Dilip Gaontarand Henan Lee
Series Ears
[AjinAppadurs, Soe at Luge Cult Dean of lbaeaon
ARJUN APPADURAT
Modernity
at Large
Cultural Dimensions
of GlobalizationThe Production of Locality
‘Ths chapter adses elated questions that have antenna ongoing
res of wri about global earl flow beyin with thee sah ue
tions, What the ace of lca im schemes abot gb ua low
Does amvopoogy retain ay pectoral prvlege ma wold where
locality seems to have lon ns ontlogal moorings? Can the mossy
consiuinverelanonsip berween anthropology and locality survive in 4
Aramately delocalized word iy argument doe 01 stom dictly ome
‘concern with euher the production space (Lelebwe 1991 othe dc
plinry arses of anthopology 2 sch, although they broadly ior
my response (0 these questions Rather, engages 4 continuing debate
about thelr ofthe navon state chap 8) My concern wih what o-
cary might mean i 2 staauon where the sation sae faces partir
Sorta ransationl destabilization
" wew locality as peimaniy relivonl and contextual rather then ay
seaar or saa. set a4 complex phenomenclogiel quali, coma
‘uted by a series of links beoween the ene of oc imeday, the ech
nologies of ineractiny, ad the telavty of contents, Th phenomeno-
logeal quahiy, which expese inet mn certan Kinds of agency. sity,
and eprodciiny, the masn predate of oat a aegary or.
sect) that seek co explore In contrat. |e the tem migra to eer
to the aenllyexsting sol arms im whch lay, a a dines ot
‘aloe ievarablyvesied. Nehborods sm ths sae, se muned
Imunicschaiteraed by chee actualy, whether spaval or va, and
‘hei potenti or socal production”
‘As ato dhe exploration, [address wu rhe questions, Haw des
loan an apes socal ie eae eae subyonive al
fos? I the relasonsip of lecaliy so nxghbovhoudssubnay a-
tere by eee hairy expecially by the wba css ofthe naam sa
‘Asmpler way to caraienze these mull goa 5 hol th as
tion: What can locality mean na wer where pal liclzation, qin
jam eration and socal sal are ot always somorph?
ang the Sb
Tes one of the grand clichés of stl theory gong bk w Toca
Weber and Daher that eaity a3 property or diac of wal le
‘comes undereye n made societies But ality an sheen Irae
social achievement, Even 1 the most incmae. spay conte, ge
fgmpheally soled siuations, lealty must be mamamed cacy
int anus kinds odds. These ods have a vacus nes an plus
been concepnsied diferent Ip many seus, boundaries are zones
of danger requiring spec ual maintenance mothers soe
secu elavons ave iceily Dave, erating 9 psstent enemy er
tem neighborhood dsl. nyt ue statins ecology sre
tology date tht houtes and iahabied spaces are forever ding this
Conelbuing an endeme ene of aeaiy nd maby socal Me
"Much of what we eal the ehnoyrapbse record canbe rewriten aod
‘ered irom this pool view, In heft estance, a reat deal what
have Beer ered iso pas concered wth she produto of what
‘we might al al wet actors who propel Belong to a stated cum
mut tn, aeighbor, ends, and enemies Ceremonies of namin and
fonsur, sanieaton and segregation, circumcision and depevation we
complex socal techniques lor the iscnpuon a fay onto odie.
Looked at sgl fered, they are way ombud locity 25 well ab
to loeate bodies in socially and sptally defined communi, The spa
“symbol o ero psig has probably ben pais auenon shan |
bodily ard socal symbol, Such nes ae not sly mechanical tech
riquc or socal aareytion but soa echagucs or the produc ot
“atv, acategery {have dacusted ehewhere Appa 18)
‘What uit of the produion of clave 6 the sthouaphi‘records as neo he proceses by with loealty ie mately produce
The bling of houses, the atgnstion ot ath nd sage the make
ing ad remaking of tele and dens, she mapping and negation of
‘eamhuran spaces and hunerqatherer tens the incessant, often
hurum preoccupation of many smal communities sued by tah
Pologits. These echniues forthe sual production of lea hove bee
‘copiously documented, Bt sey have not ually been viewed es stances
‘ofthe producion of locality both sa general propery of soil ie and at
2 paral valution of that propery Broken down dererigevely ite
technoiojes fr bouse balding, grden culovtion, andthe lke, these
‘ater outcomes have been taken a ends in themiles rather than at
‘moments ina gener technology (and teleology) of lain.
‘The production of locality i the oceteshsorcally sued by a
thropologists (on islands and in forest, aclu ilies and hunting
amp) i nt simply a matter of producing lca subjects well the
very neighborhoods hat conrestaize shes subject. Ar some he
‘best work i she socal ope of ral un the pai few decides 40 amply
shows (Lewis 1986, Munn 1986, Schein (985), space and tine are
shemeles socialized and lcalaed though complex and deliberate pac
‘ces of perfomance, epresenaton, and action. We hve fended teal
‘hese practices comely or ral terme that by dtscting us rm hee
czive, tenons, and produce ch
sion of mechanical reprodecton
(One ofthe most remarkable general features of he rita proces its
highly specie way a loelnng duration and extension, of wing these
categories nae and properties values and mestngy, spa onde
cer cate the dows impr:
‘bly Avast amoun of what we kaow of rival in sal sale vcietes ean
be revised fromthe pont new The lrg body o ler on tech
ies for naming laces, for protecting fells, animals and other rer
civ spice and esource, or making eaonal henge and alr
shythms, for property stuating new howe and well, Kr appropriately
demareating boundenes (bch donee and communal subatantiiy
erature documenting he sociazatonof pace andtie. Mor presse,
cic aeecord ofthe spatiotemporal production of fcaiy, Looked the
way, Armold van Gennepsexiaardinay andi study of es of passage
(1368), much ol James C. Fazer bizare encylopeia (100), end Bron.
law Malinowskis monumental study of Trobrand garden male (1981)
are subsanally ecorde ofthe myriad ways m which malls fcites
do not and cannot ake local aa given. Rather, they seem sue
that loci ephemeral unless ard and vegular work funder to
The Prodecssen of Lecatity
produc nd mantis tery Yet ths very mer yomesmes
rmstaken forthe terms of such woe, thus abicrny the more aback
eflecs of th work onthe production olay a ance olen
‘Much that hasbeen coneiered los! knowlege ataly heeds
oho to produce and reproduce locaty under condone af ansey an
truropy, scl wear and, ecologies! uncenany and couicvolaiy,
tnd she aways resent qukines of inmen enemies, pints, and guts
tall sors The eal offal knowledge aa only, even manly
tembeciednes in 2 nonnegotable here and now os subborn dsnterest
inching atlage, although thee ate cersily crcl properties as lid
Geertz has reminded usm much of his work (Geers 1975, 1983), Local
knowledge is ubstanclly about preducing relably local sbjct a well
2 about producing relably lees! neighborhoods within which uch
secs canbe recognized and organized In thi ene lea knowles
‘whatt ane peinipaly by conan wih other knowledges—whch rom
Se nonocl point of view) the abierver might regres local zed
but by vite of sla teleology and ethos. We might sy, aden
Many that oa! knowledge nat oly lea in sl bat. even moe
ponant, frisel
renin the smalls ofsoietes, with he hublest of technolpes and
in the mot deslte of ecologies contents, the relaonship between the
production ofloa sabjectsand he neighborhoods in whch such subjects
can be produced named and empowered 0 at ocly aston an
Alecvcalrelssonship, Wrhou reably local subject, the constuction
ofa loca train of habitation, production and moral sect would have
no terete tached ot, Burby the sme foken, without uch known,
named, and negrable eran alrendy aval, the tual echnque or
renting lel subjects would be aberac, thus merle. The long-term
production afs neighborhood that isstultaneousy preci, valed and
taken for granted depends onthe sewnles interaction of locale paces
and times vith loel subjects poseted ofthe knowledge to reproduce
loci Problems that are property hstonclanse whenever the sam
lesness threatened Such problems 60 not arive only with nade,
colonia, or ethnography. Isr this pont now becuse wll ics
‘elow the pecial properties of the production of lca ander he cond
sion of contemporary urban ile, whch involve acon rege, matt
‘mediation, and intense and eg commoditization,
Wa age pct ofthe ethnographic ecard ca be reread and reiten |
record of hermulfaous modes forthe praducion olay fallow
that ethnography has ben uniting compli this ctty Ths
The Preductas of Lacaletypomt about knowledge and represenaton rather thn about gl vo
lence. The eshnoraphe project sna peculiar way somorphe withthe
‘ver kaowledges seeks 0 dsconer and documenta bth the eth
traphic projet an the socal pojecs it see a descbe have the po:
duction of lealiy a the governing els? The marecogation of his
tac in both projec, a ovoinny only more hurum and dices 96
thon and esting thous balding eld narnng, boundary als, gee
ing rival, sata puriason| 1 the consti mrecogntan that
inarancet both the spell appropeateness of elbaogaphy wo cevain
tind of description and specular lock of relay as 8 projet of
knowledge and reproduction. Drown into the very loaliation ty seek
to document, ment ethnographic descriptions have taken localty as
round not igre, recognizing either nor ws ehosasa propery
‘frclie Ths produces an unproblemavzed collaboration withthe sense
finer on which local, a2 statue of feling, ceili relies.
“The vale af econceting ethnography (nd sereading exer ethaog
raphy) from this perspective s teelld. (1) shits the hisory of
‘hnogaphy fom a htory uf aeighhorhoode toa istry ofthe tech
fugues for the production of loa, (2) it opens up a new way chink
thout the complex copraducon of indigenous categories by Oger
telleculs, administer, nga, msionanes and nolopsts, which
Undergnslnge porns of the manoyraphiehiory of anthropology,
(2) st enables the ethnography ofthe modern, and ofthe prdction of
local under madern coneivons, tbe pan ofa more gene conti
fon 1 the etograpie record cut Together, these effets would
help guard asin the too-esty wie ol varus oppositional topes then
and now before date ltd lage, bounded ond unbounded, sable
Se id, hot and cod) hat plcy oppose ehnographies of and inthe
present 1 ethnograghies fad ia she ast.
The Content of aca
| have sol ocuse on loeaty 2 phenomenclageal propery of socal
life smc o eli tht produced by pre formeaf intents]
cuit and that yields parcel sorts a materal lees. Yt shi dimen
Slonl aspect of locality cannot be separated from the ata seingsin and
‘hough whic racial he reproduced To make the link benwen loa,
"et propery o sci Wie and neghborhoods a sacl frm eqs
‘more ciel exposition of the problem ot context The production of
neighborhood slays hstoncally grounded and this cntexul Tha
neighborhoods aresaherenly what they are Bein they ae poe
tosomething cae and derive rom athe, already prada ehh.
In he practical consciouness of may human communes. the me
thing tes oflen conceptualized exolagally av forest or wean
ocean o dese, samp oF er Such ecloyeal Ss often mark bund
et that smulteneousy nal the begins ob numa les ad
‘rego oF recognaably human but barbara or denon ors, Fe
suenty, theie contents, against whch neghborboods ae pode ne
feed rem once scent eal, socal, nd cosmolopeal terns
Teimay be uf hereto note thatthe soil par of the content ol
neihborhoods—the fact, tha of exer acighborhoods—recals the
‘es of vrcie (chap), tem Fused 1 get ay rom the cd chat
troup denies necessary imply that altires need be seen satay
bounded, hitarally unselfeonsius, ethnealy hrogeneis lens
Inch ealer wage, Lampe tht the eso ethno ape might be ent
‘rpecially to the Ite twerh entry, when human ton the vl
iy of mages, snd the consciou entity producing acts of ato
sats lends fundamentally wntable and perspec quay to socal hie
‘Yee neighborhoods ae always fo some extent ethnoscapes, soar 3
they invave the ethnic projects of Othen wean comeouanes ol sth
project Tats partial nevghborhoods someunes recognize ta ther
‘own lie isa eens log by which Oren ao contrac ecgniable,
‘ct human,saated life words, Such krowledgs can be encoded the
bragnatics of rials asacted with clearing lore, making eden.
building houses, which always cay an ple sense ol the tlelogy ol
Joc building In more comple societies, cpa asnsted with
of power ideas, uch knowledges ar coated, a nthe cas ofthe it
ale sociated withthe colonisation of new villages by Hahmans i pe
Colona Tn.
‘Allloclity bang hara moment of colonzaon, 2 moment bh hs
tore and ehonotypi when here i Formal recogntion tht the pro
duccion ofa neighborhood equvesdeiseate, my, even ven action
‘in respect othe sl, forests, amas, and ater human bey. A wood
dal ofthe wolene sbocated with foundstonal nal (Bach 186) +
recognition ofthe force tat requed 10 wrest laity om prewaly
Uuncontoled peoples and pices. Put mother tery (de Carta 196),
the taslomation of spaces into places requres a conscious moment
vehich may subsequently be cemembered ab relatwely routine, The ro
action of neighborhoods inherently colomaing nthe ee that
The Brodectien of Lesssores the assem of rally (oken mally) organized power over
dace: and setting that ae wewed 4 poensallychaote or rebellious
“The ansiery tha sends many real ol habrauon,ocupaion, o ste
iment ra rcogaiton ol she npc waleceo al ch at of colonia
‘son Some of thi asiey remain inthe stu repetition ofthese o-
‘ment, long ater she foundetnal ever of colonization In ths serse the
production of 3 neighborhood is inherenly an exer of power over
Some srt of hole recaletrant environment which may ak he Fem
of another neighborhood.
‘Much of he native mater unearthed by ethnographers working in
small commas well ae mich ofthe description of tal ofa
Calre, howe bulding and social pase, stresies the sheer mater
Fragility etointed with producing and manning laity. Nevertheless,
however deeply such description ss embedded inthe particularities of
pace, sl and al technic nvarably contain or implies» theory
Sf content theory, n aher words, of what eighbehood is produced
Fram, agit net of, and in elton to. The problem ofthe relation
ship benwen neighbashood and context requires mach filler tenon
than canbe alforded here. Let me sketch the general dimensions af ths
problem. The cena emma i tha neighborhoods both av contests
fri atthe sme time require and produce conteats. Neighborhoods are
Contexts the sense shat they provide the frame or eting within which
‘ari knds of human secon raduceve reproductive terete er
Toxmative) eon be intntedand conde nearly, Benue meaning
fa ieswold require legible and reproducible patterns of ction, hey ae
fextlike and tha equ one or many conten From another point of
wre, 2 reighborhod i+ content, oF 3st of conten, within which
‘meavingal soc action canbe both generated ae ierpeted. In chi
‘ve, neighborhoods are context, and contexts 2 neighborhoods. A
neighborhood snug nerve si.
Insofar ar neighborhoods are imagined, produced, and mainained
ina sme orl ground (oil maceil ervarnmental, they alee
ture and produce contents agit whch thew own intl taker
shape. Thi contexe generative dimension of neighborhoods is an impor
‘antmater because provides the begins of theoretical angle on the
relationship between loa and global resives, Hew so? The way i which
Teighborhoods are produced and reproduced requires the contouous
onsrinon, both rst! ad dscusive, ofan ehnoscape (necessary
nonloal agent which ical practices and projects ave imagined to ake
place.
Fhe Pradectias af Lacelety
In one dimension, a one moment, ad rom one penpetne, neh
bochoode senting contexts ae prereqses or the production of oad
sujet. Thats, exiting pices and space, hina stonelyprodoed
{pstemponl neighborhood and with» eco acaed uals 0c
tego, exper practioner, and vlormed aiienes, are requ
toner for new members babes, angen, sve, prisons, gests, thes)
tobe made temporary or permanent local abject, Here, we telex ie
Its tkerfor granted commansensia, habs damenion In tbs denen
sion, neighborhood appears te simply a sto conten, stony
received, mately enbedded, ocly appropiate, naturally unpre
ie fathers yield sons, gardens yield yams, sorcery yee sicnes, ba
rs yield ment, women ye bubs, land yields vemen, shamans yold
‘ions, ad 0 forth. These coments concer appear provide he un
problematzed sing forthe techs! production of local abcess 2
regular and regulated manner
Buta thet local abject engnge nthe sock actvies ol prction,
sepreentation, and reproduction {at the work of culture), they co
true, generly unwittingly, tthe creation of conten that might ex
ceed the exiting matenal and conceal Boundaries ofthe neighbor
hood. Afra epination extend marnage network to new vilges: hing
apeiion eld efnements af what ar undertood to be navigable and
fri water, hasngexpedons extend the Sense ofthe foes 2
spomive ecologies fame, scl eons force new stages o exit and
{ecolnization ding stviies yield new commodity words and thus
ew partnership with yet unencounteredveloral groupings, ware
‘elt new diplomat allancer with previny Hoste ewhbors. And all
ofthe ponies conte to ble his in angunge,werdoe
{hl practice and collective elfundertanding Put summary, loca
ect ery on the coining ask of reproducing ther neighborhood he
Comingencies el history, environment. ad imagination contin the po
tential fornew contents, sc, and imaginative) ob produced
Ines way, trough the vagaries socal ation by loa ube, me
Sorhood as context prodies the context of nexghborhood. Over une.
this dletc changes the conditions ofthe production lca ae sick.
at another way, his i how the subjects of istry become histor sb
ject ao that no human community, however apparently stub, sate,
bounded, or lated can atfly be reunded a cool or ouside hiory
Thi oberon converges with Marshall Shlinss view ofthe dams
of cnjancrural change (1985)
‘Consider he general reliondip among various Yanomam oun"
The reduction 4) Loveitythe run fori of asd aed Venezuls The eatonshp among ste
‘ment, population shits. predatory walt, nd sexaleompetisoncan be
sewed as process in whch specie Yanan villages neighborhood),
ina through ther sons, preoccupations, and sates, actualy pro
«duce a wider eo contents or theives sd ech ther Th creates 2
‘hich any even vilage esponds o a material comet wider than ll
‘ie simultancously conning the ceaton af cht wider content ln
igeracaleperopective, the overall ctor of space and ie in which
the Yenomami produce and generate vecgrcal contents or rece 36
tf locakzaen(vilge building), the produces some of the coments in
‘whch dhe Yanomam aa whole encounter the Bran and Venezuelan
Taton-ete. In this sees, Yenomami locay-producng ace ate
tot only conte dnven but rahe content generative, This tr of all
Toeaiy- producing agus.
“Thun neihborhoods sem paredoniclberzuse they both consute
and equ coments As ethmascapes, neighborhoods wsetbly amply #
‘elton conecwaneto ther neurodes, be they 23 the ame
time a autonomous neighborhoods a tegration value and mater
pact, Thus, ocaluy a3 reltioalacheverent aot the rae ao
aly 35.2 pracocal value nthe quoodian production a sbjet and clo
ization a space. Locality production newly contest generative to
the Felaionships between the contexts tat ehborhoods create and
those they encounter Ths attr} scl power and athe dilerent
teas of argantnn and conrl win which pra sces (nd
places) are embedded,
‘Although the pracuce nd proc ol she Vanomar ae conten
dicing forthe Bron sae tw even tur that dhe pacts ofthe
Brazian naionatinvolve han, ven ovcrvhelming ore of lary
Imtavention, geil envronmentl explosion, ad sateponsored
Imagravon and colometion tha the Yanomans corns gn bagel un
pal terms nhs seme, wh | wl poraue i he nest secon onthe
conditions of loeaty producuon va the eof the naomi, the
anomam are beng sen dla un he seme ol encaved, elie
eapr even cleaned the context ol the Bealan polity Ths, whe
they ar sli a postion to generate contents a they produce snd repr
duce thrown neighborhooss, thy are increasingly prisoners nthe con
texeproduing aovites af the aatontate, which makes thir own
tors to produce locality seem feeble even doomed
“Ths example has wide yeneralappabity The eapabty of neg
bothoods to produce cones wrthin which their ery Toelzng oct
ses acquire meaning and hier potemtal anda produce lal bets
‘sprooundly aed bythe locality producing capable ol larger sale
social formations nation sats, Kingdoms, missionary empires, and a
ing cats) to determine the general shape of all she newhborhods
‘within the reach of thei ower Ths, power i abeys key etre o
the conte elation of neighbarods, nd evn" contac sleays
involves dillerentraratives of res rom the wo sieved i
“The pall ecnomy tht links neighborhoods to ontets 6th
both methodolopealy aad historically complex. Oude of conto de
‘ve largely from linguists. Uns recen contest is been opportuni
cally died 19 make sense of speci sentenes, sta, pertornances,
and other sore of ext. While the production ol texts has been cacy
considered fom several difleren point ol view Bauman nd Bega 19%,
Hanks 1989), ce sracture and morphology of contexts as oly ate be
come the foro ny systematic tension [Durant and Goodwin 1992)
Beyond anthropological linguistic, context remains poorly defined idea
inert concept indexing an inet etronment When social snthropalo
sss appeal co content i genet looely understood sense athe
social rae within which specie actions or representation ean best Be
tndertood Sociolinguistics, especially as derived from the cthnoerphy
of speaking (Himes 1974, hasbeen the min source fr shi general
proach,
The structure af ontets cannot and should not be denned ently
from thelogicand morphology of tents. Textprodiction and context ro
duction have diferent logis and metpragmatc fates Contens are
produced nthe complex mbestin of dcueve od nanducnive pte
ces, ands the sense in which ont imply other contents, sth each
context plies global network of contests, diflerent om he sense
thick tents imply other texts and event all ets. Interentalrel
ions, about which we now nwa fr amount, are not key to work in
the sume way as mtconeral elavons. Lax, ad most daunting the
prospect that we shal have find way oconnes theories of imenox
ality to theories of intercotexliy. A stony theory of lobakeaton
from a sociocultural point of ww is ikely to require romething we ce:
tiny do not now have: theory of intercontexta lations hat score
‘ates our exiting sense of teens, Buca tly anther project
The relaionship between neighborhood ss conser andthe cane
reighborhoods, mediated by the action of loc! historia subjecs, =
The Predectos of beselityques new complexes nthe orto world which we now veka ths
ew sort of word, the preducton ol neighborhoods ceasing oces
under condone where the sytem fran tess the normative hinge
forthe production of bot oa and walcal activites, Tis suation in
hich the power elton that et the roducon of och ae nde
mentally asl, the exnrlconcem a he net section.
The Gil Pads of ality
What hat been dacuned thu fara 3 swe problems lcaty
and neighborhoods, text and context, enoicapes an ieworde) aes
row to be expliclyhstoncise. | ave sniested sendy thatthe el
‘onship af oeslty (and newghborhoods) to context stra and
ecu and bathe contest generative mension of pcs (in ther a
pacity 2s thrascpes) dint rom ther content providing features Gin
theicapscty as neighborhoods, Haw de thee cam help ro understand
what happens to the production of localay nthe contemporary wore?
‘Contemporary undestanding of lbslztion alia and Wallen
191, Fethentone 1990, King 1991, Roberton 1952, Roxenau 1990)
seem 0 india ashlar an emphast o the gla ouneys of ap
fait moder of thought and organization to somewhat dillrent empha-
Sis on the spread of the nanon Form, especialy a8 diated bythe con
‘urentsted ol colaniahim and print capralsm H one problem now
appears be the dominant concer he human ence, tha fh
‘onalsm andthe aauon state (Andenon 1991, Bhabha 1990, Chaceree
1986, 1993, Calne 983, Hobabawr 1990)
‘Wie ont me wil el whethr oe errr presecupsions with the
rations ae ste, the begonmgs of an anhvopelogeal engage
iment with hs soe are eden the ncrsengcontbaton of ahve
polos tothe problemas othe aston state (Borneman 1992, Moore
1993, Handler 1988, Herzfeld 1982, Ksperer 1988, Tab 1986, Ubon
and Sheer 191, van der Veer 1984) Some ofthis work explty com
Sides he global context of rational ull formations Homer: 1982,
Basch et al 1994, Foste 1991, Fredy 1990, Capt nd erpson 192,
Rouse 1991, Sable 1992). Yet emework or elaung the global, the
ational, and the local ha et oemerge
In this ston, | hope to extend my thought about oa abject ad
localized contests o sketch the sulin on agument about she spec
problems that bese: the production of lcaty sna world hat hs become
eterntonaized Deleuze ord Gata 1871, daspon, ad vasnation!
“This » wold where electron med ste tanning the elaine
between information and medatn, fd where nanonsaen at sag
sling 0 rein contol over the pepsltons the lew ol ht
‘national nd asnationl movertets sid onganiauons A allcomdra
"on ofthe challenges tothe production of kxalay in such a ward would
require extended treatment beyond the scope of tha chapter a some
‘elements of an approach this problem can be culined
Put simply, the tak of producing lcaliy as sna ol lek 8
prope of sci il, and an cology of usted communis) res
lnaly #sevggle: There are many denensons to ths strug, and I hall
focus here on three) he steady increase ithe ellos the men na
Sion sate 1 defn all neighborhoods under the sg of storms fle
_Bance and sfilntion, (2) the growing uncut Beowen ery, so.
Jectiy and collective sail movement, and (3) the steady conan
rneply duet the force and form of lecture mean, the ea
‘omhip Between spat and viral seihbochoods. To make things yet
‘mor complex, thee thre desing ae themselves interactive
‘The nation-state rele for ts legtimacy onthe vent of is wean
‘nel presence n a continuous body of bounded terry It work By
polling i borders, producing is people (Eaibar 199), consrctng
tens, defining its capitals, monuments, cies, waters and soya by
onsracing locales of memary end commemoration, sch as pave
‘yarsand cencraphs, mausoleum nd mascums Te ation tte ont
"hrowghout ts errs he barely contiiry projet ol ceang
As, contiguous, and homogeneaus pace of mationnes and snulancasy
4 set of places ad sacs (pros, rks, sun ads stony ee,
"arias, parks, marching grounds, procenaral ote) caked to eat
‘he ntera ditincins and dvssons neces) fr vat ceemony, are
lance, disciine, and mabation. These Inter ae alo the Spey and
places that create ae perpewatethe dictions besween ler an ale
‘minal and officals, crowds and leader, acon and ube
“Through apparatuses a diverse a museums and wile dpensines,
ost ofces and police sutton, tolboohs and ielephone boot the na
on-state creatsa vast network of formal nd normal echngue forthe
nationalization ofall space considered o be unde Is sovereign auton
States vary, of cous, in thee ality to pence she noks and erties
of everyday ie. Subvenion, evation, and estan, smetinessatlop
«al (Mbembe 1992), sometmes ion (Camaro snd Comal! 19320,
sometimes cover (Scott 1990), sometimes spontaneous and noma
Panne, ae very widespread, nec the nes ol natn ties os coe
The Pradastine of Localitytain ard define the Ives ol ther cient are wt lange inthe growth of
Shadow economies, pete and qua -prvate armies nd consuls,
secesonary rations, and 3 vancty of nongovernmental organi
instar provide alternanves tothe national conta ofthe meas of sub
‘tater vary at wll inthe nature and extent of ther ters in ea Me
td the eal ons ia which they vest thee deepest gaara of 0
‘eianry and coal Spting onthe set very dangerous in Singapore
and Papua New Guinea; public gatherings ae a problem in Hai and
Cameroon, diespct fo the emperors not good in Japan, ad ineting
10" Muslim sentiments cba news comtemporary Ini, The it could
bbemulipied:nationstterhave he spec ste of sacredness, he spe-
al tes of loyalty apd weachery, the speci mesures of compliance
tnd dsr. These ar inked el and perceived probes of wee
ress, reigning delogies of liberizatn oF pest, eltve commit
‘rents oincermations respectability vray deep revlon about mm
late predecessor regimes, and specal stones of ethnic aagonsm or
coltboration. Whatever cs te othe wo after 1989, there do nt
‘eem tobe any very eableinks Between sate deoogies of wel, mar
et economies itary power, and etic puri. Yet whether one consid:
cer the ubulent post Communst societies o Easter Europe, the gars
tive estates of the Far East (sich as Taoran, Singapore, and Hoag
Kong), the complex postmitary pales of Lan Amerie, the Bankrpt
seme economie of uch of su Saharan Alc, othe able anda
nena sttes of much ofthe Mid East and South Ai, they appear to
pore rather sil se of challenges co the production of neighborhood
by loca sbjee.
From the post of view of madern ravonais, neighborhoods exist
principally 10 incubate and reproduce complint national cient
not foe the production of local subjects. Locality fo the modern nation
state isethera site ofnatonallyapproprated nostalgs, celebrations, and
Eommemorations ora neesany condition of the pradacion of ational
Neighborhoods a social fomacions represent anwetis for the naon
sat, as they usualy conan argeo eid pacer whece he techie
ff matonhood (bith con, lingu uniformity, economic dsiglne,
‘communications efciency, and politcal loyalty) are likely to be ether
sweakorconterted. At the tame tine, ne ghborhood a the source ol po
lca workers and party alia, teacher and sles, teerison vec
‘cansand producve farmers. Nghbothoods ae not dspenable even
they ae potentially tracherun For the projec of the ation state nigh
The Pradestias of Lecelsty
bothoods representa perennial surce ol etry andlppage Uy el
tobe policed almost thoroughly a borden
“The work of producing nexhbochoods Me work cartuaed by
reatney able asocitons, by reltvely hnowe and shared hires
fn by csllecively traversed and legible spaces and places ten at
swith he rote othe nation-state Ths pany beause the com
tmitments and wachmen sometincssabeedpnmorda | ha char
rear lool subjects are more presing, more comtiuows, and some
times more dating than the aon state ca ford I ako beac
the memoresandactachmens hat oal subjects hae of and to thee sop
Signs and street nares thst fvonte wallways and streetscapes, thee
times and places for congregating and escaping ae ten at odds wih che
needs ofthe nation-state for eeultd public hte. Farther, the nacre
OToa if o develop payin conta. ooiereeghborbooss, by po
thcing its own cones of aleriy (spat socal and echnical), cones
that my not meet the need or pata and sea standbdiation that
prerequisite forthe daipined national tizen
‘Neighborhoods are idealy rages lor thie ove selheepoduction. 3
proces hat fundamentally opponed tothe smayinary of the nat
State, where neighborhoods are dese tbe instances and exenpl o
2 gereralable mode of belonging f0 3 wader wertnal tmagnary The
modes ofIelzaton most congenil the aation state havea ds
ary aaliy about them in saraton and ret leaning, prson nd
Slam Gearance,n refugee camps and oer of ever kin, the natonstate
localizes by fut, by decree andsometines by the over wea ore Tho
ter of location center severe const, even det obstees, she
‘sovival of lcaliey tr context generative rather shan a contexdaven
proces.
"Yet the isomorphism of people, terror, and legimate soverenty
hac constuer the normative char o the modern ration wate ell
under threat rm the fome of cilton of people characters the
‘contemporary world Iie now widely conceded that human motions
frie of oc fe more often thin tis excepuona ia ar contemporary
‘wold, Work, both ofthe most sphistnted intelectual sort and of the
‘most humble proletarian sort, dives people o migate, often more than
‘once in theiifetimes, The police o tonnes, particule vward
populations regarded as poventally subversive, ceae 2 peypeal movon
Imachine, wher eugee From one maton move another, resting net
Instablie there tht eave further sacl unrest and chs futher soc
cit, Thus, che people production needs ol one ravionsiate eat meanrhe and socal unrest far neighbor, creating open-ended eyes of
‘che cletoung, ed myraton,xenophoba, sate pran,aed
ther ete cleaning Eastern Europe eer and Boss Herzegovina
vn pariclar are petops the most agi and complex examples of sch
statererugee domino process. In many such as, people and whole
‘ommuniter ar tuned int eto, figs camps, concentration eps,
orresevations sometimes without anyane mong sal
‘Other forms of human movement are cette bythe rai o ie of
economic oppor, the rue a much Avan matin othe och
Fara the Miele Est. Yr oe arm o movement ar crested by per
‘manealy mobile group species workers (Unie Nations oer,
cil techlogs, development pili and yell labore). Sil
oer fons of movenent, particulary in sub Sharan Aa, involve
major rough ad famines, often ued wo sso liancerberween cor
Tupt sates and opportnetc weerationl and global agencies. In yet
oxer communis, te loge af moverent provided bythe lest in
fisnes, which crente tourists snd lacatns around the word. The
tchnogapy of these ours oetion: at beaming 2 be wren bo
sera but wha nl we do know suet that many such ean rate
omplex conditions or the production and rproduenon of acl, in
which ues of marraye, work, busines and lesre weave together vaour
Circulating popsltons with kinds ot locals crete aeghborhoods tat
belong in one ene to pata natin-tts, but tha re rm another
point wew what we might all tauiaalin The challenge 10 producing
neighborhood i thet sens devs Hor the ihren inal
focal relationships, the power tendency tor laa abject el to
be commodiuized nd the tendenics for nsvonstates, which tometinet
bin ngnicant venus fom ch es, eave stella yan
‘through externally imposed nodes of elation credential n, ad
sage prodcton,
'A much darker version a dhe rable of producing 3 aeghborhood
«canbe seen in she gus permanent eter camp ha now characte
‘many embatled part ofthe worl, sich as the Ocepied Terrie in
Palen, the camp onthe Tholund:Cambods bade, the any United
Nawons crgonaed carps in Somalia, andthe Athan ehgee camps in
Norwest Pakan. Combining the wort eatues of urban sums, con
eurauon cap, prisons, end whee, there re places where, nonthe
les, marsages ae omiaced and celebrated, hve ate begun and ended,
social eon made and honored, carer Inunched and broken, money
trade and spent, youth produced and exchanged. Such rehee comps af
the sakes examples ol the condos of uncertany. poverty, dspace
ren and despairunder which localuy canbe produced These ae the ek
treme examples of neighborhoods shat ae context produced ater than
context genertive. These we neighborhoods whose hlewords oe pr
‘ced nthe direst circstancs, with poson and concentration camps
beng ther most babar examples
‘Ye even these brutal examples only push ean enreme the quovdian
“thor of many cites Inthe conden of ethic unrest and ub ware
that chastenze ene such Bellas and Los Angeles, Amedabod and
Saree, Mogadishu and Johaonesbur, urban zones ar becoming armed
cap, diven wholly by nls res (chap. 7) tat lta neighbor:
hoode the mot wolent and problematic repercasons of wider ewan
rations, and slab processes, There a, of couse, many porn
ferences bene these es, their stores, ther populations and thee
cultura polis. Yer together they represen 2 new page i the ie ot
‘ities, where the concentration of ethnic populations, te avalabliy at
heavy weapon and the crowded condition of civic Me create turat
forms of warfare (rmuniscet of Rie ike Raa! Warr, Bie Ruse, 20d
many other), ad where 3 genera desolation ol the national and ylbal
landscape as wransposed many barr aca eyous, and gst en
ines no sean of relieve wba eon
“These new urban wart hve became o sme extent dvrced rom her
sswiona and tonal eclope and ned into rel ropling, mplosive
swam between crimis|, prema, and evan mas, ved w obscure
‘ays to tansnntiona lio, economic, and political forces. There ae
of eoue many carer forthee forms urban breakdown nthe Fist nd
‘Third Wore, bot npr they ae det the ead erosion ofthe ca
bil of uch cite to control the mens of ther own sllreproducton.
1 dese not to essoctessgncant part of thee probers withthe
sheer ecalion of person, tena a est of ware, tavaton, nd
‘hic leamsng, chat dives people nto such cites nthe st lace, The
brodton of cay in hese urban fooatine acs the related problems
of placed and deteitriaized populations of sae policies that rexrt
neighborhoods as context producers, and of oeal subjects who canna be
nything other han cational cise nthe most hah ces, such neg
bothaods hardly deserve the name anymore, given that dey ae barely
rote than stages, holding companies tes, an barks for populions
‘eh dangerouy thin commitment othe redaction of locality
Last hi ee too dark vison tight be aed that the very tre
ofthese les pleasant urban dramas drives inde and wre to mare
The Predestoas of Leselitypeace locavons wher they are willing brng tv wit kl, and pas
son for peace. The best moment fu ie in che Uned States and
Europe ae owed to these migrants who are feng ples lar won than
CChiago, Deer, Los Angles, and Mant Yet we know thatthe rode
ton of aly in South-Cental Las Anges, on Chagos West Sie, and
‘n sila ar of age Amencen ces highly embaled proce
“The thud and final factor to be adresse here w the fle of matt
media, expecily in ts electone lrms, in creating new or of dune
tar Between spaal and vital eghborhoods Thi dayne as both
uopan and dystopian pote, and there ino easy way tell how
these might play themselves out n regard 10 the ue ofthe production
collect. For one thing, the eletone media themselves now vary inter
sully and constitutes complex fay of technolopeal mens for prod.
tng 2nd dsstminating news and entrainment Fil tends to be dom
sated by major commercial interes in 3 lew work centers (Hollywood,
[New York, Hong Kong, Bombay, skhouh major secondary sits for com
‘mercial cinema are emerging in ether part of Europe, Asa and Ade
(sucha Meco City, Bangkok, and hart) At cinema (pay bul on 9
ving transnational network of mess, exons, and commer
esl auction) i pred both more broadly snd more shiny crore the
‘wold but rossover Him uch as Rear Daj, Tein Ga 3 well
Sala Boab ad El aac) aon the nea
Televison both nt convention! brodent forme a well as hough
ew fons of aeite hookup, nce leaploge the pub paces of
ima viewing ad comes nt lors o ntenae often i the poorest
shuns of the word suchas those of Rio de ane and Sto Polo. The
relationship betwee ils viewing i theatre and on videoaueis in
lomesi seins itself rests very import changer, which have Been
sngucd co sanal the end of cinema viewing 3 3c form of specter.
ship (Hanser 1991) Asthesame tine, the avalabilty of deo-production
technologie 10 small communes, semecmee nthe Four Worl, has
made i possible for these commanties to create ore effective national
and global steps of ell epesenction and curl survival (Cian
193, Tuer 1992). Fax machines, electron mal and ether forms of
‘ompuermediated communsation hive created new pose for
‘ransrational forms of communition, tn bypsting the ntrmedie
sarvllance ofthe nation state and of maormeda canglmeates Eachof
these developments, of ours, steric with the eters rating compl
‘ated new connections beeen producers, audiences, nd publics aca
ind nutioral, sable and darpoce
lei mposubleo yr through thn Belden plethr of change st
the medi environments tht stround the product ol reahbortoods
ue there ae numerous new forms of eormunty and communication a
cently lect the eapbilty of neighborhoods tebe context prune
athe than lvaly context aven The muchdscaied pac of
From cx nd he sme loal and weananeous forms of medion
2 well the roe of tox technologies nthe democratic uphenas in
Chins, Este Bucope an the Soviet Urion in 1989 (and since! have
‘mide it posible both or lexders and nonstate, well athe vanoun
‘pposinonal force, to communtate very api aos local and even
Sonal nes. The speedo uch communication father eamplted by
the grow of electronic billboard communis, sich a shone eabled
bythe Interne, which allow debut, logue and lauonship balding
song varius eto divide nda, who nevertlee are form:
ing communities of emapination an nterest tht ae geared to thee das
‘onc poston and voces
“These new forms ol lectoncly mediated communication ae be
sing to create val gids longer bounded by terry, pas
bons, aes, elections and other conventional plc dices, but by
ecat o both the sofware and hardware that ae requred ts cone (0
thes lige nteratloal compar networks. Thus far, 2cces to these
nal (electronic) neighborhoods tends tobe conned fo members ol the
Transnationa negen, who, through ther access vo computer ech
rologies at univers, Ib, and Vian, can ase socal and polial
project on teemnloyies contacted wo salve nfonaton-ow problems
Information and opinion Now concurenty chou thew creas, and
wie the soc morphology’ ol thee electron neighborhoods shard to
asy and hei longed pret, len the ae commun
‘ies of ome sor, trading oforation and balding ink tha aet many
areas of fe, From plantropyYomarrage
“Thete virtual scighborhoods sccm on the face of 110 represent nt
hat abienee of cette links, patil contig, and mul soc
‘eweracton tht the ds ofa neighborhood veems cenlly comply Yet
‘we mast rot be woo quick o oppose hathlyspaaleed neighborhoods to
these vimut eighborhoods of itematonsl electronic commacation
‘The relationship beaween thee evo forms of neighbedhood is cane.
ably more complex Inthe fit innance, she via! neihborhood are
eto mobilize ideas, opinions, money, nd socal kas that end
recy flow back inte ved neighborhood nthe form of eumency Hows
ams for lol nationalisms and support or vans possions i highly bo‘alzed pb spheres. Thus, nthe context the desrction ol she Baba
‘Masi in Ayodhya by Hinds exsemats on 6 December 1982, there was
mn ntense mobilization of computer a, and eked electronic network,
‘which erated very rp loops of debate and information exchange be.
‘een interested persons in he Und States, Canad, England ad var
‘ous pan of Indi, These electonc Lops have been exploited equally by
Indias inthe United Site sanding on both sds ofthe wrest debate
‘ove undamenalism and communal harmony in comtemporary India.
Arthe sme time, continuing with the example of he ldian comm
‘iy overseas, both the progressive, secular groupings and thei counter.
arts onthe Hind revivalists (embers ofthe Vw Finds Pash
and sympathizers ofthe Bharti Janat Party andthe Bajrang Da, some:
times refed to asthe Sangh rer or family) are oblzng these i
‘neighborhoods inthe meres of polite rots tht are intensely oes
Fang in India The nots tha shook many lain cts alter 6 December
1992 can no longer be viewed in wolton Irom the electronic mili
"on ofthe Indian easpoa, whose members can now be invelved dey
in these developments in India through electronic meas, This snot en
trey a matter of long-distance nationalism ofthe sor tat Benedict An