INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : EMEROSE F. FURIO Name of Rater: ELOI A. MANDRILLA

Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION-SORSOGON Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2017-MARCH 2018

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFO TIME WEIGHT 4 ACTUAL
’s
KRA’s OBJECTIVES LINE Per KRA 5 3 2 1 RESULT
SCORE
OUTSTANDING
VERY
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR Q T E A
SATISFACTORY
1.Prepared DLL/DLP on Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
daily or weekly basis with All 3 2 1 0
the following considerations; considerations considerations considerations consideration consideration
-With complete parts were met were met were met were met was met
-With appropriate IM
10%
-Using the prescribed Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
template Daily 1 time found no 2 times found 3 times found no 4 or more
-Following the guidelines plan no plan plan times found
TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS

no plan
BASIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES

stipulated in DepEd Order

No. 42, s. 2016
2.Facilitated learning Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency
through innovative teaching 75-100% pupils 70-74% pupils 65-69% pupils 60-64% pupils 59% & below
strategies to attain 80% June
(30%)

performance level 2017 to 15% Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality

-Class Record March 80% & above PL 75-79% PL 70-74% PL 65-69% PL 60-64% PL
-Summative Test 2018
-QuarterlyTest with TOS
3.Maintained a safe, child- Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency
friendly, gender-sensitive & 95-100% 85-94% 75-84% 75-84% 50% & below
motivating learning Implemented Implemented Implemented Implemented implemented
environment by
implementing 95-100% of
the ff. DepEd programs. 15%
-Child Protection Policy Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
-Solid Waste Management Implemented on 1 quarter late 2 quarters late 3 quarters late 4 quarters
-DRRM time late
-Greening Program
 1.Monitored evaluated and Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
maintained pupils’ progress 4 All tools were 3 tools were 2 tools were 1 tool is used None
times quarterly by using the ff. used used used
tools.
10%
-varied & appropriated
assessments Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
-grading sheets 4 times quarterly 3 times quarterly 2 times quarterly Once only None
-tests with corresponding TOS
2.Implemented Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
intervention/work plan to All indicators 3 indicators 2 indicators 1 indicator attained None
PUPILS’ OUTCOMES

attain the target attained attained attained

-letter to the parents
June
(Informing the conduct of
2017 to
(35%)

intervention)
-Conduct of Remedial Class
March 10%
Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
-Remedial exam result 2018 On time 1 month late 2 months late 3 months late 4 months late
-letter to the parent (informing implementation
the result whether the child is
ready or for transition)

3.Maintained and updated Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency

pupils’ school records monthly All records 3 records 2 records 1 record updated None
such as: updated updated updated
-SF 1 10%
-SF 2 Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
-Class Records Monthly Bimonthly Quarterly Once every 2 Yearly
-Forms-137 & 138 quarters
1.Attained, evaluated 75- Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency
100% strong partnership with 75-100% above 65-74% 60-64% 55-59% 54% & below
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
PARENT’S INVOLVEMENT &

parents and community partnership partnership partnership partnership partnership

people by maintaining the ff:
June
-Zero conflict with the
2017 to
(20%)

stakeholders 5%
March
-Awarding/recognizing active Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
stakeholders 2018 All conditions 3 conditions 2 conditions 1 condition was None
-75% attendance to were met were met were met met
HRPTA/Gen. Assembly
-HTPTA Projects
1.Under taken measures for Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
PERSONAL GROWTH AND

professional growth & All were 3 were 2 were 1 was undertaken None
DEVOLOPMENT (15%)

June
PROFESSIONAL

development by having 95- undertaken undertaken undertaken

2017
100% attendance in the ff:
to 15%
- DLAC Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency Efficiency
March
- INSET 95-100% 90-94% 85-89% 80-84% 79% and
2018
- Seminars/ workshop attendance attendance attendance attendance below
- Post graduate studies attendance
 1.Adhered to work & Quality Quality Quality Quality Quality
professional ethics and All conditions 3 conditions 2 conditions 1 condition was None
standards guided by existing were met were met were met met
DepEd & CSC rules, policies
and regulations to maintain Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness Timeliness
the ff. conditions 0 instance found 1 instance 2 instances 3 instances found 4 or more
10%
– zero conflict with non- compliance found non- found non- non- compliance instances
stakeholders compliance compliance found non-
– maintain/update teacher’s compliance
portfolio
- punctuality and attendance
- uniform / dress code
OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
 To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

EMEROSE F. FURIO ELOI A. MANDRILLA

Teacher I Principal I
Ratee Rater
 Republic of the Philippines
Departement of Education
Region V
Division of Sorsogon
BULUSAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bulusan, Sorsogon
DIVISION OF SORSOGON

IPCRF
INDIVIDUAL PEROFRMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Prepared by:

EMEROSE F. FURIO
Teacher I

Noted by:

ELOI A. MANDRILLA
Principal I