Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2
II. 5. Observation and Positinoning using GNSS/GPS Technology
Rizos (1999) said if distance measurement on the positioning system using
GNSS/GPS technology was devided into two, i.e. pseudorange and carrier phase.
Both of them have some differences. In some cases, distance measurement with
carrier phase is more accurate than pseudorange.
Positioning using GNSS/GPS technology consists of two method, i.e.
absolute and relative method. Absolute positioning just need one receiver to
acquire data from satellite, while relative positioning need more than two GPS
receivers that applied simultaneously (Sunantyo, 1999).
II.6. Positioning using RTK System of GNSS/GPS Technology
Positioning using GNSS-RTK System is a positioning system using two
phases. Base station on this system must transfer differential data correction to the
rover on a real time series using VHF/UHF frequency. The data correction is
needed to determine and increase the accuracy of rover’s position. In other hand,
the VHF/UHF frequency has a limit especially on its propagation (Seeber, 2003).
To eliminate the limit, now a day, it is a possibility to transfer data correction
using internet network by streaming NTRIP method (Lenz, 2004).
II.7. Hypothesis Test : The Differences Height Observation Resulted by Two
Methods
The used statictis test is significant parameter test which need a set of
parameter. The test analayze the results by computing a mean of difference height
value that resulted by different two methods, and it was devided by its standard
deviation (Somantri, 2006).
CHAPTER III
STUDY METHODOLOGY
III.1. Preparation
Some steps had done in a preparation procces were collecting data which
divided into supporting data and study instruments such as GPS receiver and Total
Station in completelly. In addition, choosing of the realiable SimCard provider
was very useful for having a good streaming process on the study area.
III.2. Identification of Problem and Study Area, Field Marking
The core problem in the study was determining of the difference height
value and contour pattern resulted between GNSS/GPS technology and terrestrial
3
method when they were applied for practical purposes like construction project.
The choosen of study area was Eastern parking area of UGM Mosque. The
location was choosen due to some reasons. One of them was an assumption that it
could be represented various relief topograhy. Next, field marking process was
done. The process was divided into two, i.e. polygon and detail spot height
marking. The interval of spot height was less than 5 meters, and it was created a
network pattern. Every single of spot height had uniquely identification. It was a
detail number which represented combination of row and coloumn. Coloumn was
represented in alphabet, while row in number.
III.3. GNSS/GPS Observation and Terrestrial Measurement
Extra-terrestrial measurement in the study was conducted by GNSS
observation using RTK NTRIP method. The observation used base station of
JOG2 which owned by GFZ and the antenna was set on the Geodesy and
Geomatic Engineering Building, Faculty Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
As a rover, Leica GNSS/GPS type Viva CS10 borrowed from the Department was
used.
Terrestrial topographic measurement started from polygon measurement,
up to detail measurement using Total Station and also waterpass. The
measurement of spot height and detail had a same location with GNSS
observation. Both of the measurements were planned to be done on the same day.
III.4. Data Processing
Data processing resulted from extra-terrestrial measurement started from
downloading raw data. Eliminating outlier data was needed to achive high
accuracy of 3D CQ which had range between 1 cm up to 7 cm. 3D CQ value
describes the observation quality of 3D coordinates. In the next step, it is a need to
convert geodetic coordinate into cartesian coordinate. The height value resulted
from extra-terrestrial observation is ellipsoid or geometric height. To transform
the value into orthometric height, undulation data is needed. Correlation between
geometric, orthometric, and undulation is represented below:
Orthometric height (H) = ellipsoid height (h) – undulation (N) ...............(III.1)
Terrestrial data processing consists of adjusment of base reference point of
polygon, waterpass data processing, and computing of detail coordinate. Finally,
resulted data from the methods were processed and created into topographic map
4
with the large scale on 1 : 500. To create a more reliable contour, surfer 10 was
used.
III.5. Final Report
The result of terrestrial measurement describes coordinates of polygon,
waterpass result, detail coordinates, and topographic map. In other hand, the result
of GNSS/GPS observation describes raw data quality, elimination of outlier data,
orthometric height, and planimetric coordinates, also topographic map. Analysis
of topographic map created from terrestrial and extra-terrestrial measurement
describes their differences on quantitatif comparation study, visual and graphic.
The significant test which applied to analyze of height difference between
terrestrial and extra-terrestrial measurement was expected to inform if they were
significant or not.
CHAPTER IV
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
IV.1. Terrestrial Measurement
IV.1.1. Polygon Measurement
Computing of polygon data could be done after three requirements of
terrestrial measurement accomplished. They were distance, angle, and azimuth.
Polygon measurement was conducting on the opened track, and also refered to the
fixed point which identified by code of P.1/Dtl-N2 and Dtl.H2. The geometry of
polygon can be seen on the Figure IV.1. Coordinates of the fixed point was
assumed as a local coordinate either planimetric or height. The result of polygon
computation can be seen on Table IV.1.
Keterangan :
Titik Poligon
5
Planimetric coordinate both of fixed points was determined by computing of data
resulted from extra-terrestrial measurement. In addition, to determine the
orthometric height of fixed points, levelling method by using waterpass instrument
was conducted. The orthometric height of fixed points were refered to the geodetic
height point, as called as Titik Tinggi Geodesi (TTG), number 832, and it is
located on the yard of Stasiun TVRI Yogyakarta. Its administration region is
Sinduadi Village, Sub district of Mlati, Regency of Sleman. The orthometric
height of TTG number 832 is + 137,756 m.
IV.1.2. The Result of Levelling
The point which had label P.3 on the polygon geometry was the connecting
point with the TTG. They had difference height for about + 5,625 m.
Table IV.1. The result of levelling measurement between TTG and P.3
Tolerancy + 22,762 mm
6
A9
142 984 POLA KONTUR HASIL PENGUKURAN
A8
141 728
A7 Cara pengukuran : Terestris
140 357
B9 Alat ukur : Total Station merek Foif
142 971 A6
B8
138 565 A5 OTS 635
141
142
139
141 630
8
145
144
137 835A4
140
143
13
B7 137 642
Lokasi : Parkir Timur Masjid
C9
143 017
140 302
A3 Kampus UGM
9140690 C8 B6 137 606
141 398 138 602 B5 A2
Tanggal Pengukuran : 10 September 2013
137 859B4 137 741
C7 137 660
D9 140 252 B3
143 011 C6
D8 138 475 C5 137 605
141 400 B2
137 853 C4
D7 137 727
E9 140 240 137 670 B1
143 010 C3
D6 137 526
E8 137 578
9140680 138 479 D5 C2
141 398
E7
137 843D4 137 709
137 636
140 244 C1
F9 D3
143 026 E6 137 504
F8 138 492 E5 137 572
141 407 137 848E4 D2
F7 137 641 137 678
G9 140 257
142 980 E3 D1
F6 137 585 137 489
G8
138 502 F5
141 743
9140670 137 852F4 E2
139
141
138
G7
144
137 657
140
143
142
140 131 137 766
H9 F3 E1
142 977 G6 137 579 137 486
H8 138 372 G5
F2
UTARA
141 485 137 881G4 137 681
H7 137 678
I9 140 270 F1
G3
142 991 H6 137 490
I8 137 611
138 149 H5 G2
141 492
9140660 137 862 H4 137 679
J9 I7 137 664
140 228 G1
142 970 H3
J8 I6 137 494
137 585
141 413 138 141 I5
H2
137 861 I4 137 685
J7
K9 137 655
140 207 I3 H1
142 988 137 495
J6 137 592
K8 138 154 J5 LEGENDA
141 514 137 853 J4
9140650 137 668
L9 I1
J3 g1
142 977
L8
K6
137 574 J2
137 498
137 460 Nomor detil dan elevasi
138 149 K5
141 550 137 853 K4 137 663
138
L7
141
137 638 Kontur mayor
139
M9
140 161 144
140
K3 J1
142 960 L6
M8
137 569 137 491
138 179 L5
141 535
M7
137 857 L4 Kontur minor
140 238 137 642
N9
K1
9140640 M6 L3
142 947 138 218 M5 137 543 137 487 Batas areal penelitian
L2
137 854 M4
137 641
N7 137 645
140 309 M3
L1
N6 137 485
137 542 M2
138 304 N5
137 341
137 850 N4
137 667 Skala :
M1
N3
137 059
9140630 137 540
P.1/n2 0 5 10 30 m
137 589
N1
137 483
7
0,017 m, while on the slope are it would be increased for about 0,012 m up to
0,051 m.
IV.2.5. The Topographic Map Resulted from Extra-Terrestrial Measurement
Creating of topographic map resulted from extra-terrestrial measurement
had the same processes with terrestrial measurement. The topographic map
resulted from extra-terrestrial measurement can be seen on Figure IV.
a9 POLA KONTUR HASIL PENGUKURAN
142 979
a8
141 738
a7 Cara pengukuran : Pengamatan GNSS/GPS
140 352 Alat ukur : GNSS/GPS merek Leica
b9
142 916 a6
b8 138 525 a5 Tipe Viva CS 10
144
141 579 Lokasi : Parkir Timur Masjid
143
141
139
137 865a4
145
140
142
b7 137 671
138
c9 140 262 Kampus UGM
9140690 142 952 b6 a3a
c8
138 531 b5 137 570 Tanggal Pengukuran : 10 September 2013
141 346 a2a
137 850b4
c7
137 648 137 635
d9 140 197
b3
142 966 c6
d8 137 633
138 459 c5
141 354 b2
137 675c4
d7 137 625
137 627
e9 140 219 b1a
c3
143 010 d6 137 523
9140680 e8 137 447
141 353 138 462 d5
c2
e7 137 631d4 137 693
140 165 137 595
f9 c1
143 029 e6 d3 137 473
f8 137 515
138 381 e5
141 386 d2
137 595e4
f7 137 643
140 259 137 557
g9 d1
f6 e3
142 978 g8 137 548 137 447
138 550 f5
141 759
9140670 g7 137 709f4 e2
138
144
137 697
140
137 702
139
142
141
143
140 380
h9 f3 e1
143 033 g6 137 567 137 441
h8 138 413 g5
f2
UTARA
141 530 137 768g4 137 661
h7 137 734
i9 140 235 f1
g3a
142 932 h6 137 446
i8 137 540
138 143 h5 g2
141 485
9140660 137 682 h4 137 614
i7 137 637
j9 140 214 g1
142 900 h3 137 460
i6
j8 137 650
138 173 i5
141 437 h2a
137 618 i4 137 724
j7
137 620
k9 140 089 h1
142 959 j6 i3 137 476
k8 138 196 j5 137 575 LEGENDA
141 521 137 716 j4
137 583
9140650 l9 i1
j3 g1
142 975
l8
k6a
138 087 k5
137 548 j2
137 492
137 460 Nomor detil dan elevasi
141 537 137 656
137 578 k4
138
l7 137 625
140
m9
140 183 j1 144 Kontur mayor
139
141
142 951 l6
k31 137 435
m8
138 113 l5 137 503
141 447
m7
137 811 l4 Kontur minor
140 212 137 564
n9 k1
9140640 m6 l3 137 516
142 884 138 145 m5 137 442 Batas areal penelitian
137 519 m4 l2
137 537
n7 137 576
140 289 m3 l1
n6 137 503 137 428
138 253 n5 m2
137 826 n4 137 285
137 627 Skala :
m1
n3
137 000
9140630 137 458
n2 0 5 10 30 m
137 589
n1
137 571
b8
2
138 565 A5
1399
141 630
8
141
14
138.525
142
144
145
14
145
137 835A4
139
143
1400
3
141 630
8
13
2
144
145
141 579
13
144
137 835A4
140
141.579
143
14
14
13
143
14
14
141
139
137 865a4
145
14
140
142
B7 137.865
B7 137 642 b7
137 642
137 671
138
C9
C9 140 302 137.671
140 302 c9 140 262 143 017 140.262 A3
143 017 A3 a3a 9140690
9140690 C8 B6 9140690 142 952 b6 142.952 C8 B6 137 606
137 606 c8 137 570 141 398 138 602 B5 137.570
141 398 138 602 B5 138 531 b5 A2
A2 141 346 a2a 141.346 138.531
137 859B4
137 859B4 137 741 137 850b4 C7 137.850 137 741
C7 137 660 c7 137 635 137 660 137.635
D9 137 648 D9 140 252 137.648
140 252 d9 140 197 140.197 B3
143 011 C6
B3 b3 143 011 C6
137 605 142 966 c6 142.966 D8 138 475 C5 137 605
D8 138 475 C5 d8 137 633 137.633
141 400 138 459 c5 141 400 138.459 B2
B2 141 354 b2 141.354 137 853 C4
137 853 C4 137 675c4 D7 137.675 137 727
D7 137 727 d7 137 625 137 670 137.625
140 240 137 670 137 627 E9 140 240 B1
E9 B1 e9 140 219 b1a 140.219 137.627 C3
143 010 C3 c3 143 010 D6 137 526
D6 137 526 143 010 d6 137 523 143.010 E8 137 578 137.523
E8 137 578 e8 137 447 9140680 138 479 D5 137.447
9140680 138 479 D5 C2 9140680 138 462 d5 141 398 138.462 C2
141 398 141 353 c2 141.353 137 843D4 137 709
E7
137 843D4 137 709 137 631d4 137 693 E7 137.631
137 636 137.693
e7
137 636 137 595 140 244 137.595 C1
140 244 C1 f9 140 165 c1 F9 140.165 D3
F9 D3 E6 137 504
143 026 E6 137 504 143 029 e6 d3 137 473 143 026 137 572 137.473
137 572 f8 143.029 F8 138 492 E5
F8 138 492 E5 138 381 e5 137 515 138.381 137.515
141 407 D2 141 386 141 407 137 848E4 D2
137 848E4 137 595e4 d2 141.386 137.595 137 678
137 678 f7 137 643 F7 137 641
F7 137 641 137 557 G9 137.557 137.643
G9 140 257 140 259 140 257 E3
g9 d1 142 980 140.259 D1
142 980 E3 D1 e3 F6
F6 142 978 f6 137 447 142.978 G8 137 585 137 489
G8 137 585 137 489 g8 137 548 138 502 F5 137.548 137.447
138 502 F5 138 550 f5 141 743 138.550
141 743 141 759 9140670 141.759 E2
9140670 137 852F4
138
99
9140670 e2
11
1313
141
1414
138
138
g7
13
137.709
144
137 657
1400
143
1422
144
G7
3
137 702
144
137 657
140
140 131
14
143
142
14
137 766
14
139
142
141
143
L7
11
137 638
1399
L7 l7 137 625
140
M9
1414
141
137 638
139
140 161
1400
M9 m9 137.625
13
142 960
141
14
140
8
Figure IV.4. (a) Contour pattern resulted from terrestrial measurement, (b) contour
pattern resulted from extra-terrestrial measurement, (c) contour patter resulted
from overlaying between (a) and (b)
- 6,238
-1,960 0 +1,960
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION, AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
V.1. Conclusion
Visual analysis of the topographic map shows the same contour pattern
which resulted from terrestrial and extra-terrestrial measurement. The mean height
difference both of them was – 0,041 m. The difference appeared due to of
geometric height resulted of GNSS/GPS observation. It value did not depend on
9
the slope of topography, but on the obstruction condition and phenomena around
of study area.
V.2. Suggestion
For developing on the next study, it is a need to acquire data on the more
coverage study area which has a high various topography condition. Due to having
a more strength of NTRIP signal, it is a must to make sure the fit and proper
provider card which will be used.
V.3. Bibliography
Abidin, H.Z., 2007, “Penentuan Posisi GPS dan Aplikasinya”, Edisi I, PT,
Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta.
Anggreni, D., 2010, “Pemodelan Geometrik dan Kinematik Kawasan Sulawesi-
Kalimantan Bagian Timur Berdasarkan Data GNSS-GPS dan Gaya Berat
Global”, Disertasi, Program Studi Teknik Geodesi dan Geomatika, Institut
Teknologi Bandung.
Basuki,I., Iskandar, H., 1999, “Penggunaan Global Positioning System (GPS)
untuk Pembuatan Peta Situasi pada Sub-Das Jeratun Seluna”. Makalah pada
Seminar Penerapan Sistem Informasi Geografi dan Radiotracking untuk
Pengelolaan Keanekaragaman Hayati. Bogor :Institut Pertanian Bogor
(IPB).
Diggelen, F.V., 2009, “A-GPS Assisted GPS, GNSS, and SBAS”, Artech House,
London.
Heliani, L.S., 2012, “Pendahuluan Geodesi Fisis”, Power Point Mata Kuliah
Geodesi Fisis, Jurusan Teknik Geodesi, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah
Mada, Yogyakarta.
Hofmann,W.B.,Moritz, H., 2005, “Physical Geodesy”, Springer, Wien, New
York.
Lenz, E., 2004, “Networked Transport of RTCM via Internet Protocol (NTRIP) –
Application and Benefit in Modern Surveying Systems”, Papers, FIG
Working Week 2004, Athens, Greece, May 22-27, 2004.
Rizos, C., 1997. “Principles and Practiceof GPS Surveying”, School of Geomatic
Engineering, UNSW, New South Wales, Australia.
Seeber, G., 2003, “Satellite Geodesy 2nd Edition”, Walter de Gruyter, New York.
Somantri, A. dan Muhidin, S.A., 2006, “Aplikasi Statistika dalam Penelitian”,
Penerbit Pustaka Setia, Bandung.
Sunantyo, A.T., 1999, “Pengantar Survei Pengamatan Satelit Global Positioning
System”, Diktat Mata Kuliah, Jurusan Teknik Geodesi, Fakultas Teknik
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
10