Professional Documents
Culture Documents
anarnalawoffice
6 years ago
Republic of the Philippines
Makati City
WHEREAS, the Commission promulgated Memorandum Circular No. 91-002 establishing the
procedure in the investigation and hearing of administrative complaints before the PLEB against
uniformed members of the PNP;
WHEREAS, on March 6, 1998 Republic Act Numbered 8551 otherwise known as the “PNP
Reform and Reorganization Act of 1998” took effect amending, among others, Section 43 of R.A.
6975 in order to further strengthen the PLEB;
WHEREAS, there is a need to revise the existing rules of procedure embodied in Memorandum
Circular No. 91-002 in conformity with the amendments brought about by R.A. 8551.
RULE 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Definition of Terms. – The relevant terms as used in these Rules shall be
understood to mean as follows:
a) Administrative due process – the right of a party interested or affected to notice and hearing to
enable him to present his side and submit evidence in support thereof. In essence, due process
pertains to the opportunity of the party impleaded to be heard.
c) Answer – a responsive pleading containing the respondent’s negative and affirmative defenses.
d) Breach of Internal Discipline – any offense committed by a uniformed member of the PNP
involving and affecting order and discipline within the police organization.
e) Citizen’s Complaint – a formal charge initiated by a natural or juridical person of his/its duly
authorized representative or guardian on account of an injury, damage or disturbance sustained as
a result of an irregular or illegal act or omission of a member of the PNP.
h) Complaint – a written and sworn statement regarding a wrong, grievance or injury sustained by
a person.
i) Complainant – one who has initiated a complaint or charge against another either as private
individual or an officer who, by reason of his office or position, is required or authorized to
institute or file an administrative complaint.
j) Decision – a written disposition of a case personally and directly prepared and signed by the
members of the PLEB stating clearly the findings of facts and the law applicable thereto. It shall
also include a finding of exoneration or culpability of the respondent with the corresponding
penalty in case of the latter.
l) Exoneration – the finding made by the PLEB that respondent is not culpable of the charge.
m) Findings of fact(s) – the determination by the PLEB of an issue of fact after an evaluation of
the evidence submitted in the case.
n) Forum Shopping – the practice of filing several complaints arising from one and the same cause
of action and involving the same parties with the different disciplinary authorities.
o) Habituality – is a circumstance where the offender has been previously punished for an
administrative offense to which the law attaches an equal or greater penalty or for two or more
administrative offenses to which it attaches a lighter penalty.
q) Material Evidence – is that evidence which is relevant and goes to the substantial matter in
dispute, or has a legitimate and effective influence or bearing on the decision in the case.
r) Newly Discovered Evidence – that evidence which could not have been discovered and
produced during the hearing of the case despite due diligence, and if presented, would probably
alter the decision.
s) Quorum – it refers to the number necessary to do business, which in this case, is the presence of
the majority of the PLEB members.
u) Reglementary Period – the period required by law to perform a specific act. In the computation
of the period of time, the first day shall be excluded and the last day included unless it be a
Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday, in which case the period shall run until the end of the next
day which is neither a Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday.
v) Relevant Evidence – having any value in reason as tending to prove any matter provable (sic) in
an action. Evidence is relevant when it tends to prove or disprove the issue or issues outlined in
the pleading of the parties.
x) Subpoena – a process directed to a person requiring him to attend and to testify at the hearing
before the PLEB.
y) Subpoena Duces Tecum – a process that requires a person to bring with him any book,
document, or thing under his control at the scheduled hearing before the PLEB.
bb) Summons – a written order informing the respondent that he is charged of an offense and
directing him to file his answer and other responsive pleadings.
Sec. 2. Nature of Proceedings. – The hearing is summary in nature and shall not be governed
strictly by the technical rules of procedure. However, the proceedings must be consistent with the
principles of administrative due process.
Sec. 3. Solemnity of Proceedings. – The hearing shall be conducted with solemnity. The chairman
and members shall comport themselves with proper decorum, impartiality and dignity befitting
their office. They shall always bear in mind that the PLEB’s duty is to determine the facts of the
case as presented by the party litigants, judiciously evaluate the evidence adduced and, thereafter,
arrive at a fair and just decision.
Sec. 4. Effect of the Criminal Case to Administrative Action – A criminal case is separate and
distinct from the administrative case. Accordingly, an acquittal from or dismissal of the criminal
case shall not affect the administrative case unless such acquittal or dismissal arose from a
declaration by the Court that the accused did not commit the crime.
RULE II
Sec. 2. Functions, Powers and Duties. – The PLEB shall have the power to hear and adjudicate all
citizen’s complaints formally filed with, or referred to it, against any uniformed member of the
PNP, and, if warranted, impose the corresponding penalty.
In the exercise of its functions, the PLEB, acting through its chairman, is empowered to administer
oaths, summon witnesses, require the production of documents, records, books, or other things by
a subpoena duces tecum and issue other processes as may be necessary.
b) Any punong-barangay of the city or municipality concerned chosen by the Liga ng mga
Barangay; and
c) Three (3) other members who are removable only for cause to be chosen by the local peace and
order council from among the respected members of the community known for their probity and
integrity, one (1) of whom must be a woman and another, a member of the Bar, or in the absence
thereof, a college graduate, or, the principal of the central elementary school in the locality.
The Chairman of the PLEB shall be elected from among its members.
Membership in the PLEB constitutes a public office, as such a public official or employee is
disqualified for appointment or designation as member thereof unless allowed by law or by the
primary functions of his office.
Applying the provisions of Article 152 Chapter IV, Title III, Book II of the Revised Penal Code,
the members of the PLEB are considered persons in authority.
Sec. 4. Executive Order Constituting the PLEB. – Upon enactment of a resolution by the
Sangguniang Panlungsod/Bayan formally organizing the members of the PLEB, a copy thereof
shall immediately be submitted to the City/Municipal Mayor who shall, within five (5) days from
receipt thereof, issue the appropriate executive order adopting the resolution of the Sanggunian
concerned.
Sec. 5. Oath of Office. – Before assuming the duties of their office, the chairman and members of
the PLEB shall take the oath or affirmation before an administering officer, a copy of which shall
be filed with the office of the National Police Commission in the region where the PLEB is
situated. The oath shall read:
Sec. 6. Term of Office. – The term of office of the members of the PLEB shall be for a period of
three (3) years from assumption of office. Such member shall hold office until his/her successor
shall have been chosen and qualified.
The tenure of office of a PLEB member who has been designated as such by virtue of his election
to the Sangguniang Panlungsod/Bayan or his membership with the Association of Barangay
Captains ends upon the expiration of his term of office as Sangguniang Panlungsod/Bayan
member or as Barangay Chairman. If reelected, and subsequently redesignated to the PLEB, he
must take a new oath of office.
Sec. 7. Compensation. – Membership in the PLEB is a civic duty. However, PLEB members shall
be paid per diem and shall be provided with life insurance coverage as may be determined by the
sangguniang panlungsod/bayan from the city or municipal funds. The Department of the Interior
and Local Government (DILG) shall provide for the per diem and insurance coverage of PLEB
members in certain low-income municipalities.
Sec. 8. Budget Allocation. – The annual budget of the Local Government Units (LGUs) shall
include an item and the corresponding appropriation for the maintenance and operation of their
local PLEB(s).
Sec. 9. Quorum. – The presence of the majority of all the PLEB members shall constitute a
quorum.
If for any reason, the chairman is unable to attend a meeting or is disqualified from participating
therein, the members shall elect from themselves a temporary chairman to perform the duties
appurtenant thereto.
When a PLEB member, after sufficient notice, fails or refuses to attend the hearings and/or
deliberations thereof without any valid and justifiable reason and the Board could not proceed for
lack of quorum, the Chairman or the designated presiding officer may request the Sangguniang
Panlungsod/Bayan or the Liga ng mga Barangay or the City/Municipal Peace and Order Council
concerned to designate a temporary representative therein in order to attain the required quorum;
Provided That, such temporary representative shall act as such only for the specific case.
Sec. 10. Disqualification by Reason of Affinity or Consanguinity. – Any member of the PLEB
who is related to the complainant or respondent by affinity or consanguinity within the fourth civil
degree shall be disqualified from participating in the proceeding and the case shall be tried by the
remaining members: Provided, That there is sufficient number to constitute a quorum. In the
event that the PLEB could not proceed with the hearing for lack of quorum, the Peace and Order
Council, or the sangguniang panlungsod/bayan, or the Liga ng mga Barangay of the
city/municipality concerned shall appoint temporary member/s to hear and decide the specific case
only.
RULE III
Section 1. Venue. – The PLEB shall be the central receiving entity for any citizen’s
complaint against a uniformed member of the PNP. As such, every citizen’s complaint, regardless
of the imposable penalty for the offense alleged, shall be filed with the PLEB of the
city/municipality or legislative district where the offense was allegedly committed.
Upon receipt and docketing of the complaint, the PLEB shall immediately determine whether the
offense alleged therein is grave, less grave or minor. If the PLEB finds that the offense alleged is
minor, it shall refer the complaint to the Chief of Police or Mayor, as the case may be, of the city
or municipality where the PNP member is assigned within three (3) days upon the filing thereof.
Should the PLEB find that the offense alleged is grave or less grave, it shall take cognizance of the
case and accordingly serve summons upon the respondent within three (3) days from receipt of the
complaint.
If the city or municipality where the offense was committed has no PLEB, the citizen’s complaint
shall be filed with the regional or provincial office of the Commission nearest the residence of the
complainant.
Complaints involving breach of internal discipline as defined in Section 1(d) Rule 1 of these Rules
shall be filed with the proper PNP disciplinary authority pursuant to Section 41(b) of R.A. No.
6975 as amended.
Sec. 2. Jurisdiction over Citizen’s Complaint. – The following shall have jurisdiction over citizen’s
complaint:
c) People’s Law Enforcement Board, where the offense charged is punishable by withholding of
privileges, restriction to specified limits, suspension or forfeiture of salary, or any combination
thereof, for a period not exceeding thirty (30) days; or dismissal, forced resignation or demotion of
rank.
The jurisdiction of the PLEB to hear and decide citizen’s complaint pertains to complaints of
private individuals against PNP men and not by PNP men against their co-members or officers in a
professional capacity, except, when they filed such a complaint in their private capacity and not as
members of the PNP.
Sec. 3. Principle of Exclusivity. – A complaint or a charge filed against a PNP member shall be
heard and decided exclusively by the disciplinary authority who first acquired original jurisdiction
over the case, notwithstanding the existence of concurrent jurisdiction as regards the offense:
Provided, That offenses which carry higher penalties referred to a disciplinary authority shall be
forwarded to the appropriate authority which has jurisdiction over the offense.
Sec. 4. When Respondent is a Presidential Appointee. – All uniformed police officers, who are
presidential appointees, may be suspended or removed from office only for cause and by order of
the President. Administrative cases involving such officers shall be investigated by the PLEB in
accordance with the procedure prescribed under these Rules after prior clearance from the
President, through the Executive Secretary, pursuant to Presidential Memorandum Order No. 41
dated November 7, 2001. The Report of Investigation of the PLEB shall be submitted to the
Office of the President, through the Commission, for disposition.
RULE IV
PROCEDURE
Said complaint shall be filed in at least three (3) copies with the Office of the PLEB of the
city/municipality where the offense was committed.
a) That he/she has not filed or commenced any other action or proceeding involving the same in
other disciplinary forum;
b) That to the best of his/her knowledge, no such action or proceeding is pending in other police
administrative disciplinary authority;
c) That if there is any such action or proceeding which is either pending or may have been
terminated, he/she must state the status thereof; and
d) That if he/she should thereafter learn that a similar action or proceeding has been filed or is
pending before any other police disciplinary authority, he/she undertakes to report such fact within
five (5) days therefrom to the disciplinary authority wherein the original complaint or pleading
and sworn certification contemplated herein have been filed.
Sec. 4. Notice. – Within three (3) days upon receipt of the complaint, the PLEB shall furnish
a copy thereof to the respondent, directing him/her to submit his/her answer thereto within five (5)
days from receipt thereof, together with whatever documentary evidence he/she may have in
support of the defense.
Sec. 5. Answer. – The answer shall be in writing, under oath and must contain material facts,
which may either be a specific denial or affirmation of the allegations in the complaint. It shall be
accompanied by documentary or other evidence, if there be any, in support of the defense, copy
furnished the complainant. It shall also contain a list of witnesses and their individual addresses.
The answer shall be filed in at least three (3) copies either personally or by registered mail.
The answer is deemed filed on the date and hour of receipt stamped by the post office on the
envelope, if filed by registered mail. Said envelope shall be kept and made an integral part of the
records of the case.
No motion to dismiss, motion for bill of particulars or any other interlocutory motion shall
be allowed hence, filing of the same shall not interrupt the running of the reglementary period for
filing an answer.
Sec. 6. Effect of Failure / Refusal To File Answer. – Failure of the respondent to file an
answer within the reglementary period shall be considered as a general denial of the charges.
Sec. 7. Effect of Admission By Respondent. – When the respondent in his answer admits his
culpability to the charge, the PLEB shall, nonetheless, proceed with the hearing in order to
determine the degree of his responsibility, and the appropriate penalty to be imposed.
Sec. 8. Pre-Hearing Conference. – Within five (5) days from receipt of the answer, the PLEB
shall summon the parties to a pre-hearing conference for the purpose of: a) defining and
simplifying the issues of the case; b) entering into admissions and/or stipulation of facts; c)
limiting the number of witnesses to be presented; d) scheduling the dates of hearing; and e)
threshing out all other matters relevant to the case.
The conference shall be completed in one (1) day and the proceedings thereof shall be duly
recorded and signed by the parties and/or counsels. Where the parties are represented by counsel,
the latter shall be made to sign and/or file a certificate of readiness to appear at the scheduled
hearings. In said certification, the date of hearing agreed upon by both counsels shall be strictly
followed to avoid unnecessary delay in the proceeding.
Sec. 9. Hearing Proper. – Within five (5) days from the termination of the conference, the
PLEB shall proceed with the formal hearing of the case.
The parties and their witnesses shall be duly notified of the scheduled hearing at least three
(3) days before the date thereof, specifying the date, time, and place of hearing.
At the start of the hearing, the Chairman of the PLEB shall ask for the appearance of the
parties and inquire if they are ready to proceed with the presentation of their evidence.
Sec. 10. Order of Hearing. – The order of the hearing before the PLEB shall be as follows:
a) The complainant shall adduce evidence with proper identification and marking thereof of his
exhibits;
b) The respondent shall then present evidence in support of his defense with proper identification
and marking thereof of his exhibits;
c) The proceedings being summary in nature, direct examination of witnesses shall be dispensed
with and the sworn statements/affidavits of witnesses, after proper identification and affirmation
on the truth of the contents thereof, shall take the place of their oral testimony;
d) Clarificatory examination, if requested by either party, shall be confined strictly to material and
relevant matters and, insofar, as may be compatible with the ends of justice, shall be limited to not
more than fifteen (15) minutes. Prolonged argumentation and other dilatory proceedings shall not
be entertained.
Sec. 11. Proceedings In the Absence of Counsel. – If the respondent at the start of the
proceedings appears without any counsel, the chairman of the PLEB shall inform him/her of
his/her right to avail of one if he/she desires. Respondent may, however, waive this right
expressly or impliedly. However, the hearing shall proceed as scheduled in spite of absence of one
or both counsel.
In such cases, it shall be incumbent upon the PLEB to propound questions, interrogate
witnesses and examine material and relevant evidence which are necessary in the determination of
the issues and in arriving at a just and fair conclusion.
Regardless of the ground invoked, not more than two (2) postponements shall be granted.
Accordingly, the next scheduled hearing shall proceed as scheduled.
Sec. 13. Request for Preventive Suspension. – The PLEB may ask any authorized superior
to place under preventive suspension a subordinate police officer who is the subject of a
complaint. In the following cases the superior officer shall not deny a request for preventive
suspension:
a) when the respondent refuses to heed the PLEB’s summons or subpoena;
b) when the PNP personnel has been charged with offenses involving bodily harm or grave
threats;
The period of preventive suspension shall not exceed ninety (90) days. Upon the expiration
thereof, the suspended respondent PNP member shall be automatically reinstated without
prejudice to the continuation of the proceedings against him.
While under preventive suspension, respondent shall not receive his salary and other
benefits. However, in case of exoneration, respondent shall be reinstated with full payment of
back salaries and such emoluments, which he failed to receive during such suspension.
The preventive suspension herein imposed shall not form part of the penalty of suspension
should the respondent be found culpable, except when it is so stated in the decision of the PLEB.
In cases where the culpability of the respondent can be established by evidence other than
the testimony of the complainant, non-appearance of the latter shall not be a ground to terminate
the proceedings. The PLEB shall endeavor to continue with the hearing and secure the attendance
of other vital witnesses to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
Sec. 16. Effect of Failure or Refusal of Respondent to Appear. – If the respondent, despite
due notice, fails or refuses to appear during the scheduled hearings, he/she is deemed to have
waived his/her right to be present and to submit evidence in his/her favor and the said scheduled
hearing shall proceed ex-parte.
Sec. 18. Effect of Retirement. – The optional or compulsory retirement of the respondent
shall not affect the pendency of his administrative case and the award of the retirement benefits
due him shall be subject to its final adjudication.
Sec. 19. Effect of Death. – Death of the respondent during the pendency of the case shall
terminate the administrative proceedings and has the effect of exoneration.
Upon presentation of a certified true copy of the death certificate, a resolution dismissing the
case shall be issued by the proper disciplinary authority hearing the case.
Sec. 20. Stenographic Records of Proceedings. – The testimony of each witness and the
manifestation of the Chairman and members of the PLEB, the parties and counsel, during the
hearing shall be taken in shorthand or stenotype, if there is a stenographer. Clerks and
stenographers employed to record the proceedings shall, before discharging their duties, be
required to take an oath that they shall truly report and faithfully record all matters taken thereat
and, will keep the deliberation of the case with strictest secrecy and confidence.
A transcript of the records made and certified to as correct by the official stenographer or
stenotypist shall be a prima facie correct statement of the proceedings.
Sec. 21. Where Services of Stenographer Not Available. – Where the services of
stenographer is not available, a substantial account of the proceedings duly certified to as correct
by the Chairman of the PLEB shall suffice.
Sec. 22. Nature and Contents of the Decision. – Decision, as used in these rules, is the
written findings of fact by the PLEB as established during the hearing, the conclusions of law
upon which they are based, and the disposition thereof, personally and directly prepared and
signed by all the members who participated in the proceedings/deliberations.
It shall include the name of the respondent, his unit or office and rank, and the offense to
which he was exonerated or found liable, including the appropriate penalty to be imposed.
The Board shall determine by a majority vote of its members, whether or not the respondent
officer or member of the PNP is culpable of the charge.
Sec. 23. Respondent Found Liable For an Offense Different and Distinct From That to
Which He Was Charged. – A respondent PNP member may be found culpable of an offense
different from that he was charged: Provided, That the offense to which he was found liable was
alleged or included in the recital of the complaint and the respondent has been given the
opportunity to answer.
Sec. 24. Period to Render Decision. – The PLEB shall decide the case within sixty (60) days
after its submission for decision.
Sec. 25. Finality of Decision. – (A) The decision of the PLEB exonerating or reprimanding
the respondent in an administrative case is final and executory upon receipt of a copy thereof by
the parties, hence unappealable. (B) Where the decision of the PLEB involves the penalty of
withholding of privileges, restriction, suspension, forfeiture of salary or fine, demotion, or forced
resignation, the same shall become final and executory only after the lapse of ten (10) days from
the receipt of a copy thereof by the respondent unless the latter files a motion for reconsideration
or appeal within said period in which case, the resolution on the motion or appeal shall become
final and executory only after the lapse of ten (10) days from receipt of a copy of said resolution
by the respondent (C) However, where the decision of the PLEB involves the penalty of dismissal,
the same shall be immediately executory upon receipt of a copy thereof by the respondent as
furnished to him by his/her immediate superior officer. The filing of a motion for reconsideration
or appeal as the case may be, within the reglementary period of ten (10) days shall not suspend the
implementation thereof.
Sec. 26. Application of the Principle of Res Judicata/Bar by Prior Judgment. – For a prior
judgment in an administrative case to constitute a bar to a subsequent administrative action, the
following requisites must concur:
b) The Disciplinary Authority rendering the same must have jurisdiction over the subject matter
and over the parties;
d) There must be between the two (2) cases, identity of parties, identity of subject matter and
identity of cause of action.
Sec. 27. Motion for Reconsideration. – The respondent may file a motion for reconsideration
from the decision rendered by the PLEB within ten (10) days from receipt of a copy of the
decision based on the following grounds:
1) Newly discovered evidence which, if presented, would materially affect the decision rendered;
or
2) Errors of law or irregularities have been committed prejudicial to the substantial rights and
interest of the movant.
Only one (1) motion for reconsideration shall be allowed and the same shall be considered
and decided by the PLEB within fifteen (15) days from receipt thereof.
Sec. 28. Service of Decision. – Copies of the decisions, orders and resolutions issued by the
PLEB shall be served either personally or by registered mail. Whenever possible service of
decisions and other papers shall be done personally.
Sec. 29. Maintenance of Docket Books. – The PLEB shall keep a docket book for
administrative complaints in which all complaints shall be properly entered adn given their
corresponding number in the order of their receipt. The docket book shall contain the following
records:
f) Case referral where the offense charged is not cognizable by the PLEB;
m) Date the decision was promulgated indicating whether respondent was exonerated, or, if found
culpable, the penalty imposed;
o) Date when motion for reconsideration/appeal was filed if any, and its status.
Sec. 30. Quarterly Report. – At the end of every quarter the PLEB is required to submit a
report to the regional office of the Commission indicating therein the province, municipality or
city to which it belongs with the following data/information:
RULE V
APPEAL
Section 1. Appeal. – In cases where the decision of the PLEB imposes a penalty of demotion
in rank, forced resignation or dismissal from the service, the respondent may file, with the
deciding authority, and serving upon the adverse party, a notice of appeal, within ten (10) days
from receipt of a copy of the decision.
Likewise, the appellant is required to submit the memorandum of appeal in three (3) copies
with the Regional Appellate Board (RAB) concerned within ten (10) days from filing of notice of
appeal.
In addition, the respondent shall submit to the RAB concerned the proof of service of a copy
of the notice of appeal together with the appeal memorandum to the PLEB that rendered the
decision being appealed.
Within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the notice of appeal, the PLEB concerned shall
forward the records of the case, which shall be systematically and chronologically arranged, paged
and securely bound to prevent loss, with its comment, to the RAB. The transmittal of the records
of the case to the RAB is a ministerial responsibility of the PLEB. Accordingly, failure of the
PLEB to forward the same to the RAB concerned will be a ground for administrative disciplinary
action.
Sec. 2. Period to Act on Appeal. – The Regional Appellate Board shall decide the appeal
within the period of sixty (60) days from receipt of the complete records of the case.
Sec. 3. Effect of Failure to Decide Appeal. – Failure of the Regional Appellate Board to
decide the appeal within sixty (60) days from receipt of the case records shall render the decision
of the PLEB final and executory without prejudice, however, to the filing of an appeal to the
Secretary of the Department of the Interior and Local Government.
RULE VI
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES
Section 1. Administrative Offenses. – The following are the offenses for which a member
of the PNP may be charged administratively:
a. Neglect of duty
c. Misconduct
d. Incompetency
e. Oppression
f. Dishonesty
h. Violation of Law
d. Incompetence – is the manifest lack of adequate ability and fitness for the satisfactory
performance of police duties. This has reference to any physical, moral or intellectual quality the
lack of which substantially incapacitates one to perform the duties of a peace officer.
RULE VII
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
Section 1. Imposable Penalties. – The following are the penalties that may be imposed by
the PLEB in police administrative cases:
a. Withholding of privileges
c. Suspension
e. Demotion
f. Forced Resignation
g. Dismissal
Should the penalty of demotion be imposed it shall not exceed one rank lower.
a. physical illness
b. good faith
d. analogous circumstances
e. habituality
f. offense is committed during office hours and/or within the premises of the working office or
building
Sec. 4. Guidelines in the Application of Penalties. – The imposition of the penalty shall be
made in accordance with the manner herein below provided:
a. Like penalties shall be imposed for like offenses and only one penalty shall be imposed for each
case. “Each case” means one administrative case which may involve one or more charges or
counts.
b. The minimum of the penalty shall be imposed where only mitigating and no aggravating
circumstances are present.
c. The medium of the penalty shall be imposed where no mitigating and aggravating
circumstances are present.
d. The maximum of the penalty shall be imposed where only aggravating and no mitigating
circumstances are present.
e. Where aggravating and mitigating circumstances are present, rule (b) shall be applied where
there are more mitigating circumstances present; rule (c) shall be applied where the circumstances
equally off-set each other; rule (d) shall be applied when there are more aggravating
circumstances.
f. If the respondent is found guilty of two (2) or more charges or counts, the penalty to be imposed
should be that corresponding to the most serious charge or count and the rest shall be considered
as aggravating circumstances.
Sec. 6. Administrative Disability Inherent in Certain Penalties. – The following are the
administrative disabilites inherent in certain penalties:
a. The penalty of dismissal, which results in the separation of the respondent from the
service, shall carry with it that of cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of leave credits and
retirement benefits, and the disqualification for re-employment in the government service;
c. The penalty of forfeiture of salary, which consists of an amount not exceeding one (1)
month salary, shall carry with it that of disqualification for promotion corresponding to the penalty
imposed.
RULE VIII
FINAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Repealing Clause. – All issuances contrary to or inconsistent with this Circular
are hereby amended or repealed accordingly.
Sec. 2. Separability Clause. – If any portion or provision of these Rules is declared illegal,
the same shall not affect the validity and effectivity of the other provisions not affected thereby.
Sec. 3. Penalty Clause. – Any violation of these Rules shall be a ground for administrative
disciplinary action in accordance with existing laws and regulations.
Sec. 4. Effectivity. – This Circular shall take effect fifteen (15) days from date of publication
in a newspaper of general circulation; and a copy of the same filed with the University of the
Philippines Law Center in consonance with Executive Order Numbered 292, otherwise known as
the Administrative Code of 1987.
Chairperson
ROGELIO A. PUREZA
Commissioner
Commissioner
LINDA L. MALENAB-HORNILLA
Commissioner
Commissioner
Attested by:
ROSALINDA CRUZ
Blog at WordPress.com.
Back to top