Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Access to opportunities and services is one of the primary determinants of empowerment for women in urban areas making gender
sensitive urban transport services critical aspect of urban infrastructure. Women have complex mobility needs due to their multiple
roles in the household and have to consider many socio-economic factors in their choice of the mode they use for making their
trips. These range from the welfare needs and time constraints to patriarchal attitudes and lack of safety on the streets. This is
illustrated very clearly by the lower mode shares of women cycling in Indian cities, even though they usually have access to slower
and cheaper modes of travel in a household. Using case study data, this paper shows that while men make choice of cycling based
on two simple indicators of income and availability of bicycle, women’s choices additionally take into account factors like trip
time, number of people in the household and whether different types of modes are available to others in the household before
making their choices.
Keywords: Gender Dimension of Urban Mobility, Bicycle as a Mode Choice
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I. INTRODUCTION
wheelers. This corroborates with the fact that women are users of the slower and cheaper modes of transport when compared to
men. However, the lesser use of bicycle (only 5% women use bicycles compared to the 19% usage by men) illustrates that more
factors than the mode being available and affordable features in the decision making of mode choice for women.
The separate models for female and male respondents shows clear distinction in the indicators of MLH mode choice. The MLH
choice for female respondents is dependent on more socio-economic indicators like HH income and size, vehicle ownership and
trip time. In case of male respondents, it mostly depends on the vehicle ownership and the HH size only comes into the picture
when choosing four wheelers and PT for MLH. This dependency on separate set of indicators for MLH between male and female
clearly establishes the fact the women are driven by multiple factors while making the transportation mode choice as compared to
men and as supported by literature, are concerned about other household demands before making their choices.
REFERENCES
[1] Akar, G., and K. J. Clifton, 2009.. Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike. In Transportation Research Record:
Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2009, pp. 165-172.
[2] Arora A., 2013, Socio-Economic Impact of the Cycle – A gendered social perspective of cycling in India, Cyclist and Cycling Around the World, ed Juan
Carlos Dextre, Mike Hughes and Lotte Bech
[3] Bell, C., Garrard, J., Swinburn, B., 2006. Active transport to work in Australia: is it all downhill from here? Asia Pac. J. Publ. Health. 18 (1), 62–68.
[4] Brown, M. Why Aren't Women On Wheels? San Francisco Bicycle Coalition. http://www.sfbike.org/?women_mb. Accessed May 15,
2009. http://www.sfbike.org/?women_mb
[5] Byrnes, J.P., Miller, D.C., Schafer, W.D., 1999. Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 125 (3), 367–383.
[6] DeGruyter, C., 2003. Exploring bicycle level of service in a route choice context. Transp. Eng. Aust. 9, 5–11.
[7] Garrard, J., Rose, G., Kai Lo, S., 2008. Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure, Journal of Preventive Medicine (46),
55-59
[8] Garrard, J., Crawford, S., Hakman, N., 2006. Revolutions for women: increasing women's participation in cycling for recreation and transport, summary of
key findings. Deakin University, Melbourne.
[9] Krizek, K.J., Johnson, P.J., Tilahun, N., 2005. Gender differences in bicycling behaviour and facility preferences. Research on Women's Issues in
Transportation, Conference Proceedings 35. Technical Papers, vol. 2. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
[10] McGinley, F., 2003. Cycling in Melbourne 1997–1999: final report to VicRoads based on data from the Victorian Activity & Travel Survey (VATS) 1997–
1999. Transport Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne.
[11] McGuckin, N., and Y. Nakamoto, 2005.. Differences in Trip Chaining by Men and Women. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in
Transportation, Report of a Conference, Volume 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., pp. 49-
56.
[12] Pucher, J., Dijkstra, L., 2003. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am. J. Public Health
93, 1509–1516.
[13] Tilahun, N.Y., Levinson, D.M., Krizek, K.J., nd. Trails, lanes, or traffic: the value of different bicycle facilities using an adaptive stated preference survey.
Active/ Communities Transportation Research Group, University of Minnesota.