Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The results from this study may be used to im- describes 10 tasks broken down into smaller steps, and
prove skin cancer education in medical schools. Improved each step is marked as either “performed” or “failed to
communication between educators, both directly and perform”(Table). The global rating scale is a subjective
through literature, would allow for schools to learn from evaluation of the overall ability of trainees. It uses a
the strengths and weaknesses of other curriculums. Each sliding scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 5 (outstanding) to
school will need to face barriers including limited re- grade knowledge of technical details, handling of instru-
sources, time constraints, and lack of importance placed ments and “tissue,” and smoothness or awkwardness of
on dermatology education. movements (global rating scale available as an online
Medical school education needs revision to ensure that eTable [http://www.archdermatol.com]). Feedback is pro-
medical students receive adequate training and gradu- vided immediately, and residents work on areas that
ate with specific competencies for skin cancer preven- need improvement before they attempt surgery in live
tion and detection. Future studies should seek to de- patients.
velop and incorporate improved skin cancer instruction This model is more convenient than pigs’ feet, which
into the medical school curriculum and evaluate its ef- are commonly used, and more readily available and less
fectiveness. expensive than human cadavers, live animals, or virtual re-
ality models. Admittedly, the skin pad does not resemble
Heather A. Brandling-Bennett, MD real human skin (it has “low fidelity”), but this should not
Laura A. Capaldi, MD negate its educational value. Anastakis et al1 demon-
Barbara A. Gilchrest, MD strated that training on low-fidelity models was equiva-
Alan C. Geller, MPH, RN lent to training on cadavers. Also, Matsumoto et al2 showed
Correspondence: Mr Geller, Department of Dermatol- that training with a video-endoscopic–based system was
ogy, Boston University School of Medicine, 720 Harrison equivalent to the use of an expanded polystyrene cup and
Ave, Doctor’s Office Building Room 801A, Boston, MA Penrose drain models for urologic procedures.
02118 (ageller@bu.edu). In its present form, the model cannot be used as an
Financial Disclosure: None. assessment tool because it lacks validity, is not com-
Funding/Support: This project was funded by a grant from prehensive (does not evaluate consent, patient interac-
the American Skin Association, New York, NY. tion, or hemostasis), and does not discriminate
between various levels of skill. Nevertheless, future
1. Howe HL, Wingo PA, Thun MJ, et al. Annual reports to the nation on the research could focus on developing such an instru-
status of cancer (1973 though 1998), featuring cancers with recent increas- ment using our checklist and global rating scale to
ing trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:824-842.
2. Koh HK, Norton LA, Geller AC, et al. Evaluation of the American Academy assess performance of trainees on inanimate models or
of Dermatology’s National Skin Cancer Early Detection and Screening Program. even live patients. Also, it will be important to docu-
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:971-978.
3. Dolan NC, Martin GJ, Robinson JK, Rademaker AW. Skin cancer control prac-
ment the transfer of knowledge or skill from the inani-
tices among physicians in a university general medicine practice. J Gen Intern mate model training to the actual operative perfor-
Med. 1995;10:515-519. mance and to compare the effectiveness of inanimate
4. Moore M, Geller AC, Zhang Z, et al. Skin cancer examination teaching in US
medical education. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:439-6. models to virtual reality simulators.3
5. FACTS—applicants, matriculants and graduates. Association of American Medi-
cal Colleges Web site. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/2003 Carlos Garcia, MD
/2003school.htm. Accessed July 19, 2004.
Marcy Neuburg, MD
Kim Carlson-Sweet, MD
T his model, which is used in our programs to teach NE 13th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 (carlos-garcia
elliptical excision and basic suturing tech- @ouhsc.edu).
niques to dermatology residents, consists of face Financial Disclosure: None.
diagrams, a skin substitute pad, a checklist, and a global Previous Presentation: This study was presented at the
rating scale. The face diagrams are premarked with three annual meeting of the Association of Academic Derma-
1-cm circles representing lesions on the forehead, cheek, tologic Surgeons; September 11, 2004; Chicago, Ill.
and nasolabial fold . The skin substitute pad (Limbs and Additional Resources: The online-only eTable is avail-
Things, Bristol, England) is a 3-layered model made of able at http://www.archdermatol.com.
foam and vinyl. Acknowledgment: This project was completed under the
Initially, residents undergo a 1- to 2-hour training ses- guidance and advice of Chris Candler, MD.
sion to learn the design and execution of elliptical exci-
sion, undermining, and various suturing techniques, in- 1. Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. Assessment of technical skills trans-
fer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg. 1999;
cluding cutaneous simple interrupted and running, 177:167-170.
vertical mattress, and subcutaneous buried. Two weeks 2. Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench
later, they perform the tasks again while the attending model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol.
2002;167:1243-1247.
dermatologic surgeon grades their performance using 3. Haluck RS, Krummel TM. Computers and virtual reality for surgical educa-
a checklist and a global rating scale. The checklist tion in the 21st century. Arch Surg. 2000;135:786-792.