You are on page 1of 5

Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical Students

Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical
Students
Nidhi Nagori*, Ashok Vala**, Bharat Panchal***, Imran Ratnani*, Kinjal Vasava*
*Resident Doctor, **Associate Professor, ***Professor, Department Of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar
Abstract: Objective: Internet addiction is characterized by excessive or poorly controlled preoccupations, urges or
behaviours regarding computer use and Internet access that lead to impairment or distress in individual’s
psychological state. This study was aimed to assess the frequency of internet addiction and its possible association
with anxiety severity and quality of life among medical students. Methods: This was an observational, cross sectional,
single-centred, self-assessable questionnaire based study administrated among 525 consenting medical students.
The participants were assessed by proforma containing demographic details,variables related with internet use,
questionnaires of IAT (Internet Addiction Test for Internet Use), BAI (Beck’s Anxiety Inventory) and WHOQOL-BREF
(World health organization quality of life assessment scale). Statistical data were analysed by Graph Pad InStat
version 3.06 using Chi–square test and Mann-Whitney test. Results: Frequency of problematic users among medical
students was 9.3 % with frequency of internet addiction 0.9%.Participants with problematic internet use were likely
to experience high severity of anxiety (p<0.0001) and poorer quality of life in psychological (p= 0.01) and
environmental domain (p=0.03). Conclusion: Participants with problematic internet use were more likely to
experience anxiety symptoms and poor quality of life and vice a versa. [Dr.Nidhi N NJIRM 2016; 7(5):9-13]
Key Words: Anxiety, Internet Addiction, Quality of Life
Author For Correspondence: Dr. Nidhi Nagori, C-303, Meghna Complex, Gandhi Kutir, U.M. Road, Surat -395017
(Gujarat).E- E-Mail: nidhi.nagori12@gmail.com
Introduction: There has been an explosive growth in present in the preceding 6 months. She further
the use of internet not only in India but also divided Internet addiction into 5 subtypes depending
worldwide in the last decade. There were about 243 on the particular component of use to which it was
million active internet users in urban India in July directed addiction, namely: (1) cybersexual addiction;
20141 as compared to 149 million in 20132 and 45 (2) cyber-relational addiction; (3) net compulsions; (4)
million in 20083. The internet is used by some to information overload; and (5) computer addiction 6.
facilitate research, to seek information, for
interpersonal communication, and for business Another important researcher in this area is Mark
transactions. On the other hand, it can be used by Griffiths7 who suggested the following six basic
some to indulge in pornography, excessive gaming, components of Internet addiction. His components
chatting for long hours, and even gambling. There are based on the general criteria of DSM IV: 1.Salience
have been growing concerns worldwide for what has 2.Mood modification 3.Tolerance 4. Withdrawal
been labeled as “INTERNET ADDICTION” and this term symptoms 5.Conflict and 6.Relapse.
was first introduced by Dr. Ivan Goldberg4 in 1995 to
describe ‘pathological and compulsive use of Previous studies8 about Internet addiction have
internet’. investigated several associated psychological variables
such as shyness, loneliness, self-consciousness,
5
Kimberly Young , a well know researcher in this field, anxiety, depression, and interpersonal relations.
describes Internet addiction as follows: “Internet
addiction is defined as any online-related, compulsive One is at greater risk of Internet addiction if 9:
behaviour which interferes with normal living and •Suffer from anxiety as some may use the Internet to
causes severe stress on family, friends, loved ones, distract self from their worries and fears.
and one's work environment. Internet addiction has •Any other addictions :Many Internet addicts suffer
been called Internet dependency and Internet from other addictions, such as drugs, alcohol,
compulsivity. By any name, it is a compulsive gambling, and sex.
behaviour that completely dominates the addict's •Poor social support : Internet addicts often use social
life.” Young modified the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria networking sites, instant messaging, or online gaming
for pathological gambling to construct diagnostic as a safe way of establishing new relationships and
criteria for pathological Internet use, which she more confidently relating to others.
defined as 5 or more of 8 characteristic symptoms

NJIRM 2016; Vol. 7(5) September-October eISSN: 0975-9840 pISSN: 2230 - 9969 9
Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical Students
•An unhappy person :Some might be wondering among medical students and also to know about
where they fit in and the Internet could feel more corelation between Anxiety severity with severity of
comfortable than real-life friends. Internet Addiction among medical students and to
Internet addiction results in personal, family, compare above stated parameters among medical
academic, financial, and occupational problems that students with Internet Addiction and without Internet
are characteristic of other addictions. Individuals Addiction.
suffering from Internet addiction spend more time in
solitary seclusion, spend less time with real people in Methods: In the present study 525 students were
their lives, and are often viewed as socially awkward. enrolled from Medical College including MBBS
Arguments may result due to the volume of time students, interns and postgraduate students from
spent on-line. Those suffering from Internet addiction time period from October 2014 –March 2015 after
may attempt to conceal the amount of time spent on- prior approval from local ethics committee
line, which results in distrust and the disturbance of (Institutional Review Board / Human Ethics
quality in once stable relationships10. Committee ) for conducting the study.

Some suffering from Internet addiction may create Purpose of study was explained to all the participants
on-line personas or profiles where they are able to and written informed consent was taken from them.
alter their identities and pretend to be someone other They were given a proforma containing details of
than himself or herself. Those at highest risk for demographics (name, age, gender, weight, height),
creation of a secret life are those who suffer from designation, purpose of using the internet (by
low-self esteem feelings of inadequacy, and fear of choosing among the options like education,
disapproval. Such negative self-concepts lead to entertainment, news, gaming or social
clinical problems of depression and anxiety. networking),monthly total expenditure, money spent
Many persons who attempt to quit their Internet use per month on internet, place of access (home,
experience withdrawal including: anger, depression, cybercafé, or college ), the time of day when the
relief, mood swings, anxiety, fear, irritability, sadness, internet is accessed the most , the average duration of
loneliness, boredom, restlessness, procrastination, use per day, time spent on other extracurricular
and upset stomach. Being addicted to the Internet activities per day and addiction of any
can also cause physical discomfort or medical substance(tea/coffee/others). Presence or absence of
problems such as: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, dry eyes, past history and family history of psychiatric illness
backaches, severe headaches, eating irregularities, was also included in the proforma.
(such as skipping meals), failure to attend to personal
hygiene, and sleep disturbance11,12. The proforma further included the self-assessable
questionnaire which was based on following scales.
A number of studies have been conducted across the
world, especially among adolescents with respect to The Internet Addiction Test (IAT; Young, 1998)18which
internet addiction. In studies that focus on younger is a 20-item 5-point likert scale that measures the
people, prevalence of internet addiction estimates severity of self-reported compulsive use of the
range from 0.9 to 38%.13,14,15,16,17 internet. Total internet addiction scores were
calculated, with possible scores for the sum of 20
This study is a preliminary step toward understanding items ranging from 20 to 100.
the extent of internet addiction among college
students in India. By studying the association of According to Young's criteria, total IAT scores 20-49
internet usage and its effects on human behavior, we represent average users with complete control of
can formulate interventions like setting boundaries their internet use, scores 40-79 represent over-users
and detecting early warning signs of underlying with frequent problems caused by their internet use,
psychopathology at the earliest. and scores 80-100 represent internet addicts with
significant problems caused by their internet use.
The objectives of present study is to assess frequency 2) The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI),19 created by
of Internet Addiction and association of Anxiety Aaron T. Beck, MD, and colleagues, is a 21-item
severity and quality of life with Internet Addiction multiple-choice self-report inventory that measures

NJIRM 2016; Vol. 7(5) September-October eISSN: 0975-9840 pISSN: 2230 - 9969 10
Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical Students
the severity of an anxiety in adults and adolescents. Problematic internet users were using internet for
The values for each item are summed yielding an longer duration of years and spend more hours daily
overall or total score for all 21 symptoms that can using internet than normal users.
range between 0 and 63 points.The values for each
item are summed yielding an overall or total score for There was a statistically significant relationship
all 21 symptoms that can range between 0 and 63 between the total monthly expenditure and monthly
points. A total score of 0 - 7 is interpreted as a cost of internet services among the problematic
"Minimal" level of anxiety; 8 - 15 as "Mild"; 16 -25 as internet users which was of the higher cost compared
"Moderate", and; 26 - 63 as "Severe". to non-problematic internet users.
3) WHOQOL-BREF20is the short version of the
WHOQOL 100 . There was significant association between high speed
of internet and problematic internet use was seen in
It is a self-report questionnaire that contains 26 items our study, high speed helps in fast downloading and
of WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality easy accessibility so one may become more prone to
of Life) assessment scale for assessment of person’s internet addiction.
quality of life in physical health, psychological, social
relationship and environment domains. A higher score Participants with problematic internet use were likely
indicates a higher QOL. Qualitative data were to experience high severity of anxiety (p<0.0001).
expressed as percentages and quantitative data were Severity of anxiety is positively correlated with
expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The internet addiction (r2= 0.085, p<0.0001).
statistical analysis was done with Graph Pad. InStat
version 3.06 (San Diego, California, US). The participants with problematic internet use had a
poorer quality of life in psychological (p= 0.01) and
Proportions of participants were compared by using environmental domain (p=0.03) of WHOQOL-BREF as
Chi-square test while scores of IAT, BECK’S Anxiety compared to non- problematic group.
Inventory and WHOQOL-BREF was compared by using
Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Table 1 : Overall Analysis To Find Out Proportion Of
Dunn’s post-hoc multiple comparisons. A p value of < Study Subjects Falling In The Category Of Internet
0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical Addicts On The Basis Of Scoring System Adapted For
co-relation between internet addiction and above Study (N=525)
stated psychiatric variables were assessed by Scoring Pattern No. of Males Females Perce
spearman’s rank correlation. Interval Student (245) (280) ntage
* (525) (%)
Result: Participants were grouped into 2 groups; Non- <20 Less than 180 62 118 34.3
problematic use of internet (IAT score < 50 i.e. average %
average online users and less than that) and 20-49 Average 296 150 146 56.4
Problematic use of internet (IAT score ≥ 50 i.e user %
moderate internet users and internet addicts). 50-79 Moderate 44 30 14 8.4%
user /
Frequency of problematic users among students was Possible
9.3 % with frequency of internet addiction 0.9%.Males addict
were more likely to experience internet addiction 80- Addict 05 03 02 0.9%
than females. 100
*Scoring is based on Internet Addiction Test (IAT)
The main purpose of using the internet in medical
students were for social networking (81.5%) and for Discussion: Our study showed that 44 out of 525
education (81.3%) followed by entertainment (72.2%) participants (8.4%) were at risk with moderate use of
and then the other purposes. About 96.2 % of the internet and five out of 525 participants (0.9%) were
medical students were using mobile phones to access addicted users, so 49 out of 525 participants (9.3%)
the internet. were considered problematic internet users with
frequency of internet addiction 0.9%. In the studies

NJIRM 2016; Vol. 7(5) September-October eISSN: 0975-9840 pISSN: 2230 - 9969 11
Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical Students
conducted by Goel et al15and VenkataVenu Gopala in other studies was found between 3.5% -
RajuSrijampana et al16 , it was also found that the 17.2%17,21.It must be noted that comparing these
prevalence of internet addicts was 0.7% and 0.4% studies was a difficult task because of differences in
respectively among students which is consistent with study populations, applied tools, cut off points and
our own results.The prevalence of internet addiction differences in social and cultural contexts.
Table 2: Association Of Internet Addiction (Based On Table 3 : Association Of Severity Of Anxiety (BAI
IAT Scores) With Anxiety Severity (BAI Scores) And Scores) With Internet Addiction (IAT Scores) And
Quality Of Life (WHOQOL-BREF Score). Quality Of Life(WHOQOL-BREF Score).
Non Problematic BAI < 8 BAI ≥ 8
Problematic use of N = 313 N = 212 P value
use of Internet Internet p value IAT 24.37 ± 14.28 33.11 ± 17.40 p< 0.0001
IAT Score < 50 IAT Score ≥
N=476 50 WHOQOL-BREF
N=49 Physical health 56.02 ± 9.42 52.84 ± 10.32 p = 0.0025
BAI Score 6.45± 5.84 13.77±10.60 p<0.000
1 Psychological 62.67 ± 11.52 59.98 ± 11.74 p = 0.0088
WHOQOL-BREF
Physical health 54.98±9.65 52.33±10.60 p=0.08 Social 69.45 ± 14.42 63.63 ± 17.43 p < 0.0001
relationship
Psychological 61.99±11.44 57.65±13.21 p = 0.01 Environmental 72.54 ± 12.90 68.63 ± 13.30 p = 0.0025
Correlating the IAT score with BAI score in figure 1,
p < 0.05
Social 67.43±15.40 63.26±20.19 there is significant correlation between them (r2 =
relationship 0.085, p<0.0001).
p=0.03
Environmental 71.31±12.95 67.60±15.03
BAI SCORE

IAT SCORE

In consistent with earlier study16,Internet addiction the chances of internet addiction also increases and
was found more frequent among males in our study quality of life in all the domains of WHOQOL-BREF
also and the problematic users were using internet for decreases.
prime purpose of social networking and
entertainment. In our study, we found that there was Conclusion: Participants with problematic internet use
significant association between internet addiction and are more likely to experience anxiety symptoms and
anxiety symptoms and a positive co-relation was also quality of life and vice a versa. As the severity of
seen between them. This finding is in consistent with anxiety increases, the chances of internet addiction
finding in other study22. The participants with also increases and quality of life in all the domains of
problematic internet use had a poorer quality of life in WHOQOL-BREF decreases.
psychological and environmental domain as
compared to non- problematic group and similar
finding was also seen in previous study23.Our study References:
suggested that as the severity of anxiety increases,

NJIRM 2016; Vol. 7(5) September-October eISSN: 0975-9840 pISSN: 2230 - 9969 12
Association Of Anxiety And Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among Medical Students
1. Social,Digital and Mobile in India 2014 by Simon 16. Prevalence of Internet Addiction and Associated
KempReport-BB55685 IAMAI I-CUBE 2013 Factors among medical students from Mashhad,
2. I-Cube [Internet in India] Study by IMRB Iran in 2013.Maryam Salehi; Mina NoroziKhalili;
International and Internet and Mobile Association SeyedKaveh Hojjat 3; MahtaSalehi ; Ali Danesh .
of India [IAMAI]. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 May; 16(5):
3. Goldberg I. Internet Addiction 1996 e17256.
4. Young K. Internet addiction: the emergence of a 17. Young KS. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a
new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology& Behavior
1996;3:237-44 1998 Jan;1(3):237-244
5. Young K, Pistner M, O’Mara J, Buchanan J. Cyber- 18. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A.
disorders: the mental health concern for the new (1988). An inventory for
millennium. Cyberpsychol Behav1999;2:475-9. measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric
6. Mark Griffiths -A ‘components’ model of addiction properties. Journal of Consulting and
within a biopsychosocial 19. Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.
framework. Journal of Substance Use ; July 2009 20. WHOQOL Group. Development of the World
7. Lam LT, Peng ZW, Mai JC, Jing J. Factors associated Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life
with Internet addiction among adolescents. assessment.Psychol Med 1998; 551–558.
CyberpsycholBehav. 2009;12(5):551–5. 21. A study to evaluate internet addiction disorder
8. Internet and Computer Addiction : Signs, among students of a medical College and
symptoms, and help for balancing your associated hospital of central India by
time online and off;helpguide.org AmitMalviya, Sanjay Dixit,Harish Shukla, Ankita
9. Internet Addiction and its effects – Dr.Mark Mishra, Abhineet Jain, Amrita Tripathi. National
Hillman Journal of Community Medicine│Volume 5│Issue
10. David. N. Greenfield, Ph. D. Dr.Kimberly Young. 1│Jan – Mar 2014
Virtual Addiction.Center for Internet Addiction 21. The Relationship between Internet Addiction and
Recovery.American Psychiatric Assocaiation. Anxiety among students of University of Sargodha
11. Internet Addiction: Symptoms, Evaluation, And by MusarratAzher, Rashid Behram Khan,
Treatment - Dr. Kimberly S. Young Innovations in Muhammad Salim, Muhammad Bilal,
Clinical Practice (Volume 17) by L. VandeCreek& T. AltafHussain, MehvishHaseeb. International
L. Jackson (Eds.), Sarasota, FL: Professional Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4
Resource Press. No. 1; January 2014
12. Yoo HJ,Cho SC,Ha J,Yune SK,Kim SJ,Hwang J, et al. 22. Internet Over-Users’ Psychological Profiles: A
Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and Behavior Sampling Analysis on Internet Addiction
Internet addiction.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci by Leo Sang-Min Whang, Sujin Lee, and
2004;58:487-94. Geunyoung Chang. Cyberpsychology & Behavior
13. Leung L.Net-generation attributes and seductive ;Volume 6, Number 2, 2003
properties of the Internet as predictors of online
activities and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychcol Conflict of interest: None
Behav 2004;7:333-48. Funding: None
14. A study on the prevalence of internet addiction Cite this Article as: Nidhi N, Ashok V, Bharat P,
and its association with psychopathology in Indian Imran R, Kinjal V Association Of Anxiety And
adolescents by Deepak Goel, AlkaSubramanyam, Quality Of Life With Internet Addiction Among
and RavindraKamath. Indian Journal of Psychiatry Medical Students. Natl J Integr Res Med 2016;
2013; Volume: 55;Issue Number:2; Page: 140-143 7(5): 9-13
15. Prevalence and patterns of internet addiction
among medical students by Venkata
VenuGopalaRajuSrijampana, Ananda Reddy
Endreddy, KoiladaPrabhath, Bhagawan Rajana.
Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University.
November- December 2014;Vol 7 : Issue 6

NJIRM 2016; Vol. 7(5) September-October eISSN: 0975-9840 pISSN: 2230 - 9969 13

You might also like