1.Name of the project.

2.Project nature.
2. 1. Description of the project (what you want to do).
2. 2. Grounds or justification (why it is done, reason for being and origin of the draft).
2. 3. Institutional framework (responsible organization).
2. 4. Purpose of the project (expected impact).
2. 5. Objectives.
2. 6. Goals.
2. 7. Beneficiaries (how much you want to do, services to be provided and / or needs that
will be covered).
2. 8. Beneficiaries (recipients of the project: to whom it is addressed).
2. 9. Products (results of activities).
2. 10. Physical location and spatial coverage (where it will be done and what it will cover).
3.Operational specification of activities and tasks to be performed (with what
actions, the necessary products and activities are generated).
4.Methods and techniques to be used (modes of operation).
5. Determination of deadlines, or calendar of activities (when it will occur).
6 Determination of the necessary resources (who and with what will they carry out
the project: inputs).
6. 1. Humans.
6. 2. Materials.
6. 3. Technicians.
6. 4. Financial.
7. Calculation of the costs of execution or elaboration, of the budget.
7.1. Personnel costs.
7. 2. Diets and per diem.
7. 3. Premises.
7. 4. Material and equipment.
7. 5. Operating expenses.
7. 6. Benefits.
7. 7 Costs.
8. Project management.
8.1. Organization chart.
8. 2. Personnel functions.
8. 3. Control mechanisms.
8. 4. Internal and external evaluation systems.
8.5. Information channels.
9. Project evaluation indicators.
9.1. Independence.
9.2. Verification
9. 3. Validity.
9. 4. Accessibility.
10. External conditioning factors, or prerequisites for the
achievement of the effects and impact of the project.
Unlike the previous guide, for ILPES, the fundamental importance of
stages prior to the presentation of the project, since that part of the assumption that
The purpose of the project, as a document of analysis, is to provide elements of judgment
to make decisions about its execution or about the support that should be given to its
realization. For this, the technical, economic, financial,
administrative and institutional aspects prior to the project and the following stages are
suggested:
•Identification of the idea.
•Final draft or feasibility study.
Alternative solutions technical, economic, financial and social.
•Design of the project
•Project execution plan.
•Project evaluation.
•Decision making.

For financing projects linked to the field of innovation and technological development in
the productive sectors, Colciencias demands the following format to the projects:
•Relevance of the project with the competitiveness strategy of the company.
•Project development objective.
•Specific objectives of the project.
•Methodology of the project.
•Organizational scheme of the project.
•Analysis of commercial and technological risks of the project.
•Group executing the project (name, profession, level of training and
professional experience).
•Innovation and technological development of the project. Contribution of the project to
the innovation or technological development.

A Likert-type scale assumes that the strength/intensity of experience is linear, i.e. on a

continuum from strongly agree to strongly disagree and makes the assumption that attitudes can
be measured. Respondents may be offered a choice of five to seven or even nine pre-coded
responses with the neutral point being neither agree nor disagree.

Likert Scales have the advantage that they do not expect a simple yes / no answer from the
respondent, but rather allow for degrees of opinion, and even no opinion at all. Therefore
quantitative data is obtained, which means that the data can be analyzed with relative ease.
However, like all surveys, the validity of Likert Scale attitude measurement can be compromised
due social desirability. This means that individuals may lie to put themselves in a positive
light. For example, if a likert scale was measuring discrimination, who would admit to being
racist?
(McLeod, 2008)
McLeod, S. A. (2008). Likert scale. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html
¨Focus Group is a type of in-depth interview accomplished in a group, whose meetings present
characteristics defined with respect to the proposal, size, composition, and interview procedures.
The focus or object of analysis is the interaction inside the group. The participants influence each
other through their answers to the ideas and contributions during the discussion. The moderator
stimulates discussion with comments or subjects. The fundamental data produced by this
technique are the transcripts of the group discussions and the moderator's reflections and
annotations¨. (Freitas et al, 1998)