Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE 3 TABLE 7
Ratio 1.25:1
Ratio 2:1
Temperature % RSH removal
Temperature % H25 removal 15
27° C. 58.4%
27° C. 29%
38° C. 64.9%
38° C. 37%
50° C. 65.6%
120° C. 49%
20
TABLE 4 TABLE 8
Ratio 2.5:1
Ratio 4:1
Temperature % RSH removal
Temperature % H25 removal 25
27° C. 64.4%
27° C. 76%
38° C. 68.5%
38° C. 78%
50° C. 70.4%
120° C. 94%
30
TABLE 5 TABLE 9
Ratio 5:1
Ratio 5:1
Temperature % RSH removal
Temperature % H25 removal 35
27° C. 69.8%
27° C. 100%
38° C. N/A
380 C. 100%
50° C. 74.6%
1200 C. 100%
EXAMPLE 5
TABLE 6
Ratio % RSH removal
To further illustrate the advantageous use of a scavenger
1.25:1 58.4% 60
2.5:1 64.4% containing both hydrogen sul?de and mercaptan scavenger
5:1 69.8% components, the same LCCG feed Was treated, at ambient
10:1 71.4% conditions using: only HZS scavenger (triaZine), then only
mercaptan scavenger (bis-(isopropylacetate)-aZo
As shoWn, alkyl-carboxyl-aZo compound provides reduc- 65 compound), and then both scavengers sequentially using
tion in RSH levels With gradual increase in removal at higher HZS scavenger ?rst followed by mercaptan scavenger.
ratios. Tables 11—12 beloW set forth the results obtained.
6,063,346
8
What is claimed is:
TABLE 11 1. A process for scavenging hydrogen sul?de and mer
Ratio % H25 Removal % RSH Removal
captan contaminants from a ?uid, comprising the steps of: