Summary of the comments

Select/deselect the summary filter to see comments.

Disclaimer: The experts contributed to this consultation in his/her persoanl capacity. The
views expressed here are his/her own and do not necessarily represent the views of the
affiliated organisation.

S. No. Name Organisation Type of Organisation Summary

1 Esther Adams Proyecto Mirador Project Developer Summary

2 James Jetter Environment Protection Regulatory Agency Summary

Agency (EPA) USA
3 Keshav C Das SNV NGO Summary

4 Daniel Wulbern Orbis Development Partners Project Developer Summary

5 Nick marshall Envirofit International Manufacturer / Project Summary

developer

6 Peter Chant FreMco Project Developer Summary

7 Eric Keogh Impact Global Emission Project Developer / Summary

Solutions Consultant
8 Matt Sannagle DelAgua Health Rwanda Project Developer Summary

9 Evan Hagler Impact Carbon Project Developer Summary

10 Micahel Johnson Berkeley Air Monitoring Group Research Institute Summary

11 David Pennise Berkeley Air Monitoring Group Research Institute Summary

12 Micahel Lazarus Stockhom Environment Research Institute Summary

Institute - US

13, 14, Gary Kleiman, Eduardo Ferreira, World Bank Policy Summary
15, 16 Megan Meyer
17 Susan Anenberg Black Carbon Expert - Regulatory Agency Summary
Independent (Previously)

18 Christine wiedinmyer National Center for Research Institute Summary

Atmospheric Research,
Aerosol Chemistry
19 Bella Roscher WWF Policy and Project developSummary
Scope Expansion Key Issues
Yes No Comment

Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #

GWP_20 vs GWP_100
No Comment # Cooling vs warming issue
# Type of fuel impact on
BC
Yes No Comment

No # CO2_GWP vs BC_GWP

Yes No Comment

Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #

GWP_20 vs GWP_100
Yes # Cooling vs Warming Issue #
Technology and usage impact on BC/OC ration
#
GWP_100 #
Consistency with other GHGs

Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #

GWP_100 #
Consistency with other GHGs
Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #
GWP_20 vs GWP_100
Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #
GWP_20 vs GWP_100 #
Fuel type & production
Yes # Cooling vs warming issue #
GWP_20 vs GWP_100 #
Technology/fuel impact
Yes, # Cooling vs Warming Issue
# GWP_100
# Consistency
and transparency between BC and CO2 credits
Yes # Cooling vs Warming Issue #
Technology and usage impact on BC/OC ration
#
GWP_100 #
Consistency with other GHGs

Yes # Cooling vs Warming Issue #

Technology and usage impact on BC/OC ration

No Comment # GWP 100 vs 20 # Carbon Neutrality #

BC/OC ratio #
Net Warming Impact
# Technology and usage impact on BC/OC
ration
Risks/Safeguards Alternative Mechanism
Monitoring & cookstove testing No comment

No Comment # Test protocols/standards/labeling

# Complex methodology No comment

No Comment No Comment

# Risk of “real, measurable and verifiable” No Comment

emission reduction #
Risk of additional supply that does not lead to
additional activities.

No Comment No Comment

# BC/OC inclusion # No comment

Monitoring & Testing for BC-OC

# Monitoring & Testing for BC-OC # No comment

Risk of GS credit reputation

# Monitoring # No Comment

# Monitoring # No Comment

# Uncertainties around BC Life, impact, net

warming impact and monitoring

# Uncertainties due to short lifetime, Global vs # No Comment

regional impact, Net impact accounting for co-
emitted species (cooling vs warming effect)
Global vs regional impact, Net impact New assesst class
accounting for co-emitted species (cooling vs
warming effect)

Global vs regional impact, Net impact New assesst class

accounting for co-emitted species (cooling vs
warming effect)
# Threshold level for consideration as a clean No comment
cookstove
Impact on voluntary market Suggestions
Risk of over supply of GS credits Cookstove based default factor shall be
provided.
No comment # Elemental Carbon based monitoring
# Terminology shall be carefully defined
No comment No comment

No Comment # Inclusion of BC component in microscale

cookstove methodology
# Risk of over supply of GS credits No Comment

No comment # Expansion to other technologies/ Sector as

well.
No comment # Expansion to other technologies/Sectors as
well.
# Risk of over supply of GS credits # Adjustment of negative crediting #
Support for building demand

# Risk of over supply of GS credits # Standardised methodology approach

# Risk of over supply of GS credits # Shall account the ongoing development work
on Black Carbon for example EPA
# Risk of over supply of GS credits # Shall account the ongoing development work
on Black Carbon for example EPA

# Risk of over supply of GS credits # Shall provide more comprehensive information

for research community

# Risk of over supply of GS credits # BC shall not be accounte din isolation #

Monitoring shall ensure the reduction are real,
measurable and verifiable, however the
monitoring approach shall also be simplified
enough to implement.
No comment # Monitoring is critical element, however
monitoring approaches are not establsihed. The
Proejct surya monitoring methodology can only
work BC but not other species of the mix.

No comment # GS should account the impact of fuel

processing stage on BC emission, if other fuelis
allowed.
No comment # Is the methodology proposed for other short-
lived climate forcers as well, i.e. why only BC ?