You are on page 1of 12

Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Ocean Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng

Study of environment friendly porous suspended breakwater for the


Egyptian Northwestern Coast
Bahaa Elsharnouby a, Akram Soliman b,c,n, Mohamed Elnaggar a, Mohamed Elshahat a
a
Ports and Marine Structures, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
b
Ports and Coastal Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria, Egypt
c
Port Training Institute, Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria, Egypt

a r t i c l e i n f o abstract

Article history: A proposed new type of breakwater used for the Egyptian Northwestern Coast is presented and
Received 9 April 2011 evaluated. The new model consists of double porous curtain walls fixed on two rows of vertical piles.
Accepted 12 March 2012 The curtain walls consist of two sets of horizontal steel strips with equal spacing. The piles are in two
Editor-in-Chief: A.I. Incecik
rows with spacing in the two directions. The spaces between the steel strips and the piles allow for
Available online 23 April 2012
good transmission of water and sediment with a favorable dissipation of wave energy. The North-
Keywords: western Coast of Egypt is an ideal location for the application of this new type of breakwater due to its
Curtain wall pile breakwaters sudden steep slope, wave breaking near the shore, strong rip currents and huge amount of sediment
Egyptian Northwestern Coast transport.
Numerical wave flume
A calibration has been implemented using a set of laboratory results. A parametric study has been
Transmission coefficient
conducted in order to introduce the best configuration of the new model. Real shore and sea data for
several locations were applied and theoretical analysis has shown that the suspended breakwater leads
to energy dissipation of incident wave energy and provides a quite safe surf zone for swimmers and
human activity with minimum changes to the shoreline.
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Rubble mound breakwaters (emerged type) were adapted in


several locations for protection against wave action. These break-
The Northwestern Coast of Egypt stretches along 525 km on waters block natural sediment and water movement causing
the Mediterranean Sea, west of Alexandria city. This promising accretion accumulation just behind the breakwater and severe
region has attracted many touristic projects with massive invest- erosion in neighboring beaches. In addition, they prevent the
ments. Most of these projects are resorts, hotels, and touristic circulation of water yielding a deterioration of water quality
villages for recreation and swimming purposes. Unfortunately, within the protected area. In some places, they obstruct the
most of those areas along the Northwestern Coast are not suitable passage of fishes and bottom dwelling organisms. These negative
for safe swimming due to breaking waves near the shore and side effects may be due to inadequate design procedures, mis-
strong rip currents. Although sediment movement is quite large understanding of marine processes and coastal ecosystem beha-
and wave attack is considerably strong, the shoreline is consid- vior, and neglecting the implementation of Environmental Impact
ered stable over the period of years and does not suffer from Assessment (EIA) (Frihy, 2001). On the other hand, there are some
natural erosion or accretion. cases around the world where the implementation of the rubble
Traditional shore protection structures along the Northwestern mound emerged breakwaters provides good protection with less
Coast of Egypt have yielded quite adverse effects. One paralleled adverse effects, i.e., the group of parallel breakwaters fronting the
breakwater at Krir resort has been demolished and removed due to eastern half of Grand Isle, Louisiana, USA. Examination of aerial
its complete failure in shore stabilization. photography indicated that at Grand Isle little or no shoreline
realignment took place following breakwater construction with
no evidence of salient or tombolo formation (Edwards, 2006).
n
Corresponding author at: College of Engineering and Technology, Arab Acad- Submerged breakwaters may be a better alternative. For quite
emy for Science and Technology and Maritime Transport, P.O. 1029, Abo Keer, small surf zone, distance between the submerged breakwater and
Alexandria, Egypt. the shoreline may not be adequate for wave attenuation, in which
Tel.: þ2 100 170 8865; fax: þ2 03 482 9930.
case submerged breakwaters may not perform property.
E-mail addresses: bahaa.elsharnouby@yahoo.com (B. Elsharnouby),
akram.soliman@pti-aast.org (A. Soliman), naggarmo@gmail.com (M. Elnaggar), Floating breakwaters remain a good choice for those zones.
me.ouda@gmail.com (M. Elshahat). These floating breakwaters with several shapes and types have

0029-8018/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.03.012
48 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

List of Symbols p Atmospheric pressure [N/m2]


S Pile spacing in Y-direction [m]
A Wave amplitude [m] T Wave period [s]
B Body force vector [NXm2] V Vertical strip spacing [m]
H Wave height [m] W Single strip width [m]
d Water depth [m] l Wave length [m]
D Pile diameter [m] m Molecular (dynamic) viscosity [kg/m s.]
G Pile spacing in X-direction [m] r Mass density of the fluid [kg/m3]
h Total strips height [m] t Molecular viscosity stress tensor [N/m2]
Hi Incident wave height [m] o Wave frequency [rad/s]
Ht Transmitted wave height [m] n Velocity vector [m/s.]
k Wave number ( ¼2p/l) [1/m] r Gradient operator [Dimensionless]
Kt Transmission coefficient [Dimensionless]

been introduced by several researchers in the last few years. regression analysis against the numerical model output. Section 4
There are two main categories of floating breakwaters according presents the application of the proposed breakwater at two zones on
to their installation system: the Egyptian Northwestern Coast. Finally, conclusions are presented
in Section 5.
 Moored floating breakwaters (Anchored by chains or cables).
 Floating breakwaters supported on rows of pile.
2. Double curtain wall on piles system model

Moored floating breakwaters have many configurations and The proposed Double Curtain wall on piles system (DCWPS) is
types, such as rectangular pontoon, single tube and multiple shown in Fig. 1.
tubes. Floating breakwaters restrained by piles are also known The new model consists of:
as Curtain Wall Pile breakwater (CWP) or porous suspended wave
barriers.  Two rows of vertical circular piles.
Several researchers have conducted theoretical and experi-  Two sets of horizontal strips (front and rear) each set fixed on
mental studies on the hydraulic characteristics of CWP break- one row of piles.
waters. Table 1 shows some of these previous studies (Rageh and
Koraim, 2010). Both piles and strip curtains are working as a breakwater and
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the new wave dissipation resulting from the whole system. The curtain
layout of a CWP breakwater. The performance and wave interaction wall can be adjusted according to the performance.
with a double curtain wall strips breakwater supported on piles has The horizontal axe of the strips is located at the sea mean level;
been studied numerically in Section 3; the performance is described the strips extend up and down the sea level for a distance close to one
in terms of transmission coefficients. A Computational Fluid half of its total height. The curtain is facing the most concentrating
Dynamics (CFD) model, which has been set up using Flow-3D area of wave energy, and doubling of the curtain tends to increase the
numerical model, has been used. The model verification has been energy dissipation by anti-phase equal to a thickness of one strip.
based on previous experimental lab model studies. This section Spaces between piles and strips allow sediments and water
concludes with a discussion of the results and a proposed design to pass through the structure. The new system is expected to
curves for Double Curtain Wall on Piles System (DCWPS) based on a have minimum effect on the sediment transport and shoreline

Table 1
Literature review of curtain wall pile breakwaters (Rageh and Koraim, 2010).

Reference Structure type Theoretical model Experiment facilities

Koftis et al. (2006) Vertical semi-immersed slotted barrier Reynolds average Navier–Stokes equation. Flume with dim.
(RANS) 20  0.62  1.0 m.
Rageh et al. (2009) Semi immersed pontoon supported on piles – Flume with dim.
12  0.3  0.45 m.
Krishnakumar et al. (2008) Partially submerged slotted wave screens Boundary integral equation Flume with dim.
72.5  2  2.7 m.
Suh et al. (2007) Pile-supported vertical single wall (circular piles) Eigen function expansion Flume with dim.
104  3.7  4.6 m.
Laju et al. (2007) Pile-supported vertical double walls (circular piles) Eigen function expansion Flume with dim.
72.5  2  2.7 m.
Huang (2007) Single and double thin, vertical, slotted barriers Eigen function expansion Flume with dim.
12  0.3  0.5 m.
Suh et al. (2006) Pile-supported vertical single wall (square piles) Eigen function expansion Flume with dim.
104  3.7  4.6 m.
Koraim (2005) Single and double rows of vertical circular and square Eigen function expansion Flume with dim.
piles 15  0.3  0.5 m.
Sundar (2002) Quadrant front face pile supported breakwater – Flume with dim.
72.5  2  2.7 m.
Abdel-Mawla and Balah, Thin, vertical and sloped slotted double and triple – Flume with dim.
(2001) barriers 13  0.3  0.5 m.
B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58 49

Fig. 1. Sketch explains the components of the proposed model.

morphology. It is expected from the new system to provide a good where r is the mass density of the fluid, n is the velocity vector
water circulation. and r is the gradient operator. S on the right side of the equation
represents the sources and sinks.
In the absence of mass sources and for incompressible flows,
the mass conservation equation reduces the divergence of the
3. Numerical model
velocity as follows:

3.1. Theory overview r:v ¼ 0 ð2Þ


The momentum transport equation for the average flow field is:
Flow-3D is a general purpose computational fluid dynamics  
(CFD) package. It employs specially developed numerical techni- @v
r þ v:rv ¼ rpr:t þ B ð3Þ
ques to solve the equations of motion for fluids to obtain @t
transient, three-dimensional solutions to multi-scale, multi-phy- here, B is the body force vector, t is the viscous stress tensor and
sics flow problems. The equations of motion are solved by the p is the pressure. The momentum transport equation for the
method of finite volume/finite differences in a Cartesian, stag- fluid continuum reduced to the Navier–Stokes equations for
gered grid. An array of physical and numerical options allows Newtonian fluids for which stress is linearly proportional to
users to apply Flow-3D to a wide variety of fluid flow and heat strain. For an incompressible fluid with constant viscosity, the
transfer phenomena (Hirt and Nichols, 2007). The gravity option Navier–Stokes equations can be written as follows:
was activated with gravitational acceleration, set to 9.81 [m/s2].  
The viscosity and turbulence options were also activated with @v 2
r þ v:rv ¼ rp þ mr v þ B ð4Þ
Newtonian viscosity being applied to the flow along with the @t
selection of an appropriate turbulence model. Once the Flow-3D where m is the molecular (dynamic) viscosity.
model was completely prepared, some selected simulations were
performed with different activated turbulence models. The results
3.3. Meshing and geometry
showed that there were only minimal differences in the data of
interest in this study between the applied turbulence models,
The geometry used in the simulations was drawn in Auto CAD
provided that the more advanced 2-equation (k–e or RNG) or
and exported in a stereo lithographic (stl) format. The stl images
Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models were selected. Based upon
were then directly imported into Flow-3D where the appropriate
these results, the decision was taken to use the Renormalization
mesh could be generated. In a CFD numerical model, a mesh is a
Group (RNG) turbulence model for all simulations. Furthermore
subdivision of the flow domain into relatively small regions called
based on comments in the Flow-3D user’s manual (2007) that the
cells, in which numerical values such as velocity and pressure are
RNG turbulence model was elected as the most accurate and
computed. Determining the appropriate mesh domain along with
robust model available in the software.
a suitable mesh cell size is a critical part of any numerical model
simulation. Mesh and cell size can affect both the accuracy of the
results and the simulation time. Therefore, it is important to
3.2. Governing equation
minimize the amount of cells while including enough resolution
to capture the important features of the geometry as well as
For a fluid continuum, governing equations are derived from
sufficient flow details. For these reasons, multi-block mesh was
the conservation laws for mass, momentum and energy. The mass
used in the simulations, where the coarse grids were used at the
conservation equation is:
areas in the computational domain with less geometric details,
@ and the grid getting finer near more geometric complexity as
r þ r:ðrvÞ ¼ S ð1Þ
@t shown in Fig. 2.
50 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

Fig. 2. Arrangement of multi-block mesh in the computational domain.

3.4. Boundary and initial conditions

Setting the appropriate boundary conditions has a major


impact on whether the numerical model results are reflecting or
not the actual situation being simulated. In our problem we
specified a linear wave boundary condition at the upstream
boundary, and an outflow boundary condition at the downstream
boundary. All other open boundaries were specified as symmetric.
The linear wave theory has been used in Flow-3D; the linear
wave was assumed to come from a flat bottom reservoir into the
computational domain. A linear wave is characterized by the
wave amplitude (A), wavelength (l), wave frequency (o) and Fig. 3. Definition of transmission coefficient (Kt).
wave number (k¼2p/l).

3.5. Design characteristics for the new breakwater model simulations have been conducted using the numerical model. The
comparison between the numerical model results and the experi-
The performance of the proposed system has been investigated mental results is shown in Fig. 5. The figure shows that there is a
through a parametric study to determine the design character- good concurrence between numerical and experimental results.
istics. The performance is described in terms of the transmission However, the differences between the numerical and laboratory
coefficient (Kt), as shown in Fig. 3, data could be due to the scale effects, the finite duration of both
numerical simulation time and laboratory test time, and the
Ht
Kt ¼ ð5Þ uncertainty in laboratory work, as well as numerical rounding
Hi
errors in the computational model.
where: Ht ¼transmitted wave height and Hi ¼incident wave
height. 3.7. Numerical simulations
Fig. 4 shows the design characteristics that affect the break-
water efficiency in terms of the value of transmission coefficient A number of numerical simulations have been performed to
(Kt). These design characteristics are as follows: study the influence of the design characteristic in the transmis-
sion coefficient as shown in . These curves were plotted using the
– D ¼Pile diameter. basis of Polynomials least square curve fitting method. This
– W¼Strip width. method assumes that the best-fit curve of a given type is the
– G ¼Pile spacing in X-direction. curve that has the minimal sum of the deviations squared (least
– h¼Total strip height. square error) for a given set of data.
– V¼Strip vertical spacing. Fig. 6 presents the relation between the transmission coeffi-
– S¼Pile spacing in Y-direction. cient (Kt) and dimensionless pile spacing (S/D) for different values
of pile diameter (D). Seventy eight numerical simulations had
Parameters effects were tested through a set of numerical been performed. The values of strip width (W) ¼0.12 m, strip
simulations. Parameters ranges used in the model are listed in vertical spacing (V)¼ 0.12 m and pile spacing in X-direction
Table 2. (G)¼ 3.0 m. The transmission coefficient and dimensionless pile
spacing are directly proportional. Fig. 6 shows that values of (Kt)
3.6. Numerical model calibration are greater than 0.4 at (S/D) greater than 3.
Figs. 7 and 8 presented the relation between transmission
In order to calibrate the Flow-3D numerical model, for model- coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different
ing the interaction between the DCWPS and the incident waves, a values of strip width (W). Seventy numerical simulations had
range of experimental data was selected. These experiments were been conducted. The values of pile spacing in Y-direction (S)¼1.0
conducted by Rageh et al. (2009). The used model consists of an and 2.0 m, pile diameter (D) ¼0.2 and 0.40 m and pile spacing in
immersed pontoon with width (B) and draft (Dp) resting on two X-direction (G) ¼3.0 m. The transmission coefficient and dimen-
rows of vertical piles with diameter (D) and spacing (G), (S) sionless strip spacing are directly proportional. It can be seen
in X and Y directions, respectively. A number of 12 numerical from Fig. 7 that the values of the (Kt) are greater than 0.3 at (V/W)
B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58 51

Fig. 4. Governing design characteristics for DCWP breakwater.

Table 2
Numerical setup parameters for DCWP breakwater models.

Parameter Dimension Values Notes

Water depth (d) Meter 3.0 At the structure site


Wave periods (T) Second 6.0
Wave height (Hi) Meter 2.0 At depth¼ 6.0 m
Distance between the structure and shore line. Meter 80, 70
Pile diameter (D) Meter 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.50
Pile spacing in X-direction (G) Meter 3.0
Pile spacing in Y-direction (S) Meter 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.0, 1.20, 1.40, 1.60, 1.80, 2.0, 2.20, 2.50
Strip width (W) Meter 0.10, 0.12, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25
Strip vertical spacing (V) Meter 0,.05, 0.10, 0.12, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50
Total strips height (h) Meter 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.50, 5.0

Fig. 5. Comparison between the numerical results and experimental data for the transmission coefficient (Kt).

greater than 0.5 while Fig. 8 shows that the values of (Kt) are nineteen numerical simulations had been conducted. The values
greater than 0.4 at (V/W) greater than 0.5. of pile spacing in Y-direction (S)¼1.0 and 2.0 m, pile diameter
Figs. 9 and 10 presented the relation between transmission (D) ¼0.2 and 0.40 m and pile spacing in X-direction (G)¼3.0 m.
coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different It can be seen from Figs. 9 and 10 that the values of (Kt) are
values of total strip height (h). In these figures one hundred and greater than 0.2 at (V/W) greater than 0.5.
52 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

Fig. 6. The relation between the transmission coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless pile spacing (S/D) for different values of pile diameter (W¼ 0.12 m, V¼ 0.12 m and
G ¼3.0 m).

Fig. 7. The relation between the transmission coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different values of strip width (S¼ 1.0 m, D ¼0.20 m and G ¼ 3.0 m).

Fig. 8. The relation between transmission coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different values of strip width (S ¼2.0 m, D ¼ 0.40 m and G ¼3.0 m).
B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58 53

Fig. 9. The relation between the transmission coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different values of total strip height (S ¼1.0 m, D ¼ 0.20 m and
G ¼ 3.0 m).

Fig. 10. The relation between the transmission coefficient (Kt) and dimensionless strip spacing (V/W) for different values of total strip height (S¼2.0 m, D¼ 0.40 m and G¼3.0 m).

Figs. 6 and 10 can be used to determine preliminary design From Fig. 9: V/W ratio¼1.0, then the total strip height
characteristics of DCWP breakwater for specific transmission coeffi- (h)¼1.08 m.
cient values (Kt). These characteristics are also dependent on eco-
nomical aspects, field bathymetry, available pile diameters and the
required efficiency. It is recommended to apply more detailed
parametric study and a physical modeling for complete design 4. Case study of Northwestern of Egypt
scheme.
As an example, the following steps can be applied to deter- 4.1. Overview
mine the DCWP breakwater dimensions using the design curves
Figs. 6 and 9: The Northwestern Coast of Egypt is a typical area to use the
Assume the following data: new structure along its shore. In this area the bed slope is very
steep, waves are breaking near the shore line and rip currents are
J Strip width (W) ¼0.12 m quite dangerous. These conditions make swimming along most of
J Vertical strip spacing (V)¼0.12 m northern coast very risky.
J Pile spacing in X-direction (G) ¼3.0 m Various emerged breakwaters have been implemented to solve
J Transmission coefficient (Kt) ¼0.53 m this problem, but they have produced adverse results. An example
J Pile diameter (D)¼0.2 m. of these structures is the group of emerged detached breakwaters
constructed at Palm Beach, 21 km west of Alexandria. The break-
From Fig. 6: S/D ratio ¼5.0, then the pile spacing in Y-direction waters blocked most of the sediments and water movement
(S) ¼1.0 m. yielding accumulated accretion at the protected area and severe
54 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

erosion at neighboring areas as shown in Fig. 11, in addition to zones have been selected: the first zone is Nice 1 resort located
deterioration of water quality behind the breakwater. 65 km west of Alexandria and the second is Nice 5 resort located
10 km after Nice 1 resort. Topography and bathymetry surveys have
4.2. Study areas been conducted for these two areas. Data of waves, currents and
tides were collected. Fig. 12 shows the bathymetries of the two
To test suitability of using DCWPS as an environment friendly locations. Fig. 13 shows cross shore sections in the two bathymetries
partial shore protection system for the Northwestern Coast, two illustrating the sudden steep slope in the sea bed, with a small surf

Fig. 11. Salient formation behind detached breakwater at Palm Beach.

Fig. 12. Bathymetry map for Nice 1 resort (left) and Nice 5 resort (right).
B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58 55

Fig. 13. Cross shore sections at the Nice 1 and Nice 5 resorts, respectively.

zone particularly at Nice 5 resort. This sudden change leads to wave


breaking near the shoreline.
The wave data collected at the Northwestern Coast of Egypt has
given preliminary indications that the DCWPS may be a suitable
alternative for this region. Floating Breakwaters can effectively
attenuate moderate wave heights in a range of 2.0 m (Tsinker,
1995), while the wave height of more than 2 m occurs only 9.7% of
the time at Northwestern Coast area (Farouk, 2010). The practical
upper limit for the design wave period lies in the range of 4–6 s for
the floating breakwaters (Tsinker, 1995), while the mean wave
period at Northwestern Coast area is 4.7 s (Farouk, 2010).
The wave and current characteristics which have been used in
the numerical simulation are as follows (Farouk, 2010).
Wave height ¼2.0 m at water depth¼6.0 m.
Wave period¼6.0 s.
Current speed ¼0.30 m/s.

4.3. Proposed structure dimensions and layout Fig. 14. Proposed structure layout.

In this study, the transmission coefficient (Kt) has been


assumed to be between 0.40 and 0.70 in the lee of the DCWP
breakwater. The proposed structure dimensions and layout has A comparison between water free surface before and after the
been determined using the design curves (Figs. 6–10). construction of the new proposed breakwater at Nice 5 resort is
The layout of the protection system is shown in Fig. 14, and the presented in Fig. 15. It can be seen from the figure that the wave
proposed structure dimensions are: heights have decreased due to the construction of the new
breakwater.
– Pile diameter (D)¼0.40 m The same results can also be noticed from Figs. 16 and 17
– Pile spacing in X-direction (G) ¼3.0 m which present the changes in water free surface profile due to the
– Pile spacing in Y-direction (S) ¼2.0 m presence of DCWPS at Nice 5 resort.
– Strip width (W) ¼0.2 m The same has been performed for Nice 1 resort; a comparison
– Strip vertical spacing (V) ¼0.10 m between water free surface before and after the construction of
– Total strips height (h)¼2.0 m. the new proposed breakwater at Nice1 resort is presented in
Fig. 18. It can be seen also from the figure that the wave heights
4.4. Breakwater response have decreased due to the construction of the new breakwater.
The same results can be noticed again from Figs. 19 and 20
The numerical model has been used to study the effects of which present the changes in water free surface profile due to the
DCWPS breakwater on wave heights at Nice 1 and Nice 5 resorts. presence of DCWPS at Nice 1 resort.
56 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

Fig. 15. Snapshots of the free surface profile before and after the constructions of DCWPS at Nice 5 resort.

Fig. 16. Water free surface changes due to presence of DCWPS at Nice 5 (fitted curve).

Fig. 17. Water free surface changes due to presence of DCWPS at Nice 5 (a zoomed view at the lee side portion).

5. Conclusion and sediments move in large quantities. Any complete or random


partially obstruction to these phenomena may lead to quite
Shore protection structures are usually associated with adverse results.
adverse environmental side effects. Water quality deterioration, To provide safe shelter for swimmers and recreational activity
instability of shoreline (accretion behind the structure and ero- along the Northwestern Coast of Egypt without adverse side
sion at neighboring areas), loss of balanced marine environment, effects, a new type of suspended breakwater is presented.
and sea view obstruction are the main environmental side effects The new model consists of double porous curtain walls fixed
of shore protection structures. on two rows of piles. The double system (porous striped walls and
Submerged breakwaters alleviate many of these adverse rows of piles) absorbs wave energy by enforcing water to pass
results and provide better environmental atmosphere. In shore through pile spacing and voids between horizontal strips. Mean-
areas where the sea bed has sudden steep slope associated with while, sediments move almost freely through piles spacing. The
quite small surf zones (like the Northwestern Coast of Egypt), the horizontal strips are located at the surface wave level. Waves
waves break near the shore, strong rip currents are developed, restore their motion after passing through the breakwater system,
B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58 57

Fig. 18. Snapshots of the free surface profile before and after the constructions of DCWPS at Nice 1 resort.

Fig. 19. Water free surface changes due to presence of DCWPS at Nice 1 (fitted curve).

Fig. 20. Water free surface changes due to presence of DCWPS at Nice 1 (a zoomed view at the lee side portion).

but with noticeable reduction in their heights and energy, causing Egypt. Design curves and charts are presented for the detailed
no rip current. design of the new system. The dimensions of the strips and
The model was theoretically analyzed using real wave data spacing between them can be adjusted any time after the
and bathymetry of two locations along the Northwestern Coast of construction in order to adapt the system efficiency according
58 B. Elsharnouby et al. / Ocean Engineering 48 (2012) 47–58

to any change of climate. The results show that the wave height Hirt, C., Nichols, B., 2007. Flow-3D User’s Manual. Flow Science Inc.
has decreased after the breakwater. Huang, Z., 2007. Wave interaction with one or two rows of closely spaced
rectangular cylinders. Ocean Eng. 34 (11-12), 1584–1591.
More validation to the proposed breakwater is still needed Koftis, T., Prinos, P., Koutandos, E., 2006. 2D-V hydrodynamics of wave-floating
using physical models and/or numerical wave flume before breakwater interaction. J. Hydraul. Res. 44 (4), 451–469.
starting its implementation in Egyptian Northwestern Coast. Koraim, A., 2005 Suggested model for the protection of shores and marina. A
The new model provides an environment friendly partial Thesis Submitted for Partial Fulfillment of Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Civil
Eng., Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
shore protection without adverse side effect. The breakwater Krishnakumar, C., Balaji, R., Sannasiraj, S., Sundar, V., 2008. Reflection and
can easily be adjusted after construction to meet any environ- transmission characteristics of partially submerged slotted wave screens. Int.
mental changing conditions. J. Ecol. Dev. 11 (F08), 20–35.
Laju, K., Sundar, V., Sundaravadivelu, R., 2007. Studies on pile supported double
The study of the new proposed breakwater effects on the shoreline
skirt breakwater models. J. Ocean Technol. CCMC 11 (1), 32.
is under progress now. The results obtained will be presented in Rageh, O., Koraim, A., 2010. Hydraulic performance of vertical walls with
future publications. horizontal slots used as breakwater. Coastal Eng. 57 (8), 745–756.
Rageh, O., Koraim, A., Salem, T., 2009. Hydrodynamic efficiency of partially
immersed caissons supported on piles. Ocean Eng. 36 (14), 1112–1118.
References Suh, K.D., Jung, H.Y., Pyun, C.K., 2007. Wave reflection and transmission by
curtainwall-pile breakwaters using circular piles. Ocean Eng. 34 (14-15),
Abdel-Mawla, S., Balah, M., 2001. Wave energy absorption by an inclined slotted- 2100–2106.
wall breakwater. J. Sci. Res. Faculty of Eng., Suez Canal University., Port-Said. Suh, K.D., Shin, S., Cox, D.T., 2006. Hydrodynamic characteristics of pile-supported
Edwards, B.L., 2006. Investigation of the Effects of Detached Breakwaters at Holly vertical wall breakwaters. J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 132, 83.
Beach and Grand Isle, Louisiana. Louisiana State University. Sundar, V., 2002. Hydrodynamic pressures and forces on quadrant front face pile
Farouk, T., 2010. General meteorology and physical oceanography study at the supported breakwater. Ocean Eng. 29 (2), 193–214.
North Coast area of Egypt, Alexandria. Egypt, 54. Tsinker, G.P., 1995. Marine Structures Engineering: Specialized Applications.
Frihy, O.E., 2001. The necessity of environmental impact assessment (EIA) in Kluwer Academic Publishers.
implementing coastal projects: lessons learned from the Egyptian Mediterra-
nean Coast. Ocean Coast. Manage. 44 (7-8), 489–516.

You might also like