Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. Batty
English 102
Children are always viewed as angels but have you ever thought that its just a mask to
cover up the real demon beneath it ?The look of innocence and purity can be the best mask for a
killer. The fact that many things in this world is unknown is the biggest fear we have knowing
we don't have the ability to control the unexpected In the book The Bad Seed by William March
is story about an eight year old little girl named Rhoda Penmark that is very mature and
intelligent for her age but has a secret bad side. She is use to getting whatever she wants till she
was finally left wanting something she can't have. She decided to kill and steal it back. The
question is how can an eight year old girl pull off such a heinous act without getting caught?
Would she be considered a Monster because of this ? When we think of monsters we think of big
ugly furry creatures under our bed and in the dark like in scary movies yet in our mind we can't
believe that a monster can have a face of an angel. This child in the book was a sociopath that
acted by anger and selfishness without any remorse lacking any human feeling towards her
victims. A monster is something that we believe is inhumane towards our society. Some kids
Valdivia 2
inherit an extremely fearless temperament that can be detected soon after birth, says Paul Frick, a
psychologist at the University of New Orleans who studies children with severe behavioral
problems. They seek danger and show no conscience, lacking empathy and guilt. They respond
emotionally to negative events-such as punishment or the distress of others--and they use people
for their own gain. Imagine a child tormenting a peer despite repeated scolding, or coolly
severing the tail of a shrieking cat just to see what will happen. Rhodas ability to kill without
remorse or even being scared to not knowing what she really has done shows more fear than any
monster under a bed. Yet many can say that kids have no knowledge in what's happening so they
can't be help accountable for what they do which wouldn't make them a monster but that they
She had everything a little girl would want but that wasn't enough it would never be
enough she needed more. Many could say that kids can't be described as a sociopath because
they're still learning. CHildren act upon what they view online, at home or on tv but truth is they
can be smarter than us sometimes. Rhoda covered up her crimes so well that no one knew what
real monster she was. Children are a creation of their family and their genes helping them be the
people they grow up to be. We don't know their past their present let alone their future but we
can only predict what we want it to be because we believe we can control the child's life. Little
did we know that children are much smarter than we think in an article in Children make up what
Valdivia 3
they want to believe because of things they see around their environment they create new ideas
and mentalities. Children are like sponges they suck up everything they can around them and
that's how they base off there life in. This brings up a bigger question and along with a bigger
issue. If children learn to be what they become arent the grown ups teaching them the real
monster? The creation of a monster isn't just mutations and everything you see in scary stories
but, also the things we create at home. In the story it was brought up that the nurture that was
given to Rhoda caused her to be what she was as a cold blooded murder. Her mother covered up
for her and did not view anything she did wrong which made her okay with continuing her
murdering. If Christine disciplined Rhoda differently there would have been less of selfless
attitudes towards the victims. She received everything she wanted but when she didn't she felt
some sort of way with anger and she had to release it. The story it said It seemed to her
suddenly that violence was an inescapable factor of the heart, perhaps the most important factor
of all - an ineradicable thing that lay, like a bad seed, behind kindness, behind compassion,
behind the embrace of love itself. Sometimes it lay deeply hidden, sometimes it lay close to the
surface; but always it was there, ready to appear, under the right conditions, in all its irrational
dreadfulness. She finally saw something that helped her with the anger she saw that getting rid
if her obstacles is the only way. At that moment people didn't really know what was going on,
who was the murderer and let alone the problem that cause the whole issue.
Valdivia 4
In the Story it also s we read that Rhoda's father was hardly in the picture that the
majority of the time it was just the women of the house. Maybe the lack of attention from her
father also caused her to be this way. Sh could have seen how careless he was towards the the
same way she's careless towards the people she killed. The majority of females need at least one
male figure to help create a different mentality than just the feminine ways. Making a mindset
unreasonable to rational thinking can mess up the whole growth of a person to know differences
Two people can be raised in the same environment but come out totally different. In the
book it seemed that Rhoda and her mom were raised in the same environment but they came out
totally different. Both were raised in a similar high class environment with loving and supporting
family.yet on one became a cold blooded murderer. Christine was adopted a young age so she
didn't really know her biological mother. They were both raised as only childs which couldve
caused a bigger impact to whether or not they are the way they are. In an article they described a
little girl just like Rhoda but she wasnt an only child She's sui generis, a freak of nature
masquerading as an angelic little girl of eight; surrounded by well-intentioned but foolish adults
who react to her outward, innocently beguiling behavior in mawkish, stereotypical ways that
must have given March, allegedly a hater of children (he was one of eleven siblings, and might
be said to have been an intimate observer of the genre child), a grim pleasure to record. The only
Valdivia 5
difference with all this was the amount of children in the research that was done. In this case they
all were raised in a similar environment but only one came out as the demon child. The monsters
we create we can't fix them although people may believe that kids can't be sociopaths for
example a psychiatrist says a charming little animal that can never be trained to fit into the
conventional patterns of existence Her mother sees in her evidence of a dawning realization that
some factor of body or spirit separated her from those around her." They say that maybe the kids
The monsters and demons we imagine within our dreams can come to life. The things we
don't imagine are the things that should scare us the most like the fact that an innocent child
could kill and ruin people's lives. All that is just hidden because our eyes see only what they
choose to see and they don't want to understand that many kids could ruin lives. Rhoda was just
an innocent girl from what we saw but that didn't change the fact she could ruin lives. Worst idea
process since chucky was invented because we know that dolls can not come to life but we
Work Cited
Gowin, Joshua. "Rethinking the Bad Seed." Psychology Today, vol. 42, no. 3, May/Jun2009,
p. 24. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=38710079&site=ehost-live.
Gurel, Perin. A Natural Little Girl: Reproduction and Naturalism in The Bad Seed as
www.academia.edu/246260/A_Natural_Little_Girl_Reproduction_and_Naturalism_in_The_
Bad_Seed_as_Novel_Play_and_Film.
Hamblen, Abigail Ann. "The Bad Seed: A Modern Elsie Venner." Twentieth-Century Literary
Criticism, edited by Jennifer Baise, vol. 96, Gale, 2000. Literature Resource Center,
library.lavc.edu:2077/ps/i.do?p=GLS&sw=w&u=lavc_main&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7
Originally published in Western Humanities Review, vol. 17, no. 4, Autumn 1963, pp. 361-363.
Oates, Joyce Carol. "Killer Kids." Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism, edited by Jennifer
library.lavc.edu:2077/ps/i.do?p=GLS&sw=w&u=lavc_main&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CH
Originally published in The New York Review of Books, vol. 44, no. 17, 6 Nov. 1996, pp. 16-
20.