September Oktober

No. Kegiatan
1 2 3 4 1
Identifikasi Latar Belakang &
1
Akar Masalah
Studi Literatur & Kerangka
2
Pemikiran
3 Metodologi Penelitian
4 Submit & Revisi Proposal KA
5 Desain & Penyebaran Kuisioner
Pengumpulan Data Kuisioner &
6
Profil Responden
Analisis Data Kuisioner &
7
Penulisan Bab Analisa
Penarikan Kesimpulan &
8
Penyusunan Saran
9 Finalisasi Dokumen KA
10 Sidang
11 Revisi KA

MINGGU KE 3 & 4 OKTOBER

 Oktober November Desember
2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3

NGGU KE 3 & 4 OKTOBER TIDAK ADA BIMBINGAN

ember
4
Number Title Author Year
Building customer-based Project
1 Pinto& Rouhiainen 2001
organizations
Project Planning, scheduling and
2 Lewis 2001
control
Project management – A system
3 approach to planning, scheduling and Kerzner 2003
control
Project
A guide to the project management
4 Management 2004
body of knowledge
Institute
The fast forward MBA in project
5 Verzuh 2004
management
6 Teamwork and project management Smith 2007
Number Title Author Year
9 Measurement of project success De Wit Anton 1988
Wateridge
10 IT projects: a basis for success 1995
John
Criteria of project success: an
Lim &
11 exploratory re-examination 1999
Mohamed

Cost, time and quality, two

best guesses and a
Atkinson
12 phenomenon, its time to 1999
Roger
accept other success criteria

The Project Excellence Model:

14 linking success criteria and 2003
critical success factors Westerveld E.
Using Probabilistic Feature
Models to Determine Success
15 Milis Koen 2004
Criteria for ICT Projects

Client versus contractor

perspectives on project
17 2005
success criteria
Bryde & Robinson
Defining “success” for
Agarwal &
18 software projects: An 2006
Rathod
exploratory revelation
 The relationships between key
stakeholders’ project
performance and project
19 success: Perceptions of 2006
Chinese construction
supervising engineers
Agarwal & Rathod
Boukanos K.
20 The Criteria of Project Success 2007
Anastasios
Journal/ Conference/ Book Rank Total Cost Time Quality
x x x

x x

x x
BOOK

x x x

x x x
x x
Journal/ Conference/ Book Rank Total Cost Time Quality
x X
x
x x

x
x

x x

x x
x

OLD PAPER x
x

x
x

x x
 x x x

THESIS X X
X
Customer Acceptance Performance Scope
x

x x

x x

x x
Customer Acceptance Performance Scope

x x

x
X
Good Relation Customer Satisfaction

x x

Good Relation Customer Satisfaction

x

x x

x
x

X
Project Team Satisfaction Functionality Benefit

Project Team Satisfaction Functionality Benefit

x x

x x

x
x

x
X
Number Title Author

ERP System Implementation: A Case for User

1 Samwel Matende, Patrick Agao
Participation

An Investigation of the Idea of Indovidual Katharina Smolarczyk, Georg

2
Learning in Enabling Organizational Change Hauer
Approaches to changing organizational
3 structure: The effect of drivers and Pavel Kral, Vera Kralova
communication
Fagno Fonseca, Patrick
Letouze, Rubens Pompeu,
4 Barriers in IT ProjectManagement
Leandro Garcia, Selma Regina,
George Franca
Change Management Guidelines that address Richard Gareth Smuts, V.V.
5 barriers to technology adoption in an HEI Madhavi Lalitha, Habib Ullah
context Khan
Enterprise System and Government
6 Organizational Changes: A Socio-Matriality Loni hagen, Donghee Sinn
Analysis
Readiness for change, change beliefs and
resistance to change of extension personnel in Mohamed MohamedMohamed
7
the New Valley Governorate about mobile Abdel-Ghany
extension
Sayeed Haider Salih, Ab Razak
User Resistance Factors in Post ERP
8 Che Hussin, Halina Mohamed
Implementation
Dahlan
Towards Project Management 2030: Why Is
9 Robert Bierwolf
Change Needed?
The Role of User Resistance in the Adoption of
10 Screenshoot Annotation for Computer Software Travis K. Huang
Learning
The Need for Integration Between
11 Organizational Project Management and J. Pollack
Change Management
The Effects of Switching Cost on User
12 Resistance to Enterprise System Hee Wong Kim
Implementation
 Technology Adoption: A Case Study of ERP
13 Implementation in One of Healthcare Chonyacha Suebsin
Organization in Thailand
Technical Communicators ad Agents and
Adopters of Change: A Case Study of the
14 Grace Leinbach Coggio
Implementation of an Early Content-
Management System
Roles of User Resistance and Social Influence
15 Saesol Choi, Jaeheung Yoo
in Continued Use of Smartphone
Review Paper: Critical Factors of User
Komeil Raisian, Jamaiah
16 Resistance in POST-ERP Implememtation
Yahaya
within an Organization
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Abdulmajid Wahdain,
17
Factors, Theories and Applicstions Mohamad Nazir Ahmad
Exploring the Impact of Organizational Culture
18 on Employess in Multinational Enterprise: A Chutinon Putthiwanit
Qualitative approach
How to improve the effectiveness of strategic Christodoulos Akrivos,
19
Changes Panagiotis Reklitis, Fani Prifti
Humanizing User Influence Tactics in the
Kunal Mohan, Frederik
20 Quest to Reduce Resistance Against IT Project
Ahlemann, Anol Bhattacherjee
Management Methodology Use
Identifying IT User Mindsets: Acceptance,
21 Liette Lapointe, Anne Beaudry
Resitance and Ambivalence
If We Implement it, will they come? User
22 resistance in post-acceptance usage behaviour Ales Popovic
within a business intelligence systems context
Impact of Cultural Factors on attitude toward Tomas Escobar-Rodriguez,
23
using ERP systems in public hospitals Lourdes Bartual-Sopena
Juris Iljins, Viktorija
Impact of Organizational Climate during
24 Skvarciany, Elina Gaile-
theProcess of Change
Sarkane
Impact of TAM-based external factors on ERP
25 Simona Sternad, Samo Bobek
acceptance
Individual Attributes of Change Readiness: A
26 Case Study at Indonesia State-Owned Railway
Company
Investigating the Factors Influencing Users
27 Nurul Nadiah Ahmad
Resistance towards Accrual Accounting
Leading Change: Why Transformation Effort
28 John P. Kotter
Fail
 Managing User Resistance in Enterprise
29 Shari Shang, Tim Su
Systems Implementation
Model of Post-Implementation User Pei Hung Ju, Hsiao-Lan Wei,
30
Participation within ERP advice Network Chung-Che Tsai

Managing User Resistance in IS-

31 Willian Joneros, Sara Sivnert
Implementation

Navigators through the Storm: A review of Allard van Mossel, Frank J.

32 organization theories and the behavior of van Rijnsoever, Marko P.
incumbent firms durig transitions Hekkert
Overcoming resistance to change in Brian C.Lines, Kenneth T.
33 engineering and contruction: Change Sullivan, Jake B. Smithwick,
management factors for owner organizations Josh Mischung
Organizational Change via Social Hubs: A Kadir Alpaslan Demir, Baris
34
Computer Simulation Based Analysis Egemen Ozkan
The Impact of ERP Partnership Formation
Ahmed Elragal, Moutaz
35 Regulations on the Failure of ERP
Haddara
Implementations
The Management model of strategic change Andrea Sujova. Rastislav
36
based on process principles Rajnoha
Wustari L.H. Mangundjaya,
The role of leadership employee condition on
37 Dharayati B. Utoyo, Permata
raction to organizational change
Wulandari
Campbell, Roberth H,
User Resistance to Information System
38 Grimshaw-Aagaard, Mark
Implementation
Nicholas
Year Journal/ Conference Rank Total

Conference on Enterprise Information System/ International

2013 Conference on Project Management/International 2
Conference on Health and Social Care IS and Technologies

2013 Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 130 1

2016 Journal of Business Research 1

2017 Technology & Engineering Management Conference 1

2017 International Advance Computing Conference 2

2012 ICEGOV 2

2014 Annuals of Agricultural Science 1

2014 Journal Of Information Systems Research and Innovation 1

2017 IEEE Engineering Management Review 1

2015 Hawaii International Conference on System Science 0

2016 IEEE- IEEM 2

2011 IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 1

2010 IEEE 3

2015 IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication 1

2015 ICACT 0

2014 International Journal of Research in Social Science 3

2014 Journal Of Information Systems Research and Innovation 0

2015 International Strategic Management Conference 0

2013 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences) 1

2012 Hawaii International Conference on System Science 1

2014 Hawaii International Conference on System Science 0

2017 Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 1

2015 Spanish Accounting Review 1

2015 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1

2013 Procedia Technology 1

2015 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1

2016 Procedia Economics and Finance 1

1995 Harvard Business Review 1

2004 AMCIS 1

2015 Asia pacific Mangement Review 2

Master Thesis 15 HEC, INFM10 in Informatics (School of

2014 Economics and Management Department of Informatics 0
Lund University)

2017 Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1

2015 International Journal of Project Management 2

2015 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1

2013 Procedia Technology 0

2012 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1

2015 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1

2016 0
 Change Management
Change Management Project Management
Role

X X
X

User Influence Tactics

X

X
X

X X

The Elaboration
Likelihood Model
 Project
IT Project IT Project Success
Implementation

barriers

Human Factors

User Resistance

User Resistance X
X user resistance X

User Resistance

X X

Perceived Ease of Use Perceived Usefulness User Acceptance

Employess Satisfaction

acceptane resistance

X User Resistance Post Acceptance use

X TAM

values of leader and

life experience
follower

X
X X

Implementation
Strategies

implementation
failure

User attitudes User Resistance

Implementation Success Concept-8 Concept-9

User Resistance Factors

Learning Organization

User Acceptance
IT user behavior

employee participation

traits of leader and

follower

Users Resistance
resistance to change

User Participation

User Resistance

Resistance to change

User Acceptance
Concept-10
 12
Relasi Kotter Ke
CSF

Incease Urgency (perlu ditunjukkan fakta/

data yang dapat dilihat, dirasakan,
1 disentuh agar orang-orang mau dan 10,3,32 1
merasa perlu untuk berubah)

Build The Guiding team (change agents)

2 10,3,12 2
Get The Right Vision (strategi/arah
perubahan yang jelas)

3 7,15 3

Communicating for Buy In (ada contoh

nyata visi yang sudah diaplikasikan -
4 bentuk komunikasi yang tulus, sederhana, 10,17,3,15,11,18 4
tidak rumit )

Empower Action (Menghapus sebanyak

mungkin rintangan &
5 melepaskan orang untuk melakukan 2,5,8,11,4,19 5
pekerjaan terbaik mereka)

Create Short Term Win ( terus

mengupayakan adanya penghargaan agar
semangat para pendukung perubahan
tetap menyala, dibutuhkanlah perayaan
kecil dalam bentuk pemberian
penghargaan, dibutuhkanlah milestone-
6 milestone kecil untuk memberi tanda 6,5,27 6
sudah sampai dimana proses perubahan
yang dijalankan)

Don’t Let Up (mengkomunikasikan bahwa

perubahan belum selesai, lakukan jika
perlu perubahan sistem, struktur,
kebijakan-kebijakan, prosedur hingga
7 kultur organisasi sehingga sesuai dengan 3 7
kondisi yang diinginkan
 Make change stick (tertanam sebagai
budaya, jangan ada yg terlewat sehingga
8 terjadi illusion of speed”) 17,11 8

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22
23
 24
25
26
27

28

29

30
31

32

1 & 11
CSF Project Succes

Ada Framework

Struktur Manajemen Jelas

Bantuan dari Top Manajemen

Keahlian Pihak Luar (penggunaan

konsultan)

Kerjasama dan Team Proyek yang

Seimbang

Riset

Business Plan, Vision, Strategy

Manajemen Proyek

Manajemen yang Mau Berubah

Keikutsertaan User,

Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek

Terkait

Kehadiran Champion, Project Sponsor

BPR (Business Proccess Re-Engineering)

dan Kustomisasi Software yang minimal

Disiplin dan standarisasi

Komunikasi yang efektif

Pengetahuan yang cukup tentang teknik

dan bisnis proses
Change Management Program and
Culture

Memonitor dan mengevaluasi

performance

Software Development, Testing dan

Troubleshooting pada software

Ekspektasi Manajemen

Hubungan kerja dengan

vendor/pelanggan
Penggunaan alat-alat development dari
vendor
Pemilihan paket yang tepat
Isu Hardware, Informasi dan Akses
Sekuriti
Pendekatan Implementasi
Pasif Terhadap Hambatan
Milestone (ShortTerm Wins), delivering
early message succes
Finance, cost

Time

Scope

Quality
Stakeholder Acceptance
Penulis

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; De Wit 1988)

(Summer 1999; Nelson and Somers 2001; Parry and Proctor-Thomson,

2003; Rosabeth Moss Kanter 1990; Morris and Hough 1987)

(Holland and Light 1999; Sumner 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and
Somers 2001; Zachary and Johnson, 2003; Guth and MacMillan, 1989;
Jones et al. 2004; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Heller
1998; Austin & Currie 2003; Kitchen and Daly’s article 2002; Todryk 1990;
Thornberry 1987; Rogers 1990; Graetz, 2000; Strobel, 1999; PMBOK, 2002;
Bingi 1999; Buckhout 1999; Wee; Holland et al.; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987)

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Summer 1999; Nelson and Somers 2001;
Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004)

(Wee 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau
2004; Buckhout et al.1999; Bingi et al.1999; Rosario 2000; Wee 2000;
Stefanou 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987; Belassi and
Tukel 1996)

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999)

(Holland and Light 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Jones et al. 2004; CMA 1995;
Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Strobel, 1999; Buckhout
et al 1999; Falkowski et al; Holland et al 1999; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Rosario;Wee 2000; Buckhout et al 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and
Hough 1987; )
(Holland and Light 1999; McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Kuang et al. 2001;
Nelson and Somers 2001) Rosario 2000; Holland et al. 1999 Sumner 1999;
Wee 2000; Falkowski et al 1998; Belassi and Tukel 1996; Rockart 1979)

(Holland and Light 1999; McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Kuang et al. 2001;
Nelson and Somers 2001; Fui Hoon et al 2001)
(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; CMA 1995; Jones, Agure and Calderone
2004; , Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Bryde &
Robinson 2007; Pinto and Covin 1989; Pinti and Mantel 1990; Pinto and
Slevin 1987; Pinto and Slevin 1988; Pinto and Slevin 1989 )

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Somers 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001;
Falkowski et al. 1998; Sumner 1999; Fui Hoon et al 2001)

(Sumner 1999; Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001; Rosario 2000;
Falkowski et al. 1998; Fui Hoon et al 2001; Morris and Hough 1987)

(Kuang et al. 2001; Nelson and Somers 2001; Bingi et al 1999; Holland et al
1999; Sumner 1999; Roberts and Barrar 1992; Rosario 2000; Fui Hoon et al
2001)
(Sumner 1999)

(Sumner 1999; Kuang et al. 2001;Chomsky 1988; Nelson 2003; Van

2002;Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004; Stefanou 1999;
Falkowski et al 1998; Wee 2000; Rosario 2000; Holland et al 1999;
(McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Nelson and Somers 2001; Fui Hoon et al
2001 ; Morris and Hough 1987)

(Sumner 1999)

(Kuang et al. 2001; Falkowski 1998; Rosario 2000; Roberts and Barrar 1992;
Bingi et al 1999; Holland et al.1999; Sumner 1999; Wee 2000;

(Kuang et al. 2001;Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004;
McCredie and Updegrove 1999; Holland et al; Rosario 2000; Sumner 1999;
Morris and Hough 1987; )
(Kuang et al. 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau 2004;Wee
2000; Holland et al 1999; Rosario 2000; Scheer and Habermann 2000;
Bryde & Robinson 2007;Morris and Hough 1987;)
(Nelson and Somers 2001)

(Nelson and Somers 2001; Pinto and Slevin 1986; Belout and Gauvreau
2004)
(Nelson and Somers 2001)

(Nelson and Somers 2001)

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999)

(McCredie and Updegrove 1999)

(Kotter 1998; CMA1995; Higgins and McAllaster 2004; Graetz, 2000)
(Gill 2003; Kotter 2002; Holland et al; Rosario 2000; Wee 2000)

(Morris and Hough 1987; Bryde and Robinson 2007, Chan 2002; Abdullah
and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and Mohamed,
1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Morris, 2001, Chan et
al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer, 2005; Wateridge, 1998, Lim
and Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Belassi
and Tukel 1996)

(Morris, 2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer,
2005; Abdullah and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and
Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Morris,
2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer, 2005;
Wateridge, 1998, Lim and Mohamed, 1999, Globerson and Zwikael, 2002,
Kerzner, 2003; Belassi and Tukel (1996)

(Morris, 2001, Chan et al., 2002, Bryde and Brown, 2004, Jha and Iyer,
2005; Westerveld, 2002; Belassi and Tukel 1996)
Abdullah and Ramly 2009; Atkinson, 1999; PMBOK;
(De Wit 1988; Wateridge, 1998, Lim and
Mohamed, 1999; Globerson and Zwikael, 2002, Kerzner, 2003; Pinto and
Slevin 1989; Van Aken 1996; Wateridge 1995)
Manajemen Perubahan Relasi Kotter Fokus Criteria Customer Criteria Customer Satisfaction
Kotter Ke Bryde& Satisfaction Bryde & Bryde & Robinson (2007)
Robinson Robinson (2007)

Incease Urgency Customer Focus Fully satisfying the customer’s

needs takes precedence over the
objectives

Build The Guiding team Measuring overall customer

(change agents) satisfaction

Get The Right Vision Making prompt responses to

customer requests

Communicating for Buy In Taking corrective action to meet

(ada role model) customer requirements

Empower Action Stakeholder Providing development

focus opportunities for project team
members

Create Short Term Win Providing organization learning

Don’t Let Up Fully satisfying stakeholders’ needs

taking precedence
Make change stick Measuring overall stakeholder
(tertanam sebagai budaya) satisfaction

Time Focus Evaluating suppliers/subcontractors

based on schedules
Making additional resources

Taking corrective action to control

progress against the project
schedule
Minimizing the project duration
precedence over other objectives

Cost Focus Taking corrective action to control

project costs

Relaxing deadlines to fully meet

costs

Evaluating suppliers/subcontractors
based the agreed budget

Minimizing the project cost taking

precedence over other objectives
Technical Focus Evaluating suppliers/subcontractors
based on technical specifications

Taking corrective action to control

conformance to technical
requirements
Relaxing other constraints to meet
technical specifications

Meeting the technical specification

precedence over the objectives
Manajemen Perubahan Relasi Kotter Ke Fokus CSF Chan 2002 CSF Chan
Kotter Chan

Incease Urgency Pre-construction phase Objective measures

Build The Guiding team

(change agents)

Get The Right Vision Subjective

measures

Communicating for Buy In

(ada role model)

Empower Action

Create Short Term Win Construction phase Objective measures

Don’t Let Up
Make change stick
(tertanam sebagai budaya)

Subjective
measures

Post Construction phase Objective measures

Subjective
measures
Sub CSF Chan

Time

Cost

Quality

Technical Pefomance

Satisfaction of Key
Project Participants

Time

Cost
Health & Safety

Quality

Technical Pefomance

Productivity

Satisfaction of Key
Project Participants

Profitability

Satisfaction of key
project participants, end
user and outsiders due
to:
Hipotesis Model Perubahan Kotter CSF
Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
H1 Incease Urgency
Stakeholder Acceptance
H2 Build The Guiding team Kehadiran Champion, Project Sponsor, Change Agent
H3 Get The Right Vision Business Plan, Clear Vision, Strategy to stakeholder
Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
Keikutsertaan User
H4 Communicating for Buy In
Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek Terkait
Memonitor dan mengevaluasi performance
Keahlian Pihak Luar
Kerjasama dan Team Proyek yang Seimbang
H5 Empower Action
Manajemen Proyek, Tim Manajemen Proyek
Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek Terkait
H6 Create Short Term Win Milestone (ShortTerm Wins)
H7 Don’t Let Up Bantuan dari Top Manajemen
H8 Make change stick Change Management Program and Culture
 Rujukan
Stratman & Roth 2002, Fui-Hoon 2001, Berson, 2008, Puelle 2012
Stratman & Roth 2002, Fui-Hoon 2001, Berson, 2008, Yong and Mustaffa, 2013
Weisbord 1987, Fui-Hoon 2001, Caldwell, 2003, Lunenburg 2010
Roberts Barrar 1992, Falkowski et al. 1998, Buckhout et al. 1999, Fui-Hoon 2000, Banihashemi 2017, D.Ford 2012
Wee 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Schiuma 2012
Sumner 1999, Stefanou 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001. Fernandez-Perz et al 2014, Vakola et al 2014,
Rosariio 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Hadi 2014
Rosario 2000, Sumner 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Bakaret al., 2010, Yong and Mustaffa, 2013
Rosario 2000, Fui-Hoon 2001, Taylor 2008
Fui Hoon 2001, Farokhi and Murty 2014; Shahzad et al. 2013
Rosario 2000,Fui-Hoon 2001, Lie et al 2011, Tabish and Jha 2011, Yong and Mustaffa 2013
Sumner 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Ates and Bititci 2011
Holland et all 1999, Fui-Hoon 2001, Wee 2000, Calder 2013
Fui Hoon 2001, Lunenburg 2010, Vakola 2014
Ribert&Barrar 1992, Fui-Hoon 2001, Juris Iljins 2015 Lunenburg 2010, Avila 2012
Kelompok
1
2

3a
3b
4
5
6a
6b
6c
6d
7a
7b
7c
7d
8
9
10
Hipotesis
terkait jabatan responden sampai tahap implementasi proyek TI
terkait jumlah keterlibatan responden hingga tahap implementasi proyek TI

Proses Increase Urgency memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam men
Proses Increase Urgency memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Stakeholder Acceptance dalam menunjan
Proses Build The Guiding Team memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Kehadiran Champion dalam menu
Proses Get The Right Vision memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Business Plan, Vision dan Strategi dal
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Keikutsertaan User dalam menunja
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Pr
Proses Communicating Buy In memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor memonitor dan mengevaluasi perfo
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Keahlian Pihak Luar dalam menunjang e
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Kerjasama dan Team Proyek yang Seimba
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Manajemen Proyek dalam menunjang efek
Proses Empower Action memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proyek T
Proses Create Short Term Win memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Milestone (critical Path) dalam men
Proses Don't Let Up memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Bantuan dari Top Manajemen dalam menunj
Proses Make Change Stick memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap faktor Training dan Pendidikan tentang Proye
Pertanyaan terkait Hipotesis Jawa
Apakah Jabatan anda pada proyek?
Apakah anda terlibat sampai tahap implementasi proyek? (Ya / T
Skala Lik

Sangat Setuju
 Jawaban

(Ya / Tidak)
Skala Likert (1-5)
Sangat Tidak
Setuju Netral Tidak Setuju Setuju