Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1
The Problem
Introduction
Teaching styles refers to the way teachers teach, which includes their distinctive
strategies. The teachers’ predominant teaching style affects the way they present
information and how they interact with pupils. The manner and pattern of those
interactions with pupils clearly show their effectiveness in promoting pupil learning and
self-esteem.
Teaching styles affect teachers’ effectiveness. Each style plays important role in
determining how pupils receive and process information. Understanding the different
types of teachers will help improve the teaching styles, resulting in better classroom
Obviously, a teacher cannot reach every pupil on the same level during one
lesson, but implementing a variety of teaching styles throughout the lesson allows all the
pupils will have the chance to learn in at least one way that matches their learning style.
In Iligan City Central, North 1,North 2,Northeast 1-A,East 1,South 1-A and South
1-B the Science teachers use teaching styles in a number of ways. Their styles can be
characterized as autocratic, permissive, and democratic. These styles reflect the teachers’
view of child behavior and classroom teaching practices (Dreikurs, 1972). Autocratic
teachers have low opinion of human nature and believe that students cannot or will not,
control their own behavior. Permissive teachers, have a naively optimistic view of
human nature, believing that if left alone, children will make good decision and behave
favorable. Democratic teachers act as leaders who provide opportunities for pupils to
Shindler (2004) says as teacher become more knowledgeable of her own teaching
preferences, it is easier to teach in ways that will work better for the pupils. Tuckman
(1995) posited that effective teaching involves effective organization and management,
that which causes pupils to learn and grow or one which is accepted by teachers and
other educational professionals. He also specified that no single approach is best. This
implies that there is no standard teaching style that is teacher should strive to follow.
The main reason that Science teachers vary their styles in delivering instruction is
to improve academic achievement and to make the lesson enticing to the pupils. For
most teachers, academic achievement is a reflection of the various efforts exerted as well
Philippines, particularly in the basic education level which lags very far behind other
countries in the world. This is manifested in the result of the Third Internal Mathematics
and Science Study (TIMSS) and Second International Science Study (SISS) which
placed the Philippines far from other participating nations. The Philippines rank
seventeen 17 almost at the bottom of the list during the SISS and similar outcomes were
revealed in the 1995, 1999 and 2003 TIMSS ( The Australian Education Journal,
Volume 34,No. 1 April 2007). There are many factors to consider behind these dismal
Parallel to this, pupils in the Division of Iligan City also felt the difficulty in
approaching Science subjects. This claim is manifested in the Mean Percentage Scores
(MPS) in the National Achievement Test (NAT). Scientific ability of intermediate pupils
in the seven 7 districts for a year had been noted below 75%. In the year 2009-2010, the
MPS of the North I pupils was 47.78, City Central 45.27, East 46.92, South I-A 39.38,
Northeast 1-A 38.39, South 1-B 24.26 and North II District 45.00. These results for a
year did not meet the regional MPS of 75%. These results are saying that the pupils of
Iligan City have low scientific ability. The report from the Trends in International
Mathematics and Science Study (Boston College, 2003) revealed that the Philippines
ranked to the last in terms of average achievement in Science. This exposed the reality
Science. It is on this context that the researcher finds it significant to conduct the study
in the hope of finding whether the teaching styles of Science teachers have any
learning process and raise the academic achievement of intermediate pupils, particularly
in Science.
This study is anchored on Dreikurs (1972). These theories affect or influence the
teachers teaching styles of their teachers. Their styles can be characterized as autocratic,
permissive, and democratic these styles reflect the teachers’ view of child behavior and
Teachers should constantly reflect their teaching styles and should incorporate
new changes as per the needs of learning. Teachers should be able to find the strength as
well as weaknesses of their teaching styles. There are different types of teaching styles
complex for teachers. They need to understand how a particular teaching style can
influence the learning of pupils and what are the merits and demerits of teaching style.
Teachers should adopt a teaching style that can promote some important
characteristics among pupils. These are: Autocratic style, Permissive style and
Democratic style.
expects children to obey and if they do not this type of teacher has a little management
abilities beyond constant yelling at the pupils to get them back in line. Pupils may obey
this teacher but mostly out of fear, and the teacher will blame the discipline problem in
Permissive teacher is one who really just wants to friends with her pupils. She
may plead with pupils to raise their hand of follow other simple rules, but does not have a
firm discipline plan in place. While pupils may say they like this type of teacher, when it
comes down to a difficulty, pupils know that the teacher will not take care of a problem
and will often try to take matters into their own hands as a result.
Democratic teacher is one who has an orderly classroom, a strong discipline plan
and is caring and supportive. Pupils respect this teacher and know that they can go to her
with problems of any kind no matter how big or small. With this style of teaching is
this study, the teachers teaching styles really affect the learning performances of the
children which require resources. The teachers must engage in responsive, flexible and
The researcher, being a teacher will pursue a study of this nature to explore
further the teachers’ teaching styles in relation to the learning achievement in Science of
classroom activities. Balsamo (2008) posited that pupils who are engaged tends to learn
more and are receptive for further learning. For pupils to be engage, teaching styles must
be appropriate otherwise they will make the pupils bored and non-participative (Dasari
2006). In Science, teaching styles must be varied to make the subject matter attractive to
pupils considering it is difficult and demanding being both conceptual and mathematical
tool in terms of the level of literacy acquired by the learner and the necessary action the
teacher has to do base on results. It determines how pupils are progressing towards the
standard set at the beginning of the lesson or the desired learning competencies required
although it goes without saying that seatwork, assignments, and evaluated projects are
included in quantifying (Corpuz and Salandanan 2003). This is consistent to one type of
learning acknowledged until at present by the Philippine elementary schools which is the
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Objectives which are Cognitive (Mental skills and Knowledge),
manual or physical ) skills. Examinations are formative evaluation of the mental skills or
the cognitive domain gained by the learners. The conceptual paradigm of the study is
shown in Figure 1. The independent and dependent variables are presented. The left box
shows the Independent Variables which are the teacher teaching styles describe by
Dreikurs (1972) namely the autocratic, the permissive and the democratic. The right box
shows the Dependent Variables which is the pupils’ achievement in intermediate Science.
The teachers teaching styles could passively influence the academic achievement in
intermediate Science, as shown by the line connecting the two boxes. These two
theoretical variables are connected with a straight line to show their correlation. It means
that the influence of the theoretical variables is vice-versa, affixing on the idea of
Teaching Styles
(Dreikurs 1972)
Pupils’
Achievement
In
Autocratic Intermediate
Permissive Science
Democratic
This study ascertained the interaction of the teachers’ teaching styles and
intermediate pupils in Science in the Division of Iligan City for the S.Y. 2011-2012.
Science?
Null Hypothesis
The result of the study would be greatly beneficial to the following groups of
people.
To the pupils. The pupils, being the recipients of learning will be greatly
benefited, since the result of the study shall point out the needed areas to be improved by
the teachers. It shall also give them the benefits of experiencing highly competent
teachers who will be the products of training seminars planned by the administrator.
teaching practices which will be the basis for a personal and professional development
program. The awareness that they gain from the results of the study will allow them to
This study will be conducted in the Division of Iligan City this School Year
2011-2012. There are 13 Districts constituting this division ( DepEd Masterlist of Public
Schools, 2008) but the researcher administered the teachers’ inventory to 7 District only
following the systematic random sampling with proportionate allocation. From the
sampled schools, there are 118 Science teachers, who serve as respondents of the study.
Teachers who are non-science majors but handling Science subjects are tap as well.
The study assesses the teachers’ teaching styles and pupils’ achievement in
intermediate Science using the Grasha’s Teaching Style Inventory (1994). The Science
academic achievement test of pupils is assessing using Table of Specification (TOS). The
test items are extracted from the First and Second Grading Periodical Test of Grade IV, V
and VI. The data are delimited to the responses of the intermediate pupils sampled. The
data are statistically treated using mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage and
Definition of Terms
To attain better understanding of the study, the following terms are defined
(Galton 1980) or instructional format (Siedentop, 1991). In this study it refers to the
assessment of teachers by the pupils through the results of the Teaching Styles Inventory
designed by Grasha (1996) which are classified as Expert, Formal, Authority, Personal
the performance in terms of quality and quantity of work done (Brown 1989). In this
study, achievement is the grade obtained by pupils in the first and second grading on
Science subject.
Chapter 2
Review of Literature
This chapter presents the literatures that are relevant to the present studies that are
important to the present investigation. The literature presented consists of concepts and
principles of teaching styles and its impact on the academic achievement of pupils.
On Teaching Styles
Bank (2002) stressed that a teacher can be a multicultural teaching styles. Every
teacher has a unique style of interacting with pupils and every teacher has a distinctive
style of teaching. There is no one “right” way to practice in teaching there is no single
preferred style. Teachers can vary their styles based on individual situation.
and doing things to the pupils, but is redefined as facilitation of self-directed learning”.
In the study of Salem (2001) teaching styles refers to the procedures or processes
adopt and employ by the teacher in order to achieve the day-to-day objectives of the
lesson. They are also the conglomerations of one’s views, convections and approaches on
the attainment of maximum results in the teaching-learning process. Teaching styles are
personal attributes of the teacher. They vary from one teacher to another. Teaching styles
may be classified as visual, auditory, group, kinesthetic, individual and tactile teaching
style. (1) Visual teaching style. The teacher presents the lesson through pictures, sketches,
diagrams, graphs or other related illustrations; (2) Auditory teaching style. The teacher
lectures or gives oral explanations most of the time; (3) Tactile teaching style. The
teacher adopts “hands on” activities; (4) Kinesthetic teaching style. The teacher engages
the students in physical movements as they learn the subject; (5) Group teaching style.
The teacher adopts group interaction and group discussion techniques in the teaching
lesson; and (6) Individual teaching style. The teacher requires the individual recitations,
Javis (2002) views teaching as both art and a science. In doing so, one can
approach with no limit on the combinations. Three main styles of teaching are
propounded; didactic, socratic and facilitative. (1) The didactic approach of teaching
Ketteridge & Marshall (2003) reminds us that although the lecture remains a major
method of teaching in child and continuing education, and is still recognized” as a useful
teaching tool” as it can provide a framework of ideas and theories but it needs to be
complemented by interaction and child-oriented strategies due to attention span and lack
and strong opposes didacticism. Brownhill (2002) illustrates how teachers can use either
independently and become critical thinkers; and (3) The facilitative approach of teaching
teases out previous learning and help pupils ‘make sense’ of experiences in relation to
On Pupils Achievement
Science is the study of the physical and natural world and phenomena, especially
by using systematic observation and experiment. Often, pupils find the subject difficult
because of the nature of the subject. Teaching must not only be concerned with the
delivery of information but also to consider the determinants of pupils’ success and
The achievement of pupils has been one of the important goals of the educative
process. This can be measured in terms of the extent of the academic achievement of
pupils. This shows whether the teachers’ and administrators in a school as a whole is
effective and efficient. Examining the academic achievement of pupils is a good indicator
for determining the quality of teaching. However, despite the mandate of educational
system for elementary academic as an indication of quality education, our basic education
institutions are targets of criticism. The roles of elementary and secondary teachers today
Supersticioso (2009) Achievement refers to the quality of pupils’ work which can
competencies and skills that pupils developed after regular classroom interactions and
discussions." She deftly marries analysis of university and teacher research findings with
rich examples of actual transcripts of pupils and teachers talking to reveal patterns in the
conversations. Cazden suggests that how pupils talk to each other connects directly with
According to Brooks, M. (1993) many educators believe that the best way to learn
is by having pupils construct their own knowledge instead of having someone construct it
for them. This belief is explained by the Constructivist Learning Theory. This theory
states that learning is an active process of creating meaning from different experiences. In
other words, pupils will learn best by trying to make sense of something on their own
with the teacher as a guide to help them along the way. Edward Thorndike (1990) support
this idea of active learning, a theory that proposes letting children learn themselves,
individuals as they respond to their environment. She also wrote that responses may vary
across environment settings (Keogh 1977). Cognitive learning styles influence one's
control over the learning process and are reflected in teaching and learning strategies
employ by pupils and educators. Cognitive learning styles influence the strategic use of
learning strategies in order to acquire and retain information and develop academic skills
(Collier & Hoover, 1987). As Slife, Weiss, and Bell (1985) note, pupils who are
successful learners spontaneously use cognitive learning strategies when learning new
Johnsons (1988) explain that there are three basic ways pupils can interact with
each other as they learn. They can compete to see who is "best"; they can
work individualistically on their own toward a goal without paying attention to other
pupils; or they can work cooperatively with a vested interest in each other's learning as
well as their own. Of the three interaction patterns, competition is presently the most
dominant. The research indicates that a vast majority of pupils in the Philippines view
school as a competitive enterprise where you try to do better than the other students. This
competitive expectation is already fairly widespread when pupils enter school and grows
The reviewed foreign and local studies on the determinants of academic success
widened the researcher’s insights on the aforementioned variables to the learning and
interest in Science. Both foreign and local researchers are dominant to the finding that
From the literatures reviewed, the non-uniformity of the findings amidst positive
contentions of many authors, the benefits from teaching styles like fostering academic
achievement, lowering drop-out rate, and engaging pupils in the class encouraged the
researcher to look into the relationship of teachers’ teaching styles and pupils’
Chapter 3
Methodology
This chapter presents the research design and methodology which include the (1)
research locale; (2) the respondents; (3) sampling procedure; (4) the research instrument;
(5) the data gathering procedure; (6) the administration of the instrument scoring
This study used correlation method of research to test the relationship of teachers’
teaching styles with the pupils’ academic achievement test in Science. The design
allowed the researcher to identify the teachers’ teaching styles as well as ascertain the
Slovins’s formula was employed in the study. Proportionate allocation was used to obtain
This study will be conducted in the Division of Iligan City, Province of Lanao del
Norte, Region X for the School Year 2011-2012. There are thirteen (13) Districts under
the care and monitoring of the Department of Education. All of these schools could be
reach by jeep and habal-habal. There are 118 Science teachers in the seven 7 districts
who had been teaching Science classes in Grade IV, V and VI.
The Science teachers in the Division of Iligan City are exposed to different
Science enrichment activities like the (1) Science caravans like annual nature-educational
trips and camping’s; (2) in-service trainings which are conducted twice every year; and
(3) special workshops with new instructional materials like the computer based
instructional resources. They participate in the year around activities mandated by the
Department of Education that are geared towards the acquisition of knowledge and skills
among pupils. Echo seminars are conducted during school base trainings as starter
seminar or midyear training, while the pupils are on semestral break. The schools are
required to submit their school program annually as a way of monitoring the loads given
Districts and 26 elementary schools in City Central, North 1, North 2, Northeast 1-A,
East 1, South 1-A and South 1-B Districts. Figure 2 is an educational facilities map of
Iligan City showing the expanse of its territory and the distribution of public elementary
Figure 2. Map of the City of Iligan Showing the Schools. Customized by the researcher
to show the 26 sample schools from the seven districts of the Division of Iligan City.
The Subjects
The subjects of the study are the intermediate Science teachers from the seven (7)
Districts in the Division of Iligan City. They are handling Science and Technology IV, V,
and VI subject. Their teaching styles are assessed by the grade IV, V and VI pupils. The
The grade IV, V and VI pupils whose Science academic achievement is measure
are also subjects of the study. The subject-respondents of the study are the grade IV, V
Table 1
The instrument of this study is the Grasha’s (1996) Teaching Style Inventory is
modified and use as a gathering tool for this study. The Science Academic Achievement
teachers to assess their personal teaching style. It is modified so that pupils can easily
assess their teachers’ teaching styles. It is modified into a 5-point Likert scale and in
simpler terms for pupils to easily describe their Science teacher using the following scale:
Agree and 5- Strongly Agree. The pupils just mark on the column corresponding to their
The Teaching Style Inventory was tried out to thirty (40) teachers of Lanao del
Norte. The said teachers are not included in the sample schools to avoid maturation. The
result of the try out revealed that the Teaching Style Inventory had a reliability of 0.883
(see Appendix ) based on the Cronbach Alpha coefficient. The minimum reliability value
is 0.7. After the reliability test, twenty (20) items are discarded and thirty (40) items are
retained based on the corrected item-total correlation. It implies that the Teaching Style
Inventory has internal consistency and appropriateness which measures the intent of the
The Teaching Style Inventory has three (3) categories namely: Autocratic,
Permissive, and Democratic. There were fourteen (14) items under Autocratic, twelve
State University, City of Malaybalay will be secured. The researcher proceeds to the
the instrument. With prior permission from the administration of the seven (7) Districts,
The researcher personally administers the inventory to see to it that all the items
of the inventory will be answered. Also, to ensure that all the inventories are retrieve the
The respondents are made to understand that the purpose of the study and the
importance of their honest not only to them but also to the organization, the Department
of Education in particular. Likewise, the respondents will be assured that their answers
will be treated with strict confidentiality and their answers were use for purposes of the
study.
The instrument use in the study was tried out to selected respondents who were
teachers assigned in the different districts of Lanao del Norte. The try out is conduct to
find out the acceptability and understandability of the aspects and their corresponding
A letter of request to try out the questionnaire is prepared stating the purpose of
the try out. This letter is address to the principal for their approval. The researcher
identifies all teachers not handling Science subject. A covering letter is prepared stating
the purpose of the try out. The researcher personally performs the try out. They
Rating assigned by the respondent to each item were measured in the space similar to the
below.
The ratings in each column are added. The Sum of the ratings in placed in the
corresponding space below each column. The Sum is divided by the number of items in
each column to obtain the average numerical rating assigned in the item with each
teaching style. The average ratings to the nearest decimal point are then written in the
space corresponding to the teaching styles. Score are range as Low, Moderate, and High
based on the test scores of each style with the scoring key guide.
For the interpretation of Low, Moderate and High Scores, the following limits are
considered.
Academic achievement test in Science was adopted from the Division Periodical
Test for School Year 2008-2009. Only thirty (30) items were selected from a set of
questions to cover first and second grading lessons only. It was multiple choice type of
test with four choices for each number marked A,B,C, and D. The score were defined by
The test was validated by experts as to content accuracy, clarity and readability.
The experts are composed of a Science teacher in the public schools, a professor in
Science teaching and a college professor in Education. The experts affirmed that the test
was compatible with the content and topics in Science. The test items and directions were
clear. The language used was readable and suited to the reading ability level of the target
respondents.
For problem one and two, the mean, the standard deviation, rank and
qualitative description will be used. For problem no.3 t-test or Pearson R will be
utilized or used.