Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JAMES
.\ND FLOYD 1-01. 7s
The formation of 5,5diphenplhydantoin by the condensation of benzyl with urea under the influence of ethanolic potas-
sium hydroxide involves a molecular rearrangement which has hitherto been considered t o be a pinacol rearrangement. An
investigation of the reaction conditions and the condensation of 4,4’-disubstituted b e n d s with urea leads us to the conclusion
that the rearrangement is that of the benzilic acid type, rather than the pinacol rearrangement. A number of new 5 3 4 -
(4-substituted phenyl)-hydantoins and 3a,6a-di-(4-substituted phenyl)-glycolurils were prepared.
The condensation of benzil and urea in ethanolic Analogous reactions7J in which urea and gly-
potassium hydroxide solution gives Xa,Ga-diphenyl- oxal were condensed gave corresponding 1,2-di-
glycoluril (I) and 5,5-diphenylhydantoin (11). hydroxy intermediates which rearranged to give
4 i 3
/4 3
0 A
I1
The formation of the hydantoin (11) involves a hydantoins. These reactions, however, were car-
molecular rearrangement in which a phenyl group ried out under acidic conditions.
undergoes a 1,2-shift and has been cited as an ex- Fisher, Ekeley and Ronziog report condensing
ample of the pinacol rearrangen~ent.~,~ I t was urea with phenylglyoxal and obtained 5-phenyl-4,li-
p r o p o ~ e d ,and
~ the view is still accepted,j that dihydroxy-2-imidazolone (111)
the reaction proceeds stepwise with the formation
of the intermediate 4,3-diphenyl-4,5-dihydroxy-2-
imidazolone (111) followed by a pinacol rearrange-
ment to the hydantoin (11).
HO-C-S
IV
HO-C--N
I H
€I
which rearranged under both alkaline and acidic
conditions t o give its corresponding hydantoin.
I No mention of further condensation to its glycoluril
0 was made.
The possibility of a benzilic acid rearrangement
in the condensation of benzil with urea was re-
I1 jected’” when it was found that benzilic acid and
;rea in alcoholic sodium hydroxide solution failed
To support this mechanism 111 was synthesized6 to produce 5,5diphenylhydantoin (11).
and found to rearrange t o I1 in alcoholic potassium
hydroxide solution. Condensation of 111with urea Discussion and Results
was found to result in the corresponding glycoluril In the exploratory stages of this work we studied
(1). the effect of varied reaction conditions on the rela-
However, I11 was never isolated as an inter- tive yields of 5,5diphenylhydantoin (11) and 3a,Ga-
mediate of the reaction between benzil and urea. diphenylglycoluril (I) from the condensation of
(1) Taken in part from the L\z.S. thesis of W. R . Dunnavant, Miami benzil with urea.
University, August, 1954. In a series of runs the molar ratio of bemil to
(2) Chemistry Research Branch, Aeronautical Research Lnbora- urea was varied from 1 : 1.05 to 1 :2.‘31 (Table I ) .
tory, Wright Air Development Center.
(3) H. R i l t z , B e y . , 41, 169 (1908).
From the results it appeared that the extent of 11y-
(4) C . W. Porter, “Xlolecular Rearrangements.” Chemical Catalog ( 7 ) I.. Ciemonsen, A H ~ Z3 3. ,3 , 102 (1904).
Co (Reinhold Piibl. Corp.), S e w Y o r k , S . T., 1828, p. 9G. (S) H. Pauly and 1%. Saute,, B s v . , 63, 2003 (1930).
( 5 ) E;. Hofmanu, “ltnidaiole and Its Derivative-, P a r t I , ” Inter- (9) H. Fisher, J . Ekeley a n d .4. Ronzio, TIIISJ O U R N A L , 54, -11 11;
science Publishers, Inc., New York, X. T., 1033, p. 230. (1832).
(6) H. Biltz Ber., 41, 172 (1908). (10) H. Biltz, Ber., 41, 138-1 (1808).
June 20, 19.515 CATALYZED
CONDENSATION
OF BENZILWITH UREA 2741
0
I
0 HS SH?
6+ 11 I
Ph-C -C--Ph + OH- + H 2 S C S H 2 + I>h-C-C--Ph + H20
II ,
IX
6-
0 -0
v
0
The rearrangement of V followed by ring closure would give the hydantoin VI (11)
0 0 0
I I 11
/\
HN KH2 HN NH? HX SH
v 1-11(11)
A second route to the hydantoin might be ring closure of Irto VI1 followed by rearrangement.
1
0 0 0 0
I
11
HN NH2 HN NH HS SH
- HS SH
1
--H+
I Ph 1 1
Ph-C-C-Ph + p---f Phd- C-Ph ~
$-C(Ph!.
1 I/ I - H - 1 1
-0 0 -0 011 -0 0- 0
1 1.1I 1I(II)
The glycoluril could be explained by a mechanism involving condensation of the second mole of
urea with V
0 0
0 I I
/c\ / c\
-
HS SHl HS SH
HK SH? 0 -0 Ph -2OH-
I
I'
Ph-C-C-Ph + H2r\'CNH2 Ph
1 1 H2S SH HX SH
-0 1 0 \C/ \C/
0 0
or by condensation of the second mole of urea with VII.
0
HS SH 0 HS SH
I I I1 -20H- I
Ph-C--C-Ph + H ~ S C S H I ---+ Ph-C---
I
C-Ph
June 20, 1956 CATALYZED
REACTION
OF ~ ~ D I C H L O R O E T HWITH
Y L ETHIOLS
NE 2743
of potassium hydroxide was used except for the variations and 0.017 mole of potassium hydroxide in 40 ml. of U.S.P.
stated in Tables I , I1 and 111. These materials were ethanol. They were refluxed for 2 hr. and then worked up
added to 40 ml. of U.S.P. ethanol and refluxed on a water- in the same manner as the reaction products of benzil and
bath for 2 hr. in a 150-1111. r.b. flask fitted with a reflux con- urea. The new products resulting are characterized in
denser. The hot reaction mixtures were then poured in Table V.
ice-water and the 3a,6a-diphenylglycolurils precipitated.
These precipitates were filtered onto tared filter papers and TABLE V
dried over calcium chloride in a desiccator for 2 days before hZ.p., Nitrogen,r0
Compound OC. Calcd. Found
weighing. The samples were then recrystallized from gla-
cial acetic acid. The first product obtained was analyzed 3a,6a-Di- (4-ethoxyphenyl) -gIycoluril 147-149 14.65 14.26
by nitrogen determination and subsequent products were 5,5-Di-(4-ethoxyphenyl) -hydantoin 195-198 8.23 8.21
characterized by their melting points. All samples melted 3a,Ga-Di-(4-bis-dimethyIaminophenyl) -
in the range 390-394". According to the literature3 3a,6a- glycoluril 199-201 22.09 22.01
diphenylglycoluril fails to melt a t 330". 3a,Ga-Di-(4-acetamidophenyl) -glycoluril 237-239 20.51 20.50
3a,Ga-Di-(4-phenoxyphenyl) -glycoluril 2 15-2 17 11.71 10.08
Anal. Calcd. for C16Hl4O2S4: N, 19.09. Found: N,
5,5-Di-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-hydantoin 182-185 6.43 6.27
18.70. 5,b-Di- (4-chlorophenyl) -hydantoin 226-230 8.83 8.81
The filtrates from the glycoluril filtrations were then 3a,6a-Di-(4-chlorophenyl)-glycoluril 285-287 15.43 15.43
acidified with concentrated hydrochloric acid and the 5,5-
diphenylhydantoins were precipitated. These were iso- Rearrangement of I11 to I1 in Acidic Solution.-4,5-Di-
lated and dried as above. The samples were recrystallized phenyl-4,5-dihydroxy-2-imidazolone(111) was prepared
from ethanol. The identities of the products were checked by the method of Breur and Zincke.'g The material melte?
in the same manner as were the glycolurils. All samples a t 169-170". The literature decomposition pointI8 is 170 .
melted in the range 289-293". The literature m.p. of 5,5- One gram of I11 was added to 30 ml. of U.S.P. ethanol
diphenylhydantoin is given as 293' .I7 containing 1 ml. of concentrated sulfuric acid. The mix-
Attempted Condensation of Benzil with Urea in Neutral ture was thoroughly mixed and refluxed for 2 hr. on a water-
Solution.--dn identical reaction to those previous was run bath. Upon pouring into cold water a precipitate of I1
except that no alkali was added. Addition of water to the formed weighing 0.32 g. (3470) which, after recrystalliza-
reaction mixture produced a light yellow precipitate of fine tion from ethanol, decomposed a t 169-170".
needle-like crystals weighing 1.94 g. and melting a t 93-95', Attempted Rearrangement of I11 in Neutral Solution.-
which was identical with the starting benzil. The same procedure as above was carried out using 0.5 g.
Attempted Condensation of Benzil with Urea in Acidic of I11 and omitting the acid. Upon pouring the reaction
Solution.-Another identical reaction was run except that mixture into cold water, a white flocculent precipitate
1 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid was substituted for formed weighing 0.48 g. and melting a t 200' (111).
the potassium hydroxide. Addition of water brought down
a light yellow precipitate weighing 1.98 g. which melted a t Acknowledgment.-We are indebted to A. L.
94-96', again unreacted benzil. Ippolito for the preparation of the 4,4'-disubsti-
Condensation of 4,4'-Disubstituted Benzils with Urea.- tuted benzils and to Miami University for financial
All of the benzils listed in Table IV were refluxed with urea assistance in conducting this study,
and ethanolic potassium hydroxide. Reaction mixtures
consisted of 0.095 mole of the benzil, 0.016 mole of urea OXFORD, OHIO
(17) H. Biltz, A n n . , 368, 243 (1909). (18) A. B r e w a n d T. Zincke, i b i d . , 198 151 11879).
potassium s ~ l f i t e ,while
~ the trans isomer, when c1ic=\,, ArS/C=C\\s*r
treated likewise, is recovered unchanged. I Ar = p-tolyl v
The detailed mechanisms of the reactions of nu- Three important observations bearing on the
cleophilic agents with the dichloroethylenes were mechanism of this reaction are (a) trans-dichloro-
(1) This paper was presented in p a r t before the Division of Organic ethylene does not react, (b) sodium ethoxide is nec-
Chemistry a t the Fall 1955 Meeting of t h e American Chemical Society
in Minneapolis, Minn. Abstracted in p a r t from t h e Ph.D. Thesis of
essary in order for any reaction to occur and (c)
Max A I . Boudakian and from t h e M.S. Thesis of Richard F. Heine. the final product has exclusively the cis structure.
(2) W. E. Truce and R. J. McManimie, THISJ O U R N A L , 7 6 , 5745 The following three mechanisms were considered
(1954). for the conversion of cis-dichloroethylene (I) to
(3) W .E. Parham and J . Heberling, ibid., 7 7 , 1175 (1955). cis-bis-(ary1mercapto)-ethene(V).
(4) H.1. Backer and J . Strating, K e c . fro?. chim., 73, 565 (1954).
( 5 ) W. 13. Truce and &I. M , Boudakian, THISJ U U R N A L , 78, 2752 A. Nucleophilic Displacement Mechanism.-
flFl5I'b) One possible reaction path is an SK." process