Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jiana Ejbara
Professor Ditch
English 115
6 Decmeber 2017
Gender has and always will be a big part of how people view each other. This meaning
that based on the sex that you are born with, your actions will be affected by it . In the book
The Guernsey Literary Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrow, the
authors write about discusses how a group of people who started a society of writing letters to
each other. The book takes place in London in January 1946 after the ending of World War II.
The letters all started with Juliet Ashton, a well known writer who lost almost everything from
the war. Her publisher, Sidney Stark, published her writings and soon after many islanders began
sending letters to her. In the novel it gives many examples of characters both conforming to and
breaking from gender roles. Someone's gender will determine how todays society will expect
them to perform in everyday life. Men are expected to be strong and dominate while women are
expected to be weak And submissive. In the novel, Juliet Ashton conforms to gender roles while
Elizabeth McKenna both conforms and breaks free from her prescribed gender roles because
they both demonstrate feminine roles in addition to Elizabeth also demonstrating a masculine
role as well.
There are certain ways that one can conform to prescribed gender roles. Juliet conforms
to her prescribed gender roles when she is writing a letter and begins to have second thoughts
about sending a letter because she did not want Adelaide Addison to see the letter but regardless
Ejbara 2
of this Juliet still sent out the letter. In the book Rhetoric For Radicals by Jason Del Gandio he
states that Real radicals dont need to rehearse or craft their communication. It is somewhat true
that real radicals do not need to rehearse or craft their communication (Del Gandio 25). If you
are truly radical and want to break free from gender roles then you must say what you feel
without having to think about it. This shows Juliet not being radial and conforming to her gender
role. This letter shows how much Juliet was overthinking the letter and it shows her not being
very confident in herself. This is why it is an example of her not being radical because in
Rhetoric For Radicals it gives us examples of what it is to be radical and that is to always be
straightforward when it comes to talking about things. This letter shows Juliet conforming to her
gender role because she is being feminine by over thinking and showing that she is somewhat
insecure. In todays society these are all looked at as being a feminine person's traits and how
they would act. However, men are viewed as the complete opposite in todays world. This theory
is proven in Thinking About Women by Margaret E. Anderson when Anderson states Maybe
you have heard someone say, Thats just the way women are Biological explanations of gender
in society have a deep roots in peoples thinking, but, as you will see, there is not fixed
relationship between biological features of human beings and the social beings we become (22).
This claim shows that Juliet is conforming to her prescribed gender role because she is expected
to overthink because Thats just the way women are. These claims show that we simply base
each other's actions off of gender rather than off of the person themselves.
Being feminine can also be defined as being very sympathetic towards others. Juliet
continues showing her feminine side throughout the text, Del Gandio supports this claim by
saying that A big heart alone can change the world. But hearts dont speak, people do (24).
Ejbara 3
Juliet gives an example of this when Sidney breaks his leg and Sidney is very calm about it
whereas Juliet is a lot more sensitive and is way more concerned about Sidney's leg than Sidney
himself is. This gives an example of Juliet conforming to her gender role because she is
demonstrating the feminine act of being very caring while Sidney is demonstrating the act of
being masculine and not overreacting about breaking his own leg. Another way that Juliet
conforms to her gender roles is when she is talking about these two guys. She writes in a letter
that she has fallen in love with both Eben Ramsey and Dawsey Adams and that she is not very
sure of who she should chose. This is another way that Juliet conforms to gender roles because
she is discussing her feelings about these two men that she has fallen in love with and she is
conforming to her gender role because women are viewed as not knowing what they want and
for always being indecisive while men are seen as the complete opposite and are always looked
at as the gender that knows what they want. Aaron Devor, author of Becoming Members of
Society: The Social Meanings of Gender states A more even-handed description of the social
concerned with egoistic dominance and femininity as striving for cooperation or communion
(39). This differs from Juliet because she is unsure of what it is that she wants making it a
feminine act rather than a masculine performance. This results in her having a more feminine
Another character from The Guernsey Literary Potato Peel Pie Society that conforms to
prescribed gender roles is Elizabeth. However, Elizabeth conforms and breaks free from her
gender roles. One example of this is when John Booker is writing to Juliet and says that
Elizabeth thought of plans that he did not think of himself. This shows Elizabeth being radical
Ejbara 4
towards her gender role because she is making these plans that John Booker did not think of
himself. It is seen as she is the one that is taking control which is not seen as being feminine.
Being feminine is looked at as being submissive while taking action the way Elizabeth did, is
seen as being dominant which is more of a masculine trait than a feminine one. Aaron Devor,
author of Becoming Members of Society: The Social Meanings of Gender supports this
argument by stating These two clusters of attributes are most commonly seen as mirror images
of one another with masculinity usually characterized by dominance and aggression, and
femininity by passivity and submission (39). This further continues the argument that both
women and men are expected to act a certain way purely based off of their gender. In addition,
this shows that man can be viewed as feminine if they are being submissive and a female can be
viewed as masculine if she is dominate and taking charge which is a prime example of what
Elizabeth did. This giving Elizabeth the masculine trait which shows her breaking free from her
prescribed gender role rather than her sitting back and being submissive to allow the men to
In addition, to Elizabeth breaking free from her gender roles she also conforms to them.
Furthermore, a way that Elizabeth is seen as having a feminine gender role is when they are
discussing how Elizabeth was taking care of her baby. In the article Night to His Day: The
Social Construction of Gender by Judith Lorber, Lorder gives an example of this by stating that
In countries that discourage gender discrimination many major roles are still gendered; women
still do most of the domestic labor and child rearing (30). This claim gives evidence that women
are looked at as being the ones to still take care of the children and do the majority of the house
work. This is a reason why Elizabeth can be looked at as conforming to her gender role becauses
Ejbara 5
she is being motherly and taking care of a child. In addition the author of the book Full Frontal
Feminism, Jessica Valenti states Women are supposed to want to have babies. Its our
natural inclination (159). This gives the example that women are supposed to have the natural
instinct of wanting to have babies which is then looked at as being a feminine trait rather than a
masculine trait, showing that she is being feminine. These examples show Elizabeth both
conforming to her gender roles in addition to her also breaking free from her prescribed gender
In conclusion, Julie shows traits of her conforming to her gender role while Elizabeth
shows both traits of her conforming and breaking free from her gender role. Juliet and Elizabeth
give examples throughout The Guernsey Literary Potato Peel Pie Society of these traits through
their performances. They both show a feminine side while Elizabeth shows both a feminine side
in addition to showing a masculine side as well. This shows that women can be both submissive
and dominate in different spaces depending on the situation that they are put in. Both Elizabeth
and Juliet played quite a big role in the novel because Juliet can be considered the one who
started the letters and helped others find adventure along with finding it for herself. In addition,
Elizabeth can also be looked at as a big part of the book because Elizabeth tried coming up with
ideas that other people did not think of making her quite valuable person. Furthermore, both
Juliet and Elizabeth were looked at as being very kind hearted characters which helped them win
the trust of many characters in the book. This is important because both Juliet and Elizabeth
show that regardless of the gender that you are born with you can be both feminine and
masculine just depending on the situation and the space that you are in. This is why Juliet is a
Ejbara 6
prime example of what it looks like to conform to gender roles while Elizabeth gives an example
of what it is like to both conform and break free from prescribed gender roles.
Ejbara 7
Works Cited
Andersen, Margaret L. Thinking About Women: Sociological Perspectives on Sex and Gender.
Devor, Aaron. Becoming Members of Society: The Social Meanings of Gender. Composing
Gandio, Jason Del. Rhetoric for Radicals: A Handbook for 21th Century Activists. New Society
Publishers, 2008.
Lorder, Judith. Night to His Day: The Social Construction of Gender. Composing Gender,
Shaffer, Mary Ann, and Annie Barrows. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Social.
Valenti, Jessica. Full Frontal Feminism A Young Womans Guide to Why Feminism Matters.