ZOM MRP 006 (Management of Risks)

Doc# : MOF-QHSE-ZOSCO-PR-01
Engineering & Construction Division

Title Standard Operating Procedure : Management of |Risk
General Procedure
Management Of Risks


TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE........................................................................................................................4
2. REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................................4
3. DEFINITIONS.........................................................................................................................................4
4. RESPONSIBILITIES..............................................................................................................................4
5. PROCEDURES......................................................................................................................................7
5.1 GENERAL...........................................................................................................................................7
5.2 Identification Of Potential Risks.....................................................................................................8
5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL RISKS.........................................................................................8
5.3 Risk Assessments.......................................................................................................................10
5.3 RISK ASSESSMENTS......................................................................................................................10
Stages of the risk assessment..................................................................................................10
STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................10
5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria............................................................................................................12
5.4 RISK ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.......................................................................................................12
5.5 Detailed Risk Assessment Procedure.........................................................................................12
5.5 DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE..............................................................................12
Step 1: Task Identification........................................................................................................12
STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION...........................................................................................................12
Step 2: Hazard Identification.....................................................................................................13
STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION.....................................................................................................13
Step 3: Who/What might be harmed.........................................................................................14
STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED...........................................................................................14
Step 4: Quantify the risk...........................................................................................................15
STEP 4: QUANTIFY THE RISK..............................................................................................................15
Step 5: Control Measures.........................................................................................................16
STEP 5: CONTROL MEASURES...........................................................................................................16
Step 6: Residual Risk...............................................................................................................17
STEP 6: RESIDUAL RISK......................................................................................................................17


1. Scope and Purpose
The scope of this procedure applies to Health, Safety and Environmental risks
associated with projects undertaken by ZOSCO under the scope of the Project
Management.
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the methodology to be adopted in
performing the process of risk management within projects.
2. References
• Company Health, Safety and Environmental Manual;
• OHSAS 18001:1999 “Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series”;
• International Safety Management (ISM) Code;
3. Definitions
ZOSCO: Zamil Offshore Services Company

Hazard: A source or a situation with a potential for harm in terms of injury or ill
health, damage to property, damage to the workplace environment, or a
combination of these (OHSAS 18001:1999).
Risk: Combination of the likelihood and consequence(s) of a specified hazardous
event occurring (OHSAS 18001:1999).
Risk Assessment: Overall process of estimating the magnitude of risk and deciding
whether or not the risk is tolerable (OHSAS 18001:1999).
Tolerable Risk: Risk that has been reduced to a level that can be endured by the
organisation having regard to its legal obligations and its own OH & S Policy
(OHSAS 18001:1999).
Risk Owner: Person directly accountable for (the completion of) a process or
activity.
The Risk Owner for Subcontractor is the Subcontractor Project Manager.
4. Responsibilities
Project Manager who are in charge for a particular project phase, operation, task or
equipment, are responsible for ensuring that adequate risk assessment have been
conducted within the area of their competence.
In addition to that:
The Senior Management is responsible for review and agreement of measures to be
taken in reducing and mitigating risks within their area of competence. This includes,
but not limited to:
• Approval of plans and authorization /allocation of the necessary resources for
risk reduction;

• Identification of top-level risks which may not have been identified by the project
team.
The Chief Project Manager / Project Manager / QHSE Manager is responsible for
the overall implementation of this procedure.
The Project Manager, as delegated by the Chief Project Manager shall be
responsible for the risk management process for each project within his authority.
The Project Manager may delegate other project team members as “risk owners”
who will be responsible for evaluating the risks.
The Project Manager shall identify risks throughout the project and particularly at the
beginning where they should be included in the target budget document.
The Project Manager shall have overall responsibility for:
• Communicating information in order to provide a joint effort to identify and
mitigate risks;
• Ensuring that effective procedures are implemented to manage risks which may
affect the project;
• Identification of hazards;
• Evaluation of identified risks;
• Reporting significant risks to the Chief Project and QHSE Manager
• Audit (or arrangement of audit) of the project risk management process;
• Leading Hazid / Risk Assessment sessions;
• Preparation and maintenance of reports and logs;
• Accounting for the use of the risk management budget;
• Ensuring that approved risk reduction actions are integrated into the main project
schedule and budget;
• Monitoring progress on risks and risk reduction actions.
Project team members shall be responsible for:

• Identification of risks and advising the Project Manager;
• Cooperation in the provision of all data necessary for the effective identification
and assessment of risk;
• Proposing risk reduction actions and submitting them to the Project Manager for
approval;
• Ensuring that any subcontractors co-operate in the provision of risk data as
required;
• Implement risk reduction measures;

• Regularly review and update risks and monitor risk reduction in collaboration
with the Project Manager.
The Line Management shall:
• Ensure that the vessel/site risks are identified and control measures are in place;
• Lead the team involved in the vessel/site risk assessment;

• Be responsible for the direct implementation, on the unit under their
management, of the requirements/actions deriving from the risk assessment;
• Ensure that all risk assessments are adequately documented, filed, reviewed
and followed-up as well as that the relevant information/lessons learnt are
passed to the employees. The latter activity is essential for accident prevention.
The HSE personnel shall liaise and provide technical advice and guidance to
management involved in the risk assessment and shall monitor effectiveness.
All Personnel shall be responsible for acquainting themselves with the
requirements / findings of any risk assessments which have been carried out on
activities they may be involved in.
Subcontractors shall be advised of any risk management requirements which will be
included in subcontracts and in general shall:
• Report any significant risks to the Project Manager and provide the necessary
information required for risk assessment and control;
• Ensure that any applicable Risk Management Plan is implemented within their
scope of work;
• Ensure that own subcontractors report and provide all the information necessary
for the identification and evaluation of risk.
The Project HSE Department will be responsible for:
• Identifying and reporting any potential risks;
• Advising on HSE aspects relating to the management of risk;
• Providing further support/advice during the development of risk assessment and
auditing for compliance;
• Monitoring the compliance of the activities as specified within this procedure and
reporting to the Project Manager.
The HSE Manager shall be responsible for:
• Advising on HSE aspects relating to the whole management of risks process
within ZOSCO activities.
• Providing further support/advice during the development of risk assessment
studies
• Carrying out audits of the Company Risk Management System to ensure
compliance

• Monitoring the compliance of the activities as specified within this procedure and
reporting to the Company’s Senior Management accordingly.
Risk Authorisers and Authorisation of Risks
According to the assessed risk level and consequence category, acceptance of the
risk and its mitigation measures will be authorised by the Project Manager and or a
designated member of ZOSCO Management.
Risk Category
a) Low: Authorisation of Low Level Risks shall be given by the Project
Team Member who is responsible for the area in which the risk has been
identified. Project Manager /QHSE Manager shall be informed
accordingly.
b) Medium: Authorisation of Medium Level Risks shall be given by the
Project Manager. The Chief Project Manager and QHSE Manager shall be
informed accordingly by the Project Manager.
c) High: High risks should not be accepted and further control measures
shall be taken until the risk is reduced to a level which is considered As
Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP).
The full information of the risk shall be presented to the Project Manager /QHSE
Manager by the Project Manager. The Company’s President shall be informed
accordingly.
5. Procedures
5.1 General
ZOSCO has the duty to conduct “suitable” and “sufficient” risk assessments for
the key operations involving the business units and assess on a W.U.R./S.O.W
Package basis any specific risks additional to those associated with the
business unit.
The above is based on the assumption that employers have a legal obligation
to assess the risks from their work activities / sites and implement the relevant
risk control measures.
Consistent to the above, all activities must be covered by risk assessment
including routine works which will be covered by Job Safety Analysis (JSA).
Generally, specific risk assessment shall be undertaken prior to:
• Performing any non-routine activity
• Performing a new task
• When new people are involved
• When third party people are involved

• When major changes to the work/system are considered

Risk Assessments (RA) shall be carried out at the earliest practical opportunity
to identify, evaluate and subsequently eliminate, reduce or control the
significant risks that could lead to loss of life, equipment or endangering of the
environment.
In all cases RA should be conducted suitably in advance of the intended work
to allow the control measures to be correctly implemented.
RA’s shall be performed in a systematic manner to identify hazards from all
stages and all phases of work as defined in the scope. Hazards identified at
this stage may substantially reduce future liabilities.
The outline stages for performing these assessments, as detailed herein, are:
• The identification of all hazards;
• An evaluation of the associated risks;
• Determination and selection of risk reduction/control measures;
• Implementation of the control measures;
• Continuous monitoring of effectiveness.
The management of risk shall be conducted in accordance with the following
process map:
Results / feedback Risk Analysis/ Risk Analysis/ Risk Analysis/ R A Action

from other Risk & Assessment Assessment Assessment Record/
Project Final Report Action Record Action Record Status Logs
Reports
Y Risk
Identification E reduction
Risk Handling Risk Risk
of potential Risk S &
evaluation the risk monitoring reporting
risks
mitigatio
n
N
O Input for future
risk management
& continual
improvement
No action
required
5.2 Identification Of Potential Risks
At the beginning and throughout the project, the Project Manager shall prepare
and update an exhaustive list of events that may have a detrimental effect on
the project. This shall be carried out without rating their probability or impact of
their consequences. The purpose of this stage is to identify and where
possible, limit the effect of any potential risks that may affect the running of the
project. The list will be prepared from the following information:

• Review of project documents, plans and budgets;

• Review of previous projects reports, internal reviews, risk reports etc.;
• Past experience, (personal, team or through brainstorming;
• External sources, (expert advice);
• Identification of key events and decisions where risk may be introduced or
eliminated.
A Project specific Risk Management Plan may be prepared and issued as
required.
The content for a typical Risk Management Plan may be as follows:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Description of Project
1.2 Objectives
1.3 Application
2.0 ORGANISATION
2.1 Project Organisation
2.2 Responsibilities
3.0 RISK IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION
3.1 Identification of risks
3.2 Evaluation
3.3 Actions
3.4 Reports
This should be applied to each phase of the Project with specific regard to the
engineering and design installation as these are the phases where most of the
potential hazards may be eliminated/controlled in the first place.
This exercise should be carried out through an ad-hoc ‘Hazid Meeting’ called
and developed under the overall responsibility of the Project Manager.
These Hazid Meetings should e carried out throughout the various phases of
the Project (i.e. Engineering, design installation, fabrication, installation etc.).
A competent ‘Hazid’ team leader shall chair the meeting which is normally
attended by the representative(s) of the involved work disciplines.
The stages of the whole ‘Hazid’ exercise are outlined within the next section.
The process of hazard identification should be applied to each activity in turn.
Pre-determined deviations from normal conditions will enable an assessment
team to compile a comprehensive list of “things” that could realistically go
wrong.

Each potential risk shall be identified and documented on the Risk Assessment
Report (see App. 1).
5.3 Risk Assessments
 STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT
Three main stages of risk assessment are carried out prior to work
execution.
Stage 1 is conducted by Managers/project personnel and other technical
functions that have ownership and/or are involved in the operation(s)
being assessed.
This assessment is conducted towards the end of the project/equipment
design or engineering phase but well sufficiently in advance of the work to
allow adequate lead time to implement the required control measures.
The hazards identification and risk assessment process shall be
conducted in a form of a “Brain Storming” session where the ‘Structure
What If Techniques’ (SWIFT) is used to identify what realistically could go
wrong.
This ‘Brain Storming’ process may be facilitated by the use of the generic
‘SWIFT’ checklist (see App. 6) and or other tailor made checklists in order
to better suit the scope of the risk assessment.
After the hazards have been identified, the subsequent risk ranking shall
be determined according to the criteria outlined within the risk assessment
Severity Matrix (see App. 5).
The aim is to ensure that all aspects of the work have been assessed
including contingency methods and control measures defined before going
to the worksite such as that all risks are classified As Low As Reasonably
Practicable (ALARP). The assessment should also consider recovery
situations when the work does not go according to the plan.
Appropriate ‘Risk Owners’ shall be also identified and appointed during
this stage.
Time limit for completion of the action shall be also clearly defined.
The appointed ‘Risk Owners’ will manage the risks in such a way to:
• Prioritise actions;
• Schedule actions;
• Allocate resources as required;
• Assign responsibilities;
• Monitor progress;
• Track actions;

• Ensure completion and formal close out of actions.

Stage 2 is normally carried out at the worksite by the personnel directly
involved in the supervision of the activities using the documented results
of the Stage 1 assessment.
It is primarily instigated to confirming full understanding of the work and
control measures to be implemented but may be also used to further
assess details of the work, control and recovery measures.
Stage 3 is usually called the Tool Box Talk (TBT) phase and it is carried
out as a pre-job briefing given by the Supervisors to the personnel directly
under their control and who will be conducting the work.
Reference is made to the previous Stage 1 and 2 assessments and has
the purpose of ensuring that all personnel fully understand the work, the
control measures, any recovery or contingency measures and their
responsibilities in executing the job.
There is a degree of flexibility in how Stage 1 and 2 assessments are
carried out at the worksite; for example, they may be combined if all
personnel attend the shift briefing and have the opportunity to discuss /
raise further area of concerns.
What is of paramount importance is that everyone involved in the job is
fully aware of his responsibilities; accept the risks and their relevant
control measures.
Hazards shall be identified for each task undergoing a risk assessment
and they will be analyzed to determine the Risk Value.
“Risk Assessment” is the combination of two criteria.
Risk = Consequences x Probability
Consequence
When analyzing the consequences, the following factors shall be
considered:
Who/what can be directly or indirectly affected? (Fatal, major, moderate,
minor or slight injury)
What environmental damage can occur? (Massive, major, medium, minor
or slight effect)
What plant, process or equipment damage may result? (Total loss, major,
medium, minor or slight damage)
All these factors contribute to loss, which is principally caused by the
interaction between people, the environment, materials and equipment.
Probability
When analyzing the likelihood, the following factors shall be considered
based on the judgment of the likelihood of failure that:

• Harm will occur:

- Very likely;
- Likely;
- Possible;
- Unlikely;
- Very unlikely;
• Past history of the activity;
• Previous incidents history.
5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria
The assessment of risks will define both the Probability of an event and the
Consequence of that event.
These two attributes are used to determine the level of risk and the need for
mitigation measures to reduce the level of risk.
The level of risk (High, Medium and Low) will be assigned according to the
criteria outlined within the risk assessment Severity Matrix (see App. 5).
5.5 Detailed Risk Assessment Procedure
The Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment procedure comprises of 6

main steps which are described hereunder.
1. Task Identification
2. Hazard Identification
3. Identify who/what may be harmed
4. Quantifying the risk
5. Applying control measures
6. Re-appraising the residual risk
 STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION
Step 1
Team identify all tasks

in workscope Go to Step 2
Do any
existing
HIRA’s
partially match
scope?

 STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
Comments Step 2 Output
Team identify all tasks

Use hazard checklist below
in workscope
Use hazard checklist below Does checklist

or your personal list NO YES
cover all Go to Step 3
hazards?
Add to your own checklist Go to Step 3


 STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED
Comments Step 3 Output
Identify who might be

harmed
Identify what might be

Use hazard checklist below harmed
NO Does checklist YES

or your personal list cover all Go to Step 4
hazards?
Add to your own

Go to Step 4
personal checklist

 STEP 4: QUANTIFY THE RISK
Output
Step 4
What are the potential most

likely consequences?
Identify consequence
level for each hazard
Identify probability level

for each hazard
Identify Risk level

Go to Step 5

 STEP 5: CONTROL MEASURES
Output
Step 5
List Control Measures

against each risk
NO Are control YES

measures covered Go to Step 6
by standard criteria/
work practice?
Add new controls to your

personal list Go to Step 6

 STEP 6: RESIDUAL RISK
Output
Step 6
Re-evaluate residual risk

with control measures
in place
Repeat step 4
NO YES
Is each residual Job can proceed
risk in L with caution
category?
Monitor effectiveness of
control
YES NO
Can further
controls be
identified?
Re-evaluate residual risk

NO with further control in place
YES Job can proceed

Is risk in M
with management
category?
authorisation
STOP Job has H category

risk level and
Can not proceed

5.6 Handling The Risk
Following the process of risk assessment it will become evident that many risks
will be avoidable or their consequences reduced through the execution of
specific risk reduction and mitigating actions.
The Project Manager shall consider the project risks commencing with the most
significant scores and decide on the measures to be taken to avoid them or
reduce the consequence.
The following actions may be taken to handle the risk:
• Do not accept if the risk level makes it unacceptable;
• Transfer the risk to others (subcontractor or insurer) who may be in a
better position to handle the risk either due to experience (subcontractor) or
statistical compensation (insurer);
• Instigate preventive measures (modify design, acquire equipment or carry
out additional work etc.) always aware of the residual risk;
• If the three actions above are not successful, include provisions to enable
that the project activities are carried out according to the required level of
safety.
The above actions are not absolute and may therefore be used jointly.
5.7 Risk Reduction Measures
Once the risks have been assigned a “Risk Value”, they must be assessed
against agreed acceptability criteria. The indication of the action and time scale
for addressing control measures is presented below.
5.8 Risk Reduction Hierarchy
Risk Reduction Hierarchy

1. Eliminate the risk by removing the hazard - “design out” the
problem at source.
2. Reduce the risk by substitution of a less hazardous process,
activity or substance.
3. Isolate (protect everyone) by effective controls such as
enclosing the hazard, removing the person from the hazard or
reducing the person’s exposure time to the hazard.
4. Install protective devices such as guards, emergency stops and
trip switches etc.
5. Enforce Permits-to-work, special rules and procedures to closely
control the hazard(s)
6. Provide proper supervision / monitoring, supported by training,
instruction and relevant information

7. Provide Personal Protective Equipment only as a “last resort”

and in support of the above control measures
In addition to those above, other control measures may be required in

accordance with:
• Legislation and “Approved Codes of Practice”;
• Customer requirements;
• International standards.
The purpose of the mitigation is to reduce the risk before it occurs.
The planned preventive actions will be identified according to the ALARP
principle which states that, in order to control risks in the workplace, the
resources (financial, human and material) which need to be applied to
control the risk are directly proportional to the level of risk.
The Risk Assessment Action Record shall be used to specify whether the
risk reduction measures have actually been implemented, will be
implemented, or is currently an option with the action decision dates noted
wherever possible.
Once the relevant risk reduction measures have been agreed and
included in the Risk Assessment Report each single action shall be
recorded by the use of the Risk Assessment Action Record.
The overall status of the required reduction measures shall be recorded
within the Risk Assessment Action Record Summary Log.
On completion of the complete risk assessment process, action shall be
taken by the Assessment Team Leader/Hazid Chairman to ensure that the
necessary controls are implemented.
This will be achieved by issuing the Risk Assessment Report together with
the Risk Assessment Action Record to the appropriate Manager of the
operation / activity covered by the assessment.
When a risk reduction measure has been agreed the Project
Manager/Vessel-Site Management shall be responsible for
implementation of this activity.
As the status of existing risks and the identification of new risks will alter
throughout the duration of the project, the Risk Assessment Report and
the related Risk Assessment Action Record shall be regularly updated.
5.9 Risk Monitoring
The effectiveness of risk reduction measures can only be measured over

time and therefore continuous monitoring is required.
Once risk reduction measures have been integrated into the relevant risk
assessment reports, their progress shall be constantly monitored by the

Project Manager in conjunction with the Risk Manager (where appointed) /

HSE Manager and the ‘Risk Owners’.
The monitoring shall be assured by regularly updating the relevant risk reports
and reviewing the status of actions.
5.10 Reporting and Records
On completion of Stage 1 Risk Assessment a formal report shall be issued.

This report shall have, as a minimum, the following content:
1. Introduction
− Scope including a summary outline of the work tasks
2. Assessment Records
− The completed forms
3. Recommendations
− Control measures to be implemented (including the responsible person
and time limit).
4. Appendices (as required).
As far as practicable, all activities identified as High (H) or Medium (M) Risk
shall have control measures clearly defined and assessed during Stage 1 of the
‘Hazid’ meeting.
The appointed ‘Risk Owner’ shall report the progress of relevant actions to the
Project Manager and also ensure that any change in risk parameters or new
risks that have appeared are captured and managed accordingly.
Once actions are completed the final ‘Hazid’ Report can be prepared and
issued by the Project Manager.
Stage 2 risk assessments requires the involved forms from stage 1 to be
reviewed and enhanced as needed with further appropriate worksite interface
controls.
When carrying out Stage 3 risk assessment or Tool Box Talk (TBT), the
completed forms and permit to work if relevant, need to be kept on record
during the entire life of the project.
Depending on the size and complexity of the project, the basis of reporting will
be by the following forms:
• Risk Assessment Report (see App. 1): it is used during the ‘Hazid’ meeting
where the whole process of identifying and assessing and ranking the risks
is documented.
• Risk Assessment Actions Record (see App. 2); it used to individually
record any further action which is required to be put in place prior to starting

the operations. Any individual action record will have to be formally closed
out by the identified risk owner prior to commencing the job.
• The status of risk assessment actions shall be recorded by use of the Risk
Assessment Action Record Summary Log (see App. 3): this is used to
formally record all the required actions and track completion dates.
The requirements and method of reporting shall be determined at the start of
the project by the Chief Project Manager/ Project Manager / QHSE Manager
with consideration of client requirements.
Reporting on mitigation activities and progress shall be considered an
important and essential part of the risk management process.
The reporting periods will be specified by the contract and reporting procedures
or as directed by the Project Manager.
New risks, which are identified in the middle of reporting periods, shall be
recorded on the relevant forms and distributed as necessary.
Risk reporting will form part of the measurement and analysis for the continual
improvement process and input into future risk management processes.
All assessment records shall be filed and held by the relevant “Risk Owner”
within the respective project organization.
They shall be reviewed on a regular basis to ascertain if further assessments
are required and/or that the recommendations are being fully implemented /
closed out.
 Subcontractors Risks
The Project Manager assisted by the Project Representative responsible

for each subcontractor shall be confident that:
The subcontractor has properly identified and assessed all of their risks.
Proper resources/measures are put in place to ensure adequate
monitoring over the effectiveness of the subcontractor’s control of these
risks.
Subcontractor shall be required to:
• Manage the identification and assessment of risks pertinent to their
spheres of activities
• Confirm whether their scope of work is covered by risk assessment
• Conduct risk assessments as required by the Company
Formal reviews will then be performed to improve or validate the input
data and to ensure that all significant risks have been identified in each
area.
This review process will ensure:
• Complete coverage of all aspects of the Project

• Consistency of approach to risk management across the Project
5.11 Job Safety Analysis (JSA)/Work Rsik Analysis (WRA)
The aim of the Job Safety Analysis (JSA) is to clearly identify the hazards to
which an employee will be exposed to on a daily basis at the specific worksite
as they carry out their duties.
It is the responsibility of the Line Manager(s) to ensure that suitable JSA exist
for all the operations carried out within their area of responsibility and that they
are reviewed and updated accordingly.
A JSA is a process, used to identify, analyze and record the steps involved in
performing a specific job.
A WRA is a process, used to identify, analyze and record the steps involved in
performing a specific work.
 RESPONSIBILITIES
• The Line Management is responsible for the implementation of the
whole JSA process;
• The supervisor in charge of the job is responsible for the execution
of the JSA prior to starting the job.
• The HSE personnel on board/sites (i.e., Safety Officer) acts as an
advisor during the whole JSA process and monitor correct
implementation.
• The Project Management office representative is responsible for
WRA .QHSE Manager acts as an advisor in WRA preparation.
 PROCEDURES
Step 1:
The job is chronologically broken down into steps.
Each step describes a stand-alone activity or task.
Step 2:
Each step is analyzed with the workers involved. The potential hazards
associated with the steps are identified and discussed. The risk arising
from the hazards are evaluated. Relevant risks are recorded accordingly.
The ‘trigger’ word to start and carry out the whole exercise is “What if”?
The questions to be answered during this second step are, but not limited
to the following:
• What can go wrong?
• What could be the consequences?
• How could it happen?

• What are the contributing factors?

In order to facilitate the “What if”? process, the generic JSA checklist may
be used (see App. 7).
Other specific checklists could be also used to better suit the scope of the
JSA.
Step 3:
When the risks are assessed, it is crucial to determine methods to mitigate
them.
The methods may include:
• Technical controls to :
- Eliminate / minimize the hazards like redesigning equipment,
remove the hazards, etc. such as installing ventilation,
- Isolate the hazard with machine guards, welding curtains, etc.,
- Enclose the hazards using enclosures for noisy equipment, etc.
• Administrative controls such as Permit To Work, work instructions,
alarms, warnings, training, etc.
• Personal Protective Equipment when technical controls do not
eliminate the hazards, when safe work practices do not provide
sufficient controls may not be feasible.
All these mitigation methods can be combined.
The mitigation methods are recorded and the responsible person for the
implementation is nominated.
Step 4:
The results of JSA are discussed with the full team of workers assigned to
the job before the beginning of the works during a pre-job meeting/Tool
Box Talk (TBT).
Step 5:
The JSA has to be reviewed and updated periodically to determine
whether changes are needed in the job procedure or in the preventive
measures or in the actions taken previously.
GENERAL PROCEDURE Doc. n°: ZOM-MRP-006
REV. 0 DATE 30/06/05
PAGE : 23 OF 23
MANAGEMENT OF RISKS
APPENDICES
1. RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT -
2. RISK ASSESSMENT ACTION RECORD
3. RISK ASSESSMENT ACTION RECORD SUMMARY LOG
4. JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS
5. SEVERITY MATRIX
6. JSA CHECKLIST

ZOM MRP 006 (Management of Risks)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ZOM MRP 006 (Management of Risks)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Doc# : MOF-QHSE-ZOSCO-PR-01

Engineering & Construction Division

Engineering & Construction Division

Engineering & Construction Division

1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE........................................................................................................................4

5.2 Identification Of Potential Risks.....................................................................................................8

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL RISKS.........................................................................................8

5.3 Risk Assessments.......................................................................................................................10

5.3 RISK ASSESSMENTS......................................................................................................................10

Stages of the risk assessment..................................................................................................10

STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................10

5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria............................................................................................................12

5.4 RISK ASSESSMENT CRITERIA.......................................................................................................12

5.5 Detailed Risk Assessment Procedure.........................................................................................12

5.5 DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE..............................................................................12

Step 1: Task Identification........................................................................................................12

STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION...........................................................................................................12

Step 2: Hazard Identification.....................................................................................................13

STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION.....................................................................................................13

Step 3: Who/What might be harmed.........................................................................................14

STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED...........................................................................................14

Step 4: Quantify the risk...........................................................................................................15

STEP 4: QUANTIFY THE RISK..............................................................................................................15

Step 5: Control Measures.........................................................................................................16

STEP 5: CONTROL MEASURES...........................................................................................................16

Step 6: Residual Risk...............................................................................................................17

STEP 6: RESIDUAL RISK......................................................................................................................17

Engineering & Construction Division

1. Scope and Purpose

ZOSCO: Zamil Offshore Services Company

Engineering & Construction Division

Project team members shall be responsible for:

Engineering & Construction Division

• Lead the team involved in the vessel/site risk assessment;

Engineering & Construction Division

Engineering & Construction Division

• When major changes to the work/system are considered

Results / feedback Risk Analysis/ Risk Analysis/ Risk Analysis/ R A Action

Engineering & Construction Division

• Review of project documents, plans and budgets;

Engineering & Construction Division

 STAGES OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT

Engineering & Construction Division

• Ensure completion and formal close out of actions.

Engineering & Construction Division

• Harm will occur:

5.4 Risk Assessment Criteria

The Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment procedure comprises of 6

 STEP 1: TASK IDENTIFICATION

Team identify all tasks

Engineering & Construction Division

 STEP 2: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Comments Step 2 Output

Team identify all tasks

Use hazard checklist below Does checklist

Add to your own checklist Go to Step 3

Engineering & Construction Division

 STEP 3: WHO/WHAT MIGHT BE HARMED

Comments Step 3 Output

Identify who might be

Identify what might be

NO Does checklist YES