Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Malaysia has a good mix of energy resources like oil, natural gas, coal and renewable energies such as
Received 27 February 2011 biomass, solar and hydro. In spite of this plenty of resources, the country is dependent on fossil fuel
Accepted 5 July 2011 for industrial and transportation sector. In 2009, 94.5% of electricity is generated by using fossil fuel
Available online 17 September 2011
such as natural gas, coal, diesel oil and fuel oil. Until now, Malaysia stills a net energy exporter. Con-
cerns about energy security, the fluctuation of crude oil price and climate change are driving significant
Keywords:
changes in how energy and electricity specifically, is generated, transmitted and consumed in Malaysia.
Sustainable energy
In this regard, renewable energy resources are becoming attractive for sustainable energy development
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
in Malaysia. There is because renewable sources of energy are abundant in Malaysia, the significant ones
Wind energy being biomass and solar. This article presents a review of present energy situation and energy policies
Solar energy for the energy sector in Malaysia. Investigation of various renewable energy and examine the energy
and environmental issues associated with this energy. The review of current usage of renewable energy
sources and also its potential implementation are evaluated to provide solution for the national.
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4370
2. Energy use in Malaysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4371
3. Renewable energy in Malaysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4372
3.1. Biomass energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4374
3.2. Solar energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4374
3.3. Hydropower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4375
3.4. Wind and tidal energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4375
4. Environment impact of energy use in Malaysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4376
5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4376
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4376
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4377
1364-0321/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.113
S.M. Shafie et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 4370–4377 4371
15
rate %
10
0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
-5
Year
Table 1
Primary energy consumption of Malaysia during 2000–2008.
Total electricity capacity (million kW) 13.762 14.813 15.671 20.119 24.432 23.333 20.878 20.878 NA
Total electricity consumption (billion kWh) 59.983 65.113 66.893 70.269 75.009 78.915 95.95 99.247 NA
Total renewable consumption 7.34 6.372 5.249 5.694 5.77 5.136 6.38 6.426 6.706
Hydroelectricity consumption 7.34 6.371 5.248 5.693 5.769 5.135 6.379 6.425 6.705
Non-hydroelectric 0 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Geothermal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wind 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Solar, tide and wave 0 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Total electricity generation 65.428 67.424 70.01 74.01 78.218 82.324 99.51 103.181 106.691
Total conventional generation 58.088 61.052 64.761 68.316 72.448 77.188 93.13 96.755 99.985
Total renewable generation 7.34 6.372 5.249 5.694 5.77 5.136 6.38 6.426 6.706
Total primary energy production (Quadrillion-Btu) 3.31319 3.33962 3.43189 3.65955 3.77261 3.60459 3.58331 3.5172
Total primary energy consumption (Quadrillion-Btu) 1.97671 2.09382 2.17531 2.26785 2.31652 2.33821 2.45683 2.41255
Source: [9].
4372 S.M. Shafie et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 4370–4377
Production
Thousand
600
Consumption
400 petroleum
400 production
200
200
Year 0
0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Year
Fig. 3. Malaysia’s petroleum production and consumption, 1980–2009.
Fig. 6. Petroleum production.
Coal Production
0.03 power generation, mainly driven by the Malaysian governmental
policy of shifting to coal in order to reduce high dependence of this
sector to natural gas. In spite of this, in the long term fossil fuels
Coal Production
0.02 are finite and they are depleting. As fossil fuels deplete and become
Quad Btu
2000
energy (RE) resources and efficient use of energy were further pro-
moted. Table 2 shows the Green Technology Financing Scheme in
1500
Malaysia.
Malaysia has introduced the Green Technology Policy that will
1000
Natural gas facilitate the development of knowledge society, which would
production encourage us to embrace a sustainable and better way of living
500
on 9th April 2009. In that portfolio the use of renewable energy
is satisfy the criteria of green energy. Renewable energy resources
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 available in Malaysia are biomass, solar, mini-hydropower, munic-
Year ipal waste and biogas. Among them, the Ministry of Energy, Green
Technology and Water state that the huge potential renewable
Fig. 5. Natural gas production. energy at Malaysia is biomass and solar energy. Biomass resources
S.M. Shafie et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 4370–4377 4373
Table 2 Table 5
Green technology financing scheme. Tariff structure for FiT implementation at Malaysia (Proposed for 2011).
Table 6 in Malaysia are oil palm (43.67%), rubber (30.56%), rice (12.68%),
Cumulative Quato on RE capacity.
cocoa (6.75%) and coconut (6.34%). These provide Malaysia huge of
Year Biomass Biogas Mini hydro Solar PV Solid Total biomass resources. In fact, government of Malaysia has announced
(MW) (MW) (MW) (MW) waste (MW) the 5th Fuel Policy that states “To supplement the conventional
(MW)
supply of energy, new sources such as renewable energy will be
2011 110 20 60 9 20 219 encouraged and biomass resources such as oil palm and wood
2012 150 35 110 20 50 365 waste as well as rice husks, will be used on a wider basis mainly
2013 200 50 170 33 90 543
for electricity generation” [28]. Currently, residue from agriculture
2014 260 75 230 48 140 753
2015 330 100 290 65 200 985 crops like paddy, rubber and sugar are use as fuel for generation
2016 410 125 350 84 240 1209 of electricity in Malaysia using the cogeneration system. However,
2017 500 155 400 105 280 1440 the percentage of using this residue for electricity generation is
2018 600 185 440 129 310 1664
still low. Biomass residues are the main source of energy input
2019 700 215 470 157 340 1882
2020 800 240 490 190 360 2080 to the mills using cogeneration system. It has been estimated the
total biomass energy potential is equivalent to 2-3% of total power
production in the country [29]. Report from [30], about 14 mills
3.1. Biomass energy already used agriculture waste for energy demand, both for steam
and electricity with total capacity amount 1567.2 MW. The increas-
Malaysia is bestowed with significant amount of biomass ing amount of paddy production make highly potential in CHP
resources. These make the biomass most promising option, com- technology to convert the paddy husk residue for energy purpose.
pare to others various source of renewable energy at Malaysia. Around 20% of paddy is husk, rice husk in turn contains 16–22% ash,
Malaysia total land area is 32.90 million ha. About 61% of the area is and 90–96% of the ash is composed of silica (silicon dioxide, SiO2 ).
still natural forest, while 14.9% is use for agriculture activities. The According to [31], by 2020 Malaysia will produce 768,290 tonnes
five major sectors that wastes contribute to the biomass energy in of rice husk. As refer to [32], 1.5 kg of rice husk can generate
Malaysia are oil palm cultivation (43.67%), forestry (wood) (30.56%) 1 kWh, this mean by 2020 Malaysia can produce 512 TWh using
rubber cultivation, animal farming and urban wastes. However, rice husk residue. Some example of cogeneration project based
among of these palm oil wastes including biogas are the largest on rice husk installed in Pendang Kedah Darulaman, which uses a
source of biomass in the country. steam boiler, 6.5 tonnes/h, 30 bar, saturated, connected to a 450 kW
Malaysia is the world second largest producer and exporter of back pressure turbine and heat exchanger [33]. Electricity pro-
crude palm oil. The development of palm oil plantation increased duces use for their owned consumption. Other example of rice husk
substantially from 400 ha in 1920 to about 4.69 million ha in 2009, project cogeneration that connected to system grid is installed at
and is projected to expand to 5.2 million ha in 2020 [23]. The expan- Titi Serong Rice Mill [34].
sion of the palm oil industry is expected to generate huge quantities In Malaysia, the annual production of sugarcane bagasse reaches
of biomass wastes that could be used as a potential source of renew- a number of million tonnes [35]. Nearly 30% of that number will turn
able energy. This because, 1 ha of palm oil plantation can produce into bagasse when it is crushed in a sugar factory [36]. Sugarcane
about 50–70 tonnes of biomass residues [24]. At, present, there are baggase is the fibrous waste that remains after recovery of sugar
about 417 palm oil mills found in the country, which dispose a juice via crushing and extraction. A ton of bagasse (50% mill-wet
substantial amount of biomass waste in the form of empty fruit basis) is equal to 1.6 barrels of fuel oil on energy basis. The total of
bunches (EFB), mesocarp fibers and shells annually. sugarcane energy content on dry basis, excluding ash (around 2–3%
Fig. 7 shows the cultivated area for oil palm in Malaysia (divided of weight) can be divided into three main parts. Malaysia produces
into three categories, i.e. Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak) 274,620 tonnes of sugarcane for 2009, with a moisture content of
within 34 years. The total oil palm planted area in the country 50%. This means we can get 150,000 tonnes of dry bagasse annually.
increased by 4.5% to 4.69 million ha in 2009 [25]. In Sabah and The caloric value for dry bagasse comes to be 17.33 MJ/kg, which
Sarawak, the drastic increase in the 1990s can be attributed to make to total energy potential of 0.421 million boe per year. At
the government policy in the intensification of palm oil industries the time, all the bagasse is being used as boiler fuels in sugar mills
in East Malaysia [26]. Malaysia produces about 15 million metric operating in the country. Most agriculture crops in Malaysia can
tonnes of palm oil per year. One tonne produces about 414 kg of be used to generate electricity. If all crops are fully utilize can help
biodiesel. With a caloric value of about 40,000 kJ/kg, this results in reduce the dependency on fossil fuel sources.
a total energy supply of about 7.8 GW/year from palm oil.
While the total energy available from residues and landfill 3.2. Solar energy
gas has been estimated as 3.1 GW [27]. Major agriculture crop
Solar energy, a green and renewable energy source, is the con-
version of sunlight into electricity via the use of solar cell installed
5 in a solar panel. This system called photovoltaic cells. Photo-
Millions
Total
voltaic cells produce electricity when sunlight excited electrons
Peninsular Malaysia
4
Area (Hectares)
Table 7 Table 9
Status program offered under MBIPV project. List of Malaysia hydropower.
MBIPV program Target capacity Awarded Commissioned Peninsular Malaysia (MW) Sarawak/Sabah (MW)
(kWp) capacity (kWp) capacity (kWp)
Nenggiri 450 Murun 900
Showcase 125 140 140 Lebir 272 Baleh 950
Demonstration 205 214 197 Galas 108 Pelagus 770
SURIA1000 1215 885 146 Ulu Terengganu 516 Ligawa 164
Total 1545 1239 483 Tekai 156
Telom Dam 91
Source: [41].
Maran 109
Source: [50].
200
180 100
Thousands kilotons
160
80
140
Billion kWh
120
60 Total electricity generation
100
80 CO2 emission 40 Electric power transmission
60 and distribution loss
40
20
20
0
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year Year
Fig. 8. CO2 emission at Malaysia, 1980–2006.
Fig. 9. Electricity generation and the power losses.
Ref. [52], state that Terumbu Layang-Layang Island has the largest
Table 10
wind energy potential compared to other places in Malaysia. Total environment impacts of electricity generation.
Tidal energy is also promising renewable energy source avail-
Pollution 1999 pollution 2000 pollution 2009 fuel 2020 proposed
able in Malaysia. Until recently, a preliminary study was carried out
emissions intensity (Kt) intensity (Kt) mix (Kt) fuel mix (Kt)
to explore the potential of ocean energy for electricity generation
CO2 298,339 330,529 350,559 800,519
in Malaysia [53]. Study by Ref. [54], identified that Pulau Jamban-
SO2 3159 3544 3840 3840
gan, Kota Belud and Sibu are the locations with great potential for NOX 2445 2616 2316 18,316
tidal energy extraction. The total amount of electricity that can be
Source: [59].
generated on those locations is about 14.5 GWh/year.
4. Environment impact of energy use in Malaysia of these power plants is only about 35–40% with the remaining
chemical energy converted into heat. Fig. 9 shows the pattern of
Malaysia also facing the same situations likes others countries electricity generation and the transmission and distribution losses
in energy industries regarding the global environment issue, fluc- between years 2000 until 2007. The unstable pattern can see for
tuation of oil price and also the depleting of fossil fuel. Recently, air power transmission and distribution loss, while total electricity
pollution is becoming a great environmental concern in Malaysia. generation shows the increasing for kWh each year. Malaysia elec-
Air pollution from energy utilization in this country is due to the tricity generation pattern see the change in fuel mix generation
combustion of coal, lignite, petroleum, natural gas, wood, and agri- were switching from fossil fuel to coal since the implementation of
cultural and animal wastes. All these basic fuels produce by product 5th Fuel Policy 2001. The too much reliance on coal has environ-
such as CO2 , SO2 and NOX . In Malaysia, the CO2 emissions totaled mental implication. Its utilization faces major challenges as shown
about 118 million tonnes in 2006. The amount of carbon emis- in Table 10 [59]. Greater dependence on coal for electricity gen-
sion per person was about 7.2 tonnes. Fig. 8 shows the emission of eration as well as its pollution implications could be avoided if
CO2 at Malaysia for 26 years from 1980 until 2006. Owing mainly Malaysia switches to others sources of renewable energy like wind,
to the rapid growth of primary energy consumption, CO2 emis- photovoltaic, solar thermal and biomass [60].
sions in particular have increased rapidly in 1990an until now.
The evidence also suggests that degradation of the environment
5. Conclusion
precedes economic growth. In Malaysia, an increase in pollution
level induces economic expansion is not surprising given that much
The Malaysian energy sector is still heavily dependent on non-
energy inputs have been consumed in the production to promote
renewable fuel such as fossil fuel and natural gas as a source of
heavy industry [55].
energy. The main reasons to search for alternative energy are due
The Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCC is an amendment to the
to energy security and environment. Meanwhile, these sources will
international treaty signed in1992 on climate change, assigning
come to the end (deplete) and also harm the environment (cli-
mandatory emission limitations for the reduction of greenhouse
mate change problem). A large portion of the environment impact
gas emissions to the signatory nations. The objective of the pro-
in a society is associated with its utilization of energy resources.
tocol is the stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the
Malaysia need to take fast action reduce the dependent on non-
atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic
renewable and start realize the potential of renewable energy such
interference with the climate system. Malaysia is a party to the
as biomass, solar and also wind source. The main stakeholder like
UNFCC and has ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Malaysia ratified Kyoto
government, institution, industry and society should discuss this
Protocol on 4 September 2002. At the Copenhagen Climate Change
issue in depth before it late in order to become a sustainable coun-
conference, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak announced that
try. All strategies for accommodating the fossil fuel decline require
Malaysia was committed to reducing its carbon emissions by offer-
decades to have any significant effect. The study done by [11]
ing ‘credible cut’ of up to 40% by 2020. Start this year, Malaysia need
showed that a generally takes decades to substitute one form of pri-
to step down it emissions about 4% every year. Fossil fuel was main
mary energy and 100 years for a given source of energy to achieve
contribution of greenhouse gases at the same time affect the plant
50% market penetration.
growth. Also according to [56], utilization of fossil energy is caus-
ing major local environmental and health concern. Fossil fuels play
main role in acidification and global climate change because this Acknowledgements
burning fuel produce CO2 , SO2 and NOX [57]. Study found by Ref.
[58], in Malaysia the electricity generation sectors have produced The authors would like to acknowledge for the Ministry of
huge emission from their power plants. This is due to effectiveness Higher Education of Malaysia and The University of Malaya, Kuala
S.M. Shafie et al. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 4370–4377 4377
Lumpur, Malaysia for the financial support under UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ [32] Mathias AJ. Successful development of a cogeneration project: a case study in
ENG/06 (D000006-16001). rice milling industry. EC-ASEAN COGEN Program Phase III. Brunei; 2004.
[33] EC-ASEAN COGEN Programme Phase II: a 450 kW rice husk-fired cogeneration
plant (Malaysia); 2001.
References [34] The EC-ASEAN Business Facilitator, FSDP Special Issue. Biomass is power-
converting rice-husk into useful energy: How Titi Serong Edar Sdn. Bhd. will
[1] The Malaysia Economic in Figures 2010. Economic planning unit. Prime Minis- do it.; 2005.
ter Department. http://www.epu.gov.my/malaysianeconomyfigures2009. [35] FOA. Food and agriculture commodities production; 2009.
[2] EarthTrends. Energy and resources; 2010. Malaysia.earthtrends.wri.org. [36] Wirawan R, Sapuan SM, RobiahY, Khalina, A. IOP conf. series: materials science
[3] Koh SL, Lim YS. Meeting energy demand in developing economy with- and engineering 11. IOP Publishing; 2010.
out damaging the environment – a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, from [37] Azhari AW, Sopian K, Zaharim A, Ghoul MA. A new approach for predicting
technical, environment and economic perspectives. Energy Policy 2010;38: solar radiation in tropical environment using satellite images – case study of
4719–28. Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environmental Development 2008;4:373–8.
[4] Chandran VGR, Sharma S, Madhavan K. Electricity consumption-growth nexus: [38] Mohamed AR, Lee KT. Energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: energy
the case of Malaysia. Energy Policy 2010;38:606–12. policy and alternative energy. Energy Policy 2006;34:2388–97.
[5] Keong CY. Energy demand, economic growth, and energy efficiency – [39] Ahmad S, Kadir MZA, Shafie S. Current perspective of the renewable
the Bakun dam-induced sustainable energy policy revisited. Energy Policy energy development in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
2005;33:679–89. 2011;15:897–904.
[6] Pusat Tenaga Malaysia. Annual report 2008. Kuala Lumpur; 2008. [40] Sopian K, Othman M, Yatim B, Daud WRW. Future directions in Malaysian envi-
[7] Unit Perancang Ekonomi. Rancangan Malaysia Kesepuluh 2011–2015. Putra- ronment friendly renewable energy technologies research and development.
jaya; 2010. Science and Technology Vision 2005;1:30–6.
[8] Sriram S. Solar power in Malaysia – impediments to growth. Asia pacific Energy [41] Lojuntin SA. Renewable energy development in Malaysia. Malaysia: Pusat
Practice. Frost & Sullivan Market Insight; 2006. Tenaga Malaysia; 2009.
[9] International Energy Data and Analysis for Malaysia. US Energy Information [42] Seng LY, Lalchand G, Lin GMS. Economical, environmental and technical anal-
Administration. ysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems in Malaysia. Energy Policy
[10] Ministry of Housing and Local Government. National Physical Plan; 2005. 2008;36:2130–42.
www.npptownplan.gov.my. [43] http://www.mbipv.net.my/.
[11] Gan PY, Li Z. An econometric study on long-term energy outlook and [44] Business Times. Mustapa: Malaysia keen to develop ‘solar valleys’; 2010.
the implications of renewable energy utilization in Malaysia. Energy Policy [45] http://www.kettha.gov.my/en/content/solar-energy.
2008;36:890–9. [46] Bernama. Business Time. 1400 megawatts solar power annually by 2013; 2010.
[12] Bernama. Green technology to play key role in new economic model; 2009. [47] Pimentel D. Renewable and solar energy technologies: energy and environ-
[13] GTFS Guideline. http://www.gtfs.my/node/27. mental issues. Biofuels, solar, and wind as renewable energy systems. Springer
[14] Poh KM. Biomass utilization in Malaysia. Forest Research Institute in Malaysia; Science + Business Media; 2008.
2000. [48] Gleick PH, Adams AD. Water: the potential consequences of climate variability
[15] Pimental D. Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems: benefits and and change. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environ-
risks. Springer; 2008. ment, and Security; 2000.
[16] The Star Online. Malaysia looking at alternative sources; 2010. [49] New Straits Times, Business Times. Talks on Bakun power supply; 2010.
[17] Energy commission. http://www.st.gov.my/index.php. [50] Jalal TS, Bodger P. National energy policies and electricity sector in Malaysia.
[18] Keong CY. Recovering renewable energy for palm oil waste and biogas. Energy In: Proceedings of ICEE 2009. 3rd international conference on energy and envi-
Sources 2005;27:589–95. ronment. 2009.
[19] Datuk Leo Moggie Hon. National energy challenge: Malaysia’s power require- [51] Wahab AA, Mohd S, Dahalan MN, Mat S, Chong WT, Ismail MH, et al. Eqwin
ments; 2001. www.mint.gov.my/policy/nuc energy/metp95 asli.htm. turbine – the breakthrough for wind energy implementation in Malaysia. In:
[20] Byrd H. Energy and ecology: a view of Malaysia beyond 2020. Pulau Pinang: Proceedings of international conference on mechanical & manufacturing engi-
Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia; 2008. neering (ICME2008). 2008.
[21] Shigeoka H. Overview of international renewable energy policies and compar- [52] Najid SK, Zaharin A, Razali AM, Ibrahim K, Sopian K. Analyzing the east coast
ison with Malaysian’s domestic policy. School of Int’l & Public Affair Columbia Malaysia wind speed data. International Journal of Energy and Environment
University; 2004. 2009;3:53–60.
[22] Haris AH. Industry briefing on feed-in tariff procedures Kementerian Tenaga, [53] Koh SL, Lim YS. Preliminary investigation of the potential of harnessing tidal
Teknologi Hijau Dan Air; 2010. energy for electricity generation in Malaysia. In: T&D IEEE/PES transmission
[23] News Straits Times. Energy Solution is right here; 2009. and distribution conference & exposition. 2008.
[24] Shuit SH, Tan KT, Lee KT, Kamarudin AH. Oil palm biomass as a sustainable [54] Lim YS, Koh SL. Analytical assessments on the potential of harnessing
energy source: a Malaysia case study. Energy 2009;34:12245–21235. tidal currents for electricity generation in Malaysia. Renewable Energy
[25] Overview of the Malaysian Oil Palm Industry. Malaysia Palm Oil Board; 2009. 2010;35:1024–32.
[26] Abdullah AZ, Salamatinia B, Mootabadi H, Bhatia S. Current status and policies [55] Ang JB. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption
on biodiesel industry in Malaysia as the world’s leading producer of palm oil. in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling 2008;30:271–8.
Energy Policy 2009;37:5440–8. [56] Kong HW. Current status of biomass utilizations in Malaysia. Forest Research
[27] Jaafar MZ, Kheng WH, Kamaruddin WN. Greener energy solutions for Institute Malaysia; 2000.
a sustainable future: issues and challenges for Malaysia. Energy Policy [57] Jacobsson S, Johnson A. The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an
2003;31:1061–72. analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy 2000;28:
[28] Mokhtar H. Malaysia energy situation. EC-ASEAN COGEN program phase III. 625–40.
Malaysia: Shah Alam; 2002. [58] Mahlia TMI. Emissions from electricity generation in Malaysia. Renewable
[29] Husain Z, Zainal ZA, Abdullah MZ. Analysis of Biomass residue based cogener- Energy 2002;27:293–300.
ation system in palm oil mills. Biomass and Bioenergy 2003;24:117–24. [59] Amin AQ, Siwar C, Jaafar AH. Energy use and environmental impact of new
[30] Suruhanjaya Tenaga. Electricity supply industry in Malaysia. Performance and alternative fuel mix in electricity generation in Malaysia. The Open Renewable
Statistical Information; 2007. Energy Journal 2009;2:25–32.
[31] Northern Corridor Economic Region. Socioeconomic blueprint, 2007–2025 [60] Jafar AH, Al-Amin AQ, Siwar C. Environment impact of alternative fuel mix in
Koridor Utara. electricity generation in Malaysia. Renewable Energy 2008;33:2229–35.