Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic Substation
ABB, Peenya Automation Philosophy
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 1
Rajiv Krishnan
ABB Limited, Bangalore
2007-04-26
rajiv.krishnan@in.abb.com
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 2
2007-04-26
GPS
Mimic Board RTU Master RTU Station HMI Station HMI Gateway
GPS
Sub-RTU Sub-RTU
Process
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 3
Level 4
NCC
Network Ctrl. Center
n The different levels
Release
Release
Level 3 n Control from remote (NCC)
RCS
Remote Ctrl.
n Control from the station level
Release
Bay Control Unit in remote Mode
Level 2
Bay Control Unit
n Local control via Control IED
Local Ctrl.
Open/
Close
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 8
2007-04-26
High reliable system components
n Star coupler
n No moving parts
n All connection via fiber optic
n Optional redundant power supply
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 11
2007-04-26
High reliable system components
Station
Coupler
Protection n Maintenance free
IED
Computer
/HMI n High availability
parts
2007-04-26
Architecture Aspects - Independent HMI
failed
failed n For a high reliable remote link
n Destructive human
manipulation on station PC will
not effect the remote link
Application
failed OK n Unmanned substations where
normally the operation is from
remote
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 13
2007-04-26
Architecture Aspects - Redundant HMI
OK
Applications
n For manned substations where the
station is mainly controlled from
the station HMI
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 14
2007-04-26
Architecture Aspects - Redundant Gateway
importance
2007-04-26
Architecture Aspects - Redundant Interbay Bus
n The interbay bus is the highest
reliable system component
n Makes only sense with redundant
gateways or station computer
n The cables of first and second
OK OK channel have to be routed
separately
OK OK OK
Application
n Redundancy makes only sense in a
harsh environment (e.g. when
always construction work is going
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 16
on)
2007-04-26
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 17
2007-04-26
Communication Aspects
Communication: Inter bay bus
n Typical situation in substation
n In normal situation the substation is more or less quiet: Some measurements will
change slightly
n During an operation: The amount of information exchanged is rather low, some
commands, some status indication changes, some changing measurements
n A trip happens e.g. busbar trip: Suddenly many status and measurement changes
appear DR are started and there is a need of transferring a lot of information in a
very short time
n ABB Solution: LON
n Event driven bus handles the event burst more efficient than cyclic polling buses
n Priority messages guarantee a defined and short response time for critical
messages
n The LON bus combines both parts and therefore fits perfectly to the requirements
for a SAS
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 18
n Control authority
NCC 1 NCC 2 NCC 3
n No priority: Station level and remote
control centre have the same priority
n Priority selection between station level
and NCC: All NCCs have the same
priority (Authority between the
different NCC has to be managed
directly between the NCCs)
n Differentiate priority between the
several NCCs: This will be handled in
the SAS only on special request, clear
description of the control handling
philosophy form customer side is
required
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 22
2007-04-26
Communication: Redundant Remote link
FBS
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 25
2007-04-26
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 26
2007-04-26
Availability
Increase of availability
MTBF
A=
MTBF + MTTR
Start Time
in Operation Repairs
MTBF: Influenced by
- Component selection
- Continuous monitoring
- Environment
- Redundancy
MTTR: Influenced by
- Time to locate failed module
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 28
Increase MTBF:
n High quality components and subsystems
n Reduce number of components
n Redundancy where it makes sense
n only critical system part should be designed redundant
n redundant parts means also higher costs in hardware and engineering
n redundant parts means also higher maintenance costs
n Distributed system architecture increases system availability
(system with graceful degradation or functional redundancy)
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 29
2007-04-26
Increase of availability
Reduce MTTR:
n Self supervision, diagnostics must be available
n Reduce repair time
n only with a short repair time a system increases the availability
significantly
n all parts also the redundant parts must be supervised. As a result of a
fault, the system will not crash, but must be repaired.
n to provide a very short repair time (without repairing) spare parts must
be available
n the time to repair will be reduced significantly if spare parts can be
replaced without any additional configuration work (e.g. hot-swap in
industrial server)
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 30
2007-04-26
Increase of availability
1
HMI
Station
2 PC
3
Interbay Bus
Starcoupler Starcoupler
(Redundant Power (Redundant Power
4 supply) supply)
8
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 32
16 x 400kV 18 x 220kV
Feeder Feeder
2007-04-26
Example Calculation
Example 2: Redundant HMI with single inter bay bus
1
HMI HMI
Station Station
2 PC PC
3
Interbay Bus
Starcoupler Starcoupler
(Redundant (Redundant
4 Power supply) Power supply)
8
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 33
16 x 400kV 18 x 220kV
Feeder Feeder
2007-04-26
Example Calculation
Example 3: Redundant HMI with redundant inter bay bus
1
HMI HMI
Workstation Workstation
2
Ethernet Ethernet
6 Switch Switch
Gateway Gateway
7 SC SC
Redundant
Interbay Bus
5 Intelligent Intelligent
Star coupler Star coupler
3
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 34
16 x 400kV 18 x 220kV
Feeder Feeder
2007-04-26
Example Calculation
Availability comparison
of systems with with repair no component repair
different redundant
components: Availability MTBF Availability MTBF
[%] [years] [%] [years]
Example 1 99.981 4.8 99.979 4.4
Example 2 99.998 52.6 99.988 7.5
Example 3 99.991 10.6 99.979 4.4
- complex architecture
- less reliable star coupler (intelligent)
2007-04-26
Conclusion
Redundancy Chart
Availability
MTBF for repair
Redundancy at the correct place
Costs
To increase the system availability
significant parts with the lowest MTBF
should be redundant first. More
components cause a shorter interval to
repair faulty parts and increases
investment as well as maintenance
costs.
number of redundant
components
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 37
2007-04-26
ABB Ltd. INPSS-SAS - 38
2007-04-26