Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17000214
Defendant, MICHAEL THOMAS PAUL files this motion for rehearing and in support
1. Defendant’s character perceeved ggod will and standing in the community has
been defamed due to false testimony by the declarant of information given as fact from an
individual not present to be cross examined. While the court has some discretion in the
application of hearsay testimony which is provided within the guise of an official investigation
that is used to determine credibility of the person being investigated then used by the court as a
basis of truth weather the individual is being truthful in all his assertions of testimony to the
court. If it is provable under rehearing and by cross examination that the hearsay given as
testimony was in fact NOT GIVEN and a false statement made to the court to further the states
position, the entire testimony of the state’s witness must be stricken from the record and the
witness sanctioned for perjury for giving false testimony who will no longer have credibility with
2. Defendant will have present at the rehearing, the individual the state’s witness
has claimed provided specific information from a telephone call during the initial investigation
which was given as testimony regarding prior arrests for criminal activity in direct relation to the
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page
10206055v.1 120931/00041
current charge pending, as well as a statement that the individual was informing the State’s
witness during the same telephone call that defendant was providing false information to a police
officer who was conducting an investigation of a crime while the defendant was being detained.
3. Defendant had no availability to disprove the statements made in court during the
initial evidentiary hearing at the time which were not only blatantly false, but prejudiced the
court into believing that the defendant had not only committed the current charge which is a
crime but had been arrested before for the exact same charge giving the appearance of a habitual
violator with no standing as a public service organization registered with the Texas Secretary of
State under the Operations Code Chapter 18.003 because the registration is in the name of the
community emergency response team and not the defendant’s individual name . Defendant will
provide the accompanying letter that was mailed with the registration which is directly addressed
and titled to the defendant as the applicant and recipient of the authorization from the Texas
Secretary of State.
respectfully request that the Court grant this Motion for rehearing of the evidentiary ,proceedings
and reconsider the motion to dismiss for jurisdiction with prejudice, and for such other and
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page
10206055v.1 120931/00041
CAUSE NO. 17000214
reconsideration. Having considered the motion and argument of counsel, the court finds that the
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all named parties must appear in person
JUDGE PRESIDING
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Page
10206055v.1 120931/00041