Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Starbucks - coffee
Catastrophe bonds; insurance companies minimize
risk by issuing these bonds
High interest, but if disaster occurs, investors may
receive nothing; forfeiting the entire principal
United Services Automobile Association issued cat
bonds tied to hurricane damage; 1 – 1.5B damage,
investors lose a fraction of their principal; over 1.5B
damage, investors lose all; relatively little damage,
investors receive 12%
2006 World Cup insured against terrorism: 260M
cancellation bonds
An advantage to cat bonds is that they are not
correlated to financial markets
You can diversify with financial markets;
putting your eggs in different baskets
$1000 in a mutual fund, you are investing in
500 companies. That would cost too much in
fees to buy individual companies
You can invest in big and small companies,
long-term and short-term bonds,
international stocks and bonds, junk bonds
and real estate; some do well, some do poorly
Credit Default Swaps
Like lending money to your brother-in-
law, and buying insurance; if he doesn’t
pay, you’ll receive your money anyway. If
he does pay, you’re out the purchase price
of the insurance
#4 SPECULATION
You buy futures to mitigate risk; or bet on the
rise or fall of future prices
You buy bonds to help companies raise
capital; or you can bet on the rise or fall of
interest rates
You can invest in companies with the
intention to share in future profits; or you
can buy at 10am and sell for a profit at 2pm
What’s wrong with credit default swaps? –
anyone can get in on the action; if your
brother-in-law defaults, the losses can be
magnified 1000 times
In the events leading up to the crisis, buying
and selling CDS; maybe they didn’t do their
homework, maybe they didn’t care and were
earning bonuses for buying CDSs
AIG had sold insurance, basically
guaranteeing a lot of debt that went bad
It was like “picking up nickels in front of a
steamroller”: small profits for some years, but
horribly disastrous in another
AIG sold underpriced insurance on complex,
poorly understood securities
Las Vegas is a zero-sum game: you won’t win, the
house has better odds; it’s entertainment!
Wall Street is a positive sum game – things are
built, companies launched, risk managed
But, not all are winners; dot com companies, real
estate bubble, and the Wall Street meltdown
Financial markets are designed to allocate money
to where it can earn a high return
Hopefully not to some corrupt government official,
or some “entrepreneur” who is the king’s friend
Government can mess up the financial markets by
imposing burdensome taxes, regulation, diverting
funds to pet projects, refusing to allow creative
destruction to take place
Or, government can minimize fraud, force
transparency, create and enforce a regulatory
framework, provided public goods to lower the
cost of doing business
Teachable moments in the financial crisis:
regulatory system needs work
The challenge is to continue allocating
capital and mitigating risk while curtailing
excesses (stupid bets that the rest of us
must clean up)
How does one get rich in the markets?
“Are you rich enough?”
Real estate example: 3 storey single family
brownstone house; price range is 450k to 600k
If one is listed at 250k, you buy it and turn around
and sell it for 500k
Is the story true? No
1. Who’s the moron selling it?
2. Why didn’t the real estate agent buy it?
3. There are several smart investors who would have
bought it
Everyone wants to maximize their utility; no
one is going to leave 250k sitting on the table
Hot stocks?
Someone has to sell it for you to buy it
Maybe you know more? But the traders at
Goldman Sachs and Fidelity are not buying it?
What’s wrong here?
Do you know something that no one else
knows? (that’s illegal)
Analysts study the stocks: report on
management, future products, the industry,
the competition; but that is no guarantee that
you will earn an above-average return
EVERYONE ELSE HAS THE SAME
INFORMATION
The efficient markets theory: asset prices
reflect all available information
It’s difficult to choose stocks that will
outperform consistently
Picking stocks is like picking checkout lines at the
grocery market
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIPdI0ego3Q
Most professional stock pickers don’t meet the market
average
Everyone tries to pick the fastest line; sometimes right,
sometimes wrong
Unexpected occurrences like the surprise price check,
or the restating of income for Microstrategy in 2000
wherein the stock price dropped 62% in one day
Even large and well-established firms: Enron, or
Lehman Brothers
Proponents of EMT advise picking a line and staying
there; if equities are priced efficiently, throwing darts
is a good strategy
Malkiel says to throw a wet towel; index funds buy and
hold a predetermined basket of stocks. They are
cheaper to manage
Morningstar says slightly fewer than half of US actively
managed mutual funds beat the S&P 500 index
66% beat it over the last 5 years
45% beat it over the last 20 years: a monkey throwing
a wet towel beat 55% of professional money managers!
Economists and the 100$ bill
EMT is not popular on Wall Street
Housing market and stock market have not
behaved logically
Individual humans are flawed: prone to herd-
like behavior, are too confident in our own
abilities, place too much weight on past
trends when predicting the future
Individuals get it wrong; overreacting to good
and bad news: markets get it wrong; bubbles
and busts
Neuroeconomics has discovered those people with
damage to emotional part of the brain are better
investors: took more risks when potential payoffs were
high and got less emotional when they made losses
Robert Schiller challenged EMT with the book
Irrational Exuberance; it argued the stock market was
overvalued, and later he argued there was a housing
bubble
Thaler made a mutual fund that would take advantage
of human imperfections; has made 4.5% since its
inception compared to S&P500’s 2.3%
Markets may be occasionally irrational, but
the free lunch is not available to too long
Like a checkout line, if a mutual fund starts
doing well, then others will copy the strategy,
making it less effective
With supercomputers and special expertise,
you may find price anomalies, but without,
it’s best to simply buy an index fund
Indexing is a good starting point
SAVE, INVEST, REPEAT
Compound interest; Einstein quote
Save early, save often, pay off your credit cards