bitsfit.club and openInvent.

club
contact: Ember Autumn Rose
250 South Lyon Ave Ste. E -108
Hemet, CA 92543
openInvent@protonmail.com

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

To a person I do not consider my representative, from me, a person that feels like the last
American In hypocrisy:

Senator Fiensiten:

I do not support any of your laws or amendments I only vouch for the denial and disparagement
of the people’s rights and the false representation of the people by one district attorney
representative. What I wrote was published publically at tiny.cc/InjusticeInJustice.

I say the enforcing the law implys the use of Force which in turn denys the right to liberty. I also
make light of the flaw in law being that root entemology and terminology can be changed thus
crimes like slavery and denial of minimum wage can concealed under the guise of new
terminology like "mandatory probation/parole" or phrases like institutional security which allow
for monopolies which deny rights of speech and access to attorneys and access to means to
earn income to pay for a persons defense who is no longer part of the public. So law is not
unlike coleslaw and may I incite demur by plaguarization of the case law kimchi v. sourkrat to
deny a judge the act of making his own decision on a case.

I support the right to Assemble In Peace and say that there is no better assertion than use of the
internet in public hospitals institutions and correctional systems.

For crapitalism: I suppose a Peoples' Amenders' office with creation of jobs of testing,
amending, and reporting laws and cases publicly ie via lawtube.gov; And the standardization of
law enumeration from state to state with state ratifications or amendments listed in juxaposition.
And Law Enforcement Testing of law tiny.cc/leebar so that they may enforce the laws.

Also I say that the judge denies freedom of speech and by striking evidence form the record that
judge conceals documentary evidence which is a crime punishable by law such as the "three
strikes law".
 bitsfit.club and openInvent.club
contact: Ember Autumn Rose
250 South Lyon Ave Ste. E -108
Hemet, CA 92543
openInvent@protonmail.com

I deem myself to be anti- democratic republican and pray for

delucement of time travelers who will liberate my world and go back in time and sign papers in a
place called Pencilvania prior to the invention of pencils and my knowledge of crapitalism.
Perhaps last of the lineages of John Quincy Adams. Or perhaps nazis will go back to the
periods of pyramids and set[h] and walk like Egyptian swastikas.

-Ember AR [augmented reality] Leona

of openInvent.club

PS>

It seems that my emails get "lost" you can snail mail me at the address below and I will reply
with sticker gifts.(tiny.cc/oisticker)

Ember AR Leona

250 S. Lyon Ave Ste E 108

Hemet, CA 92543

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

-------- Original Message --------

On February 13, 2018 1:18 PM, Senator Dianne Feinstein <senator@feinstein.senate.gov> wrote:

Dear Ember:

Thank you for writing to express your support for open access to the Internet. I appreciate hearing
from you on this important issue, and I welcome the opportunity to respond.

I understand that you are concerned about Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit
 bitsfit.club and openInvent.club
contact: Ember Autumn Rose
250 South Lyon Ave Ste. E -108
Hemet, CA 92543
openInvent@protonmail.com

Pai’s views on net neutrality and that you oppose loosening regulations on Internet providers.

As you know, in 2015, the FCC approved rules that allow the agency to regulate Internet service
providers and prevent them from giving favorable treatment to some websites but not others. The
rules are based on Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 and Section 706 of
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104). In developing its rules, the FCC
stated: “Together Title II and Section 706 support clear rules of the road, providing the certainty
needed for innovators and investors, and the competitive choices and freedom demanded by
consumers.” The FCC also stated that, under the rules, “broadband providers may not favor some
lawful Internet traffic over other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind—in other
words, no ‘fast lanes.’” In June 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit ruled that the FCC had the authority to issue net neutrality rules, allowing the agency to
regulate Internet service providers.

On May 18, 2017, the FCC voted in favor of starting the rulemaking process to overturn the net
neutrality rules. And on December 14, 2017, by a 3-2 party-line vote the FCC repealed net
neutrality protections and reversed the rules approved in 2015. You can find more information
regarding this vote at the link below:

https://sen.gov/feinstein/QQNR

Please know that I believe that a free and open Internet is key for economic growth and
innovation. You may be interested to know that, before the FCC’s vote, I sent a letter to FCC
Chairman Ajit Pai highlighting the importance of net neutrality, specifically for women-owned
businesses. You may view the letter at the link below:

https://sen.gov/feinstein/O4MX

Additionally, on December 4, 2017, I signed a letter led by Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) with 14 of my
Senate colleagues expressing concern over allegations that bots had filed comments to the FCC
during the net neutrality rulemaking process. The letter also requested information about alleged
anomalies surrounding the public record and called for a delay of the planned vote on December
14, 2017, to roll back net neutrality rules.
 bitsfit.club and openInvent.club
contact: Ember Autumn Rose
250 South Lyon Ave Ste. E -108
Hemet, CA 92543
openInvent@protonmail.com

I also recognize that you support reversing the FCC’s vote on net neutrality using the Congressional
Review Act (Public Law 104-121). Specifically, I understand that you support passage of a
resolution of disapproval to reverse these actions. On December 14, 2017, Senator Edward Markey
(D-MA) announced that he will be introducing a resolution of congressional disapproval that would
reverse the FCC’s recent decision to repeal the 2015 rules on net neutrality. You may be pleased to
know I am a cosponsor of this resolution. This resolution would use the Congressional Review
Act to preserve net neutrality protections and invalidate the FCC’s decision. Please know that I will
be sure to keep your views in mind should legislation on this issue come before me in the Senate.

Once again, thank you for writing. Should you have any other questions or comments, please call my
Washington, D.C., office at (202) 224-3841 or visit my website at feinstein.senate.gov. You can
also follow me online at YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, and you can sign up for my email
newsletter at feinstein.senate.gov/newsletter.

Best regards.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein

United States Senator