Auditors rely on management representations when preparing financial statements, so fraud is difficult to detect if management lacks integrity. Fraud involving collusion between employees and management can also circumvent internal controls. Audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive, as it comprises pieces of information that gradually persuade the auditor of the statements' fairness, rather than prove it with certainty. Auditors are only required to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatements, not absolute assurance, as limitations like sampling risk, cost-benefit constraints, and human error make absolute accuracy impossible.
Auditors rely on management representations when preparing financial statements, so fraud is difficult to detect if management lacks integrity. Fraud involving collusion between employees and management can also circumvent internal controls. Audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive, as it comprises pieces of information that gradually persuade the auditor of the statements' fairness, rather than prove it with certainty. Auditors are only required to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatements, not absolute assurance, as limitations like sampling risk, cost-benefit constraints, and human error make absolute accuracy impossible.
Auditors rely on management representations when preparing financial statements, so fraud is difficult to detect if management lacks integrity. Fraud involving collusion between employees and management can also circumvent internal controls. Audit evidence is persuasive rather than conclusive, as it comprises pieces of information that gradually persuade the auditor of the statements' fairness, rather than prove it with certainty. Auditors are only required to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatements, not absolute assurance, as limitations like sampling risk, cost-benefit constraints, and human error make absolute accuracy impossible.
C. Fraudulently prepared Financial Statements are often different to detect
Auditors rely on management’s written presentations, and it would be difficult to detect fraud if the management lacks integrity – the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. So if the management doesn’t make an honest assessment of the financial statements, it would lead the auditor into making false representations of financial statements because he based on unreliable evidences Although the auditor performs procedures to detect material misstatements when auditing financial statements, such procedures may not be effective in detecting misstatements resulting from collusion among employees and management’s circumvention of internal control. The majority of insider fraud losses are cause by this collusion. It is posing threats to businesses because it involves larger damages & is more difficult to detect. When more employees are involved, there are more opportunities to commit fraud and it is easier to circumvent or overcome the anti-fraud controls since the employees are typically familiar with the controls that have been put in place, and then conceal the fraud longer Evidence obtained by the auditor doesn’t consist of “hard facts.” It comprises pieces of information and impressions which are gradually accumulated during the course of an audit which persuades the auditor about the fairness of the financial statements. Thus, audit evidence is generally persuasive- from the word “persuade”, meaning to make someone believe on something, rather than conclusive- meaning it is undeniably true or 100% certain that it is the truth. D. Auditors believe that reasonable assurance is sufficient in the vast majority of cases An auditor is required to obtain reasonable assurance whether financial statements give true and fair view or in others words, he must be reasonably sure that financial statements are free from material misstatements. Absolute assurance means that there is absolutely no misstatement in the financial statement and thus financial statements are absolutely reliable and relevant for the user of financial statements. On the other hand, reasonable assurance is also a high level of assurance but it means that auditor has conducted the engagement in a way that he is reasonable to the best possible extent provided the situation circumstances he is reasonable sure that financial statements are free from material misstatement but there might be some misstatements that go undetected. All professions accept that some form of judgment is involved when rendering an opinion, and that those judgments aren’t always perfectly accurate. The auditor does not provide absolute assurance but reasonable assurance, because there are certain limitations. An example is the limitation “sampling risk”, wherein instead of examining the entire population, the auditor would only examine a small portion of the population, because it would be costly and would take a lot of time on examining the entire population for that would be impractical. Cost-benefit limitations- conducting audit engagement requires resources which auditor might not have or in auditor’s judgment cost of gaining additional assurance will be higher than the benefit gained and thus not obtained. Even with good faith and integrity, mistakes in judgment can be made because auditors are humans and can therefore commit human error.