget (1950; as cite in Nastase, 2012), result of the personal
experiences, an attitude transfers from the instructors to the performers, from the
dancers to the spectators, knowledge of self and of the environment through the
active intervention of the dance. Dance is an art-sport, which originates in the
social group or couple dance based on a time limited complex motion activity and
as execution rhythm, by a melody, and spatially by a dance floor (Nastase, 2012).
Coaching is a different occupation in the society because they are expected to give
gentle and good persons to the society; this occupation needs different style in
handling an individual or a team and a difficult job to master (Martens, 2004; as
cited in Khalaj et al, 2011). Coaching is an organized-provision of assistance to a
group or an individual to help them not only to develop but also to improve the
performance in their chosen sport (Kent, 2005). Coaching is one of the issues in
making a person perform better. There are two types of coaching types:
Participation Coaching and Performance Coaching. Participation coaching is taking
apart in the feelings of the team rather than preparing into the specific sport while
the other type is focuses on long term goals for preparation in different
competitions (Cross & Lyle, 2005). The success to achieve the goal and the preferred
coaching types are supported by different coaching style or philosophies.
Autocratic coaching style or intense style is applied when the coach assumes
authority and decision-making is centralized. An advantage of this coaching style
includes a directive and dominating coach who prepares the group or the
individual for any type of competition. However, the down side of this coaching
style is its one-way learning process. The coach tends to show lack of empathy and
he is the only one determining the rules, rewards, and the standards (Lyle, 2006).
The effect of coaching style to dance performance is much related to, and may be
supported by Albert Banduras Social Learning Theory. Social learning theory
focuses on learning through observation and modeling. In his experiment of Bobo
Doll, Bandura concluded that children learn and imitate behaviors they have
observed in other people. Modeling can be classified into three, namely: a live
model, which involves an actual individual demonstrating or acting out a behavior;
the verbal instructional model, which involves descriptions and explanations of a
behavior; and lastly, the symbolic model, which involves real or fictional characters
displaying behaviors in books, films, television programs, or online media. In this
experiment, observation and modeling through a live model is done. Participants
observed how their coach executes the dance routine and try to imitate it. There are
steps involved in observational learning and modeling process, these are: (1)
attention, (2) retention, wherein the participants retain the information that they are
seeing, and (3) reproduction, after the participants have seen and retained the steps
of the dance routine, it is now their time to execute the steps that their leader had
shown; and lastly, (4) motivation, in order to learn through observational learning,
the participants should be motivated to imitate the behavior that has been modeled.
Thus, reinforcement and punishment is present (Bandura, 1971).
In the study, the four process of social learning as provided by the two coaching
styles involve participative coaching style and autocratic coaching style. For the
Autocratic Coaching style, the first process was undoubtedly seen during the
workshop. The participants were attentive and focused on the dance steps that their
coach was demonstrating. Worried that the coach might get angry if they will not
focus on each steps that was being demonstrated made them attentive. Thus the
second process was achieved. Retention was done when each members who were
attentively listening to their coachs instructions retains the information in their
memory. The third process, reproduction, was met when the members executed the
dance routine taught by their coach. For these three (3) processes to happen, the
participants must also undergo motivation. The motivation of the Autocratic Coach
is through punishment, the participants of the workshop were not allowed to have a
water break, to lean or to even sit unless routines are properly executed. Hence, the
participants were motivated to perform better for them to have a rest.
In the case of the participative coaching style, the four process of observational
learning was also present. Attention was visible in the participants although some
members may not be able to focus consistently because the coach was hardly strict.
The routine taught by the coach was retained in the memories of each participant
and was executed. For the Participative Group, it was the reinforcement that was
done in the experiment. The coach praised his member as they executed the routine
well and encourage them to perform better. This can be seen in the Participative
Coaching style. While in the Autocratic Coaching style, the coach will not give the
participants a time to rest until they memorized the routine and execute it well.
The other coaching style is the Participative style, a leadership style where the
leader takes asking approach to his team and adjust the routine if majority of the
team cant get the right thing to do the task. Participative leaders also base their
decisions on his teams opinions and approach. Research proven that being
intrinsically motivated to follow the welfare of the team is necessary to improve the
quality of performance and cooperation (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005). A team
performance depends to a large extent on how happy and motivated to follow the
collective welfare its members feel (Kelly &Barsade, 2001; Smith, Caroll, & Ashford,
1995). Research also shows that interactive result on motivation to work with the
leader was interceding by followers emotional reactions (De Cremer, 2006).
Research Objectives
The objective of this study is to determine which of the two coaching style,
specifically autocratic and participative, will best influence dancers in increasing
dance performance. The focus of the study is only geared to these two coaching
styles. Other styles of coaching are not included in this study (Bandura, 1971).
Hypothesis
Taken together, autocratic and participative coaching styles will determine the
outcome of the individuals performance after exposure to the conditioning done by
both coaching style how well ones exercised authority will determine its
influence in group performance. To test its main effect is valuable.
Null Hypothesis: Either of the two types of coaching style in this study will have no
significant difference on dance performance.
Research Simulacrum
Coaching Style:
Autocratic
Dance
Participative Performance
The paradigm illustrates the conceptual framework of the study and what coaching
style is more effective in a dance performance. The basis of conceptualizing the
effectiveness of coaching style in dance performance is to provide an opportunity of
understanding factors that may affect group performance. In this study, coaching
style is the umbrella of performance. The coaching styles used in this study focuses
on autocratic coaching and participative coaching. The two coaching style was
tested to see which will best influence dancers by significantly increasing their
performance.
Methods
A. Procedure
For the selection of participants, the sampling used was the Purposive Sampling,
wherein the researchers set criteria on how they picked their participants. The
criteria used were college students who were interested in dancing but have not
joined any dance groups or dance competitions yet. The implementation of the
experiment was done by conducting a free dance workshop to all college students
with the fixed criteria. Recruitment of participants was done through posting.
Twenty (25) students responded to the invitation. Number of members in each of
the two groups was dependent on the number of participants who joined the said
workshop, divided by two. It is to note that the number of participants must be
even to have an equal distribution of samples. On the first day of experimental
implementation, participants who have registered were assigned into two groups,
namely: Group A (autocratic), and Group P (participative), through fishbowl
method. Names of the participants were written on a piece of paper and hand-
picked for grouping. Those who fell under the first Group, Group A were handled
by an autocratic coach. On the other hand, those who fell under the second group,
Group P were handled by the participative coach.
Before the start of the workshop, the two leaders were oriented by the researchers
on how they will play the role of the autocratic and participative coaches. For the
coach of Group P, he was instructed to do the Participative coaching style. The
participative coach was more approachable than task-oriented. The coaches of this
type were more supportive to the members, they were instructive and ready to
reinforce, encourage and give positive feedback information to their members than
other coaches, thus increasing their members sense of competence, independence,
satisfaction and self-esteem (Chelladurai, 1993; Reimer &Toon, 2001; as cited in
Baric &Busick,2009). The coach in Group A was also instructed to do the Autocratic
coaching style. The coaches coaching style was more oriented towards task
accomplishment and outcome than towards people; they were highly oriented
towards results and winning. They were less supportive, less instructive and less
rewarding (Reimer &Toon, 2001; as cited in Baric &Burick,2009). The researchers
oriented them on the characteristics of the two coaching style that they will portray
in their respective groups during the dance workshop.
The dance workshop was held for two (2) days, each session has three(3) hours of
practice. In the workshop, the coaches taught their respective group a modern
dance, particularly a basic hip-hop dance, simultaneously. The dance routine was
taught by the coaches with the use of their designated coaching style within the
two-day period. On the last quarter of the second day, a mock dance competition
was held wherein the two dance groups competed with each other by performing
the dance routine taught by the two coaches. The dance performance of each group
was measured using dance criteria that were filled-up by 2 judges or dance experts.
Using the given criteria, the winner of the mock competition was determined and
announced.
B. Participants
The workshop had 14 participants with a mean age of 17.21 and a ratio of 9:5 male
and female who joined. All participants are college students who are interested in
dancing but have not joined any dancing competitions or dance groups yet.
C. Sampling Procedures
Purposive sampling was done in this study to set limitations on selecting
participants. To be consistent with the procedure, purposive sampling via fishbowl
method was done in dividing and distributing participants into groups for the
conditioning of the experiment. This was to avoid bias and randomizing
participants through subjective selection. This was also used to ensure that they
were distributed equally ---- without intentionally putting specific individuals
together by means of the researchers own judgment.
D. Research Design
The researchers conducted a posttest, between participants design. This design is
used to determine the effect of treatments to two different groups. It does not
employ pretest measures when participants are randomly assigned to conditions
considering some of the characteristics that they have. Since participants in the
study satisfied the research parameters, they were randomly assigned into two
groups and were exposed to different experimental treatment conditions: autocratic
coaching and participative coaching style dance groups, respectively. These
conditions were accounted for/by the definition of the independent variable which
was leadership style. Then the difference in their performance after the treatment is
determined.
E. Measures
In judging dance performance, researchers made a self-constructed evaluation
instrument. The following criteria were included in the instrument: overall
performance, moves execution, originality, and uniformity of the group. Its content
of this was validated by two (2) dance experts who have already judged in different
dance contests. After validating the content, it was decided that the criteria be
altered by focusing on the criteria for each individual. The criteria after validation
were changed into: foundation and self-confidence. Foundation is operationally
defined as the way in which the individual has established the execution of moves
in the routine. While self-confidence is also operationally defines as the process by
which the individual delivers his self during the dance.
Measures for coach selection for the experiment were not included. Instead,
confederates were oriented on how they will portray the character of the coaching
style assigned to them. The researchers explained the main purpose of the study to
the confederates and had them familiarized on the characteristics of the type of
F. Data Analysis
The Researchers used the non-parametric test specifically, Mann-Whitney U-Test. It
is seen as more applicable than T-test of independent samples considering the small
number of samples used in the study, which ranges from 5 to 20. The test is
appropriate because of the two condition of the study in coaching style (Autocratic
and Participative). The criteria to rate each sample will be used to determine which
coaching style is more statistically effective. The mortality rate of the participants
caused the sample to decrease in size, with a total of fourteen (14) for the two
conditions.
Results
Table1. Hypothesis testing
Level of
Variable Mean p-value Decision rule
significance
Autocratic 9.79
0.040 = 0.05 Reject Ho
Participative 5.21
The results of the study shows that there is a significant difference between the two
coaching style that employs 0.040 at 0.05 level of significance, which meets
hypothesis 1: there is a significant increase on the performance of dancers in using
autocratic coaching style.
Results of the experiment performed in the present study show that autocratic
coaching style is better than participative coaching style in increasing dance
performance. In addition to the statistical evidence, participants reported that they
have perceived their coachs strict stance in implementing rules and greater demand
in compliance positively. Through that approach, they became motivated to learn
the routine well. Some of the dancers in the autocratic group were very intimidated
with their leader. But rather than be combative, they became cooperative so they
performed better. Additionally, the possibility of appraisal from their coach once
they perform better than the other group reinforced them to execute the dance
routines competitively. From this statement, it can be concluded that dancers in the
autocratic group depend on the rewards that may be given by their coach.
On the other hand, this result negated previous literatures. Amorose and Horn
(2000), in their research about athletes intrinsic motivation and its association with
coaches behavior strengthened the hypothesis that higher intrinsic motivation
stems from a leadership style that emphasized training and instruction with high
democratic coaching behavior. Similarly, Jayasingam (2009) has proven that a
participative and nurturant-task leader behavior is more effective than that of
autocratic. Group members prefer supportive and considerate leaders to become
more cooperative and functional in achieving group goals. Quality of performance
and cooperation will be at its greater peak when the coach is compassionate and
empathic (De Cremer, 2006; Kelly &Barsade, 2001; Smith, Caroll, & Ashford, 1995).
An autocratic leader is a leader who is very strict, directive, and makes use of his
power of influence from his position to control rewards and force the followers to
comply with his instructions (Blau& Scott, 1963; Daft, 2005; Jogulu& Wood, 2006).
This style of leadership is most appropriate for participants who are still in the
process of learning and developing their skills (Van Vugt, Sarah F, Jepson, M. Hart,
& De Cremer, 2004). Given the sample parameters in this study, autocratic coaching
style worked better in improving their dance performance. Since participants are
still on the first stages of developing their dance skills, with only their interest to
learn as their initial investment, task-oriented coaching style worked. Participants
valued discipline and obedience so they were geared towards enhancement of their
dance skills (Bass, 1998).
Researchers also found out that Zone of Proximal Development or the ZPD,
conceptualized by Lev Vygotsky, also has an association in the learning of the
dancers. The common conception of the zone of proximal development
presupposes an interaction between a more competent person and a less competent
person on a task, such that the less competent person becomes independently
proficient at what was initially a jointly-accomplished task (Chaeklin, page 2). The
interaction between a more competent person to a less competent one have a direct
impact on the latter on a specific field. Relating this aspect to the present study, it
was evident that the dance masters and all the dance learners achieved harmony in
order to finish a common task. In addition, people who have the willingness to learn
or have the properties of the learner can focus on the task at hand. The
participants interest to learn dancing has made a significant effect on dance
performance in the present study. Their interest in dancing facilitated easier
understanding of instructions and lessons given by the dance masters. They have
ruled out the way in which it was delivered; that is, despite the autocratic style of
coaching shown. Apparently, their readiness to learn inspired them to further their
knowledge and skills in dancing.
The limitations of this study provide some opportunities for future research. In this
study, there was limited number of participants with only fourteen (14) college
students. Age range was also limited to 16-19 years of age. Greater number of
participants and another set of age range must be considered to generate better data
and results. It will be of interest to employ a comparative study on the effect
coaching styles on dance performance with age ranges as its point of comparison.
Additional leadership styles in the future studies may provide more evidences to
prove the effect of leadership style in dance performance. Thus, to enhance
generalizability of findings, future research should examine how learning goal
orientation and different genre of dance relate to leadership styles.
Conclusions
Coaching style is an important factor for leaders of dance groups. This serves as
their guide in instructing dance routines and providing motivation to their group to
improve the performance. Based from the results, autocratic coaching style is an
effective way to enhance performance of individuals who are still on the initial
stages of skills development. Therefore, to facilitate beginners dance skills, a dance
master should display a directive approach in delivering instructions. Beginners
consider their master as a competent person who will most likely lead them to
betterment. And so, they show effortless obedience to instructions. Alternatively,
References
Amorose, Anthony J. & Horn, Thelma S. (2000). Intrinsic Motivation: Relationship
With Collegiate Athletes Gender, Scholarship Status, and Perceptions of their
Coaches Behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 63-84.
Cross, N., & Lyle, J. (1999). The coaching process: principles and practice for sport.
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay
between procedural fairness, sense of self, and cooperative behavior. In M. Zanna
(Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 37 (pp. 151218).New York7
Academic Press.
De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2004). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership
effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 140 155.
Ely, K., Boyce, L. A., Nelson, J. K., Zaccaro, S. J., Hernez-Broome, G., &Whyman, W.
(2010). Evaluating Leadership Coaching: A Review And Integrated Framework. The
Leadership Quarterly, 21(4), 585-599.
Fink, B., Weege, B., Flgge, J., Rder, S., Neave, N., & McCarty, K. (2012). Mens
Personality And Womens Perception Of Their Dance Quality. Personality and
Individual Differences, 52(2), 232-235.
Hannus, A., &Laev, M. (2011). Motives and motivating leaders in aerobic classes:
Exercise motivation and instructors leadership characteristics.
ActaKinesiologiaeUniversitatisTartuensis, 17.
Kelly, J. R., &Barsade, S. G. (2001).Mood and emotions in small groups and work
teams.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99 130.
Khalaj, G., Khabiri, M., &Sajjadi, N. (2011). The relationship between coaches
leadership styles & player satisfaction in women skate championship. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 35963601.
Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V., Miller, S. (2003).Vygotskys educational theory
and practice in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved
from:http://people.ucsc.edu/~gwells/Files/Courses_Folder/documents/chaiklin.
zpd.pdf
Lafrenire, M., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R., &Carbonneau, N. (2011). Passion for
coaching and the quality of the coacheathlete relationship: The mediating role of
coaching behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 144-151.
Sosik, J. J. & Dinger, S. L. (2007) Relationships between leadership style and vision
content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need
for social power. The Leadership Quarterly 18 (2007) 134153
Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S., Hart, M., & De Cremer, D. (2004) Autocratic leadership in
social dilemmas: A threat to group stability, 81, 130-135
The bulk of statistics around the world consistently confirms that teaching
profession is predominantly held by the feminine gender. Congruently, growing
concerns assert that boys have been continuously under performing in schools as
compared to girls. This pattern of results led to the assumption that boys
underperformance is due to the underrepresentation of men in the teaching
profession. As such, policies have being recommended to increase recruitment of
male teachers in countries like UK, Australia, USA, Finland and New Zealand
(Carrington, Francis, Hutchings, Skelton, Read, & Hall, 2007). As a result,
research in education and gender which were previously much focused on
gender differences in student achievement, has been diverted to the effect of
teacher gender on student achievement. The present study is a contribution to
the existing researches on the impact of teacher gender on student achievement
examining the fundamental question of whether men or women are more
suitable to teach in primary grades.
The increasing trend shows that the number of female teachers will soon
outweigh the number of male. The primary education is a sensitive issue for a
country. To ensure the quality of education should be the priority rather than
providing the platform for the backward section of people. That is because only
quality teachers can ensure the quality education (Hoque et al., 2010).
Recently, there have been several arguments that boys under achievement in
education is due to female dominance in the teaching profession (Driessen, 2007;
Carrington & McPhee, 2008; Skelton, 2002). The underlining argument for this is
that lack of male role models could have negative consequences for the
achievement and behaviour of boys (Driessen, 2007). If the argument is true, it
indicates that immediate steps are necessary in order to ensure gender equity in
education. As the statistics for gender representation in teaching profession and
also the gender gap in student achievement in Bangladesh is consistent with the
rest of the world, it became necessary that such a study be conducted in the
context of Bangladesh.
1.2 Objectives
The specific objectives intended to achieve by this research are:
To find out whether there is any difference in the performance of men and
woman in teaching to primary grades.
To examine if matching or differentiating the gender of the students from that
of the teachers would bring in any significant change in student performance.
Since mid 1990s the studies were found to be increasing focused on the concerns
of feminizing the education especially in the primary which led to such
arguments as under representation of male teachers lead to lack of male role
models in education and hence lower boys performance (Driessen, 2007). In this
section, the findings of these studies are presented under three subheadings (1)
those studies which focused on finding the effect of matching teacher and
student gender, (2) those which focused on teachers gender and its impact on
student achievement, and (3) those which focused on gender differences in the
types of relationships between teachers and students.
The vast majority of studies in this line of research are concentrated in Britain
due to the recommendation of the policy makers to increase recruitment of male
teachers owing to the assumption that boys under achievement in education is
caused by underrepresentation of men in teaching. Almost all studies, however,
find contrary evidence to the policy recommendation that matching students
with the gender of the teachers does not necessarily bring in any positive
outcomes in student performance.
The study by Carrington et al., (2007) reported results which are contrary to the
famous policy recommendation. In this qualitative study, the researchers
interviewed 300 elementary school students in England in order to understand
their perception of better teachers whether males or females. The study
revealed that the gender of teachers had little apparent effect on the academic
motivation and engagement of either boys or girls. Instead, students value
teachers who were consistent and supportive regardless of their gender.
Research with similar types of designs in Holland confirmed that teacher sex has
no affect whatsoever on the achievement, attitudes or behaviour of pupils
(Driessen, 2007). The policy of recruiting more men into primary education to
ensure demonstration of male role models has also been criticized by Jones
(2003). By exploring the views of female teachers in the primary, the study
concluded that recruiting more males should not necessarily improve boys
performance.
The researchers postulated that the recruitment process should rather be focused
on selecting the right kind of men. Similarly, the study by Skelton, (2002) also
reported that both students and teachers reject the notion that students perform
better when matched by the teachers gender. Moreover, it was reported that the
abilities of the individual teacher is more important than gender and sort of
student teacher relationships (Francis, Skelton, Carrington, Hutchings, Read, &
Hall, 2008). Although the majority of the researches report that gender matching
does not necessary improve student performance, there are yet some studies
which indicate positive impacts of gender matching. The study by Carrington &
McPhee (2008) examined the commonly held belief that the gender gap in
achievement stems from the shortage of male role models in teaching, especially
at primary level. The researchers were much attracted by the existing literature
on the influence of teacher gender on classroom interaction and educational
outcomes which argue that students perform better when taught by teachers of
the same gender. The(Carrington & McPhee, 2008) study found that the majority
of those interviewed believe that increasing the number of male teachers would
ultimately serve to reduce the gender gap in achievement by increasing boys
academic engagement.
Other studies also found results supporting positive effects of gender matching.
It has been reported that assignments of a same gender teacher significantly
improves the performance of both boys and girls (Lam et al., 2010). The study by
Dee (2007) investigated the prevailing beliefs that gender gap in student
Quite a number of studies have been conducted in this line of research. In this
regard, after a collaborative study of 180 struggling boy readers in Grades 3 and
4 over a 10-week period, four professors from the University of Alberta and the
University of Winnipeg (Canada) concluded that these students performed
better when taught by a female teacher (ORegan, 2007). Although it is concluded
as such the authors also highlighted some of the other factors such as the
teaching materials used, the interest level of the students towards the subject, the
family background and socio-economic status of the students and so on which
could have some impact on student performance.
Interestingly, all the 180 students who were chosen to participate in this
programme were from low socio-economic status backgrounds, improved their
performance regardless of teachers gender although students from the female
teachers were found to be more confident in reading. Karieg (2005) explored the
impact of student and teacher gender differences on standardized tests using a
large set of data on a longitudinal basis. This study reported three interesting
findings: (1) boys perform worse and obtained less scores on maths, reading and
writing as they move from third grade to fourth grade, (2) students of male
teachers perform worse as compared to those of female teachers regardless of
students gender, (3) there is no significant difference between the performance
of boys and girls of male teachers. Out of these findings, the final one is in strong
support of what has been largely found by the researches on the impact of
gender matching.
After interviewing with a number of students (Myhill & Jones, 2006) found out
that on one hand teachers of either gender tend to treat boys negatively as
compared to girls while one the other and they also expect girls to perform
better both in terms behaviour as well as academics. Based on this, it is more
logical to appeal that boys underperformance is due to differential treatments
between boys and girls rather than being taught by a female teacher. The study
also found out that male teachers tend to be biased by gender whereas female
teachers are perceived to be less influenced by gender expectations. A large scale
study done in Hong Kong with 148 primary teachers and 4867 grade 4 pupils
found that students of both gender perform better when taught by woman
(Lamet al, 2010). This study found contrary evidence to those studies which
report that boys perform better when taught by men. The findings of a
longitudinal study in Mexico showed results consistent with many other
researches that there is evidence that students of female teachers perform
comparatively better than those of males (Luschei, 2011). The researcher,
however, argue that this does imply that male teachers are less effective rather
it could be due to some other related factors.
The studies reviewed so far depict that females are somewhat better than males
in teaching to primary students. Nevertheless, a fair number of studies have in
fact found contrary evidence to this. A study conducted for year 3 elementary
school pupils and their teachers revealed that both students and teachers
perceive that the gender of the teachers does not matter as such with regard to
student motivation and interactions, and consequently the performance of the
students as well (Skelton, Carrington, Francis, Hutchings, Read, & Hall, 2009).
The majority of the respondents believe that it is the traits and qualities of the
teacher that play a more significant role than gender stereo-types.
The gender differences in the interactions between students and teachers have
been an interesting line of research on the topic. The vast majority of existing
literature suggests that male and female teachers demonstrate different
behaviour in their classroom interactions with the students. In this regard,
females are found to be more approachable, easy to communicate and
supportive whereas male teachers are found to be more strict and authoritative
(Meece, 1987). A study by (Rodriguez, 2002) which involved a survey of teachers
indicates that male teachers are likely to select a more aggressive disciplinary
approach toward boys. The study also reported that teachers of both gender
tend to consider minor disruptive behaviour of girls than that of boys.
Responses from teachers who took part in the Hong Kong study suggest that
male teachers are more authoritarian, prefer to control pupils learning, engage
pupils in whole-class reading and like to read passages aloud while pupils
follow the text (Lam et al, 2010). The same study found contrasting styles of
interactions from female teachers where they prefer to teach reading in groups,
to group pupils according to reading ability, set tasks that suit pupils stage of
learning, allocate more time for pupils to read books and use the school library
and encourage pupils to discover for themselves the meaning of new vocabulary
encountered in text. This gives strong support to the argument that differences
in student achievement is more due to differences in teacher abilities rather than
the gender of the teacher as such.
The type of interaction between teachers and students is believed to have some
impact on student motivation. This presumption is derived from the theories of
social learning and gender stereotypic model according to which boys do better
academically in classes taught by males and girls do better in classes taught by
females. However, academic motivation and engagement does not significantly
vary as a function of their teacher's gender, and boys do not fare any better with
male teachers than female teachers (Martin & Marsh, 2005).
2.4 Hypotheses
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The quantitative method of research was used for this study. According to
Creswell (2009) the quantitative methods determine whether the predictive
generalization of a theory or hypothesis is accurate. With this regard,
quantitative approach is any kind of research that is mainly used to test or verify
theories or explanations. Thus, it identifies variables to study and relate those
variables in questions or hypotheses by using statistical standards of validity
and reliability, and employ statistical procedures for analysis (Creswell, 2009). A
researcher who uses quantitative approach generally has a very clear idea about
what is being measured before they start measuring it, and their study is set up
with controls and a very clear outline (Keith, 1998). Since the aim of this research
is to find out whether man or women are more suitable for teaching in primary
schools, which is a gender comparison, T test was believed to be the most
appropriate.
T test is used when you have one nominal variable and one measurement
variable, and you want to compare the mean values of the measurement
variable. The nominal variable must have only two values, such as "male" and
"female" (McDonald, 2009).
This research uses secondary data (test scores) of primary grades for five
consecutive years which is obtained from a school in Bangladesh. Two classes
from grade four and two classes from grade five for a period of five years were
then selected by considering the gender of teachers who taught those classes.
Thus, this study engages a total of 1 school, 20 classes, 20 teachers and 504
students. Several criteria were considered in selecting the sample. The very
initial idea is to obtain data for minimum of five years to make the findings
accurate. Then the gender was considered in a way that tests the hypothesis as
accurately as possible where both male and female teachers contributed teaching
in these twenty classes during the sampled period. Grades 4 and 5 were chosen
particularly due to this reason as there were all female or male teachers for some
of the grades during the sampled period. Out of the seven subjects taught in the
primary, only mathematics marks is used in the research. This is so because on
one hand teacher gender has to be made as proportional as possible and on the
other hand because of the nature of this study.
enhancing the credibility of the research findings and interpretations. Such data
can be used to describe, understand and explain how things function at the
sample sites (Merriam, 1998). The quantitative data collected for this research
was obtained from a rural school located in the north province of People
Republic of Bangladesh. The school principal was first approached through
mobile phone to see the possibilities of obtaining the final mark sheets of their
primary grades (levels 1 -5) for five years period along with the gender of the
teachers who taught the specific subjects. Then, a phone call requesting for the
data from the specified grades were made to make the inquiry more formal. The
data was first provided for 2008, 2009 and 2010 due to unavailability of data in
spread sheet format.
However, upon a further request for the scanned copies of the data for 2006 and
2007, was later forwarded through email after compiling them in the spread
sheet format. A further request was sent to one of the leading teacher through
another phone call and a reminder was sent through a mobile text message as
the data lacks the gender of the teachers who taught the various subjects for the
primary grades classes during the sampled time period, i.e. from 2006 to 2010.
There are many advantages and disadvantages in using secondary data. The
obvious advantages in this case were the cost and time. This study used the final
mark sheets of the above school for a period of five years. Although the initial
design was to include all primary scores, due to limitations in obtaining data the
study was narrowed down to grades 4 and 5 and also to one subject, that is
Mathematics. The school mark sheets were the 5 years records of their students
marks obtained in all the subjects of which Mathematics marks were chosen
and there is no manipulation of the research setting necessary with this.
academic achievement of the students and the gender of the teachers, the
validity of the data is pursued as the data is documented for their own purpose.
As suggested by Cohen, Manion, & Morrison (2007), the standards and criteria
of validity and reliability is considered as authenticity and credibility of the data.
The data (students test mark) obtained was produced from the students test
scores of various years which was printed in the students progress report. In
Bangladesh, primary schools provide students marked answer scripts back to
the students which they can take home where parents can go through and reflect
and compare with the students progress report. This pursues the issue of
authenticity and credibility. In this context the data is very dependable as there
is no manipulation and control of any variable as the data were produced and
obtained for internal and official purpose of the school.
3.6 Limitations
As the research is basically conducted by analysing students, academic
achievement and gender of the teachers who taught them, a very fore fronted
limitation is that the research does not address the other factors that might
influence students, academic achievement. This includes the ability levels of the
selected students sample, socio economic background of the students,
competency level and pedagogical knowledge of the teachers, and instructional
support by the grade supervisors. Another limitation of the research is that it
does not consider the lower grades (grades 1 to 3). Moreover, there is no attempt
made to relate it to the other subjects since it is only the marks of Mathematics
which is taken into account. As such, the researchers do not claim to generalise
the findings to other subjects and even to the primary schools.
4.0 FINDINGS
Two research questions have been set out to achieve the objectives of this study.
The first question was targeted to examining class averages (boys and girls
mixed) based on teachers gender. The second question was aimed at refining the
finding by examining the impact of teacher gender on student performance
(gender wise). This chapter reports the findings for each of these questions.
Even though men are known to perform better when referring to the arithmetic
means, it is also necessary to find that the difference is statistically significant.
Independent sample t test was performed for this purpose and the result is
shown in table 4.2. Since that significance value is .176 (p > .05) the null
hypothesis has to be accepted. Therefore, there is no significant difference
between male and female teachers based on the average of the class. Even
though men are known to perform better when referring to the arithmetic
means, it is also necessary to find that the difference is statistically significant.
Independent sample t test was performed for this purpose and the result is
shown in table 4.2. Since that significance value is .176 (p > .05) the null
hypothesis has to be accepted. Therefore, there is no significant difference
between male and female teachers based on the average of the class.
The independent sample t test confirms that the observed difference in mean is
statically significant as shown in table 4.4. Since the significance value is .017 (p
< .05) the null hypothesis can be rejected. Thus, in case of grade 5, there is a
significant difference between male and female teachers based on the average of
the class. The independent sample t test confirms that the observed difference in
mean is statically significant as shown in table 4.4.
Since the significance value is .017 (p < .05) the null hypothesis can be rejected.
Thus, in case of grade 5, there is a significant difference between male and
female teachers based on the average of the class. The independent sample t test
confirms that the observed difference in mean is statically significant as shown
in table 4.4. Since the significance value is .017 (p < .05) the null hypothesis can
be rejected. Thus, in case of grade 5, there is a significant difference between
male and female teachers based on the average of the class.
From the above table it shows that when compared against the average of boys,
male teachers performance was better than female teachers where the
performance of males is 54.16 and that of females is 51.00. Similarly, when the
averages for girls are compared it is also found that male teachers perform better
with an average of 58.67 whereas the mean for female teachers is 49.50. Hence,
when the teachers performance is measured against the difference in
achievement of boys and girls, in both the cases male teachers do better than
female teachers. There is no indication that the average performances of the
students when taught by teachers of alternative gender are better than the
average performances of the students when taught by the teachers of
corresponding gender.
Although differences were observed in the arithmetic means, the t test results for
the data show that the existing differences are not statistically significant (Table
4.8). Since the significant value for boys is .621 (p > .05), the null hypothesis has
to be accepted. Thus, there is no significant difference between male and female
teachers when the boys performance is considered. Similarly, since the
significant value for girls is .089, p > .05, the null hypothesis has to be accepted.
Therefore, there is no significant difference between male and female teachers
when the girls performance is considered
The t test was also performed to see if matching teachers gender with students
results in any significant difference. In order to do this, the results of boys and
girls are compared against the teachers gender. Table 4.9 shows the results of
this comparison.
As seen from table 4.9, there is no significant difference between boys and girls
irrespective of teachers gender. When taught by female teachers the significance
value is .75, p > .05 and for male teacher it is .43, p > .05. Hence, there is no
significant difference between male and female teachers whether teach to
students of same gender or otherwise.
Table 4.10 shows that when compared against the average of boys, male
teachers performance is better with an average of 45.17 whereas female teachers
produced an average of 35.50. Similarly, when the averages for girls are
compared it is also found that male teachers perform better with an average of
51.83while the mean for female teachers is 41.25. Hence, when the teachers
performance is measured against the difference in achievement of boys and
girls, in both the cases male teachers perform better than female teachers.
The results of t test when the indicated mean differences are analysed are shown
in table 4.11which shows that the significant for boys is .05, p = .05 and that for
girls is .032, p < .05. Therefore, there is a significant difference in average
performance of boys and girls when taught by teachers of alternative gender. As
seen from table 4.12, there is no significant difference between boys and girls
irrespective of teachers gender. When taught by female teachers the significance
value is .89, p > .05 and for male teacher it is .15, p > .05. Hence, there is no
significant difference between male and female teachers whether teach to
students of same gender or otherwise.
According to the table, the average performance of boys when taught by male
teachers is 49.67 and the mean is 43.25 when taught by females. This indicates
that by arithmetic mean male teachers are better in teaching to boys. When
comparing the averages for girls it is again found that male teachers are doing
better with an average of 55.25 whereas the mean for female teachers is
45.38.Hence, in the case of both boys and girls, male teachers perform better than
female teachers. Another indication is that girls have performed better than boys
when thought either by teachers of corresponding or alternate gender.
Table 4.14 Independent Sample T Test cross gender (Grade 4 and 5 combined)
Lev ene's t-test f or Equality of Means
Test for
Equality of
Variances
F Sig. t df Sig(2- Mean Std. error
tailed) Dif f Difference
erence
BOYSAVG .000 .998 1.410 18 .176 6.4167 4.55187
Equal 1.423 15.626 .174 6.4167 4.51026
variances
Assumed.
Equal
variances
not assumed
GIRLSAVG .050 .825 2.865 18 .010 9.8750 3.44622
Equal 2.969 16.848 .009 9.8750 3.32602
variances
Assumed.
Equal
variances
not assumed
The table 4.14 shows the significant for boys is .176, p > .05 and the significant
for girls is .010, P <.05. Therefore, there is a no significant difference between
males and females when the average performance of boys is considered, but
there is a significant difference between the genders when the girls average is
taken into account.
Table 4.15 Independent Sample T Test same gender (Grade 4 and 5 combined)
Lev ene's t-test f or Equality of Means
Test for
Equality of
Variances
Teacher F Sig. t df Sig(2- Mean Std. error
gender tailed) Diff Difference
erence
Female Equal 1.140377 0.303641 -0.50813 14 0.619271 -2.125 4.181966
male variances 1.100753 0.30549 -1.4967 22 014868 - 3.73042
assumed 5.58333
As seen from table 4.15, there is no significant difference between boys and girls
irrespective of teachers gender. When taught by female teachers the significance
value is .62, p > .05 and for male teacher it is .15, p > .05. Hence, there is no
significant difference between male and female teachers whether teach to
students of same gender or otherwise.
5 .0 DISCUSSIONS
For the research question one which was aimed at studying if there is any
difference between male and female teachers when their performance is
measured in terms of the class averages, the results show that although men
seem to be performing better as compared to women, this difference is not
statistically significant. Our results for this part are in contrary with many other
studies around the world. Many of the previous researches found that females
are better in teaching to primary for both boys and girls (Karieg, 2005; Lam et al,
2010; Luschei, 2011). It is anticipated that this difference in finding is due to
other factors which might affect student achievement rather than the teachers
gender itself. In fact a number of researches which found that females do better
also admitted the fact that it may not be the gender which is the key factor
having the most impact on student performance, rather other factors such as
teaching materials used, interest level of the students towards the subject, family
background and socio-economic status (ORegan, 2007).
One of the most important factors which could override the gender differences
that is reported by the referred studies is the teacher qualification. Since in the
data collection there was no attempt made to collect information on teacher
qualification and experience, it is not possible to relate this to our findings.
However, it is quite clear that in this study despite the female dominance in
the teaching field elsewhere the number of male teachers is more than the
females. As such, the performance of female teachers is less significant due to
their underrepresentation in number.
As for the second research question, when the student results were analyzed
gender wise it is found that both boys and girls perform better when taught by
the male teachers. However, the statistical analysis proved that the difference is
not significant. This is to say that there is no difference in the performance
between male and female teachers with regards to the students genders.
Although the difference is not statistically significant, our findings stand against
the advocates that male primary school teacher has been variously regarded as
morally suspect (Tubbs, 1946), out of place (Kaplan, 1947), or someone who
should be actively dissuaded from making such a career choice (Levine, 1977).
When tested for the effect of same gender treatment, the study did not show any
significance between males and females meaning that the gender of the teacher
has no significant effect whether teaching to the students of the teachers gender
or otherwise.
Therefore, as far as the analysis from the fourth grade is concerned the gender of
the teacher seems to be having no significant effect in student performance. This
is supported by some studies that there is no need to struggle to improve male
recruitment since solid evidence is not established on this ground (Carrington et
al, 2008). In the past two decades many researchers have advocated that men
should play a role in primary teaching in order to counter the feminized
environment (Brophy & Good, 1973) or to help break down traditional gender
stereotypes by acting as role models (Greenburg, 1977). According to Connell
(1996) this provides a conceptual framework derived from research into the
education of boys which clearly points to the need for such male role models in
primary schools. However, our study did not support such arguments.
Unlike the widely held beliefs and most of the research findings in this area, the
results of the grade 5 data in this research show a significant difference between
the performances of the students in relation to teachers gender. This research
shows that performances of male teachers are better than females for both boys
and girls. One such contrary findings to this research as highlighted in the
literature reveals that female teachers performance is better than male teachers
in standardized tests (Karieg, 2005). Another study done in Honhg Kong by Lam
et al. (2010) also shows that students performances are better with female
teachers.
The results of t-test which show a significance value of .050 for boys and .032 for
girls can be interpreted as there is a significant difference between the average
performance of boys and girls when taught either by male or female teachers. A
corresponding result was produced from the views of primary teachers by Jones
(2003) is concluded as improvement in boys performance is not with man but
may be with the right kind of men. This could be due to the way boys and
girls interact with teachers are different where teachers are more tally with their
students of corresponding gender (Carrington et al, 2007).
In association with students gender and teachers gender, results of t-test show
that there is no significant difference between the gender match among teachers
and students with the students achievements. Similarly, Skelton (2002) has
found that gender match does not make any difference in student performance.
The study by Dee (2007) investigated the prevailing beliefs that gender gaps in
student outcomes are a result of interactions between teachers and students.
Alternatively, the study by Carrington et al (2007) revealed that the gender of
teachers slightly impact the students of sexes in terms of their academic,
motivation and engagement in studies.
According to the findings of the present study, it could be said that although
women might be better in certain kind of relationships and being with children
due to their mother nature, they might not do so in terms of academic
achievement of students. However, it is also acknowledge the fact that although
in this study men are found to do better, it cannot be argued that it is the gender
which had the greatest impact but rather other factors of teaching and learning
could have had a greater impact (ORegan, 2007). The finding from grade four
results stand in strong support of this argument where it is shown that there is
no significant difference between male and female teachers. The combined
analysis shows that in case of boys there is no significant difference between
male and female teachers. However, in case of the performance of girls, it is
found that they perform better when taught by male teachers.
When analyzed for the effect of same gender on student achievement, the results
show that matching teachers gender with that of the students does not results in
a significant change in student achievement. This means that it does matter
whether boys are taught by women or girls are taught by men. The finding is
consistent with the finding of many other previous studies, all of which reported
that there is no need to struggle hiring male teachers just to compensate for boys
under achievement (Carrington et al, 2007; Driessen, 2007; Jones, 2003; Francis et
al, 2008; Skelton, 2002). Therefore, it would be better to focus on teacher qualities
and school facilities which enhance students understanding rather than merely
debating about teachers gender. Both genders are motivated equally in liking
children, being willing to serve the school system (Seifert, 1985), but in this
situation male teachers produced more productive result in the students
performance rather than female teachers.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Since the statistics for teacher gender in Bangladesh is similar to the pattern
around the world it was anticipated that the findings of the study will also be
similar to other findings where the majority of literature on gender differences in
teaching to primary grades show that females are better as compared to males.
However, comparing the test scores this study found that men are better in
teaching to primary. Despite this contrary evidence, when the data was analysed
for the impact of same or opposite gender the study revealed mixed evidences.
So it does not support any of the prevailing arguments whether students have to
be taught by teachers of same gender or opposite gender. Base on the various
analyses, it is concluded that teacher gender is of less importance than other
factors as far as student achievement in test scores are considered. This is
supported by a number of similar studies. In this regard, Jones (2003) concluded
that instead of debating on teachers gender as such, it is more logical to focus on
choosing the right kind of candidates. Moreover teacher personality and
quality are largely considerable than gender stereo-type in the achievement of
the students (Skelton et al., 2009).
References
Azza, F., & Aishath, A. (2008): Education for all: Mid-dicade assessment - 2007. Male':
Ministry of Education. Brophy,
J. E. & Good, T.C. (1973): Feminization of American elementary schools. Phi Delta
Kappan, 54, 564-566
Carrington, B., & McPhee, A. (2008): Boys' 'underachievement' and the feminization of
teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34 (2), 109120.
Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Skelton, C., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2007): Does the
Gender of the Teacher Really Matter? Seven- to Eight-Year-Olds' Accounts of Their
Interactions with Their Teachers. Educational Studies, 33 (4), 397413.
Carrington, B., Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2008): Role Models, School Improvement and
the "Gender Gap"--Do Men Bring out the Best in Boys and Women the Best in Girls?
British Educational Research Journal, 34 (3), 315327.
Creswell (2009): Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods Approaches.
New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Connell, R.W. (1996): Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender
strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98(2), 206-235
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) : Research Methods in Education, Sixth
Edition. Routledge: Madison Avenue, New York
Dee, T. S. (2007) : Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement. The Journal of
Human Resources, 3 (XLII), 528-554.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1995) : Do teachers' race, gender, and
ethnicity matter? evidence from the national educational longitudinal study of 1988.
Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48 (3), 547-561.
Francis, B., Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2008) : A
perfect match? Pupils' and teachers' views of the impact of matching educators and
learners by gender. Research Papers in Education, 23 (1), 2136.
Greenburg, M. (1977) : The male early childhood teacher: An appraisal. Young Children,
37, 34-37.
Hopf, D., & Hatzichristou, C. (1999) : Teacher gender-related influences in Greek schools.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (1), 1-18.
Hoque KE, Alam GM, & Abdullah AGK (2010) : Impact of teachers professional
development on school improvement: an analysis at Bangladesh standpoint. Asia Pacific
Educ. Rev., DOI 10.1007/s12564-010-9107-z. In press.
Jones, D. (2003) : The right kind of man: The ambiguities of re-gendering the early
years school environment the case of England and Wales. Early Child Development and
Care, 173 (6), 565575.
Karieg, J. M. (2005): Student Gender and Teacher Gender: What is the Impact on High
Stakes Test Scores? Current Issues in Education [On-line], 8 (9).
Kaplan, L. (1947): The status and functions of men teachers in urban elementary
schools.Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
Lam, Y. H., Tse, S. K., Lam, J. W., & Loh, E. K. (2010): Does the gender of the teacher
matter in the teaching of reading literacy? Teacher gender and pupil attainment in
reading literacy in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education (26), 754759.
Levine, J.A. (1977): Redefining the child care problem: Men as child nurturers. Child
Education, 54, 55-61.
Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005, November): Motivating boys and motivating girls: does
teacher gender really make a difference? Retrieved April 04, 2011, from Australian Journal of
Education (online version): http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-
5013070/Motivating-boys-and-motivating-girls.html
McCandless, B. R., Bush, C., & Carden, A. I. (1976): Reinforcing contingencies for sex-role
behaviors in preschool children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1 (3), 241-246.
McDonald, J. H. (2009): Handbook of Biological Statistics (2nd ed). Maryland, USA: Sparky
House Publishing.
MDP Alliance. (2008): Aneh Dhivehiraajje: Polcies of the MDP alliance. Retrieved February
23, 2011, from http://voteanni.com/aneh_dhivehi_raajje_manifesto.pdf
Merriam, S. (1998): Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. London: Jossey-
Bass.
Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2006): 'She doesn't shout at no girls': pupils' perceptions of gender
equity in the classroom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36 (1), 99113.
ORegan, B. (2007, August 27): Females better at teaching reading to boys: Study. Retrieved
February 10, 2011, from http://www.nowpublic.com/females-better-teaching-reading-
boys-study
Seifert, K. (1985). Career experiences of men who teach young children. Canadian
Journal of Early Childhood Education,1, 65-74.
Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2009): Gender
matters in the primary classroom: pupils and teachers perspectives. British Educational
Research Journal, 35 (2), 187204.
Stake, J., & Katz, J. (1982): Teacher-Pupil Relationships in the Elementary School
Classroom: Teacher-Gender and Pupil Gender Differences. American Educational Research
Journal (19), 465-471.
Tubbs, E.V. (1946): More men teachers in our schools. Schools and Society, 63, 394.
Chris Abrahams
University of Johannesburg
South Africa
Abstract. The aim of the article is to illustrate how using Problem Based
Learning, together with the way in which the content is facilitated,
prepares educationally under prepared students in an extended
National Diploma over a four year period. A descriptive, exploratory
study was undertaken using quantitative data derived from two cohorts
of first-year students who enrolled in 2008 for the National Diploma in
Construction Engineering and Extended National Diploma in
Construction Engineering at a comprehensive university. The results of
the extended national diploma shows that with adequate exposure to
PBL success can be obtained for students who have not been previously
exposed to science and the field of construction engineering. Through
this process students are taught to discard old habits and to work
accurately. By doing so, they realise the importance of quality work on a
construction site. PBL ensures a closer relationship with the lecturer is
developed and as a result students in the course feel free to ask
questions and clarify understanding in order to make meaning of the
problem. This article adds to the existing strategies to support
educationally under-prepared students who are enrolled for extended
programmes.
Introduction
have the required skills to work in a laboratory or engage effectively with tasks
in the fields of mathematics and science. Mathematics and science teachers of
schools in disadvantaged communities, as a result of their own level of
knowledge and skills (Scott, Yeld & Hendry 2007, p. 42), are often not able to
produce learners who perform well in these subjects. Consequently these
students either do not meet the minimum standard required for access to
selection programmes like engineering, or if they register for such a programme,
they struggle to persist and attain an engineering qualification. This has placed
the responsibility on higher education institutions to develop a learning
environment that will maximise the potential of under-prepared students.
Although some students may enter higher education with a history of low
achievement, this is not necessarily related to their capacity to benefit from
higher education in the future (Haggis, 2006, p. 527). Haggis further agrees that
the relationship between the lecturer and the student within the learning
environment is central to the development of under-prepared students. Recent
studies from several different countries have shown that teacher conceptions of
and approaches to teaching correlate strongly with both students deeper
approaches to learning and their learning outcomes (Biggs, 2007; Entwistle &
Smith, 2002; Prosser &Trigwell, 2002; Trigwell, Prosser and Waterhouse, 1999 in
British Journal of Educational Research 2011). In response to the low graduation
rates of students entering university in South Africa (Scott, Yeld& Hendry 2008,
p. 9), higher education institutions have introduced new teaching and learning
methodologies to foster the relationship between lecturers and students.
The aim of the article is to illustrate how using Problem Based Learning,
together with the way in which the content is facilitated, prepares educationally
under-prepared students in an extended National Diploma over a four year
period to complete successfully on par with students who were admitted to the
National Diploma which is constituted over a three year period in the field of
construction engineering.
Theoretical Framework
With very little exposure to construction work and sites, many under-prepared
students have minimal understanding of what construction engineering is about
and what it can offer them in terms of career opportunities. Without the correct
introduction to the discipline as well as continuous relevant academic support
these students may never experience success in higher education. Although the
focus has shifted away from the deficient student in higher education
institutions (Jacobs & Miller, 2002, p. 85) to how the practices, staff and
curriculum of institutions should change in order to meet the distinct needs of
non-traditional students, these needs still must be identified. Without full
awareness of the problems students experience with regard to the study of
construction engineering, a relevant and effective approach to teaching and
learning is not possible. The development needs of under-prepared students are
multifaceted and complex. They include factors such as difficulty to understand
abstract concepts, insufficient academic language proficiency, a lack of effective
study and learning approaches together with misconceptions in subject
knowledge (Scott, Yeld & Hendry 2007, p. 42). It is necessary to ensure that
innovative pedagogical strategies and teaching methodologies that encourage a
deep approach to learning (Biggs2007) are employed to develop skills and
competencies required for meaningful learning in higher education (HE).
A number of studies (Scott, Yeld & Hendry 2007, p. 42; Pretorius2005) have
shown that the level of many South African students basic reading and writing
skills and their ability to write in the style of the discipline do not meet the
requirements of HE. This contributes to their learning problems, because they
are not always able to understand the language and subject-specific language of
the learning material, this also applies to understanding construction
engineering text books. Students are often second-, third- or fourth-language
English speakers. If no support is provided it could be difficult for students to
master the contents of these text books.
Krause (2006, p. 8) emphasises meeting students where they are and the need for
scaffolding content in order to close the articulation gap that students come
with from high school when entering higher education. Learning is meaningful
only if the integration of previous and new knowledge is part of the learning
process(Clayton 2006, p. 197). If students are studying in the construction
engineering field implies that they will gain an understanding of construction
terminology.
Students experience difficulty in applying the theory that they have learnt in
class to real-life and business situations. In a Problem Based Learning setting,
the boundaries between the facilitator and the participant are noticeably
reduced. This provides opportunities for the participant to feel free to raise
pertinent questions to challenge existing issues in relation to a Problem Based
Learning problem (Lahteenmaki 2001).The method of teaching used in Problem
Based Learning allows hands-on application of theory and exposure to the field.
As the Problem Based Learning class commences the lecturer will explain to the
class in construction engineering an exercise they would have to do as part of
Step 1:
Step 2:
To facilitate Problem Based Learning the lecturer provides students with the
theory of a building site and how the underlying principles must be used to set
out different constructions on a real building site. During this time students are
afforded the opportunity to ask questions as well as to clarify their
understanding of important terminology. Throughout the teaching of
construction theory the lecturer is required to support the construction students
so as to ensure that they increase their understanding of fundamental principles
of the construction field. It is also an opportunity for students to address
misconceptions that they might have developed in school or as a result of a lack
of understanding. The role of the lecturer within the teaching and learning
environment is to create a learning environment that supports the learning
activities that are appropriate to achieving the desired learning outcomes (Biggs,
2007).
Once the theory is taught, the lecturer applies what the students have learnt in
theory to practice by developing and building an application model.
Lahteenmaki (2001) emphasises that that this process is essential since it
provides opportunities for the participant to feel free to raise pertinent questions
related to the problem at hand. The lecturer brings all the necessary resources to
class and proceeds to build the model. The lecturer uses questioning techniques
to clarify understanding, to establish what the students know and to find out
whether they are able to build the model on their own. Furthermore, the
construction terminology associated with building the model is clarified. In this
way the lecturer can ascertain if through their teaching and learning practice,
students are able to make meaning of the field of construction. Problem Based
Learning is a form of group mentoring and is defined by Barkham (2005) as a
process through which a career may be guided, beginning with induction into a
profession or institution through to progress and promotion with positive
outcomes not only for individuals involved, but also for their universities or
organisations. Through Problem Based Learning, lecturers are the most
important change agents in their own setting and it is vital that they should feel
that they have control over their situation (Knight & Trowler, 2009).
Step 3:
After the teaching of construction theory, the lecturer must identify the students
learning outcomes by assessing how they have applied and adapted the course
content to reach a viable solution to the problem in the exercise given. An
example of an exercise given to construction engineering students is seen in
Exhibit 1.
In the sketch provided to you as a group, the building lines of a gazebo are
shown which has three walls. The one-brick wall is built on a 680 wide strip
foundation. Draw the given top view of the building lines to a scale 1: 20, as
well as the profile boards in position to mark off only the walls marked A
and B. Indicate the trench markings for the foundation trenches as dashed
lines.
course of the foundation wall. The use of a practical problem through Problem
Based Learning develops learning from a concrete experience where students
are able to reflect on existing facts to discover the different areas of the practical
problem (Yeo 2005).
Students are allowed to choose members of the class they wish to work with in a
group. The lecturer then provides them with the learning outcomes for the
exercise which the students are required to build while applying theory. Enger et
al.(2002) state as an example that students are given a task through Problem
Based Learning which challenges them to brainstorm and generate practical
solutions. They are also given the responsibility of taking charge of their own
learning, using the chosen problem in the exercise as a guide to decide, based
on the scope, how to approach the problem in the best possible way.
Step 4:
Students need to realise that they are required to be innovative and creative
when constructing assignments within the group they have chosen. This
prepares them for teamwork in the construction industry. Problem Based
Learning is prominent in human resource development, particularly in
leadership training, with curricula directed at independent and team learning
(Bridges and Hallinger, 2007). Since students are trained to be construction
managers, Problem Based Learning is a relevant method in construction
engineering. Rather than receiving a body of factual knowledge about the world,
students are understood as agents, actively negotiating their way in the world
(Yeo 2005).
Step 5:
opportunity to critically assess what they as students know and the manner in
which they have translated theory into practice. Feedback from the lecturer is
critical for the students and helps them to understand the construction context
and what is expected of them within the field of construction engineering.
Methodology
This descriptive study used quantitative data derived from two cohorts of first-
year students enrolled for the National Diploma in Construction Engineering
and Extended National Diploma in Construction Engineering at a
comprehensive university. The data was extracted from the University's
Management Information System and student record systems. The groups were
the 2008 cohort of students who were admitted to the extended National
Diploma in Construction Engineering and the 2008 cohort of students who were
admitted to the extended National Diploma in Construction Engineering. Each
student's record was analysed individually to see if they had already graduated
within the minimum required time or had lengthened their period of study
beyond the minimum duration of the programmes respectively or whether they
were still in the process of completing.
It was of interest to see that only 20(41%) students were able to complete the
extended national diploma in the allotted time. While a further 15(30%) added
an extra year onto the allotted time provided for the qualification. From the total
number of 49 students registered 15(30%) were unsuccessful and did not
complete their studies.
Discussion of Results
Enger et al. (2002) supports the closer relationship between the lecturer and
student as PBL provides opportunities for the participant to feel free to raise
pertinent questions to challenge existing issues. Enger et al. further mentions
that PBL gives students agency because they have the responsibility to take
charge of their own learning by deciding how to approach the chosen problem
in the exercise. By scaffolding theory through PBL, lecturers are able to assess
students gradual mastery of construction theory. Through working as a group
while solving the problem in the exercise, students consider various options and
understand how best to address the problem and find a solution to it. The PBL
methodology furthermore ensures that, students are given feedback which helps
them understand where they went wrong, how they can improve their
performance and how to master the problems in construction engineering.
Through the Problem Based Learning teaching methodology approach, students
are able to be reflective of their own practice and are taught to work accurately,
which is essential when working in a construction field.
Conclusion
The focus of this article is to show how innovative strategies can provide under-
prepared students with the required knowledge and skills to be as successfully
as mainstream students. To achieve this problem based learning was used in the
extended national diploma in construction engineering. The study shows several
benefits when applying Problem Based Learning in a construction engineering
programme. Further research should be conducted concerning the impact PBL
can have on the academic success of students who have registered in the
mainstream. Consideration could be given to gathering data from both extended
and mainstream student groups who had experienced PBL and compare the
benefits of this method in different contexts. To ensure academic success for
students from under-prepared backgrounds, teaching and learning should not
focus on the organisation of the content of the teachers knowledge for
transmission but rather on innovative teaching methodologies like Problem
Based Learning which can enable students to be successful in fields like
construction engineering.
Acknowledgements:
In memory of Mr Chris Abrahams who passed away tragically in 2013. Gone but
not forgotten.
References
Introduction
No doubt intellectual ability is an important factor in predicting teachers
success. But recent studies, however, have shown that a intelligence and
teaching experience is not entirely indicative of the teachers success in teaching
profession. Rather skills and teaching competency are essential ingredients to be
professional teacher. In todays world, teacher must develop the essential 21st
Century competencies. A teachers competency in 21st century according to
UNESCO (2008) is that a competent teacher should have firm knowledge of the
curriculum of his/her subject and to use technology into the curriculum. Formal
system of education depends on three components that are curriculum, student
and teacher. Teaching competency refers to the knowledge, attitude, skills and
self perception or the products that comes from by mixing these behaviors and
resulting in consistent pattern of behavior leading to the attainment of expected
outcomes. Teaching competency is the ability of a teacher manifested through a
set of overt teacher classroom behaviours which is resultant of the interaction
between the presage and the product variables of teaching within a social setting
(Rama, 1979).
Each teacher has different levels of skills, abilities and competencies due to their
different levels of teaching experiences and different educational background.
Based on these differences, they will display different sets of motivation,
commitment and engagement. Burgoyue (1993) employed a functional
perspective to define a competency as how the goals of organizations were best
achieved by improving members performance. Internationally and nationally,
different organizations require different types of competencies. According to the
New Mexico (USA) (2012) Public Education Department there are nine
indicators/competencies of teachers. National Council of Teacher Education
(1998) has identified ten competencies for making the teachers professionally
competent.
Methodology
Research Design
Sample
Adopting the non probability sampling technique, a sample of 100 teachers
(Male and Female) from government and private secondary schools (100 from
government schools and 50 from private schools) of Amritsar district was
selected for the purpose of the present investigation.
Tools Used
In the present study the following tools were used:
1. General Teaching Competency Scale (Passi and Lalita, 2011)
2. Emotional Intelligence Scale (Ayde, Pethe and Dhar, 2002)
Procedure
After finalizing the tools and receiving the consent of the principals, the teachers
of the government and private secondary schools were requested to fill the GTC
scale and EI scale without omitting any item. All the completed tests were used
for data analysis using statistical measures such as mean, standard-deviation, t-
test and Pearson's product moment correlation.
Comparison of Means
Hypothesis I
In order to test Hypothesis I, difference in the mean scores on the teaching
competency and emotional intelligence of teachers teaching in government and
private schools were calculated. The results are presented in table 1.
Private 50
127.80 15.413
teachers teaching in government and private schools. This means that the
teachers of both government and private schools are equally competent. Both
use new methods and techniques in the classrooms to enhance the teaching and
learning process. Thus the Hypothesis I (a) which states, There exists no
significant difference between teaching competency of secondary school teachers
teaching in different type of schools (government and private) is accepted.
Table 1 reveals the values of Mean and SD of emotional intelligence of teachers
teaching in government schools 132.20 and 10.60 respectively and those of
teachers teaching in private schools 127.80 and 15.41 respectively. The t-value
came out to be 1.664, which is insignificant, indicating that the type of school
does not play a defining role in the emotional intelligence of secondary school
teachers towards their job. The reason may be that the quality of any educational
institution depends mainly on the professional competence and emotional
stability of teachers. Unhappy, frustrated, dissatisfied teachers cannot help their
pupils to become happy and well adjusted young people. Emotionally stable
teachers are able to find out their own short comings and try to remove them so
that the students may be saved from the adverse influence of their unbalanced
personality.
Thus the null hypothesis, I (b) which states There exists no significant
difference between emotional intelligence of secondary school teachers teaching
in different type of schools (government and private) is accepted.
Hypothesis 2
Difference in the mean scores on the teaching competency and emotional
intelligence of male and female secondary school teachers was calculated. The
results are presented in table 2.
Table 2: Difference in mean scores of male and female secondary school teachers on
different variables
Table 2 depicts that the values of Mean and SD of the scores of teaching
competency of male secondary school teachers were 76.60 and 16.57
respectively and those of female teachers were 82.46 and 15.99
Table 2 depicts that the values of Mean and SD of the scores of emotional
intelligence of male secondary school teachers were 127.48 and 11.89
respectively and those of female teachers were 131.54 and 12.52
respectively. The t-value came out to be 1.663, which is insignificant. It
means that there exists no significant difference in emotional intelligence
of male and female secondary school teachers.
The above findings suggest that there is no gender influence on the
teaching competency and emotional intelligence of secondary school
teachers. Thus Hypothesis 2 which states that There exists no significant
difference between male and female secondary school teachers in relation
to their (a) teaching competency and (b) emotional intelligence is
accepted.
Correlational Analysis
Hypothesis 3
To find out correlation between teaching competency and emotional
intelligence of secondary school teachers, correlational analysis was
employed. The results are presented in table 3.
Teaching
Competency
0.885 98 Significant
Emotional
Intelligence
From table 3, the value of coefficient of correlation (r) came out to be 0.885 which
is significant at 0.01 level of confidence, indicating that there is a positive
correlation between teaching competency and emotional intelligence of
secondary school teachers, Thus the null hypothesis III which states There
exists no significant correlation between teaching competency and emotional
intelligence of secondary school teachers is rejected. This is due to the reason
that the success of teachers depends both on their emotional intelligence and
teaching competency. Emotional intelligence has been an important factor in
teaching learning process which demand teaching competency on the part of the
teacher. Teachers who are emotionally balanced and intelligent have the
capacity to generate new ideas and adopt new methods of teaching.
Conclusions
References
Ayde, A., Pethe, S., & Dhar, U. (2002). Emotional Intelligence Scale. Lukhnow: Vedant
publications.
Burgoyue, J. (1993). The competence movement: Issues, stakeholders and prospects.
Personnel Review, 22 (6), 6-13.
Chia, Y.M. (2005). Job offers of multi-national accounting firms: the effects of emotional
intelligence, extracurricular activities, and academic performance. Accounting
Education, 86 (7), 75-93.
Cooper, R.K., & Sawaf, A. (1998). Executive EQ: Emotional Intelligence in Leadership and
organizations. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.
Dhull, & Mangal, S. (2005). Emotional Intelligence its Significance for School Teachers.
EduTracks , 4 (11),11-16.
Goad, D. (2005). Emotional Intelligence and Teacher Retention. Unpublished raw data
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why it can Matter More Than IQ. New York:
Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998b). Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York, Bantam Books.
Holt, S., & Jones, S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and organizational performance:
Implications for performance consultants and educators. Performance
Improvement, 44 (10), 15-22.
Justice, M. (2005). Emotional Intelligence in Teacher Education and Practice. Unpublished
raw data presented at the 2005 Institute on Emotional Intelligence, Texas A&M
University-Kingsville. Kingsville: TX.
Kirch, D. P., Tucker, M. L., & Kirch, C.E. (2001). The benefits of emotional intelligence in
accounting firms. The CPA Journal, 71(8), 60-61.
Low, G. R., & D. B. Nelson (2005). Emotional intelligence: The role of transformative
learning in academic excellence. TEXAS STUDY Spring.
Palmer, B., & Stough, C. (2001). Swinburne University Emotional Intelligence Test.
Interim Technical Manual. Organistional Psychology Research Unit.
Passi, B.K., & Lalita, M.S. (2011). General Teaching Competency Scale. Agra: National
Psychological Research Cell.
Pradhan, R.K., Mathur, P., & Mishra, P.K. (2001). Managers health: Role of emotional
literacy and quality of life perception. Productivity, 42 (3), 454460.
Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S., & Richett A.E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing:
Representations of knowledge in teaching. In F Colderhead (Ed).
Exploring teachers thinking. Sussex: Holt, Rineheart and Wilson.Wilson, B.C.
and Corcoran, T.B. (1988). Successful Secondary School. London : Falmer Press.
UNESCO. (2008). ICT Competency Standards for Teachers. United Kingdom: University
Press