Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. CONSTRAINED_TIED_NODES_FAILURE
must take common node between the nodes of discrete units can be used ls-prepost or femp
implementation. Then by matlab write small programs, or other languages, for in the same position to
establish node node set, add * CONSTRAINED_TIED_NODES_FAILURE keywords. Use this method to
achieve crack simulate drawback is that preprocessing too much trouble. Application examples refer Baijin
Ze " lsdyna3d basic theory and case analysis. "
2. mat_add_eroson
about in this keyword Excerpts a lot of discussion, can search. It should be noted that, in lsdyna 971R4
previous versions, this material model brought the failure modes are only applicable to a single point of
integration of two-dimensional and three-dimensional solid elements. But in the R4 version later, this
keyword has been greatly improved:
in addition to limiting single-point integration, and also supports 3 -dimensional shell and thick
shell elements of type1 and type2 .
you can define the initial damage value, an increase of several injury model, specific reference
lsdyna 971R5 edition keywords.
7. personal summary
The following is a summary of the individual, not necessarily for reference purposes only.
1, with a unit failure or node failure to simulate the crack, which uses the methods herein 1-3,
the result largely dependent on the division of cells. Grid must draw a very fine, in order to get
crack senses.
using the contact with failure models or when spring unit to simulate crack, crack surface area
produced must be known, so this method is only applicable to a some special occasion.
when using a special material model to simulate crack, no method of claim unit 1-3 so high. The
disadvantage is that parameter setting is more complex, difficult to find in the current literature
about this model The material parameters. Document "Identi Fi cation of Gurson-Tvergaard
Material Model parameters viaKalman Fi lteringtechnique. I. Theory "this model to study the
influence of various parameters on the results, while setting parameters for reference
recommended EFG and XFEM Cohesive, these two methods should represent the development
direction of the crack of the simulation. Currently these two methods has been greatly
improved, but still not perfect, and the support of the unit is limited.
LSDYNA crack extensions are not crack front of the stress intensity factor, with Franc3d do think
crack is much more convenient.