Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/mseb
Received 28 June 2000; received in revised form 3 July 2000; accepted 15 August 2000
Abstract
The effect of Ni2 + Ti4 + substitution on complex permeability, permittivity and microwave absorption has been studied for
[Ca(NiTi)x Fe12-2x O19]96.0[La2O3]4.0 ferrite–polymer composites, wherein x varies from 0.0 to 1.0 in steps of 0.2, in frequency range
from 8.0 to 12.4 GHz. The ferrite-composites with x \0.0 exhibit significant dispersion in complex permittivity (o%-jo%%) with
maximum value of o%% observed for x=0.6. The dispersion in complex permeability (m%-jm%%) is not significant and is attributed to
the shielding effect of polymer matrix over the ferrite crystallites. The variation of reflection loss has been studied as a function
of frequency ( f ), Ni2 + Ti4 + content (x) and thickness of the absorber. A minimum reflection loss of −30.0 dB is obtained for
composite with x=0.4 and an absorber thickness of 4.15 mm. The experimental values of the matching frequency and the
matching thickness agree well with the theoretical values obtained by solving the equations numerically. © 2000 Elsevier Science
S.A. All rights reserved.
0921-5107/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 5 1 0 7 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 5 1 1 - 0
P. Singh et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B78 (2000) 70–74 71
effective reluctance of the composite thus resulting in the decrease of anisotropy field with increased substitu-
the weak dispersion phenomenon in the spectra of m%% tion of Ni2 + Ti4 + complex [4].
[11]. The relations expressing the resonance – relaxation The comparison of reflection loss measured and cal-
phenomena near the characteristics frequency of spin culated for the composites (x= 0.4) with thickness 4.15
rotation or domain wall displacement are given by mm is shown in Fig. 4. The measured curve is in
Ishino et al. [12]. The effective magnetic spectra of accordance with theoretical calculations. The measured
composites have been described in a model by Slama et curve does not fit exactly on the theoretical curve. The
al. [11] which attempts to predict effective permeability, difference in the measured values is attributed to the
susceptibility of composites by taking into account the reflections caused by the mismatch from various com-
grain and matrix reluctance’s and their dimension ponents of waveguide, the surface irregularity of ab-
parameters. sorbing sample, the gap between the sample and
waveguide dimensions and unstabilized frequency
3.2. Microwa6e absorbing properties source of microwave bench.
In M-type hexagonal ferrite, the substitution of non-
The normalized input impedance of a microwave magnetic ionic complexes lowers the anisotropy field
absorbing layer backed by reflector at the absorber which results in lowering of natural resonance frequen-
surface (Zin) is given by [6]: cies [1]. This also results in decrease of matching fre-
Zin =Zi/Zo = (mr/or)1/2 tanh [j2p/C (mo)1/2 f.d], (1)
where Zi and Zo are the impedances of absorber and
that of free space respectively, m and o are relative
permeability and permittivity of medium, C is the ve-
locity of light in free space, f is the frequency of the
microwave in free space and d is the thickness of an
absorber. The reflection loss is related to Zin as follows:
Reflection loss [dB]=20 log10 ((Zin – 1)/(Zin +1)) (2)
Thus, surface reflectance of an absorber is a function of
six characteristics parameters, e.g. f, d, m%, m%%, o% and o%%.
It is possible to evaluate the numerical values of the
parameters corresponding to the condition of zero
reflection (Zin = 1.0). The values of reflection loss calcu-
lated by using Eqs. 1 – 2 for various measured values of
m%, m%%, o% and o%% is shown in Fig. 3 for composites with
x =0.2, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively. The minimum reflec-
tion point shifts slightly to lower frequencies with in- Fig. 4. The comparison of theoretical and experimentally measured
crease of Ni2 + Ti4 + content, which is consistent with values of reflection loss with frequency.
P. Singh et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B78 (2000) 70–74 73
a= −1/d loge
(a 2 + b 2) (4)