Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0195-6663(16)30045-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.010
Reference: APPET 2862
Please cite this article as: Crichton G.E., Elias M.F. & Alkerwi A.’a, Chocolate intake is associated
with better cognitive function: the Maine-Syracuse Longitudinal Study, Appetite (2016), doi: 10.1016/
j.appet.2016.02.010.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Chocolate intake is associated with better cognitive function: the
PT
5
a
6 Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia;
RI
7 Email: georgina.crichton@ unisa.edu.au
b
8 Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA; Email:
SC
9 mfelias@maine.edu
U
c
10 Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono,
AN
11 Maine, USA
d
12 Luxembourg Institute of Health L.I.H. (formerly Centre de Recherche Public-Santé),
M
15
TE
*
16 Corresponding author:
EP
17 Georgina Crichton
21 Adelaide
23 AUSTRALIA
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
27 Abstract
28 Chocolate and cocoa flavanols have been associated with improvements in a range of health
29 complaints dating from ancient times, and has established cardiovascular benefits. Less is
30 known about the effects of chocolate on neurocognition and behavior. The aim of this study
PT
31 was to investigate whether chocolate intake was associated with cognitive function, with
RI
32 adjustment for cardiovascular, lifestyle and dietary factors. Cross-sectional analyses were
33 undertaken on 968 community-dwelling participants, aged 23-98 years, from the Maine-
SC
34 Syracuse Longitudinal Study (MSLS). Habitual chocolate intake was related to cognitive
36
U
chocolate consumption was significantly associated with better performance on the Global
AN
37 Composite score, Visual-Spatial Memory and Organization, Working Memory, Scanning and
M
38 Tracking, Abstract Reasoning, and the Mini-Mental State Examination. With the exception of
39 Working Memory, these relations were not attenuated with statistical control for
D
41 between cognitive function and chocolate intake measured up to 18 years later. Further
42 intervention trials and longitudinal studies are needed to explore relations between chocolate,
EP
44
AC
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
46 Introduction
47 Chocolate consumption is widespread throughout the world. In 2009, 7.2 million tons of
48 chocolate was consumed worldwide [1]. Commonly associated with pleasure and enjoyment,
49 chocolate is a frequently ‘craved’ food [2-4], possibly due to its rich natural complexity [5].
50 The sweet taste, high carbohydrate and fat content and highly palatable orosensory qualities,
PT
51 obtained from its specific constituents, may all contribute to its appeal as a ‘comfort’ food.
RI
52 Few other natural products have been purported to have as many medicinal benefits as
53 chocolate. From very early times to the present day, chocolate has been used to reduce fever,
SC
54 treat childhood diarrhoea, promote strength before sexual conquests, decrease ‘female
55 complaints’, increase breast-milk production, encourage sleep and to clean teeth [5]. More
U
AN
56 recent scientific interest has been directed at the cardiovascular [6, 7] and neurocognitive
57 benefits [8, 9] derived from chocolate and cocoa consumption. The cardiovascular benefits
M
58 have been well established from dietary intervention trials showing improvements in insulin
59 sensitivity [10], blood pressure [10], endothelial function [11, 12] and cerebral blood flow
D
60 [13]. In contrast to the evidenced-based benefits from cocoa and chocolate consumption on
TE
61 cardiovascular health, the precise impact of chocolate on human cognitive function is less
62 clear.
EP
64 including memory and processing speed. In the absence of effective treatments for
AC
66 decline may contribute significantly towards optimising cognitive functioning across the
67 adult life-span [14-19]. The ability of flavonoid-rich foods to improve cognitive function has
68 been demonstrated in both epidemiological studies [20, 21] and clinical trials [22].
69 Chocolate and cocoa products are a rich source of flavonoids. Flavanoids, naturally
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
71 compounds present in cocoa beans [9]. Flavanols, and in particular epicatechin, are a
72 subgroup of flavonoids, and are the most common cocoa flavonoids [9]. High levels of
73 flavanols are also found in tea, red wine, and fruits such as grapes and apples [23]. In addition
75 caffeine and theobromine, both of which have been associated with improving alertness and
PT
76 cognitive function [24, 25]. The amount of cocoa in chocolate ranges from approximately 7-
RI
77 15% in milk chocolate, to 30-70% in dark chocolate. One hundred grams of dark chocolate
SC
79 without meythlxanthines can contain up to 250 mg of flavanols [26].
81
U
following a single dose of chocolate or cocoa flavanols [27, 28]. Benefits to information
AN
82 processing speed and working memory were observed in these studies within hours of
M
83 consuming cocoa flavanols or dark chocolate. Less research has examined the effects from
84 the longer-term consumption of chocolate or cocoa. One recent randomized controlled trial,
D
85 the Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) Study, has provided evidence that daily
TE
87 individuals [29]. Consistent with the immediate effect studies [27, 28], improvements in
EP
88 processing speed and attentional tasks were seen following 8-weeks of consuming an
C
91 administration of chocolate or cocoa flavanols, ranging from 5 days to 6 weeks, have failed to
92 find any positive effects on cognition [30-32]. It is possible that the variability in the flavanol
93 content in chocolate, which may vary according to the bean variety, origin and manufacturing
94 processes, may contribute to the mixed outcomes observed in studies to date on the effects of
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
96 We have not identified any cohort studies that have examined associations between
98 functioning measures. The existing evidence remains limited and inconclusive. Using data
99 collected from participants in the Maine-Syracuse Longitudinal Study (MSLS), the aim of the
100 present study was to determine whether habitual chocolate intake is associated with improved
PT
101 cognitive function, with consideration given to cardiovascular, lifestyle and dietary factors.
RI
102
SC
104 Participants
105 The MSLS was a community-based study of cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive
U
AN
106 functioning in adults [33-36]. The MSLS consists of five cohorts defined by time of entry
107 into the study (1975-2000, see Appendix 1). At initial recruitment, participants were living
M
108 independently in Syracuse, New York State. Participants in the present study were those
109 returning for the sixth study wave (2001-2006), as dietary intake measures and extensive data
D
110 on risk factors for CVD were first obtained at wave 6. From a sample of 1049 individuals,
TE
111 participants were excluded for the following reasons: missing dietary or cognitive data
112 (n=38), acute stroke (n=28), probable dementia (n=8), undertaking dialysis treatment (n=5),
EP
113 inability to read English (n=1), and prior alcohol abuse (n=1), leaving 968 participants.
C
114 Dementia cases were excluded as we were interested in examining relationships between diet
AC
115 and cognitive performance in those without severe cognitive impairment because poorer
116 cognitive performance in such individuals is a major risk factor for dementia [37, 38] and
117 Alzheimer’s Disease [39]. The clinical diagnosis of dementia was determined by committee
118 using the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and
120 MSLS cognition data, diagnostic records and medical interview data [40]. Stroke was
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
121 defined as a focal neurological deficit of acute onset persisting for more than 24 hours, and
123 This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of
124 Helsinki and all procedures were approved by the University of Maine Institutional Review
125 Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
PT
126
RI
127 Procedure and Assessment
128 Dietary Intake Dietary intake was also assessed using the Nutrition and Health
SC
129 Questionnaire [41, 42]. Participants were required to stipulate how frequently they consume a
130 list of foods, including meat, fish, eggs, breads, cereals, rice and pasta, fruit, vegetables, dairy
131
U
foods, chocolate, nuts, other snack-type foods and beverages, including tea, coffee, water,
AN
132 fruit juice and alcohol. Participants were required to stipulate how frequently they consumed
M
133 each food, from six response options: never, seldom, once/week, 2-4 times/week, 5-6
134 times/week, and once or more per day. Chocolate was not differentiated according to type, ie.
D
136 In order to estimate mean intake of the major food groups and total energy intake, the
137 median score within each response option was used to estimate total intake per week; for
EP
138 example, 2-3 times per week was estimated at 2.5. The mean number of times each food was
C
139 consumed on a weekly and then daily basis was calculated for all foods in the questionnaire.
AC
140 Because portion sizes were not stipulated to participants, these totals are an estimate of the
141 number of times each food was consumed on a daily basis. Individual foods were categorised
142 into five major food groups - grains, fruits, vegetables, protein foods, and dairy foods - based
143 on the USDA Food Guide Pyramid [43]. Intake of individual foods and beverages within
144 each food group were summed to give an estimate of total intake for each group. An
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
145 estimation of total energy intake was calculated by adding intake of all food groups, and was
147
148 Cognitive Function Cognitive function was assessed using the MSLS neuropsychological
149 test battery, which has been used in numerous health and cognition studies [33-36, 44]. The
PT
150 following composite scores have been previously derived using factor analysis from 20
RI
151 individual tests designed to measure a wide range of cognitive domains: visual-spatial
152 memory and organization, scanning and tracking, verbal episodic memory, and working
SC
153 memory. The WAIS Similarities Test [45], a measure of abstract reasoning, loaded on all
154 composite scores (factors) and was thus employed separately. A global cognition composite
155
U
score was derived by averaging the z-scores for all individual tests and then re-standardizing
AN
156 these scores to obtain a z-score with a mean of zero and SD of 1.00. In addition, the Mini-
M
157 Mental State Examination (MMSE) [46], a global measure of mental status widely used in
158 the literature, was included in the MSLS battery. The derivation of these composites has been
D
159 described previously [35] and they have been repeatedly utilized in MSLS studies. All
TE
160 cognitive performance measures are expressed in the same unit of measurement (SD units),
162
C
163 Demographics and Physical Health Assessment Demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle
AC
164 characteristics were obtained from the Nutrition and Health Questionnaire [41, 42]. Data
165 obtained included smoking history, marital status and medical history. Physical activity was
166 measured with the Nurses’ Health Study Activity Questionnaire, a validated measure of time
167 spent engaging in various physical activities [47]. The Center for Epidemiological Studies
168 Depression Scale (CES-D) [48] was used to assess depressive symptoms. Education level
169 was obtained through self-report (mean = 14.7 ± 2.7 years, range 4-20 years).
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
170 Standard assay methods were employed [35] to obtain fasting plasma glucose
171 (mg/dL), total cholesterol (TC, mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL, mg/dL),
172 high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL, mg/dL), triglycerides (mg/dL) and C-reactive
173 protein (CRP, mg/L), following an overnight fast. Body weight was measured with
174 participants wearing light clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg, and height was measured with a
PT
175 vertical ruler to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in
RI
176 kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Waist circumference (in centimetres) was
177 taken over light clothing, using a non-extendable measuring tape, at the level of the iliac
SC
178 crest. Automated blood pressure measures (GE DINAMAP 100DPC-120XEN, GE
179 Healthcare) were taken in the right arm five times each in recumbent, standing and sitting
180
U
position after a supine rest for 15 minutes, and averaged for systolic and diastolic blood
AN
181 pressure. Obesity was defined as having BMI of at least 30 kg/m2.
M
182
184 Participant demographics, health and dietary variables, and cognitive scores were compared
TE
186 samples t-tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square for categorical variables.
EP
187 For the primary analyse, chocolate intake was further classified into three intake
C
188 groups based on self-reported frequency of consumption: less than once per week, once per
AC
189 week, and more than once per week. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) (a step-
190 down protection procedure) [49] was used to examine relationships between chocolate intake
191 and cognitive performance (Visual-Spatial Memory and Organization, Scanning and
192 Tracking, Verbal Episodic Memory, Working Memory, Similarities, MMSE). All cognitive
193 outcomes were entered into the analyses simultaneously as dependent variables except for the
194 Global Composite score, as the Global Composite is co-dependent on all the measures other
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
195 than the MMSE. Multivariate ANOVA was used to examine relationships between chocolate
196 intake and the Global Composite. In addition to MANOVA, the Bonferroni procedure was
198 Potential confounding factors were identified on the basis of two criteria: (1) had to be
199 theoretically relevant [50] and, (2) had to show a statistically significant association (p<0.05)
PT
200 with both chocolate intake and the Global Composite. Three covariate sets were used:
RI
201 (1) Covariate set 1: age, sex
202 (2) Covariate set 2: age, sex, education, total cholesterol, glucose, LDL-cholesterol,
SC
203 hypertension, estimated energy intake (total daily intake of all food groups as previously
204 described).
205
U
(3) Covariate set 3: covariate sets 1 and 2, plus dietary intake of alcohol, meats, vegetables,
AN
206 and dairy foods.
M
207 The other risk factors measured as potential covariates did not correlate significantly with
208 chocolate consumption (predictor) or an outcome measure and therefore were not included in
D
210 All statistical analyses were performed with PASW for Windows® version 21.0
211 software (formerly SPSS Statistics Inc. Chicago, IL, USA); P< 0.05 was considered
EP
213
AC
214 Results
216 Table 1 shows the demographic and health-related variables, cognitive scores, and dietary
217 intake for MSLS participants (n=968), according to chocolate consumption (those who
218 consume chocolate never or rarely, compared with at least once per week). Effect sizes are
219 shown for those variables where there were significant differences between groups (p<0.05).
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
220 Women ate chocolate more frequently than men. Compared to those who never or rarely ate
221 chocolate, those who ate chocolate on a weekly basis, had higher total and LDL-cholesterol,
222 but lower glucose levels. Hypertension and type 2 diabetes were lower in regular chocolate
223 consumers than in non-consumers. From a dietary perspsective, those who ate chocolate also
224 consumed more energy overall, and more daily serves of meat, vegetables and dairy foods,
PT
225 but significanly less alcohol. All cognitive scores were significantly higher in those who
RI
226 consumed chocolate at least once per week, than in those who never/rarely consumed
227 chocolate.
SC
228
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
229 Table 1 Participant characteristics according to baseline chocolate consumption in MSLS, N=968
Mean SD Mean SD
PT
Age (years) 61.8 13.0 62.1 12.8
Sex (%)
RI
Men 46.6 38.2*
SC
Women 53.4 61.8*
U
CES-D 7.6 7.2 7.6 6.6
AN
C-reactive protein (mg/L) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Total all food groups 13.8 4.7 15.4*** 4.4 0.36
PT
Total dairy foods 1.8 1.1 2.1** 1.1 0.21
RI
Cognitive outcomesd
SC
Visual Spatial Memory and -0.16 0.06 0.10*** 0.04 0.25
Organization
230 CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL
*
232 p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 for differences between groups.
a
233 Obesity defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.
C
b
234 Hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90
AC
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
239 Chocolate Consumption and Cognitive Performance in the MSLS
240 The multivariate tests performed as protection against multiple contrasts for multiple
241 outcome variables were statistically significant for all three models (covariate set 1: F
242 [Wilks’ lambda] = 2.93, p<0.001; covariate set 2: F = 2.43, p=0.004; covariate set 3: F =
243 2.21, p=0.009). Therefore we report the results of the univariate analyses for each cognitive
PT
244 outcome.
RI
245 Table 2 shows the adjusted mean z-scores (and SE) for each cognitive outcome across
246 increasing categories of chocolate intake (all three models). P-values are adjusted via the
SC
247 Bonferroni procedure. Chocolate intake was significantly and positively associated with the
248 Global Composite, Visual-Spatial Memory and Organization, Working Memory, Scanning
249
U
and Tracking, the Similarities test (abstract reasoning), and the MMSE (covariate set 1, all
AN
250 p<0.05).
251 With full adjustment for demographic variables, cardiovscular risk factors, and a
M
252 number of dietary variables including total energy intake, significant positive associations
D
253 remained between chocolate intake and the Global Composite, Visual-Spatial Memory and
TE
254 Organization, Scanning and Tracking, Similarites and the MMSE (covariate set 3, all
255 p<0.05). There were no associations observed between chocolate intake and Verbal Memory.
C EP
AC
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
256 Table 2 Multivariate adjusted mean (z-scores) (and SE) for each cognitive outcome across increment levels of chocolate intake, N=968
PT
set a <once/week once/week >once/week
RI
n=337 (34.8%) n=265 (27.4%) n=366 (37.8%)
SC
Mean SE Mean SE Mean SE
U
Global Composite 1 -0.155 0.047 0.038c * 0.053 0.129c *** 0.045 .262 <0.001
AN
2 -0.154 0.048 0.024c * 0.052 0.142c *** 0.046 .302 <0.001
M
3 -0.141 0.046 0.032c * 0.051 0.124c *** 0.044 .353 <0.001
D
Visual-Spatial Memory 1 -0.170 0.048 0.035c * 0.053 0.150c *** 0.046 .239 <0.001
and Organization
TE
EP
2 -0.153 0.046 0.046c * 0.051 0.126c *** 0.045 .345 <0.001
C
Verbal Memory 1 -0.101 0.050 0.114c * 0.057 0.025 0.048 .144 0.07
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Working Memory 1 -0.082 0.053 0.029 0.060 0.121 0.051 .049 0.048
RI
2 -0.059 0.054 0.053 0.059 0.042 0.052 .133 0.18
SC
3 -0.059 0.054 0.063 0.058 0.034 0.051 .151 0.22
U
Scanning Tracking 1 -0.110 0.045 -0.029 0.050 0.121c ** 0.043 .331 <0.001
AN
2 -0.109 0.044 -0.020 0.048 0.104c ** 0.042 .427 0.001
M
3 -0.099 0.044 -0.019 0.047 0.093c ** 0.042 .440 0.002
D
0.144c ***
TE
Similarities 1 -0.143 0.053 0 0.060 0.051 .040 <0.001
Mini-Mental State 1 -0.090 0.053 0.024 0.060 0.079 0.051 .042 0.023
Examination
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
257
RI
a
258 Covariate set 1 - adjustment for age and sex; Covariate set 2 - adjustment for age, sex, education, total cholesterol, glucose, LDL-cholesterol, hypertension,
SC
259 and total serves from all foods; Covariate set 3 - adjustment for variables in set 2 + dietary intake of alcohol, meats, vegetables, and dairy foods.
b
260 Adjusted R2 for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni).
U
c
261 significantly different from <once/week group, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
AN
262 Multivariate tests: covariate set 1: F (Wilks’ lambda) = 2.93, p<0.001; covariate set 2: F = 2.43, p=0.004; covariate set 3: F = 2.21, p=0.009.
M
263
264
D
TE
C EP
AC
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
265 Secondary Analyses
267 consumption rather than the other way round. This analysis was conducted on a sample of
268 participants (n=333) who had completed a cognitive assessment in waves 1-4 of the MSLS,
269 but also completed the dietary questionnaire at wave 6, a mean of 18.0 years later [51].
PT
270 Cognition was assessed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) [52], consisting
RI
271 of a total WAIS score, Verbal subscale score and Performance subscale score. There were no
272 significant associations between chocolate intake and the total WAIS (p=0.90), Verbal
SC
273 subscale (p=0.70) or Performance subscale (p=0.80) (all adjusted for age, sex and education).
274 Although income did not fit our criteria for inclusion as a covariate (did not correlate
275
U
significantly with chocolate intake), it may influence food choices and dietary patterns. We
AN
276 therefore added income to the basic model, and the results remain unchanged.
M
277
278 Discussion
D
279 Chocolate intake was positively associated with cognitive performance, across a range of
TE
281 between more frequent weekly chocolate consumption and cognitive performance remained
282 significant after adjustment for a number of cardiovascular risk factors, including total and
C
283 LDL-cholesterol, glucose levels, and hypertension. Associations were not attenuated with the
AC
284 addition of dietary variables (alcohol, meats, vegetables, and dairy foods), indicating that
285 chocolate may be associated with cognition irrespective of other dietary habits.
286 A number of studies provide support for the role of cocoa flavanols in cognition [27-
287 29]. In a placebo-controlled, double blind study, Scholey et al [27] compared cognitive
288 effects following the consumption of drinks containing either 520 mg of cocoa flavanols, 994
289 mg of cocoa flavanols, or a matched control drink in 30 young healthy adults. Mood and
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
290 cognitive performance were assessed over 60 minutes post-drink. Performance on a serial
292 drinks, compared to the control. The 994 mg cocoa flavanol beverage significantly increased
293 the speed on visual information processing responses, while increases in self-reported ‘mental
294 fatigue’ were significantly attenuated by the consumption of the 520 mg beverage.
PT
295 Field and colleagues [28] similarly examined the acute effects of cocoa flavanols on
RI
296 cognitive function (reaction time, visual spatial working memory), visual contrast sensitivity,
297 and motion sensitivity, in a cross-over study in 30 healthy young adults. Participants
SC
298 consumed dark chocolate containing 720 mg cocoa flavanols, and a matched quantity of
299 white chocolate. The dark chocolate improved visual spatial working memory, reaction time
300
U
on some aspects of the test, contrast sensitivity, and reduced the time to detect motion
AN
301 direction. The authors attributed these findings to increased cerebral blood flow caused by the
M
302 cocoa flavanols. Findings from these two studies demonstrated that improved cognitive
303 effects may be observed at 90-120 minutes post-flavanol intake [27, 28].
D
304 Findings from the recent CoCoA Study support this research [29]. In this trial, the
TE
305 effects of daily consumption (for 8 weeks) of a drink containing low (48 mg), intermediate
306 (520 mg), or high (993 mg) levels of cocoa flavanols on cognitive performance in 90 elderly,
EP
307 cognitively intact participants were examined. The intermediate and high flavanol groups
C
308 both showed improvements in processing speed and attentional tasks (measured by the Trail
AC
309 Making Test), whilst improvements in verbal fluency (Verbal Fluency Test) were greatest for
310 the high flavanol group. General cognition scores, as measured by the MMSE, were not
312 resistance, blood pressure, and lipid profile were detected in the high and intermediate
313 flavanol groups, compared with the low flavanol group. Importantly, benefits were noted at
314 multiple intake amounts. Some improvement was observed in the low flavanol group for
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
315 verbal fluency, however to a lesser degree than in the other two treatment groups. The
316 authors attributed this to the meythlxanthines (50 mg caffeine, 400 mg theobromine) in the
318 Other research has supported the action of the methylxanthines in chocolate, caffeine
PT
320 individuals from all over the world, possibly in part, due to its caffeine content. It is the best
RI
321 known psychoactive stimulant acting to improve short-term alertness and arousal [25, 53].
322 Longer-term, population based studies have provided evidence that long-term caffeine intake
SC
323 may offer some protection against cognitive decline [54].
324 Studies by Smit and colleagues [24] have provided evidence for the beneficial effects
325
U
of the methylxanthines contained in chocolate. They measured the effects on cognitive
AN
326 performance and mood from the consumption of the equivalent amount of cocoa powder and
M
328 chocolate. Identical improvements on energetic arousal and cognitive function were found for
D
329 cocoa powder and the methylxanthines versus a placebo. In chocolate, both ‘milk’ and ‘dark’
TE
330 chocolate methylxanthine doses improved cognitive function compared with ‘white
331 chocolate’. In subsequent work, Smit et al [55] also demonstrated that the methylxanthines in
EP
332 amounts found in 50 g of chocolate may well contribute to our ‘liking’ of chocolate.
C
333 Other studies have supported the findings of Smit et al [24]. Mitchell et al [25]
AC
334 compared the effects of caffeine (120 mg), theobromine (700 mg), the combination of both,
335 or a placebo, on mood and cognitive performance (psychomotor speed). Theobromine alone
336 decreased calmness, caffeine alone increased alertness and contentedness, while the
337 combination of both had similar effects as caffeine alone on mood, although neither improved
338 psychomotor speed. However, the levels of caffeine and theobromine administered in this
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
340 A number of recent reviews have explored the central actions of cocoa flavanols in
341 relation to cognition [9] and mood [56]. Excellent reviews by Sokolov et al [9] and Williams
342 et al [57] discuss how the actions of cocoa flavanols and flavonoids, respectively, impact
343 upon neurocognition and behavior. To summarize, flavanols have multiple effects on brain
344 function, but their neuropsychologial actions are likely to occur in two ways: 1) via direct
PT
345 interactions with cellular and molecular signalling cascades in brain regions involved with
RI
346 learning and memory, and 2) via increasing central and peripheral blood flow and promoting
SC
348 Cardiovascular health is closely linked to cognitive health [58]. Further, the relation
349 between dietary habits and the human brain is complex and involves bi-directional
350
U
communication. Intellectual status early in life may certainly effect good or poor food choices
AN
351 [51]. However, we were able to asses for any relation between cognitive performance
M
352 measured at waves 1-4 of the MSLS, with chocolate intake at wave 6, and found no
353 prospective associations. Performance on the WAIS, which combines both verbal and
D
354 performance abilities, did not predict chocolate intake controlling for age, sex, and education.
TE
355 Income may be another factor that potentially influences the relation between
356 chocolate consumption and cognitive function. It may be speculated that higher income
EP
357 individuals may purchase and consume more chocolate, and in particular dark chocolate,
C
358 which has a higher flavanol content. However, sensitivity analyses with income added to the
AC
359 basic model, did not change the findings. We also note that those who consumed chocolate
360 more frequently drank significantly less alcohol. Another plausible explanation may be that
361 alcohol actually has a deleterious effect on cognitive function, explaining the results
362 observed. However, additional analyses revealed no association between alcohol intake and
363 the Global Composite, Visual-Spatial Memory and Organization, Scanning and Tracking, or
364 the Similarities test (all p>0.2, all covariate set 3). Alcohol intake was, in fact, significantly,
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
365 positively associated with Verbal Memory, Working Memory and the MMSE
366 (unstandardized B=0.001, p<0.05 for all, covariate set 3) (data not shown).
367
368 Limitations
369 Some limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. Chocolate intake was self-
PT
370 reported, and therefore subject to inherent reporting error. The dietary questionnaire used did
RI
371 not require the respondent to differentiate between dark, milk or white chocolate. Most
372 clinical trials have used dark chocolate as the source of cocoa flavanols. In 2012, the
SC
373 distribution share of chocolate in the United States by favourite chocolate type was 57% milk
374 chocolate, 35% dark chocolate, and 8% white chocolate [1]. We can therefore make the
375
U
assumption that the majority of chocolate consumed in this sample was dark or milk, both
AN
376 containing cocoa flavanols to varying degrees. With the exception of the secondary analysis,
M
377 the study was cross-sectional as longitudinal data following wave 6 were not available. This
378 precludes any conclusions regarding a causal relationship between chocolate intake and
D
379 cognition from being drawn. Future longitudinal studies in this area will be of value.
TE
380
381 Strengths
EP
382 Our study demonstrated positive associations between habitual chocolate consumption and
C
383 cognitive performance. We were able to statistically control for a number of cardiovascular,
AC
384 lifestyle and dietary variables that may impact upon a chocolate-cognition relationship.
385 Despite the dietary intervention trials which have typically examined the effects from either a
386 single dose or daily doses over periods up to several months, there have not been any large
387 cross-sectional studies identified that have specifically examined chocolate intake in relation
388 to cognitive performance. Further, we were able, with a prospective design, to examine the
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
389 relation between early cognitive functioning (at waves 1 to 4) and chocolate consumption (at
391
392 Conclusion
393 It is evident that nutrients in foods exert differential effects on the brain. As has been
PT
394 repeatedly demonstrated, isolating these nutrients and foods enables the formation of dietary
RI
395 interventions to optimise neuropsychological health. Adopting dietary patterns to delay or
396 slow the onset of cognitive decline is an appropriate avenue, given the limited treatments
SC
397 available for dementia. The present findings support recent clinical trials suggesting that
398 regular intake of cocoa flavanols may have a beneficial effect on cognitive function, and
399
U
possibly protect against normal age-related cognitive decline. Longer-term clinical trials will
AN
400 shed further insight into this association between chocolate, rich in cocoa flavanols, and
M
401 neuropsychologial health, and the mechanisms linking them. It will be important in future
402 studies to investigate optimal quantities and duration of consumption to produce short or
D
403 longer-tem effects while taking into account overall dietary patterns, where foods high in
TE
404 flavonoids are consumed in combination. Enhancing chocolate and cocoa consumption whilst
405 ensuring appropriate caloric intake will be an important consideration to optimise the benefits
EP
407
AC
408
409 Highlights
410
411 >Chocolate has been used since ancient times to treat many health complaints. >The impact
412 of chocolate on cognitive function is not well understood. >Chocolate intake was positively
413 associated with cognitive performance. >Mechanisms may involve the action of cocoa
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
415 Acknowledgements
416 We thank the three primary investigators of the MSLS (Prof Merrill Elias, Prof Michael
417 Robbins and David H. P. Streeten, MD). The research was supported in part by the National
418 Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grants HL67358 and HL81290) and the National Institute
419 on Aging (grant AG03055) of the National Institutes of Health to the University of Maine.
PT
420 GEC was supported by a Sidney Sax Research Fellowship (National Health and Medical
RI
421 Research Council, Australia, grant number APP1054567). AA was supported by a grant from
422 the Fond National de Recherche for the project DIQUA-LUX (5870404), Luxembourg. The
SC
423 funding sources had no involvement in data collection, writing of the report or decision to
425
U
AN
426 Conflict of interest
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
428 References
429 1. Statista. Statistics and facts on the chocolate industry. Retrieved December 7, 2015;
431 2. Parker G, Parker I, Brotchie H. Mood state effects of chocolate. J Affect Disord. 2006;
PT
432 92: 149-159.
RI
434 states. Appetite. 2007; 49: 667-674.
SC
435 4. Macht M, Dettmer D. Everyday mood and emotions after eating a chocolate bar or an
U
437 5. Wilson PK. Centuries of seeking chocolate's medicinal benefits. Lancet. 2010; 376:
AN
438 158-159.
439 6. Heiss C, Keen CL, Kelm M. Flavanols and cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur
M
441 7. Hooper L, Kay C, Abdelhamid A, et al. Effects of chocolate, cocoa, and flavan-3-ols
TE
446 9. Sokolov AN, Pavlova MA, Klosterhalfen S, Enck P. Chocolate and the brain:
AC
447 neurobiological impact of cocoa flavanols on cognition and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav
450 dark chocolate is followed by a significant increase in insulin sensitivity and a decrease in
451 blood pressure in healthy persons. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81: 611-614.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
452 11. Engler MB, Engler MM, Chen CY, et al. Flavonoid-rich dark chocolate improves
453 endothelial function and increases plasma epicatechin concentrations in healthy adults. J Am
455 12. Heiss C, Finis D, Kleinbongard P, et al. Sustained increase in flow-mediated dilation
456 after daily intake of high-flavanol cocoa drink over 1 week. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007;
PT
457 49: 74-80.
RI
458 13. Sorond FA, Lipsitz LA, Hollenberg NK, Fisher ND. Cerebral blood flow response to
459 flavanol-rich cocoa in healthy elderly humans. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008; 4: 433-440.
SC
460 14. Bryan J. Mechanisms and evidence for the role of nutrition in cognitive ageing.
462 15.
U
Solfrizzi V, Panza F, Capurso A. The role of diet in cognitive decline. J Neural
AN
463 Transm. 2003; 110: 95-110.
M
464 16. Van Dyk K, Sano M. The impact of nutrition on cognition in the elderly. Neurochem
466 17. Crichton GE, Bryan J, Murphy KJ, Buckley J. Review of dairy consumption and
TE
467 cognitive performance in adults: findings and methodological issues. Dement Geriatr Cogn
469 18. Crichton GE, Elias MF, Buckley J, Murphy KJ, Bryan J, Frisardi V. Metabolic
C
470 Syndrome, Cognitive Performance, and Dementia. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.
AC
471 2011.
472 19. Haider S, Batool Z, Tabassum S, et al. Effects of walnuts (Juglans regia) on learning
473 and memory functions. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011; 66: 335-340.
475 Flavonoid intake and cognitive decline over a 10-year period. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165:
476 1364-1371.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
477 21. Nurk E, Refsum H, Drevon CA, et al. Intake of flavonoid-rich wine, tea, and
478 chocolate by elderly men and women is associated with better cognitive test performance. J
480 22. Macready AL, Kennedy OB, Ellis JA, Williams CM, Spencer JP, Butler LT.
481 Flavonoids and cognitive function: a review of human randomized controlled trial studies and
PT
482 recommendations for future studies. Genes Nutr. 2009; 4: 227-242.
RI
483 23. Gu L, Kelm MA, Hammerstone JF, et al. Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in
484 common foods and estimations of normal consumption. J Nutr. 2004; 134: 613-617.
SC
485 24. Smit HJ, Gaffan EA, Rogers PJ. Methylxanthines are the psycho-pharmacologically
487 25.
U
Mitchell ES, Slettenaar M, vd Meer N, et al. Differential contributions of theobromine
AN
488 and caffeine on mood, psychomotor performance and blood pressure. Physiol Behav. 2011;
M
490 26. Bhagwat S, Haytowitz DM, Holden JM. USDA Database for the Flavanoid Content
D
491 of Selected Foods. Release 3.1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research
TE
493 http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata/flav.
EP
494 27. Scholey AB, French SJ, Morris PJ, Kennedy DO, Milne AL, Haskell CF.
C
495 Consumption of cocoa flavanols results in acute improvements in mood and cognitive
AC
496 performance during sustained mental effort. J Psychopharmacol. 2010; 24: 1505-1514.
497 28. Field DT, Williams CM, Butler LT. Consumption of cocoa flavanols results in an
498 acute improvement in visual and cognitive functions. Physiol Behav. 2011; 103: 255-260.
500 improves cognitive function, blood pressure control, and metabolic profile in elderly subjects:
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
501 the Cocoa, Cognition, and Aging (CoCoA) Study--a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin
503 30. Crews WD, Jr., Harrison DW, Wright JW. A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
504 randomized trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa on variables associated with
505 neuropsychological functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical findings from a sample of
PT
506 healthy, cognitively intact older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 87: 872-880.
RI
507 31. Camfield DA, Scholey A, Pipingas A, et al. Steady state visually evoked potential
508 (SSVEP) topography changes associated with cocoa flavanol consumption. Physiol Behav.
SC
509 2012; 105: 948-957.
510 32. Francis ST, Head K, Morris PG, Macdonald IA. The effect of flavanol-rich cocoa on
511
U
the fMRI response to a cognitive task in healthy young people. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol.
AN
512 2006; 47 Suppl 2: S215-220.
M
513 33. Dore GA, Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Elias PK. Relation between central
514 adiposity and cognitive function in the Maine-Syracuse Study: attenuation by physical
D
516 34. Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Abhayaratna WP, Dore GA, Elias PK. Arterial
517 pulse wave velocity and cognition with advancing age. Hypertension. 2009; 53: 668-673.
EP
518 35. Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, et al. Homocysteine, folate, and vitamins B6 and
C
519 B12 blood levels in relation to cognitive performance: the Maine-Syracuse study. Psychosom
AC
521 36. Robbins MA, Elias MF, Elias PK, Budge MM. Blood pressure and cognitive function
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
524 37. Elias MF, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Au R, White RF, D'Agostino RB. The preclinical phase
525 of Alzheimer Disease: A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham Cohort. Arch Neurol.
527 38. Tierney MC, Moineddin R, McDowell I. Prediction of All-Cause Dementia Using
PT
529 Sample. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010; 22: 1231-1240.
RI
530 39. Tierney MC, Yao C, Kiss A, McDowell I. Neuropsychological tests accurately predict
531 incident Alzheimer disease after 5 and 10 years. Neurology. 2005; 64: 1853-1859.
SC
532 40. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical
533 diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the
534
U
auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.
AN
535 Neurology. 1984; 34: 939-944.
M
536 41. Kaaks R, Riboli E. Validation and calibration of dietary intake measurements in the
537 EPIC project: methodological considerations. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer
D
539 42. Riboli E, Kaaks R. The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European
540 Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997; 26(suppl 1): S6-
EP
541 14.
C
543 44. Elias MF, Elias PK, Seliger SL, Narsipur SS, Dore GA, Robbins MA. Chronic kidney
544 disease, creatinine and cognitive functioning. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009; 24: 2446-2452.
545 45. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW: Neuropsychological Assessment (4th Ed.).
547 46. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for
548 grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198.
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
549 47. Wolf AM, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a self-
551 48. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the
553 49. van der Laan MJ, Dudoit S, Pollard KS. Multiple testing. Part II. Step-down
PT
554 procedures for control of the family-wise error rate. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004; 3:
RI
555 Article14.
556 50. Jaccard J, Jacoby J: Theory Construction and Model-building Skills: A Practical
SC
557 Guide for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2010.
558 51. Crichton GE, Elias MF, Davey A, Alkerwi A, Dore G. Higher cognitive performance
559
U
is prospectively associated with healthy dietary choices: The Maine Syracuse Longitudinal
AN
560 Study. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. 2014; 2: 24-32.
M
561 52. Wechsler D: The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Manual for the
563 53. Yoshimura H. The potential of caffeine for functional modification from cortical
TE
564 synapses to neuron networks in the brain. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2005; 3: 309-316.
565 54. Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Barulli MR, et al. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption and
EP
566 prevention of late-life cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review. J Nutr Health
C
568 55. Smit HJ, Blackburn RJ. Reinforcing effects of caffeine and theobromine as found in
570 56. Smith DF. Benefits of flavanol-rich cocoa-derived products for mental well-being: A
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
572 57. Williams RJ, Spencer JP. Flavonoids, cognition, and dementia: actions, mechanisms,
573 and potential therapeutic utility for Alzheimer disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012; 52: 35-
574 45.
575 58. Waldstein SR, Elias MF (eds): Neuropsychology of Cardiovascular Disease (2nd
PT
577
578
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
30