TRES CLAVES DEL DISEÑO DE LA VOLADURA PARA

EL RENDIMIENTO ÓPTIMO DEL EXPLOSIVO

OPTIMUM
EXPLOSIVE
PERFORMANCE

Explosive Energy
Level
John Floyd
 ENFOQUE DE GRUPO PARA CONSEGUIR LA
EFICIENCIA DE LA VOLADURA

Evaluación
de Sitio

Refinamiento Diseño de
de Diseño Voladura

Evaluación de Preparación
Rendimiento de Banco

RENDIMIENTO
OPTIMO DE
Excavación
de Voladura
VOLADURAS Marcación
de Malla

Registro de Perforación
Voladura de Barrenos

Control de
Carga de
Calidad del
Barrenos
Explosivo
 TRES CLAVES DEL DISEÑO DE LA VOLADURA PARA
EL RENDIMIENTO ÓPTIMO DEL EXPLOSIVO

Parámetros de Selección por Rendimiento de Detonación

Energía relativa Energía por
Energía por peso por peso volumen
(Potencia (Potencia (Potencia absoluta
Absoluta por Peso Relativa por a granel - ABS) Potencia relativa a
- AWS) (j/g) Peso - RWS) (j/cc) granel (RBS)
Densidad VOD
Energía kj/kg RWS ABS RBS
Sensibilizada (g/cc) m/s
Anfo 0.82 2500-4500 3700 100% 3034 100%
1.2 4600-5500 3224 87% 3869 128%
SAN-G 1.1 3224 100% 3546 117%
0.9 3224 87% 2902 96%
1.2 4600-5600 3371 91% 4045 133%
SAN-G APU 1.1 3371 91% 3708 122%
0.8 3371 91% 2696 89%
OTROS-EMULSIONES 1.1 4500-5200 1989 54% 2188 72%
OTROS-HA 1.1 2696 73% 2966 98%
TRES CLAVES DEL DISEÑO DE LA VOLADURA PARA
EL RENDIMIENTO ÓPTIMO DEL EXPLOSIVO
 Pro Bench

ProBench L v1.23

Blast Dynamics, Inc. Diciembre 2, 2017

Design Comparison
Bench Design Parameters

Operation: Antamina
Location: Yanacancha
Design Name: Original Desmonte Desmonte Modificado
Total Shot per Day (tonnes): 190,000,000 190,000,000
Bench Height (m): 15 15
Blasthole Angle (deg): 0 0
Rock Density (g/cc): 2.70 2.70
 Pro Bench

Explosive Parameters
Main Charge: SAN-G SANG-APU
Density (g/cc): 1.1 1.1
Energy (kjoule): 3224 3371
Charge Diameter (mm): 311.000 311.000
Main Charge Length (m): 9.5 9.5
Main Charge Weight (kg): 793.4 793.4
 Pro Bench

Pattern and Loading Parameters

Blasthole Length (m): 16.5 16.5
Burden (m): 9.0 9.0
Spacing (m): 10.0 10.5
Spacing / Burden Ratio: 1.11 1.17
Subdrill (m): 1.5 1.5
Standoff (m): 0 0
Decking (m): 0.0 0.0
Stem Length (m): 7.0 7.0
Relative Confinement Factor (stem/CD): 22.5 22.5
Units Shot (tonnes/hole): 3,645 3,827
Total Charge Wt. (kg/hole): 793.4 793
Powder Factor (kg/tonne): 0.218 0.207
Energy Factor (kjoule/tonne): 702 699
Difference %: 0%
 Pro Bench

Blast Dynamics, Inc.

Quick Cost Evaluation and Comparison
Antamina Original Desmonte Desmonte Modificado
Drilling
Drilling Cost ($/m): $5.70 $5.70
Drilling Cost ($/tonne): $0.026 $0.025
Total Drilling Cost ($): $4,902,450 $4,669,018
% of Total: 20% 20%
 Pro Bench

Explosives
Bottom Charge ($/kg): $0.0000 $0.0000
Total Bottom Charge Cost ($): $0 $0
Main Charge ($/kg) $0.4500 $0.4500
Total Main Charge Cost ($): $18,611,168 $17,724,990
Primer ($/ea): $2.20 $2.20
Number of Primers: 1 1
Downline ($/ea): $29.00 $29.00
Number of Downlines: 1 1
Surface Delay ($/hole):
Miscellaneous Cost ($/hole):
Initiation and Miscellaneous Cost ($/hole): $31.20 $31.20
Total Initiation Cost ($): $1,626,331 $1,548,893
Total Explosives Cost ($): $20,237,500 $19,273,883
Explosive Cost ($/tonne): $0.1065 $0.1014
% of Total: 80% 80%
 Pro Bench

Overall Costs
Total D and B Cost ($): $25,139,950 $23,942,901
Total D and B Cost ($/tonne): $0.1323 $0.1260
Difference (% and Total D and B $): -5% ($1,197,049)
Excavation and Hauling Cost ($/tonne): $0.900 $0.900
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 0.00%
Projected Excavation Cost ($): $171,000,000 $171,000,000
Processing Cost ($/tonne): $0.000 $0.000
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 0.00%
Projected Processing Cost ($): $0 $0

Ore Value ($/unit): $6,900.00 $6,900.00

Production (units): 400,000 400,000
% Recovery Change:
Estimated Production (units): 400,000 400,000
Estimated Value ($): $2,760,000,000 $2,760,000,000
Difference ($): $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST ($): $196,139,950 $194,942,901
Difference ($): ($1,197,049)
Cost ($/tonne): $1.032 $1.026
Percent Difference: -1%
The max. allowable loss in productivity resulting from the use of Design 2 is 0.0%
Explosive Parameters

Main Charge: OTROS SANG-APU

Density (g/cc): 1.1 1.1
Energy (kjoule): 2696 3371
Charge Diameter (mm): 311.000 311.000
Main Charge Length (m): 9.5 9.5
Main Charge Weight (kg): 793.4 793.4
Overall Costs
Total D and B Cost ($): $25,139,950 $20,569,269
Total D and B Cost ($/tonne): $0.1323 $0.1083
Difference (% and Total D and B $): -18% ($4,570,681)
Excavation and Hauling Cost ($/tonne): $0.900 $0.900
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 0.00%
Projected Excavation Cost ($): $171,000,000 $171,000,000
Processing Cost ($/tonne): $0.000 $0.000
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 0.00%
Projected Processing Cost ($): $0 $0

Ore Value ($/unit): $6,900.00 $6,900.00

Production (units): 400,000 400,000
% Recovery Change:
Estimated Production (units): 400,000 400,000
Estimated Value ($): $2,760,000,000 $2,760,000,000
Difference ($): $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST ($): $196,139,950 $191,569,269
Difference ($): ($4,570,681)
Cost ($/tonne): $1.032 $1.008
Percent Difference: -2%
The max. allowable loss in productivity resulting from the use of Design 2 is 0.2%
Overall Costs
Total D and B Cost ($): $25,139,950 $20,569,269
Total D and B Cost ($/tonne): $0.1323 $0.1083
Difference (% and Total D and B $): -18% ($4,570,681)
Excavation and Hauling Cost ($/tonne): $0.900 $0.900
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 1.00%
Projected Excavation Cost ($): $171,000,000 $169,290,000
Processing Cost ($/tonne): $0.000 $0.000
% Productivity Change: 0.00% 1.00%
Projected Processing Cost ($): $0 $0

Ore Value ($/unit): $6,900.00 $6,900.00

Production (units): 400,000 400,000
% Recovery Change:
Estimated Production (units): 400,000 400,000
Estimated Value ($): $2,760,000,000 $2,760,000,000
Difference ($): $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST ($): $196,139,950 $189,859,269
Difference ($): ($6,280,681)
Cost ($/tonne): $1.032 $0.999
Percent Difference: -3%
The max. allowable loss in productivity resulting from the use of Design 2 is 0.2%
 Mine to Mill
Rendimiento Óptimo Costos generales
de Voladura
DONDE ESTA UBICADO
TU MINA.

Costo de
trituración y
molienda
t/Hr Kwh/t

Costo de
excavación t/hr
Costo de
perforación y
voladura
$/t
Aumento del Costo

Aumento de la fragmentación
 $/tn
Minada
MUCHAS GRACIAS
TRES CLAVES DEL DISEÑO DE LA VOLADURA PARA
EL RENDIMIENTO ÓPTIMO DEL EXPLOSIVO

(NO,
NO2)
(CO)
Factores generación
de humos tóxicos:
Cebo inadecuado,
96% AN y 4% 92% AN y 8% FO falta de
FO producirá produce un 6% confinamiento, agua,
un 12% menos energía composición
menos deficiente del
energía explosivo, mala
configuración de los
(CO2, H2O)
tiempos, técnicas
inadecuadas de carga
y mala reacción con
la roca.