Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sarah Mattis
26 February 2018
THE 3214
Precious Stones
conflict through the eyes of diverse characters of color, most of which identify as members of the
LGBTQ+ community. This 120-minute play brings to light issues of gender, sexuality, and
nationalism. As the title suggests, the presence of stones symbolizes both the literal and
metaphorical use of stones during the intifada and Stonewall uprising, ultimately tying the
identities of the two protagonists together. As the play progresses, the audience becomes more
aware of the differing opinions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as cultural expectations
burden the protagonists. The two protagonists, Andrea, the single, Jewish lesbian, and Leila, the
married, Palestinian lesbian must face hurdles that prevent them from really being together.
These two women must learn to navigate around their differences and similarities to overcome
the stigmatism that surrounds their identity as women, nationalists, and lesbians.
Khoury does not leave extra room to dive into character development and emotional
involvement, fully packing the play with social and political issues addressed by the characters
regarding the Occupation and the Intifada. Because of this, it becomes hard to sympathize with
either character, as not much transpires between them. Are they really in love or are they in love
with the idea of each other? The two compare memories, knowledge, and trauma as to not
dismiss the struggles of each culture, but the audience does not get the chance to see the
complexity of their characters, as opposed to their Lesbian, Palestinian, and Jewish identities.
Mattis 2
The audience then unpacks the intensity of the spitfire dialogue that opens act two, bringing all
six characters on stage at once. Theatre of this manner becomes so complex and collaborative
among the playwright, director, actors, and audiences (Worthen 1509). The political and social
turmoil exhibited in this play incentivizes people to watch it. Precious Stones is a modernist play
The play focuses on the opinions of both sides of the conflicts with three Jewish
characters and three Palestinian characters. Each character has a sense of nationalism that
surrounds their identity, ranging from minimal involvement to full-fledged pride and patriotism.
The characters of Rachel, Andrea’s Jewish roommate who also happens to be a lesbian and
Andrea’s ex, and Samir, Leila’s closeted-gay, Palestinian husband, represent those who don’t
really see a necessity for patriotism. They both put themselves before their nationality as Rachel
says “I’m a dyke before I’m a Jew,” and Samir states that “the love of [his] life is a Jew”
(Khoury, 54; 68). While the characters of Bassima, Leila’s cousin, and Esther, Andrea’s boss,
represent the extreme patriots, Leila and Andrea both have a strong sense of nationalism that
invokes pride in their respective people. However, they both have the maturity and intelligence
to be open to listening to their opposite views, hence their first introduction of trying to organize
a dialogue group between Jewish and Palestinian women. The strong sense of nationalism
Leila and Andrea not only belong to different nationalities, but they belong to two
different classes. Andrea, a member of working-class America, calls Leila out for her privilege in
scene four of act two. While her exoticism tends to group her in a lower class in America, it is
evident that Leila and Samir belong in the upper class of America, partly due to her family’s
money and Samir’s success as a lawyer, ironically at a predominantly Jewish firm. These class
Mattis 3
differences are evident by their living situations as well as their perspective on many of the
events occurring around them (Layoun). They both acknowledge that while they participate in
political activism, they would rather stay where they are in America, where it is safer for them.
childbearing. Both women reveal that they do not wish to procreate, ultimately disrespecting
their family’s values as women. Jewish men expect Jewish women to “increase the Jewish
birthrate” or else “finish[ing] Hitler’s job” (Sharoni, 34; Khoury, 84). Palestinians live out the
notion that “motherhood equals nationhood” (Sharoni 35). Bassima represents the ideal
Palestinian woman, someone who is loyal to her deceased husband and raises her children as a
full-time job. The patriarchal society of Palestine has become politicized, leaving women and
children to struggle (Mayer 76). Both Leila and Andrea reflect on their family histories as the
This expectation of women in their cultures ties in with their sexual identity, as both
women are open to each other about their attractions. Leila, however, feels reservations about
their relationship becoming public because her society forbids homosexuality. She states that she
does “not want to be a martyr for the gay Arab cause” (Khoury 85). Leila’s fears are extensions
of the fears of women in the Occupation as their sexuality was now brought into the public
sphere, highlighting the power structure of the “occupier and the occupied” (Mayer 78). While
Precious Stones is a play surrounding the western attitudes regarding the Israeli-Palestinian
Conflict and the intifada, it is also undeniably a lesbian play. Considering the setting of this play
is during the AIDS crisis, there is more social and political stigma surrounding their sexuality.
While the audience does not actually see these characters fall in love, one can assume that Leila
feels pressure socially and morally in regards to her lesbian identity. To start the final scene,
Mattis 4
Andrea brings up the Stonewall uprising of 1969, explaining to Leila the importance of their own
intifada, reminding her that they fought for her freedom of sexuality (Khoury 82). Leila struggles
Because Khoury unpacks multiple issues in this play, the audience leaves feeling slightly
overwhelmed while also wanting to learn more. Precious Stones serves as an educational tool to
many since many public schools do not teach content surrounding the Occupation and the
Intifada. The rollercoaster of a relationship between Andrea and Leila directly mirrors the
tension of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from western perceptions. We see the major aspects of
the Occupation and the Intifada, but we do not learn the details or else it would be a four-and-a-
half-hour production. As the two women navigate through their differences it becomes apparent
that some issues appear too important to set aside for each other as they struggle with identity,
Works Cited
of the Israel-Palestine Conflict." The Comparatist, vol. 39 no. 1, 2015, pp. 275-
Khoury, Jamil. Precious Stones. Edited by Dale Heinen. 2003. Pp. 45-86.
Layoun, Mary N. “Middle East Studies Association Bulletin.” Middle East Studies Association
www.jstor.org/stable/23061320.
Mayer, Tamar. Women and the Israeli Occupation: the Politics of Change. Routledge, 1994.
Sharoni, Simona. Gender and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: the Politics of Women's