PDD Siteki Public 15 10

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM – Executive Board Page 1
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM

FOR SMALL-SCALE CDM PROJECT ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-SSC-PDD)
Version 04.1
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD)
Title of the project activity Siteki, Plumbungan, Ketenger #4 and Cileunca

Small-Scale Hydroelectric Power Projects
Version number of the PDD version 3.7
Completion date of the PDD 07/10/2013
Project participant(s) P.T. Indonesia Power
Centre for Application and Assessment of
Energy Resources Technology, Agency for the
Application and Assessment of Technology
(BPPT)
The Chugoku Electric Power Co.,Inc
Host Party(ies) Indonesia
Sectoral scope(s) and selected methodology(ies) Sectoral Scope 1 : Energy industries
(renewable/non-renewable sources)
Methodology : AMS.I.D-Grid connected

renewable electricity generation (Version 17)
Estimated amount of annual average GHG
21,041 (t-CO2 e)
emission reductions
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
SECTION A. Description of project activity

A.1. Purpose and general description of project activity
>>
The purpose of the project activity is to generate electricity and export it to the JAMALI grid by using
a renewable hydro energy sources to meet the demand for energy in the Java, Madura and Bali islands
so that it will reduce GHG emissions produced in the JAMALI grid generation mix and support
sustainable development related to energy generation.
The project activity is a bundle of four small-scale CDM project activities of the same type power
generation, exporting electricity to the Jawa Madura Bali grid (hereinafter referred to as the “JAMALI
grid”). Each project activity within the bundle developed and operated by PT Indonesia Power
(hereinafter referred to as “IP”) is a run-of-river small-scale hydroelectric power generation project,
which is further called a Small-Scale Hydro Power Plant (hereinafter referred to as “SSHPP”). The
project activity is the first small-scale CDM project of IP in Indonesia.
Ketenger #4 SSHPP is an expansion of existing Ketenger Hydro Power Plant which supplies
electricity to JAMALI grid through transmission line of 30 kV. After the construction of Ketenger #4
SSHPP was completed, it was found that several improvements in the system have to be done in order
to be in accordance with UNFCCC methodology. It was found that the measurement of kWh net
generated by Ketenger #4 SSHPP requires a modification of the existing 30kV transformer overall,
and also new transformer, special for Ketenger #4 SSHPP is required to be installed. The
inconsistency condition happened, because the local engineers are not familiar with UNFCCC
methodology, and the supervision needed during the development was not conducted well. Finally,
due to the internal reason, IP decided to abort the measurement of the net electricity of Ketenger #4.
The additionality of the project activity is analyzed separately. Therefore, there is no impact in the
investment analysis result of the other SSHPPs, although without Ketenger #4.
The sum of the installed capacity of the small-scale CDM project activities within the bundle is 3.8
MW and the net annual energy exported to the grid owned by PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara
(Persero) (herein after referred to as “PLN”), a state owned power utility company, is 24,269 MWh.
The bundle consists of Siteki SSHPP, Plumbungan SSHPP, Cileunca SSHPP with an installed
capacity of 1.2 MW, 1.6 MW and 1.0 MW respectively.
The project activity will contribute to climate change mitigation efforts through the reduction of
Green House Gas (hereinafter referred to as “GHG”) emissions from electrical energy generation. The
estimated annual GHG emission reductions will be 21,041 tCO2.
View of project participants on the contribution of the project activity to sustainable development:
In addition to the generation of electric power, the project activity also contributes to the following:
Environment:
The project activity will utilize unused hydro potential for power generation. In the absence of the
project, the grid will otherwise be dominated by power generations using fossil fuels such as coal
and diesel oil. The project activity, which is a zero emission electricity generation, will eliminate
GHG emissions produced from fossil-based power generation. Apart from this, the project activity
will cause no negative impact on the environment locally as well as globally.
Social:
The project activity will also assist in creating employment in the project area, for either skilled or
unskilled laborers during the construction and operation of the project.
Economy:
The development of the Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs in the Banjarcahyana irrigation canal will
improve the condition of the canal, resulting in the upgraded supply of water to local farm land
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
surrounding the SSHPPs. The project activity as in Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPPs will
upgrade road quality, particularly road access to the SSHPPs to be developed. This in turn will
contribute to improvement of the local economy.
Technology:
The project activity will contribute to technology and capacity development, since part of the
equipment and technical maintenance will be provided by the host country. Such a project can
further stimulate initiatives for innovation in the energy sector of the host country.
A.2. Location of project activity

A.2.1. Host Party(ies)
>>The Republic of Indonesia a.
A.2.2. Region/State/Province etc.

>> a. Siteki SSHPP and Plumbungan SSHPP are located in Central Java Province.
b. Cileunca SSHPP is located in West Java Province.
A.2.3. City/Town/Community etc.

>>
a. Siteki SSHPP is located in Lengkong Village, Rakit District, Banjarnegara Regency.
b. Plumbungan SSHPP is located in Tanjunganom Village, Rakit District,
Banjarnegara Regency.
c. Cileunca SSHPP is located in Wanasari and Pulosari Villages, Pangalengan District,
Bandung Regency.
A.2.4. Physical/ Geographical location

>>
a. Siteki SSHPP is located in the existing Banjarcahyana irrigation canal about 5 km
downstream from the Soedirman dam tailrace. It is located in Lengkong village, Rakit
district, Banjarnegara regency, Central Java province. The Siteki SSHPP location is on
07°24’19.1” south latitude and 109º34’03.4” east longitude. The map of the location is
presented in Figure 1.
b. The Plumbungan SSHPP is located about 1 km downstream from the Siteki SSHPP. The
power plant is located in Tanjunganom village, Rakit district, Banjarnegara regency,
Central Java. The plant is situated at the coordinate 07º24'42.8'' south latitude and
109º34'03.6'' east longitude. The physical location of site is given in Figure 1.
c. The Ketenger #4 SSHPP is located in the area of the existing Ketenger Hydro Power
Plant owned by IP. It will be built 50 m downstream from the existing Ketenger #1, #2,
and #3 SSHPP. The site location is administratively situated in the Ketenger Village,
Baturaden district, Banyumas regency, Central Java province. Geographically, the
project is positioned at south latitude 07º20’02.6” and west longitude 109º13’11.2”. The
map of the location is presented in Figure 1.
d. The Cileunca SSHPP is located at about 1.km on the tailrace downstream from the
existing Palayangan Dam (Cileunca Lake). The Cileunca SSHPP is situated in
Warnasari and Pulosari villages, Pangalengan district, Bandung regency, West Java
province. The coordinate is 7º33' south latitude and 107º55' east longitude. The site
location is given in Figure 1.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Figure 1 : Map illustrating the locations of the project activity
A.3. Technologies and/or measures

>>
The project activity applies a run-of-river small-scale hydroelectric power generation technology,
which converts mechanical energy available in the water flow into electrical energy using hydro
turbines and alternators. This is a common technology for small-scale hydroelectric power generation
and has widely been used throughout the world in many hydroelectric power plants for years.
An S-type turbine will be selected for the Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs in order to obtain higher
energy efficiency due to the low head of these SSHPP (below 20 m). The Cileunca SSHPP, which has
a high head of 40 m, will use a Francis type turbine. The development of SSHPP technology in
Indonesia is very slow as demonstrated by the small number of hydro power plants built so far. This
has led to inefficient production in the manufacture of turbines. An imported S-type turbine from
China is expected to trigger manufacturing of this type of turbine. There is a plan to manufacture
Francis type turbines by applying local technology.
Project description:
Siteki SSHPP:
The Siteki SSHPP mainly consists of an intake, headrace, a head tank, a penstock, a powerhouse and
an outlet.
Plumbungan SSHPP:
The Plumbungan SSHPP has a sand basin, a head tank, a penstock, a powerhouse and a tailrace.
Cileunca SSHPP:
The Cileunca SSHPP mainly consists of a penstock (immersed under water and immersed in the
ground outside the dam), a powerhouse and a tailrace.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table 1 : The nominal data of each SSHPP

unit Siteki Plumbungan Cileunca
Total installed capacity MW 1.2 1.6 1.0
Average net annual export
MWh 6,967 10,894 6,408
of electricity
Effective Head m 16.65 19.93 40.0
3
Flow rate m /s 9.5 9.64 3.25
Number of units - 1 1 2
Lifetime Years 30 30 30
Load Factor % 68 83 73
Horizontal
Type of turbine - S-type S-type
Francis
In the previous explanation, prevailing practice was used to explain additionality of this project
activity. The technical data of Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs used in that explanation were adopted
from the letter of IP that sent to PLN regarding an offer of selling electricity price. A technical data
nor an economic data were not used to be analysed and to be evaluated in the prevailing practice
explanation. Finally, the investment analysis is used to explain the additionality of the project activity,
the technical data and the economic data needed in the explanation were adopted from FSR
(Feasibility Study Report) of SSHPPs. Therefore, there is a difference of kWh value in the previous
explanation and the final explanation. The large of kWh difference for Siteki and Plumbungan is
12.0% and -4.5, respectively.
A.4. Parties and project participants
Party involved Private and/or public entity(ies) project Indicate if the Party involved
(host) indicates a participants wishes to be considered as
host Party (as applicable) project participant (Yes/No)
Indonesia (Host) P.T. Indonesia Power No

Indonesia (Host) Centre for Application and Assessment of No
Energy Resources Technology, Agency
for the Application and Assessment of
Technology (BPPT)
Japan The Chugoku Electric Power Co.,Inc. No
The contact information for project participants in the project activity is provided in Appendix 1 in
this PDD.
A.5. Public funding of project activity

>>
There is no public funding involved for the financing of the project activity. As such it will not result
in a diversion of official development assistance.
A.6. Debundling for project activity

>>
Three small-scale hydroelectric power generation project activities are bundled as a single CDM
project activity. The project proponent confirms that the proposed project activity is not a debundled
component of a large-scale project. The project proponent further confirms that there are no other
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
small-scale CDM projects to be registered within 1km of the project boundary of the proposed
activities.
SECTION B. Application of selected approved baseline and monitoring methodology

B.1. Reference of methodology
>> Type: TYPE I - RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
The project activity uses the following approved baseline and monitoring methodology and available
at the UNFCCC website:
Title Reference Version

Grid Connected Renewable Electricity Generation: AMS-I.D., EB 61, Version 17
Annex 17, 3 June 2011
Tool to calculate the Emission factor for an electricity EB 61, Annex 12, 3 Version 2.2.0
System June 2011
B.2. Project activity eligibility

>>
The project activity is a bundle of three small-scale CDM project activities (bundled project activities)
for a renewable energy generation project with a total installed capacity of 3.8 MW to be exported to
the JAMALI grid. As the total capacity of the proposed project activity does not exceed the eligibility
limit of 15 MW, the project activity is qualified as a small-scale CDM project activity to which
simplified modalities and procedures indicated by UNFCCC indicative can be applied. Considering
that the project activity involves energy generation from hydro potential and exports the power to a
grid, based on small-scale CDM modalities, the project activity falls under Type I, Renewable Energy
Project and Category I.D. Grid connected renewable electricity generation (Version 17, EB 61, Annex
17, 3 June 2011).
The power density of Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca is greater than 4 W/m2. According to the
document AMS-I.D Version 17, EB 61, Annex 17, 3 June 2011, Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPP
results in new reservoir and the power density of the power plant as per definition given in the Project
Emission, it is eligible this method. Cileunca SSHPP use water flow discharged from the existing
reservoir of Cileunca Lake, without any change in surface area, after and before the project activity
implemented. Moreover, the project is not a debundled component of a large-scale project as shown
in paragraph A.4.5. Hence, the type and category of the project activity matches with the Type I.D. as
specified in Appendix B.
B.3. Project boundary

>>
The project boundary specified in Type I.D. in Appendix B encompasses the physical, geographical
site of the renewable generation source. For the project activity under consideration, the project
boundary considered encompasses SSHPP’s facilities such as a diversion structure, penstock,
powerhouse, and tailrace canal.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Auxiliary Auxiliary Auxiliary

Consumption Consumption Consumption
Siteki Plumbungan Cileunca

SSHPP SSHPP SSHPP
Electricity to JAMALI grid
Project Boundary
Electricity to end-user
Electricity Stream
Figure 2 : Project Boundary
Table 2 : Emission sources and gases included in the project boundary for
the he project activity lies within the domain of calculating project
emissions and baseline emissions
Source Gas Included Justification/Explanation

Baseline JAMALI Grid electricity CO2 Included According to AMS I.D. only
production CO2 emissions from electricity
generation should be accounted
for
CH4 Excluded According to AMS I.D.
N2O Excluded According to AMS I.D.
Project Siteki, Plumbungan and CO2 Excluded According to AMS I.D.
Activity Cileunca SSHPPs CH4 Excluded According to AMS I.D.
N2O Excluded According to AMS I.D.
B.4. Establishment and description of baseline scenario

>>
The project activity involves an installation of a new grid-connected renewable power plant/unit.
Therefore, the baseline scenario is the electricity delivered to the JAMALI grid by the project activity
that otherwise would have been generated by the operation of grid-connected power plants and by the
addition of new generation sources.
According to AMS-ID (Version 17, EB 61, Annex 17, 3 June 2011, the baseline emissions are the
product of electrical energy baseline EGPJ,y expressed in MWh of electricity produced by the
renewable generating unit multiplied by the grid emission factor factors EFCO2,grid,y according to the
“Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” (Version 02.2.0, EB 61, Annex 12, 3
June 2011).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The Emission Factor can be calculated in a transparent and conservative manner as follows:
(a) A combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and
build margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the ‘Tool to calculate the
Emission Factor for an electricity system” (Version 02.2.0, EB 61, Annex 12, 3 June
2011)
OR
(b) The weighted average emissions (in t CO2/MWh) of the current generation mix. The data
of the year in which project generation occurs must be used.
Option (a) is selected for the baseline emission calculation. Calculations shall be based on data from
an official source (where available) and made publicly available, as given in section B.6.
Parameters
The “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” Version 02.2.0, EB 61, Annex 12,
3 June 2011 provides procedures to determine parameters considered in the baseline calculation as
presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Parameters considered for the baseline calculation
Parameter SI Unit Description

EFgrid,CM,y tCO2/MWh Combined margin CO2 emission factor for project
electricity system in year y
EFgrid,BM,y tCO2/MWh Build margin CO2 emission factor for project
EFgrid,OM,y tCO2/MWh Operating margin CO2 emission factor for project
The baseline does not considered leakage since the project activity is a new hydro power project,
according to the methodology AMS I.D, in which there is no equipment transferred from another
activity. Therefore, leakage is not considered.
B.5. Demonstration of additionality

>>
UNFCCC’s simplified modalities seek the establishment of the additionality of the small-scale project
activity as described in Attachment A to Appendix B, which lists various barriers, out of which at
least one barrier due to which the project would not have occurred shall be identified. Evidence as to
why the proposed project is additional is offered under the following categories of barrier due to the
investment.
Investment Analysis
The project’s additionality is confirmed by applying the investment analysis to show that there is
Investment Analysis for the project activity. The project activity is not financially attractive without
CER revenues.
This part of this section will determined whether the Project is economically attractive or not through
an appropriate analysis method, a benchmark analysis. Project Internal Rate of Return (hereinafter
referred as to “project IRR”) has been used as the financial indicator in the investment analysis. The
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
development of the project activity will be concluded by comparing the project IRR without CER
revenues with the benchmark which is the minimum discount rate of Bank Indonesia between
February 2003 and September 20051. This time was selected because the FSR Siteki, Plumbungan and
Cileunca were completed during this time.
Previously, the benchmark was a discount rate on Bank of Indonesia Certificates of 12.74% 2. This
value was selected based on the time decision of board of commissariat of IP that the project activity
would be developed as a CDM project in February 2006. However, the benchmark was not right,
because the benchmark should be determined on the time when the economical consideration
established. In this project activity, the considerations were built during February 2003 and September
2005, and then the benchmark should be determined during that time.
Estimation cost considered in the revised FSR done on October 2005 is used in the investment
analysis for each SSHPP. The estimation cost is higher than the estimation cost considered in the
previous FS because there are an additional cost for repairing irrigation channel broken by villager
who utilized water from the channel illegally and adjustment cost for the economic condition in that
time.
The adjustment cost considered inflation rates since 2003 to 2005, and the sharp increase of material
building price during the three years. Inflation rate of Republic of Indonesia in 2003, 2004 & 2005
was 5.06%, 6.40% and 17.11%3, respectively. Total of the inflation rate during three year is 28.56%.
In 2004, rate of increase of steel price was up sharply, reached to 100%4,5.
Table 4 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Siteki SSHPP
Parameter Value Source
Total installed capacity 1.2 MW rev FSR page 8

Average annual export to the grid rev FSR page 8
6,967 MWh
(average annual net electricity generated)
Project lifetime 30 years rev FSR page 8
PLF (Plant Load Factor) 68.00% FSR page 8-2
Foreign exchange rate Rp 9,260/US$ Yahoo Finance
Unit price of electricity sales Rp 455/kWh rev FSR page 8
Crediting period 7 years Project Proponent estimation
US$ 7/t-CO2 (for the first 7 years)
Expected CER price US$ 20/t-CO2 (after 7 years)
Project Proponent estimation
Expenses
Total Investment cost Rp 24.94 Billion rev FSR page 8
http://digilib.petra.ac.id/viewer.php?page=1&submit.x=0&submit.y=0&qual=high&fname=/jiunkpe/s1/eman/2006/jiunkpe-ns-s1-2006-
31402151-6016-makro-references.pdf
2
Economic Report on Indonesia 2007, Bank Indonesia ,table 29, page 243
3
Table 16, page 303 of 2005 Economic Report on Indonesia,
http://www.bi.go.id/web/en/Publikasi/Laporan+Tahunan/Laporan+Perekonomian+Indonesia/lpi2005.htm
4
http://www.tempo.co.id/hg/ekbis/2004/03/11/brk,20040311-39,id.html
5
Table 2 Steel price series 2001-2007, Steel: Price and Policy Issues,
http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1492&context=key_workplace
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Annual Operating expenses

General and administration cost Rp 0.941 Billion rev FSR Appendix 1
Maintenance cost Rp 0.299 Billion rev FSR Appendix 1
Insurance Rp 0.087 Billion rev FSR Appendix 1
Community Development Rp 0.158 Billion rev FSR Appendix 2
Water usage tax Rp 0.035 Billion rev FSR Appendix 1
Note : Feasibility Study Report (herein after referred as to “FSR”) of the project activity
Operating & maintenance cost (hereinafter referred to as ”O&M” cost)
General and Administration cost (hereinafter referred to as “G&A” cost)
Table 5 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Plumbungan SSHPP
Total installed capacity 1.6 MW rev FSR page10

Average annual export to grid rev FSR page10
10,894 MWh
Project lifetime 30 years rev FSR page10
PLF (Plant Load Factor) 83.00% Calculation in FSR

Unit price of electricity sales Rp 455/kWh rev FSR page10
Expected CER price US$ 20/t-CO2 (after 7 years)
Project Proponent estimation
Expenses
Total Investment cost Rp 43,04 Billion rev FSR page10

Table 6 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Cileunca SSHPP
Total installed capacity 2 x 0.5 MW rev FSR 11

Average annual export to grid
6.408 MWh rev FSR 11
Project lifetime 30 years rev FSR 12
PLF (Plant Load Factor) 73.00% FSR page 31
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Unit price of electricity sales Rp 575/kWh rev FSR 12
Expected CER price Project Proponent estimation
US$ 20/t-CO2 (after 7 years)
Expenses
Total Investment cost Rp 33.00 Billion rev FSR 12

Project Internal Rate of Return (Project IRR) :

The calculation of the project IRR is based on the period of assessment of 30 years which reflects the
project lifetime. The summary of the financial analysis of the project activity without and with the
inclusion of CER revenue of a CDM project is shown in Table 7. At a total investment cost of each
SSHPP, the project IRR of each SSHP without CDM revenue is lower than the benchmark. This
shows that the project activity does not represent an attractive investment opportunity in the absence
of additional revenue to that received through electricity sales. When the CER revenue is taken into
account, the projects IRRs overpass the benchmark, confirming feasible project.
Table 7 Summary of the investment analysis, project IRR with and without CDM revenue
Project IRR Benchmark Project IRR

Items
without CER income (%) (%) with CER income (%)
Siteki 4.86 7.32 7.95
Plumbungan 5.99 7.32 8.70
Cileunca 3.42 7.32 6.92
In spite of the project IRR is below the benchmark value after the plus CER revenues, the project will
still be developed by the IP.
A sensitive analysis
A sensitivity analysis was conducted by varying 4 parameters which could alter the project IRR to
indicate project’s viability. Variations of ± 10% of electricity selling price, plant's load factor
(hereinafter referred to as ”PLF”), G&A and “O&M” cost have been considered in the sensitivity
analysis to assess the project IRR.
Table 8 :Condition at which benchmark value is reached

IRR will reach Benchmark if
SSHPP SSHPP SSHPP
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The initial investment is reduced by 24.43% 13.51% 35.30%

The electricity price is increased by 16.75% 10.26% 26.36%
The O&M cost is reduced by n.r n.r n.r
The PLF is increased by 16.75% 10.26% 26.36%
The G&A expenses is reduced by 56.45% 53.90% n.r
Note:
- n.r : not reached
- At zero O&M cost the project IRR of Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPPs is 6.28%, 6.80% and 5.38%,
respectively (below the benchmark value 7.32%).
- At zero G&A cost the project IRR of Cileunca SSHPP is 7.31% (below the benchmark value 7.32%).
The project IRR of Siteki and Plumbungan would reach the benchmark value if the initial investment
reduced by 24.43% and 13.51%, however based on the real expenses during construction time for
both SSHPP, the reduction cost is unlikely achieved. Total investment cost for Electricity and
Mechanical equipment for Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPP is Rp. 23.6 billion, and for civil
construction cost for both SSHPP is Rp. 39.9 billion. With regard to Cileunca SSHPP which has not
even started the construction yet, the project IRR would reach the benchmark value if the initial
investment cost is reduced by 35.30%. Based on the domestic inflation during 2006-2008 6 , the
reduction of the initial investment is hardly achieved.
The project IRR of Siteki SSHPP & Plumbungan SSHPP would reach the benchmark value if the
electricity selling price is increased by 16.75% and 10.26% respectively. The selling price is unlikely
to increase because the price of both SSHPPs has been fixed in the PPA entered into with PLN. With
regard to Cileunca SSHPP, the project IRR would reach the benchmark value if the electricity selling
price is increased by 26.36%. The electricity selling price estimation in the calculation of the project
IRR (Cileunca SSHPP) was based on the last negotiation result between PLN and IP in June 2005.
The trend of PLF is same with the trend of electricity selling price, that the PLF of Siteki,
Plumbungan, and Cileunca SSHPP would reach the benchmark if the PLF value increased by 16.75%,
10.26% and 26.36%, respectively. Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPP are constructed on irrigation
channel having a stable flow rate used to irrigate rice fields. The expected operating hours of Siteki
and Plumbungan SSHPP were determined by historical hydrological data from 1998-2002 (5 years)7
and 1996-2003 (8 years)8, respectively. The PLF is unlikely to increase because the flow rate capacity
of the irrigation cannot be increased. Use of water for irrigation is a priority compared to generate
electricity in irrigation channels9.
Cileunca SSHPP utilizes discharged water from Cileunca Lake, based on the hydrological data taken
for 6 years (1997-2002), the power generation capacity was determined 10 . The PLF is unlikely
increase anymore because the debit water from Cileunca Dam tends to decreases recently11.
In order to surpass the benchmark value, the G&A cost of Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs need to be
reduced to about 56.45% and 53.90%, respectively. According to the upward trend of inflation rate
6
2008 Economic Report on Indonesia, table 30, page 198
7 Studi Kelayakan dan Penyusunan Basic Design Proyek PLTA Siteki Banjarnegara-Jawa Tengah, Laporan Akhir, Lembaga
Pengambdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universtias Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
8 Studi Kelayakan dan Pembuatan Dokumen Lelang Proyek PLTM Plumbungan, Banjarnegara-Jawa Tengah, Laporan
Utama, PT Wiratman & Associates, page 4-12& 4-13
9http://air.bappenas.go.id/main/doc/pdf/prakarsa_sda_jawa/ABSTRAKSI%20PRAKARSA%20SDA%20JAWA%20FINAL.pdf
10 Studi Kelayakan PLTM CIleunca 2x500kW, kecamatan Pengalengan, kabupaten Bandung, Buku 1 Laporan Utama, LAPI-
ITB
11 http://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/node/162505
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
from 2006 until 20083 the reduction in the administration cost is not plausible. The G&A cost of
Cileunca SSHPP will never reach the benchmark even the G&A cost is reduced to zero, which is
unrealistic.
With regard to the annual O&M cost, the project IRR of all SSHPPs will never reach the benchmark
value even the O&M cost is reduced to zero.
Based on the sensitivity analysis to the parameters considered above, it is clear that the likely change
of the parameters to reach the benchmark could be ignored because this will not affect the project
IRR.
The paragraphs above demonstrate that emission reductions would not occur in the absence of
revenue from CER of the CDM as a result of the low IRR (without CER revenue). This confirms that
CDM revenue is a necessary for the project activity to overcome the investment barrier.
Table 9 :Sensitivity analysis of Project IRR
Site Parameters -10% Base Case +10%
Electricity selling price 3.19% 4.86% 6.36%

Siteki
General and administration cost 5.32% 4.86% 5.17%
Initial Investment 6.56% 4.86% 4.38%
PLF 3.19% 4.86% 6.36%

O&M cost 5.00% 4.86% 4.71%
Plumbungan

PLF 4.60% 5.99% 7.29%
O&M cost 6.07% 5.99% 5.91%
Cileunca

PLF 1.62% 3.42% 4.97%
O&M cost 3.62% 3.42% 3,21%
Bench mark 7.32%
It is shown in table 10 that the project participant had made a formal decision for developing the
project activity as a CDM project activity. This indicates that the project owner had been aware about
the benefit of the CDM scheme to support its activities. Therefore, it is clear that the project owner
has fully considered the revenues from CDM when decided to implement the project activity. This is
illustrated in the following chronological time of events:
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The following table presents summarize the chronology of events in the development of the project
activity.
Table 10 Milestones of the project activity

Nov 2002 IP had a meeting with Chugoku EPCO regarding their
intention on CDM project to Chugoku EPCO.
April 21, 2001 : IP and Chugoku EPCO agreed to implement CDM projects
for three SSHPPS project.
Feb 22, 2003 : FSR Siteki SSHPP conducted by Gadjah Mada University,
Mar, 2003 was completed
FSR Plumbungan SSHPP conducted by PT Wiratman &
associates was completed
The result of FSRs states that the proposed projects is
financially not attractive. The project developer should apply
CDM to ensure a successful implementation of the projects.
January 2005 IP appointed Chugoku EPCO as CER buyer, and IP started
to discuss with Chugoku EPCO, regarding Siteki and
Plumbungan were developed as CDM projects
Jun 15, 2005 FSR Cileunca SSHPP conducted by LAPI ITB was
completed
The result of FSR mentioned CDM revenue is required to
increase the feasibility of the projects.
Oct, 2005 IP revised the financial analysis for Siteki, Plumbungan and
Cileunca SSHPPs, the result is same than before, that CDM
revenue is required to increase the feasibility of the projects.
The revised FSR was conducted by PT Fajar Futura Indah.
Nov, 2005 The Board Directore of IP agreed to develop the Siteki,
Plumbungan SSHPPs project as a CDM project, and
appointed Chugoku EPCO as a CER buyer.
Feb. 13, 2006 : The Board of Commissariat of IP made a decision that
Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPPs would be
developed as a CDM project activity.
Sept. 20, 2006 : ERPA signed
Sept. 25, 2006 : the purchasing contract for equipment for Siteki and
Plumbungan SSHPPs was conducted
Nov.15, 2005 : Stakeholder consultation meeting for Siteki &Plumbungan
Sept. 28, 2006 SSHPPS and Cileunca SSHPP were conducted.
April 2007 : Start validation process
March 8, 2007 : A LoA was issued by DNA Japan.
June 11, 2007 : A LoA was issued by DNA Indonesia
Power Purchase Agreement of Siteki and Plumbungan
Dec., 2008 :
SSHPPs was signed
Each FSR was conducted by consultant who selected by open bidding done by IP. Revised FSR have
to be carried out because of the need for additional cost for repair and strengthening of irrigation
channel.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The paragraphs above demonstrate that emission reductions would not occur in the absence of
revenue from CER of the CDM as a result of the low IRR (without CER revenue). This confirms that
CDM revenue is a necessary for the SSHPPs to overcome the investment barrier.
B.6. Emission reductions

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices
>>
In order to quantify emissions reductions achieved by the project activity, procedures to calculate
project emissions, baseline emissions, leakage and emissions reductions set put in methodology are
applied as follows.
1. Calculation of EFgrid CM, y of JAMALI grid

The baseline emissions are calculated as the product of the kWh produced by renewable generation
times an emission coefficient (baseline emission factor) calculated as a combine margin (CM),
consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) according to the
procedures prescribed in the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”, Version
02.2.0, EB 61, Annex 12, 3 June 2011 in the following steps:
STEP 1: Identify the relevant electric power system.

STEP 2: Choose whether to include off-grid power plants in the project electricity system (optional)
STEP 3: Select a method to determine the operating margin (OM)
STEP 4: Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method.
STEP 5: Calculate the build margin emission factor.
STEP 6: Calculate the combined margin (CM) emission factor.
Step 1. Identify the relevant electricity systems

The Single Line Diagram of JAMALI 12 indicates that the electricity generated from the project
activity is connected to the JAMALI grid. The grid has transmission lines connected to the power
generations located in Central Java Province and West Java Province. The grid is not connected to
other grid systems so that there is no import and export of electricity from or to the grid.
Step 2. Choose whether to include off-grid power plants in the project electricity system (optional)
There are two options prescribed in “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”
(Version 02.2.0, EB 61, Annex 12, 3 June 2011) as below,
Option I : Only grid power plants are include in the calculation

Option II: Both grid power plant and off grid power plant are included in the calculation
The power plants (Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPPs) will be connected to the JAMALI grid
and the generated electricity will be supplied to the grid. This project activity selected Option I to
calculate the operating margin and building margin emission factor.
Step 3. Select a method to determine the operating margin (OM)

According to the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” Version 02.2.0, EB
61, Annex 12, 3 June 2011, the calculation of the operating margin emission factor EFgrid, OM,,y can be
based on one of the four available methods:
(a) Simple OM,
12Keputusan Menteri Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral Nomor: 55 K/30/MEM/2003, tentang Jaringan Transmisi Nasional
(JTN)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
(b) Simple adjusted OM, or

(c) Dispatch Data Analysis OM, or
(d) Average OM
Simple OM is selected from the methods because low-cost/must run13 resources are less than 50% of
total grid generation in: 1) average of the five most recent years, or 2) based on long-term average
hydroelectric production. The proportion of low-cost/must-run resources in the JAMALI grid from
2002 to 2006 is less than 50% of the total grid generation (The low-cost/must-run resources in the
JAMALI Grid were respectively 15.3% in 2002, 13.0% in 2003, 13.4% in 2004, 13.6% in 2005, and
11.5% in 2006.
As the low-cost/must run resources of the grid constitute less than 50% of the total grid generation in
average of the five most recent years, then the simple OM method is selected for calculating emission
factor.
The data required to calculate the operating margin emission factor using method Dispatch data
analysis OM or Simple adjusted OM are not publicly available. Therefore, the calculation of EFgrid,
OM,,y is based on the Simple OM method.
According to the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” (Version 02.2.0, EB
61, Annex 12, 3 June 2011, the emission factor can be calculated using either of the two following
data vintages:
 Ex ante option: If the ex ante option is chosen, the emission factor is determined once at the
validation stage, thus no monitoring and recalculation of the emissions factor during the
crediting period is required. For grid power plants, use a 3-year generation-weighted average,
based on the most recent data available at the time of submission of the CDM-PDD to the
DOE for validation. For off-grid power plants, use a single calendar year within the 5 most
recent calendar years prior to the time of submission of the CDM-PDD for validation, or
 Ex post option: If the ex post option is chosen, the emission factor is determined for the year
in which the project activity displaces grid electricity, requiring the emissions factor to be
updated annually during monitoring. If the data required to calculate the emission factor for
year y is usually only available later than six months after the end of year y, alternatively the
emission factor of the previous year y-1 may be used. If the data is usually only available 18
months after the end of year y, the emission factor of the year preceding the previous year y-2
may be used. The same data vintage (y, y-1 or y-2) should be used throughout all crediting
periods.
“Ex ante option: A 3-year generation - weighted average” is selected for the calculation of the
emission reductions of this project. Ex-ante calculation of the average OM, EFgrid, OM,,y refers to the
three-year generation-weighted average (2004, 2005 and 2006) of the most recent statistics available
at the time of PDD submission.
Step 4. Calculate the operating margin emission factor according to the selected method
13Low-cost/must-run resources are defined as power plants with low marginal generation costs or power plants that are
dispatched independently of the daily or seasonal load of the grid. They typically include hydro, geothermal,wind, low-cost
biomass, nuclear and solar generation. If coal is obviously used as must-run, it should also be included in this list, i.e.
excluded from the set of plants.. (“Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”, page 5 of Version 02.2.1,
EB 63, Annex 19, 29 September 2011).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The simple OM emission factor (EFgrid,OM,,y or EFgrid,OMsimple,,y) is calculated as the generation-weighted

average CO2 emission per unit net electricity generation (tCO2/MWh) of all generating power plants
serving the system not including low-cost/must-run power plants/units. It may be calculated:
• Option A: Based on the net electricity generation and a CO2 emission factor of each
power plant/unit,
or
• Option B: Based on the total net electricity generation of all power plants serving the
system and the fuel types and total fuel consumption of the project electricity system.
The data on electricity generation and the fuel types for all power plants supplying electricity to the
JAMALI grid is available. Option A is selected for the simple OM calculation.
Option A-Calculation based on average efficiency and electricity generation of each plant.
Under this opinion, the simple OM emission factor is calculated based on the net electricity
generation of each power unit and an emission factor for each power unit, as follows:
 EG  EF m, y EL,m, y
EFgrid,OMsimple,y = m
……………………………....………..(1)
 EG m
m, y
Where:
EFgrid,OMsimple,y = Simple operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
EGm,y = Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by
power unit m in year y (MWh)
FEEL, m,y = CO2 emission factor of power unit m in year y (tCO2/ MWh)
m = All power unit serving the grid in year y except low-cost/must-run
power units
y = The relevant year as per the data vintage chosen in step 3.
The emission factor of each power unit m should be determined as follows:

Option A1, if for a power unit m data on fuel consumption and electricity is available, the emission
factor (EFEL,m,y) should be determined as follows :
 (FC
i
i,m, y  NCVi,y  EFCO2,i,y )
EFEL,m, y = ……………………………....……..(2)
EGm, y
Where:
FEEL,m,y = CO2 emission factor of power unit m in year y (tCO2/MWh)
FCi,m,y = Amount of fossil fuel type i consumed by power unit m in year y (mass or
volume unit)
NCVi,y = Net calorific value (energy content) of fossil fuel type i in year y (GJ /
mass or volume unit)
EFCO2,i,y = CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i in year y (tCO2/GJ)
EGm,y = Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power
unit m, in year y (MWh)
i = All fossil fuel types combusted in power unit m, in year y
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Option A2, if for a power unit m only data on electricity generation and the fuel types used is
available, the emission factor should be determined based on the CO2 emission factor of the type fuel
type used and the efficiency of the power unit, as follows:
EFCO2,m,i , y  3.6
EFEL,m, y = ……………………………....…………………………..(3)
 m, y
Where:
FEEL,m,y = CO2 emission factor of power unit m in year y (tCO2/MWh)
EFCO2,m,i,y = Average CO2 emission factor of fossil fuel type i used in power unit m in year y
(tCO2/GJ)
m,y = Average net energy conversion efficiency of power unit m in year (ratio)
m = All power units serving the grid in year y except low-cost/must-run power units
Where several fuel types are used in the power unit, use the fuel type with the lowest CO 2 emission
factor for EFCO2,m,i,y
The data on net electricity generation are obtained from the statistics Report of PT IP year 2002,
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, Statistic Report of PT PLN Pembangkitan Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2006,
Statistics report of PT PLN year 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Some coal consumption from IPPs
in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 are taken from Indonesia Mineral and Coal Statistics year of
2004 and 2006 issued by Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.
The net caloric values of the heavy oils are obtained from the Bahan Bakar Minyak, dan BBG untuk
Kendaraan, Rumah Tangga, Industri dan Perkapalan (published by Pertamina, May 2003). The net
caloric value of the gas is obtained from Table 1.4 of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National
Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 2, Chap 1, p. 1.23-1.24. The emission factors adopted are
obtained from Table 1.3 and Table 1.4 of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories, Volume 2, Chap 1, p. 1.23-1.24.
The data taken from above reference is not all available for fuel consumption used of power unit.
Therefore the emission factor is determined by two options, Option A1 and Option A2.
Step 5. Calculate the build margin emission factor.
In term of vintage of data, project participants can chose between one of the following two options :
Option 1. For the first crediting period, calculate the build margin emission factor ex-ante based on
the most recent information available on units already built for sample group m at the time of CDM-
PDD submission to the DOE for validation. For the second crediting period, the build margin
emission factor should be updated based on the most recent information available on units already
built at the time of submission of the request for renewal of the crediting period to the DOE. For the
third crediting period, the build margin emission factor calculated for the second crediting period
should be used. This option does not require monitoring emission factor during the crediting period.
Option 2. For the first crediting period, the build margin emission factor shall be updated annually,
ex-post, including those units built up to the year of registration of the project activity or, if
information up to the year of registration is not yet available, including those units built up to the
latest year for which information is available. For the second crediting period, the build margin
emission factor shall be calculated ex-ante, as described in option 1 above. For the third crediting
period, the build margin emission factor calculated for the second crediting period should be used.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Option 1 is chosen in the build margin (BM) emission factor calculation in the project activity.
The sample group of power units m used to calculate the build margin should be determined as per the
following procedure, consistent with the data vintage selected above:
(a) Identify the set of five power units, excluding power units registered as CDM project
activities, that started to supply electricity to the grid most recently (SET 5-units) and
determine their annual electricity generation (AEGSET-5-units, in MWh);
(b) Determine the annual electricity generation of the project electricity system, excluding
power units registered as CDM project activities (AEGtotal, in MWh). Identify the set of
power units, excluding power units registered as CDM project activities, that started to
supply electricity to the grid most recently and that comprise 20% of AEG total (if 20%
falls on part of the generation of a unit, the generation of that unit is fully included in
the calculation) (SET≥ 20%) and determine their annual electricity generation (AEGSET-≥
20%, in MWh);
(c) From SET5-units and SET ≥ 20% select the set of power units that comprises the larger
annual electricity generation (SETsample);
Identify the date when the power units in SETsample started to supply electricity to the
grid. If none of the power units in SETsample started to supply electricity to the grid more
than 10 years ago, then use SETsample to calculate the build margin. In this case ignore
steps (d), (e) and (f).
Otherwise:
(d) Exclude from SETsample the power units which started to supply electricity to the grid
more than 10 years ago. Include in that set the power units registered as CDM project
activities, starting with power units that started to supply electricity to the grid most
recently, until the electricity generation of the new set comprises 20% of the annual
electricity generation of the project electricity system (if 20% falls on part of the
generation of a unit, the generation of that unit is fully included in the calculation) to
the extent is possible. Determine for the resulting set (SETsample-CDM) the annual
electricity generation (AEGSET-sample-CDM, in MWh);
If the annual electricity generation of that set is comprises at least 20% of the annual
electricity generation of the project electricity system (i.e. AEG SET-sample-CDM ≥ 0.2 ×
AEGtotal), then use the sample group SETsample-CDM to calculate the build margin. Ignore
steps (e) and (f).
Otherwise:
(e) Include in the sample group SETsample-CDM the power units that started to supply
electricity to the grid more than 10 years ago until the electricity generation of the new
set comprises 20% of the annual electricity generation of the project electricity system
(if 20% falls on part of the generation of a unit, the generation of that unit is fully
included in the calculation);
(f) The sample group of power units m used to calculate the build margin is the resulting
set (SETsample-CDM≥10yrs).
The total set of power units (AEGSET ≥20% ), excluding power units registered as CDM project
activities that started supply electricity to the grid most recently and comprises 20% of AEG total (total
annual electricity generation) determined by steps (a), (b) and (c) in steps 5 is selected for calculation
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
of build margin emission factor in this project activity.
The build margin emissions factor is the generation-weighted average emission factor (tCO2/MWh) of
all power units m during the most recent year y for which electricity generation data is available,
calculated as follows:
 EG  EF
m, y EL,m, y
EFgrid ,BM , y = m
……………………………....……………………………..(4)
 EG
m
m, y
Where:
FEgrid, BM,,y = Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
EGm,y = Net quantity of electricity generated and delivered to the grid by power unit m in
year y (MWh)
EFEL,m,y = CO2 emission factor of power unit m in year y (tCO2/MWh)
m = Power units included in the build margin
y = Most recent historical year for which electricity generation data is available
Step 6. Calculate the combined margin (CM) emission factor

The calculation of the combined margin (CM) emission factor (EFgrid,CM,y) is based on one of the
following methods:
(a) Weighted average CM; or

(b) Simplified CM.
The weighted average CM method (option A) should be used as the preferred option. The simplified
CM method (option b) can only be used if:
• The project activity is located in a Least Developed Country (LDC) or in a country with less
than 10 registered CDM projects at the starting date of validation; and
• The data requirements for the application of step 5 above cannot be met.
Weighted average CM is selected for the calculation of the combined margin emission factor. The
calculation is as follows,
EFgrid,CM,y = EFgrid,OM, y x wOM + EFgrid,BM, y x wBM ……………………(5)
Where:
EF grid, BM, y = Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
EF grid, OM, y = Operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y (tCO2/MWh)
W OM = Weighting of operation margin emissions factor (%)
W BM = Weighting of build margin emissions factor (%)
The following default values for wOM and wBM is 0.5, respectively.
Selection of the Most Conservative Grid Emission Factor

This project activity has been two times published. The first time is November 2006 and the second
time is April 2008. In the first time of publication, the grid emission factor calculation used 5 years
data during 2001-2005, and the second time of publication, the data during 2002-2006 was used.
Based on a conservative consideration, the lowest value of both EF is selected to calculate GHG
emission reduction in the PDD. The data in the first and the second publication is recalculated using
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
“Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system” (tCO2/MWh) (Version 02.2.0, EB 61,
Annex 12, 3 June 2011).
2. Baseline Emission
The baseline emission is the MWh produced by the renewable generating unit multiplied by an
emission coefficient (measure in tCO2e/MWh) calculated in a transparent and conservative manner as
in equation (6). The EFgrid,CM,y of the JAMALI Grid is calculated as in equation (5).
BEy  EGPJ , y  EFgrid ,CM , y ………………..(6)
Where:
BE y = Baseline emissions in year y (tCO2/yr)
EG PJ,y = Quantity of net electricity generation that is produced and fed into the grid as
a result of the implementation of the CDM project activity in year y (MWh/y)
EFgrid,CM,y = Combined margin CO2 emission factor for grid connected power generation
in year y calculated using the latest version of the “Tool to calculate the
emission factor for an electricity system” (tCO2/MWh) (Version 02.2.0, EB
61, Annex 12, 3 June 2011).
The calculation of EGPJy is different for (a) green field plants, (b) retrofit and replacements, and (c)
capacity additions. In this case, the project activity is the installation of a new grid-connected
renewable power plant/unit as a site where no renewable power plants was operated prior to the
implementation of the project activity, then :
EGPJ , y  EG facility, y ………………………….(7)
Where:
EG PJ,y = Quantity of net electricity generation that is produced and fed into the grid as
a result of the implementation of the CDM project activity in year y (MWh/y)
EG facility,y = Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project plant/unit to the
grid in year y (MWh/y)
The baseline emissions (BEy in tCO2 e) are the product of the baseline emission factor (EFgrid,CM,y in
tCO2/MWh) times the electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid (EGfacility,y in MWh).
3. Project Emissions (PEy)

As specified in the “Threshold and criteria for the eligibility of hydroelectric power plants with
reservoirs as CDM project activities”, (EB 23, Annex 5), the project emissions resulted from the
reservoir of hydroelectric power plants with power densities greater than 10 W/m2 may be neglected.
Power Density (PD)

Power Density of the project activity is calculated as prescribed in ACM0002, Version 12.3.0, Annex
35, 2 March 2012, as follows:
CapPJ  CapBL
PD  …………………………............……………....(8)
APJ  ABL
Where, PD is power density of the project activity, in W/m2; CapPJ is installed capacity of the hydro
power plant after implementation of the project activity, in W; Cap BL is installed capacity of the hydro
power plant before the implementation of the project activity (W). For new hydro power plants,
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CapBL=0; APJ is the area of the reservoir measured in the surface of the water, after the
implementation of the project activity, when reservoir is full in (m2); ABL is area of the reservoir
measured in the surface of the water, before the implementation of the project activity, when the
reservoir is full (m2). For new reservoir, ABL =0.
The power density of the project activity is greater than 10 W/m2, the project emissions are neglected
or is considered zero.
(PEy=0)…………………………………………………………….. …(9)
4. Leakage (LEy)
This is not applicable as the renewable energy technology used is not equipment transferred from
another activity. Therefore, as per the Simplified Procedures for Small-scale CDM Project Activities,
no leakage calculation is required.
(LEy=0)………………………………………………………………….(10)
5. Emission Reductions (ERy)

In this project activity, project emission is zero due to a zero emission renewable generation power
project and leakage is considered to be negligible. Therefore, emissions reductions, ERy is equal to the
total baseline emission, BEy (equation (6).
ERy  BEy  PEy  Ly  BEy  EGy  EFgrid ,CM , y ………………..…(11)

where
ERy is the emission reductions in year y (tCO2 e/yr).
BEy is the baseline emissions in year y (tCO2e/yr).
PEy is the project emissions in year y (tCO2e/yr).
LEy is the leakage emission in year y (tCO2 e/yr).
PEy= 0 and LEy= 0,
In order to quantify emission reductions achieved by the project activity, procedures to calculate
project emissions, baseline emissions, leakage and emission reductions set put in methodology are
applied as follows.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
B.6.2. Data and parameters fixed ex ante

Data / Parameter Net Calorific Value (NCV)
Unit TJ/kt fuel (Terra Joule/kilo tonne fuel)
Description Net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel
Source of data 1) “Bahan Bakar Minyak, Elpiji dan BBG untuk kendaraan, rumah tangga,
industri dan perkapalan”, published by PERTAMINA 2003
2) Ministry of energy and Mineral Resources Directorate General of
Mineral, Coal and Geothermal, 2004, published by Ministry of energy and
Mineral Resources Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal,
2005
3) 1996 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Value(s) applied NCV for MFO is 41.02, HSD is 42.72, Coal is 25.75 and Gas is 43.33.
Choice of data The NCV data of coal, HSD and MFO are available, except NCV data of
or gas which is taken from IPCC’s value (default value).
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating carbon content in each kilo ton fuel.
Additional comment This data used in the first publication
Data / Parameter Net Calorific Value (NCV)

Unit TJ/kt fuel (Terra Joule/kilo tonne fuel)
Description Net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel
Source of data 1) “Bahan Bakar Minyak, Elpiji dan BBG untuk kendaraan, rumah tangga,
2) Ministry of energy and Mineral Resources Directorate General of
Mineral, Coal and Geothermal, 2006, published by Ministry of energy and
Mineral Resources Directorate General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal,
2007
3) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Value(s) applied NCV for MFO is 41.02, HSD is 42.72, Coal is 22.36 and Gas is 46.5.
Choice of data The NCV data of coal, HSD and MFO are available, except NCV data of
or gas which is taken from IPCC’s value (default value).
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating carbon content in each kilo ton fuel.
Additional comment Data provided in Appendix 4. This data used in the second publication
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter Density

Unit kt/kl (kilo tonne / kilo litre)
Description Liquid density of HSD and MFO
Source of data “Bahan Bakar Minyak, Elpiji dan BBG untuk kendaraan, rumah tangga,
Value(s) applied Density value for MFO is 0.000990 (kt/kl) and HSD is 0.000845 (kt/kl),
Choice of data The density data of coal and gas is not used in calculation.
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating t-CO2 in each kilo litre fuel
Additional comment Data provided in Appendix 4. This data used in the first and the second
publication
Data / Parameter Carbon Content

Unit t C/TJ (tonne Carbon/Terra Joule)
Description Carbon content in the fuel per unit of energy
Source of data 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Chapter
1: Introduction, Table 1-3, p.21.
Value(s) applied Residual Fuel Oil is 21.1, Natural Gas is 15.3, Sub-Bituminous Coal is
26.2, Gas/Diesel Oil is 20.2
Choice of data Use a lower value of default data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating t-CO2 in each kilo litre fuel.
Data / Parameter Carbon Content

Unit t C/TJ (tonne Carbon/Terra Joule)
Description Carbon content in the fuel per unit of energy
Source of data 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Chapter
1: Introduction, Table 1-3, p.21.
Choice of data Use a lower value of default data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating t-CO2 in each kilo litre fuel.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter OXIDi

Unit ---
Description The carbon oxidation factor for fuel i
Source of data 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Choice of data Use default data
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Data / Parameter OXIDi

Unit ---
Description The carbon oxidation factor for fuel i
Source of data 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Value(s) applied 1
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Data / Parameter EGfacility,y

Unit MWh (Mega Watt hours)
Description Electricity generated
Source of data a) Statistics PLN 2001 issued by PT PLN in 2002
b) Statistics PLN 2002 issued by PT PLN in 2003
c) Statistics PLN 2003 issued by PT PLN in 2004
d) Statistics PLN 2004 issued by PT PLN in 2005
e) Statistics PLN 2005 issued by PT PLN in 2006
f) Statistics report 2001 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2002
g) Statistics report 2002 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2003
h) Statistics report 2003 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2004
i) Statistics report 2004 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2005
j) Statistics report 2005 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2006
Value(s) applied -
Choice of data All data of generated electricity for the most recent five years (2001-2005)
or in the JAMALI grid is used to calculate the ratio of Low Cost and Must
Measurement methods Run Power Plants in the grid. Data for the most recent three year data
and procedures (2003, 2004 and 2005) in the grid is used to calculate the Operating Margin
emission factor(s) (EFOM,y).
Purpose of data The data is used for baseline emission calculations.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Unit MWh (Mega Watt hours)
Description Electricity generated
Source of data a) Statistics PLN 2002 issued by PT PLN in 2003Statistics PLN 2003
issued by PT PLN in 2004Statistics PLN 2004 issued by PT PLN in
2005
d) Statistics report 2002 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2003
e) Statistics report 2003 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2004
f) Statistics report 2004 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2005
g) Statistics report 2005 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2006
h) Statistics report 2006 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2007
Value(s) applied Available in Appendix 4
Choice of data All data of generated electricity for the most recent five years (2002-2006)
or in the JAMALI grid is used to calculate the ratio of Low Cost and Must
Measurement methods Run Power Plants in the grid. Data for the most recent three year data
and procedures (2004, 2005 and 2006) in the grid is used to calculate the Operating Margin
emission factor(s) (EFOM,y).
Purpose of data The data is used for baseline emission calculations.
Data / Parameter FCi,m,y

Unit kl (kilo litre) , kt (kilo tonne), MMBTU (Million Metric British Thermal
Unit)
Description Amount of fuel combusted per type of technology
Source of data a) Statistics report 2001 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2002
b) Statistics report 2002 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2003
c) Statistics report 2003 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2004
f) Company Statistics Report 2002-2006 issued by PT Pembangkitan
Jawa-Bali in 2007
g) Indonesia Mineral and Coal Statistics, Ministry of Energy and
Mineral Resources in 2004
Value(s) applied -
Choice of data The most recent three years data (2003, 2004 and 2005) is used for
or calculating CO2 emission.
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating t-CO2 emitted from each unit of power
generations connected to the JAMALI grid
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter FCi,m,y

Unit kl (kilo litre) , kt (kilo tonne), MMBTU (Million Metric British Thermal
Unit)
Description Amount of fuel combusted per type of technology
Source of data a) Statistics report 2002 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2003
b) Statistics report 2003 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2004
c) Statistics report 2004 issued by PT Indonesia Power in 2005
f) Company Statistics Report 2002-2006 issued by PT Pembangkitan
Jawa-Bali in 2007
g) Indonesia Mineral and Coal Statistics, Ministry of Energy and
h) Indonesia Mineral and Coal Statistics, Ministry of Energy and
Choice of data The most recent three years data (2004, 2005 and 2006) is used for
or calculating CO2 emission.
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating t-CO2 emitted from each unit of power
generations connected to the JAMALI grid
Data / Parameter Average Electricity Losses

Unit %
Description The average electricity losses refers to parasitic power and electricity
losses
Source of data
a) Statistics PLN 2001 issued by PT PLN in 2002
Value(s) applied -
Choice of data Data for the average electricity losses is used to calculate net electricity
or generated (electricity exported to the grid) in year 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Measurement methods and 2005.
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating average electricity losses in distribution
line (electricity exported to the grid).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter Average Electricity Losses

Unit %
Description The average electricity losses refers to parasitic power and electricity
losses
Source of data
a) Statistics PLN 2002 issued by PT PLN in 2003
Choice of data Data for the average electricity losses is used to calculate net electricity
or generated (electricity exported to the grid) in year 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Measurement methods and 2006.
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculating average electricity losses in distribution
line (electricity exported to the grid).
Data / Parameter EFCO2,i,y

Unit tCO2/GJ
Description The CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel type i
Source of data The data obtained from 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse
Gas Inventories
Value(s) applied -
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculate carbon content in each fuel type
Data / Parameter EFCO2,i,y

Unit tCO2/GJ
Description The CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel type i
Source of data The data obtained from 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse
Gas Inventories
Value(s) applied See Appendix 4
or
Measurement methods
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used for calculate carbon content in each fuel type
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter EFgrid,OMaverage,y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Average operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Source of data Calculation result using equation (1)
Value(s) applied 0.995
Choice of data The most recent three years data (2003, 2004 and 2005) of emission
or production in t-CO2, and power generation in MWh are used to calculate
Measurement methods average operating margin CO2 emission factor using equation (1).
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used to calculate EF grid, CM, Combined margin CO2 emissions
factor
Additional comment The data used to calculate EFgrid,OMaverage,y was described in the first
publication. The value is a value rounded down.
Data / Parameter EF grid, BM, y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Choice of data Emission production in t-CO2, and power generation in MWh generated in
or 2005 by the set of power units additions in the electricity system that comprise
Measurement methods 20% of the system generation, excluding power units registered as CDM
and procedures project activities that started supply electricity to the grid most recently and
comprises 20% of AEGtotal determined by steps (a), (b) and (c) in Steps 5 is
used to calculate Build Margin using equation (4).
factor
Additional comment The data used to calculate EF grid, BM, y was described in the first publication.
The value is a value rounded down.
Data / Parameter EF grid, CM, y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Combined margin CO2 emissions factor in year y
Choice of data Using average operating margin CO2 emission factor in year 2003, 2004,
or and 2005 and Build Margin CO2 emission factor in year 2005, Combined
Measurement methods margin CO2 emissions factor is calculated using equation (5).
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used to calculate Emission Reduction of the project activity
Additional comment The data used to calculate EF grid, CM, y was described in the first
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter EFgrid,OMaverage,y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Average operating margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Choice of data The most recent three years data (2004, 2005 and 2006) of emission
or production in t-CO2, and power generation in MWh are used to calculate
Measurement methods average operating margin CO2 emission factor using equation (1).
and procedures
factor
Additional comment The data used to calculate EFgrid,OMaverage,y was described in the second
Data / Parameter EF grid, BM, y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Build margin CO2 emission factor in year y
Choice of data Emission production in t-CO2, and power generation in MWh generated in
or 2006 by the set of power units additions in the electricity system that comprise
Measurement methods 20% of the system generation, excluding power units registered as CDM
and procedures project activities that started supply electricity to the grid most recently and
comprises 20% of AEGtotal determined by steps (a), (b) and (c) in Steps 5 is
used to calculate Build Margin using equation (4).
factor
Additional comment The data used to calculate EF grid, BM, y was described in the second
Data / Parameter EF grid, CM, y

Unit tCO2/MWh
Description Combined margin CO2 emissions factor in year y
Choice of data Using average operating margin CO2 emission factor in year 2004, 2005,
or and 2006 and Build Margin CO2 emission factor in year 2006, Combined
Measurement methods margin CO2 emissions factor is calculated using equation (5).
and procedures
Purpose of data The data is used to calculate Emission Reduction of the project activity
Additional comment The data used to calculate EF grid, BM, y was described in the second
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
B.6.3. Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions

>>
Project Emission
Power Density (PD)
Power Density of the project activity is calculated as follows:
CapPJ  CapBL
PD 
APJ  ABL
CapBL = 0 for a new plant

ABL = 0 for new reservoir
Cileunca SSHPP will use water flow discharged from tailrace of Palayangan Dam. The surface area of
Palayangan dam will not change after and before the Cileunca SSHPP implemented (APJ=ABL=0),
because the function as a drinking water source of Bandung city14 is a priority functuon and it will not
be changed due to the Indonesian regulation15. Water utilization as a source of drinking water is a
priority use of water in Palayangan Dam.
The following is the result of the power density calculation of the project activity at each project
location.
Table 11: Power Density for each SHPP

Item Symbol
SSHPP16 SSHPP17 SSHPP18
Reservoir length (m) 35 30 15.6
Reservoir width (m) 10 18 12.2
Area of reservoir (m2) APJ 350 540 0
Capacity (W) CapPJ 1,200,000 1,600,000 unlimitted
Power Density (W/m2) PD 3,428 2,963 unlimitted
The power density, PD of the project activity is greater than 4 W/m2, so that PEy=0.
PEy=0 (tCO2/year)
Baseline Emissions (BEy)

Based on the result of recalculation data, the grid emission factor calculation using data of 2001-2005
and 2002-2006 is compared. Both calculation results are shown, below.
Operating margin emission factor (EFOM)
14 Algae in Cileunca Lake caused drinking water produced by Tirtawening Co. became turbid, Pikiran Rakyat Newspaper, April
30, 2012
15
Regulation of the Government of The Republic of Indonesia , No 22/1982 regarding the regulation of water, Chapter VI
Article 13 states that Water for drinking is a major priority above all other purposes.
16
Studi Kelayakan dan Penyusunan Basic Design Proyek PLTA Siteki Banjarnegara-Jawa Tengah, Laporan Akhir, Lembaga
Pengambdian Kepada Masyarakat, Universtias Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, page 3-23
17
Studi Kelayakan dan Pembuatan Dokumen Lelang Proyek PLTM Plumbungan, Banjarnegara-Jawa Tengah, Laporan Utama,
PT Wiratman & Associates, page 7-4.
18
Studi Upaya Pengelolaan lingkungan (UKL) dan Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan (UPL) PLTMH Cileunca 2 x 500 kW),
Kecamatan Pengalengan, Kabupaten Bandung, page III-10
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
F i, y  NCVi , y  EFCO2,i , y
EFgrid ,OMaverage,20032005  i
EGy
= [76,150,847 (tCO2) 2003 + 75,814,643(tCO2) 2003 +85,290,247(tCO2)

2005 ]/[ 75,550,432 (MWh)2003 +79,214,690(MWh)2004 + 83,600,150(MWh)2005 ]
= 0.995 (tCO2/MWh)
F i, y  NCVi , y  EFCO2,i , y
EFgrid ,OMaverage, 20042006  i
EGy
= [67,931,586(tCO2) 2004+ 76,216,155(tCO2) 2005 + 79,939,063(tCO2)

2006]/[79,214,690(MWh)2004 + 83,600,150(MWh)2005 +88,523,659(MWh) 2006]
= 0.891 (tCO2/MWh)
Build margin emission factor
 EG  EFm, y BL, m, y
EFgrid , BM , 2005  m
 EG m
m, y
= 24,386,172(tCO2) 2006/23,030,000(MWh)2006
= 1.058 (tCO2/MWh)
 EG  EFm, y BL, m, y
EFgrid , BM , 2006  m
 EG m
m, y
= 24,282,652(tCO2) 2006/28,772,230(MWh)2006
= 0.843 (tCO2/MWh)
Combine margin emission factor
EFgrid,CM,y = EFgrid,OM, y x wOM + EFgrid,BM, y x wBM
EFCM2005 = wOM EFOM , y + wBM EFBM , y

= 0.5 x 0.995 (tCO2/MWh) + 0.5 x 1.058 (tCO2/MWh)
= 1.027 (tCO2/MWh)
EFCM2006 = wOM EFOM , y + wBM EFBM , y

= 0.5 x 0.891 (tCO2/MWh) + 0.5 x 0.843 (tCO2/MWh)
= 0.867 (tCO2/MWh)
Calculation result shows that EFCM2006 is lower than EFCM2005. Therefore, the emission reduction
EFCM2006 = 0.867 is used as a grid emission factor in the calculation.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The ex-ante emission reductions values and calculations are as follows:
Parameter Formula Value Unit

EF grid, OM, y Provided in section B.6.1 0.891 t-CO2/MWh
EF grid, BM, y Provided in section B.6.1 0.843 t-CO2/MWh
EF grid, CM, y Provided in section B.6.1 0.867 t-CO2/MWh
Baseline emission
BEy  EG facility, y  EFgrid ,CM , y

= 24,269 (MWh/year) x 0.867 (tCO2/MWh)
= 21,041 (tCO2/year)
Leakage
Ly=0 (tCO2/year)
Emission Reduction
ERy=BEy
= 21,041 (tCO2/year)
B.6.4. Summary of ex-ante estimates of emission reductions
Table 12: Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period
Baseline Project Emission
Leakage
Year emissions emissions reductions
(tCO2 e)
(tCO2 e) (tCO2 e) (tCO2 e)
01/05/2013-31/12/2013 14,027 0 0 14,027
01/01/2014-31/12/2014 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2015-31/12/2015 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2016-31/12/2016 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2017-31/12/2017 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2018-31/12/2018 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2019-31/12/2019 21,041 0 0 21,041
01/01/2020-30/04/2020 7,014 0 0 7,014
Total 147,289 0 0 147,289
Total number of
7 years
crediting years
Annual average over the
21,041 0 0 21,041
crediting period
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table 13 : Estimation of GHG emission reduction for each SSHPP

Siteki Plumbungan Cileunca Three
Item Unit
SSHPP SSHPP SSHPP SSHPPs
EFOM,average,y (tCO2 e/MWh) 0.891 0.891 0.891 0.891
EFBM,y (tCO2 e /MWh) 0.843 0.843 0.843 0.843
EFy (tCO2 e /MWh) 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867
EGy MWh/year 6,967 10,894 6,408 24,269
BEy (tCO2 e /year) 6,040 9,445 5,556 21,041
PEy (tCO2 e /year) 0 0 0 0
Ly (tCO2 e /year) 0 0 0 0
ERy (tCO2 e /year) 6,040 9,445 5,556 21,041
B.7. Monitoring plan

B.7.1. Data and parameters to be monitored

Unit MWh/yr
Description Quantity of net electricity generation supplied by the project pant/unit to
the grid in year (Electricity generated from Siteki, Plumbungan and
Cileunca SSHPPs)
Source of data Project activity site
Value(s) applied Net Electricity generated by the power plant
Measurement methods Electricity meter
and procedures
Monitoring frequency Continuous measurement and at least monthly recording
QA/QC procedures Cross check measurement result with records for sold electricity
Purpose of data Used for calculation of baseline emission
Additional comment The losses in the connected line between power generation and kWh meter
can be neglected, because it is too small compared with electricity
generated
B.7.2. Sampling plan

>>
Project activity does not involve any sampling for the determination of parameter values for
calculating GHG emissions.
B.7.3. Other elements of monitoring plan

>>
Sub unit in charge for monitoring
Organization Structure for monitoring
A monitoring organization structure of the project activity will consist of three monitoring sub-units.
Each sub-unit will have monitoring operational staff as given in Figure 3, responsible for monitoring
of all parameters considered in section B.7.1, data acquisition and recording for CDM purposes. This
will include persons responsible for the monitoring work, data collection and storage, data archiving
and data reporting. Each unit will have a person, assigned as the head of CDM monitoring for
supervising measurement and recording works, related to data collection (meter readings, sale
receipts) which will be carried out by the operational staffs. The CDM manager under the Business &
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Commerce Department is responsible for the overall data monitoring, verification process, calculating
emission reductions and preparing a monitoring report to the companies’ director as well as to a DOE.
The operational staffs of Siteki, Plumbungan & Cileunca Hydro Power Sub units are in charge of
metering for project activity. The CDM Manager will prepare a monitoring report which is a
compilation of monitoring reports from Mrica Generation Business Unit and Saguling Generation
Business Unit prepared by each head of CDM monitoring of that unit. This monitoring report will be
submitted to the Board of IP for an approval before it is sent to a DOE.
Business & Commerce

Department
CDM manager
Mrica Generation Saguling Generation

Business Unit Business Unit
Head of CDM Monitoring Head of CDM Monitoring

Hydro Power Hydro Power Hydro Power
Sub-unit (Plant Manager) Sub-unit (Plant Manager) Sub-unit (Plant Manager)
Monitoring staff Monitoring staff Monitoring staff
Figure 3 : Structure Organization for the monitoring
The following are the key items that are considered in the monitoring plan:
1. Training
In order to maintain and upgrade the ability and skill of the operator, there will be training performed
related to electrical engineering and operation of power generation. The operator of Siteki,
Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPP Sub-Units will be trained for implementing the monitoring process
before the hydro plants be put into operation to assure that they have fully understood the
responsibility and the requirements of the monitoring plan. Training for monitoring personnel will be
conducted before the commissioning.
All required statements for the measurement accuracy, possible monitoring data adjustments and
uncertainties are arranged in an agreement document between IP and PLN.
2. Monitoring equipment
The value metered by the grid company (PLN) will be taken as the actual supply to the grid and is
used in the calculation of the project’s emission reductions. The value metered by the measuring
instruments at the output side of the transformer of each power plant will be used as a plausibility
check of the value metered by the grid company.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Two electricity meters should be installed to the output side of the transformer, one for a-monthly
measurement and one for back up. If the meter for monthly measurement needs to be repaired or
calibrated, the backup meter should be put into operation.
If the backup meter fails to operate, the value from the grid should be the valid one. The data recorded
will be archived two years after the crediting period to which the record pertains.
3. Data collection and reporting

Based on the monthly electricity delivered to the grid and the log book, the shift in charge (monitoring
operational staff) will prepare a report constituting above parameter in a hard copy to be reported to
the Plant Manager and to be forwarded to the head of CDM monitoring of each Generation Business
Unit and to the CDM Manager on a monthly basis. The Plant Manager will compile the data and
report it to the CDM manager.
Based on the Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) of IP, the operator of the shift will record
generation production displayed in kWh meter, twice a day, and the shift engineer will verify these
records.
The daily report of the kWh value of net electricity generation will be summarized by the IP operator
and verified by the supervisor every 1st day of the month.
During the monitoring process, the operator of Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPP Sub-Unit
will record the meter twice a day, and fill the recorded data into electricity statistic sheets on site. All
records cannot be altered and all original data must be conserved. If the operator of Siteki,
Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPP Sub-Unit cannot reach the site to do a recording activity, the power
plant manager of the sub-unit will assign other employee to record in time and return the record to the
monitoring operator without any delay when the operator arrives. Both people will sign the recorded
data on handing over, including handing over between monitoring operator of different shifts. The
SSHPPs sub-unit manager will check and verify the electricity statistic sheets every month, and report
it to the Business & Commerce Department of IP after verification.
Monitoring of each project activities within the bundle will be executed with the same methods and
system. The result of the monitoring will be summarized in one report.
The procedure for review of reported results/data will be prepared before the commissioning of the
project activity.
4. Procedure for QA/QC

Quality assurance measures include procedures to handle and correct non-conformities in the
implementation of the project or this monitoring plan. In case such non-conformities are observed:
- An analysis of the non-conformities and its causes will be carried out immediately
by IP staff and PLN staff
- IP management will make a decision on appropriate corrective actions to eliminate
the non-conformities and its causes
- Corrective actions will be implemented and reported back to IP management
The procedure for emergency preparedness will also be prepared and ready before the commissioning.
5. Procedure for calibration

The metering data of each Small Scale Hydro Power Plant will be continuously measured using a
kWh-meter installed just before the connection point to the grid. According to the Indonesia
regulation the meters is calibrated at installation and re-calibrated once every 10 years by a
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Certification Service (Jasa Sertifikasi) that is an affiliate of PLN or by Central or Local Metrology
Unit. In this project activity, the recalibration time will be selected the shorter one between the
recalibration time of the meters used in the monitoring period and the recalibration time based on
PLN regulation. The selected recalibration time should not more than three years. Hence, the quality
control and the quality assurance procedures are already completed.
6. Procedure for corrective action

If required, technical meetings between the operators, CDM Manager and IP Manager of Business and
Commerce Department will be held in order to design and execute the corrective proceedings to be
undertaken.
7. Internal audit
The CDM manager will perform regular site audits to ensure that monitoring and operational
procedures are being executed according to the Monitoring Plan. Monitoring frequency should be as
per section B of PDD.
8. Data archive
All data and report will be kept until 2 years after the end of crediting period or the last issuance of
CERs for the project activity, whichever occurs later. All data recorded will be compiled and stored in
the plant.
SECTION C. Duration and crediting period

C.1. Duration of project activity
C.1.1. Start date of project activity
>>25-09-2006 (date of contracting work for mechanical and electrical equipment)
C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of project activity

>>30y-0m
C.2. Crediting period of project activity

C.2.1. Type of crediting period
>> Renewable crediting period
C.2.2. Start date of crediting period

>>01-05-2013 or the date of registration whichever the later
C.2.3. Length of crediting period

>>7y-0m
SECTION D. Environmental impacts

D.1. Analysis of environmental impacts
>>
As per the Decree of the Minister of the Environment (MENLH No.17, 2001) of the Republic of
Indonesia, an “Environmental Impact Assessment (hereinafter referred to as “AMDAL”) is not
required for a small hydroelectric power project whose capacity is less than 50 MW. Since the
capacities of Siteki, Plumbungan and Cileunca SSHPPs are 1.2 MW, 1.6 MW and 1 MW respectively,
these SSHPPs require no AMDAL. Instead, a submission of “The Environmental Management
Procedure and the Environmental Monitoring Procedure” (hereinafter referred to as UKL/UPL) is
required by the MENLH No.17 (2001).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Feasibility Study (FS) and UKL/UPL of a project as one package of work aiming at reducing the cost
of the study. If FS and UKL/UPL of a project is prepared separately then the cost of the studies could
be higher than that of a package study.
The UKL/UPKLs of all SSHPPs have already been submitted by IP, and the permissions for
developing power plants by the local government have already been granted.
In the case of the Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs, there is no water utilization between the intake of
the forebay and the tailrace, such as for farmland irrigation or for daily use by the local population.
Accordingly, the utilization of water for the SSHPP would have no negative impact on the irrigation
system in the canal. The water flow in the canal will still be maintained to preserve the ecosystem in
the canal.
In case of the Cileunca SSHPP, part of the outlet water stream from the Playangan dam flowing to
Playangan river is channeled into a water immersed penstock in the dam and a ground immersed
penstock outside the dam, and thereafter directly flows through a turbine. The water stream in the
river will still be maintained to preserve the river ecosystem. The water exiting the turbine is
discharged back to the river. There are no public activities that utilize river water between the outlet
stream of the dam and the tailrace of the SSHPP. For this reason, there would be no negative impact
through the utilization of the river water for the project activity.
The scale of the proposed project activity is small. Between the intake and tailrace of the SSHPPs
there is no water utilization so that the environmental impacts related to the project activity are
negligible. After being used for power generation, the water is returned to a canal or river. In brief, the
project activity will not result in a significant impact to the environment.
SECTION E. Local stakeholder consultation

E.1. Solicitation of comments from local stakeholders
>>
The stakeholders of this CDM project activity development include the government and non-
government parties of the Republic of Indonesia, such as local populations and the local government,
who are either indirectly or directly involved in different roles at different stages in the project
activity. All the necessary permits from the government parties have been obtained.
IP had organized a stakeholder’s consultation with the villagers surrounding Siteki SSHPP,
Plumbungan SSHPP and Cileunca SSHPP to inform related stakeholders regarding the environmental
and social impacts of the project activity and to discuss their concerns (anxiety) regarding the
development of the project activity. Invitations to the stakeholder’s consultation meeting were sent
out to the villagers, local communities and local state governments in the SSHPP’s regions, requesting
their participation and voice any suggestions/objections regarding the project activity. The
stakesholder’s meetings were held on the following dates:
1. 15th November 2005 at Tanjung Anom village, Rakit District, Banjarnegara

Regency for Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs projects.
2. 28th September 2006 at Wanasari and Pulosari villages, Pangalengan District,
Bandung Regency for the Cileunca SSHPP project.
In addition, an interview was conducted with the Serayu-Citanduy Water Resources Management
Agency in Purwokerto (hereinafter referred to as “BPSDA Serayu-Citanduy in Purwokerto”), as the
authorized irrigation canal owner. IP has received written approval from the elected local government
authorities (or Bupati/Regent/officer in charge of a regency) representing local communities. In terms
of applicable regulations, the developer must obtain approval from the Regent prior to starting
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
construction for any project (including small hydropower plant projects).
The details of the approval results will be available upon validation request.
E.2. Summary of comments received

>>
Generally, the agenda of the meeting for all three SSHPPs within the bundle was set as follows:
1. Registration
2. Introduction and welcome address
3. Description of the project activity, CDM, Environmental and Social issues
4. Discussion (question and answer session)
5. Reading the draft minutes of the meeting and signing of the minutes of the meeting.
The summary of the stakeholder’s comments for Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs is presented as
follows:
1. Generally, local villagers support the development of the Siteki and Plumbungan
SSHPPs and they expect that the development of the project activity could be
implemented soon.
2. The Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs will contribute to an increase of the economic
level of the villagers through the presence of economic activities during the
development of the project activity.
3. The development of the Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPP will encourage the
development of the area around the SSHPP sites, which will make the sites cleaner,
safer/ more secure and well arranged.
4. The Siteki and Plumbungan SSHPPs will have no influence on water use for fishery
and agriculture.
The interview with the BPSDA Serayu-Citanduy in Purwokerto has resulted in favorable comments.
The summary of the stakeholder’s comment for Cileunca SSHPP :

1. IP introduced a brief and the purpose of the meeting, the benefits of the hydropower
project and the increase in employment opportunities for the local villagers owing to
the manpower required in the development of the project activity.
2. Generally local villagers support the development of Cileunca SSHPP because this
would give direct as well as indirect benefits to the local community.
3. This project activity will not disturb land ownership in the local community or rafting
activity on the Playangan river.
4. The development of the project activity will be implemented according to the
prevailing regulations.
5. Recruitment of man power will be coordinated with head of the village of Wanasari and
Pulosari
E.3. Report on consideration of comments received

>>
There were no negative comments received during the consultation and interviews, which were
recorded and signed by the stakeholders.
SECTION F. Approval and authorization

>>
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Letter of Approval from each Party to be involved in the project activity will be made available at the
time of submitting the PDD to the validating DOE.
-----
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 1: Contact information of project participants

Organization PT. Indonesia Power
Street/P.O. Box Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 18
Building N/A
City Jakarta
State/Region N/A
Postcode
Country Indonesia
Telephone +62-215267666
Fax +62-215250824
E-mail agcc@indonesiapower.co.id
Website http://www.indonesiapower.co.id/
Contact person
Title Senior staff of Development & Commerce
Salutation Mr.
Last name Yuniarto
Middle name N/A
First name Eko
Department Development and Commerce
Mobile N/A
Direct fax N/A
Direct tel. N/A
Personal e-mail N/A
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Organization The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc.

Street/P.O. Box 4-33, Komachi, Naka-ku
Building
City Hiroshima
State/Region Hiroshima Prefecture
Postcode 730-8701
Country Japan
Telephone +81-82-523-6424
Fax +81-82-523-6422
E-mail N/A
Website http://www.energia.co.jp/
Contact person
Title Manager
Salutation Mr.
Last name Takeyama
Middle name
First name Takayoshi
Department Energia Division
Mobile N/A
Direct fax N/A
Direct tel. N/A
Personal e-mail N/A
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Organization Centre for Application and Assessment of Energy Resources Technology,

Agency for the Application and Assessment of Technology (BPPT)
Street/P.O. Box Jl. M.H. Thamrin
Building BPPT building 2nd, 22nd flr.
City Jakarta
State/Region
Postcode 10340
Country Indonesia
Telephone +62-21-316-9860
Fax +62-21-316-9867
E-mail N/A
Website N/A
Contact person
Title Researcher
Salutation Dr.
Last name Febijanto
Middle name N/A
First name Irhan
Department N/A
Mobile N/A
Direct fax N/A
Direct tel. N/A
Personal e-mail N/A
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 2: Affirmation regarding public funding

NOT APPLICABLE
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 3: Applicability of selected methodology

Applicability of selected methodology is discussed in section B.2 of PDD. The project activity meets
the applicability criteria of the methodology.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 4: Further background information on ex ante calculation of emission reductions
Table 14 : Fuel Specification
(A) (B) ( C) (D) (E) (F) (G)
Default Carbon Default Carbon Carbon CO2 emissions

Fuel Type Calorific value per mass Content Oxidation factor Density CO2 emissions
(A)x(B)x( C) (D) x 44/12 (E) x (F)
TJ/kt fuel (tC/TJ) - tC/kt fuel tCO2/kt fuel kt/k l tCO2/kl fuel
Data source PERTAMINA MEM IPCC IPCC IPCC - - -
MFO 41.02 20.6 1 844.99 3,098.30 0.00099 3.067
HSD 42.73 19.8 1 846.03 3,102.10 0.000845 2.621
Coal 22.36 25.30 1 565.61 2,073.90
Natural Gas 46.50 14.80 1 688.20 2,523.40
Note : HSD : High Diesel Speed, MFO : Marine Fuel Oil, IPCC : Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change;
PERTAMINA: Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara/State-Owned Oil Company of Indonesi; MEM:
Ministerial Energy and Mineral Resources, kt fuel: kilo tonne fuel; tC: tonne carbon, TJ: Terra Joule, kl fuel : kilo litre fuel
Table 15: Power Plants in the grid by source

source of plant operation year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
fuel GWh
Hydro 6,866 5,320 6,011 7,022 5,309
Diesel Oil 87 60 66 128 101
Gas Turbine Gas 64 485 1,545 2,601 2,038
Oil 1,013 1,622 1,844 1,946 1,702
Geothermal 5,851 5,945 6,241 6,183 6,182
Steam Coal 37,343 41,621 43,239 45,466 51,821
Gas 1,324 1,177 1,030 646 669
Oil 6,645 7,226 7,262 6,668 7,162
Combined Cycle Gas 19,016 18,098 17,486 16,559 16,193
Oil 4,457 5,219 6,566 8,980 8,444
Source : Statistics Report of PT IP in 2002, 2003,2004, 2005, 2006, Statistic Report of PT PLN
Pembangkitan Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2005
Table 16: Ratio of Low Cost and Must Run Power Plants in the most
recent five years (2002-2006)
Units 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
T otal Generation Net
GWh (net) 82,978 86,815 91,467 96,805 100,015
Low Cost and Must-run
generation GWh (net) 12,717 11,265 12,252 13,205 11,491
Low Cost and Must-Run
Generation/ T otal % 15.3% 13.0% 13.4% 13.6% 11.5%
Generation
Source : Statistics Report of PT IP in 2002, 2003,2004, 2005, 2006, Statistic Report of PT PLN Pembangkitan
Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2005
Table 17: Percentage of Average Losses

2002% 2003 2004 2005 2006
Average losses in Java-Bali system due to own consumption 4.21% 4.47% 4.26% 4.00% 4.23%
Source : Statistics report of PT PLN in 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table 18: Fuel Consumption in the grid during 2002-2006

year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Fuel Type unit
HSD kilo litre 2,055,555 2,331,137 3,428,468 4,406,883 3,623,332
MFO kilo litre 1,957,435 2,093,265 2,234,921 1,944,142 2,054,365
IDO kilo litre 112,143,100 95,853,373 82,952,705 71,110,280 72,760,818
Gas MMBTU 53,774,390 61,433,706 49,298,597 45,525,914 51,051,117
Coal ton 9,711,476 10,856,426 10,636,155 12,508,407 17,386,753
Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2005, Indonesia Mineral and Coal Statistics year of 2004, 2006 issued by Ministry of
Energy and Mineral Resources
Table 19: CO2 Emissions in the grid during 2002-2006
year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

fuel type t-CO2
HSD 5,388,173 6,110,549 8,986,954 11,551,648 9,497,746
MFO 6,004,082 6,420,716 6,855,221 5,963,308 6,301,397
IDO 6,431,358 5,498,582 4,758,672 4,082,131 4,080,575
Gas 7,357,779 8,297,385 8,403,536 7,660,363 8,474,282
Coal 36,671,510 39,255,975 40,663,629 43,969,235 45,779,901
TOTAL 61,852,901 65,583,207 69,668,012 73,226,685 74,133,902
Table 20: Three-year average (2004-2006) of Emission Factor Operating Margin
Item Unit 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL

Total Emissions tCO2 e 67,931,586 76,216,155 79,939,063 224,086,804
Total Generation MWH (net) 79,214,690 83,600,150 88,523,659 251,338,499
EFOM tCO2 e/MWh 0.891
Table 21: Sample plant group (M) for determining Build Margin Emission Factor
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
“The power plants

capacity addition to
the electricity
Sample group (m) “The five power plants that have been built system that
Comments
Classification recently” (GWh) comprises 20% of
system generation (
in GWh) and that
have been built most
recently”
8,168.2 28,772
Electricity quantity
Total generation is
Proportion
100,015 (GWh) in
8.17% 28.77% JAMALI grid
(ratio to total generation
in JAMALI grid)
O
Selected group
Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2005
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table 22: Sample group plants used in the Build Margin calculation and CO2 Emission Factor for Build Margin
Generated Power Fuel Consumption Effective CO2

Thermal convert
Capacity Capacity NCV emission
Power Plant calculation Efficiency value
factor
unit
operation Factor Actual Data Actual data calculation data
No. fuel type data Emission Reduction
year
MW MWh GJ/GWh GJ/k t fuel GJ/ k ltr fuel (t- CO2/GJ)(GJ/MMBTU) t-CO2
C=AxBx8760/
Owner Power Plant A B C D E F G= CxD/E G= 1000x CxD/E H I G=(ExF)xH/1000 G=ExGxH
1000
1 PT Paiton Energi Paiton I Steam-Coal 1999 1290 0 9,116.0 0 9,236 22356.08 0 4,437,332 - - ton 0.0928 - 9,202,579 -
2 PT Java Power Paiton II Steam-Coal Jul, 2000 610 0 9,109.0 0 9,236 22356.08 0 4,273,017 - - ton 0.0928 - 8,861,806 -
3 PT Magma Nusantara Listrindo Wayangwindu I Geothermal 2001 110 0 922.0 0 - 0 0 - - - 0 - - - -
4 Chevron Texaco Energi Indonesia Ltd. Darajad II Geothermal 2001 89.3 0 735.0 0 - 0 0 - - - 0 - - - -
5 PT Geo Dipa Energi Dieng Geothermal 2002 50 0 319.0 0 - 0 0 - - - -- - - - -
6 PT Cikarang Listrindo Power Cikarang GT-Gas 2003 150 0 403.0 0 9,119 46500 0 - 3,483,144 - MMBTU 0.0543 1 - 199,429
7 PT Krakatau Daya Listrik Krakatau Steam-Coal 2003 0 2.2 0 9,236 22356.08 0 - - 921 ton 0.0928 - 1,911 -
8 Muara Tawar Block 3 & 4 GT-Gas 2004 840 0 1,618.0 0 9,119 0 0 - 13,984,435 - MMBTU 0.0543 1 - 800,683
9 PT Sumberenergi Sakti Prima Cilacap #1 Steam-Coal 2006 562 0 1,937.0 0 9,236 22356.08 0 - - 800,231 ton 0.0928 - 1,659,599 -
10 Cilacap #2 2006 - 0 - 0 0 - - - 0 - - - -
11 Tanjung Jati B unit #1 Steam-Coal 2006 660 0 3,869.0 0 9,236 22356.08 0 - - 1,598,397 ton 0.0928 - 3,314,915 -
12 unit #2 2006 660 0 - 0 - 0 0 - - - 0 - - - -
13 Cilegon Cilegon CCGT-Gas 2006 740 0 742.0 0 6,003 46500 0 - 4,221,980 - MMBTU 0.0543 1 - 241,731
TOTAL 28,772.2 - 24,282,652
Source : Statistics Report of PT IP in 2002, 2003,2004, 2005, 2006, Statistic Report of PT PLN Pembangkitan Jawa Bali (PJB) 2002-2005
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table 23: Estimation of GHG emission reduction
Item Unit HEPPs

EFOM ,simple,y (tCO2 e/MWh) 0.891
EFBM ,y (tCO2 e /MWh) 0.843

EFy (tCO2 e /MWh) 0.867
EGy MWh/year 24,269
BEy (tCO2 e /year) 21,041
PEy (tCO2 e /year) 0
Ly (tCO2 e /year) 0
ERy (tCO2 e /year) 21,041
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 5: Further background information on monitoring plan
The following data is to be monitored to ascertain project emission and emission reductions.
How will the

Proportion
Measured (m), data be For How long is
ID Data Recording of data to
Data type Data variable calculated (c) or
frequency be
archived? archived data to be Comment
number unit estimated (e) (electronic/ kept ?
monitored
paper)
D.3.1 Electricity from Electricity kWh m Continuous 100% Electronic During the Meter is regularly
monitoring,
Siteki SSHPP Generated and Paper crediting period calibrated by
hourly
measurement and two years after Certification Service
and monthly
recording
monitoring,
Plumbungan SSHPP Generated and Paper crediting period calibrated by
hourly
measurement and two years after Certification Service
and monthly
recording
Cileunca SSHPP Generated monitoring, and Paper crediting period calibrated by
hourly and two years after Certification Service
measureme
nt and
monthly
recording
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 6: Summary of post registration changes
Not Applicable
-----
History of the document
Version Date Nature of revision

04.1 11 April 2012 Editorial revision to change history box by adding EB meeting and annex
numbers in the Date column.
04.0 EB 66 Revision required to ensure consistency with the “Guidelines for completing
13 March 2012 the project design document form for small-scale CDM project activities”
(EB 66, Annex 9).
03 EB 28, Annex 34  The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design document for
15 December 2006 small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking into account CDM-PDD
and CDM-NM.
02 EB 20, Annex 14  The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect guidance
08 July 2005 and clarifications provided by the Board since version 01 of this
document.
 As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD have
been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be found
at <http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.
01 EB 07, Annex 05 Initial adoption.
21 January 2003
Decision Class: Regulatory
Document Type: Form
Business Function: Registration

PDD Siteki Public 15 10

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PDD Siteki Public 15 10

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board Page 1

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD)

Title of the project activity Siteki, Plumbungan, Ketenger #4 and Cileunca

Methodology : AMS.I.D-Grid connected

CDM – Executive Board Page 2

SECTION A. Description of project activity

CDM – Executive Board Page 3

A.2. Location of project activity

A.2.2. Region/State/Province etc.

A.2.3. City/Town/Community etc.

A.2.4. Physical/ Geographical location

CDM – Executive Board Page 4

Figure 1 : Map illustrating the locations of the project activity

A.3. Technologies and/or measures

CDM – Executive Board Page 5

Table 1 : The nominal data of each SSHPP

A.4. Parties and project participants

Indonesia (Host) P.T. Indonesia Power No

A.5. Public funding of project activity

A.6. Debundling for project activity

CDM – Executive Board Page 6

SECTION B. Application of selected approved baseline and monitoring methodology

Title Reference Version

B.2. Project activity eligibility

B.3. Project boundary

CDM – Executive Board Page 7

Auxiliary Auxiliary Auxiliary

Siteki Plumbungan Cileunca

Electricity to JAMALI grid

Figure 2 : Project Boundary

Source Gas Included Justification/Explanation

B.4. Establishment and description of baseline scenario

CDM – Executive Board Page 8

Table 3: Parameters considered for the baseline calculation

Parameter SI Unit Description

B.5. Demonstration of additionality

CDM – Executive Board Page 9

Table 4 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Siteki SSHPP

Parameter Value Source

Total installed capacity 1.2 MW rev FSR page 8

CDM – Executive Board Page 10

Annual Operating expenses

Table 5 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Plumbungan SSHPP

Parameter Value Source

Total installed capacity 1.6 MW rev FSR page10

Foreign exchange rate Rp 9,260/US$ Yahoo Finance

Annual Operating expenses

Table 6 Key parameters considered in the investment analysis of Cileunca SSHPP

Parameter Value Source

Total installed capacity 2 x 0.5 MW rev FSR 11

CDM – Executive Board Page 11

Foreign exchange rate Rp 9,260/US$ Yahoo Finance

Annual Operating expenses

Project Internal Rate of Return (Project IRR) :

Project IRR Benchmark Project IRR

Table 8 :Condition at which benchmark value is reached

Siteki Plumbungan Cileunca

CDM – Executive Board Page 12

The initial investment is reduced by 24.43% 13.51% 35.30%

CDM – Executive Board Page 13

Table 9 :Sensitivity analysis of Project IRR