Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 External links
[edit] History
The publication of Emerson's 1836 essay "Nature" is usually taken to be the
watershed moment at which Transcendentalism became a major cultural movement.
Emerson wrote in his essay "The American Scholar": "We will walk on our own feet; we
will work with our own hands; we will speak our own minds ... A nation of men will for
the first time exist, because each believes himself inspired by the Divine Soul which also
inspires all men." Emerson closed the essay by calling for a revolution in human
consciousness to emerge from the new idealist philosophy:
So shall we come to look at the world with new eyes. It shall answer the endless
inquiry of the intellect, — What is truth? and of the affections, — What is good? by
yielding itself passive to the educated Will. ... Build, therefore, your own world. As
fast as you conform your life to the pure idea in your mind, that will unfold its great
proportions. A correspondent revolution in things will attend the influx of the spirit.
In the same year, Transcendentalism became a coherent movement with the founding
of the Transcendental Club in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on September 8, 1836, by
prominent New England intellectuals including George Putnam, Ralph Waldo Emerson,
and Frederick Henry Hedge. From 1840, the group published frequently in their journal
The Dial, along with other venues.
The practical aims of the Transcendentalists were varied; some among the group
linked it with utopian social change (and, in the case of Brownson, it joined explicitly with
early socialism), while others found it an exclusively individual and idealist project.
Emerson believed the latter. In his 1842 lecture "The Transcendentalist", Emerson
suggested that the goal of a purely Transcendental outlook on life was impossible to
attain in practice:
You will see by this sketch that there is no such thing as a Transcendental party; that
there is no pure Transcendentalist; that we know of no one but prophets and heralds of
such a philosophy; that all who by strong bias of nature have leaned to the spiritual
side in doctrine, have stopped short of their goal. We have had many harbingers and
forerunners; but of a purely spiritual life, history has afforded no example. I mean, we
have yet no man who has leaned entirely on his character, and eaten angels' food; who,
trusting to his sentiments, found life made of miracles; who, working for universal
aims, found himself fed, he knew not how; clothed, sheltered, and weaponed, he knew
not how, and yet it was done by his own hands. ... Shall we say, then, that
Transcendentalism is the Saturnalia or excess of Faith; the presentiment of a faith
proper to man in his integrity, excessive only when his imperfect obedience hinders
the satisfaction of his wish.
Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote a novel, The Blithedale Romance, satirizing the
movement, and based it on his experiences at Brook Farm, a short-lived utopian
community founded on Transcendental principles.
[edit] Origins
Transcendentalism was rooted in the transcendental philosophy of Immanuel Kant
(and of German Idealism more generally), which the New England intellectuals of the
early 19th century embraced as an alternative to the Lockean "sensualism" of their
fathers and of the Unitarian church, finding this alternative in Vedic thought, German
idealism, and English Romanticism.
The Transcendentalists desired to ground their religion and philosophy in
transcendental principles: principles not based on, or falsifiable by, sensuous experience,
but deriving from the inner, spiritual or mental essence of the human. Kant had called "all
knowledge transcendental which is concerned not with objects but with our mode of
knowing objects." The Transcendentalists were largely unacquainted with German
philosophy in the original, and relied primarily on the writings of Thomas Carlyle, Samuel
Taylor Coleridge, Victor Cousin, Germaine de Staël, and other English and French
commentators for their knowledge of it. In contrast, they were intimately familiar with
the English Romantics, and the Transcendental movement may be partially described as a
slightly later, American outgrowth of Romanticism. Another major influence was the
mystical spiritualism of Emanuel Swedenborg.
Thoreau in Walden spoke of the debt to the Vedic thought directly, as did other
members of the movement:
In the morning I bathe my intellect in the stupendous and cosmogonal philosophy of
the Bhagavat Geeta, since whose composition years of the gods have elapsed, and in
comparison with which our modern world and its literature seem puny and trivial; and
I doubt if that philosophy is not to be referred to a previous state of existence, so
remote is its sublimity from our conceptions. I lay down the book and go to my well
for water, and lo! there I meet the servant of the Brahmin, priest of Brahma, and
Vishnu and Indra, who still sits in his temple on the Ganges reading the Vedas, or
dwells at the root of a tree with his crust and water-jug. I meet his servant come to
draw water for his master, and our buckets as it were grate together in the same well.
The pure Walden water is mingled with the sacred water of the Ganges.
Biography
Henry David Thoreau was a complex man of many talents who worked hard to shape his craft and his life,
seeing little difference between them. Born in 1817, one of his first memories was of staying awake at night
"looking through the stars to see if I could see God behind them." One might say he never stopped looking into
nature for ultimate Truth.
Henry grew up very close to his older brother John, who taught school to help pay for Henry's tuition at
Harvard. While there, Henry read a small book by his Concord neighbor, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Nature, and in a
sense he never finished exploring its ideas -- although always definitely on his own terms, just as he explored
everything! He and his brother taught school for a while but in 1842, John cut himself while shaving and died of
lockjaw in his brother's arms, an untimely death which traumatized the 25 year old Henry. He worked for several
years as a surveyor and making pencils with his father, but at the age of 28 in 1845, wanting to write his first
book, he went to Walden pond and built his cabin on land owned by Emerson
While at Walden, Thoreau did an incredible amount of reading and writing, yet he also spent much time
"sauntering" in nature. He gave a lecture and was imprisoned briefly for not paying his poll tax, but mostly he
wrote a book as a memorial to a river trip he had taken with his brother, A Week on the Concord and Merrimack
Rivers .
After two years (and two months), Thoreau returned to Concord -- a bare two miles away which he had visited
frequently during his stay at the pond, having completed his experiment in living and his book. Unfortunately, few
people were interested in purchasing his book, so he spent the next nine years, surveying and making pencils at
times but primarily writing and rewriting (creating seven full drafts) Walden before trying to publish it.
He supported himself by surveying and making a few lectures, often on his experience at Walden pond.
Many readers mistake Henry's tone in Walden and other works, thinking he was a cranky hermit. That was far
from the case, as one of his young neighbors and Edward Emerson attest. He found greater joy in his daily life
than most people ever would.
He traveled often, to the Maine woods and to Cape Cod several times, and was particularly interested in the
frontier and Indians. He opposed the government for waging the Mexican war (to extend slavery) eloquently in
Resistance to Civil Government, based on his brief experience in jail; he lectured against slavery in an abolitionist
lecture, Slavery in Massachusetts. He even supported John Brown's efforts to end slavery after meeting him in
Concord, as in A Plea for Captain John Brown.
Thoreau died of tuberculosis in 1862, at the age of 44. His last words were said to be "Moose" and "Indian."
Not only did he leave his two books and numerous essays, but he also left a huge Journal , published later in 20
volumes, which may have been his major work-in-progress. Many memorials were penned by his friends,
including Emerson's eulogy and Louisa May Alcott's poem, "Thoreau's Flute."
Over the years, Thoreau's reputation has been strong, although he is often cast into roles -- the hermit in the
wilderness, the prophet of passive resistance (so dear to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King) -- that he
would have surely seen as somewhat alien. His work is so rich, and so full of the complex contradictions that he
explored, that his readers keep reshaping his image to fit their own needs. Perhaps he would have appreciated
that, for he seems to have wanted most to use words to force his readers to rethink their own lives creatively,
different though they may be, even as he spent his life rethinking his, always asking questions, always looking to
nature for greater intensity and meaning for his life.
Ann Woodlief
Insofar as American thought is concerned, there seem to be two distinct lines of thought concerning Nature.
One, which had among its proponents the bulk of colonial Americans, is that Nature—-the wilderness, more
accurately—-is a foreign, rather fearful entity that must be dealt with by taming it. It is not uncommon for the
wilderness to be referred to as a "desert" in early American writing. We must remember the writers were most
often speaking of the lush green wildness of the mid-Atlantic and New England states when they used this term!
Nature was unpredictable, irrational, and vaguely feminine and bad. According to this view, the main purpose of
Nature is how it may serve mankind; it has little value in itself if left in a "natural" state. Evolving from this fearful
outlook is the attitude contained in the word "frontier," which translates as opportunity; the frontier is a tabula
rasa commodity, a blank slate available to anyone with the guts, willpower, and means to inscribe his name.
Again, it has little or no value in itself but only in its potential offering to the prospective owner. Once owned, it is
of course no longer "frontier" but merely "property."
The second line of thought—-which most Americans espouse today in theory, at least, if not in actual practice
—-is that Nature is a good entity and valuable on its own unique terms, as itself, without regard to the purposes of
mankind. However, it's very difficult to escape our Puritan/Yankee heritage. (Yankee is used in a pre-Civil War
sense here). We still ask of Nature: what good is it? Even that we want left strictly alone in its pristine wild beauty
is unmolested because we've already taken what we wanted: the idea of a place still with clean air, water, animals.
This desire was the driving force behind the creation of the National Parks: we want to preserve not Nature,
exactly, but the loveliness of it. While one surely cannot argue with the positive result of such a desire, nonetheless
it goes right back to "What good is it?" To value Nature strictly as itself without any regard to profit, financial,
spiritual, or otherwise, seems an impossible task.
Meg Brulatour
What strikes me the most in each of the readings, not only in Emerson's Nature is the intense connection
made between spirituality and nature. It is certainly present in Thoreau's texts; Walden and "Walking" are
probably the best examples. The entirety of "Walking" seems to be an extended metaphor for pushing forward, not
only physically, but mentally and spiritually as well. Without nature, we wouldn't survive in any manner:
physically, emotionally, mentally or most of all spiritually. Thoreau seems to endorse a constant communion with
nature. Obviously, he devotes his life to it, in what we learn from Walden.
Emerson, while endorsing a similar type of philosophy of nature, seems more stringent in his ideas of nature
and less stringent in his actual communion with nature. Of course, this could be false. It might be his writing style
and authoritative tone that seem to preach more than practice. Emerson gives few personal examples, so readers
really don't know if he lives in the way that he suggests readers or listeners live. Emerson seems to focus a great
deal on the ties between nature and the spirit. He tells readers what the connections are. Thoreau, on the other
hand, often shows us the connections, but leaves it up to us to make them in our own minds.
Ellen Moore
Jan Hokeš
Člověk nemá helmu, zato kormidlo
Čtenář, který sahá po knize esejů Ralpha Walda Emersona Sebedůvěra, sebejistota,
nezávislost, jsa nalákán jménem myslitelské autority devatenáctého věku, bude po otevření
knihy zklamán, ten poučenější dokonce rozhořčen. To, co vydává nakladatelství Pragma za
překlad Emersona, nemá totiž se skutečným Emersonem mnoho společného.
Americký spisovatel, básník, kazatel a myslitel Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) položil v
první polovině devatenáctého století základy tamějšího transcendentalistického hnutí, jehož
byl sám ústřední postavou. Základní myšlenky a hodnoty hnutí vyložil v jednom ze svých
nejvýznamnějších textů nazvaném Příroda (Nature), poprvé publikovaném v roce 1836, a v
první sérii svých esejů o pět let později. Druhá série následovala v roce 1844. Význam
Emersonových děl bývá občas zhuštěn do známých citátů o výstřelu, „který slyšel celý svět“,
nebo o tom, že „za peníze platíme často příliš velkou cenu“, ale jejich skutečný dopad nejen
na americkou společnost a způsob uvažování je mnohem větší a širší. Stačí vzít v potaz už jen
Emersonovo vnímání zkušenosti jakožto záležitosti osobní a vnitřní (nikoliv tedy veřejné a
vnější), která myšlenky nejen ověřuje, ale stejně tak je vytváří. Důležitý byl také jeho důraz
na jedince a jeho samostatnost a nezávislost, čemuž je věnována celý esej Sebedůvěra (Self-
Reliance).
Že by idealistický esoterik?
A právě podle tohoto eseje je pojmenována kniha, kterou v roce 1991 uspořádal editor
Richard Whelan a loni ji pod názvem Sebedůvěra, sebejistota, nezávislost vydalo
nakladatelství Pragma v českém překladu Pavlíny Dunovské. Whelan se tímto svým
editorským počinem pokusil zpřístupnit Emersonovy myšlenky dnešnímu čtenáři. Kromě již
zmíněné Přírody a eseje Transcendentalista vybral dalších čtrnáct Emersonových textů z obou
sérií. Z nich navíc, na základě vlastní četby, vyňal pouze ty pasáže, které sám považoval za
nejdůležitější. Spoustu vět, odstavců i celých stránek shledal nadbytečnými a texty tak zkrátil
na jejich pouhé zlomky. Tím se z Emersonových děl staly leckdy nepříliš propojené a z
kontextu vytržené pasáže. Ponechme stranou Whelanovu schopnost skutečně vybrat pouze
„jádro“ esejů a také to, zda by si takové dílo nezasloužilo spíše nezkrácené vydání s
komentáři. Ve svém úvodu ke knize se však Whelan až příliš zaměřuje na vše božské a
duchovní, prakticky opomíjí Emersonův vliv na transcendentalistické hnutí i celou společnost
a z autora činí jakéhosi idealistického esoterika.
Tomu odpovídá i zařazení knihy do sekce Esoterika na internetových stránkách Pragmy, kde
jsou v její anotaci uvedena přinejmenším diskutabilní „fakta“. Podtitul zní Moudrost jako
inspirace pro každodenní život. Ano, i tak lze určitě některé části Emersonových textů chápat,
ovšem po přečtení prvních pár stránek jakékoliv zde uvedeného eseje se čtenář neubrání
pocitu, že autor musel být ne esoterik a idealista, ale přinejmenším blázen píšící neskutečné
bláboly, z nichž si jen těžko něco vezmeme do každodenního života. Po srovnání s anglickými
originály si můžete ulehčeně vydechnout – v angličtině dávají Emersonovy myšlenky smysl.
Ne tak v naprosto děsivém a méně než amatérském překladu Pavlíny Dunovské, která nejenže
nechápe struktury anglických vět, ale navíc ani příliš nepracuje – nebo neumí pracovat – se
slovníkem a nijak se nezatěžuje tím, že tvoří nesmysly.
Přečtěte si Bibli
Podívejme se na několik mimořádně křiklavých příkladů: „Lidé, kteří dosáhli vynikajících
úspěchů, ve svých upřímných chvílích vždycky prozpěvovali: ,Ne z nás, ne z nás.‘“ (str. 44,
Duchovní zákony) Pomineme-li styl a stavbu této věty, zůstává tu ještě otázka, co že si to ti
lidé prozpěvovali. Nedá moc práce zjistit, že Emerson použil část citátu z Bible, konkrétně z
žalmu 115:1: „Ne nám, pane, ne nám“, který dále pokračuje slovy: „(...) ale svému jménu dej
slávu.“ V eseji Absolutno (str. 60) se zase čtenář dozví, že „Srdce, které opouští samo sebe pro
nejvyšší mysl, se nalézá spojeno se vší svou prací ...“ V originále se však nepíše o žádném
opouštění, ale o srdci, které se „oddá Nejvyšší mysli“.
Poslední příklad může vypadat jako špatný vtip Pavlíny Dunovské. Vzhledem k tomu, nakolik
činí z Emersonových děl nesmyslné paskvily, působí ovšem spíše smutně: „Klíčem ke
každému člověku je jeho myšlenka. Ať vypadá sebesilněji, má přilbu, kterou poslouchá.“
Jestli tohle dávalo překladatelce smysl, pak si zaslouží hluboký obdiv. Emerson nepíše o
žádné přilbě, byť slovo „helm“ se tak může Čechovi jevit. Jedná se ale o výraz pro
„kormidlo“ – stačí nahlédnout do slovníku. Člověk tedy nemá „přilbu“, ale kormidlo, kterým
se řídí.
Čtenářům se zájmem o eseje Ralpha Walda Emersona tedy nezbývá než se spokojit s hodně
starými českými verzemi, Sebedůvěrou vydanou česky před jedenácti lety, či s vydáním osmi
esejů ve slovenštině z roku 1991, a doufat, že se dočkají ucelené publikace s kvalitním
českým překladem a odbornými komentáři. Jinou možností je přečíst si Emersona v originále,
a pokud nemáte potřebné znalosti jazyka, vyplatí se určitě raději investovat do kurzu
angličtiny, než do nového vydání knihy Sebedůvěra, sebejistota, nezávislost. Devalvace
překladem je bohužel značná.
Poselství Waldenu
Prozaik F. Scott Fitzgerald si roku 1938 v dopise své dceři posteskl, že si až po četbě
Thoreaua uvědomil, co minul v životě, když z něj vynechal přírodu. Tato slova, domnívám
se, znamenají více než pouhou lítost věhlasného autora příběhů z uspěchaného
metropolitního života v jazzovém věku, když mu došlo, jak málo času strávil v lesích, na
horách či na divoké vodě; v jeho slovech zaznívá i zklamání nad životem, který sám žil a
o němž psal, nad hierarchií hodnot, kterou se řídil svět kolem něj i svět jeho literárních
hrdinů. I Fitzgeraldův Gatsby mohl dojít k Thoreauovu závěru, že „na to, co potřebuje
duše, není třeba peněz“, ale pokud tomu tak bylo, přišlo jeho poznání už příliš pozdě.
Henry David Thoreau o století dříve právě z přírody a ze života v její blízkosti či přímo
v jejím lůně vyčetl mnohé, co nabídl svým současníkům jako poznatek, radu či varování a
co z dnešního pohledu získalo mnohdy navíc rozměr prorocký. Tento bytostný ekolog již
dlouho před vznikem ekologie šířil svou víru, že příroda je bližším přítelem lidské duše
než společnost, že člověk je ve své podstatě tvorem více přírodním než společenským.
Neznamenalo to, že Thoreau vyzýval současníky, aby žili jako přírodní národy či aby
následovali jeho vlastního příkladu a uchylovali se do lesní samoty; šlo mu o to, aby
příslušníci naši civilizace nezapomínali, odkud vývojově vyšli a kam svou podstatou
nadále patří. „Necháme-li se vést jemným magnetismem existujícím v přírodě, půjdeme
správným směrem,“ napsal v eseji Chození (Walking, 1862), který vyšel v roce autorovy
smrti a je možno jej i proto považovat za jakýsi ideový testament; právě v něm
nacházíme též pregnantně formulované memento směřující k příštím generacím a
důrazně připomínající, že „v divokosti je záchrana světa“.
Thoreau ovšem nebyl romantický snílek, nýbrž člověk spíše praktický; nebyl to
divošský primitiv, ale vzdělaný intelektuál. Už v rodině, která sídlila v novoanglickém
Concordu, kde se David Henry 12. července 1817 narodil, byla pevně zakotvena tradice
zájmu o přírodu a vzdělání. Je vlastně symbolicky výmluvné, že se Thoreauovi zabývali a
živili zemědělstvím a výrobou tužek, protože právě psaní o přírodě a inspiraci přírodou se
mělo stát životním posláním Henryho Davida (k prohození pořadí jmen se sám rozhodl ve
dvaceti letech). Jako zdroje poznání kombinoval Thoreau po celý život přímé pozorování
přírody se studiem přírodovědných knih. Touha psát o tom, co viděl a žil a o čem
přemýšlel, však vycházela nejen z osobních zkušeností s přírodou, ale též s literaturou. V
letech harvardského studia jej hluboce zaujali klasičtí autoři řečtí a římští, a to jako
umělci i myslitelé. Jako absolvent mohl po návratu do Concordu číst v originále nejen díla
jejich, ale i literaturu prakticky všech moderních evropských národů. Henry David
Thoreau se vlastně nadevše cítil být a pro nás především zůstává literátem – psaní pro
něj bylo tím nejvyšším konáním, formou potvrzení a povznesení žité skutečnosti. Jeho
dílo představuje přibližně třicet svazků, z nichž první řádky a stránky zápisků si začal vést
už jako student. Psal i několik hodin denně, jako by se potřeboval propsat k
sebeuvědomění, k poznání a pochopení světa a vesmíru.
Pohled na rukopis Waldenu naznačuje, že difinitivní verzi předchází sedm pokusů; její
výrazová dokonalost však není jen výsledkem formálního, ale i logického, myšlenkového
tříbení. Thoreauův styl je diktován především hledáním „nejpřímější cesty k pravdě“.
Autor jazykově vychází většinou z konkrétního, mnohdy přímo osobního prožitku či
postřehu, takže ani abstraktní pasáže neztrácejí na přehlednosti a přesvědčivosti; čerpá
sílu z idiomu přirozené novoanglické řeči i ze zálibného zvládnutí rétoriky antických
mistrů, z biblických rytmů a formulací a z obrazné argumentace východních myslitelů.
Navíc má Walden jako celek promyšlenou a procítěnou kompozici, jíž je podpořeno
dynamické vnímáni knihy jako rezonance mýtického procesu individuálního probouzení v
rámci ročního cyklu, který se odvíjí od starého léta k novému jaru. Právě z onoho
důvodu, aby dosáhl smysluplné sevřenosti, stáhl autor v knize zážitky svých skutečných
dvou let u Waldenského rybníka do roku jediného. Symbolická jistě měla být a byla volba
4. července, tedy Dne národní nezávislosti, jako momentu, kdy se autor rozhoduje
osvobodit se od concordské a vůbec americké společnosti, kterou stále citelněji
poznamenávalo „prokletí trhu“. Zvolil jako „druha nejdružnějšího“ samotu, aby mohl „žít
chlapsky a spartánsky“ a aby „dokázal odmrštit všechno, co není životem“.
Dnes víme, že kniha, která vyšla pod názvem Walden aneb Život v lesích (Walden, or
Life in the Woods) roku 1854, tedy celých sedm let po Thoreauově návratu z osamělé
chatky u rybníka, není ani zdaleka pouhým záznamem autorovy zkušenosti; je zajímavou
duchovní biografií a kontemplací nad vztahem člověka a přírody, nad smyslem života a
existence. Moderní americký kritik Alfred Kazin nazval toto dílo „pečlivě vybudovaným
oltářem“, čímž ocenil nejen jeho estetickou působivost, ale i rituálovou funkčnost. Čtenáři
pragmatičtí čtou Walden jinak než filozofové, k ekologům může promlouvat jinak než k
ekonomům, ale o jeho aktuálnosti mluví stále nová a nová vydání v angličtině i v
překladech po celém světě. (Český překlad Zdeňka Franty z roku 1902 byl časově
předstižen snad jen v Německu, ale i verze Miloše Seiferta z roku 1924 patřila ještě k
ranější překladové vlně.)
Thoreau sám nazval Walden svým „zakokrháním světu“. Už v jeho době měla být
kniha varováním před rostoucími materiálními zájmy lidí, před honbou za penězi, před
ochuzováním ducha, před nebezpečím, že shánění životních prostředků bude zaměněno
za životní cíl a že zdání mohou lidé mylně považovat za skutečnost. Autor vyzýval k
přirozenosti a prostotě, protože věřil, že „nadbytečné bohatství může si koupit jen věci
nadbytečné“. Marnost Thoreauova volání bolí svět dnes možná více, než tomu mohlo být
v polovině předminulého století. Zdá se, že zvláště naléhavého posouzení si vyžadují jeho
myšlenky týkající se volného času, který na rozdíl od svých současníků nepovažoval za
zahálku, nýbrž za skutečné naplnění lidského života. Je přirozené, že ve společnosti
řízené principem protestantské pracovní morálky, jako byla ta jeho, či ve společnosti,
která je hnána touhou po materiálních statcích, jako je ta naše, neměla podobná
myšlenka moc naděje na obecné pochopení či přijetí.
Jediná skupina lidí, která byla pro Thoreaua kromě jeho vlastní rodiny zajímavá, byli
členové Transcendentálního klubu v Concordu, v jehož čele stál uznávaný kritik, esejista
a básník Ralph Waldo Emerson, který je obecně považován též za Thoreauova mentora.
Myšlenky transcendentalismu vzešly ze střetnutí idejí novoanglického puritanismu a
evropského romantismu a znamenaly vlastně první vědomý pokus o kulturní sebeurčení
Američanů jako národa; klíčovou úlohu v tomto procesu mělo mít chápání přírody jako
výrazu duchovna, jako prostředí, v němž je možno realizovat rozhovor s Bohem i vlastní
duší, kde je možno poznat i sama sebe. Emersonova knížečka Příroda, která vyšla v roce
1836, byla prvním impulsem novému kulturnímu hnutí a Thoreau v ní našel potvrzení
toho, co sám cítil, ale nedovedl zatím formulovat. Emerson, vyzývající Ameriku i každého
jedince k myšlenkové svébytnosti, měl u Thoreaua absolutní úspěch. Žák, inspirovaný
svým o čtrnáct let starším učitelem, vykročil naznačeným směrem a brzy zcela
samostatně zásady transcendentalismu prakticky realizoval. Své první verše a přírodní
eseje uveřejnil ve skupinovém časopise Sluneční hodiny (Dial), na popud Emersonův
začal psát svůj celoživotní deník. Roku 1839 sjel Thoreau se svým bratrem Johnem dvě
novoanglické řeky na člunu, který sami vyrobili, a poznámky z této cesty použil Henry za
pozdějšího pobytu u Waldenu k napsání své první knihy Týden na řekách Concordu a
Merrimacku (A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, 1849); vyšla až čtyři roky po
dopsání, a to v nákladu jednoho tisíce výtisků, z nichž více než dvě třetiny poslal
nakladatel za čtyři další roky autorovi domů jako neprodejné, a ten tehdy s trpkým
humorem konstatoval, že je majitelem knihovny o devíti stovkách svazků, z nichž sedm
set napsal sám. Stejně jako ostatní významní transcendentalisté, včetně Nathaniela
Hawthorna a Hermana Melvilla, stál Thoreau v průběhu své autorské kariéry nejednou
před dilematem, jak se vyhnout populárnějšímu způsobu psaní a přitom se nevzdat touhy
oslovit a ovlivnit pokud možno co největší publikum. Být romanticky svůj a současně chtít
být společensky či dokonce komerčně úspěšný nebylo zdaleka snadné, a to ani v době
Thoreauově.
Emerson proto svému mladšímu příteli poskytoval nejen duchovní inspiraci, ale v době
materiální nouze také pracovní příležitosti a střechu nad hlavou. Thoreau se staral o
domácnost a dělal společnost též paní domu, o níž mluvil jako o starší sestře. U dětí
Emersonova bratra na Staten Islandu měl Thoreau dělat učitele, ale v New Yorku se
necítil dobře a brzy se vrátil opět do Concordu. Emersonovi patřila také lesní parcela u
Waldenského rybníka, kde si Thoreau postavil srub, v němž prožil ony nejpamátnější dva
roky svého života (4. 7. 1845–6. 9. 1847). U Emersonů měl možnost setkat se s řadou
osobností tehdejšího literárního a kulturního života, mezi nimiž byl kromě Hawthorna
také liberální duchovní (zakladatel unitářské církve) a abolicionista William Ellery
Channing, údajně Thoreauův nejbližší přítel, který jej doprovázel na některých dlouhých
pěších túrách. O všech si Thoreau vedl podrobné zápisy, ale po Waldenu mu už žádná z
knih do jeho smrti nevyšla. Zemřel na tuberkulózu 6. května 1862 a jeho poslední slova
byla „los“ a „Indián“. Právě o původních obyvatelích Ameriky chtěl Thoreau napsat velkou
knihu, ale i když materiál k ní sbíral po mnoho let, nikdy ji nedokončil. Péčí autorových
přátel byly publikovány tituly Lesy v Mainu (The Maine Woods, 1864), Výlety (Excursions,
1863), Mys tresky (Cape Cod, 1865), Yankee v Kanadě (Yankee in Canada, 1866) a
později ještě řada dalších.
Ti, kdo se zabývají historií přírodního eseje jako moderního žánru, se shodují v tom,
že jeho počátek je nerozlučně spojen se jménem Thoreauovým. Už jeho první esej
Přírodní dějiny Massachusetts (A Natural History of Massachusetts), otištěný v časopise
Sluneční hodiny roku 1842, ukázal na možnosti, jaké tato forma má, když staví na
pravdivě zobrazeném vědeckém faktu a osobně viděném a cítěném poznatku či prožitku
jako východiscích k filozofickému uchopení lidské zkušenosti. Skutečnost, že Thoreau ve
svých přírodních prózách překonal tehdy stále ještě existující puritánské vidění přírody a
civilizace jako dvou antagonistických pojmů a rozehnal představy divočiny jako něčeho
temného a zlovolného, protože nepoznaného, otevřela nové pohledy na přírodu a
zvýraznila význam její celistvosti, která zahrnuje i člověka a jeho společnost. Thoreau
spolu s Johnem Muirem, Johnem Burroughsem a dalšími přírodními esejisty
devatenáctého století silně ovlivnili americké smýšlení o přírodě a zcela jistě pomohli
formulovat i konkrétní postoje a chování k ní. Byl to ostatně Thoreau, kdo spolu s
věhlasným malířem amerických Indiánů Georgem Catlinem, přišel roku 1858 s ideou
vybraná přírodní teritoria chránit a zachovat jako národní rezervace. Jak se posunovalo
„civilizační pomezí“ směrem na Západ, došlo jistě na území Spojených států i
k necitlivému a přímo nelítostnému drancování přírody, současně je však třeba si
připomenout, že historicky vůbec první národní parky byly ty americké. Yellowstonský byl
založen již v roce 1872.
Kalifornský básník a esejista Gary Snyder thoreauovskou myšlenku o síle naděje, již je
možno vkládat do přírodní „divoké mysli“, obohacuje o dimenze etické a estetické. Z jeho
představ o „nové přírodní poetice“ vychází báseň jako „ekologický návod k zachování
života“. Snyder ke svému chápání poezie a ke svým varováním a doporučením
adresovaným naší civilizaci došel studiem filozofií Orientu a „primitivních“ kultur
původních obyvatel amerického kontinentu. Stejně jako Thoreau posílil své meditace
dělným životem v divočině. A tak se nelze divit, když recenzenti jeho esejistické soubory
Praxe divočiny (The Practice of the Wild, 1992) a Místo v prostoru (A Place in Space,
1995) vítali i jako novodobé reflexe Waldenu.
Lidé si brali a zřejmě budou brát ze Thoreauových slov, co sami potřebují; hledají v
jeho próze, krásně vyjádřeno, co se v nich samých teprve nejasně formuje. Jistě si nikdy
nemohl uvědomit, za kolik lidí promlouvá, když mluvil za sebe a k sobě. Na hnutí
mladých Američanů v šedesátých letech našeho století zapůsobil svým životním stylem a
slovy o právu každého jedince kráčet v tomto světě podle rytmu vlastního „bubeníka“. My
bychom měli zvláště po zkušenostech z porevoluční transformace Thoreauovi naslouchat,
když říká, že jen reformy vnitřní jsou opravdové a že skutečné a hluboké změny ve
vztazích mezi lidmi mohou vyplynout jen ze změn v lidech samých. Nejužitečnější
zásadou při četbě Thoreaua ovšem bude řídit se jeho vlastní radou, že „knihy je nutno
číst se stejným rozmyslem a odstupem, jak byly psány“. Ale hlavně, že je třeba takové
knihy nepřestat číst.
Jan Hokeš
Umění Chůze
Umíte si představit den, ve kterém byste neprochodili nejméně čtyři hodiny?
Autor Waldenu a Občanské neposlušnosti, pacifista, odpůrce daní a kritik
modernity Henry David Thoreau, si takový představit nedovedl. Nad jeho pozdní
esejí Chůze se zamýšlí pedagog a překladatel Jan Hokeš.
„Procházet se s ním bylo potěšením a poctou. Krajinu znal jako liška nebo pták
a stejně jako oni jí procházel volně svými vlastními stezkami... Takovému průvodci se
musel člověk poslušně podřídit a odměna za to byla obrovská.“ Tato slova napsal
o Henrym Davidu Thoreauovi jeho přítel a mentor Ralph Waldo Emerson ve své pohřební
řeči vydané později pod názvem Thoreau.
Thoreau byl skutečně náruživým chodcem a podle svých vlastních slov si nedokázal
představit den, kdy by nestrávil nejméně čtyři hodiny chůzí. Na svých výletech se často
setkával s různými formami divokosti, ať už se jednalo o indiány (a o ně měl velký zájem
a stýkal se s nimi), divoká jablka, trávy, ondatry, sviště nebo jiné rostlinné či živočišné
formy divočiny, jak sám říkal. Jak je patrné z jeho deníků z konce roku 1850 a začátku
roku 1851, ona divočina ho fascinovala. Tato fascinace pak logicky vyústila v přednášku
Divočina (později Divočina aneb Chůze), kterou poprvé uvedl v dubnu 1851. V průběhu
následujících let se z ní vyvinula esej Chůze (angl. Walking), dokončená v květnu 1862 —
tedy jen krátce před jeho smrtí.
Rytířský řád Chodců
Je-li Walden považován za Thoreauovu ústřední knihu, pak Chůzi lze pokládat za
jednu z jeho ústředních esejí. Hned v jejím úvodu se dočteme, že Thoreau nepovažuje
člověka ani tak za tvora společenského, za člena společnosti, jako spíše za součást
přírody. Vysvětluje, co pro něj znamená být chodcem a porozumět „umění Chůze“. Ta pro
něho není pouhým pohybem nebo tělesným cvičením, ale spíše druhem psychické
činnosti. Pokud si s sebou do lesů a luk odnášíte své starosti a závazky z města, pak
nejste pro chůzi patřičně vybaveni a nemůžete se jí plně oddat, a vstoupit tak do
nejstaršího rytířského řádu Chodců, který je jakýmsi „čtvrtým stavem mimo církev, stát
a lid“. Kapitálem v tomto umění je volný čas, svoboda a nezávislost, které vám nemůže
zajistit žádné bohatství. „Chodcem se člověk rodí, ne stává,“ uvádí Thoreau, a vytváří tak
dojem určité výlučnosti, která z řádu dělá spíše cosi jako kastu. Pravděpodobně nemá na
mysli skutečnou předurčenost, ale chce ještě více zdůraznit, že svobodu potřebnou
k tomuto povolání nelze získat sezením v obchodech a kancelářích, k němuž je
odsouzena spousta jeho spoluobčanů.
Bohatství sice může člověku zajistit prostředky k vlastnictví krajiny, v níž se lze
procházet podle libosti, ale přesně to vidí Thoreau jako chybu: „Těšit se z nějaké věci
výlučně obvykle znamená připravit sám sebe o skutečné potěšení z ní.“ Pochvaluje si, že
v jeho okolí se vyskytuje stále dostatek krajiny, která není v soukromých rukou, a tudíž
může být volně užívána k chůzi. Zároveň se však dívá do budoucnosti a předpovídá den,
kdy bude tato země rozdělena na kousky, z nichž budou mít radost jen jejich majitelé. Ti
zesílí své ploty a vyvinou ochranné prostředky, které chodce donutí omezit se na veřejné
cesty, a chození po zemi bude znamenat neoprávněné vniknutí na cizí pozemek. Ti, kdo
se snaží vytyčit hranice svých pozemků, se podle Thoreaua propadají do močálů řeky
Styx a jejich zeměměřičem není nikdo jiný než Satan.
Dejte mi divokost
Chodec musí často činit nelehké rozhodnutí, kam a kterou cestou se vydat. „Věřím, že
v Přírodě je nepatrný magnetismus, který nás, pokud se mu mimovolně podřídíme,
navede tím správným směrem,“ míní Thoreau a dodává, že stezka, kterou kráčíme, je
symbolem cesty, po níž se rádi procházíme ve svém vnitřním světě. Což je myšlenka
odvozená od Emersonovy základní transcendentalistické teze, že „určité přírodní
skutečnosti jsou symboly určitých duševních skutečností“. Jehlu Thoreauova kompasu
s mírnými odchylkami přitahoval jeden směr — západ. Na opačnou světovou stranu se
vydával jen kvůli tomu, aby studoval umění, literaturu a filozofii, ale na západě viděl
naději a budoucnost. Západ, který měl na mysli, byl totiž synonymem pro již zmíněnou
divočinu.
A zde autor přivádí čtenáře na myšlenku, že „v divokosti je záchrana světa“.
Požaduje: „Dejte mi divokost, jejíž letmý pohled nevydrží žádná civilizace.“ Tento způsob
uvažování byl důležitý pro pozdější ochranářské hnutí v USA, jehož otec zakladatel John
Muir z Thoreaua čerpal. „Jak blízké dobrému je to, co je divoké!“ parafrázuje Thoreau
alžbětinského básníka a dramatika Bena Jonsona a pokračuje prohlášením, že
budoucnost nevidí ve městech, pěstěných trávnících a kultivovaných polích, ale
v nepřístupných bažinách: „Kdyby mi někdo nabídl, abych bydlel vedle nejkrásnější
zahrady, jakou kdy vytvořila lidská zručnost, nebo vedle bezútěšné bažiny, rozhodně bych
si vybral tu bažinu.“ Na všechna lidská vylepšování nahlíží jako na deformace krajiny
snažící se o její zkrocení.
Podobně se dívá i na krocení a ochočování zvířat. Raduje se z hravosti a dovádění
dobytka a z toho, že koně a voli musí být nejprve zlomeni, než začnou sloužit člověku.
I v člověku zůstávají podle Thoreaua zbytky divokosti, díky nimž se nestává poddajným
členem společnosti tak snadno. To, že většina lidí, stejně jako mnohé zvířecí druhy,
podléhá civilizaci, neznamená, že i ostatní by se měli snížit na stejnou úroveň. Zde se
projevuje Thoreauův smysl pro paradox — za vyšší úroveň považuje člověka divokého,
nikoliv všeobecně vyzdvihovaného člověka zušlechtěného civilizací. A v zápětí volá po
zachování divokosti ostatních živočišných druhů, u nichž si dokáže představit jejich lepší
využití než stahování a vydělávání jejich kůží na výrobu bot. Tehdy byl ovšem pojem
práva zvířat, stejně jako environmentalismus, zcela neznámý.
Americká obloha vyšší evropské
Překvapivě se Thoreau v Chůzi projevuje jako patriot. Nepěl samozřejmě ódy na
politickou elitu země. Naopak se těšil z toho, jak málo místa v krajině zaujímají záležitosti
církve, státu, obchodu a politiky, která pro něj neznamená nic víc než kouř z doutníku,
tedy něco mizivého. Jeho patriotismus se vztahuje na rostliny a zvířata, s nimiž se na
svých toulkách setkává, a ohrazuje se proti povýšenému postoji přírodovědce Buffona
vůči americké přírodě. Věří, že v Americe se obloha jeví vyšší nežli v Evropě a že těchto
výšin jednou dosáhne i filozofie, náboženství a literatura jejích obyvatel.
Co se posledně jmenovaného týče, Thoreau si stěžuje, že neví o žádné poezii, která
by dostatečně vyjádřila „touhu po Divočině“ a nechala mluvit přírodu. Těžko říci, zda tyto
snahy neviděl ve Stéblech trávy svého vrstevníka Walta Whitmana, s nímž se osobně
setkal. V předmluvě ke své sbírce z roku 1855 Whitman píše: „Země a moře, zvířata,
ryby a ptáci, nebeská klenba a její útvary nejsou malými náměty ...“ Knihy o jednadvacet
let mladšího Johna Muira si Thoreau bohužel už přečíst nemohl a básníci divočiny, jako
Gary Snyder (pozn. red.: viz SG 1/2005 věnovaná divočině) a Nanao Sakaki či český
poutník karpatskou přírodou Miloslav Nevrlý, přišli na scénu o nějakých sto let později.
Thoreau touto esejí každopádně nasadil vysokou laťku zejména pro budoucí autory
hledající hlubší vztahy člověka a přírody — všichni z něj alespoň částečně vycházejí.
Výrazně a v jistém smyslu radikálně vyzdvihl dílo divoké přírody nad dílo lidských rukou
a poukázal na nesmírnou hodnotu divočiny i pro civilizovaného člověka. Toto poselství
platí o to více v dnešní době, kdy skutečné divočiny příliš nezbývá a jen málo divokého
zůstává nezkroceno.
Henry David Thoreau: Walking. Bedford, Massachusetts: Applewood Books 1992;
české vydání Chůze. Brno: Zvláštní vydání 1995.
The eminence of his public position made Emerson’s approval a valued commodity, as Whitman showed when he
printed a congratulatory letter from Emerson with the second edition of Leaves of Grass. It also made him a
formidable predecessor with whom younger writers had to contend. Writers as diverse as Thoreau, Louisa May
Alcott, and Elizabeth Stuart Phelps describe their emergence onto the literary scene in relationship to Emerson, to
his influence as a teacher or writer, a speaker or austere presence. Yet even such acknowledgments as
Whitman’s famous remark—“I was simmering, simmering, simmering, and Emerson brought me to a boil”—
position Emerson primarily as a precursor, important for his influence on others, rather than for his own work. As
Joel Porte has argued, “Emerson’s fate, somewhat like Shakespeare’s, was that he came to be treated as an
almost purely allegorical personage whose real character and work got submerged in his function as a touchstone
of critical opinion.” He becomes the founder of “Transcendentalism” or the spokesman for “Nature,” the “optimist”
who does not understand the world’s evil or pain. He is thus removed from the march of time, idealized as a
“primordial” figure whose vision isolates him from the political and social struggles of his age.
But Emerson was never simply a distant patriarchal figure sheltered from the material problems of his age. He
constructed his “optative” exuberance despite the early deaths of his father, two of his brothers, his beloved young
wife, and his first son, and despite his own serious bouts with lung disease and eye strain. He was a child both of
privilege and penury, of family position and dependence. As he wrote early on in his journal: “It is my own humor
to despise pedigree. I was educated to prize it.” His father, the minister William Emerson, died when he was eight,
and his mother, Ruth Haskins Emerson, supported the five children (three others died young) by taking in
boarders and by periodically living with relatives in Concord. Emerson’s education vacillated between Boston
Latin school and private tutoring by his aunt Mary Moody Emerson. At Harvard, which he attended on scholarship,
Emerson struggled with the academic curriculum and with his expected future as either a teacher or minister. But
he also conducted a more satisfying private education of reading and journal-writing that would prepare him to be
a writer, an American scholar, and poet. Those aims had to wait, however, while Emerson helped support his
family by teaching school. In 1825, he entered Harvard Divinity School, following nine generations of his family
into the ministry. Yet six years after his ordination, he resigned the ministry, concerned that the “dogmatic
theology” of “formal Christianity” looked only to past traditions and the words of the dead. “My business is with the
living,” he wrote in his journal. “I have sometimes thought that in order to be a good minister it was necessary to
leave the ministry.”
These years were full of personal tumult as well. In 1829, Emerson married Ellen Tucker, only to lose her sixteen
months later to the tuberculosis that also threatened him. The pain of her death and his own sense of vulnerability
may have hastened Emerson’s decision to leave the ministry. With the substantial inheritance she left him, he had
the means to make such a change, to travel on the continent, to buy books, and to write them. The inheritance,
with the earnings he received from his lecture tours and his publications and with a lifetime of frugality and fiscal
planning, made him financially secure. He supported an extended family, caring for his retarded brother for twenty
years. In 1835, he married Lidian Jackson, and moved to Concord, where they had four children—Waldo, Ellen,
Edith, and Edward Waldo, who later edited his father’s works and journals. The death from scarlet fever of five-
year-old Waldo was a blow to Emerson’s faith in compensation. In his 1844 essay “Experience,” he wrote from
this loss, and from his urgent desire to regain the “practical power” that could persist despite personal and public
griefs. “Life is not intellectual or critical, but sturdy,” he argued. His subsequent career and personal life reflect a
determined affirmation to be “an active soul.” “I am Defeated all the time,” he acknowledged, “yet to Victory I am
born.” Emerson continued his work into his seventies, relying on his daughter Ellen to help organize his last
lectures and essays. He died in 1882, from pneumonia, and was buried in Concord, near Thoreau and
Hawthorne.
Emerson’s long career, and his financial and social security, allowed him to intervene decisively in the formation of
American culture and letters. Although he generally resisted the call to public advocacy, he was sought after to
support various social causes: he was urged to join the experimental commune of Brook Farm, prodded to take a
leading role in the abolitionist movement and in the lobbying for women’s rights. Emerson’s efforts on behalf of his
fellow writers were of material importance, addressing the social impediments to publication and reputation.
Through financial support, personal connections, or editorial efforts, he made possible publication of work by
Thoreau and Bronson Alcott, Margaret Fuller and Jones Very. He loaned Thoreau the property at Walden Pond for
his celebrated retreat and raised money to support the impoverished Alcott family, despite his own belief that a
philosopher should earn his keep. He oversaw American printings of Carlyle’s books and wrote prefaces for
translations of Persian poets and of Plutarch. With Margaret Fuller, he edited The Dial, a short-lived but influential
periodical.
Emerson’s initial fame came from his critique of the literary, religious, and educational establishments of his day.
He was known as an experimenter who urged Americans to reject their deference to old modes and values, to
continental traditions. His chiding lectures about Harvard’s religious and literary training, and his resignation from
the clergy, made him a spokesman for reformist positions, although it also aroused harsh criticism of him as a
religious infidel, “a sort of mad dog,” and a “dangerous man.” At the first meeting of the Transcendental Club,
Emerson decried the “tame” genius of the times that did not match the grandeur of “this Titanic continent,” and he
transformed Harvard’s traditional Phi Beta Kappa oration on “The American Scholar” into a critique of the “meek
young men” and “sluggard intellect of this continent” and a call for a new age when “we will walk on our own feet;
we will work with our own hands; we will speak our own minds.”
Emerson’s work is characterized by a combination of homely metaphors and grandiose goals, by his insistence
on the present and his expectations for the future. His outpouring of “private” writings reflects a practical economy
of writing, in which journals serve as a “Savings Bank” for “deposit” of “earnings” to be reworked into lectures and
essays. They demonstrate his incredible energy and discipline (he kept 182 journals and notebooks over his
career, which he carefully reread, indexed, and cross-referenced for use in preparing his more “public” work); and
they reflect an astounding ambition, evident in the titles of his college journals, “The Wide World” and “The
Universe,” and in such notebooks as “XO” (“Inexorable; Reality and Illusion”).
Emerson’s literary practices have always been provocative. A critic of his first book, Nature, was offended by
language that is sometimes “coarse and blunt.” He also protested that “the effort of perusal is often painful, the
thoughts excited are frequently bewildering, and the results to which they lead us, uncertain and obscure. The
reader feels as in a disturbed dream.” Although modern readers are unlikely to be upset by Emerson’s diction or
references to sex and madness, he remains disturbing, seen as a “difficult” writer requiring vast annotation and
philosophic glossing. Emerson was indeed an allusive writer, but his use of cultural materials provokes with a
purpose. The context he constructs is adamantly untraditional, mixing quotations from classics and British poetry
with Asian literature and Welsh bards. One metaphor will emerge from his interest in scientific or engineering
experiments, another from local politics, and yet another from what his son Waldo said that morning. The problem
in reading Emerson—as well as the pleasure—is in seeing how such eclecticism undermines conventions of
authority and reference and challenges established modes of reading.
For himself, and for the American public, he advocated “creative reading as well as creative writing,” rejecting
traditional oppositions between thinking and acting, between the scholar and the worker, between the speculative
and the practical. “Words are also actions,” he wrote, “and actions are a kind of words.” For despite the hopeful
tone of much of the writing, Emerson’s brand of self-reliance and his exuberant nationalism were an aspiration, to
be achieved only through constant work, constant critique. Emerson’s aim as a writer was less to originate a
tradition than to produce active readers, who would then refashion themselves and their culture: “Let me remind
the reader that I am only an experimenter. Do not set the least value on what I do, or the least discredit on what I
do not, as if I pretended to settle anything as true or false. I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none
are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker, with no Past at my back.”
Jean Ferguson Carr
University of Pittsburgh
IX. Emerson.
§ 12. Ideas.
15
And as his verse, so is his prose. Though in one sense, so far as he writes always with two
or three dominant ideas in his mind, he is one of the most consistent and persistent of
expositors, yet he is really himself only in those moments of inspiration when his words
strike with almost irresistible force on the heart, and awake an echoing response: “This is
true; this I have myself dimly felt.” Sometimes the memorable paragraph or sentence is
purely didactic; sometimes it is highly metaphorical, as is the case with the closing
paragraph of the Conduct of Life:
There is no chance, and no anarchy, in the universe. All is system and gradation. Every god
is there sitting in his sphere. The young mortal enters the hall of the firmament; there is he
alone with them alone, they pouring on him benedictions and gifts, and beckoning him up
to their thrones. On the instant, and incessantly, fall snowstorms of illusions. He fancies
himself in a vast crowd which sways this way and that, and whose movement and doings
he must obey: he fancies himself poor, orphaned, insignificant. The mad crowd drives
hither and thither, now furiously commanding this thing to be done, now that. What is he
that he should resist their will, and think or act for himself? Every moment, new changes,
and new showers of deceptions, to baffle and distract him. And when, by and by, for an
instant, the air clears, and the cloud lifts a little, there are the gods still sitting around him
on their thrones,–they alone with him alone.
16
There is, it need scarcely be said, a good deal in the works of Emerson—literary criticism,
characterization of men and movements, reflection on the state of society—which lies
outside of this ethical category; but even in such essays his guiding ideas are felt in the
background. Nor are these ideas hard to discover. The whole circle of them, ever revolving
upon itself, is likely to be present, explicit or implicit, in any one of his great passages, as it
is in the paragraph just cited—the clear call to self-reliance, announcing that “a man should
learn to detect and watch that gleam of light which flashes across his mind from within”;
the firm assurance that, through all the balanced play of circumstance, “there is a deeper
fact in the soul than compensation, to wit, its own nature”; the intuition, despite all the
mists of illusion, of the Over-Soul which is above us and still ourselves: “We live in
succession, in division, in parts, in particles; meanwhile within man is the soul of the
whole; the wise silence; the universal beauty … the eternal One.”
17
Emerson’s philosophy is thus a kind of reconciled dualism, and a man’s attitude towards it
in the end will be determined by his sense of its sufficiency or insufficiency to meet the
facts of experience. One of Emerson’s biographers has attempted to set forth this
philosophy as “a synthesis and an anticipation.” It is a synthesis because in it we fund, as
Emerson had already found in Plato and Plotinus, a reconciliation of “the many and the
one,” the everlasting flux and the motionless calm at the heart of things:
An ample and generous recognition of this transiency and slipperiness both in the nature of
things and in man’s soul seems more and more a necessary ingredient in any estimate of
the universe which shall satisfy the intellect of the coming man. But it seems equally true
that the coming man who shall resolve our will never content himself with a universe a-tilt,
a universe in cascade, so to speak; the craving for permanence in some form cannot be
jauntily evaded. Is there any known mind which foreshadows the desired combination so
clearly as Emerson’s? Who has felt profoundly the evanescence and evasiveness of things?
… Yet Emerson was quite as firm in his insistence on a single unalterable reality as in his
refusal to believe that any aspect or estimate of that reality could be final. 4
The Over-Soul
from Essays: First Series (1841)
Ralph Waldo Emerson
"But souls that of his own good life partake,
He loves as his own self; dear as his eye
They are to Him: He'll never them forsake:
When they shall die, then God himself shall die:
They live, they live in blest eternity."
Henry More
Space is ample, east and west,
But two cannot go abreast,
Cannot travel in it two:
Yonder masterful cuckoo
Crowds every egg out of the nest,
Quick or dead, except its own;
A spell is laid on sod and stone,
Night and Day 've been tampered with,
Every quality and pith
Surcharged and sultry with a power
That works its will on age and hour.
ESSAY IX The Over-Soul
There is a difference between one and another hour of life, in their authority and subsequent effect.
Our faith comes in moments; our vice is habitual. Yet there is a depth in those brief moments which
constrains us to ascribe more reality to them than to all other experiences. For this reason, the
argument which is always forthcoming to silence those who conceive extraordinary hopes of man,
namely, the appeal to experience, is for ever invalid and vain. We give up the past to the objector, and
yet we hope. He must explain this hope. We grant that human life is mean; but how did we find out
that it was mean? What is the ground of this uneasiness of ours; of this old discontent? What is the
universal sense of want and ignorance, but the fine inuendo by which the soul makes its enormous
claim? Why do men feel that the natural history of man has never been written, but he is always
leaving behind what you have said of him, and it becomes old, and books of metaphysics worthless?
The philosophy of six thousand years has not searched the chambers and magazines of the soul. In its
experiments there has always remained, in the last analysis, a residuum it could not resolve. Man is a
stream whose source is hidden. Our being is descending into us from we know not whence. The most
exact calculator has no prescience that somewhat incalculable may not balk the very next moment. I
am constrained every moment to acknowledge a higher origin for events than the will I call mine.
As with events, so is it with thoughts. When I watch that flowing river, which, out of regions I see
not, pours for a season its streams into me, I see that I am a pensioner; not a cause, but a surprised
spectator of this ethereal water; that I desire and look up, and put myself in the attitude of reception,
but from some alien energy the visions come.
The Supreme Critic on the errors of the past and the present, and the only prophet of that which
must be, is that great nature in which we rest, as the earth lies in the soft arms of the atmosphere; that
Unity, that Over-soul, within which every man's particular being is contained and made one with all
other; that common heart, of which all sincere conversation is the worship, to which all right action is
submission; that overpowering reality which confutes our tricks and talents, and constrains every one
to pass for what he is, and to speak from his character, and not from his tongue, and which evermore
tends to pass into our thought and hand, and become wisdom, and virtue, and power, and beauty. We
live in succession, in division, in parts, in particles. Meantime within man is the soul of the whole; the
wise silence; the universal beauty, to which every part and particle is equally related; the eternal ONE.
And this deep power in which we exist, and whose beatitude is all accessible to us, is not only self-
sufficing and perfect in every hour, but the act of seeing and the thing seen, the seer and the spectacle,
the subject and the object, are one. We see the world piece by piece, as the sun, the moon, the animal,
the tree; but the whole, of which these are the shining parts, is the soul. Only by the vision of that
Wisdom can the horoscope of the ages be read, and by falling back on our better thoughts, by yielding
to the spirit of prophecy which is innate in every man, we can know what it saith. Every man's words,
who speaks from that life, must sound vain to those who do not dwell in the same thought on their own
part. I dare not speak for it. My words do not carry its august sense; they fall short and cold. Only itself
can inspire whom it will, and behold! their speech shall be lyrical, and sweet, and universal as the
rising of the wind. Yet I desire, even by profane words, if I may not use sacred, to indicate the heaven
of this deity, and to report what hints I have collected of the transcendent simplicity and energy of the
Highest Law.
If we consider what happens in conversation, in reveries, in remorse, in times of passion, in
surprises, in the instructions of dreams, wherein often we see ourselves in masquerade, — the droll
disguises only magnifying and enhancing a real element, and forcing it on our distinct notice, — we
shall catch many hints that will broaden and lighten into knowledge of the secret of nature. All goes to
show that the soul in man is not an organ, but animates and exercises all the organs; is not a function,
like the power of memory, of calculation, of comparison, but uses these as hands and feet; is not a
faculty, but a light; is not the intellect or the will, but the master of the intellect and the will; is the
background of our being, in which they lie, — an immensity not possessed and that cannot be
possessed. From within or from behind, a light shines through us upon things, and makes us aware
that we are nothing, but the light is all. A man is the fasade of a temple wherein all wisdom and all
good abide. What we commonly call man, the eating, drinking, planting, counting man, does not, as we
know him, represent himself, but misrepresents himself. Him we do not respect, but the soul, whose
organ he is, would he let it appear through his action, would make our knees bend. When it breathes
through his intellect, it is genius; when it breathes through his will, it is virtue; when it flows through
his affection, it is love. And the blindness of the intellect begins, when it would be something of itself.
The weakness of the will begins, when the individual would be something of himself. All reform aims,
in some one particular, to let the soul have its way through us; in other words, to engage us to obey.
Of this pure nature every man is at some time sensible. Language cannot paint it with his colors. It
is too subtile. It is undefinable, unmeasurable, but we know that it pervades and contains us. We know
that all spiritual being is in man. A wise old proverb says, "God comes to see us without bell"; that is, as
there is no screen or ceiling between our heads and the infinite heavens, so is there no bar or wall in
the soul where man, the effect, ceases, and God, the cause, begins. The walls are taken away. We lie
open on one side to the deeps of spiritual nature, to the attributes of God. Justice we see and know,
Love, Freedom, Power. These natures no man ever got above, but they tower over us, and most in the
moment when our interests tempt us to wound them.
The sovereignty of this nature whereof we speak is made known by its independency of those
limitations which circumscribe us on every hand. The soul circumscribes all things. As I have said, it
contradicts all experience. In like manner it abolishes time and space. The influence of the senses has,
in most men, overpowered the mind to that degree, that the walls of time and space have come to look
real and insurmountable; and to speak with levity of these limits is, in the world, the sign of insanity.
Yet time and space are but inverse measures of the force of the soul. The spirit sports with time, —
"Can crowd eternity into an hour,
Or stretch an hour to eternity."
We are often made to feel that there is another youth and age than that which is measured from the
year of our natural birth. Some thoughts always find us young, and keep us so. Such a thought is the
love of the universal and eternal beauty. Every man parts from that contemplation with the feeling that
it rather belongs to ages than to mortal life. The least activity of the intellectual powers redeems us in a
degree from the conditions of time. In sickness, in languor, give us a strain of poetry, or a profound
sentence, and we are refreshed; or produce a volume of Plato, or Shakspeare, or remind us of their
names, and instantly we come into a feeling of longevity. See how the deep, divine thought reduces
centuries, and millenniums, and makes itself present through all ages. Is the teaching of Christ less
effective now than it was when first his mouth was opened? The emphasis of facts and persons in my
thought has nothing to do with time. And so, always, the soul's scale is one; the scale of the senses and
the understanding is another. Before the revelations of the soul, Time, Space, and Nature shrink away.
In common speech, we refer all things to time, as we habitually refer the immensely sundered stars to
one concave sphere. And so we say that the Judgment is distant or near, that the Millennium
approaches, that a day of certain political, moral, social reforms is at hand, and the like, when we
mean, that, in the nature of things, one of the facts we contemplate is external and fugitive, and the
other is permanent and connate with the soul. The things we now esteem fixed shall, one by one,
detach themselves, like ripe fruit, from our experience, and fall. The wind shall blow them none knows
whither. The landscape, the figures, Boston, London, are facts as fugitive as any institution past, or any
whiff of mist or smoke, and so is society, and so is the world. The soul looketh steadily forwards,
creating a world before her, leaving worlds behind her. She has no dates, nor rites, nor persons, nor
specialties, nor men. The soul knows only the soul; the web of events is the flowing robe in which she is
clothed.
After its own law and not by arithmetic is the rate of its progress to be computed. The soul's
advances are not made by gradation, such as can be represented by motion in a straight line; but rather
by ascension of state, such as can be represented by metamorphosis, — from the egg to the worm, from
the worm to the fly. The growths of genius are of a certain total character, that does not advance the
elect individual first over John, then Adam, then Richard, and give to each the pain of discovered
inferiority, but by every throe of growth the man expands there where he works, passing, at each
pulsation, classes, populations, of men. With each divine impulse the mind rends the thin rinds of the
visible and finite, and comes out into eternity, and inspires and expires its air. It converses with truths
that have always been spoken in the world, and becomes conscious of a closer sympathy with Zeno and
Arrian, than with persons in the house.
This is the law of moral and of mental gain. The simple rise as by specific levity, not into a
particular virtue, but into the region of all the virtues. They are in the spirit which contains them all.
The soul requires purity, but purity is not it; requires justice, but justice is not that; requires
beneficence, but is somewhat better; so that there is a kind of descent and accommodation felt when
we leave speaking of moral nature, to urge a virtue which it enjoins. To the well-born child, all the
virtues are natural, and not painfully acquired. Speak to his heart, and the man becomes suddenly
virtuous.
Within the same sentiment is the germ of intellectual growth, which obeys the same law. Those
who are capable of humility, of justice, of love, of aspiration, stand already on a platform that
commands the sciences and arts, speech and poetry, action and grace. For whoso dwells in this moral
beatitude already anticipates those special powers which men prize so highly. The lover has no talent,
no skill, which passes for quite nothing with his enamoured maiden, however little she may possess of
related faculty; and the heart which abandons itself to the Supreme Mind finds itself related to all its
works, and will travel a royal road to particular knowledges and powers. In ascending to this primary
and aboriginal sentiment, we have come from our remote station on the circumference
instantaneously to the centre of the world, where, as in the closet of God, we see causes, and anticipate
the universe, which is but a slow effect.
One mode of the divine teaching is the incarnation of the spirit in a form, — in forms, like my own.
I live in society; with persons who answer to thoughts in my own mind, or express a certain obedience
to the great instincts to which I live. I see its presence to them. I am certified of a common nature; and
these other souls, these separated selves, draw me as nothing else can. They stir in me the new
emotions we call passion; of love, hatred, fear, admiration, pity; thence comes conversation,
competition, persuasion, cities, and war. Persons are supplementary to the primary teaching of the
soul. In youth we are mad for persons. Childhood and youth see all the world in them. But the larger
experience of man discovers the identical nature appearing through them all. Persons themselves
acquaint us with the impersonal. In all conversation between two persons, tacit reference is made, as
to a third party, to a common nature. That third party or common nature is not social; it is impersonal;
is God. And so in groups where debate is earnest, and especially on high questions, the company
become aware that the thought rises to an equal level in all bosoms, that all have a spiritual property in
what was said, as well as the sayer. They all become wiser than they were. It arches over them like a
temple, this unity of thought, in which every heart beats with nobler sense of power and duty, and
thinks and acts with unusual solemnity. All are conscious of attaining to a higher self-possession. It
shines for all. There is a certain wisdom of humanity which is common to the greatest men with the
lowest, and which our ordinary education often labors to silence and obstruct. The mind is one, and
the best minds, who love truth for its own sake, think much less of property in truth. They accept it
thankfully everywhere, and do not label or stamp it with any man's name, for it is theirs long
beforehand, and from eternity. The learned and the studious of thought have no monopoly of wisdom.
Their violence of direction in some degree disqualifies them to think truly. We owe many valuable
observations to people who are not very acute or profound, and who say the thing without effort, which
we want and have long been hunting in vain. The action of the soul is oftener in that which is felt and
left unsaid, than in that which is said in any conversation. It broods over every society, and they
unconsciously seek for it in each other. We know better than we do. We do not yet possess ourselves,
and we know at the same time that we are much more. I feel the same truth how often in my trivial
conversation with my neighbours, that somewhat higher in each of us overlooks this by-play, and Jove
nods to Jove from behind each of us.
Men descend to meet. In their habitual and mean service to the world, for which they forsake their
native nobleness, they resemble those Arabian sheiks, who dwell in mean houses, and affect an
external poverty, to escape the rapacity of the Pacha, and reserve all their display of wealth for their
interior and guarded retirements.
As it is present in all persons, so it is in every period of life. It is adult already in the infant man. In
my dealing with my child, my Latin and Greek, my accomplishments and my money stead me nothing;
but as much soul as I have avails. If I am wilful, he sets his will against mine, one for one, and leaves
me, if I please, the degradation of beating him by my superiority of strength. But if I renounce my will,
and act for the soul, setting that up as umpire between us two, out of his young eyes looks the same
soul; he reveres and loves with me.
The soul is the perceiver and revealer of truth. We know truth when we see it, let skeptic and
scoffer say what they choose. Foolish people ask you, when you have spoken what they do not wish to
hear, 'How do you know it is truth, and not an error of your own?' We know truth when we see it, from
opinion, as we know when we are awake that we are awake. It was a grand sentence of Emanuel
Swedenborg, which would alone indicate the greatness of that man's perception, — "It is no proof of a
man's understanding to be able to confirm whatever he pleases; but to be able to discern that what is
true is true, and that what is false is false, this is the mark and character of intelligence." In the book I
read, the good thought returns to me, as every truth will, the image of the whole soul. To the bad
thought which I find in it, the same soul becomes a discerning, separating sword, and lops it away. We
are wiser than we know. If we will not interfere with our thought, but will act entirely, or see how the
thing stands in God, we know the particular thing, and every thing, and every man. For the Maker of
all things and all persons stands behind us, and casts his dread omniscience through us over things.
But beyond this recognition of its own in particular passages of the individual's experience, it also
reveals truth. And here we should seek to reinforce ourselves by its very presence, and to speak with a
worthier, loftier strain of that advent. For the soul's communication of truth is the highest event in
nature, since it then does not give somewhat from itself, but it gives itself, or passes into and becomes
that man whom it enlightens; or, in proportion to that truth he receives, it takes him to itself.
We distinguish the announcements of the soul, its manifestations of its own nature, by the term
Revelation. These are always attended by the emotion of the sublime. For this communication is an
influx of the Divine mind into our mind. It is an ebb of the individual rivulet before the flowing surges
of the sea of life. Every distinct apprehension of this central commandment agitates men with awe and
delight. A thrill passes through all men at the reception of new truth, or at the performance of a great
action, which comes out of the heart of nature. In these communications, the power to see is not
separated from the will to do, but the insight proceeds from obedience, and the obedience proceeds
from a joyful perception. Every moment when the individual feels himself invaded by it is memorable.
By the necessity of our constitution, a certain enthusiasm attends the individual's consciousness of that
divine presence. The character and duration of this enthusiasm varies with the state of the individual,
from an ecstasy and trance and prophetic inspiration, — which is its rarer appearance, — to the faintest
glow of virtuous emotion, in which form it warms, like our household fires, all the families and
associations of men, and makes society possible. A certain tendency to insanity has always attended
the opening of the religious sense in men, as if they had been "blasted with excess of light." The trances
of Socrates, the "union" of Plotinus, the vision of Porphyry, the conversion of Paul, the aurora of
Behmen, the convulsions of George Fox and his Quakers, the illumination of Swedenborg, are of this
kind. What was in the case of these remarkable persons a ravishment has, in innumerable instances in
common life, been exhibited in less striking manner. Everywhere the history of religion betrays a
tendency to enthusiasm. The rapture of the Moravian and Quietist; the opening of the internal sense of
the Word, in the language of the New Jerusalem Church; the revival of the Calvinistic churches; the
experiences of the Methodists, are varying forms of that shudder of awe and delight with which the
individual soul always mingles with the universal soul.
The nature of these revelations is the same; they are perceptions of the absolute law. They are
solutions of the soul's own questions. They do not answer the questions which the understanding asks.
The soul answers never by words, but by the thing itself that is inquired after.
Revelation is the disclosure of the soul. The popular notion of a revelation is, that it is a telling of
fortunes. In past oracles of the soul, the understanding seeks to find answers to sensual questions, and
undertakes to tell from God how long men shall exist, what their hands shall do, and who shall be their
company, adding names, and dates, and places. But we must pick no locks. We must check this low
curiosity. An answer in words is delusive; it is really no answer to the questions you ask. Do not require
a description of the countries towards which you sail. The description does not describe them to you,
and to-morrow you arrive there, and know them by inhabiting them. Men ask concerning the
immortality of the soul, the employments of heaven, the state of the sinner, and so forth. They even
dream that Jesus has left replies to precisely these interrogatories. Never a moment did that sublime
spirit speak in their patois. To truth, justice, love, the attributes of the soul, the idea of immutableness
is essentially associated. Jesus, living in these moral sentiments, heedless of sensual fortunes, heeding
only the manifestations of these, never made the separation of the idea of duration from the essence of
these attributes, nor uttered a syllable concerning the duration of the soul. It was left to his disciples to
sever duration from the moral elements, and to teach the immortality of the soul as a doctrine, and
maintain it by evidences. The moment the doctrine of the immortality is separately taught, man is
already fallen. In the flowing of love, in the adoration of humility, there is no question of continuance.
No inspired man ever asks this question, or condescends to these evidences. For the soul is true to
itself, and the man in whom it is shed abroad cannot wander from the present, which is infinite, to a
future which would be finite.
These questions which we lust to ask about the future are a confession of sin. God has no answer
for them. No answer in words can reply to a question of things. It is not in an arbitrary "decree of God,"
but in the nature of man, that a veil shuts down on the facts of to-morrow; for the soul will not have us
read any other cipher than that of cause and effect. By this veil, which curtains events, it instructs the
children of men to live in to-day. The only mode of obtaining an answer to these questions of the
senses is to forego all low curiosity, and, accepting the tide of being which floats us into the secret of
nature, work and live, work and live, and all unawares the advancing soul has built and forged for itself
a new condition, and the question and the answer are one.
By the same fire, vital, consecrating, celestial, which burns until it shall dissolve all things into the
waves and surges of an ocean of light, we see and know each other, and what spirit each is of. Who can
tell the grounds of his knowledge of the character of the several individuals in his circle of friends? No
man. Yet their acts and words do not disappoint him. In that man, though he knew no ill of him, he put
no trust. In that other, though they had seldom met, authentic signs had yet passed, to signify that he
might be trusted as one who had an interest in his own character. We know each other very well, —
which of us has been just to himself, and whether that which we teach or behold is only an aspiration,
or is our honest effort also.
We are all discerners of spirits. That diagnosis lies aloft in our life or unconscious power. The
intercourse of society, — its trade, its religion, its friendships, its quarrels,— is one wide, judicial
investigation of character. In full court, or in small committee, or confronted face to face, accuser and
accused, men offer themselves to be judged. Against their will they exhibit those decisive trifles by
which character is read. But who judges? and what? Not our understanding. We do not read them by
learning or craft. No; the wisdom of the wise man consists herein, that he does not judge them; he lets
them judge themselves, and merely reads and records their own verdict.
By virtue of this inevitable nature, private will is overpowered, and, maugre our efforts or our
imperfections, your genius will speak from you, and mine from me. That which we are, we shall teach,
not voluntarily, but involuntarily. Thoughts come into our minds by avenues which we never left open,
and thoughts go out of our minds through avenues which we never voluntarily opened. Character
teaches over our head. The infallible index of true progress is found in the tone the man takes. Neither
his age, nor his breeding, nor company, nor books, nor actions, nor talents, nor all together, can hinder
him from being deferential to a higher spirit than his own. If he have not found his home in God, his
manners, his forms of speech, the turn of his sentences, the build, shall I say, of all his opinions, will
involuntarily confess it, let him brave it out how he will. If he have found his centre, the Deity will
shine through him, through all the disguises of ignorance, of ungenial temperament, of unfavorable
circumstance. The tone of seeking is one, and the tone of having is another.
The great distinction between teachers sacred or literary, — between poets like Herbert, and poets
like Pope, — between philosophers like Spinoza, Kant, and Coleridge, and philosophers like Locke,
Paley, Mackintosh, and Stewart, — between men of the world, who are reckoned accomplished talkers,
and here and there a fervent mystic, prophesying, half insane under the infinitude of his thought, — is,
that one class speak from within, or from experience, as parties and possessors of the fact; and the
other class, from without, as spectators merely, or perhaps as acquainted with the fact on the evidence
of third persons. It is of no use to preach to me from without. I can do that too easily myself. Jesus
speaks always from within, and in a degree that transcends all others. In that is the miracle. I believe
beforehand that it ought so to be. All men stand continually in the expectation of the appearance of
such a teacher. But if a man do not speak from within the veil, where the word is one with that it tells
of, let him lowly confess it.
The same Omniscience flows into the intellect, and makes what we call genius. Much of the wisdom
of the world is not wisdom, and the most illuminated class of men are no doubt superior to literary
fame, and are not writers. Among the multitude of scholars and authors, we feel no hallowing
presence; we are sensible of a knack and skill rather than of inspiration; they have a light, and know
not whence it comes, and call it their own; their talent is some exaggerated faculty, some overgrown
member, so that their strength is a disease. In these instances the intellectual gifts do not make the
impression of virtue, but almost of vice; and we feel that a man's talents stand in the way of his
advancement in truth. But genius is religious. It is a larger imbibing of the common heart. It is not
anomalous, but more like, and not less like other men. There is, in all great poets, a wisdom of
humanity which is superior to any talents they exercise. The author, the wit, the partisan, the fine
gentleman, does not take place of the man. Humanity shines in Homer, in Chaucer, in Spenser, in
Shakspeare, in Milton. They are content with truth. They use the positive degree. They seem frigid and
phlegmatic to those who have been spiced with the frantic passion and violent coloring of inferior, but
popular writers. For they are poets by the free course which they allow to the informing soul, which
through their eyes beholds again, and blesses the things which it hath made. The soul is superior to its
knowledge; wiser than any of its works. The great poet makes us feel our own wealth, and then we
think less of his compositions. His best communication to our mind is to teach us to despise all he has
done. Shakspeare carries us to such a lofty strain of intelligent activity, as to suggest a wealth which
beggars his own; and we then feel that the splendid works which he has created, and which in other
hours we extol as a sort of self-existent poetry, take no stronger hold of real nature than the shadow of
a passing traveller on the rock. The inspiration which uttered itself in Hamlet and Lear could utter
things as good from day to day, for ever. Why, then, should I make account of Hamlet and Lear, as if
we had not the soul from which they fell as syllables from the tongue?
This energy does not descend into individual life on any other condition than entire possession. It
comes to the lowly and simple; it comes to whomsoever will put off what is foreign and proud; it comes
as insight; it comes as serenity and grandeur. When we see those whom it inhabits, we are apprized of
new degrees of greatness. From that inspiration the man comes back with a changed tone. He does not
talk with men with an eye to their opinion. He tries them. It requires of us to be plain and true. The
vain traveller attempts to embellish his life by quoting my lord, and the prince, and the countess, who
thus said or did to him. The ambitious vulgar show you their spoons, and brooches, and rings, and
preserve their cards and compliments. The more cultivated, in their account of their own experience,
cull out the pleasing, poetic circumstance, — the visit to Rome, the man of genius they saw, the
brilliant friend they know; still further on, perhaps, the gorgeous landscape, the mountain lights, the
mountain thoughts, they enjoyed yesterday, — and so seek to throw a romantic color over their life.
But the soul that ascends to worship the great God is plain and true; has no rose-color, no fine friends,
no chivalry, no adventures; does not want admiration; dwells in the hour that now is, in the earnest
experience of the common day, — by reason of the present moment and the mere trifle having become
porous to thought, and bibulous of the sea of light.
Converse with a mind that is grandly simple, and literature looks like word-catching. The simplest
utterances are worthiest to be written, yet are they so cheap, and so things of course, that, in the
infinite riches of the soul, it is like gathering a few pebbles off the ground, or bottling a little air in a
phial, when the whole earth and the whole atmosphere are ours. Nothing can pass there, or make you
one of the circle, but the casting aside your trappings, and dealing man to man in naked truth, plain
confession, and omniscient affirmation.
Souls such as these treat you as gods would; walk as gods in the earth, accepting without any
admiration your wit, your bounty, your virtue even, — say rather your act of duty, for your virtue they
own as their proper blood, royal as themselves, and over-royal, and the father of the gods. But what
rebuke their plain fraternal bearing casts on the mutual flattery with which authors solace each other
and wound themselves! These flatter not. I do not wonder that these men go to see Cromwell, and
Christina, and Charles the Second, and James the First, and the Grand Turk. For they are, in their own
elevation, the fellows of kings, and must feel the servile tone of conversation in the world. They must
always be a godsend to princes, for they confront them, a king to a king, without ducking or
concession, and give a high nature the refreshment and satisfaction of resistance, of plain humanity, of
even companionship, and of new ideas. They leave them wiser and superior men. Souls like these make
us feel that sincerity is more excellent than flattery. Deal so plainly with man and woman, as to
constrain the utmost sincerity, and destroy all hope of trifling with you. It is the highest compliment
you can pay. Their "highest praising," said Milton, "is not flattery, and their plainest advice is a kind of
praising."
Ineffable is the union of man and God in every act of the soul. The simplest person, who in his
integrity worships God, becomes God; yet for ever and ever the influx of this better and universal self is
new and unsearchable. It inspires awe and astonishment. How dear, how soothing to man, arises the
idea of God, peopling the lonely place, effacing the scars of our mistakes and disappointments! When
we have broken our god of tradition, and ceased from our god of rhetoric, then may God fire the heart
with his presence. It is the doubling of the heart itself, nay, the infinite enlargement of the heart with a
power of growth to a new infinity on every side. It inspires in man an infallible trust. He has not the
conviction, but the sight, that the best is the true, and may in that thought easily dismiss all particular
uncertainties and fears, and adjourn to the sure revelation of time, the solution of his private riddles.
He is sure that his welfare is dear to the heart of being. In the presence of law to his mind, he is
overflowed with a reliance so universal, that it sweeps away all cherished hopes and the most stable
projects of mortal condition in its flood. He believes that he cannot escape from his good. The things
that are really for thee gravitate to thee. You are running to seek your friend. Let your feet run, but
your mind need not. If you do not find him, will you not acquiesce that it is best you should not find
him? for there is a power, which, as it is in you, is in him also, and could therefore very well bring you
together, if it were for the best. You are preparing with eagerness to go and render a service to which
your talent and your taste invite you, the love of men and the hope of fame. Has it not occurred to you,
that you have no right to go, unless you are equally willing to be prevented from going? O, believe, as
thou livest, that every sound that is spoken over the round world, which thou oughtest to hear, will
vibrate on thine ear! Every proverb, every book, every byword that belongs to thee for aid or comfort,
shall surely come home through open or winding passages. Every friend whom not thy fantastic will,
but the great and tender heart in thee craveth, shall lock thee in his embrace. And this, because the
heart in thee is the heart of all; not a valve, not a wall, not an intersection is there anywhere in nature,
but one blood rolls uninterruptedly an endless circulation through all men, as the water of the globe is
all one sea, and, truly seen, its tide is one.
Let man, then, learn the revelation of all nature and all thought to his heart; this, namely; that the
Highest dwells with him; that the sources of nature are in his own mind, if the sentiment of duty is
there. But if he would know what the great God speaketh, he must 'go into his closet and shut the
door,' as Jesus said. God will not make himself manifest to cowards. He must greatly listen to himself,
withdrawing himself from all the accents of other men's devotion. Even their prayers are hurtful to
him, until he have made his own. Our religion vulgarly stands on numbers of believers. Whenever the
appeal is made — no matter how indirectly — to numbers, proclamation is then and there made, that
religion is not. He that finds God a sweet, enveloping thought to him never counts his company. When
I sit in that presence, who shall dare to come in? When I rest in perfect humility, when I burn with
pure love, what can Calvin or Swedenborg say?
It makes no difference whether the appeal is to numbers or to one. The faith that stands on
authority is not faith. The reliance on authority measures the decline of religion, the withdrawal of the
soul. The position men have given to Jesus, now for many centuries of history, is a position of
authority. It characterizes themselves. It cannot alter the eternal facts. Great is the soul, and plain. It is
no flatterer, it is no follower; it never appeals from itself. It believes in itself. Before the immense
possibilities of man, all mere experience, all past biography, however spotless and sainted, shrinks
away. Before that heaven which our presentiments foreshow us, we cannot easily praise any form of
life we have seen or read of. We not only affirm that we have few great men, but, absolutely speaking,
that we have none; that we have no history, no record of any character or mode of living, that entirely
contents us. The saints and demigods whom history worships we are constrained to accept with a grain
of allowance. Though in our lonely hours we draw a new strength out of their memory, yet, pressed on
our attention, as they are by the thoughtless and customary, they fatigue and invade. The soul gives
itself, alone, original, and pure, to the Lonely, Original, and Pure, who, on that condition, gladly
inhabits, leads, and speaks through it. Then is it glad, young, and nimble. It is not wise, but it sees
through all things. It is not called religious, but it is innocent. It calls the light its own, and feels that
the grass grows and the stone falls by a law inferior to, and dependent on, its nature. Behold, it saith, I
am born into the great, the universal mind. I, the imperfect, adore my own Perfect. I am somehow
receptive of the great soul, and thereby I do overlook the sun and the stars, and feel them to be the fair
accidents and effects which change and pass. More and more the surges of everlasting nature enter
into me, and I become public and human in my regards and actions. So come I to live in thoughts, and
act with energies, which are immortal. Thus revering the soul, and learning, as the ancient said, that
"its beauty is immense," man will come to see that the world is the perennial miracle which the soul
worketh, and be less astonished at particular wonders; he will learn that there is no profane history;
that all history is sacred; that the universe is represented in an atom, in a moment of time. He will
weave no longer a spotted life of shreds and patches, but he will live with a divine unity. He will cease
from what is base and frivolous in his life, and be content with all places and with any service he can
render. He will calmly front the morrow in the negligency of that trust which carries God with it, and
so hath already the whole future in the bottom of the heart.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0679783229?
tag=jjsbooksbuilding&camp=15309&creative=331469&linkCode=st1&creativeASIN=06797
83229&adid=01PP2VERKM3CVCC5PN7Y&
NATURE
Introduction
from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Our age is retrospective. It builds the sepulchres of the fathers. It writes biographies, histories, and
criticism. The foregoing generations beheld God and nature face to face; we, through their eyes. Why
should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe? Why should not we have a poetry and
philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us, and not the history of
theirs? Embosomed for a season in nature, whose floods of life stream around and through us, and
invite us by the powers they supply, to action proportioned to nature, why should we grope among the
dry bones of the past, or put the living generation into masquerade out of its faded wardrobe? The sun
shines to-day also. There is more wool and flax in the fields. There are new lands, new men, new
thoughts. Let us demand our own works and laws and worship.
Undoubtedly we have no questions to ask which are unanswerable. We must trust the perfection of
the creation so far, as to believe that whatever curiosity the order of things has awakened in our minds,
the order of things can satisfy. Every man's condition is a solution in hieroglyphic to those inquiries he
would put. He acts it as life, before he apprehends it as truth. In like manner, nature is already, in its
forms and tendencies, describing its own design. Let us interrogate the great apparition, that shines so
peacefully around us. Let us inquire, to what end is nature?
All science has one aim, namely, to find a theory of nature. We have theories of races and of
functions, but scarcely yet a remote approach to an idea of creation. We are now so far from the road to
truth, that religious teachers dispute and hate each other, and speculative men are esteemed unsound
and frivolous. But to a sound judgment, the most abstract truth is the most practical. Whenever a true
theory appears, it will be its own evidence. Its test is, that it will explain all phenomena. Now many are
thought not only unexplained but inexplicable; as language, sleep, madness, dreams, beasts, sex.
Philosophically considered, the universe is composed of Nature and the Soul. Strictly speaking,
therefore, all that is separate from us, all which Philosophy distinguishes as the NOT ME, that is, both
nature and art, all other men and my own body, must be ranked under this name, NATURE. In
enumerating the values of nature and casting up their sum, I shall use the word in both senses; — in its
common and in its philosophical import. In inquiries so general as our present one, the inaccuracy is
not material; no confusion of thought will occur. Nature, in the common sense, refers to essences
unchanged by man; space, the air, the river, the leaf. Art is applied to the mixture of his will with the
same things, as in a house, a canal, a statue, a picture. But his operations taken together are so
insignificant, a little chipping, baking, patching, and washing, that in an impression so grand as that of
the world on the human mind, they do not vary the result.
Nature
Chapter I from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
To go into solitude, a man needs to retire as much from his chamber as from society. I am not
solitary whilst I read and write, though nobody is with me. But if a man would be alone, let him look at
the stars. The rays that come from those heavenly worlds, will separate between him and what he
touches. One might think the atmosphere was made transparent with this design, to give man, in the
heavenly bodies, the perpetual presence of the sublime. Seen in the streets of cities, how great they are!
If the stars should appear one night in a thousand years, how would men believe and adore; and
preserve for many generations the remembrance of the city of God which had been shown! But every
night come out these envoys of beauty, and light the universe with their admonishing smile.
The stars awaken a certain reverence, because though always present, they are inaccessible; but all
natural objects make a kindred impression, when the mind is open to their influence. Nature never
wears a mean appearance. Neither does the wisest man extort her secret, and lose his curiosity by
finding out all her perfection. Nature never became a toy to a wise spirit. The flowers, the animals, the
mountains, reflected the wisdom of his best hour, as much as they had delighted the simplicity of his
childhood. When we speak of nature in this manner, we have a distinct but most poetical sense in the
mind. We mean the integrity of impression made by manifold natural objects. It is this which
distinguishes the stick of timber of the wood-cutter, from the tree of the poet. The charming landscape
which I saw this morning, is indubitably made up of some twenty or thirty farms. Miller owns this
field, Locke that, and Manning the woodland beyond. But none of them owns the landscape. There is a
property in the horizon which no man has but he whose eye can integrate all the parts, that is, the poet.
This is the best part of these men's farms, yet to this their warranty-deeds give no title. To speak truly,
few adult persons can see nature. Most persons do not see the sun. At least they have a very superficial
seeing. The sun illuminates only the eye of the man, but shines into the eye and the heart of the child.
The lover of nature is he whose inward and outward senses are still truly adjusted to each other; who
has retained the spirit of infancy even into the era of manhood. His intercourse with heaven and earth,
becomes part of his daily food. In the presence of nature, a wild delight runs through the man, in spite
of real sorrows. Nature says, — he is my creature, and maugre all his impertinent griefs, he shall be
glad with me. Not the sun or the summer alone, but every hour and season yields its tribute of delight;
for every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind, from breathless
noon to grimmest midnight. Nature is a setting that fits equally well a comic or a mourning piece. In
good health, the air is a cordial of incredible virtue. Crossing a bare common, in snow puddles, at
twilight, under a clouded sky, without having in my thoughts any occurrence of special good fortune, I
have enjoyed a perfect exhilaration. I am glad to the brink of fear. In the woods too, a man casts off his
years, as the snake his slough, and at what period soever of life, is always a child. In the woods, is
perpetual youth. Within these plantations of God, a decorum and sanctity reign, a perennial festival is
dressed, and the guest sees not how he should tire of them in a thousand years. In the woods, we
return to reason and faith. There I feel that nothing can befall me in life, — no disgrace, no calamity,
(leaving me my eyes,) which nature cannot repair. Standing on the bare ground, — my head bathed by
the blithe air, and uplifted into infinite space, — all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent
eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or
particle of God. The name of the nearest friend sounds then foreign and accidental: to be brothers, to
be acquaintances, — master or servant, is then a trifle and a disturbance. I am the lover of uncontained
and immortal beauty. In the wilderness, I find something more dear and connate than in streets or
villages. In the tranquil landscape, and especially in the distant line of the horizon, man beholds
somewhat as beautiful as his own nature.
The greatest delight which the fields and woods minister, is the suggestion of an occult relation
between man and the vegetable. I am not alone and unacknowledged. They nod to me, and I to them.
The waving of the boughs in the storm, is new to me and old. It takes me by surprise, and yet is not
unknown. Its effect is like that of a higher thought or a better emotion coming over me, when I deemed
I was thinking justly or doing right.
Yet it is certain that the power to produce this delight, does not reside in nature, but in man, or in a
harmony of both. It is necessary to use these pleasures with great temperance. For, nature is not
always tricked in holiday attire, but the same scene which yesterday breathed perfume and glittered as
for the frolic of the nymphs, is overspread with melancholy today. Nature always wears the colors of
the spirit. To a man laboring under calamity, the heat of his own fire hath sadness in it. Then, there is a
kind of contempt of the landscape felt by him who has just lost by death a dear friend. The sky is less
grand as it shuts down over less worth in the population.
Commodity
Chapter II from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Whoever considers the final cause of the world, will discern a multitude of uses that result. They all
admit of being thrown into one of the following classes; Commodity; Beauty; Language; and
Discipline.
Under the general name of Commodity, I rank all those advantages which our senses owe to
nature. This, of course, is a benefit which is temporary and mediate, not ultimate, like its service to the
soul. Yet although low, it is perfect in its kind, and is the only use of nature which all men apprehend.
The misery of man appears like childish petulance, when we explore the steady and prodigal provision
that has been made for his support and delight on this green ball which floats him through the
heavens. What angels invented these splendid ornaments, these rich conveniences, this ocean of air
above, this ocean of water beneath, this firmament of earth between? this zodiac of lights, this tent of
dropping clouds, this striped coat of climates, this fourfold year? Beasts, fire, water, stones, and corn
serve him. The field is at once his floor, his work-yard, his play-ground, his garden, and his bed.
"More servants wait on man
Than he'll take notice of." ———
Nature, in its ministry to man, is not only the material, but is also the process and the result. All the
parts incessantly work into each other's hands for the profit of man. The wind sows the seed; the sun
evaporates the sea; the wind blows the vapor to the field; the ice, on the other side of the planet,
condenses rain on this; the rain feeds the plant; the plant feeds the animal; and thus the endless
circulations of the divine charity nourish man. The useful arts are reproductions or new combinations
by the wit of man, of the same natural benefactors. He no longer waits for favoring gales, but by means
of steam, he realizes the fable of Aeolus's bag, and carries the two and thirty winds in the boiler of his
boat. To diminish friction, he paves the road with iron bars, and, mounting a coach with a ship-load of
men, animals, and merchandise behind him, he darts through the country, from town to town, like an
eagle or a swallow through the air. By the aggregate of these aids, how is the face of the world changed,
from the era of Noah to that of Napoleon! The private poor man hath cities, ships, canals, bridges, built
for him. He goes to the post-office, and the human race run on his errands; to the book-shop, and the
human race read and write of all that happens, for him; to the court-house, and nations repair his
wrongs. He sets his house upon the road, and the human race go forth every morning, and shovel out
the snow, and cut a path for him.
But there is no need of specifying particulars in this class of uses. The catalogue is endless, and the
examples so obvious, that I shall leave them to the reader's reflection, with the general remark, that
this mercenary benefit is one which has respect to a farther good. A man is fed, not that he may be fed,
but that he may work.
Beauty
from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Language
Chapter IV from Nature, published in Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Language is a third use which Nature subserves to man. Nature is the vehicle, and threefold degree.
1. Words are signs of natural facts.
2. Particular natural facts are symbols of particular spiritual facts.
3. Nature is the symbol of spirit.
1. Words are signs of natural facts. The use of natural history is to give us aid in supernatural
history: the use of the outer creation, to give us language for the beings and changes of the inward
creation. Every word which is used to express a moral or intellectual fact, if traced to its root, is found
to be borrowed from some material appearance. Right means straight; wrong means twisted. Spirit
primarily means wind; transgression, the crossing of a line; supercilious, the raising of the eyebrow.
We say the heart to express emotion, the head to denote thought; and thought and emotion are words
borrowed from sensible things, and now appropriated to spiritual nature. Most of the process by which
this transformation is made, is hidden from us in the remote time when language was framed; but the
same tendency may be daily observed in children. Children and savages use only nouns or names of
things, which they convert into verbs, and apply to analogous mental acts.
2. But this origin of all words that convey a spiritual import, — so conspicuous a fact in the history
of language, — is our least debt to nature. It is not words only that are emblematic; it is things which
are emblematic. Every natural fact is a symbol of some spiritual fact. Every appearance in nature
corresponds to some state of the mind, and that state of the mind can only be described by presenting
that natural appearance as its picture. An enraged man is a lion, a cunning man is a fox, a firm man is a
rock, a learned man is a torch. A lamb is innocence; a snake is subtle spite; flowers express to us the
delicate affections. Light and darkness are our familiar expression for knowledge and ignorance; and
heat for love. Visible distance behind and before us, is respectively our image of memory and hope.
Who looks upon a river in a meditative hour, and is not reminded of the flux of all things? Throw a
stone into the stream, and the circles that propagate themselves are the beautiful type of all influence.
Man is conscious of a universal soul within or behind his individual life, wherein, as in a firmament,
the natures of Justice, Truth, Love, Freedom, arise and shine. This universal soul, he calls Reason: it is
not mine, or thine, or his, but we are its; we are its property and men. And the blue sky in which the
private earth is buried, the sky with its eternal calm, and full of everlasting orbs, is the type of Reason.
That which, intellectually considered, we call Reason, considered in relation to nature, we call Spirit.
Spirit is the Creator. Spirit hath life in itself. And man in all ages and countries, embodies it in his
language, as the FATHER.
It is easily seen that there is nothing lucky or capricious in these analogies, but that they are
constant, and pervade nature. These are not the dreams of a few poets, here and there, but man is an
analogist, and studies relations in all objects. He is placed in the centre of beings, and a ray of relation
passes from every other being to him. And neither can man be understood without these objects, nor
these objects without man. All the facts in natural history taken by themselves, have no value, but are
barren, like a single sex. But marry it to human history, and it is full of life. Whole Floras, all Linnaeus'
and Buffon's volumes, are dry catalogues of facts; but the most trivial of these facts, the habit of a
plant, the organs, or work, or noise of an insect, applied to the illustration of a fact in intellectual
philosophy, or, in any way associated to human nature, affects us in the most lively and agreeable
manner. The seed of a plant, — to what affecting analogies in the nature of man, is that little fruit made
use of, in all discourse, up to the voice of Paul, who calls the human corpse a seed, — "It is sown a
natural body; it is raised a spiritual body." The motion of the earth round its axis, and round the sun,
makes the day, and the year. These are certain amounts of brute light and heat. But is there no intent
of an analogy between man's life and the seasons? And do the seasons gain no grandeur or pathos from
that analogy? The instincts of the ant are very unimportant, considered as the ant's; but the moment a
ray of relation is seen to extend from it to man, and the little drudge is seen to be a monitor, a little
body with a mighty heart, then all its habits, even that said to be recently observed, that it never sleeps,
become sublime.
Because of this radical correspondence between visible things and human thoughts, savages, who
have only what is necessary, converse in figures. As we go back in history, language becomes more
picturesque, until its infancy, when it is all poetry; or all spiritual facts are represented by natural
symbols. The same symbols are found to make the original elements of all languages. It has moreover
been observed, that the idioms of all languages approach each other in passages of the greatest
eloquence and power. And as this is the first language, so is it the last. This immediate dependence of
language upon nature, this conversion of an outward phenomenon into a type of somewhat in human
life, never loses its power to affect us. It is this which gives that piquancy to the conversation of a
strong-natured farmer or back-woodsman, which all men relish.
A man's power to connect his thought with its proper symbol, and so to utter it, depends on the
simplicity of his character, that is, upon his love of truth, and his desire to communicate it without
loss. The corruption of man is followed by the corruption of language. When simplicity of character
and the sovereignty of ideas is broken up by the prevalence of secondary desires, the desire of riches, of
pleasure, of power, and of praise, — and duplicity and falsehood take place of simplicity and truth, the
power over nature as an interpreter of the will, is in a degree lost; new imagery ceases to be created,
and old words are perverted to stand for things which are not; a paper currency is employed, when
there is no bullion in the vaults. In due time, the fraud is manifest, and words lose all power to
stimulate the understanding or the affections. Hundreds of writers may be found in every long-
civilized nation, who for a short time believe, and make others believe, that they see and utter truths,
who do not of themselves clothe one thought in its natural garment, but who feed unconsciously on the
language created by the primary writers of the country, those, namely, who hold primarily on nature.
But wise men pierce this rotten diction and fasten words again to visible things; so that picturesque
language is at once a commanding certificate that he who employs it, is a man in alliance with truth
and God. The moment our discourse rises above the ground line of familiar facts, and is inflamed with
passion or exalted by thought, it clothes itself in images. A man conversing in earnest, if he watch his
intellectual processes, will find that a material image, more or less luminous, arises in his mind,
cotemporaneous with every thought, which furnishes the vestment of the thought. Hence, good writing
and brilliant discourse are perpetual allegories. This imagery is spontaneous. It is the blending of
experience with the present action of the mind. It is proper creation. It is the working of the Original
Cause through the instruments he has already made.
These facts may suggest the advantage which the country-life possesses for a powerful mind, over
the artificial and curtailed life of cities. We know more from nature than we can at will communicate.
Its light flows into the mind evermore, and we forget its presence. The poet, the orator, bred in the
woods, whose senses have been nourished by their fair and appeasing changes, year after year, without
design and without heed, — shall not lose their lesson altogether, in the roar of cities or the broil of
politics. Long hereafter, amidst agitation and terror in national councils, — in the hour of revolution, —
these solemn images shall reappear in their morning lustre, as fit symbols and words of the thoughts
which the passing events shall awaken. At the call of a noble sentiment, again the woods wave, the
pines murmur, the river rolls and shines, and the cattle low upon the mountains, as he saw and heard
them in his infancy. And with these forms, the spells of persuasion, the keys of power are put into his
hands.
3. We are thus assisted by natural objects in the expression of particular meanings. But how great a
language to convey such pepper-corn informations! Did it need such noble races of creatures, this
profusion of forms, this host of orbs in heaven, to furnish man with the dictionary and grammar of his
municipal speech? Whilst we use this grand cipher to expedite the affairs of our pot and kettle, we feel
that we have not yet put it to its use, neither are able. We are like travellers using the cinders of a
volcano to roast their eggs. Whilst we see that it always stands ready to clothe what we would say, we
cannot avoid the question, whether the characters are not significant of themselves. Have mountains,
and waves, and skies, no significance but what we consciously give them, when we employ them as
emblems of our thoughts? The world is emblematic. Parts of speech are metaphors, because the whole
of nature is a metaphor of the human mind. The laws of moral nature answer to those of matter as face
to face in a glass. "The visible world and the relation of its parts, is the dial plate of the invisible." The
axioms of physics translate the laws of ethics. Thus, "the whole is greater than its part;" "reaction is
equal to action;" "the smallest weight may be made to lift the greatest, the difference of weight being
compensated by time;" and many the like propositions, which have an ethical as well as physical sense.
These propositions have a much more extensive and universal sense when applied to human life, than
when confined to technical use.
In like manner, the memorable words of history, and the proverbs of nations, consist usually of a
natural fact, selected as a picture or parable of a moral truth. Thus; A rolling stone gathers no moss; A
bird in the hand is worth two in the bush; A cripple in the right way, will beat a racer in the wrong;
Make hay while the sun shines; 'T is hard to carry a full cup even; Vinegar is the son of wine; The last
ounce broke the camel's back; Long-lived trees make roots first; — and the like. In their primary sense
these are trivial facts, but we repeat them for the value of their analogical import. What is true of
proverbs, is true of all fables, parables, and allegories.
This relation between the mind and matter is not fancied by some poet, but stands in the will of
God, and so is free to be known by all men. It appears to men, or it does not appear. When in fortunate
hours we ponder this miracle, the wise man doubts, if, at all other times, he is not blind and deaf;
——— "Can these things be,
And overcome us like a summer's cloud,
Without our special wonder?"
for the universe becomes transparent, and the light of higher laws than its own, shines through it.
It is the standing problem which has exercised the wonder and the study of every fine genius since the
world began; from the era of the Egyptians and the Brahmins, to that of Pythagoras, of Plato, of Bacon,
of Leibnitz, of Swedenborg. There sits the Sphinx at the road-side, and from age to age, as each
prophet comes by, he tries his fortune at reading her riddle. There seems to be a necessity in spirit to
manifest itself in material forms; and day and night, river and storm, beast and bird, acid and alkali,
preexist in necessary Ideas in the mind of God, and are what they are by virtue of preceding affections,
in the world of spirit. A Fact is the end or last issue of spirit. The visible creation is the terminus or the
circumference of the invisible world. "Material objects," said a French philosopher, "are necessarily
kinds of scoriae of the substantial thoughts of the Creator, which must always preserve an exact
relation to their first origin; in other words, visible nature must have a spiritual and moral side."
This doctrine is abstruse, and though the images of "garment," "scoriae," "mirror," &c., may
stimulate the fancy, we must summon the aid of subtler and more vital expositors to make it plain.
"Every scripture is to be interpreted by the same spirit which gave it forth," — is the fundamental law
of criticism. A life in harmony with nature, the love of truth and of virtue, will purge the eyes to
understand her text. By degrees we may come to know the primitive sense of the permanent objects of
nature, so that the world shall be to us an open book, and every form significant of its hidden life and
final cause.
A new interest surprises us, whilst, under the view now suggested, we contemplate the fearful
extent and multitude of objects; since "every object rightly seen, unlocks a new faculty of the soul."
That which was unconscious truth, becomes, when interpreted and defined in an object, a part of the
domain of knowledge, — a new weapon in the magazine of power.
Discipline
Chapter V from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
In view of the significance of nature, we arrive at once at a new fact, that nature is a discipline. This
use of the world includes the preceding uses, as parts of itself.
Space, time, society, labor, climate, food, locomotion, the animals, the mechanical forces, give us
sincerest lessons, day by day, whose meaning is unlimited. They educate both the Understanding and
the Reason. Every property of matter is a school for the understanding, — its solidity or resistance, its
inertia, its extension, its figure, its divisibility. The understanding adds, divides, combines, measures,
and finds nutriment and room for its activity in this worthy scene. Meantime, Reason transfers all
these lessons into its own world of thought, by perceiving the analogy that marries Matter and Mind.
1. Nature is a discipline of the understanding in intellectual truths. Our dealing with sensible
objects is a constant exercise in the necessary lessons of difference, of likeness, of order, of being and
seeming, of progressive arrangement; of ascent from particular to general; of combination to one end
of manifold forces. Proportioned to the importance of the organ to be formed, is the extreme care with
which its tuition is provided, — a care pretermitted in no single case. What tedious training, day after
day, year after year, never ending, to form the common sense; what continual reproduction of
annoyances, inconveniences, dilemmas; what rejoicing over us of little men; what disputing of prices,
what reckonings of interest, — and all to form the Hand of the mind; — to instruct us that "good
thoughts are no better than good dreams, unless they be executed!"
The same good office is performed by Property and its filial systems of debt and credit. Debt,
grinding debt, whose iron face the widow, the orphan, and the sons of genius fear and hate; — debt,
which consumes so much time, which so cripples and disheartens a great spirit with cares that seem so
base, is a preceptor whose lessons cannot be forgone, and is needed most by those who suffer from it
most. Moreover, property, which has been well compared to snow, — "if it fall level to-day, it will be
blown into drifts to-morrow," — is the surface action of internal machinery, like the index on the face
of a clock. Whilst now it is the gymnastics of the understanding, it is hiving in the foresight of the
spirit, experience in profounder laws.
The whole character and fortune of the individual are affected by the least inequalities in the
culture of the understanding; for example, in the perception of differences. Therefore is Space, and
therefore Time, that man may know that things are not huddled and lumped, but sundered and
individual. A bell and a plough have each their use, and neither can do the office of the other. Water is
good to drink, coal to burn, wool to wear; but wool cannot be drunk, nor water spun, nor coal eaten.
The wise man shows his wisdom in separation, in gradation, and his scale of creatures and of merits is
as wide as nature. The foolish have no range in their scale, but suppose every man is as every other
man. What is not good they call the worst, and what is not hateful, they call the best.
In like manner, what good heed, nature forms in us! She pardons no mistakes. Her yea is yea, and
her nay, nay.
The first steps in Agriculture, Astronomy, Zoology, (those first steps which the farmer, the hunter,
and the sailor take,) teach that nature's dice are always loaded; that in her heaps and rubbish are
concealed sure and useful results.
How calmly and genially the mind apprehends one after another the laws of physics! What noble
emotions dilate the mortal as he enters into the counsels of the creation, and feels by knowledge the
privilege to BE! His insight refines him. The beauty of nature shines in his own breast. Man is greater
that he can see this, and the universe less, because Time and Space relations vanish as laws are known.
Here again we are impressed and even daunted by the immense Universe to be explored. "What we
know, is a point to what we do not know." Open any recent journal of science, and weigh the problems
suggested concerning Light, Heat, Electricity, Magnetism, Physiology, Geology, and judge whether the
interest of natural science is likely to be soon exhausted.
Passing by many particulars of the discipline of nature, we must not omit to specify two.
The exercise of the Will or the lesson of power is taught in every event. From the child's successive
possession of his several senses up to the hour when he saith, "Thy will be done!" he is learning the
secret, that he can reduce under his will, not only particular events, but great classes, nay the whole
series of events, and so conform all facts to his character. Nature is thoroughly mediate. It is made to
serve. It receives the dominion of man as meekly as the ass on which the Saviour rode. It offers all its
kingdoms to man as the raw material which he may mould into what is useful. Man is never weary of
working it up. He forges the subtile and delicate air into wise and melodious words, and gives them
wing as angels of persuasion and command. One after another, his victorious thought comes up with
and reduces all things, until the world becomes, at last, only a realized will, — the double of the man.
2. Sensible objects conform to the premonitions of Reason and reflect the conscience. All things are
moral; and in their boundless changes have an unceasing reference to spiritual nature. Therefore is
nature glorious with form, color, and motion, that every globe in the remotest heaven; every chemical
change from the rudest crystal up to the laws of life; every change of vegetation from the first principle
of growth in the eye of a leaf, to the tropical forest and antediluvian coal-mine; every animal function
from the sponge up to Hercules, shall hint or thunder to man the laws of right and wrong, and echo the
Ten Commandments. Therefore is nature ever the ally of Religion: lends all her pomp and riches to the
religious sentiment. Prophet and priest, David, Isaiah, Jesus, have drawn deeply from this source. This
ethical character so penetrates the bone and marrow of nature, as to seem the end for which it was
made. Whatever private purpose is answered by any member or part, this is its public and universal
function, and is never omitted. Nothing in nature is exhausted in its first use. When a thing has served
an end to the uttermost, it is wholly new for an ulterior service. In God, every end is converted into a
new means. Thus the use of commodity, regarded by itself, is mean and squalid. But it is to the mind
an education in the doctrine of Use, namely, that a thing is good only so far as it serves; that a
conspiring of parts and efforts to the production of an end, is essential to any being. The first and gross
manifestation of this truth, is our inevitable and hated training in values and wants, in corn and meat.
It has already been illustrated, that every natural process is a version of a moral sentence. The
moral law lies at the centre of nature and radiates to the circumference. It is the pith and marrow of
every substance, every relation, and every process. All things with which we deal, preach to us. What is
a farm but a mute gospel? The chaff and the wheat, weeds and plants, blight, rain, insects, sun, — it is a
sacred emblem from the first furrow of spring to the last stack which the snow of winter overtakes in
the fields. But the sailor, the shepherd, the miner, the merchant, in their several resorts, have each an
experience precisely parallel, and leading to the same conclusion: because all organizations are
radically alike. Nor can it be doubted that this moral sentiment which thus scents the air, grows in the
grain, and impregnates the waters of the world, is caught by man and sinks into his soul. The moral
influence of nature upon every individual is that amount of truth which it illustrates to him. Who can
estimate this? Who can guess how much firmness the sea-beaten rock has taught the fisherman? how
much tranquillity has been reflected to man from the azure sky, over whose unspotted deeps the winds
forevermore drive flocks of stormy clouds, and leave no wrinkle or stain? how much industry and
providence and affection we have caught from the pantomime of brutes? What a searching preacher of
self-command is the varying phenomenon of Health!
Herein is especially apprehended the unity of Nature, — the unity in variety, — which meets us
everywhere. All the endless variety of things make an identical impression. Xenophanes complained in
his old age, that, look where he would, all things hastened back to Unity. He was weary of seeing the
same entity in the tedious variety of forms. The fable of Proteus has a cordial truth. A leaf, a drop, a
crystal, a moment of time is related to the whole, and partakes of the perfection of the whole. Each
particle is a microcosm, and faithfully renders the likeness of the world.
Not only resemblances exist in things whose analogy is obvious, as when we detect the type of the
human hand in the flipper of the fossil saurus, but also in objects wherein there is great superficial
unlikeness. Thus architecture is called "frozen music," by De Stael and Goethe. Vitruvius thought an
architect should be a musician. "A Gothic church," said Coleridge, "is a petrified religion." Michael
Angelo maintained, that, to an architect, a knowledge of anatomy is essential. In Haydn's oratorios, the
notes present to the imagination not only motions, as, of the snake, the stag, and the elephant, but
colors also; as the green grass. The law of harmonic sounds reappears in the harmonic colors. The
granite is differenced in its laws only by the more or less of heat, from the river that wears it away. The
river, as it flows, resembles the air that flows over it; the air resembles the light which traverses it with
more subtile currents; the light resembles the heat which rides with it through Space. Each creature is
only a modification of the other; the likeness in them is more than the difference, and their radical law
is one and the same. A rule of one art, or a law of one organization, holds true throughout nature. So
intimate is this Unity, that, it is easily seen, it lies under the undermost garment of nature, and betrays
its source in Universal Spirit. For, it pervades Thought also. Every universal truth which we express in
words, implies or supposes every other truth. Omne verum vero consonat. It is like a great circle on a
sphere, comprising all possible circles; which, however, may be drawn, and comprise it, in like
manner. Every such truth is the absolute Ens seen from one side. But it has innumerable sides.
The central Unity is still more conspicuous in actions. Words are finite organs of the infinite mind.
They cannot cover the dimensions of what is in truth. They break, chop, and impoverish it. An action is
the perfection and publication of thought. A right action seems to fill the eye, and to be related to all
nature. "The wise man, in doing one thing, does all; or, in the one thing he does rightly, he sees the
likeness of all which is done rightly."
Words and actions are not the attributes of brute nature. They introduce us to the human form, of
which all other organizations appear to be degradations. When this appears among so many that
surround it, the spirit prefers it to all others. It says, 'From such as this, have I drawn joy and
knowledge; in such as this, have I found and beheld myself; I will speak to it; it can speak again; it can
yield me thought already formed and alive.' In fact, the eye, — the mind, — is always accompanied by
these forms, male and female; and these are incomparably the richest informations of the power and
order that lie at the heart of things. Unfortunately, every one of them bears the marks as of some
injury; is marred and superficially defective. Nevertheless, far different from the deaf and dumb nature
around them, these all rest like fountain-pipes on the unfathomed sea of thought and virtue whereto
they alone, of all organizations, are the entrances.
It were a pleasant inquiry to follow into detail their ministry to our education, but where would it
stop? We are associated in adolescent and adult life with some friends, who, like skies and waters, are
coextensive with our idea; who, answering each to a certain affection of the soul, satisfy our desire on
that side; whom we lack power to put at such focal distance from us, that we can mend or even analyze
them. We cannot choose but love them. When much intercourse with a friend has supplied us with a
standard of excellence, and has increased our respect for the resources of God who thus sends a real
person to outgo our ideal; when he has, moreover, become an object of thought, and, whilst his
character retains all its unconscious effect, is converted in the mind into solid and sweet wisdom, — it
is a sign to us that his office is closing, and he is commonly withdrawn from our sight in a short time.
Idealism
Chapter VI from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
Thus is the unspeakable but intelligible and practicable meaning of the world conveyed to man, the
immortal pupil, in every object of sense. To this one end of Discipline, all parts of nature conspire.
A noble doubt perpetually suggests itself, whether this end be not the Final Cause of the Universe;
and whether nature outwardly exists. It is a sufficient account of that Appearance we call the World,
that God will teach a human mind, and so makes it the receiver of a certain number of congruent
sensations, which we call sun and moon, man and woman, house and trade. In my utter impotence to
test the authenticity of the report of my senses, to know whether the impressions they make on me
correspond with outlying objects, what difference does it make, whether Orion is up there in heaven,
or some god paints the image in the firmament of the soul? The relations of parts and the end of the
whole remaining the same, what is the difference, whether land and sea interact, and worlds revolve
and intermingle without number or end, — deep yawning under deep, and galaxy balancing galaxy,
throughout absolute space, — or, whether, without relations of time and space, the same appearances
are inscribed in the constant faith of man? Whether nature enjoy a substantial existence without, or is
only in the apocalypse of the mind, it is alike useful and alike venerable to me. Be it what it may, it is
ideal to me, so long as I cannot try the accuracy of my senses.
The frivolous make themselves merry with the Ideal theory, if its consequences were burlesque; as
if it affected the stability of nature. It surely does not. God never jests with us, and will not compromise
the end of nature, by permitting any inconsequence in its procession. Any distrust of the permanence
of laws, would paralyze the faculties of man. Their permanence is sacredly respected, and his faith
therein is perfect. The wheels and springs of man are all set to the hypothesis of the permanence of
nature. We are not built like a ship to be tossed, but like a house to stand. It is a natural consequence of
this structure, that, so long as the active powers predominate over the reflective, we resist with
indignation any hint that nature is more short-lived or mutable than spirit. The broker, the
wheelwright, the carpenter, the toll-man, are much displeased at the intimation.
But whilst we acquiesce entirely in the permanence of natural laws, the question of the absolute
existence of nature still remains open. It is the uniform effect of culture on the human mind, not to
shake our faith in the stability of particular phenomena, as of heat, water, azote; but to lead us to
regard nature as a phenomenon, not a substance; to attribute necessary existence to spirit; to esteem
nature as an accident and an effect.
To the senses and the unrenewed understanding, belongs a sort of instinctive belief in the absolute
existence of nature. In their view, man and nature are indissolubly joined. Things are ultimates, and
they never look beyond their sphere. The presence of Reason mars this faith. The first effort of thought
tends to relax this despotism of the senses, which binds us to nature as if we were a part of it, and
shows us nature aloof, and, as it were, afloat. Until this higher agency intervened, the animal eye sees,
with wonderful accuracy, sharp outlines and colored surfaces. When the eye of Reason opens, to
outline and surface are at once added, grace and expression. These proceed from imagination and
affection, and abate somewhat of the angular distinctness of objects. If the Reason be stimulated to
more earnest vision, outlines and surfaces become transparent, and are no longer seen; causes and
spirits are seen through them. The best moments of life are these delicious awakenings of the higher
powers, and the reverential withdrawing of nature before its God.
Let us proceed to indicate the effects of culture. 1. Our first institution in the Ideal philosophy is a
hint from nature herself.
Nature is made to conspire with spirit to emancipate us. Certain mechanical changes, a small
alteration in our local position apprizes us of a dualism. We are strangely affected by seeing the shore
from a moving ship, from a balloon, or through the tints of an unusual sky. The least change in our
point of view, gives the whole world a pictorial air. A man who seldom rides, needs only to get into a
coach and traverse his own town, to turn the street into a puppet-show. The men, the women, —
talking, running, bartering, fighting, — the earnest mechanic, the lounger, the beggar, the boys, the
dogs, are unrealized at once, or, at least, wholly detached from all relation to the observer, and seen as
apparent, not substantial beings. What new thoughts are suggested by seeing a face of country quite
familiar, in the rapid movement of the rail-road car! Nay, the most wonted objects, (make a very slight
change in the point of vision,) please us most. In a camera obscura, the butcher's cart, and the figure of
one of our own family amuse us. So a portrait of a well-known face gratifies us. Turn the eyes upside
down, by looking at the landscape through your legs, and how agreeable is the picture, though you
have seen it any time these twenty years!
In these cases, by mechanical means, is suggested the difference between the observer and the
spectacle, — between man and nature. Hence arises a pleasure mixed with awe; I may say, a low degree
of the sublime is felt from the fact, probably, that man is hereby apprized, that, whilst the world is a
spectacle, something in himself is stable.
2. In a higher manner, the poet communicates the same pleasure. By a few strokes he delineates, as
on air, the sun, the mountain, the camp, the city, the hero, the maiden, not different from what we
know them, but only lifted from the ground and afloat before the eye. He unfixes the land and the sea,
makes them revolve around the axis of his primary thought, and disposes them anew. Possessed
himself by a heroic passion, he uses matter as symbols of it. The sensual man conforms thoughts to
things; the poet conforms things to his thoughts. The one esteems nature as rooted and fast; the other,
as fluid, and impresses his being thereon. To him, the refractory world is ductile and flexible; he
invests dust and stones with humanity, and makes them the words of the Reason. The Imagination
may be defined to be, the use which the Reason makes of the material world. Shakspeare possesses the
power of subordinating nature for the purposes of expression, beyond all poets. His imperial muse
tosses the creation like a bauble from hand to hand, and uses it to embody any caprice of thought that
is upper-most in his mind. The remotest spaces of nature are visited, and the farthest sundered things
are brought together, by a subtle spiritual connection. We are made aware that magnitude of material
things is relative, and all objects shrink and expand to serve the passion of the poet. Thus, in his
sonnets, the lays of birds, the scents and dyes of flowers, he finds to be the shadow of his beloved;
time, which keeps her from him, is his chest; the suspicion she has awakened, is her ornament;
The ornament of beauty is Suspect,
A crow which flies in heaven's sweetest air.
His passion is not the fruit of chance; it swells, as he speaks, to a city, or a state.
No, it was builded far from accident;
It suffers not in smiling pomp, nor falls
Under the brow of thralling discontent;
It fears not policy, that heretic,
That works on leases of short numbered hours,
But all alone stands hugely politic.
In the strength of his constancy, the Pyramids seem to him recent and transitory. The freshness of
youth and love dazzles him with its resemblance to morning.
Take those lips away
Which so sweetly were forsworn;
And those eyes, — the break of day,
Lights that do mislead the morn.
The wild beauty of this hyperbole, I may say, in passing, it would not be easy to match in literature.
This transfiguration which all material objects undergo through the passion of the poet, — this
power which he exerts to dwarf the great, to magnify the small, — might be illustrated by a thousand
examples from his Plays. I have before me the Tempest, and will cite only these few lines.
ARIEL. The strong based promontory
Have I made shake, and by the spurs plucked up
The pine and cedar.
Prospero calls for music to soothe the frantic Alonzo, and his companions;
A solemn air, and the best comforter
To an unsettled fancy, cure thy brains
Now useless, boiled within thy skull.
Again;
The charm dissolves apace,
And, as the morning steals upon the night,
Melting the darkness, so their rising senses
Begin to chase the ignorant fumes that mantle
Their clearer reason.
Their understanding
Begins to swell: and the approaching tide
Will shortly fill the reasonable shores
That now lie foul and muddy.
The perception of real affinities between events, (that is to say, of ideal affinities, for those only are
real,) enables the poet thus to make free with the most imposing forms and phenomena of the world,
and to assert the predominance of the soul.
3. Whilst thus the poet animates nature with his own thoughts, he differs from the philosopher
only herein, that the one proposes Beauty as his main end; the other Truth. But the philosopher, not
less than the poet, postpones the apparent order and relations of things to the empire of thought. "The
problem of philosophy," according to Plato, "is, for all that exists conditionally, to find a ground
unconditioned and absolute." It proceeds on the faith that a law determines all phenomena, which
being known, the phenomena can be predicted. That law, when in the mind, is an idea. Its beauty is
infinite. The true philosopher and the true poet are one, and a beauty, which is truth, and a truth,
which is beauty, is the aim of both. Is not the charm of one of Plato's or Aristotle's definitions, strictly
like that of the Antigone of Sophocles? It is, in both cases, that a spiritual life has been imparted to
nature; that the solid seeming block of matter has been pervaded and dissolved by a thought; that this
feeble human being has penetrated the vast masses of nature with an informing soul, and recognised
itself in their harmony, that is, seized their law. In physics, when this is attained, the memory
disburthens itself of its cumbrous catalogues of particulars, and carries centuries of observation in a
single formula.
Thus even in physics, the material is degraded before the spiritual. The astronomer, the geometer,
rely on their irrefragable analysis, and disdain the results of observation. The sublime remark of Euler
on his law of arches, "This will be found contrary to all experience, yet is true;" had already transferred
nature into the mind, and left matter like an outcast corpse.
4. Intellectual science has been observed to beget invariably a doubt of the existence of matter.
Turgot said, "He that has never doubted the existence of matter, may be assured he has no aptitude for
metaphysical inquiries." It fastens the attention upon immortal necessary uncreated natures, that is,
upon Ideas; and in their presence, we feel that the outward circumstance is a dream and a shade.
Whilst we wait in this Olympus of gods, we think of nature as an appendix to the soul. We ascend into
their region, and know that these are the thoughts of the Supreme Being. "These are they who were set
up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was. When he prepared the heavens, they
were there; when he established the clouds above, when he strengthened the fountains of the deep.
Then they were by him, as one brought up with him. Of them took he counsel."
Their influence is proportionate. As objects of science, they are accessible to few men. Yet all men
are capable of being raised by piety or by passion, into their region. And no man touches these divine
natures, without becoming, in some degree, himself divine. Like a new soul, they renew the body. We
become physically nimble and lightsome; we tread on air; life is no longer irksome, and we think it will
never be so. No man fears age or misfortune or death, in their serene company, for he is transported
out of the district of change. Whilst we behold unveiled the nature of Justice and Truth, we learn the
difference between the absolute and the conditional or relative. We apprehend the absolute. As it were,
for the first time, we exist. We become immortal, for we learn that time and space are relations of
matter; that, with a perception of truth, or a virtuous will, they have no affinity.
5. Finally, religion and ethics, which may be fitly called, — the practice of ideas, or the introduction
of ideas into life, — have an analogous effect with all lower culture, in degrading nature and suggesting
its dependence on spirit. Ethics and religion differ herein; that the one is the system of human duties
commencing from man; the other, from God. Religion includes the personality of God; Ethics does not.
They are one to our present design. They both put nature under foot. The first and last lesson of
religion is, "The things that are seen, are temporal; the things that are unseen, are eternal." It puts an
affront upon nature. It does that for the unschooled, which philosophy does for Berkeley and Viasa.
The uniform language that may be heard in the churches of the most ignorant sects, is,———"Contemn
the unsubstantial shows of the world; they are vanities, dreams, shadows, unrealities; seek the realities
of religion." The devotee flouts nature. Some theosophists have arrived at a certain hostility and
indignation towards matter, as the Manichean and Plotinus. They distrusted in themselves any looking
back to these flesh-pots of Egypt. Plotinus was ashamed of his body. In short, they might all say of
matter, what Michael Angelo said of external beauty, "it is the frail and weary weed, in which God
dresses the soul, which he has called into time."
It appears that motion, poetry, physical and intellectual science, and religion, all tend to affect our
convictions of the reality of the external world. But I own there is something ungrateful in expanding
too curiously the particulars of the general proposition, that all culture tends to imbue us with
idealism. I have no hostility to nature, but a child's love to it. I expand and live in the warm day like
corn and melons. Let us speak her fair. I do not wish to fling stones at my beautiful mother, nor soil my
gentle nest. I only wish to indicate the true position of nature in regard to man, wherein to establish
man, all right education tends; as the ground which to attain is the object of human life, that is, of
man's connection with nature. Culture inverts the vulgar views of nature, and brings the mind to call
that apparent, which it uses to call real, and that real, which it uses to call visionary. Children, it is true,
believe in the external world. The belief that it appears only, is an afterthought, but with culture, this
faith will as surely arise on the mind as did the first.
The advantage of the ideal theory over the popular faith, is this, that it presents the world in
precisely that view which is most desirable to the mind. It is, in fact, the view which Reason, both
speculative and practical, that is, philosophy and virtue, take. For, seen in the light of thought, the
world always is phenomenal; and virtue subordinates it to the mind. Idealism sees the world in God. It
beholds the whole circle of persons and things, of actions and events, of country and religion, not as
painfully accumulated, atom after atom, act after act, in an aged creeping Past, but as one vast picture,
which God paints on the instant eternity, for the contemplation of the soul. Therefore the soul holds
itself off from a too trivial and microscopic study of the universal tablet. It respects the end too much,
to immerse itself in the means. It sees something more important in Christianity, than the scandals of
ecclesiastical history, or the niceties of criticism; and, very incurious concerning persons or miracles,
and not at all disturbed by chasms of historical evidence, it accepts from God the phenomenon, as it
finds it, as the pure and awful form of religion in the world. It is not hot and passionate at the
appearance of what it calls its own good or bad fortune, at the union or opposition of other persons. No
man is its enemy. It accepts whatsoever befalls, as part of its lesson. It is a watcher more than a doer,
and it is a doer, only that it may the better watch.
Spirit
Chapter VII from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
It is essential to a true theory of nature and of man, that it should contain somewhat progressive.
Uses that are exhausted or that may be, and facts that end in the statement, cannot be all that is true of
this brave lodging wherein man is harbored, and wherein all his faculties find appropriate and endless
exercise. And all the uses of nature admit of being summed in one, which yields the activity of man an
infinite scope. Through all its kingdoms, to the suburbs and outskirts of things, it is faithful to the
cause whence it had its origin. It always speaks of Spirit. It suggests the absolute. It is a perpetual
effect. It is a great shadow pointing always to the sun behind us.
The aspect of nature is devout. Like the figure of Jesus, she stands with bended head, and hands
folded upon the breast. The happiest man is he who learns from nature the lesson of worship.
Of that ineffable essence which we call Spirit, he that thinks most, will say least. We can foresee
God in the coarse, and, as it were, distant phenomena of matter; but when we try to define and
describe himself, both language and thought desert us, and we are as helpless as fools and savages.
That essence refuses to be recorded in propositions, but when man has worshipped him intellectually,
the noblest ministry of nature is to stand as the apparition of God. It is the organ through which the
universal spirit speaks to the individual, and strives to lead back the individual to it.
When we consider Spirit, we see that the views already presented do not include the whole
circumference of man. We must add some related thoughts.
Three problems are put by nature to the mind; What is matter? Whence is it? and Whereto? The
first of these questions only, the ideal theory answers. Idealism saith: matter is a phenomenon, not a
substance. Idealism acquaints us with the total disparity between the evidence of our own being, and
the evidence of the world's being. The one is perfect; the other, incapable of any assurance; the mind is
a part of the nature of things; the world is a divine dream, from which we may presently awake to the
glories and certainties of day. Idealism is a hypothesis to account for nature by other principles than
those of carpentry and chemistry. Yet, if it only deny the existence of matter, it does not satisfy the
demands of the spirit. It leaves God out of me. It leaves me in the splendid labyrinth of my perceptions,
to wander without end. Then the heart resists it, because it balks the affections in denying substantive
being to men and women. Nature is so pervaded with human life, that there is something of humanity
in all, and in every particular. But this theory makes nature foreign to me, and does not account for
that consanguinity which we acknowledge to it.
Let it stand, then, in the present state of our knowledge, merely as a useful introductory
hypothesis, serving to apprize us of the eternal distinction between the soul and the world.
But when, following the invisible steps of thought, we come to inquire, Whence is matter? and
Whereto? many truths arise to us out of the recesses of consciousness. We learn that the highest is
present to the soul of man, that the dread universal essence, which is not wisdom, or love, or beauty, or
power, but all in one, and each entirely, is that for which all things exist, and that by which they are;
that spirit creates; that behind nature, throughout nature, spirit is present; one and not compound, it
does not act upon us from without, that is, in space and time, but spiritually, or through ourselves:
therefore, that spirit, that is, the Supreme Being, does not build up nature around us, but puts it forth
through us, as the life of the tree puts forth new branches and leaves through the pores of the old. As a
plant upon the earth, so a man rests upon the bosom of God; he is nourished by unfailing fountains,
and draws, at his need, inexhaustible power. Who can set bounds to the possibilities of man? Once
inhale the upper air, being admitted to behold the absolute natures of justice and truth, and we learn
that man has access to the entire mind of the Creator, is himself the creator in the finite. This view,
which admonishes me where the sources of wisdom and power lie, and points to virtue as to
"The golden key
Which opes the palace of eternity,"
carries upon its face the highest certificate of truth, because it animates me to create my own world
through the purification of my soul.
The world proceeds from the same spirit as the body of man. It is a remoter and inferior
incarnation of God, a projection of God in the unconscious. But it differs from the body in one
important respect. It is not, like that, now subjected to the human will. Its serene order is inviolable by
us. It is, therefore, to us, the present expositor of the divine mind. It is a fixed point whereby we may
measure our departure. As we degenerate, the contrast between us and our house is more evident. We
are as much strangers in nature, as we are aliens from God. We do not understand the notes of birds.
The fox and the deer run away from us; the bear and tiger rend us. We do not know the uses of more
than a few plants, as corn and the apple, the potato and the vine. Is not the landscape, every glimpse of
which hath a grandeur, a face of him? Yet this may show us what discord is between man and nature,
for you cannot freely admire a noble landscape, if laborers are digging in the field hard by. The poet
finds something ridiculous in his delight, until he is out of the sight of men.
Prospects
Chapter VIII from Nature, published as part of Nature; Addresses and Lectures
In inquiries respecting the laws of the world and the frame of things, the highest reason is always
the truest. That which seems faintly possible — it is so refined, is often faint and dim because it is
deepest seated in the mind among the eternal verities. Empirical science is apt to cloud the sight, and,
by the very knowledge of functions and processes, to bereave the student of the manly contemplation
of the whole. The savant becomes unpoetic. But the best read naturalist who lends an entire and
devout attention to truth, will see that there remains much to learn of his relation to the world, and
that it is not to be learned by any addition or subtraction or other comparison of known quantities, but
is arrived at by untaught sallies of the spirit, by a continual self-recovery, and by entire humility. He
will perceive that there are far more excellent qualities in the student than preciseness and infallibility;
that a guess is often more fruitful than an indisputable affirmation, and that a dream may let us deeper
into the secret of nature than a hundred concerted experiments.
For, the problems to be solved are precisely those which the physiologist and the naturalist omit to
state. It is not so pertinent to man to know all the individuals of the animal kingdom, as it is to know
whence and whereto is this tyrannizing unity in his constitution, which evermore separates and
classifies things, endeavoring to reduce the most diverse to one form. When I behold a rich landscape,
it is less to my purpose to recite correctly the order and superposition of the strata, than to know why
all thought of multitude is lost in a tranquil sense of unity. I cannot greatly honor minuteness in
details, so long as there is no hint to explain the relation between things and thoughts; no ray upon the
_metaphysics_ of conchology, of botany, of the arts, to show the relation of the forms of flowers,
shells, animals, architecture, to the mind, and build science upon ideas. In a cabinet of natural history,
we become sensible of a certain occult recognition and sympathy in regard to the most unwieldly and
eccentric forms of beast, fish, and insect. The American who has been confined, in his own country, to
the sight of buildings designed after foreign models, is surprised on entering York Minster or St.
Peter's at Rome, by the feeling that these structures are imitations also, — faint copies of an invisible
archetype. Nor has science sufficient humanity, so long as the naturalist overlooks that wonderful
congruity which subsists between man and the world; of which he is lord, not because he is the most
subtile inhabitant, but because he is its head and heart, and finds something of himself in every great
and small thing, in every mountain stratum, in every new law of color, fact of astronomy, or
atmospheric influence which observation or analysis lay open. A perception of this mystery inspires
the muse of George Herbert, the beautiful psalmist of the seventeenth century. The following lines are
part of his little poem on Man.
"Man is all symmetry,
Full of proportions, one limb to another,
And to all the world besides.
Each part may call the farthest, brother;
For head with foot hath private amity,
And both with moons and tides.
AMONG secular*(7) books, Plato only is entitled to Omar's*(8) fanatical compliment to the Koran,
when he said, "Burn the libraries; for their value is in this book." These sentences contain the culture
of nations; these are the corner-stone of schools; these are the fountain-head of literatures. A
discipline it is in logic, arithmetic, taste, symmetry, poetry, language, rhetoric, ontology, morals or
practical wisdom. There was never such range of speculation. Out of Plato come all things that are still
written and debated among men of thought. Great havoc makes he among our originalities. We have
reached the mountain from which all these drift boulders were detached. The Bible of the learned for
twenty-two hundred years, every brisk young man who says in succession fine things to each reluctant
generation,- Boethius, Rabelais, Erasmus, Bruno, Locke, Rousseau, Alfieri, Coleridge,- is some reader
of Plato, translating into the vernacular, wittily, his good things. Even the men of grander proportion
suffer some deduction from the misfortune (shall I say?) of coming after this exhausting generalizer.
St. Augustine, Copernicus, Newton, Behmen, Swedenborg, Goethe, are likewise his debtors and must
say after him. For it is fair to credit the broadest generalizer with all the particulars deducible from his
thesis.
Plato is philosophy, and philosophy, Plato,- at once the glory and the shame of mankind, since
neither Saxon nor Roman have availed to add any idea to his categories. No wife, no children had he,
and the thinkers of all civilized nations are his posterity and are tinged with his mind. How many great
men Nature is incessantly sending up out of night, to be his men,- Platonists! the Alexandrians, a
constellation of genius; the Elizabethans, not less; Sir Thomas More, Henry More, John Hales, John
Smith, Lord Bacon, Jeremy Taylor, Ralph Cudworth, Sydenham, Thomas Taylor; Marcilius Ficinus
and Picus Mirandola. Calvinism is in his Phaedo: Christianity is in it. Mahometanism draws all its
philosophy, in its hand-book of morals, the Akhlak-y-Jalaly, from him. Mysticism finds in Plato all its
texts. This citizen of a town in Greece is no villager nor patriot. An Englishman reads and says, "how
English!" a German- "how Teutonic!" an Italian- "how Roman and how Greek!" As they say that Helen
of Argos had that universal beauty that every body felt related to her, so Plato seems to a reader in New
England an American genius. His broad humanity transcends all sectional lines.
This range of Plato instructs us what to think of the vexed question concerning his reputed works,-
what are genuine, what spurious. It is singular that wherever we find a man higher by a whole head
than any of his contemporaries, it is sure to come into doubt what are his real works. Thus Homer,
Plato, Raffaelle, Shakespeare. For these men magnetize their contemporaries, so that their
companions can do for them what they can never do for themselves; and the great man does thus live
in several bodies, and write, or paint or act, by many hands; and after some time it is not easy to say
what is the authentic work of the master and what is only of his school.
Plato, too, like every great man, consumed his own times. What is a great man but one of great
affinities, who takes up into himself all arts, sciences, all knowables, as his food? He can spare nothing;
he can dispose of every thing. What is not good for virtue, is good for knowledge. Hence his
contemporaries tax him with plagiarism. But the inventor only knows how to borrow; and society is
glad to forget the innumerable laborers who ministered to this architect, and reserves all its gratitude
for him. When we are praising Plato, it seems we are praising quotations from Solon and Sophron and
Philolaus. Be it so. Every book is a quotation; and every house is a quotation out of all forests and
mines and stone quarries; and every man is a quotation from all his ancestors. And this grasping
inventor puts all nations under contribution.
Plato absorbed the learning of his times,- Philolaus, Timaeus, Heraclitus, Parmenides, and what
else; then his master, Socrates; and finding himself still capable of a larger synthesis,- beyond all
example then or since,- he traveled into Italy, to gain what Pythagoras had for him; then into Egypt,
and perhaps still farther East, to import the other element, which Europe wanted, into the European
mind. This breadth entitles him to stand as the representative of philosophy. He says, in the Republic,
"Such a genius as philosophers must of necessity have, is wont but seldom in all its parts to meet in
one man, but its different parts generally spring up in different persons." Every man who would do
anything well, must come to it from a higher ground. A philosopher must be more than a philosopher.
Plato is clothed with the powers of a poet, stands upon the highest place of the poet, and (though I
doubt he wanted the decisive gift of lyric expression), mainly is not a poet because he chose to use the
poetic gift to an ulterior purpose.
Great geniuses have the shortest biographies. Their cousins can tell you nothing about them. They
lived in their writings, and so their house and street life was trivial and commonplace. If you would
know their tastes and complexions, the most admiring of their readers most resembles them. Plato
especially has no external biography. If he had lover, wife, or children, we hear nothing of them. He
ground them all into paint. As a good chimney burns its smoke, so a philosopher converts the value of
all his fortunes into his intellectual performances.
He was born 427 A.C., about the time of the death of Pericles; was of patrician connection in his
times and city, and is said to have had an early inclination for war, but, in his twentieth year, meeting
with Socrates, was easily dissuaded from this pursuit and remained for ten years his scholar, until the
death of Socrates. He then went to Megara, accepted the invitations of Dion and of Dionysius to the
court of Sicily, and went thither three times, though very capriciously treated. He traveled into Italy;
then into Egypt, where he stayed a long time; some say three,- some say thirteen years. It is said he
went farther, into Babylonia: this is uncertain. Returning to Athens, he gave lessons in the Academy to
those whom his fame drew thither; and died, as we have received it, in the act of writing, at eighty-one
years.
But the biography of Plato is interior. We are to account for the supreme elevation of this man in
the intellectual history of our race,- how it happens that in proportion to the culture of men they
become his scholars; that, as our Jewish Bible has implanted itself in the tabletalk and household life
of every man and woman in the European and American nations, so the writings of Plato have
preoccupied every school of learning, every lover of thought, every church, every poet,- making it
impossible to think, on certain levels, except through him. He stands between the truth and every
man's mind, and has almost impressed language and the primary forms of thought with his name and
seal. I am struck, in reading him, with the extreme modernness of his style and spirit. Here is the germ
of that Europe we know so well, in its long history of arts and arms; here are all its traits, already
discernible in the mind of Plato,- and in none before him. It has spread itself since into a hundred
histories, but has added no new element. This perpetual modernness is the measure of merit in every
work of art; since the author of it was not misled by any thing short-lived or local, but abode by real
and abiding traits. How Plato came thus to be Europe, and philosophy, and almost literature, is the
problem for us to solve.
This could not have happened without a sound, sincere and catholic man, able to honor, at the
same time, the ideal, or laws of the mind, and fate, or the order of nature. The first period of a nation,
as of an individual, is the period of unconscious strength. Children cry, scream and stamp with fury,
unable to express their desires. As soon as they can speak and tell their want and the reason of it, they
become gentle. In adult life, whilst the perceptions are obtuse, men and women talk vehemently and
superlatively, blunder and quarrel: their manners are full of desperation; their speech is full of oaths.
As soon as, with culture, things have cleared up a little, and they see them no longer in lumps and
masses but accurately distributed, they desist from that weak vehemence and explain their meaning in
detail. If the tongue had not been framed for articulation, man would still be a beast in the forest. The
same weakness and want, on a higher plane, occurs daily in the education of ardent young men and
women. "Ah! you don't understand me; I have never met with any one who comprehends me": and
they sigh and weep, write verses and walk alone,- fault of power to express their precise meaning. In a
month or two, through the favor of their good genius, they meet some one so related as to assist their
volcanic estate, and, good communication being once established, they are thenceforward good
citizens. It is ever thus. The progress is to accuracy, to skill, to truth, from blind force.
There is a moment in the history of every nation, when, proceeding out of this brute youth, the
perceptive powers reach their ripeness and have not yet become microscopic: so that man, at that
instant, extends across the entire scale, and, with his feet still planted on the immense forces of night,
converses by his eyes and brain with solar and stellar creation. That is the moment of adult health, the
culmination of power.
Such is the history of Europe, in all points; and such in philosophy. Its early records, almost
perished, are of the immigrations from Asia, bringing with them the dreams of barbarians; a confusion
of crude notions of morals and of natural philosophy, gradually subsiding through the partial insight of
single teachers.
Before Pericles came the Seven Wise Masters, and we have the beginnings of geometry,
metaphysics and ethics: then the partialists,- deducing the origin of things from flux or water, or from
air, or from fire, or from mind. All mix with these causes mythologic pictures. At last comes Plato, the
distributor, who needs no barbaric point, or tattoo, or whooping; for he can define. He leaves with Asia
the vast and superlative; he is the arrival of accuracy and intelligence. "He shall be as a god to me, who
can rightly divide and define."
This defining is philosophy. Philosophy is the account which the human mind gives to itself of the
constitution of the world. Two cardinal facts lie forever at the base; the one, and the two: 1. Unity, or
Identity; and, 2. Variety. We unite all things by perceiving the law which pervades them; by perceiving
the superficial differences and the profound resemblances. But every mental act,- this very perception
of identity or oneness, recognizes the difference of things. Oneness and otherness. It is impossible to
speak or to think without embracing both.
The mind is urged to ask for one cause of many effects; then for the cause of that; and again the
cause, diving still into the profound: self-assured that it shall arrive at an absolute and sufficient one,-
a one that shall be all. "In the midst of the sun is the light, in the midst of the light is truth, and in the
midst of truth is the imperishable being," say the Vedas. All philosophy, of East and West, has the
same centripetence. Urged by an opposite necessity, the mind returns from the one to that which is not
one, but other or many; from cause to effect; and affirms the necessary existence of variety, the self-
existence of both, as each is involved in the other. These strictly-blended elements it is the problem of
thought to separate and to reconcile. Their existence is mutually contradictory and exclusive; and each
so fast slides into the other that we can never say what is one, and what it is not. The Proteus is as
nimble in the highest as in the lowest grounds; when we contemplate the one, the true, the good,- as in
the surfaces and extremities of matter.
In all nations there are minds which incline to dwell in the conception of the fundamental Unity.
The raptures of prayer and ecstasy of devotion lose all being in one Being. This tendency finds its
highest expression in the religious writings of the East, and chiefly in the Indian Scriptures, in the
Vedas, the Bhagavat Geeta, and the Vishnu Purana. Those writings contain little else than this idea,
and they rise to pure and sublime strains in celebrating it.
The Same, the Same: friend and foe are of one stuff; the ploughman, the plough and the furrow are
of one stuff; and the stuff is such and so much that the variations of form are unimportant. "You are
fit" (says the supreme Krishna to a sage) "to apprehend that you are not distinct from me. That which I
am, thou art, and that also is this world, with its gods and heroes and mankind. Men contemplate
distinctions, because they are stupefied with ignorance." "The words I and mine constitute ignorance.
What is the great end of all, you shall now learn from me. It is soul,- one in all bodies, pervading,
uniform, perfect, preeminent over nature, exempt from birth, growth and decay, omnipresent, made
up of true knowledge, independent, unconnected with unrealities, with name, species and the rest, in
time past, present and to come. The knowledge that this spirit, which is essentially one, is in one's own
and in all other bodies, is the wisdom of one who knows the unity of things. As one diffusive air,
passing through the perforations of a flute, is distinguished as the notes of a scale, so the nature of the
Great Spirit is single, though its forms be manifold, arising from the consequences of acts. When the
difference of the investing form, as that of god or the rest, is destroyed, there is no distinction." "The
whole world is but a manifestation of Vishnu, who is identical with all things, and is to be regarded by
the wise as not differing from, but as the same as themselves. I neither am going nor coming; nor is my
dwelling in any one place; nor art thou, thou; nor are others, others; nor am I, I." As if he had said, "All
is for the soul, and the soul is Vishnu; and animals and stars are transient paintings; and light is
whitewash; and durations are deceptive; and form is imprisonment; and heaven itself a decoy." That
which the soul seeks is resolution into being above form, out of Tartarus and out of heaven,- liberation
from nature.
If speculation tends thus to a terrific unity, in which all things are absorbed, action tends directly
backwards to diversity. The first is the course or gravitation of mind; the second is the power of nature.
Nature is the manifold. The unity absorbs, and melts or reduces. Nature opens and creates. These two
principles reappear and interpenetrate all things, all thought; the one, the many. One is being; the
other, intellect: one is necessity; the other, freedom: one, rest; the other, motion: one, power; the
other, distribution: one, strength; the other, pleasure: one, consciousness; the other, definition: one,
genius; the other, talent: one, earnestness; the other, knowledge: one, possession; the other, trade:
one, caste; the other, culture: one, king; the other, democracy: and, if we dare carry these
generalizations a step higher, and name the last tendency of both, we might say, that the end of the one
is escape from organization,- pure science; and the end of the other is the highest instrumentality, or
use of means, or executive deity.
Each student adheres, by temperament and by habit, to the first or to the second of these gods of
the mind. By religion, he tends to unity; by intellect, or by the senses, to the many. A too rapid
unification, and an excessive appliance to parts and particulars, are the twin dangers of speculation.
To this partiality the history of nations corresponded. The country of unity, of immovable
institutions, the seat of a philosophy delighting in abstractions, of men faithful in doctrine and in
practice to the idea of a deaf, unimplorable, immense fate, is Asia; and it realizes this faith in the social
institution of caste. On the other side, the genius of Europe is active and creative: it resists caste by
culture; its philosophy was a discipline; it is a land of arts, inventions, trade, freedom. If the East loved
infinity, the West delighted in boundaries.
European civility is the triumph of talent, the extension of system, the sharpened understanding,
adaptive skill, delight in forms, delight in manifestation, in comprehensible results. Pericles, Athens,
Greece, had been working in this element with the joy of genius not yet chilled by any foresight of the
detriment of an excess. They saw before them no sinister political economy; no ominous Malthus; no
Paris or London; no pitiless subdivision of classes,- the doom of the pin-makers, the doom of the
weavers, of dressers, of stockingers, of carders, of spinners, of colliers; no Ireland; no Indian caste,
superinduced by the efforts of Europe to throw it off. The understanding was in its health and prime.
Art was in its splendid novelty. They cut the Pentelican marble as if it were snow, and their perfect
works in architecture and sculpture seemed things of course, not more difficult than the completion of
a new ship at the Medford yards, or new mills at Lowell. These things are in course, and may be taken
for granted. The Roman legion, Byzantine legislation, English trade, the saloons of Versailles, the cafes
of Paris, the steam-mill, steamboat, steam-coach, may all be seen in perspective; the town-meeting, the
ballot-box, the newspaper and cheap press.
Meantime, Plato, in Egypt and in Eastern pilgrimages, imbibed the idea of one Deity, in which all
things are absorbed. The unity of Asia and the detail of Europe; the infinitude of the Asiatic soul and
the defining, result-loving, machine-making, surface-seeking, opera-going Europe,- Plato came to join,
and, by contact, to enhance the energy of each. The excellence of Europe and Asia are in his brain.
Metaphysics and natural philosophy expressed the genius of Europe; he substructs the religion of Asia,
as the base.
In short, a balanced soul was born, perceptive of the two elements. It is as easy to be great as to be
small. The reason why we do not at once believe in admirable souls is because they are not in our
experience. In actual life, they are so rare as to be incredible; but primarily there is not only no
presumption against them, but the strongest presumption in favor of their appearance. But whether
voices were heard in the sky, or not; whether his mother or his father dreamed that the infant man-
child was the son of Apollo; whether a swarm of bees settled on his lips, or not;- a man who could see
two sides of a thing was born. The wonderful synthesis so familiar in nature; the upper and the under
side of the medal of Jove; the union of impossibilities, which reappears in every object; its real and its
ideal power,- was now also transferred entire to the consciousness of a man.
The balanced soul came. If he loved abstract truth, he saved himself by propounding the most
popular of all principles, the absolute good, which rules rulers, and judges the judge. If he made
transcendental distinctions, he fortified himself by drawing all his illustrations from sources disdained
by orators and polite conversers; from mares and puppies; from pitchers and soup-ladles; from cooks
and criers; the shops of potters, horse-doctors, butchers and fishmongers. He cannot forgive in himself
a partiality, but is resolved that the two poles of thought shall appear in his statement. His argument
and his sentence are self-imposed and spherical. The two poles appear; yes, and become two hands, to
grasp and appropriate their own.
Every great artist has been such by synthesis. Our strength is transitional, alternating; or, shall I
say, a thread of two strands. The sea-shore, sea seen from shore, shore seen from sea; the taste of two
metals in contact; and our enlarged powers at the approach and at the departure of a friend; the
experience of poetic creativeness, which is not found in staying at home, nor yet in traveling, but in
transitions from one to the other, which must therefore be adroitly managed to present as much
transitional surface as possible; this command of two elements must explain the power and the charm
of Plato. Art expresses the one or the same by the different. Thought seeks to know unity in unity;
poetry to show it by variety; that is, always by an object or symbol. Plato keeps the two vases, one of
aether and one of pigment, at his side, and invariably uses both. Things added to things, as statistics,
civil history, are inventories. Things used as language are inexhaustibly attractive. Plato turns
incessantly the obverse and the reverse of the medal of Jove.
To take an example:- The physical philosophers had sketched each his theory of the world; the
theory of atoms, of fire, of flux, of spirit; theories mechanical and chemical in their genius. Plato, a
master of mathematics, studious of all natural laws and causes, feels these, as second causes, to be no
theories of the world but bare inventories and lists. To the study of nature he therefore prefixes the
dogma,- "Let us declare the cause which led the Supreme Ordainer to produce and compose the
universe. He was good; and he who is good has no kind of envy. Exempt from envy, he wished that all
things should be as much as possible like himself. Whosoever, taught by wise men, shall admit this as
the prime cause of the origin and foundation of the world, will be in the truth."*(9) "All things are for
the sake of the good, and it is the cause of every thing beautiful." This dogma animates and
impersonates his philosophy.
The synthesis which makes the character of his mind appears in all his talents. Where there is great
compass of wit, we usually find excellencies that combine easily in the living man, but in description
appear incompatible. The mind of Plato is not to be exhibited by a Chinese catalogue, but is to be
apprehended by an original mind in the exercise of its original power. In him the freest abandonment
is united with the precision of a geometer. His daring imagination gives him the more solid grasp of
facts; as the birds of highest flight have the strongest alar bones. His patrician polish, his intrinsic
elegance, edged by an irony so subtle that it stings and paralyzes, adorn the soundest health and
strength of frame. According to the old sentence, "If Jove should descend to the earth, he would speak
in the style of Plato."
With this palatial air there is, for the direct aim of several of his works and running through the
tenor of them all, a certain earnestness, which mounts, in the Republic and in the Phaedo, to piety. He
has been charged with feigning sickness at the time of the death of Socrates. But the anecdotes that
have come down from the times attest his manly interference before the people in his master's behalf,
since even the savage cry of the assembly to Plato is preserved; and the indignation towards popular
government, in many of his pieces, expresses a personal exasperation. He has a probity, a native
reverence for justice and honor, and a humanity which makes him tender for the superstitions of the
people. Add to this, he believes that poetry, prophecy and the high insight are from a wisdom of which
man is not master; that the gods never philosophize, but by a celestial mania these miracles are
accomplished. Horsed on these winged steeds, he sweeps the dim regions, visits worlds which flesh
cannot enter; he saw the souls in pain, he hears the doom of the judge, he beholds the penal
metempsychosis, the Fates, with the rock and shears, and hears the intoxicating hum of their spindle.
But his circumspection never forsook him. One would say he had read the inscription on the gates
of Busyrane,- "Be bold"; and on the second gate,- "Be bold, be bold, and evermore be bold"; and then
again had paused well at the third gate,- "Be not too bold." His strength is like the momentum of a
falling planet, and his discretion the return of its due and perfect curve,- so excellent is his Greek love
of boundary and his skill in definition. In reading logarithms one is not more secure than in following
Plato in his flights. Nothing can be colder than his head, when the lightnings of his imagination are
playing in the sky. He has finished his thinking before he brings it to the reader, and he abounds in the
surprises of a literary master. He has that opulence which furnishes, at every turn, the precise weapon
he needs. As the rich man wears no more garments, drives no more horses, sits in no more chambers
than the poor,- but has that one dress, or equipage, or instrument, which is fit for the hour and the
need; so Plato, in his plenty, is never restricted, but has the fit word. There is indeed no weapon in all
the armory of wit which he did not possess and use,- epic, analysis, mania, intuition, music, satire and
irony, down to the customary and polite. His illustrations are poetry and his jests illustrations.
Socrates' profession of obstetric art*(10) is good philosophy; and his finding that word "cookery," and
"adulatory art," for rhetoric, in the Gorgias, does us a substantial service still. No orator can measure in
effect with him who can give good nicknames.
What moderation and understatement and checking his thunder in mid volley! He has good-
naturedly furnished the courtier and citizen with all that can be said against the schools. "For
philosophy is an elegant thing, if any one modestly meddles with it; but if he is conversant with it more
than is becoming, it corrupts the man." He could well afford to be generous,- he, who from the sunlike
centrality and reach of his vision, had a faith without cloud. Such as his perception, was his speech: he
plays with the doubt and makes the most of it: he paints and quibbles; and by and by comes a sentence
that moves the sea and land. The admirable earnest comes not only at intervals, in the perfect yes and
no of the dialogue, but in bursts of light. "I, therefore, Callicles, am persuaded by these accounts, and
consider how I may exhibit my soul before the judge in a healthy condition. Wherefore, disregarding
the honors that most men value, and looking to the truth, I shall endeavor in reality to live as
virtuously as I can; and when I die, to die so. And I invite all other men, to the utmost of my power;
and you too I in turn invite to this contest, which, I affirm, surpasses all contests here."*(11)
He is a great average man; one who, to the best thinking, adds a proportion and equality in his
faculties, so that men see in him their own dreams and glimpses made available and made to pass for
what they are. A great common-sense is his warrant and qualification to be the world's interpreter. He
has reason, as all the philosophic and poetic class have: but he has also what they have not,- this strong
solving sense to reconcile his poetry with the appearances of the world, and build a bridge from the
streets of cities to the Atlantis. He omits never this graduation, but slopes his thought, however
picturesque the precipice on one side, to an access from the plain. He never writes in ecstasy, or
catches us up into poetic raptures.
Plato apprehended the cardinal facts. He could prostrate himself on the earth and cover his eyes
whilst he adored that which cannot be numbered, or gauged, or known, or named: that of which every
thing can be affirmed and denied: that "which is entity and nonentity." He called it super-essential. He
even stood ready, as in the Parmenides, to demonstrate that it was so,- that this Being exceeded the
limits of intellect. No man ever more fully acknowledged the Ineffable. Having paid his homage, as for
the human race, to the Illimitable, he then stood erect, and for the human race affirmed, "And yet
things are knowable!"- that is, the Asia in his mind was first heartily honored,- the ocean of love and
power, before form, before will, before knowledge, the Same, the Good, the One; and now, refreshed
and empowered by this worship, the instinct of Europe, namely, culture, returns; and he cries, "Yet
things are knowable!" They are knowable, because being from one, things correspond. There is a scale;
and the correspondence of heaven to earth, of matter to mind, of the part to the whole, is our guide. As
there is a science of stars, called astronomy; a science of quantities, called mathematics; a science of
qualities, called chemistry; so there is a science of sciences,- I call it Dialectic,- which is the Intellect
discriminating the false and the true. It rests on the observation of identity and diversity; for to judge
is to unite to an object the notion which belongs to it. The sciences, even the best,- mathematics and
astronomy,- are like sportsmen, who seize whatever prey offers, even without being able to make any
use of it. Dialectic must teach the use of them. "This is of that rank that no intellectual man will enter
on any study for its own sake, but only with a view to advance himself in that one sole science which
embraces all."*(12)
"The essence or peculiarity of man is to comprehend a whole; or that which in the diversity of
sensations can be comprised under a rational unity." "The soul which has never perceived the truth,
cannot pass into the human form."*(13) I announce to men the Intellect. I announce the good of being
interpenetrated by the mind that made nature: this benefit, namely, that it can understand nature,
which it made and maketh. Nature is good, but intellect is better: as the lawgiver is before the law-
receiver. I give you joy, O sons of men! that truth is altogether wholesome; that we have hope to search
out what might be the very self of everything. The misery of man is to be baulked of the sight of essence
and to be stuffed with conjectures; but the supreme good is reality; the supreme beauty is reality; and
all virtue and all felicity depend on this science of the real: for courage is nothing else than knowledge;
the fairest fortune that can befall man is to be guided by his daemon to that which is truly his own.
This also is the essence of justice,- to attend every one his own: nay, the notion of virtue is not to be
arrived at except through direct contemplation of the divine essence. Courage then for "the persuasion
that we must search that which we do not know, will render us, beyond comparison, better, braver and
more industrious than if we thought it impossible to discover what we do not know, and useless to
search for it." He secures a position not to be commanded, by his passion for reality; valuing
philosophy only as it is the pleasure of conversing with real being.
Thus, full of the genius of Europe, he said, Culture. He saw the institutions of Sparta and
recognized, more genially one would say than any since, the hope of education. He delighted in every
accomplishment, in every graceful and useful and truthful performance; above all in the splendors of
genius and intellectual achievement. "The whole of life, O Socrates," said Glauco, "is, with the wise, the
measure of hearing such discourses as these." What a price he sets on the feats of talent, on the powers
of Pericles, of Isocrates, of Parmenides! What price above price on the talents themselves! He called
the several faculties, gods, in his beautiful personation. What value he gives to the art of gymnastic in
education; what to geometry; what to music; what to astronomy, whose appeasing and medicinal
power he celebrates! In the Timaeus he indicates the highest employment of the eyes. "By us it is
asserted that God invented and bestowed sight on us for this purpose,- that on surveying the circles of
intelligence in the heavens, we might properly employ those of our own minds, which, though
disturbed when compared with the others that are uniform, are still allied to their circulations; and
that having thus learned, and being naturally possessed of a correct reasoning faculty, we might, by
imitating the uniform revolutions of divinity, set right our own wanderings and blunders." And in the
Republic,- "By each of these disciplines a certain organ of the soul is both purified and reanimated
which is blinded and buried by studies of another kind; an organ better worth saving than ten
thousand eyes, since truth is perceived by this alone."
He said, Culture; but he first admitted its basis, and gave immeasurably the first place to
advantages of nature. His patrician tastes laid stress on the distinctions of birth. In the doctrine of the
organic character and disposition is the origin of caste. "Such as were fit to govern, into their
composition the informing Deity mingled gold; into the military, silver; iron and brass for
husbandmen and artificers." The East confirms itself, in all ages, in this faith. The Koran is explicit on
this point of caste. "Men have their metal, as of gold and silver. Those of you who were the worthy ones
in the state of ignorance, will be the worthy ones in the state of faith, as soon as you embrace it." Plato
was not less firm. "Of the five orders of things, only four can be taught to the generality of men." In the
Republic he insists on the temperaments of the youth, as first of the first.
A happier example of the stress laid on nature is in the dialogue with the young Theages, who
wishes to receive lessons from Socrates. Socrates declares that if some have grown wise by associating
with him, no thanks are due to him; but, simply, whilst they were with him they grew wise, not because
of him; he pretends not to know the way of it. "It is adverse to many, nor can those be benefited by
associating with me whom the Daemon opposes; so that it is not possible for me to live with these.
With many however he does not prevent me from conversing, who yet are not at all benefited by
associating with me. Such, O Theages, is the association with me; for, if it pleases the God, you will
make great and rapid proficiency: you will not, if he does not please. Judge whether it is not safer to be
instructed by some one of those who have power over the benefit which they impart to men, than by
me, who benefit or not, just as it may happen." As if he had said, "I have no system. I cannot be
answerable for you. You will be what you must. If there is love between us, inconceivably delicious and
profitable will our intercourse be; if not, your time is lost and you will only annoy me. I shall seem to
you stupid, and the reputation I have, false. Quite above us, beyond the will of you or me, is this secret
affinity or repulsion laid. All my good is magnetic, and I educate, not by lessons, but by going about my
business."
He said, Culture; he said, Nature; and he failed not to add, "There is also the divine." There is no
thought in any mind but it quickly tends to convert itself into a power and organizes a huge
instrumentality of means. Plato, lover of limits, loved the illimitable, saw the enlargement and nobility
which come from truth itself and good itself, and attempted as if on the part of the human intellect,
once for all to do it adequate homage,- homage fit for the immense soul to receive, and yet homage
becoming the intellect to render. He said then, "Our faculties run out into infinity, and return to us
thence. We can define but a little way; but here is a fact which will not be skipped, and which to shut
our eyes upon is suicide. All things are in a scale; and, begin where we will, ascend and ascend. All
things are symbolical; and what we call results are beginnings."
A key to the method and completeness of Plato is his twice bisected line. After he has illustrated the
relation between the absolute good and true and the forms of the intelligible world, he says: "Let there
be a line cut in two unequal parts. Cut again each of these two main parts,- one representing the
visible, the other the intelligible world,- and let these two new sections represent the bright part and
the dark part of each of these worlds. You will have, for one of the sections of the visible world, images,
that is, both shadows and reflections;- for the other section, the objects of these images, that is, plants,
animals, and the works of art and nature. Then divide the intelligible world in like manner; the one
section will be of opinions and hypotheses, and the other section of truths."*(14) To these four
sections, the four operations of the soul correspond,- conjecture, faith, understanding, reason. As every
pool reflects the image of the sun, so every thought and thing restores us an image and creature of the
supreme Good. The universe is perforated by a million channels for his activity. All things mount and
mount.
All his thought has this ascension; in Phaedrus, teaching that beauty is the most lovely of all things,
exciting hilarity and shedding desire and confidence through the universe wherever it enters, and it
enters in some degree into all things:- but that there is another, which is as much more beautiful than
beauty as beauty is than chaos; namely, wisdom, which our wonderful organ of sight cannot reach
unto, but which, could it be seen, would ravish us with its perfect reality. He has the same regard to it
as the source of excellence in works of art. When an artificer, he says, in the fabrication of any work,
looks to that which always subsists according to the same; and, employing a model of this kind,
expresses its idea and power in his work,- it must follow that his production should be beautiful. But
when he beholds that which is born and dies, it will be far from beautiful.
Thus ever: the Banquet is a teaching in the same spirit, familiar now to all the poetry and to all the
sermons of the world, that the love of the sexes is initial, and symbolizes at a distance the passion of
the soul for that immense lake of beauty it exists to seek. This faith in the Divinity is never out of mind,
and constitutes the ground of all his dogmas. Body cannot teach wisdom;- God only. In the same mind
he constantly affirms that virtue cannot be taught; that it is not a science, but an inspiration; that the
greatest goods are produced to us through mania and are assigned to us by a divine gift.
This leads me to that central figure which he has established in his Academy as the organ through
which every considered opinion shall be announced, and whose biography he has likewise so labored
that the historic facts are lost in the light of Plato's mind. Socrates and Plato are the double star which
the most powerful instruments will not entirely separate. Socrates again, in his traits and genius, is the
best example of that synthesis which constitutes Plato's extraordinary power. Socrates, a man of
humble stem, but honest enough; of the commonest history; of a personal homeliness so remarkable
as to be a cause of wit in others:- the rather that his broad good nature and exquisite taste for a joke
invited the sally, which was sure to be paid. The players personated him on the stage; the potters
copied his ugly face on their stone jugs. He was a cool fellow, adding to his humor a perfect temper and
a knowledge of his man, be he who he might whom he talked with, which laid the companion open to
certain defeat in any debate,- and in debate he immoderately delighted. The young men are
prodigiously fond of him and invite him to their feasts, whither he goes for conversation. He can drink,
too; has the strongest head in Athens; and after leaving the whole party under the table, goes away as if
nothing had happened, to begin new dialogues with somebody that is sober. In short, he was what our
country-people call an old one.
He affected a good many citizen-like tastes, was monstrously fond of Athens, hated trees, never
willingly went beyond the walls, knew the old characters, valued the bores and philistines, thought
every thing in Athens a little better than anything in any other place. He was plain as a Quaker in habit
and speech, affected low phrases, and illustrations from cocks and quails, soup-pans and sycamore-
spoons, grooms and farriers, and unnamable offices,- especially if he talked with any superfine person.
He had a Franklin-like wisdom. Thus he showed one who was afraid to go on foot to Olympia, that it
was no more than his daily walk within doors, if continuously extended, would easily reach.
Plain old uncle as he was, with his great ears, an immense talker,- the rumor ran that on one or two
occasions, in the war with Boeotia, he had shown a determination which had covered the retreat of a
troop; and there was some story that under cover of folly, he had, in the city government, when one
day he chanced to hold a seat there, evinced a courage in opposing singly the popular voice, which had
well-nigh ruined him. He is very poor; but then he is hardy as a soldier, and can live on a few olives;
usually, in the strictest sense, on bread and water, except when entertained by his friends. His
necessary expenses were exceedingly small, and no one could live as he did. He wore no under
garment; his upper garment was the same for summer and winter, and he went barefooted; and it is
said that to procure the pleasure, which he loves, of talking at his ease all day with the most elegant
and cultivated young men, he will now and then return to his shop and carve statues, good or bad, for
sale. However that be, it is certain that he had grown to delight in nothing else than this conversation;
and that, under his hypocritical pretence of knowing nothing, he attacks and brings down all the fine
speakers, all the fine philosophers of Athens, whether natives or strangers from Asia Minor and the
islands. Nobody can refuse to talk with him, he is so honest and really curious to know; a man who was
willingly confuted if he did not speak the truth, and who willingly confuted others asserting what was
false; and not less pleased when confuted than when confuting; for he thought not any evil happened
to men of such a magnitude as false opinion respecting the just and unjust. A pitiless disputant, who
knows nothing, but the bounds of whose conquering intelligence no man had ever reached; whose
temper was imperturbable; whose dreadful logic was always leisurely and sportive; so careless and
ignorant as to disarm the wariest and draw them, in the pleasantest manner, into horrible doubts and
confusion. But he always knew the way out; knew it, yet would not tell it. No escape; he drives them to
terrible choices by his dilemmas, and tosses the Hippiases and Gorgiases with their grand reputations,
as a boy tosses his balls. The tyrannous realist!- Meno has discoursed a thousand times, at length, on
virtue, before many companies, and very well, as it appeared to him; but at this moment he cannot
even tell what it is,- this cramp-fish of a Socrates has so bewitched him.
This hard-headed humorist, whose strange conceits, drollery and bonhommie diverted the young
patricians, whilst the rumor of his sayings and quibbles gets abroad every day,- turns out, in the
sequel, to have a probity as invincible as his logic, and to be either insane, or at least, under cover of
this play, enthusiastic in his religion. When accused before the judges of subverting the popular creed,
he affirms the immortality of the soul, the future reward and punishment; and refusing to recant, in a
caprice of the popular government was condemned to die, and sent to the prison. Socrates entered the
prison and took away all ignominy from the place, which could not be a prison whilst he was there.
Crito bribed the jailer; but Socrates would not go out by treachery. "Whatever inconvenience ensue,
nothing is to be preferred before justice. These things I hear like pipes and drums, whose sound makes
me deaf to every thing you say." The fame of this prison, the fame of the discourses there and the
drinking of the hemlock are one of the most precious passages in the history of the world.
The rare coincidence, in one ugly body, of the droll and the martyr, the keen street and market
debater with the sweetest saint known to any history at that time, had forcibly struck the mind of
Plato, so capacious of these contrasts; and the figure of Socrates by a necessity placed itself in the
foreground of the scene, as the fittest dispenser of the intellectual treasures he had to communicate. It
was a rare fortune that this Aesop of the mob and this robed scholar should meet, to make each other
immortal in their mutual faculty. The strange synthesis in the character of Socrates capped the
synthesis in the mind of Plato. Moreover by this means he was able, in the direct way and without envy
to avail himself of the wit and weight of Socrates, to which unquestionably his own debt was great; and
these derived again their principal advantage from the perfect art of Plato.
It remains to say that the defect of Plato in power is only that which results inevitably from his
quality. He is intellectual in his aim; and therefore, in expression, literary. Mounting into heaven,
diving into the pit, expounding the laws of the state, the passion of love, the remorse of crime, the hope
of the parting soul,- he is literary, and never otherwise. It is almost the sole deduction from the merit
of Plato that his writings have not,- what is no doubt incident to this regnancy of intellect in his work,-
the vital authority which the screams of prophets and the sermons of unlettered Arabs and Jews
possess. There is an interval; and to cohesion, contact is necessary.
I know not what can be said in reply to this criticism but that we have come to a fact in the nature
of things: an oak is not an orange. The qualities of sugar remain with sugar, and those of salt with salt.
In the second place, he has not a system. The dearest defenders and disciples are at fault. He
attempted a theory of the universe, and his theory is not complete or self-evident. One man thinks he
means this, and another that; he has said one thing in one place, and the reverse of it in another place.
He is charged with having failed to make the transition from ideas to matter. Here is the world, sound
as a nut, perfect, not the smallest piece of chaos left, never a stitch nor an end, not a mark of haste, or
botching, or second thought; but the theory of the world is a thing of shreds and patches.
The longest wave is quickly lost in the sea. Plato would willingly have a Platonism, a known and
accurate expression for the world, and it should be accurate. It shall be the world passed through the
mind of Plato,- nothing less. Every atom shall have the Platonic tinge; every atom, every relation or
quality you knew before, you shall know again and find here, but now ordered; not nature, but art. And
you shall feel that Alexander indeed overran, with men and horses, some countries of the planet; but
countries, and things of which countries are made, elements, planet itself, laws of planet and of men,
have passed through this man as bread into his body, and become no longer bread, but body: so all this
mammoth morsel has become Plato. He has clapped copyright on the world. This is the ambition of
individualism. But the mouthful proves too large. Boa constrictor has good will to eat it, but he is
foiled. He falls abroad in the attempt; and biting, gets strangled: the bitten world holds the biter fast by
his own teeth. There he perishes: unconquered nature lives on and forgets him. So it fares with all: so
must it fare with Plato. In view of eternal nature, Plato turns out to be philosophical exercitations. He
argues on this side and on that. The acutest German, the lovingest disciple, could never tell what
Platonism was; indeed, admirable texts can be quoted on both sides of every great question from
him.*(15)
These things we are forced to say if we must consider the effort of Plato or of any philosopher to
dispose of nature,- which will not be disposed of. No power of genius has ever yet had the smallest
success in explaining existence. The perfect enigma remains. But there is an injustice in assuming this
ambition for Plato. Let us not seem to treat with flippancy his venerable name. Men, in proportion to
their intellect, have admitted his transcendent claims. The way to know him is to compare him, not
with nature, but with other men. How many ages have gone by, and he remains unapproached! A chief
structure of human wit, like Karnac, or the medieval cathedrals, or the Etrurian remains, it requires all
the breath of human faculty to know it. I think it is trueliest seen when seen with the most respect. His
sense deepens, his merits multiply, with study. When we say, Here is a fine collection of fables; or
when we praise the style, or the common sense, or arithmetic, we speak as boys, and much of our
impatient criticism of the dialectic, I suspect, is no better.
The criticism is like our impatience of miles, when we are in a hurry; but it is still best that a mile
should have seventeen hundred and sixty yards. The great-eyed Plato proportioned the lights and
shades after the genius of our life.
Does the world need another collection of Emerson's essays? Especially when many of them
already reside on the Web?
The answer is a resounding "Yes!" if the collection is David Robinson's 2003
collection, issued just in time for the Emerson bicentennial, The Spiritual Emerson.
Why does this book belong on your bookshelf? First, because despite the
widespread availability of Emerson's materials on the Web, there's still something to
reading Emerson the old-fashioned way -- holding a book in your hand, perhaps
underlining passages and making margin notes about your own reactions to what
Emerson is saying. (And I say this, speaking as someone who has helped to keep
many of Emerson's works available in searchable format on the Web at
http://www.emersoncentral.com.)
But why this collection? David M. Robinson, an Emerson scholar at Oregon State University, has
introduced the book with an excellent overview of Emerson's work and importance, both to American
literature and to American cultural thought. And he has chosen a selection of essays -- some better
known than others -- that tries to communicate who Emerson was and what he was trying to
accomplish, over his lifetime of thinking, speaking and writing.
Most people who have read Emerson at all, have read Emerson's Self-Reliance, and sometimes
Nature. Yet, as Robinson points out in the introduction and in making the selections he's included,
this was all "early Emerson" -- the thought that broke with tradition, yes, and thought that served as an
underpinning for much of what Emerson later espoused. But it was thought before that later
evolution.
So Robinson has included much of Emerson's later ideas, to give a sense not just of how Emerson
evolved, but the Emersonian ideas that many Americans of the 19th century would have actually heard
when Emerson spoke on the lecture circuit.
Robinson reminds us, both in the introduction and with his selection, that Emerson was known to
his contemporaries through his speaking tours and books, and not just through his early essays. Thus,
the Emerson who had such a profound effect on American culture, religion and literature, was not
simply the Emerson of Self-Reliance and Nature.
Emerson's attitudes towards and relationship with practical ethical morality and social reform
comes through in this collection, in their complexity and evolution. When Emerson called for a
"religion of pure ethics," and many in the late 19th century went looking for or tried to create such a
religion, it was this thread of Emersonian thought, often neglected in Emerson studies, that they were
responding to.
Robinson also does a great service to understanding this aspect of Emerson's spiritual quest by
showing us the essays in his early work that hint more at this later emphasis. Thus, Robinson includes
the not-so-well-known essay "Circles," originally published in the same volume as "Self-Reliance,"
which hints at the later moral emphasis.
Even the end of "Self-Reliance" addresses the issue of one's individual moral sense resonating with
the universal morality. Emerson has often been accused of promoting or even introducing moral
relativism, but this is, as these essays demonstrate thoroughly, a misunderstanding of Emerson.
Emerson taught that individuals should rely on their sense of truth and right -- but also that such an
individual truth and right were dependable precisely because they would resonate not with social
convention but with the universal law, with the spiritual law that is at the core of the universe itself.
Robinson's Spiritual Emerson, which may end up challenging your very idea of what "spiritual"
means, doesn't belong on your bookshelf -- it belongs in your hands, on your bedside table, in your
bookbag, anywhere where you'll take it up and ponder it, as you examine your own spiritual and moral
assumptions and ideas along with Emerson's.
- Jone Johnson Lewis
The Spiritual Emerson: Essential Writings
Ralph Waldo Emerson, edited by and with an introduction by David M. Robinson
Beacon Press, 2003
I
POEMS
GOOD-BYE
GOOD-BYE, proud world! I'm going home:
Thou art not my friend, and I'm not thine.
Long through thy weary crowds I roam;
A river-ark on the ocean brine,
Long I've been tossed like the driven foam;
But now, proud world! I'm going home.
THE PROBLEM
I LIKE a church; I like a cowl;
I love a prophet of the soul;
And on my heart monastic aisles
Fall like sweet strains, or pensive smiles;
Yet not for all his faith can see
Would I that cowled churchman be.
TO RHEA
THEE, dear friend, a brother soothes,
Not with flatteries, but truths,
Which tarnish not, but purify
To light which dims the morning's eye.
I have come from the spring-woods,
From the fragrant solitudes;--
Listen what the poplar-tree
And murmuring waters counselled me.
THE VISIT
ASKEST, 'How long thou shalt stay?'
Devastator of the day!
Know, each substance and relation,
Thorough nature's operation,
Hath its unit, bound and metre;
And every new compound
Is some product and repeater,--
Product of the earlier found.
But the unit of the visit,
The encounter of the wise,--
Say, what other metre is it
Than the meeting of the eyes?
Nature poureth into nature
Through the channels of that feature,
Riding on the ray of sight,
Fleeter far than whirlwinds go,
Or for service, or delight,
Hearts to hearts their meaning show,
Sum their long experience,
And import intelligence.
Single look has drained the breast;
Single moment years confessed.
The duration of a glance
Is the term of covenance,
And, though thy rede be church or state,
Frugal multiples of that.
Speeding Saturn cannot halt;
Linger,--thou shalt rue the fault:
If Love his moment overstay,
Hatred's swift repulsions play.
URIEL
IT fell in the ancient periods
Which the brooding soul surveys,
Or ever the wild Time coined itself
Into calendar months and days.
THE WORLD-SOUL
THANKS to the morning light,
Thanks to the foaming sea,
To the uplands of New Hampshire,
To the green-haired forest free;
Thanks to each man of courage,
To the maids of holy mind,
To the boy with his games undaunted
Who never looks behind?
THE SPHINX
THE Sphinx is drowsy,
Her wings are furled:
Her ear is heavy,
She broods on the world.
"Who'll tell me my secret,
The ages have kept?--
I awaited the seer
While they slumbered and slept:--
"Erect as a sunbeam,
Upspringeth the palm;
The elephant browses,
Undaunted and calm;
In beautiful motion
The thrush plies his wings;
Kind leaves of his covert,
Your silence he sings.
"Eterne alternation
Now follows, now flies;
And under pain, pleasure,--
Under pleasure, pain lies.
Love works at the centre,
Heart-heaving alway;
Forth speed the strong pulses
To the borders of day.
ALPHONSO OF CASTILE
I, ALPHONSO, live and learn,
Seeing Nature go astern.
Things deteriorate in kind;
Lemons run to leaves and rind;
Meagre crop of figs and limes;
Shorter days and harder times.
Flowering April cools and dies
In the insufficient skies.
Imps, at high midsummer, blot
Half the sun's disk with a spot;
'T will not now avail to tan
Orange cheek or skin of man.
Roses bleach, the goats are dry,
Lisbon quakes, the people cry.
Yon pale, scrawny fisher fools,
Gaunt as bitterns in the pools,
Are no brothers of my blood;--
They discredit Adamhood.
Eyes of gods! ye must have seen,
O'er your ramparts as ye lean,
The general debility;
Of genius the sterility;
Mighty projects countermanded;
Rash ambition, brokenhanded;
Puny man and scentless rose
Tormenting Pan to double the dose.
Rebuild or ruin: either fill
Of vital force the wasted rill,
Or tumble all again in heap
To weltering Chaos and to sleep.
MITHRIDATES
I CANNOT spare water or wine,
Tobacco-leaf, or poppy, or rose;
From the earth-poles to the Line,
All between that works or grows,
Every thing is kin of mine.
TO J. W.
SET not thy foot on graves;
Hear what wine and roses say;
The mountain chase, the summer waves,
The crowded town, thy feet may well delay.
Set not thy foot on graves;
Nor seek to unwind the shroud
Which charitable Time
And Nature have allowed
To wrap the errors of a sage sublime.
DESTINY
THAT you are fair or wise is vain,
Or strong, or rich, or generous;
You must add the untaught strain
That sheds beauty on the rose.
There's a melody born of melody,
Which melts the World into a sea.
Toil could never compass it;
Art its height could never hit;
It came never out of wit;
But a music music-born
Well may Jove and Juno scorn.
Thy beauty, if it lack the fire
Which drives me mad with sweet desire,
What boots it? What the soldier's mail,
Unless he conquer and prevail?
What all the goods thy pride which lift,
If thou pine for another's gift?
Alas! that one is born in blight,
Victim of perpetual slight:
When thou lookest on his face,
Thy heart saith,'Brother, go thy ways!
None shall ask thee what thou doest,
Or care a rush for what thou knowest,
Or listen when thou repliest,
Or remember where thou liest,
Or how thy supper is sodden;'
And another is born
To make the sun forgotten.
Surely he carries a talisman
Under his tongue;
Broad his shoulders are and strong;
And his eye is scornful,
Threatening and young.
I hold it of little matter
Whether your jewel be of pure water,
A rose diamond or a white,
But whether it dazzle me with light.
I care not how you are dressed,
In coarsest weeds or in the best;
Nor whether your name is base or brave:
Nor for the fashion of your behavior;
But whether you charm me,
Bid my bread feed and my fire warm me
And dress up Nature in your favor.
One thing is forever good;
That one thing is Success,--
Dear to the Eumenides,
And to all the heavenly brood.
Who bides at home, nor looks abroad,
Carries the eagles, and masters the sword.
GUY
MORTAL mixed of middle clay,
Attempered to the night and day,
Interchangeable with things,
Needs no amulets nor rings.
Guy possessed the talisman
That all things from him began;
And as, of old, Polycrates
Chained the sunshine and the breeze,
So did Guy betimes discover
Fortune was his guard and lover;
In strange junctures, felt, with awe,
His own symmetry with law;
That no mixture could withstand
The virtue of his lucky hand.
He gold or jewel could not lose,
Nor not receive his ample dues.
Fearless Guy had never foes,
He did their weapons decompose.
Aimed at him, the blushing blade
Healed as fast the wounds it made.
If on the foeman fell his gaze,
Him it would straightway blind or craze,
In the street, if he turned round,
His eye the eye' t was seeking found.
It seemed his Genius discreet
Worked on the Maker's own receipt,
And made each tide and element
Stewards of stipend and of rent;
So that the common waters fell
As costly wine into his well.
He had so sped his wise affairs
That he caught Nature in his snares.
Early or late, the falling rain
Arrived in time to swell his grain;
Stream could not so perversely wind
But corn of Guy's was there to grind:
The siroc found it on its way,
To speed his sails, to dry his hay;
And the world's sun seemed to rise
To drudge all day for Guy the wise.
In his rich nurseries, timely skill
Strong crab with nobler blood did fill;
The zephyr in his garden rolled
From plum-trees vegetable gold;
And all the hours of the year
With their own harvest honored were.
There was no frost but welcome came,
Nor freshet, nor midsummer flame.
Belonged to wind and world the toil
And venture, and to Guy the oil.
HAMATREYA
BULKELEY, Hunt, Willard, Hosmer, Meriam, Flint,
Possessed the land which rendered to their toil
Hay, corn, roots, hemp, flax, apples, wool and wood.
Each of these landlords walked amidst his farm,
Saying,''T is mine, my children's and my name's.
How sweet the west wind sounds in my own trees!
How graceful climb those shadows on my hill!
I fancy these pure waters and the flags
Know me, as does my dog: we sympathize;
And, I affirm, my actions smack of the soil.'
EARTH-SONG
' Mine and yours;
Mine, not yours.
Earth endures;
Stars abide--
Shine down in the old sea;
Old are the shores;
But where are old men?
I who have seen much,
Such have I never seen.
THE RHODORA:
ON BEING ASKED, WHENCE IS THE FLOWER?
IN May, when sea-winds pierced our solitudes,
I found the fresh Rhodora in the woods,
Spreading its leafless blooms in a damp nook,
To please the desert and the sluggish brook.
The purple petals, fallen in the pool,
Made the black water with their beauty gay;
Here might the red-bird come his plumes to cool,
And court the flower that cheapens his array.
Rhodora! if the sages ask thee why
This charm is wasted on the earth and sky,
Tell them, dear, that if eyes were made for seeing,
Then Beauty is its own excuse for being:
Why thou wert there, O rival of the rose!
I never thought to ask, I never knew:
But, in my simple ignorance, suppose
The self-same Power that brought me there brought you.
THE HUMBLE-BEE
BURLY, dozing humble-bee,
Where thou art is clime for me.
Let them sail for Porto Rique,
Far-off heats through seas to seek;
I will follow thee alone,
Thou animated torrid-zone!
Zigzag steerer, desert cheerer,
Let me chase thy waving lines;
Keep me nearer, me thy hearer,
Singing over shrubs and vines.
Insect lover of the sun,
Joy of thy dominion!
Sailor of the atmosphere;
Swimmer through the waves of air;
Voyager of light and noon;
Epicurean of June;
Wait, I prithee, till I come
Within earshot of thy hum,--
All without is martyrdom.
THE SNOW-STORM
ANNOUNCED by all the trumpets of the sky,
Arrives the snow, and, driving o'er the fields,
Seems nowhere to alight: the whited air
Hides hills and woods, the river, and the heaven,
And veils the farm-house at the garden's end.
The sled and traveller stopped, the courier's feet
Delayed, all friends shut out, the housemates sit
Around the radiant fireplace, enclosed
In a tumultuous privacy of storm.
WOODNOTES
I
1
WHEN the pine tosses its cones
To the song of its waterfall tones,
Who speeds to the woodland walks?
To birds and trees who talks?
Cæsar of his leafy Rome,
There the poet is at home.
He goes to the river-side,--
Not hook nor line hath he;
He stands in the meadows wide,--
Nor gun nor scythe to see.
Sure some god his eye enchants:
What he knows nobody wants.
In the wood he travels glad,
Without better fortune had,
Melancholy without bad.
Knowledge this man prizes best
Seems fantastic to the rest:
Pondering shadows, colors, clouds,
Grass-buds and caterpillar-shrouds,
Boughs on which the wild bees settle,
Tints that spot the violet's petal,
Why Nature loves the number five,
And why the star-form she repeats:
Lover of all things alive,
Wonderer at all he meets,
Wonderer chiefly at himself,
Who can tell him what he is?
Or how meet in human elf
Coming and past eternities?
2
And such I knew, a forest seer,
A minstrel of the natural year,
Foreteller of the vernal ides,
Wise harbinger of spheres and tides,
A lover true, who knew by heart
Each joy the mountain dales impart;
It seemed that Nature could not raise
A plant in any secret place,
In quaking bog, on snowy hill,
Beneath the grass that shades the rill,
Under the snow, between the rocks,
In damp fields known to bird and fox.
But he would come in the very hour
It opened in its virgin bower,
As if a sunbeam showed the place,
And tell its long-descended race.
It seemed as if the breezes brought him,
It seemed as if the sparrows taught him;
As if by secret sight he knew
Where, in far fields, the orchis grew.
Many haps fall in the field
Seldom seen by wishful eyes,
But all her shows did Nature yield,
To please and win this pilgrim wise.
He saw the partridge drum in the woods;
He heard the woodcock's evening hymn;
He found the tawny thrushes' broods;
And the shy hawk did wait for him;
What others did at distance hear,
And guessed within the thicket's gloom,
Was shown to this philosopher,
And at his bidding seemed to come.
3
In unploughed Maine he sought the lumberers' gang
Where from a hundred lakes young rivers sprang;
He trode the unplanted forest floor, whereon
The all-seeing sun for ages hath not shone;
Where feeds the moose, and walks the surly bear,
And up the tall mast runs the woodpecker.
He saw beneath dim aisles, in odorous beds,
The slight Linnæa hang its twin-born heads,
And blessed the monument of the man of flowers,
Which breathes his sweet fame'through the northern bowers.
He heard, when in the grove, at intervals,
With sudden roar the aged pine-tree fallS,--
One crash, the death-hymn of the perfect tree,
Declares the close of its green century.
Low lies the plant to whose creation went
Sweet influence from every element;
Whose living towers the years conspired to build,
Whose giddy top the morning loved to gild.
Through these green tents, by eldest Nature dressed,
He roamed, content alike with man and beast.
Where darkness found him he lay glad at night;
There the red morning touched him with its light.
Three moons his great heart him a hermit made,
So long he roved at will the boundless shade.
The timid it concerns to ask their way,
And fear what foe in caves and swamps can stray,
To make no step until the event is known,
And ills to come as evils past bemoan.
Not so the wise; no coward watch he keeps
To spy what danger on his pathway creeps;
Go where he will, the wise man is at home,
His hearth the earth,--his hall the azure dome;
Where his clear spirit leads him, there's his road
By God's own light illumined and foreshowed.
4
'T was one of the charmèd days
When the genius of God doth flow;
The wind may alter twenty ways,
A tempest cannot blow;
It may blow north, it still is warm;
Or south, it still is clear;
Or east, it smells like a clover-farm;
Or west, no thunder fear.
The musing peasant, lowly great,
Beside the forest water sate;
The rope-like pine-roots crosswise grown
Composed the network of his throne;
The wide lake, edged with sand and grass,
Was burnished to a floor of glass,
Painted with shadows green and proud
Of the tree and of the cloud.
He was the heart of all the scene;
On him the sun looked more serene;
To hill and cloud his face was known,--
It seemed the likeness of their own;
They knew by secret sympathy
The public child of earth and sky.
'You ask,' he said,'what guide
Me through trackless thickets led,
Through thick-stemmed woodlands rough and wide.
I found the water's bed.
The watercourses were my guide;
I travelled grateful by their side,
Or through their channel dry;
They led me through the thicket damp,
Through brake and fern, the beavers' camp,
Through beds of granite cut my road,
And their resistless friendship showed.
The falling waters led me,
The foodful waters fed me,
And brought me to the lowest land
Unerring to the ocean sand.
The moss upon the forest bark
Was pole-star when the night was dark;
The purple berries in the wood
Supplied me necessary food;
For Nature ever faithful is
To such as trust her faithfulness.
When the forest shall mislead me,
When the night and morning lie,
When sea and land refuse to feed me,
'T will be time enough to die;
Then will yet my mother yield
A pillow in her greenest field,
Nor the June flowers scorn to cover
The clay of their departed lover.'
WOODNOTES
II
As sunbeams stream through liberal space
And nothing jostle or displace,
So waved the pine-tree through my thought
And fanned the dreams it never brought.
MONADNOC
THOUSAND minstrels woke within me,
'Our music's in the hills;'--
Gayest pictures rose to win me,
Leopard-colored rills.
Up!--If thou knew'st who calls
To twilight parks of beech and pine,
High over the river intervals,
Above the ploughman's highest line,
Over the owner's farthest walls!
Up! where the airy citadel
O'erlooks the surging landscape's swell!
Let not unto the stones the Day
Her lily and rose, her sea and land display.
Read the celestial sign!
Lo! the south answers to the north;
Bookworm, break this sloth urbane;
A greater spirit bids thee forth
Than the gray dreams which thee detain.
Mark how the climbing Oreads
Beckon thee to their arcades;
Youth, for a moment free as they,
Teach thy feet to feel the ground,
Ere yet arrives the wintry day
When Time thy feet has bound.
Take the bounty of thy birth,
Taste the lordship of the earth.'
Hither we bring
Our insect miseries to thy rocks;
And the whole flight, with folded wing,
Vanish, and end their murmuring,--
Vanish beside these dedicated blocks,
Which who can tell what mason laid?
Spoils of a front none need restore,
Replacing frieze and architrave;--
Where flowers each stone rosette and metope brave;
Still is the haughty pile erect
Of the old building Intellect.
FABLE
THE mountain and the squirrel
Had a quarrel,
And the former called the latter'Little Prig;'
Bun replied,
'You are doubtless very big;
But all sorts of things and weather
Must be taken in together,
To make up a year
And a sphere.
And I think it no disgrace
To occupy my place.
If I'm not so large as you,
You are not so small as I,
And not half so spry.
I'll not deny you make
A very pretty squirrel track;
Talents differ; all is well and wisely put;
If I cannot carry forests on my back,
Neither can you crack a nut.'
ODE
INSCRIBED TO W. H. CHANNING
If I refuse
My study for their politique,
Which at the best is trick,
The angry Muse
Puts confusion in my brain.
ASTRÆA
EACH the herald is who wrote
His rank, and quartered his own coat.
There is no king nor sovereign state
That can fix a hero's rate;
Each to all is venerable,
Cap-a-pie invulnerable,
Until he write, where all eyes rest,
Slave or master on his breast.
I saw men go up and down,
In the country and the town,
With this tablet on their neck,
Judgment and a judge we seek.'
Not to monarchs they repair,
Nor to learned jurist's chair;
But they hurry to their peers,
To their kinsfolk and their dears;
Louder than with speech they pray,--
What am I? companion, say.'
And the friend not hesitates
To assign just place and mates;
Answers not in word or letter,
Yet is understood the better;
Each to each a looking-glass,
Reflects his figure that cloth pass.
ETIENNE DE LA BOECE
I SERVE you not, if you I follow,
Shadowlike, o'er hill and hollow;
And bend my fancy to your leading,
All too nimble for my treading.
When the pilgrimage is done,
And we're the landscape overrun,
I am bitter, vacant, thwarted,
And your heart is unsupported.
Vainly valiant, you have missed
The manhood that should yours resist,--
Its complement; but if I could,
In severe or cordial mood,
Lead you rightly to my altar,
Where the wisest Muses falter,
And worship that world-warming spark
Which dazzles me in midnight dark,
Equalizing small and large,
While the soul it doth surcharge,
Till the poor is wealthy grown,
And the hermit never alone,--
The traveller and the road seem one
With the errand to be done,--
That were a man's and lover's part,
That were Freedom's whitest chart.
COMPENSATION
WHY should I keep holiday
When other men have none?
Why but because, when these are gay,
I sit and mourn alone?
FORBEARANCE
HAST thou named all the birds without a gun?
Loved the wood-rose, and left it on its stalk?
At rich men's tables eaten bread and pulse?
Unarmed, faced danger with a heart of trust?
And loved so well a high behavior,
In man or maid, that thou from speech refrained,
Nobility more nobly to repay?
O, be my friend, and teach me to be thine!
THE PARK
THE prosperous and beautiful
To me seem not to wear
The yoke of conscience masterful,
Which galls me everywhere.
Enchanters! Enchantresses!
Your gold makes you seem wise;
The morning mist within your grounds
More proudly rolls, more softly lies.
FORERUNNERS
LONG I followed happy guides,
I could never reach their sides;
Their step is forth, and, ere the day
Breaks up their leaguer, and away.
Keen my sense, my heart was young,
Right good-will my sinews strung,
But no speed of mine avails
To hunt upon their shining trails.
On and away, their hasting feet
Make the morning proud and sweet;
Flowers they strew,--I catch the scent;
Or tone of silver instrument
Leaves on the wind melodious trace;
Yet I could never see their face.
On eastern hills I see their smokes,
Mixed with mist by distant lochs.
I met many travellers
Who the road had surely kept;
They saw not my fine revellers,--
These had crossed them while they slept.
Some had heard their fair report,
In the country or the court.
Fleetest couriers alive
Never yet could once arrive,
SURSUM CORDA
SEEK not the spirit, if it hide
Inexorable to thy zeal:
Trembler, do not whine and chide:
Art thou not also real?
Stoop not then to poor excuse;
Turn on the accuser roundly; say,
'Here am I, here will I abide
Forever to myself soothfast;
Go thou, sweet Heaven, or at thy pleasure stay!'
Already Heaven with thee its lot has cast,
For only it can absolutely deal.
ODE TO BEAUTY
WHO gave thee, O Beauty,
The keys of this breast,--
Too credulous lover
Of blest and unblest?
Say, when in lapsed ages
Thee knew I of old?
Or what was the service
For which I was sold?
When first my eyes saw thee,
I found me thy thrall,
By magical drawings,
Sweet tyrant of all!
I drank at thy fountain
False waters of thirst;
Thou intimate stranger,
Thou latest and first!
Thy dangerous glances
Make women of men;
New-born, we are melting
Into nature again.
TO ELLEN
AND Ellen, when the graybeard years
Have brought us to life's evening hour,
And all the crowded Past appears
A tiny scene of sun and shower,
Then, if I read the page aright
Where Hope, the soothsayer, reads our lot,
Thyself shalt own the page was bright,
Well that we loved, woe had we not.
TO EVA
O FAIR and stately maid, whose eyes
Were kindled in the upper skies
At the same torch that lighted mine;
For so I must interpret still
Thy sweet dominion o'er my will,
A sympathy divine.
LINES WRITTEN BY ELLEN LOUISA TUCKER SHORTLY BEFORE HER MARRIAGE TO MR. EMERSON
O then I awoke,
And I lived but to sigh,
Till a clear voice spoke,--
And my tears are dry.
THE VIOLET
BY ELLEN LOUISA TUCKER
Why wilt thou live when none around reflects thy pensive ray?
Thou bloomest here a lonely thing in the clear autumn day.
The tall green trees, that shelter thee, their last gay dress put on;
There will be nought to shelter thee when their sweet leaves are gone.
O Violet, like thee, how blest could I lie down and die,
When summer light is fading, and autumn breezes sigh;
When Winter reigned I'd close my eye, but wake with bursting Spring,
And live with living nature, a pure rejoicing thing.
THE AMULET
YOUR picture smiles as first it smiled;
The ring you gave is still the same;
Your letter tells, O changing child!
No tidings since it came.
Give me an amulet
That keeps intelligence with you,--
Red when you love, and rosier red,
And when you love not, pale and blue.
EROS
THE sense of the world is short,--
Long and various the report,--
To love and be beloved;
Men and gods have not outlearned it;
And, how oft soe'er they're turned it,
Not to be improved.
HERMIONE
ON a mound an Arab lay,
And sung his sweet regrets
And told his amulets:
The summer bird
His sorrow heard,
And, when he heaved a sigh profound,
The sympathetic swallow swept the ground.
'I am of a lineage
That each for each doth fast engage;
In old Bassora's schools, I seemed
Hermit vowed to books and gloom,--
Ill-bestead for gay bridegroom.
I was by thy touch redeemed;
When thy meteor glances came,
We talked at large of worldly fate,
And drew truly every trait.
Cupid is a casuist,
A mystic and a cabalist,--
Can your lurking thought surprise,
And interpret your device.
He is versed in occult science,
In magic and in clairvoyance,
Oft he keeps his fine ear strained,
And Reason on her tiptoe pained
For aëry intelligence,
And for strange coincidence.
But it touches his quick heart
When Fate by omens takes his part,
And chance-dropped hints from Nature's sphere
Deeply soothe his anxious ear.
He is wilful, mutable,
Shy, untamed, inscrutable,
Swifter-fashioned than the fairies,
Substance mixed of pure contraries;
His vice some elder virtue's token,
And his good is evil-spoken.
Failing sometimes of his own,
He is headstrong and alone;
He affects the wood and wild,
Like a flower-hunting child;
Buries himself in summer waves,
In trees, with beasts, in mines and caves,
Loves nature like a hornèd cow,
Bird, or deer, or caribou.
II
THE DÆMONIC LOVE
MAN was made of social earth,
Child and brother from his birth,
Tethered by a liquid cord
Of blood through veins of kindred poured.
Next his heart the fireside band
Of mother, father, sister; stand;
Names from awful childhood heard
Throbs of a wild religion stirred;--
Virtue, to love, to hate them, vice;
Till dangerous Beauty came, at last,
Till Beauty came to snap all ties;
The maid, abolishing the past,
With lotus wine obliterates
Dear memory's stone-incarved traits,
And, by herself, supplants alone
Friends year by year more inly known.
When her calm eyes opened bright,
All else grew foreign in their light.
It was ever the self-same tale,
The first experience will not fail;
Only two in the garden walked,
And with snake and seraph talked.
III
THE CELESTIAL LOVE
BUT God said,
'I will have a purer gift;
There is smoke in the flame;
New flowerets bring, new prayers uplift,
And love without a name.
Fond children, ye desire
To please each other well;
Another round, a higher,
Ye shall climb on the heavenly stair,
And selfish preference forbear;
And in right deserving,
And without a swerving
Each from your proper state,
Weave roses for your mate.
THE APOLOGY
THINK me not unkind and rude
That I walk alone in grove and glen;
I go to the god of the wood
To fetch his word to men.
MERLIN
THY trivial harp will never please
Or fill my craving ear;
Its chords should ring as blows the breeze,
Free, peremptory, clear.
No jingling serenader's art,
Nor tinkle of piano strings,
Can make the wild blood start
In its mystic springs.
The kingly bard
Must smite the chords rudely and hard,
As with hammer or with mace;
That they may render back
Artful thunder, which conveys
Secrets of the solar track,
Sparks of the supersolar blaze.
Merlin's blows are strokes of fate,
Chiming with the forest tone,
When boughs buffet boughs in the wood;
Chiming with the gasp and moan
Of the ice-imprisoned flood;
With the pulse of manly hearts;
With the voice of orators;
With the din of city arts;
With the cannonade of wars;
With the marches of the brave;
And prayers of might from martyrs' cave.
By Sybarites beguiled,
He shall no task decline;
Merlin's mighty line
Extremes of nature reconciled,--
Bereaved a tyrant of his will,
And made the lion mild.
Songs can the tempest still,
Scattered on the stormy air,
Mould the year to fair increase,
And bring in poetic peace.
II
THE rhyme of the poet
Modulates the king's affairs;
Balance-loving Nature
Made all things in pairs.
To every foot its antipode;
Each color with its counter glowed;
To every tone beat answering tones,
Higher or graver;
Flavor gladly blends with flavor;
Leaf answers leaf upon the bough;
And match the paired cotyledons.
Hands to hands, and feet to feet,
In one body grooms and brides;
Eldest rite, two married sides
In every mortal meet.
Light's far furnace shines,
Smelting balls and bars,
Forging double stars,
Glittering twins and trines.
The animals are sick with love,
Lovesick with rhyme;
Each with all propitious Time
Into chorus wove.
BACCHUS
BRING me wine, but wine which never grew
In the belly of the grape,
Or grew on vine whose tap-roots, reaching through
Under the Andes to the Cape,
Suffer no savor of the earth to scape.
MEROPS
WHAT care I, so they stand the same,--
Things of the heavenly mind,--
How long the power to give them name
Tarries yet behind?
THE HOUSE
THERE iS no architect
Can build as the Muse can;
She is skilful to select
Materials for her plan;
SAADI
TREES in groves,
Kine in droves,
In ocean sport the scaly herds,
Wedge-like cleave the air the birds,
To northern lakes fly wind-borne ducks,
Browse the mountain sheep in flocks,
Men consort in camp and town,
But the poet dwells alone.
God, who gave to him the lyre,
Of all mortals the desire,
For all breathing men's behoof,
Straitly charged him,'Sit aloof;'
Annexed a warning, poets say,
To the bright premium,--
Ever, when twain together play,
Shall the harp be dumb.
XENOPHANES
BY fate, not option, frugal Nature gave
One scent to hyson and to wall-flower,
One sound to pine-groves and to waterfalls,
One aspect to the desert and the lake.
It was her stern necessity: all things
Are of one pattern made; bird, beast and flower,
Song, picture, form, space, thought and character
Deceive us, seeming to be many things,
And are but one. Beheld far off, they part
As God and devil; bring them to the mind,
They dull its edge with their monotony.
To know one element, explore another,
And in the second reappears the first.
The specious panorama of a year
But multiplies the image of a day,--
A belt of mirrors round a taper's flame;
And universal Nature, through her vast
And crowded whole, an infinite paroquet,
Repeats one note.
BLIGHT
GIVE me truths;
For I am weary of the surfaces,
And die of inanition. If I knew
Only the herbs and simples of the wood,
Rue, cinquefoil, gill, vervain and agrimony,
Blue-vetch and trillium, hawkweed, sassafras,
Milkweeds and murky brakes, quaint pipes and sundew,
And rare and virtuous roots, which in these woods
Draw untold juices from the common earth,
Untold, unknown, and I could surely spell
Their fragrance, and their chemistry apply
By sweet affinities to human flesh,
Driving the foe and stablishing the friend,--
O, that were much, and I could be a part
Of the round day, related to the sun
And planted world, and full executor
Of their imperfect functions.
But these young scholars, who invade our hills,
Bold as the engineer who fells the wood,
And travelling often in the cut he makes,
Love not the flower they pluck, and know it not,
And all their botany is Latin names.
The old men studied magic in the flowers,
And human fortunes in astronomy,
And an omnipotence in chemistry,
Preferring things to names, for these were men,
Were unitarians of the united world,
And, wheresoever their clear eye-beams fell,
They caught the footsteps of the SAME. Our eyes
Are armed, but we are strangers to the stars,
And strangers to the mystic beast and bird,
And strangers to the plant and to the mine.
The injured elements say,'Not in us;'
And night and day, ocean and continent,
Fire, plant and mineral say,'Not in us;'
And haughtily return us stare for stare.
For we invade them impiously for gain;
We devastate them unreligiously,
And coldly ask their pottage, not their love.
Therefore they shove us from them, yield to us
Only what to our griping toil is due;
But the sweet affluence of love and song,
The rich results of the divine consents
Of man and earth, of world beloved and lover,
The nectar and ambrosia, are withheld;
And in the midst of spoils and slaves, we thieves
And pirates of the universe, shut out
Daily to a more thin and outward rind,
Turn pale and starve. Therefore, to our sick eyes,
The stunted trees look sick, the summer short,
Clouds shade the sun, which will not tan our hay,
And nothing thrives to reach its natural term;
And life, shorn of its venerable length,
Even at its greatest space is a defeat,
And dies in anger that it was a dupe;
And, in its highest noon and wantonness,
Is early frugal, like a beggar's child;
Even in the hot pursuit of the best aims
And prizes of ambition, checks its hand,
Like Alpine cataracts frozen as they leaped,
Chilled with a miserly comparison
Of the toy's purchase with the length of life.
MUSKETAQUID
BECAUSE I was content with these poor fields,
Low, open meads, slender and sluggish streams,
And found a home in haunts which others scorned,
The partial wood-gods overpaid my love,
And granted me the freedom of their state,
And in their secret senate have prevailed
With the dear, dangerous lords that rule our life,
Made moon and planets parties to their bond,
And through my rock-like, solitary wont
Shot million rays of thought and tenderness.
For me, in showers, in sweeping showers, the Spring
Visits the valley;--break away the clouds,--
I bathe in the morn's soft and silvered air,
And loiter willing by yon loitering stream.
Sparrows far off, and nearer, April's bird,
Blue-coated,--flying before from tree to tree,
Courageous sing a delicate overture
To lead the tardy concert of the year.
Onward and nearer rides the sun of May;
And wide around, the marriage of the plants
Is sweetly solemnized. Then flows amain
The surge of summer's beauty; dell and crag,
Hollow and lake, hillside and pine arcade,
Are touched with genius. Yonder ragged cliff
Has thousand faces in a thousand hours.
Beneath low hills, in the broad interval
Through which at will our Indian rivulet
Winds mindful still of sannup and of squaw,
Whose pipe and arrow oft the plough unburies,
Here in pine houses built of new-fallen trees,
Supplanters of the tribe, the farmers dwell.
Traveller, to thee, perchance, a tedious road,
Or, it may be, a picture; to these men,
The landscape is an armory of powers,
Which, one by one, they know to draw and use.
They harness beast, bird, insect, to their work;
They prove the virtues of each bed of rock,
And, like the chemist 'mid his loaded jars,
Draw from each stratum its adapted use
To drug their crops or weapon their arts withal.
They turn the frost upon their chemic heap,
They set the wind to winnow pulse and grain,
They thank the spring-flood for its fertile slime,
And, on cheap summit-levels of the snow,
Slide with the sledge to inaccessible woods
O'er meadows bottomless. So, year by year,
They fight the elements with elements
(That one would say, meadow and forest walked,
Transmuted in these men to rule their like),
And by the order in the field disclose
The order regnant in the yeoman's brain.
THRENODY
THE South-wind brings
Life, sunshine and desire,
And on every mount and meadow
Breathes aromatic fire;
But over the dead he has no power,
The lost, the lost, he cannot restore;
And, looking over the hills, I mourn
The darling who shall not return.
O child of paradise,
Boy who made dear his father's home,
In whose deep eyes
Men read the welfare of the times to come,
I am too much bereft.
The world dishonored thou hast left.
O truth's and nature's costly lie!
O trusted broken prophecy!
O richest fortune sourly crossed!
Born for the future, to the future lost!
CONCORD HYMN
SUNG AT THE COMPLETION OF THE BATTLE MONUMENT, JULY 4, 1837
BY the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April's breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood
And fired the shot heard round the world.
II
MAY-DAY AND OTHER PIECES
MAY-DAY
DAUGHTER of Heaven and Earth, coy Spring,
With sudden passion languishing,
Teaching barren moors to smile,
Painting pictures mile on mile,
Holds a cup with cowslip-wreaths,
Whence a smokeless incense breathes.
The air is full of whistlings bland;
What was that I heard
Out of the hazy land?
Harp of the wind, or song of bird,
Or vagrant booming of the air,
Voice of a meteor lost in day?
Such tidings of the starry sphere
Can this elastic air convey.
Or haply't was the cannonade
Of the pent and darkened lake,
Cooled by the pendent mountain's shade,
Whose deeps, till beams of noonday break,
Afflicted moan, and latest hold
Even into May the iceberg cold.
Was it a squirrel's pettish bark,
Or clarionet of jay? or hark
Where yon wedged line the Nestor leads,
Steering north with raucous cry
Through tracts and provinces of sky,
Every night alighting down
In new landscapes of romance,
Where darkling feed the clamorous clans
By lonely lakes to men unknown.
Come the tumult whence it will,
Voice of sport, or rush of wings,
It is a sound, it is a token
That the marble sleep is broken,
And a change has passed on things.
********************
--
THE ADIRONDACS
A JOURNAL
DEDICATED TO MY FELLOW TRAVELLERS IN AUGUST, 1858
In Adirondac lakes,
At morn or noon, the guide rows bareheaded:
Shoes, flannel shirt, and kersey trousers make
His brief toilette: at night, or in the rain,
He dons a surcoat which he doffs at morn:
A paddle in the right hand, or an oar,
And in the left, a gun, his needful arms.
By turns we praised the stature of our guides,
Their rival strength and suppleness, their skill
To row, to swim, to shoot, to build a camp,
To climb a lofty stem, clean without boughs
Full fifty feet, and bring the eaglet down:
Temper to face wolf, bear, or catamount,
And wit to trap or take him in his lair.
Sound, ruddy men, frolic and innocent,
In winter, lumberers; in summer, guides;
Their sinewy arms pull at the oar untired
Three times ten thousand strokes, from morn to eve.
BRAHMA
IF the red slayer think he slays,
Or if the slain think he is slain,
They know not well the subtle ways
I keep, and pass, and turn again.
NEMESIS
ALREADY blushes on thy cheek
The bosom thought which thou must speak;
The bird, how far it haply roam
By cloud or isle, is flying home;
The maiden fears, and fearing runs
Into the charmed snare she shuns;
And every man, in love or pride,
Of his fate is never wide.
FATE
DEEP in the man sits fast his fate
To mould his fortunes, mean or great:
Unknown to Cromwell as to me
Was Cromwell's measure or degree;
Unknown to him as to his horse,
If he than his groom be better or worse.
He works, plots, fights, in rude affairs,
With squires, lords, kings, his craft compares,
Till late he learned, through doubt and fear,
Broad England harbored not his peer:
Obeying time, the last to own
The Genius from its cloudy throne.
For the prevision is allied
Unto the thing so signified;
Or say, the foresight that awaits
Is the same Genius that creates.
FREEDOM
Once I wished I might rehearse
Freedom's pæen in my verse,
That the slave who caught the strain
Should throb until he snapped his chain.
But the Spirit said, 'Not so;
Speak it not, or speak it low;
Name not lightly to be said,
Gift too precious to be prayed,
Passion not to be expressed
But by heaving of the Breast:
Yet,--wouldst thou the mountain find
Where this deity is shrined,
Who gives to seas and sunset skies
Their unspent beauty of suprise,
And when it lists him, waken can
Brute or savage into man;
Or, if in thy heart he shine,
Blends the starry fates with thine,
Draws angels nigh to dwell with thee,
And makes thy thoughts archangels be;
Freedom's secret wilt thou know?--
unsel not with flesh and blood;
Loiter not for cloak or food;
Right thou feelest, rush to do.'
ODE
SUNG IN THE TOWN HALL, CONCORD, JULY 4, 1857
BOSTON HYMN
READ IN MUSIC HALL, JANUARY 1, 1863
VOLUNTARIES
I
Low and mournful be the strain,
Haughty thought be far from me;
Tones of penitence and pain,
Moanings of the tropic sea;
Low and tender in the cell
Where a captive sits in chains,
Crooning ditties treasured well
From his Afric's torrid plains.
Sole estate his sire bequeathed,--
Hapless sire to hapless son,--
Was the wailing song he breathed,
And his chain when life was done.
II
FREEDOM all winged expands,
Nor perches in a narrow place;
Her broad van seeks unplanted lands;
She loves a poor and virtuous race.
Clinging to a colder zone
Whose dark sky sheds the snowflake down,
The snowflake is her banner's star,
Her stripes the boreal streamers are.
Long she loved the Northman well;
Now the iron age is done,
She will not refuse to dwell
With the offspring of the Sun;
Foundling of the desert far,
Where palms plume, siroccos blaze,
He roves unhurt the burning ways
In climates of the summer star,
He has avenues to God
Hid from men of Northern brain,
Far beholding, without cloud,
What these with slowest steps attain,
If once the generous chief arrive
To lead him willing to be led,
For freedom he will strike and strive,
And drain his heart till he be dead.
III
IN an age of fops and toys,
Wanting wisdom, void of right,
Who shall nerve heroic boys
To hazard all in Freedom's fight,--
Break sharply off their jolly games,
Forsake their comrades gay
And quit proud homes and youthful dames
For famine, toil and fray?
Yet on the nimble air benign
Speed nimbler messages,
That waft the breath of grace divine
To hearts in sloth and ease.
So nigh is grandeur to our dust,
So near is God to man,
When Duty whispers low, Thou must,
The youth replies, I can.
IV
O, WELL for the fortunate soul
Which Music's wings infold,
Stealing away the memory
Of sorrows new and old!
Yet happier he whose inward sight,
Stayed on his subtile thought,
Shuts his sense on toys of time,
To vacant bosoms brought.
But best befriended of the God
He who, in evil times,
Warned by an inward voice,
Heeds not the darkness and the dread,
Biding by his rule and choice,
Feeling only the fiery thread
Leading over heroic ground,
Wailed with mortal terror round,
To the aim which him allures,
And the sweet heaven his deed secures.
Peril around, all else appalling,
Cannon in front and leaden rain
Him duty through the clarion calling
To the van called not in vain.
V
Blooms the laurel which belongs
To the valiant chief who fights;
I see the wreath, I hear the songs
Lauding the Eternal Rights,
Victors over daily wrongs:
Awful victors, they misguide
Whom they will destroy,
And their coming triumph hide
In our downfall, or our joy:
They reach no term, they never sleep,
In equal strength through space abide;
Though, feigning dwarfs, they crouch and creep,
The strong they slay, the swift outstride:
Fate's grass grows rank in valley clods,
And rankly on the castled steep,--
Speak it firmly, these are gods,
All are ghosts beside.
UNA
ROVING, roving, as it seems,
Una lights my clouded dreams;
Still for journeys she is dressed;
We wander far by east and west.
BOSTON
SICUT PATRIBUS, SIT DEUS NOBIS
RUBIES
THEY brought me rubies from the mine,
And held them to the sun;
I said, they are drops of frozen wine
From Eden's vats that run.
MERLIN'S SONG
I
Or Merlin wise I learned a song,--
Sing it low or sing it loud,
It is mightier than the strong,
And punishes the proud.
I sing it to the surging crowd,--
Good men it will calm and cheer,
Bad men it will chain and cage--
In the heart of the music peals a strain
Which only angels hear;
Whether it waken joy or rage
Hushed myriads hark in vain,
Yet they who hear it shed their age,
And take their youth again.
II
Hear what British Merlin sung,
Of keenest eye and truest tongue.
Say not, the chiefs who first arrive
Usurp the seats for which all strive;
THE TEST
(Musa loquitur.)
SOLUTION
I am the Muse who sung alway
By Jove, at dawn of the first day.
Star-crowned, sole-sitting, long I wrought
To fire the stagnant earth with thought:
HYMN
SUNG AT THE SECOND CHURCH, AT THE ORDINATION OF REV. CHANDLER ROBBINS
WE love the venerable house
Our fathers built to God;--
In heaven are kept their grateful vows,
Their dust endears the sod.
NATURE
I
WINTERS know
Easily to shed the snow,
And the untaught Spring is wise
In cowslips and anemonies.
Nature, hating art and pains,
Baulks and baffles plotting brains;
Casualty and Surprise
Are the apples of her eyes;
But she dearly loves the poor,
And, by marvel of her own,
Strikes the loud pretender down.
For Nature listens in the rose
And hearkens in the berry's bell
To help her friends, to plague her foes,
And like wise God she judges well.
Yet doth much her love excel
To the souls that never fell,
To swains that live in happiness
And do well because they please,
Who walk in ways that are unfamed,
And feats achieve before they're named.
II
SHE is gamesome and good,
But of mutable mood,--
No dreary repeater now and again,
She will be all things to all men.
She who is old, but nowise feeble,
Pours her power into the people,
Merry and manifold without bar,
Makes and moulds them what they are,
And what they call their city way
Is not their way, but hers,
And what they say they made to-day,
They learned of the oaks and firs.
She spawneth men as mallows fresh,
Hero and maiden, flesh of her flesh;
She drugs her water and her wheat
With the flavors she finds meet,
And gives them what to drink and eat;
And having thus their bread and growth,
They do her bidding, nothing loath.
What's most theirs is not their own,
But borrowed in atoms from iron and stone,
And in their vaunted works of Art
The master-stroke is still her part.
DAYS
DAUGHTERS of Time, the hypocritic Days,
Muffled and dumb like barefoot dervishes,
And marching single in an endless file,
Bring diadems and fagots in their hands.
To each they offer gifts after his will,
Bread, kingdoms, stars, and sky that holds them all.
I, in my pleached garden, watched the pomp,
Forgot my morning wishes, hastily
Took a few herbs and apples, and the Day
Turned and departed silent. I, too late,
Under her solemn fillet saw the scorn.
MY GARDEN
IF I could put my woods in song
And tell what's there enjoyed,
All men would to my gardens throng,
And leave the cities void.
THE TITMOUSE
YOU shall not be overbold
When you deal with arctic cold,
As late I found my lukewarm blood
Chilled wading in the snow-choked wood.
How should I fight? my foeman fine
Has million arms to one of mine:
East, west, for aid I looked in vain,
East, west, north, south, are his domain.
Miles off, three dangerous miles, is home;
Must borrow his winds who there would
come.
Up and away for life! be fleet!--
The frost-king ties my fumbling feet,
Sings in my ears, my hands are stones,
Curdles the blood to the marble bones,
Tugs at the heart-strings, numbs the sense,
And hems in life with narrowing fence.
Well, in this broad bed lie and sleep,--
The punctual stars will vigil keep,--
Embalmed by purifying cold;
The winds shall sing their dead-march old,
The snow is no ignoble shroud,
The moon thy mourner, and the cloud.
THE HARP
ONE musician is sure,
His wisdom will not fail,
He has not tasted wine impure,
Nor bent to passion frail.
Age cannot cloud his memory,
Nor grief untune his voice,
Ranging down the ruled scale
From tone of joy to inward wail,
Tempering the pitch of all
In his windy cave.
He all the fables knows,
And in their causes tells,--
Knows Nature's rarest moods,'
Ever on her secret broods.
The Muse of men is coy,
Oft courted will not come;
In palaces and market squares
Entreated, she is dumb;
But my minstrel knows and tells
The counsel of the gods,
Knows of Holy Book the spells,
Knows the law of Night and Day,
And the heart of girl and boy,
The tragic and the gay,
And what is writ on Table Round
Of Arthur and his peers;
What sea and land discoursing say
In sidereal years.
He renders all his lore
In numbers wild as dreams,
Modulating all extremes,--
What the spangled meadow saith
To the children who have faith;
Only to children children sing,
Only to youth will spring be spring.
Æolian harp,
How strangely wise thy strain!
Gay for youth, gay for youth,
(Sweet is art, but sweeter truth,)
In the hall at summer eve
Fate and Beauty skilled to weave.
From the eager opening strings
Rung loud and bold the song.
Who but loved the wind-harp's note?
How should not the poet doat
On its mystic tongue,
With its primeval memory,
Reporting what old minstrels told
Of Merlin locked the harp within,--
Merlin paying the pain of sin,
Pent in a dungeon made of air,--
And some attain his voice to hear,
Words of pain and cries of fear,
But pillowed all on melody,
As fits the griefs of bards to be.
And what if that all-echoing shell,
Which thus the buried Past can tell,
Should rive the Future, and reveal
What his dread folds would fain conceal?
It shares the secret of the earth,
And of the kinds that owe her birth.
Speaks not of self that mystic tone,
But of the Overgods alone:
It trembles to the cosmic breath,--
As it heareth, so it saith;
Obeying meek the primal Cause,
It is the tongue of mundane laws.
And this, at least, I dare affirm,
Since genius too has bound and term,
There is no bard in all the choir,
Not Homer's self, the poet sires
Wise Milton's odes of pensive pleasure,
Or Shakspeare, whom no mind can measure,
Nor Collins' verse of tender pain,
SEASHORE
I HEARD or seemed to hear the chiding Sea
Say, Pilgrim, why so late and slow to come?
Am I not always here, thy summer home?
Is not my voice thy music, morn and eve?
My breath thy healthful climate in the heats,
My touch thy antidote, my bay thy bath?
Was ever building like my terraces?
Was ever couch magnificent as mine?
Lie on the warm rock-ledges, and there learn
A little hut suffices like a town.
I make your sculptured architecture vain,
Vain beside mine. I drive my wedges home,
And carve the coastwise mountain into caves.
Lo! here is Rome and Nineveh and Thebes,
Karnak and Pyramid and Giant's Stairs
Half piled or prostrate; and my newest slab
Older than all thy race.
SONG OF NATURE
MINE are the night and morning,
The pits of air, the gulf of space,
The sportive sun, the gibbous moon,
The innumerable days.
TWO RIVERS
THY summer voice, Musketaquit,
Repeats the music of the rain;
But sweeter rivers pulsing flit
Through thee, as thou through Concord Plain.
WALDEINSAMKEIT
I DO not count the hours I spend
In wandering by the sea;
The forest is my loyal friend,
Like God it useth me.
TERMINUS
IT is time to be old,
To take in sail: --
The god of bounds,
Who sets to seas a shore,
Came to me in his fatal rounds,
And said: 'No more!
No farther shoot
Thy broad ambitious branches, and thy root.
Fancy departs: no more invent;
Contract thy firmament
To compass of a tent.
There's not enough for this and that,
Make thy option which of two;
Economize the failing river,
Not the less revere the Giver,
Leave the many and hold the few.
Timely wise accept the terms,
Soften the fall with wary foot;
A little while
Still plan and smile,
And,--fault of novel germs,--
Mature the unfallen fruit.
Curse, if thou wilt, thy sires,
Bad husbands of their fires,
Who, when they gave thee breath,
Failed to bequeath
The needful sinew stark as once,
The Baresark marrow to thy bones,
But left a legacy of ebbing veins,
Inconstant heat and nerveless reins,--
Amid the Muses, left thee deaf and dumb,
Amid the gladiators, halt and numb.'
APRIL
THE April winds are magical
And thrill our tuneful frames;
The garden walks are passional
To bachelors and dames.
The hedge is gemmed with diamonds,
The air with Cupids full,
The cobweb clues of Rosamond
Guide lovers to the pool.
Each dimple in the water,
Each leaf that shades the rock
Can cozen, pique and flatter,
Can parley and provoke.
Goodfellow, Puck and goblins,
Know more than any book.
Down with your doleful problems,
And court the sunny brook.
The south-winds are quick-witted,
The schools are sad and slow,
The masters quite omitted
The lore we care to know.
CUPIDO
THE solid, solid universe
Is pervious to Love;
With bandaged eyes he never errs,
Around, below, above.
His blinding light
He flingeth white
On God's and Satan's brood,
And reconciles
By mystic wiles
The evil and the good.
THE PAST
THE debt is paid,
The verdict said,
The Furies laid,
The plague is stayed.
All fortunes made;
Turn the key and bolt the door,
Sweet is death forevermore.
Nor haughty hope, nor swart chagrin,
Nor murdering hate, can enter in.
IN MEMORIAM
E.B.E.
III
ELEMENTS AND MOTTOES
EXPERIENCE
THE lords of life, the lords of life,--
I saw them pass
In their own guise,
Like and unlike,
Portly and grim,--
Use and Surprise,
Surface and Dream,
Succession swift and spectral Wrong,
Temperament without a tongue,
And the inventor of the game
Omnipresent without name;--
Some to see, some to be guessed,
They marched from east to west:
Little man, least of all,
Among the legs of his guardians tall,
Walked about with puzzled look.
Him by the hand dear Nature took,
Dearest Nature, strong and kind,
Whispered,' Darling, never mind!
To-morrow they will wear another face,
The founder thou; these are thy race!'
COMPENSATION
THE wings of Time are black and white,
Pied with morning and with night.
Mountain tall and ocean deep
Trembling balance duly keep.
In changing moon and tidal wave
Glows the feud of Want and Have.
Gauge of more and less through space,
Electric star or pencil plays,
The lonely Earth amid the balls
That hurry through the eternal halls,
A makeweight flying to the void,
Supplemental asteroid,
Or compensatory spark,
Shoots across the neutral Dark.
POLITICS
GOLD and iron are good
To buy iron and gold;
All earth's fleece and food
For their like are sold.
Boded Merlin wise,
Proved Napoleon great,
Nor kind nor coinage buys
Aught above its rate.
Fear, Craft and Avarice
Cannot rear a State.
Out of dust to build
What is more than dust,--
Walls Amphion piled
Phbus stablish must.
When the Muses nine
With the Virtues meet,
Find to their design
An Atlantic seat,
By green orchard boughs
Fended from the heat,
HEROISM
RUBY wine is drunk by knaves,
Sugar spends to fatten slaves,
Rose and vine-leaf deck buffoons;
Thunder-clouds are Jove's festoons,
Drooping oft in wreaths of dread,
Lightning-knotted round his head;
The hero is not fed on sweets,
Daily his own heart he eats;
Chambers of the great are jails,
And head-winds right for royal sails.
CHARACTER
THE sun set, but set not his hope:
Stars rose; his faith was earlier up:
Fixed on the enormous galaxy,
Deeper and older seemed his eye;
And matched his sufferance sublime
The taciturnity of time.
He spoke, and words more soft than rain
Brought the Age of Gold again:
His action won such reverence sweet
As hid all measure of the feat.
CULTURE
CAN rules or tutors educate
The semigod whom we await?
He must be musical,
Tremulous, impressional,
Alive to gentle influence
Of landscape and of sky,
And tender to the spirit-touch
Of man's or maiden's eye:
But, to his native centre fast,
Shall into Future fuse the Past,
And the world's flowing fates in his own mould recast.
FRIENDSHIP
A RUDDY drop of manly blood
The surging sea outweighs,
The world uncertain comes and goes;
The lover rooted stays.
I fancied he was fled,--
And, after many a year,
Glowed unexhausted kindliness,
Like daily sunrise there.
My careful heart was free again,
O friend, my bosom said,
Through thee alone the sky is arched,
Through thee the rose is red;
All things through thee take nobler form,
And look beyond the earth,
The mill-round of our fate appears
A sun-path in thy worth.
Me too thy nobleness has taught
To master my despair;
The fountains of my hidden life
Are through thy friendship fair.
SPIRITUAL LAWS
THE living Heaven thy prayers respect,
House at once and architect,
Quarrying man's rejected hours,
Builds therewith eternal towers;
Sole and self-commanded works,
Fears not undermining days,
Grows by decays,
And, by the famous might that lurks
In reaction and recoil,
Makes flame to freeze and ice to boil;
Forging, through swart arms of Offence,
The silver seat of Innocence.
BEAUTY
WAS never form and never face
So sweet to SEYD as only grace
Which did not slumber like a stone,
But hovered gleaming and was gone.
Beauty chased he everywhere,
In flame, in storm, in clouds of air.
He smote the lake to feed his eye
MANNERS
GRACE, Beauty and Caprice
Build this golden portal;
Graceful women, chosen men,
Dazzle every mortal.
Their sweet and lofty countenance
ART
GIVE to barrows, trays and pans
Grace and glimmer of romance;
Bring the moonlight into noon
Hid in gleaming piles of stone;
On the city's paved street
Plant gardens lined with lilacs sweet;
Let spouting fountains cool the air,
Singing in the sun-baked square;
Let statue, picture, park and hall,
Ballad, flag and festival,
The past restore, the day adorn,
And make to-morrow a new morn.
So shall the drudge in dusty frock
Spy behind the city clock
Retinues of airy kings,
Skirts of angels, starry wings,
His fathers shining in bright fables,
His children fed at heavenly tables.
'T is the privilege of Art
Thus to play its cheerful part,
Man on earth to acclimate
And bend the exile to his fate,
And, moulded of one element
With the days and firmament,
Teach him on these as stairs to climb,
And live on even terms with Time;
Whilst upper life the slender rill
Of human sense doth overfill.
UNITY
SPACE iS ample, east and west,
But two cannot go abreast,
Cannot travel in it two:
Yonder masterful cuckoo
Crowds every egg out of the nest,
Quick or dead, except its own;
A spell is laid on sod and stone,
Night and Day were tampered with,
Every quality and pith
Surcharged and sultry with a power
That works its will on age and hour.
WORSHIP
THIS is he, who, felled by foes,
Sprung harmless up, refreshed by blows:
He to captivity was sold,
But him no prison-bars would hold:
Though they sealed him in a rock,
Mountain chains he can unlock:
Thrown to lions for their meat,
The crouching lion kissed his feet;
PRUDENCE
THEME no poet gladly sung,
Fair to old and foul to young;
Scorn not thou the love of parts,
And the articles of arts.
Grandeur of the perfect sphere
Thanks the atoms that cohere.
NATURE
I
A SUBTLE chain of countless rings
The next unto the farthest brings;
The eye reads omens where it goes,
And speaks all languages the rose;
And, striving to be man, the worm
Mounts through all the spires of form.
II
The rounded world is fair to see,
Nine times folded in mystery:
Though baffled seers cannot impart
The secret of its laboring heart,
Throb thine with Nature's throbbing breast,
And all is clear from east to west.
Spirit that lurks each form within
Beckons to spirit of its kin;
Self-kindled every atom glows
And hints the future which it owes.
II
I am owner of the sphere,
Of the seven stars and the solar year,
Of Cæsar's hand, and Plato's brain,
Of Lord Christ's heart, and Shakspeare's strain.
CIRCLES
NATURE centres into bails,
And her proud ephemerals,
Fast to surface and outside,
Scan the profile of the sphere;
Knew they what that signified,
A new genesis were here.
INTELLECT
Go, speed the stars of Thought
On to their shining goals;--
The sower scatters broad his seed;
The wheat thou strew'st be souls.
GIFTS
GIFTS of one who loved me,--
'T was high time they came;
When he ceased to love me,
Time they stopped for shame.
PROMISE
IN countless upward-striving waves
The moon-drawn tide-wave strives;
In thousand far-transplanted grafts
The parent fruit survives;
So, in the new-born millions,
The perfect Adam lives.
POWER
HIS tongue was framed to music,
And his hand was armed with skill;
His face was the mould of beauty,
And his heart the throne of will.
WEALTH
WHO shall tell what did befall,
Far away in time, when once,
Over the lifeless ball,
Hung idle stars and suns?
What god the element obeyed?
Wings of what wind the lichen bore,
Wafting the puny seeds of power,
Which, lodged in rock, the rock abrade?
And well the primal pioneer
Knew the strong task to it assigned,
Patient through Heaven's enormous year
To build in matter home for mind.
From air the creeping centuries drew
The matted thicket low and wide,
This must the leaves of ages strew
The granite slab to clothe and hide,
Ere wheat can wave its golden pride.
What smiths, and in what furnace, rolled
(In dizzy æons dim and mute
The reeling brain can ill compute)
Copper and iron, lead and gold?
What oldest star the fame can save
Of races perishing to pave
The planet with a floor of lime?
ILLUSIONS
FLOW, flow the waves hated,
Accursed, adored,
The waves of mutation;
No anchorage is.
Sleep is not, death is not;
Who seem to die live.
House you were born in,
Friends of your spring-time,
Old man and young maid,
Day's toil and its guerdon,
They are all vanishing,
Fleeing to fables,
Cannot be moored.
See the stars through them,
Through treacherous marbles.
Know the stars yonder,
The stars everlasting,
Are fugitive also,
And emulate, vaulted,
The lambent heat lightning
And fire-fly's flight.
QUATRAINS
A. H.
HUSH!
EVERY thought is public,
Every nook is wide;
Thy gossips spread each whisper,
And the gods from side to side.
ORATOR
HE who has no hands
Perforce must use tongue;
Foxes are so cunning
Because they are strong.
ARTIST
QUIT the hut, frequent the palace,
Reck not what the people say;
For still, where'er the trees grow biggest,
Huntsmen find the easiest way.
POET
EVER the Poet from the land
Steers his bark and trims his sail;
Right out to sea his courses stand,
New worlds to find in pinnace frail.
POET
To clothe the fiery thought
In simple words succeeds,
For still the craft of genius is
To mask a king in weeds.
BOTANIST
Go thou to thy learned task,
I stay with the flowers of Spring:
Do thou of the Ages ask
What me the Hours will bring.
GARDENER
TRUE Brahmin, in the morning meadows wet,
Expound the Vedas of the violet,
Or, hid in vines, peeping through many a loop,
See the plum redden, and the beurré stoop.
FORESTER
HE took the color of his vest
From rabbit's coat or grouse's breast;
For, as the wood-kinds lurk and hides
So walks the woodman, unespied.
NORTHMAN
THE gale that wrecked you on the sand,
It helped my rowers to row;
The storm is my best galley hand
And drives me where I go.
FROM ALCUIN
THE sea is the road of the bold,
Frontier of the wheat-sown plains,
The pit wherein the streams are rolled
And fountain of the rains.
EXCELSIOR
OVER his head were the maple buds,
And over the tree was the moon,
And over the moon were the starry studs
That drop from the angels' shoon.
S. H.
WITH beams December planets dart
His cold eye truth and conduct scanned,
July was in his sunny heart,
October in his liberal hand.
NATURE
BOON Nature yields each day a brag which we now first behold,
And trains us on to slight the new, as if it were the old:
But blest is he, who, playing deep, yet haply asks not why,
Too busied with the crowded hour to fear to live or die.
FATE
HER planted eye to-day controls,
Is in the morrow most at home,
And sternly calls to being souls
That curse her when they come.
HOROSCOPE
ERE he was born, the stars of fate
Plotted to make him rich and great:
When from the womb the babe was loosed,
The gate of gifts behind him closed.
POWER
CAST the bantling on the rocks,
Suckle him with the she-wolf's teat,
Wintered with the hawk and fox,
Power and speed be hands and feet.
CLIMACTERIC
I AM not wiser for my age,
Nor skilful by my grief;
Life loiters at the hoofs first page,--
Ah! could we turn the leaf.
MEMORY
NIGHT-DREAMS trace on Memory's wall
Shadows of the thoughts of day,
And thy fortunes, as they fall,
The bias of the will betray.
LOVE
LOVE on his errand bound to go
Can swim the flood and wade through snow,
Where way is none,'t will creep and wind
And eat through Alps its home to find.
SACRIFICE
THOUGH love repine, and reason chafe,
There came a voice without reply,--
''T is man's perdition to be safe,
When for the truth he ought to die.'
PERICLES
WELL and wisely said the Greek,
Be thou faithful, but not fond;
To the altar's foot thy fellow seek,--
The Furies wait beyond.
CASELLA
TEST of the poet is knowledge of love,
For Eros is older than Saturn or Jove;
Never was poet, of late or of yore,
Who was not tremulous with love-lore.
SHAKSPEARE
I SEE all human wits
Are measured but a few;
Unmeasured still my Shakspeare sits,
Lone as the blessed Jew.
HAFIZ
HER passions the shy violet
From Hafiz never hides;
Love-longings of the raptured bird
The bird to him confides.
NATURE IN LEASTS
As sings the pine-tree in the wind,
So sings in the wind a sprig of the pine;
Her strength and soul has laughing France
Shed in each drop of wine.
TRANSLATIONS
SONNET OF MICHEL ANGELO BUONAROTTI
NEVER did sculptor's dream unfold
A form which marble doth not hold
In its white block; yet it therein shall find
Only the hand secure and bold
Which still obeys the mind.
So hide in thee, thou heavenly dame,
The ill I shun, the good I claim;
I alas! not well alive,
Miss the aim whereto I strive.
Not love, nor beauty's pride,
Nor Fortune, nor thy coldness, can I chide,
If, whilst within thy heart abide
Both death and pity, my unequal skill
Fails of the life, but draws the death and ill.
THE EXILE
FROM THE PERSIAN OF KERMANI
FROM HAFIZ
I SAID to heaven that glowed above,
O hide yon sun-filled zone,
Hide all the stars you boast;
For, in the world of love
And estimation true,
The heaped-up harvest of the moon
Is worth one barley-corn at most,
The Pleiads' sheaf but two.
EPITAPH
BETHINK, poor heart, what bitter kind of jest
Mad Destiny this tender stripling played;
For a warm breast of maiden to his breast,
She laid a slab of marble on his head.
THEY say, through patience, chalk
Becomes a ruby stone;
Ah, yes! but by the true heart's blood
The chalk is crimson grown.
FRIENDSHIP
THOU foolish Hafiz! Say, do churls
Know the worth of Oman's pearls?
Give the gem which dims the moon
To the noblest, or to none.
THE FLUTE
FROM HILALI
HARK what, now loud, now low, the pining flute complains,
Without tongue, yellow-cheeked, full of winds that wail and sigh;
Saying, Sweetheart! the old mystery remains,--
If I am I; thou, thou; or thou art I?
TO THE SHAH
FROM HAFIZ
TO THE SHAH
FROM ENWERI
TO THE SHAH
FROM ENWERI
V
APPENDIX
THE POET
I
RIGHT upward on the road of fame
With sounding steps the poet came;
Born and nourished in miracles,
His feet were shod with golden bells,
Or where he stepped the soil did peal
As if the dust were glass and steel.
The gallant child where'er he came
Threw to each fact a tuneful name.
The things whereon he cast his eyes
Could not the nations rebaptize,
Nor Time's snows hide the names he set,
Nor last posterity forget.
Yet every scroll whereon he wrote
In latent fire his secret thought,
Fell unregarded to the ground,
Unseen by such as stood around.
The pious wind took it away,
The reverent darkness hid the lay.
Methought like water-haunting birds
Divers or dippers were his words,
And idle clowns beside the mere
At the new vision gape and jeer.
II
The gods talk in the breath of the woods,
They talk in the shaken pine,
And fill the long reach of the old seashore
With dialogue divine;
CHORUS OF SPIRITS
Means, dear brother, ask them not;
Soul's desire is means enow,
Pure content is angel's lot,
Thine own theatre art thou.
POET
I see your forms with deep content,
I know that ye are excellent,
But will ye stay?
I hear the rustle of wings,
Ye mediate what to say
Ere ye go to quit me for ever and aye.
SPIRITS
Brother, we are no phantom band;
Brother, accept this fatal hand.
Aches thine unbelieving heart
With the fear that we must part?
See, all we are rooted here
By one thought to one same sphere;
From thyself thou canst not flee,--
From thyself no more can we.
POET
Suns and stars their courses keep,
But not angels of the deep:
Day and night their turn observe,
But the day of day may swerve.
Is there warrant that the waves
Of thought in their mysterious caves
Will heap in me their highest tide,
In me therewith beatified?
Unsure the ebb and flood of thought,
The moon comes back,--the Spirit not.
SPIRITS
Brother, sweeter is the Law
Than all the grace Love ever saw;
We are its suppliants. By it, we
Draw the breath of Eternity;
Serve thou it not for daily bread,--
Serve it for pain and fear and need.
Love it, though it hide its light;
By love behold the sun at night.
If the Law Should thee forget,
More enamoured serve it yet;
Though it hate thee, suffer long;
Put the Spirit in the wrong;
Brother, no decrepitude
Chills the limbs of Time;
As fleet his feet, his hands as good,
His vision as sublime:
On Nature's wheels there is no rust;
Nor less on man's enchanted dust
Beauty and Force alight.
II
The Dervish whined to Said,
"Thou didst not tarry while I prayed.
Beware the fire that Eblis burned."
But Saadi coldly thus returned,
"Once with manlike love and fear
I gave thee for an hour my ear,
I kept the sun and stars at bay,
III
Said Saadi, "When I stood before
Hassan the camel-driver's door,
I scorned the fame of Timour brave;
Timour, to Hassan, was a slave.
In every glance of Hassan's eye
I read great years of victory,
And I, who cower mean and small
In the frequent interval
When wisdom not with me resides,
Worship Toil's wisdom that abides.
I shunned his eyes, that faithful man's,
I shunned the toiling Hassan's glance."
IV
The civil world will much forgive
To bards who from its maxims live,
But if, grown bold, the poet dare
Bend his practice to his prayer
And following his mighty heart
Shame the times and live apart,--
Væ solis! I found this,
That of goods I could not miss
If I fell within the line,
Once a member, all was mine,
V
Mask thy wisdom with delight,
Toy with the bow, yet hit the white,
As Jelaleddin old and gray;
He seemed to bask, to dream and play
Without remoter hope or fear
Than still to entertain his ear
And pass the burning summer-time
In the palm-grove with a rhyme;
Heedless that each cunning word
Tribes and ages overheard:
Those idle catches told the laws
Holding Nature to her cause.
By thoughts I lead
Bards' to say what nations need;
What imports, what irks and what behooves,
Framed afar as Fates and Loves.
DAY by day for her darlings to her much she added more;
In her hundred-gated Thebes every chamber was a door,
A door to something grander,--loftier walls, and vaster floor.
THE EARTH
OUR eyeless bark sails free
Though with boom and spar
Andes, Alp or Himmalee,
Strikes never moon or star.
THE HEAVENS
WISP and meteor nightly falling,
But the Stars of God remain.
TRANSITION
SEE yonder leafless trees against the sky,
How they diffuse themselves into the air,
And, ever subdividing, separate
Limbs into branches, branches into twigs,
As if they loved the element, and hasted
To dissipate their being into it.
THE GARDEN
MANY things the garden shows,
And pleased I stray
From tree to tree
Watching the white pear-bloom,
Bee-infested quince or plum.
I could walk days, years, away
Till the slow ripening, secular tree
Had reached its fruiting-time,
Nor think it long.
BIRDS
DARLINGS of children and of bard,
Perfect kinds by vice unmarred,
All of worth and beauty set
Gems in Nature's cabinet;
These the fables she esteems
Reality most like to dreams.
Welcome back, you little nations,
Far-travelled in the south plantations;
Bring your music and rhythmic flight,
Your colors for our eyes' delight:
Freely nestle in our roof,
Weave your chamber weatherproof;
And your enchanting manners bring
And your autumnal gathering.
Exchange in conclave general
Greetings kind to each and all,
Conscious each of duty done
And unstainèd as the sun.
WATER
THE water understands
Civilization well;
It wets my foot, but prettily
It chills my life, but wittily,
It is not disconcerted,
It is not broken-hearted:
Well used, it decketh joy,
Adorneth, doubleth joy:
Ill used, it will destroy,
In perfect time and measure
With a face of golden pleasure
Elegantly destroy.
NAHANT
ALL day the waves assailed the rock,
I heard no church-bell chime,
The sea-beat scorns the minster clock
And breaks the glass of Time.
SUNRISE
WOULD you know what joy is hid
In our green Musketaquid,
And for travelled eyes what charms
Draw us to these meadow farms,
Come and I will show you all
Makes each day a festival.
Stand upon this pasture hill,
Face the eastern star until
The slow eye of heaven shall show
The world above, the world below.
NIGHT IN JUNE
I LEFT my dreary page and sallied forth,
Received the fair inscriptions of the night;
The moon was making amber of the world,
Glittered with silver every cottage pane,
The trees were rich, yet ominous with gloom.
The meadows broad
From ferns and grapes and from the folded flowers
Sent a nocturnal fragrance; harlot flies
Flashed their small fires in air, or held their court
In fairy groves of herds-grass.
HE lives not who can refuse me;
All my force saith, Come and use me:
A gleam of sun, a summer rain,
And all the zone is green again.
MAIA
ILLUSION works impenetrable,
Weaving webs innumerable,
Her gay pictures never fail,
Crowds each on other, veil on veil,
Charmer who will be believed
By man who thirsts to be deceived.
LIFE
A TRAIN of gay and clouded days
Dappled with joy and grief and praise,
Beauty to fire us, saints to save,
Escort us to a little grave.
ROOMY Eternity
Casts her schemes rarely,
And an æon allows
For each quality and part
Of the multitudinous
And many-chambered heart.
Love
Asks nought his brother cannot give;
Asks nothing, but does all receive.
Love calls not to his aid events;
He to his wants can well suffice:
Asks not of others soft consents,
Nor kind occasion without eyes;
Nor plots to ope or bolt a gate,
Nor heeds Condition's iron walls,--
Where he goes, goes before him Fate;
Whom he uniteth, God installs;
Instant and perfect his access
To the dear object of his thought,
Though foes and land and seas between
Himself and his love intervene.
REX
THE bard and mystic held me for their own,
I filled the dream of sad, poetic maids,
I took the friendly noble by the hand,
I was the trustee of the hand-cart man,
The brother of the fisher, porter, swain,
And these from the crowd's edge well pleased beheld
The service done to me as done to them.
WITH the key of the secret he marches faster,
From strength to strength, and for night brings
day;
While classes or tribes, too weak to master
The flowing conditions of life, give way.
SUUM CUIQUE
WILT thou seal up the avenues of ill?
Pay every debt as if God wrote the bill.
GRACE
How much, preventing God, how much I owe
To the defences thou hast round me set;
Example, custom, fear, occasion slow,--
These scorned bondmen were my parapet.
I dare not peep over this parapet
To gauge with glance the roaring gulf below,
The depths of sin to which I had descended,
Had not these me against myself defended.
INSIGHT
POWER that by obedience grows,
Knowledge which its source not knows,
Wave which severs whom it bears
From the things which he compares,
Adding wings through things to range,
To his own blood harsh and strange.
PAN
O WHAT are heroes, prophets, men,
But pipes through which the breath of Pan doth blow
A momentary music. Being's tide
Swells hitherward, and myriads of forms
Live, robed with beauty, painted by the sun;
Their dust, pervaded by the nerves of God,
Throbs with an overmastering energy
Knowing and doing. Ebbs the tide, they lie
White hollow shells upon the desert shore,
But not the less the eternal wave rolls on
To animate new millions, and exhale
Races and planets, its enchanted foam.
SEPTEMBER
IN the turbulent beauty
Of a gusty Autumn day,
Poet on a sunny headland
Sighed his soul away.
EROS
THEY put their finger on their lip,
The Powers above:
The seas their islands clip,
The moons in ocean dip,
They love, but name not love.
OCTOBER
OCTOBER woods wherein
The boy's dream comes to pass,
And Nature squanders on the boy her pomp,
And crowns him with a more than royal crown,
And unimagined splendor waits his steps.
The gazing urchin walks through tents of gold,
Through crimson chambers, porphyry and pearl,
Pavilion on pavilion, garlanded,
Incensed and starred with lights and airs and shapes,
Color and sound, music to eye and ear,
Beyond the best conceit of pomp or power.
PETER'S FIELD
[KNOWS he who tills this lonely field
To reap its scanty corn,
What mystic fruit his acres yield
At midnight and at morn?]
MUSIC
LET me go where'er I will,
I bear a sky-born music still:
It sounds from all things old,
It sounds from all things young,
From all that's fair, from all that's foul,
Peals out a cheerful song.
THE WALK
A QUEEN rejoices in her peers,
And wary Nature knows her own
By court and city, dale and down,
And like a lover volunteers,
And to her son will treasures more
And more to purpose freely pour
In one wood walk, than learned men
Can find with glass in ten times ten.
COSMOS
WHO saw the hid beginnings
When Chaos and Order strove,
Or who can date the morning,
The purple flaming of love?
THE MIRACLE
I HAVE trod this path a hundred times
With idle footsteps, crooning rhymes.
I know each nest and web-worm's tent,
The fox-hole which the woodchucks rent,
Maple and oak, the old Divan
Self-planted twice, like the banian.
I know not why I came again
Unless to learn it ten times ten.
To read the sense the woods impart
You must bring the throbbing heart.
Love is aye the counterforce,--
Terror and Hope and wild Remorse,
Newest knowledge, fiery thought,
Or Duty to grand purpose wrought.
Wandering yester morn the brake,
I reached this heath beside the lake,
And oh, the wonder of the power,
The deeper secret of the hour!
Nature, the supplement of man,
His hidden sense interpret can;--
What friend to friend cannot convey
Shall the dumb bird instructed say.
Passing yonder oak, I heard
Sharp accents of my woodland bird;
I watched the singer with delight,--
But mark what changed my joy to fright,--
When that bird sang, I gave the theme;
That wood-bird sang my last night's dream,
A-brown wren was the Daniel
That pierced my trance its drift to tell,
Knew my quarrel, how and why,
Published it to lake and sky,
Told every word and syllable
In his flippant chirping babble,
All my wrath and all my shames,
Nay, God is witness, gave the names.
THE WATERFALL
A PATCH of meadow upland
Reached by a mile of road,
Soothed by the voice of waters,
With birds and flowers bestowed.
WALDEN
IN my garden three ways meet,
Thrice the spot is blest;
Hermit-thrush comes there to build,
Carrier-doves to nest.
THE ENCHANTER
IN the deep heart of man a poet dwells
Who all the day of life his summer story tells;
Scatters on every eye dust of his spells,
Scent, form and color; to the flowers and shells
Wins the believing child with wondrous tales;
Touches a cheek with colors of romance,
And crowds a history into a glance;
Gives beauty to the lake and fountain,
Spies oversea the fires of the mountain;
When thrushes ope their throat, 't is he that sings,
And he that paints the oriole's fiery wings.
The little Shakspeare in the maiden's heart
Makes Romeo of a plough-boy on his cart;
Opens the eye to Virtue's starlike meed
And gives persuasion to a gentle deed.
RICHES
HAVE ye seen the caterpillar
Foully warking in his nest?
'T is the poor man getting siller,
Without cleanness, without rest.
PHILOSOPHER
PHILOSOPHERS are lined with eyes within,
And, being so, the sage unmakes the man.
In love, he cannot therefore cease his trade;
Scarce the first blush has overspread his cheek,
He feels it, introverts his learned eye
To catch the unconscious heart in the very act.
INTELLECT
GRAVELY it broods apart on joy,
And, truth to tell, amused by pain.
LIMITS
WHO knows this or that?
Hark in the wall to the rat:
Since the world was, he has gnawed;
Of his wisdom, of his fraud
What dost thou know?
In the wretched little beast
Is life and heart,
Child and parent,
Not without relation
To fruitful field and sun and moon.
What art thou? His wicked eye
Is cruel to thy cruelty.
THE EXILE
(Note: (AFTER TALIESSIN))THE heavy blue chain
Of the boundless main
Didst thou, just man, endure.
VI
POEMS OF YOUTH AND EARLY MANHOOD
1823-1834
THE BELL
I LOVE thy music, mellow bell,
I love thine iron chime,
To life or death, to heaven or hell,
Which calls the sons of Time.
1823
THOUGHT
I AM not poor, but I am proud,
Of one inalienable right,
Above the envy of the crowd,--
Thought's holy light.
Boston, 1823
PRAYER
WHEN success exalts thy lot,
God for thy virtue lays a plot:
And all thy life is for thy own,
Then for mankind's instruction shown;
And though thy knees were never bent,
To Heaven thy hourly prayers are sent,
And whether formed for good or ill,
Are registered and answered still.
1826 [?].
I BEAR in youth the sad infirmities
That use to undo the limb and sense of age;
It hath pleased Heaven to break the dream of bliss
Which lit my onward way with bright presage,
And my unserviceable limbs forego.
The sweet delight I found in fields and farms,
On windy hills, whose tops with morning glow,
And lakes, smooth mirrors of Aurora's charms.
Yet I think on them in the silent night,
Still breaks that morn, though dim, to Memory's eye,
And the firm soul does the pale train defy
Of grim Disease, that would her peace affright.
Please God, I'll wrap me in mine innocence,
And bid each awful Muse drive the damned harpies hence.
Cambridge, 1827
BE of good cheer, brave spirit; steadfastly
Serve that low whisper thou hast served; for know,
God hath a select family of sons
Now scattered wide thro' earth, and each alone,
Who are thy spiritual kindred, and each one
By constant service to that inward law,
Is weaving the sublime proportions
Of a true monarch's soul. Beauty and strength,
TO-DAY
I RAKE no coffined clay, nor publish wide
The resurrection of departed pride.
Safe in their ancient crannies, dark and deep,
Let kings and conquerors, saints and soldiers sleep--
Late in the world,--too late perchance for fame,
Just late enough to reap abundant blame,--
I choose a novel theme, a bold abuse
Of critic charters, an unlaurelled Muse.
1824
FAME
AH Fate, cannot a man
Be wise without a beard?
East, West, from Beer to Dan,
Say, was it never heard
That wisdom might in youth be gotten,
Or wit be ripe before 't was rotten?
1824
THE SUMMONS
A STERNER errand to the silken troop
Has quenched the uneasy blush that warmed my cheek;
I am commissioned in my day of joy
To leave my woods and streams and the sweet sloth
Of prayer and song that were my dear delight,
To leave the rudeness of my woodland life,
Sweet twilight walks and midnight solitude
And kind acquaintance with the morning stars
And the glad hey-day of my household hours,
The innocent mirth which sweetens daily bread,
Railing in love to those who rail again,
1826
THE RIVER
AND I behold once more
My old familiar haunts; here the blue river,
The same blue wonder that my infant eye
Admired, sage doubting whence the traveller came,--
Whence brought his sunny bubbles ere he washed
The fragrant flag-roots in my father's fields,
And where thereafter in the world he went.
Look, here he is, unaltered, save that now
He hath broke his banks and flooded all the vales
With his redundant waves.
Here is the rock where, yet a simple child,
I caught with bended pin my earliest fish,
Much triumphing,--and these the fields
Over whose flowers I chased the butterfly,
A blooming hunter of a fairy fine.
And hark! where overhead the ancient crows
Hold their sour conversation in the sky:--
These are the same, but I am not the same,
But wiser than I was, and wise enough
Not to regret the changes, tho' they cost
Me many a sigh. Oh, call not Nature dumb;
These trees and stones are audible to me,
These idle flowers, that tremble in the wind,
I understand their faery syllables,
And all their sad significance. The wind,
That rustles down the well-known forest road--
It hath a sound more eloquent than speech.
The stream, the trees, the grass, the sighing wind,
All of them utter sounds of 'monishment
And grave parental love.
They are not of our race, they seem to say,
And yet have knowledge of our moral race,
And somewhat of majestic sympathy,
Something of pity for the puny clay,
That holds and boasts the immeasurable mind.
I feel as I were welcome to these trees
After long months of weary wandering,
Acknowledged by their hospitable boughs;
They know me as their son, for side by side,
They were coeval with my ancestors,
Adorned with them my country's primitive times,
And soon may give my dust their funeral shade.
1827.
LINES TO ELLEN
TELL me, maiden, dost thou use
Thyself thro' Nature to diffuse?
All the angles of the coast
Were tenanted by thy sweet ghost,
Bore thy colors every flower,
Thine each leaf and berry bore;
All wore thy badges and thy favors
In their scent or in their savors,
Every moth with painted wing,
Every bird in carolling,
The wood-boughs with thy manners waved,
The rocks uphold thy name engraved,
The sod throbbed friendly to my feet,
And the sweet air with thee was sweet.
The saffron cloud that floated warm
Studied thy motion, took thy form,
And in his airy road benign
Recalled thy skill in bold design,
Or seemed to use his privilege
To gaze o'er the horizon's edge,
To search where now thy beauty glowed,
Or made what other purlieus proud.
1829.
SECURITY
THOUGH her eye seek other forms
And a glad delight below,
Yet the love the world that warms
Bids for me her bosom glow.
1831.
A MOUNTAIN GRAVE
WHY fear to die
And let thy body lie
Under the flowers of June,
Thy body food
For the ground-worms' brood
And thy grave smiled on by the visiting moon.
1831.
HYMN
THERE is in all the sons of men
A love that in the spirit dwells,
That panteth after things unseen,
And tidings of the future tells.
June, 1831.
SELF-RELIANCE
HENCEFORTH, please God, forever I forego
The yoke of men's opinions. I will be
Light-hearted as a bird, and live with God.
I find him in the bottom of my heart,
I hear continually his voice therein.
October 9, 1832.
AND when I am entombèd in my place,
Be it remembered of a single man,
He never, though he dearly loved his race,
For fear of human eyes swerved from his plan.
1833.
WRITTEN IN NAPLES
WE are what we are made; each following day
Is the Creator of our human mould
Not less than was the first; the all-wise God
Gilds a few points in every several life,
And as each flower upon the fresh hillside,
And every colored petal of each flower,
Is sketched and dyed, each with a new design,
Its spot of purple, and its streak of brown,
So each man's life shall have its proper lights,
And a few joys, a few peculiar charms,
For him round-in the melancholy hours
And reconcile him to the common days.
Not many men see beauty in the fogs
Of close low pine-woods in a river town;
Yet unto me not morn's magnificence,
Nor the red rainbow of a summer eve,
Nor Rome, nor joyful Paris, nor the halls
Of rich men blazing hospitable light,
Nor wit, nor eloquence,--no, nor even the song
Of any woman that is now alive,--
Hath such a soul, such divine influence,
Such resurrection of the happy past,
As is to me when I behold the morn
Ope in such low moist roadside, and beneath
Peep the blue violets out of the black loam,
Pathetic silent poets that sing to me
Thine elegy, sweet singer, sainted wife.
March, 1833
WRITTEN AT ROME
ALONE in Rome. Why, Rome is lonely too;--
Besides, you need not be alone; the soul
Shall have society of its own rank.
Be great, be true, and all the Scipios,
The Catos, the wise patriots of Rome,
Shall flock to you and tarry by your side,
And comfort you with their high company.
Virtue alone is sweet society,
It keeps the key to all heroic hearts,
And opens you a welcome in them all.
You must be like them if you desire them,
Scorn trifles and embrace a better aim
Than wine or sleep or praise;
Hunt knowledge as the lover wooes a maid,
And ever in the strife of your own thoughts
Obey the nobler impulse; that is Rome:
That shall command a senate to your side;
For there is no might in the universe
That can contend with love. It reigns forever.
Wait then, sad friend, wait in majestic peace
The hour of heaven. Generously trust
Thy fortune's web to the beneficent hand
That until now has put his world in fee
To thee. He watches for thee still. His love
Broods over thee, and as God lives in heaven,
However long thou walkest solitary,
The hour of heaven shall come, the man appear.
1833
WEBSTER
1831
LET Webster's lofty face
Ever on thousands shine,
A beacon set that Freedom's race
Might gather omens from that radiant sign.
1854
WHY did all manly gifts in Webster fail?
He wrote on Nature's grandest brow, For Sale.
Michael Angelo
MICHAEL ANGELO.
MICHAEL ANGELO 1
Few lives of eminent men are harmonious; few that furnish, in all the facts, an image corresponding
with their fame. But all things recorded of Michael Angelo Buonarotti agree together. He lived one
life ; he pursued one career. He accomplished extraordinary works ; he uttered extraordinary words;
and in this greatness was so little eccentricity, so true was he to the laws of the human mind, that
his character and his works, like Sir Isaac Newton's, seem rather a part of nature than arbitrary
productions of the human will. Especially we venerate his moral fame. Whilst his name belongs to
the highest class of genius, his life contains in it no injurious influence. Every line in his biography
might be read to the human race with wholesome effect. The means, the materials of his activity,
were coarse enough to be appreciated, being addressed for the most part to the eye ; the results,
sublime and all innocent. A purity severe and even terrible goes out from the lofty productions of
his pencil and his chisel, and again from the more perfect sculpture of his own life, which heals and
exalts. " He nothing common did, or mean," and dying at the end of near ninety years, had not yet
become old, but was engaged in executing his grand conceptions in the ineffaceable architecture of
St. Peter's.
Above all men whose history we know, Michael Angelo presents us with the perfect image of the
artist. He is an eminent master in the four fine arts, Painting, Sculpture, Architecture and Poetry. In
three of them by visible means, and in poetry by words, he strove to express the Idea of Beauty.
This idea possessed him and determined all his activity. Beauty in the largest sense, beauty inward
and outward, comprehending grandeur as a part, and reaching to goodness as its soul, - this to
receive and this to impart, was his genius.
It is a happiness to find, amid the falsehood and griefs of the human race, a soul at intervals born to
behold and create only beauty. So shall not the indescribable charm of the natural world, the great
spectacle of morn and evening which shut and open the most disastrous day, want observers. The
ancient Greeks called the world kóopuos, Beauty; a name which, in our artificial state of society,
sounds fanciful and impertinent. Yet, in proportion as man rises above the servitude to wealth and a
pursuit of mean pleasures, he perceives that what is most real is most beautiful, and that, by the
contemplation of such objects, he is taught and exalted. This truth, that perfect beauty and perfect
goodness are one, was made known to Michael Angelo ; and we shall endeavor by sketches from his
life to show the direction and limitations of his search after this element.
In considering a life dedicated to the study of Beauty, it is natural to inquire, what is Beauty? Can
this charming element be so abstracted by the human mind, as to become a distinct and permanent
object? Beauty cannot be defined. Like Truth, it is an ultimate aim of the human being. It does not
lie within the limits of the understanding. " The nature of the beautiful," - we gladly borrow the
language of Moritz, a German critic, - " consists herein, that because the understanding in the
presence of the beautiful cannot ask, ' Why is it beautiful? for that reason is it so. There is no
standard whereby the understanding can determine whether objects are beautiful or otherwise.
`What other standard of the beautiful exists, than the en-tire circuit of all harmonious proportions
of the great system of nature ? All particular beauties scattered up and down in nature are only so
far beautiful, as they suggest more or less in themselves this entire circuit of harmonious
proportions."
This great Whole, the understanding cannot em-brace. Beauty may be felt. It may be produced. But
it cannot be defined.
The Italian artists sanction this view of beauty by describing it as il piu nnell' uno, "the many in
one," or multitude in unity, intimating that what is truly beautiful seems related to all nature. A
beautiful person has a kind of universality, and appears to have truer conformity to all pleasing
objects in external nature than another. Every great work of art seems to take up into itself the
excellencies of all works, and to present, as it were, a miniature of nature.
In relation to this element of Beauty, the minds of men divide themselves into two classes. In the
first place, all men have an organization corresponding more or less to the entire system of nature,
and therefore a power of deriving pleasure from Beauty. This is Taste. In the second place, certain
minds, more closely harmonized with nature, possess the power of abstracting Beauty from things,
and re-producing it in new forms, on any object to which accident may determine their activity ; as
stone, canvas, song, history. This is Art.
Since Beauty is thus an abstraction of the harmony and proportion that reigns in all nature, it is
therefore studied in nature, and not in what does not exist. Hence the celebrated French maxim of
Rhetoric, Rien de beau que le vrai; "Nothing is beautiful but what is true." It has a much wider
application than to Rhetoric ; as wide, namely, as the terms of the proposition admit. In art,
Michael Angelo is himself but a document or verification of this maxim. He labored to express the
beautiful, in the entire conviction that it was only to be attained unto by knowledge of the true.
The common eye is satisfied with the surface on which it rests. The wise eye knows that it is
surface, and, if beautiful, only the result of interior harmonies, which, to him who knows them,
compose the image of higher beauty. Moreover, he knew well that only by an understanding of the
internal mechanism can the outside be faithfully delineated. The walls of houses are transparent to
the architect. The symptoms disclose the constitution to the physician ; and to the artist it belongs
by a better knowledge of anatomy, and, within anatomy, of life and thought, to acquire the power
of true drawing. " The human form," says Goethe, "cannot be comprehended through seeing its
surface. It must be stripped of the muscles, its parts separated, its joints observed, its divisions
marked, its action and counter action learned ; the hidden, the reposing, the foundation of the
apparent, must be searched, if one would really see and imitate what moves as a beautiful
inseparable whole in living waves before the eye." Michael
Angelo dedicated himself, from his childhood to his death, to a toilsome observation of nature. The
first anecdote recorded of him shows him to be al-ready on the right road. Granacci, a painter's
apprentice, having lent him, when a boy, a print of St. Antony beaten by devils, together with some
colors and pencils, he went to the fish-market to observe the form and color of fins and of the eyes
of fish. Cardinal Farnese one day found him, when an old man, walking alone in the Coliseum, and
expressed his surprise at finding him solitary amidst the ruins ; to which he replied, " I go yet to
school that I may continue to learn." And one of the last drawings in his portfolio is a sublime hint of
his own feeling ; for it is a sketch of an old man with a long beard, in a go-cart, with an hour-glass
before him ; and the motto, Ancora imparo, " I still learn."
In this spirit he devoted himself to the study of anatomy for twelve years ; we ought to say rather,
as long as he lived. The depth of his knowledge in anatomy has no parallel among the artists of
mod-ern times. Most of his designs, his contemporaries inform us, were made with a pen, and in the
style of an engraving on copper or wood ; a manner more expressive but not admitting of
correction. When Michael Angelo would begin a statue, he made first on paper the skeleton;
afterwards, upon another paper, the same figure clothed with muscles. The studies of the statue of
Christ in the Church of Minerva at Rome, made in this manner, were long preserved.
Those who have never given attention to the arts of design, are surprised that the artist should find
so much to study in a fabric of such limited parts and dimensions as the human body. But reflection
discloses evermore a closer analogy between the finite form and the infinite inhabitant. Man is the
highest, and indeed the only proper object of plastic art. There needs no better proof of our
instinctive feeling of the immense expression of which the human figure is capable, than the
uniform tendency which the religion of every country has betrayed towards Anthropomorphism, or
attributing to the Deity the human form. And behold the effect of this familiar object every day !
No acquaintance with the secrets of its mechanism, no degrading views of human nature, not the
most swinish compost of mud and blood that was ever misnamed philosophy, can avail to hinder us
from doing involuntary reverence to any exhibition of majesty or surpassing beauty in human clay.
Our knowledge of its highest expression we owe to the Fine Arts. Not easily in this age will any man
acquire by himself such perceptions of the dignity or grace of the human frame, as the student of
art owes to the remains of Phidias, to the Apollo, the Jove, the paintings and statues of Michael
Angelo, and the works of Canova. There are now in Italy, both on canvas and in marble, forms and
faces which the imagination is enriched by contemplating. Goethe says that he is but half himself
who has never seen the Juno in the Rondanini pal-ace at Rome. Seeing these works true to human
nature and yet superhuman, " we feel that we are greater than we know." Seeing these works, we
appreciate the taste which led Michael Angelo, against the taste and against the admonition of his
patrons, to cover the walls of churches with unclothed figures, " improper " says his biographer, . "
for the place, but proper for the exhibition of all the pomp of his profound knowledge."
The love of beauty which never passes beyond outline and color, was too slight an object to occupy
the powers of his genius. There is a closer relation than is commonly thought between the fine arts
and the useful arts ; and it is an essential fact in the history of Michael Angelo, that his love of
beauty is made solid and perfect by his deep understanding of the mechanic arts. Architecture is
the bond that unites the elegant and the economical arts, and his skill in this is a pledge of his
capacity in both kinds. His Titanic handwriting in marble and travertine is to be found in every part
of Rome and Florence ; and even at Venice, on defective evidence, he is said to have given the plan
of the bridge of the Rialto. Nor was his a skill in ornament, or confined to the outline and designs of
towers and facades, but a thorough acquaintance with all the secrets of the art, with all the details
of economy and strength.
When the Florentines united themselves with Venice, England and France, to oppose the power of
the Emperor Charles V., Michael Angelo was appointed Military Architect and Engineer, to
superintend the erection of the necessary works. He visited Bologna to inspect its celebrated
fortifications, and, on his return, constructed a fortification on the heights of San Miniato, which
commands the city and environs of Florence. On the 24th of October, 1529, the Prince of Orange,
general of Charles V., encamped on the hills surrounding the city, and his first operation was to
throw up a ram-part to storm the bastion of San Miniato. His design was frustrated by the
providence of Michael Angelo. Michael made such good resistance, that the Prince directed the
artillery to demolish the tower. The artist hung mattresses of wool on the side exposed to the
attack, and by means of a bold projecting cornice, from which they were suspended, a considerable
space was left between them and the wall. This simple expedient was sufficient, and the Prince was
obliged to turn his siege into a blockade.
After an active and successful service to the city for six months, Michael Angelo was informed of a
treachery that was ripening within the walls. He communicated it to the government with his ad-
vice upon it ; but was mortified by receiving from the government reproaches at his credulity and
fear. He replied, " that it was useless for him to take care of the walls, if they were determined not
to take care of themselves, " and he withdrew privately from the city to Ferrara, and thence to
Venice. The news of his departure occasioned a general concern in Florence, and he was instantly
followed with apologies and importunities to return. He did so, and resumed his office. On the 21st
of March, 1530, the Prince of Orange assaulted the city by storm. Michael Angelo is represented as
having ordered his defence so vigorously, that the Prince was compelled to retire. By the treachery
however of the general of the Republic, Malatesta Baglioni, all his skill was rendered unavailing, and
the city capitulated on the 9th of August. The excellence of the works constructed by our artist has
been approved by Vauban, who visited them and took a plan of them.
In Rome, Michael Angelo was consulted by Pope Paul III. in building the fortifications of San Borgo.
He built the stairs of Ara Celi leading to the Church once the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus ; he
arranged the piazza of the Capitol, and built its porticoes. He was charged with rebuilding the Pons
Palatinus over the Tiber. He prepared, accordingly, a large quantity of blocks of travertine, and was
proceeding with the work, when, through the intervention of his rivals, this work was taken from
him and intrusted to Nanni di Bacio Bigio, who plays but a pitiful part in Michael's history. Nanni sold
the travertine, and filled up the piers with gravel at a small expense. Michael Angelo made known
his opinion, that the bridge could not resist the force of the current ; and, one day riding over it on
horseback, with his friend Vasari, he cried, " George, this bridge trembles under us ; let us ride
faster lest it fall whilst we are upon it." It fell, five years after it was built, in 1557, and is still
called the " Broken Bridge."
Versatility of talent in men of undoubted ability always awakens the liveliest interest ; and we
observe with delight, that, besides the sublimity and even extravagance of Michael Angelo, he
possessed an unexpected dexterity in minute mechanical contrivances. When the Sistine Chapel was
prepared for him that he might paint the ceiling, he found the platform on which he was to work,
suspended by ropes which passed through the ceiling. Michael demanded of San Gallo, the Pope's
architect, how these holes were to be repaired in the picture ?
San Gallo replied ; " That was for him to consider, for the platform could be constructed in no other
way." Michael removed the whole, and constructed a movable platform to rest and roll upon the
floor, which is believed to be the same simple contrivance which is used in Rome, at this day, to
repair the walls of churches. He gave this model to a carpenter, who made it so profitable as to
furnish a dowry for his two daughters. He was so nice in tools, that he made with his own hand the
wimbles, the files, the rasps, the chisels and all other irons and instruments which he needed in
sculpture ; and, in painting, he not only mixed but ground his colors himself, trusting no one.
And not only was this discoverer of Beauty, and its teacher among men, rooted and grounded in
those severe laws of practical skill, which genius can never teach, and which must be learned by
practice alone, but he was one of the most industrious men that ever lived. His diligence was so
great that it is wonderful how be endured its fatigues. The midnight battles, the forced marches,
the winter campaigns of Julius Caesar or Charles XII. do not indicate greater strength of body or of
mind. He finished the gigantic painting of the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in twenty months, a fact
which enlarges, it has been said, the known powers of man. Indeed he toiled so assiduously at this
painful work, that, for a long time after, he was unable to see any picture but by holding it over his
head. A little bread and wine was all his nourishment ; and he told Vasari that he often slept in his
clothes, both because he was too weary to undress, and because he would rise in the night and go
immediately to work. " I have found," says his friend, " some of his designs in Florence, where,
whilst may be seen the greatness of his genius, it may also be known that when he wished to take
Minerva from the head of Jove, there needed the hammer of Vulcan." He used to make to a single
figure nine, ten, or twelve heads before he could satisfy himself, seeking that there should be in
the composition a certain universal grace such as nature makes, saying, that " he needed to have his
compasses in his eye, and not in his hand, because the hands work whilst the eye judges." He was
accustomed to say, " Those figures alone are good, from which the labor is scraped off, when the
scaffolding is taken away."
At near eighty years, he began in marble a group of four figures for a dead Christ ; because, he said,
to exercise himself with the mallet was good for his health.
And what did he accomplish ? It does not fall within our design to give an account of his works, yet
for the sake of the completeness of our sketch we will name the principal ones. Sculpture, he called
his art, and to it he regretted afterwards he had not singly given himself. The style of his paintings
is monumental ; and even his poetry partakes of that character. In sculpture, his greatest work is
the statue of Moses in the Church of Pietro in Vincolo, in Rome. It is a sitting statue of colossal size,
and is designed to embody the Hebrew Law. The lawgiver is supposed to gaze upon the worshippers
of the golden calf. The majestic wrath of the figure daunts the beholder. In the Piazza del Gran
Duca at Florence, stands, in the open air, his David, about to hurl the stone at Goliah. In the Church
called the Minerva, at Rome, is his Christ ; an object of so much devotion to the people, that the
right foot has been shod with a brazen sandal to prevent it from being kissed away. In St. Peter's, is
his Pieta, or (lead Christ in the arms of his mother. In the Mausoleum of the Medici at Florence, are
the tombs of Lorenzo and Cosmo, with the grand statues of Night and Day, and Aurora and Twilight.
Several statues of less fame, and bas-reliefs, are in Rome and Florence and Paris.
His Paintings are in the Sistine Chapel, of which he first covered the ceiling with the story of the
creation, in successive compartments, with the great series of the Prophets and Sibyls in alternate
tablets, and a series of greater and smaller fancy-pieces in the lunettes. This is his capital work
painted in fresco. Every one of these pieces, every figure, every hand and foot and finger, is a study
of anatomy and design. Slighting the secondary arts of coloring, and all the aids of graceful finish,
he aimed exclusively, as a stern designer, to ex-press the vigor and magnificence of his conceptions.
Upon the wall, over the altar, is painted the Last Judgment.
Of his designs, the most celebrated is the cartoon representing soldiers coming out of the bath and
arming themselves ; an incident of the war of Pisa. The wonderful merit of this drawing, which
contrasts the extremes of relaxation and vigor, is conspicuous even in the coarsest prints.
Of his genius for Architecture, it is sufficient to say that he built St. Peter's, an ornament of the
earth. He said he would hang the Pantheon in the air ; and he redeemed his pledge by suspending
that vast cupola, without offence to grace or to stability, over the astonished beholder. He did not
live to complete the work ; but is there not something affecting in the spectacle of an old man, on
the verge of ninety years, carrying steadily on-ward with the heat and determination of manhood,
his poetic conceptions into progressive execution, surmounting by the dignity of his purposes all
obstacks and all enmities, and only hindered by the limits of life from fulfilling his designs? Very
slowly came he, after months and years, to the dome. At last he began to model it very small in
wax. When it was finished, he had it copied larger in wood, and by this model it was built. Long
after it was completed, and often since, to this day, rumors are occasionally spread that it is giving
way, and it is said to have been injured by unskilful attempts to repair it. Benedict XIV., during one
of these panics, sent for the architect Marchese Polini, to come to Rome and examine it. Polini put
an end to all the various projects of repairs, by the satisfying sentence ; " The cupola does not start,
and if it should start, nothing can be done but to pull it down."
The impulse of his grand style was instantaneous upon his contemporaries. Every stroke of his pencil
moved the pencil in Raphael's hand. Raphael said, " I bless Cod I live in the times of Michael Angelo."
Sir Joshua Reynolds, two centuries later, declared to the British Institution, " I feel a self-
congratulation in knowing myself capable of such sensations as he intended to excite."
A man of such habits and such deeds, made good his pretensions to a perception and to delineation
of external beauty. But inimitable as his works are, his whole life confessed that his hand was all
inadequate to express his thought. " He alone " he said, "is an artist whose hands can perfectly
execute what his mind has conceived ; " and such was his own mastery, that men said, " the marble
was flexible in his hands." Yet, contemplating ever with love the idea of absolute beauty, he was
still dissatisfied with his own work. The things proposed to him in his imagination were such, that,
for not being able with his hands to express so grand and terrible conceptions, he often abandoned
his work. For this reason he often only blocked his statue. A little before he died, he burned a great
number of designs, sketches, and cartoons made by him, being impatient of their defects. Grace in
living forms, except in very rare instances, did not satisfy him. He never made but one portrait (a
cartoon of Messer Tommaso di Cavalieri), because he abhorred to draw a likeness unless it were of
infinite beauty.
Such was his devotion to art. But let no man suppose that the images which his spirit worshipped
were mere transcripts of external grace, or that this profound soul was taken or holden in the
chains of superficial beauty. To him, of all men, it was transparent. Through it he beheid the eternal
spiritual beauty which ever clothes itself with grand and graceful outlines, as its appropriate form.
He called external grace "the frail and weary weed, in which God dresses the soul which he has
called into Time." " As from the fire, heat cannot be divided, no more can beauty from the eternal."
He was conscious in his efforts of higher aims than to address the eye. He sought, through the eye,
to reach the soul. Therefore, as, in the first place, he sought to approach the Beautiful by the study
of the True, so he failed not to make the next step of progress, and to seek Beauty in its highest
form, that of Goodness. The sublimity of his art is in his life. He did not only build a di-vine temple,
and paint and carve saints and prophets. He lived out the same inspiration. There is no spot upon
his fame. The fire and sanctity of his pencil breathe in his words. When he was in-formed that Paul
IV. desired he should paint again the side of the chapel where the Last Judgment was painted,
because of the indecorous nudity of the figures, he replied, " Tell the Pope that this is easily done.
Let him reform the world and he will find the pictures will reform themselves." He saw clearly that
if the corrupt and vulgar eyes, that could see nothing but indecorum in his terrific prophets and
angels, could be purified as his own were pure, they would only find occasion for devotion in the
same figures. As he refused to undo his work, Daniel di Volterra was employed to clothe the figures;
hence ludicrously called Il Braghetone. When the Pope suggested to him that the chapel would be
enriched if the figures were ornamented with gold, Michael Angelo replied, " In those days, gold was
not worn; and the characters I have painted were neither rich nor desirous of wealth, but holy men,
with whom gold was an object of contempt."
Not until he was in the seventy-third year of his age, he undertook the building of St. Peter's. On the
death of San Gallo, the architect of the church, Paul III. first entreated, then commanded the aged
artist, to assume the charge of this great work, which though commenced forty years before, was
only commenced by Bramante, and ill continued by San Gallo. Michael Angelo, who believed in his
own ability as a sculptor, but distrusted his capacity as an architect, at first refused and then
reluctantly complied. His heroic stipulation with the Pope was worthy of the man and the work. He
required that lie should be permitted to accept this work without any fee or reward, because he
undertook it as a religious act ; and, furthermore, that he should be absolute master of the whole
de-sign, free to depart from the plans of San Gallo and to alter what had been already done.
This disinterestedness and spirit, - no fee and no interference, - reminds one of the reward named
by the ancient Persian. When importuned to claim some compensation of the empire for the
important services he had rendered it, he demanded, " that he and his should neither command nor
obey, but should be free." However, as it was undertaken, so was it performed. When the Pope,
delighted with one of his chapels, sent him one hundred crowns of gold, as one month's wages,
Michael sent them back. The Pope was angry, but the artist was immovable. Amidst endless
annoyances from the envy and interest of the office-holders and agents in the work whom he had
displaced, he steadily ripened and executed his vast ideas. The combined desire to fulfil, in
everlasting stone, the conceptions of his mind, and to complete his worthy offering to Almighty
God, sustained him through numberless vexations with unbroken spirit. In answer to the
importunate solicitations of the Duke of Tuscany that he would come to Florence, he replies that "
to leave St. Peter's in the state in which it now was, would be to ruin the structure, and thereby be
guilty of a great sin ; " that he hoped he should shortly see the execution of his plans brought to
such a point that they could no longer be interfered with, and this was the capital object of his
wishes, " if," he adds, " I do not commit a great crime, by disappointing the cormorants who are
daily hoping to get rid of me."
A natural fruit of the nobility of his spirit is his admiration of Dante, to whom two of his sonnets are
addressed. He shared Dante's " deep contempt of the vulgar, not of the simple inhabitants of lowly
streets or humble cottages, but of that sordid and abject crowd of all classes and all places who
obscure, as much as in them lies, every beam of beauty in the universe." In like manner, he
possessed an intense love of solitude. He lived alone, and never or very rarely took his meals with
any person. As will be supposed, he had a passion for the country, and in old age speaks with
extreme pleasure of his residence with the hermits in the mountains of Spoleto ; so much so that he
says he is " only half in Rome, since, truly, peace is only to be found in the woods." Traits of an
almost savage independence mark all his history. Although he was rich, he lived like a poor man,
and never would receive a present from any person ; because it seemed to him that if a man gave
him anything, he was always obligated to that individual. His friend Vasari mentions one occasion on
which his scruples were overcome. It seems that Michael was accustomed to work at night with a
pasteboard cap or helmet on his head, into which he stuck a candle, that his work might be lighted
and his hands at liberty. Vasari observed that he did not use wax candles, but a better sort made of
the tallow of goats. He therefore sent him four bundles of them, containing forty pounds. His
servant brought them after night-fall, and presented them to him. Michael Angelo refused to
receive them. " Look you, Messer Michael Angelo," replied the man, " these candles have well nigh
broken my arm, and I will not carry them back; but just here, before your door, is a spot of soft
mud, and they will stand upright in it very well, and there I will light them all." Put them down,
then," returned Michael, "since you shall not make a bonfire at my gate." Meantime he was liberal to
profusion to his old domestic Urbino, to whom he gave at one time two thousand crowns, and made
him rich in his service.
Michael Angelo was of that class of men who are too superior to the multitude around them to
command a full and perfect sympathy. They stand in the attitude rather of appeal from their
contemporaries to their race. It has been the defect of some great men, that they did not duly
appreciate or did not confess the talents and virtues of others, and so lacked one of the richest
sources of happiness and one of the best elements of humanity. This apathy perhaps happens as
often from pre-occupied attention as from jealousy. It has been supposed that artists more than
others are liable to this defect. But Michael Angelo's praise on many works is to this day the stamp
of fame. Michael Angelo said of Masaccio's pictures that wnen they were first painted they must
have been alive. He said of his predecessor, the architect Bramante, that he laid the first stone of
St. Peter's, clear, insulated, luminous, with fit design for a vast structure. He often expressed his
admiration of Cellini's bust of Altoviti. He loved to express admiration of Titian, of Donatello, of
Ghiberti, of Brunelleschi. And it is said that when he left Florence to go to Rome, to build St.
Peter's, he turned his horse's head on the last bill from which the noble dome of the Cathedral
( built by Brunelleschi) is visible, and said, " Like you, I will not build ; better than you I cannot."
Indeed, as we have said, the reputation of many works of art now in Italy derives a sanction from
the tradition of his praise. It is more commendation to say, " This was Michael Angelo's favorite,"
than to say, " This was carried to Paris by Napoleon." Michael, however, had the philosophy to say, "
Only an inventor can use the inventions of others."
There is yet one more trait in Michael Angelo's history, which humanizes his character without
lessening its loftiness ; this is his platonic love. He was deeply enamored of the most accomplished
lady of the time, Vittoria Colonna, the widow of the Marquis di Pescara, who, after the death of her
husband, devoted herself to letters, and to the writing of religious poetry. She was also an admirer
of his genius, and came to Rome repeatedly to see him. To her his sonnets are addressed ; and they
all breathe a chaste and divine regard, unparalleled in any amatory poetry except that of Dante and
Petrarch. They are founded on the thought that beauty is the virtue of the body, as virtue is the
beauty of the soul ; that a beautiful person is sent into the world as an image of the divine beauty,
not to provoke but to purify the sensual into an intellectual and divine love. He enthrones his
mistress as a benignant angel, who is to refine and perfect his own character. Condivi, his friend,
has left this testimony ; " I have often heard Michael Angelo reason and discourse upon love, but
never heard him speak otherwise than upon platonic love. As for me, I am ignorant what Plato has
said upon this subject ; but this I know very well, that, in a long intimacy, I never heard from his
mouth a single word that was not perfectly decorous and having for its object to extinguish in youth
every improper desire, and that his own nature is a stranger to depravity." The poems themselves
cannot be read without awakening sentiments of virtue. An eloquent vindication of their philosophy
may be found in a paper by Signor Radici in the London " Retrospective Review," and, by the Italian
scholar, in the Discourse of Benedetto Varchi upon one sonnet of Michael Angelo, contained in the
volume of his poems published by Biagioli, from which, in substance, the views of Radici are taken.
Towards his end, there seems to have grown in him an invincible appetite of dying, for he knew that
his spirit could only enjoy contentment after death. So vehement was this desire that, he says, " my
soul can no longer be appeased by the wonted seductions of painting and sculpture." A fine
melancholy, not unrelieved by his habitual heroism, pervades his thoughts on this subject. At the
age of eighty years, he wrote to Vasari, sending him various spiritual sonnets he had written, and
tells him he " is at the end of his life, that he is careful where he bends his thoughts, that he sees it
is al-ready twenty-four o'clock, and no fancy arose in his mind but DEATH was sculptured on it." In
conversing upon this subject with one of his friends, that person remarked, that Michael might well
grieve that one who was incessant in his creative labors should have no restoration. " No," replied
Michael, " it is nothing ; for, if life pleases us, death, being a work of the same master, ought not to
displease us." But a nobler sentiment, uttered by him, is contained in his reply to a letter of Vasari,
who had informed him of the rejoicings made at the house of his nephew. Lionardo, at Florence,
over the birth of another Buonarotti. Michael admonishes him that " a man ought not to smile, when
all those around him weep ; and that we ought not to show that joy when a child is born, which
should be re-served for the death of one who has lived well."
Amidst all these witnesses to his independence, his generosity, his purity and his devotion, are we
not authorized to say that this man was penetrated with the love of the highest beauty, that is,
goodness ; that his was a soul so enamored of grace, that it could not stoop to meanness or
depravity ; that art was to him no means of livelihood or road to fame, but the end of living, as it
was the organ through which he sought to suggest lessons of an unutterable wisdom ; that here was
a man who lived to demonstrate that to the human faculties, on every hand, worlds of grandeur and
grace are opened, which no profane eye and no indolent eye can behold, but which to see and to
enjoy, demands the severest discipline of all the physical, intellectual and moral faculties of the
individual?
The city of Florence, on the river Arno, still treasures the fame of this man. There, his picture hangs
in every window ; there, the tradition of his opinions meets the traveller in every spot. " Do you see
that statue of St. George ? Michael Angelo asked it why it (lid not speak." - "Do you see this fine
church of Santa Maria Novella ? It is that which Michael Angelo called ' his bride." - " Look at these
bronze gates of the Baptistery, with their high reliefs, cast by Ghiberti five hundred years ago.
Michael Angelo said, " they were fit to be the gates of Paradise.' " - Here is the church, the palace,
the Laurentian library, he built. Here is his own house. In the church of Santa Croce are his mortal
remains. Whilst he was yet alive, he asked that he might be buried in that church, in such a spot
that the dome of the cathedral might be visible from his tomb when the doors of the church stood
open. And there and so is he laid. The innumerable pilgrims whom the genius of Italy draws to the
city, duly visit this church, which is to Florence what Westminster Abbey is to England. There, near
the tomb of Nicholas Machiavelli, the historian and philosopher; of Galileo, the great-hearted
astronomer ; of Boccaccio, and of Alfieri, stands the monument of Michael Angelo Buonarotti. Three
significant garlands are sculptured on the tomb ; they should be four, but that his countrymen
feared their own partiality. The forehead of the bust, esteemed a faithful likeness, is furrowed with
eight deep wrinkles one above another. The traveller from a distant continent, who gazes on that
marble brow, feels that he is not a stranger in the foreign church ; for the great name of Michael
Angelo sounds hospitably in his ear. He was not a citizen of any country ; he belonged to the human
race ; he was a brother and a friend to all who acknowledge the beauty that beams in universal
nature, and who seek by labor and sell-denial to approach its source in perfect goodness.