Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Commented example of
combined precast and in-
situ reinforced concrete
slab design
Educational material
Ing. Josef Fldr
1.12.2012
This document was created under the financial support of FRV 239/2012/G1 project
Navrhovn betonovch a zdnch prvk pi doasnch nvrhovch situacch (Design of
concrete and masonry members in temporary design situations).
1. Assignment
The goal of this commented example is to make the students of Faculty of Civil Engineering,
CTU in Prague familiar with the design procedure of combined precast and in-situ slabs.
Design of load-bearing members is shown also with respect to assembling stages of particular
precast elements of the slab. The aim of the commented example is to show the complexity of
structural design.
Variable
Category C4: Areas for physical activities 5,00 1,5 7,5
Removable partitions, weight < 3,0 kN/m 1,20 1,5 1,8
Total of variable 6,20 9,3
TOTAL 12,92 18,4
~2~
2.2. Calculation of cover depth
Description of the structure
- The structure is inside the building, with low-humidity operations => XC1
- The surface is not exposed to corrosion caused by chlorides
- The surface is not in contact with sea water
- The structure is protected, therefore is not exposed to freeze-thaw cycles
- There is no risk of chemical attack of the structure
- Slab-like structure
~3~
Moment curve
= 0,038
0,038 0,45 lim s f yd
mEd 9,2 10 6
As ,req 171,4 mm 2
f yd . .d 434,7.103.0,98.0,126
s prov 150 mm
smax,1 2.h 2.150 300 mm
smax min smax,1 ; smax, 2 300 mm
smax,2 300 mm
~4~
smin s prov smax
27 mm 150 mm 300mm CHECKED
= 0,045
0,045 0,45 lim s f yd
mEd 11,48 10 6
As ,req 215,2 mm 2
f yd . .d 434,7.10 3.0,982.0,125
Design: 10 per 300 mm (As,prov = 262 mm2)
~5~
Fig. 5 Example of arrangement of upper reinforcement
Check of spacing
s prov 300 mm
smax,1 2.h 2.150 300 mm
smax min smax,1 ; smax, 2 300 mm
smax,2 300 mm
~6~
2.5. SLS check of panel
For the purpose of this example, serviceability limit state will be checked using simplified
method based on deflection control criterion.
Concrete class: C 30/37
Type of structure: continuous beam d,tab = 30,8 pro = 0,5%
2
As,prov = 335 mm (lower reinforcement is crucial for deflections) d,tab = 21,0 pro = 1,5%
2
As,req = 171 mm (required cross-sectional area of reinforcement from ULS)
Span: l = 2,5 m
Reinforcement ratio = As,prov / Ac = 335 / (1000.150) = 0,22 %
As the reinforcement ratio of our panel is less than 0,5 %, d,tab can be taken as 30,8 and no
interpolation is required.
d,tab = 30,8 pro = 0,5%
c1 = 1,0 (rectangular cross-section)
c2 = 1,0 (span is less than 7,0 m)
500 As , prov 500 335
c2 = . . 1,96
f yk As ,req 500 171
d = c1 . c2 . c3 . d,tab = 1,0 . 1,0 . 1,96 . 21,00 = 41,16
l / d = 2,5 / 0,126 = 19,84
l / d < d
19,84 < 41,16 => Checked
~7~
Values of cmin,dur [mm]
Structural Exposure class related to environmental conditions
class X0 XC1 XC2/XC3 XC4 XD1/XS1 XD2/XS2 XD3/XS3
S1 10 10 10 15 20 25 30
S2 10 10 15 20 25 30 35
S3 10 10 20 25 30 35 40
S4 10 15 25 30 35 40 45
S5 15 20 30 35 40 45 50
S6 20 25 35 40 45 50 55
~8~
We choose 22
22
d hc 500 30 459 mm (In final design state, beam collaborates with slab)
2 2
M Ed 184,86
2
2 3
0,175 = 0,245
b.d . f cd 0,25.0,459 .20,0.10
= 0,902
Check of spacing
b 2.c n. 250 2.30 3.22
s prov w 62 mm
n 1 2
smin max (1,2. ; d g 5;20 mm ) max (1,2.22;16 5;20) smin 26,4mm
(dg maximum diameter of aggregate grains)
smin s prov smax
26,4 mm 62 mm CHECKED
~9~
Check of reinforcement in ultimate limit state (ULS)
Design: 322 (As,prov = 1140 mm2)
f ck 30
w,min 0,08. 0,08. 0,00088
f y ,wk 500
Asw 2.50,6
s1,max 460 mm
bw . w,min 250.0,00088
s2,max min 0,75.d ;400 0,75.459 344 mm
smax min 460; 344 344 mm (maximum spacing of stirrups according to detailing rules)
s prov 150 mm 344 mm smax
CHECKED
~ 10 ~
n. Asw . f ywd 4.50,26.500 / 1,15
VRd ,s .z. cot g .459.1,5 171,4 kN
s 150
VEd 134,4 kN 171,4 kN VRd 356,9 kN VRd ,max
CHECKED
reserve 27%
3.4. Connection
In case of full connection between beam and slab, the strain in critical cross-section is
continuous up to the stage when limit elastic state of the cross-section is reached. This
situation can be best characterized as a stage when yield limit of tensile reinforcement is
reached (the strain of reinforcement is sy). Load-bearing capacity of such cross-section is
given by force couple Nc and Nsy with lever arm z.
Fig. 7 Distribution of internal forces in precast and in-situ part of the cross-section.
bi = bw - 2.up = 250 - 2.35 = 180mm (effective width of the beam for transmission of shear stress
between precast and in-situ part of the structure)
~ 11 ~
VEd ,1 1,0 105,9 103
vEd 1,43 MPa
z bi 409 250 2 35
is ratio between longitudinal force in in-situ part of cross-section and total longitudinal
force in compressed part of cross-section, in our case = 1,0, because neutral axis lays
in in-situ part of cross-section (see check of beam),
z is lever arm of internal forces (see check of beam),
bi is width of connection area between in-situ and precast concrete members,
~ 12 ~
4. Temporary design situations
4.1. Design of lifting clutches of the beam
FP V 0,25 0,35 5,5 25 12,03 kN (self-weight of the beam)
Fadh A q 0,35 0,25 0,35 5,5 0,35 0,25 2 1 5,4 kN (increase in self-weight due to
adhesion to formwork)
To minimize the labour consumption in production process, formwork on all sides of the
panel is considered. This is also the worst case for calculation.
go
.Fp Ftah 1,3 12,03 5,4 11,26 kN (force in one lifting clutch during
1,35
N d ,1 .
n. cos 2 cos 30 formwork stripping)
go 1,35
N d ,2 . .Fp 2 12,03 13,13 kN (force in one lifting clutch during
n. cos 2 cos 30 manipulation on construction site)
N d max N d ,1 ; N d , 2 max 11,26;13,13 13,13 kN
During manipulation, the member is subjected to dynamic effects as well. These effects are
taken into account by dynamic coefficient , which increases static effects. The size of
dynamic coefficient is given by lifting device and its rectification.
~ 13 ~
4.2. Number of connecting elements for manipulation
~ 14 ~
z = d - 0,4.x = 309 - 0,4. 124 = 256 mm
M Rd As . f yd .z 1140.106.434.0,256 128,34 kNm
M Rd 128,34 kNm 4,52 kNm M Ed CHECKED
10
d hc 350 30 315 mm (only precast part is effective during transport)
2 2
M Ed 1,48
2
2 3
0,003 = 0,013
b.d . f cd 0,25.0,315 .20,0.10 = 0,995
Check of reinforcement
Design: 210 (As,prov = 157 mm2)
~ 15 ~
go
.Fp Ftah 1,3 3,75 3,25 6,55 kN (force in one lifting clutch during
1,35
N d ,1 .
n. cos 2 cos 30 formwork stripping)
go 1,35
N d ,2 . .Fp 2 3,25 4,09 kN (force in one lifting clutch during manipulation
n. cos 2 cos 30 on construction site)
N d max N d ,1 ; N d , 2 max 6,55;4,09 6,55 kN
Variable
Variable assembling load 0,75 1,5 1,13
Total of variable load 0,75 1,13
TOTAL 4,05 6,19
The calculation is based on an assumption of one temporary support in the middle of span of
filigree panel.
~ 16 ~
Fig. 10 Moment curve with temporary support
2 2
l 2,5
g q d 6,19
1 1
M Ed 1,20 kNm
8 2 8 2
As , prov . f yd 262.434,7
x 7,1 mm
.b. . f cd 0,8.1000.1,0.20,0
x 7,1
0,27 0,617 lim
d 26
z = d 0,5..x = 26 0,5.0,8.7,1 = 23,2 mm
mRd as , prov . f yd .z 262.434,7.10 3.0,023 2,6 kNm
mRd 2,6 kNm 1,20 kNm mEd CHECKED
reserve 116%
One support in the midspan is required. Assumption checked.
~ 17 ~
Design of midspan reinforcement
22
d hc 350 30 309 mm (only precast part is effective during transport)
2 2
Check of reinforcement
Design: 3 22 (As,prov = 1140 mm2) (already designed)
~ 18 ~