Plaintiffs Civil Case No. vs. 123456 For: Damages for B SHIPPING LINES, Breach of Contract of Defendant Carriage X-------------------------------------------------X
ANSWER WITH COUNTERCLAIM
COMES NOW, the defendant, through the undersigned counsel and
unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully alleges:
1. That Defendant admits the averments in paragraph 1 and 2 of
the complaint;
2. That Defendant specifically denies the allegation in paragraph 3
of the complaint insofar as it alleges that Defendant received the shipment clean, the truth being that when petitioner presented the shipment for transport, the same was already damaged as evidenced by the foul bill of lading issued by the carrier’s cargo surveyor Mr. Lakas G. Bagani after inspection with the remark "damaged goods". Attached herein is a copy of the foul bill of lading marked as Annex "A".
3. That Defendant specifically denies the allegation in paragraph 4
in so far as it alleges that the broken windshields and dents were obtained while in transit, the truth being that they were already damaged when received by the carrier for transport.
4. That Defendant has no knowledge or information sufficient to
form a belief as to the truth of the averments in paragraphs 5, 6,7,8, and 9 of the complaint;
5. That Defendant specifically denies the allegation in paragraph
10 insofar as it alleges that Defendant disregarded the demand letter of the plaintiff, the truth being that Defendant had already sent a letter in response. Attached herein is a copy of the reply letter marked as Annex "B".
By way of counterclaim, defendant alleges:
6. That by virtue of this unwarranted and malicious act initiated by the plaintiff, defendant was forced to engage counsel in the sum of P60,000.00.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, Defendants most
respectfully pray for the dismissal of the complaint and the award of counterclaim to them. Other reliefs are likewise prayed for.
EXPLANATION
Copy of this pleading was sent to the opposing counsel through
personal service and received by her on February 19, 2018.
Cebu City, Philippines, February 19, 2018.
Atty. Marie Emily T. Delos Reyes
Counsel for the Defendant Capitol Site, Cebu City Roll No. 18188 IBP Lifetime No. 01896, Jan. 30,2018 PTR No. 01188981, Jan. 30, 2018 Issued in Cebu City MCLE Comp. Cert. No. IV-00818182
Copy Furnished:
Atty. Justine Wayne D. Agramon
Counsel for the Plaintiff General Maxilom Avenue Cebu City
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Paul Decologero, A/K/A Big Paul, A/K/A Paulie, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. John P. Decologero, Jr., A/K/A Little John, A/K/A John-John, Paul J. Decologero, A/K/A Young Paul, Derek Capozzi, Joseph F. Pavone, Daniel G. Tsoukalas, Defendants/cross-Appellees, and in Re United States of America, 364 F.3d 12, 1st Cir. (2004)