Amanda Wilkes

Reflection Marking Rubric

Meets All Meets Most Approaches Does Not Meet

Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations
(4 points) (3 points) (2 points) (0 points)
Preparation: Self-evaluation was Self-evaluation was Self-evaluation was Self-evaluation was
Self-evaluation completed prior to completed prior to either only partly not completed
was thoughtfully review. Thoughtful review. Comments completed prior to prior to review.
completed prior to comments/insights are lacking and/or review or
scheduled review clearly documented. not insightful. completely lacking
with instructor. in comments.

(20 points)
Content: Clearly articulates All items are Some items from Areas of strength
Thoroughly what items were indicated as per instructions are and areas of
addresses all areas missed and describes instructions, but missing and/or improvement are
as per instructions. quality of may be lacking in 1 incomplete. not identified.
performance. area. Guiding
(50 points) Identifies in detail all criteria may not
areas of strength and have been fully used
areas for improvement to describe quality
Comments on overall of performance
performance are and/or summary is
thorough and identify lacking in 1-2 areas
specific strategies for for improvement.
improvement. 37.5
Depth of Response Response Response Response
Reflection demonstrates in-depth demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates a
reflection on and general reflection on minimal reflection lack of reflection.
(30 points) personalization of the and personalization on and Viewpoints are
process. of the process. personalization of missing,
Interpretations are Viewpoints and the group process. inappropriate or
insightful and well interpretations are Viewpoints and unsupported.
supported. Clear, somewhat interpretations are
detailed examples are supported. unsupported or with
provided as applicable. flawed arguments.
Examples if provided
are irrelevant to
topic.

87.5/100