Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stephanie Watkins
Dr. Brown
Info Literacy
My session focused on a hypothetical third grade class that was just starting their
nonfiction unit. I chose this age group because I currently teach this grade now and wanted to see
how it would go when teaching from a librarian perspective, rather than a teaching perspective. I
learned that the two were very related, but that I needed to look at the teaching from more of an
information literacy perspective. Many aspects went into this lesson in regards to theories and
knowledge of the grade level and their prior knowledge. My goals and objectives were also
intentionally based on their age level and their knowledge of nonfiction resources they could find
in the library. I evaluated the effectiveness of this skill by giving a formal and informal
assessment.
My lesson was geared toward a third grade classroom. This classroom was just
beginning their nonfiction unit. The students were starting this genre by completing an animal
research project. They already had in mind what animal they would be researching before
entering the library. This allowed me to better collaborate with the teacher by having already
accessed their prior knowledge and pulling books they would need for their project. My goal for
this mini lesson was to introduce students to one research method and how to access printed
books for information instead of doing a full read on the informational text needed for their
research projects. I focused on text features. Text features is an Oklahoma Third Grade Standard.
This standard from the Oklahoma State Department states that “the student will conduct research
Watkins 2
and organize information” (4). It also states the specific areas of focus being title page, table of
contents, glossary, chapter headings, charts, and indexes. These text features are what I focused
on in my Prezi presentation. I used an assessment after I taught these text features for the
students to practice their new skill. They had to locate the features in the book and also say how
having this new knowledge of text features would help them in their research project. My
objective of this lesson was to use my assessment to gauge their learning of the text features and
if they understood that the features were there to help them more easily access information. I also
accessed the American Association of School Librarian standards for the 21st century learner. I
used the standard 2.1.4 that ensures the student can “[u]se technology and other information
tools to analyze and organize information” (5). I embedded both library standards and Oklahoma
third grade standards to reach my goal of assisting students in acquiring their own information
important to know the students’ grade level and what they are capable of achieving. It is also
important to apply teaching theories in a lesson so that a desired outcome can be reached.
According to Mohammed Khalil and Ihsan Elkhider, authors of Applying learning theories and
instructional design models in effective instruction, it is imperative that teachers first refer back
to the science of learning to achieve an appropriate response to the lesson (2016, 147). My goal
for this lesson was to instill a skill that would help learners acquire their own information. I
wanted feedback to also guide my lesson. I knew that by giving students time to talk and
facilitate some their own learning would also make the lesson more effective. One of the
strategies that Khalil and Elkhider refer to is having a good attitude that draws the learner into
the lesson. If a student is not engaged, then their learning will not be as successful. I used this
Watkins 3
strategy in the beginning of my lesson by getting their attention and again when presenting the
Prezi. This article also discusses how it is imperative to allow students to be able to problem
solve and to have active participants. My lesson demonstrated this strategy in the review portion
of my lesson. It also brought in a problem solving strategy that allows students to demonstrate
My text feature lesson seemed to be effective over all. The students in my hypothetical
class understood my goal of the lesson and the intent. My introduction caught the attention of the
students. I let them know their hypothetical age group and led them into the lesson by describing
their prior knowledge. I think this helped in allowing them to put themselves in the position of a
third grader that is just beginning their nonfiction unit and has little knowledge or practice using
text features. I then began with showing my Prezi presentation. The presentation of the
standalone guide was a little rushed on my part. I knew I had only ten minutes to teach the lesson
and that caused my speech to be fast paced. I also received feedback on the presentation and that
I should have focused on one text feature instead of introducing them all at once. That was my
initial thought, but with the time limit and it being a one shot lesson, I decided to get them all in.
I agree, though, with the feedback and changed that in my Prezi afterwards. I think the lesson
would've been more affective if I would have just focused on one portion of text features and
allowed time to practice that skill. I decided that I could leave the other text features in my Prezi
so that I could turn it into mini lesson sessions for the time I next have that class scheduled. I
thought that it would be even more affective if the teacher could take the Prezi and use it in their
own classroom teaching. I thought this would make the co-teaching and collaboration aspect of
this lesson more successful also. I also like the review portion of my lesson. It allowed me to
have the students turn and talk to discuss how text features would help them in their own
Watkins 4
research projects. This allowed me to informally assess the effectiveness of the lesson. I was also
thinking that I could use this time to make any minor changes for when I taught the next
hypothetical class in the grade level. My wait time at the end is something I think should have
been longer. I think if the wait time would've been longer at the end, then I could've answered
more student’s questions. My assessment I gave at the end required students to log into a website
that allowed access to free nonfiction books. I demonstrated how to log onto this website and
how to select a book. I also think this portion of the lesson was effective because I think my
peers can take that resource into their own lessons. If both classes were in the same location, then
I would have used actual nonfiction printed books. I decided to use an online book so everyone
could access it. However, I think it was still effective in gauging the students new skill level and
This lesson definitely taught me a lot in terms of presentation and assessment. I give my
lesson credit by being able to present a goal and objective and get desirable results. Taking in
consideration the age group and their prior knowledge made the lesson more effective. I learned
that having an assessment that shows if the skill was taught effectively has an impact on the
teaching and reteaching. I decided that I will incorporate more wait time at the end of my lessons
in the future, in order to give students time to generate any questions they have about the skill. I
will also keep in mind the speed of my talking in making sure all students, like English Language
Learners, are understanding what I am saying. My over all goals and objectives were met in this
lesson and that showed through the video and the feedback from my evaluator.
Watkins 5
Bibliography