Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 1. Who may practice law. - Any person heretofore purpose of evasion. So help me God."
Sec. 2. Requirements for all applicants for admission to the court therein, or in the highest court of any State or Territory
bar. - Every applicant for admission as a member of the bar of the United States, and who can show by satisfactory
must be a citizen of the Philippines, at least twenty-one years certificates that they have practiced at least five years in any
of age, of good moral character, and a resident of the of said courts, that such practice began before July 4, 1946,
Philippines; and must produce before the Supreme Court and that they have never been suspended or disbarred, may,
satisfactory evidence of good moral character, and that no in the discretion of the Court, be admitted without
charges against him, involving moral turpitude, have been examination.chanrobles virtualawlibrary
Sec. 3. Requirements for lawyers who are citizens of the two preceding sections shall, before being admitted to the
United States of America. - Citizens of the United States of examination, satisfactorily show that they have regularly
America who, before July 4, 1946, were duly licensed studied law for four years, and successfully completed all
members of the Philippine Bar, in active practice in the courts prescribed courses, in a law school or university, officially
of the Philippines and in good and regular standing as such approved and recognized by the Secretary of Education. The
may, upon satisfactory proof of those facts before the affidavit of the candidate, accompanied by a certificate from
Supreme Court, be allowed to continue such practice after the university or school of law, shall be filed as evidence of
taking the following oath of office:chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary such facts, and further evidence may be required by the
court.
"I, _________________________, having been permitted to
continue in the practice of law in the Philippines, do solemnly No applicant shall be admitted to the bar examinations unless
swear that I recognize the supreme authority of the Republic he has satisfactorily completed the following courses in a law
of the Philippines; I will support its Constitution and obey the school or university duly recognized by the government: civil
laws as well as the legal orders of the duly constituted law, commercial law, remedial law, criminal law, public and
authorities therein; I will do no falsehood, nor consent to the private international law, political law, labor and social
doing of any in court; I will not wittingly or willingly promote legislation, medical jurisprudence, taxation and legal ethics.
or sue any groundless, false or unlawful suit, nor give aid nor chan robles virtual law library
he began the study of law, he had pursued and satisfactorily writing. - Persons taking the examination shall not bring
completed in an authorized and recognized university or papers, books or notes into the examination rooms. The
college, requiring for admission thereto the completion of a questions shall be the same for all examinees and a copy
four-year high school course, the course of study prescribed thereof, in English or Spanish, shall be given to each
therein for a bachelor's degree in arts or sciences with any of examinee. Examinees shall answer the questions personally
the following subjects as major or field of concentration: without help from anyone.
Sec. 7. Time for filing proof of qualifications. - All applicants answers without much loss of time, the Supreme Court may
for admission shall file with the clerk of the Supreme Court allow such examinee to use a typewriter in answering the
the evidence required by section 2 of this rule at least fifteen questions. Only noiseless typewriters shall be allowed to be
(15) days before the beginning of the examination. If not used. chan robles virtual law library
required by section 5, and if embraced within sections 3 and 4 The committee of bar examiners shall take such precautions
they shall exhibit a license evidencing the fact of their as are necessary to prevent the substitution of papers or
admission to practice, satisfactory evidence that the same has commission of other frauds. Examinees shall not place their
not been revoked, and certificates as to their professional names on the examination papers. No oral examination shall
standing. Applicants shall also file at the same time their own be given.
Sec. 8. Notice of applications. - Notice of applications for to the bar of the Philippines shall take place annually in the
admission shall be published by the clerk of the Supreme City of Manila. They shall be held in four days to be
Court in newspapers published in Pilipino, English and designated by the chairman of the committee on bar
Spanish, for at least ten (10) days before the beginning of the examiners. The subjects shall be distributed as follows: First
examination. day: Political and International Law (morning) and Labor and
and Public Officers); International Law (Private and Public); Sec. 12. Committee of examiners. - Examinations shall be
Taxation; Remedial Law (Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, conducted by a committee of bar examiners to be appointed
and Evidence); Legal Ethics and Practical Exercises (in by the Supreme Court. This committee shall be composed of
Pleading and Conveyancing). a Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall act as chairman,
and who shall be designated by the court to serve for one times shall be disqualified from taking another examination
year, and eight members of the bar of the Philippines, who unless they show to the satisfaction of the court that they
shall hold office for a period of one year. The names of the have enrolled in and passed regular fourth year review
members of this committee shall be published in each volume classes as well as attended a pre-bar review course in a
Sec. 13. Disciplinary measures. - No candidate shall The professors of the individual review subjects attended by
endeavor to influence any member of the committee, and the candidates under this rule shall certify under oath that the
during examination the candidates shall not communicate candidates have regularly attended classes and passed the
with each other nor shall they give or receive any assistance. subjects under the same conditions as ordinary students and
The candidate who violates this provision, or any other the ratings obtained by them in the particular subject.
International Law, 15 per cent; Taxation, 10 per cent; Sec. 19. Attorneys' roll. - The clerk of the Supreme Court
Remedial Law, 20 per cent; Legal Ethics and Practical shall keep a roll of all attorneys admitted to practice, which
Exercises, 5 per cent. roll shall be signed by the person admitted when he receives
his certificate.
Sec. 15. Report of the committee; filing of examination
papers. - Not later than February 15th after the examination, Sec. 20. Duties of attorneys. - It is the duty of an
justice and judicial officers; produce or prove the authority under which he appears, and
(d) To employ, for the purpose of maintaining the causes the court, may be punished for contempt as an officer of the
confided to him, such means only as are consistent with truth court who has misbehaved in his official transactions. chan
and honor, and never seek to mislead the judge or any robles virtual law library
(e) To maintain inviolate the confidence, and at every peril to represent client on appeal. - An attorney who appears de
himself, to preserve the secrets of his client, and to accept no parte in a case before a lower court shall be presumed to
compensation in connection with his client's business except continue representing his client on appeal, unless he files a
from him or with his knowledge and approval; formal petition withdrawing his appearance in the appellate
court.
(f) To abstain from all offensive personality and to advance no
fact prejudicial to the honor or reputation of a party or Sec. 23. Authority of attorneys to bind clients. - Attorneys
witness, unless required by the justice of the cause with have authority to bind their clients in any case by any
(i) In the defense of a person accused of crime, by all fair and client no more than a reasonable compensation for his
honorable means, regardless of his personal opinion as to the services, with a view to the importance of the subject matter
guilt of the accused, to present every defense that the law of the controversy, the extent of the services rendered, and
permits, to the end that no person may be deprived of life or the professional standing of the attorney. No court shall be
liberty, but by due process of law. bound by the opinion of attorneys as expert witnesses as to
When an attorney unjustly retains in his hands money of his attorney for a party to a case without authority so to do. The
client after it has been demanded, he may be punished for practice of soliciting cases at law for the purpose of gain,
contempt as an officer of the Court who has misbehaved in either personally or through paid agents or brokers,
his official transactions; but proceedings under this section constitutes malpractice.
Sec. 26. Change of attorneys. - An attorney may retire at Court of First Instance. - The Court of Appeals or a Court of
any time from any action or special proceeding, by the written First Instance may suspend an attorney from practice for any
consent of his client filed in court. He may also retire at any of the causes named in the last preceding section, and after
time from an action or special proceeding, without the such suspension such attorney shall not practice his
consent of his client, should the court, on notice to the client profession until further action of the Supreme Court in the
A client may at any time dismiss his attorney or substitute certified copy of the order or suspension and a full statement
another in his place, but if the contract between client and of the facts upon which the same was based. Upon the receipt
attorney has been reduced to writing and the dismissal of the of such certified copy and statement, the Supreme Court shall
attorney was without justifiable cause, he shall be entitled to make full investigation of the facts involved and make such
recover from the client the full compensation stipulated in the order revoking or extending the suspension, or removing the
contract. However, the attorney may, in the discretion of the attorney from his office as such, as the facts warrant. chan
court, intervene in the case to protect his rights. For the robles virtual law library
Sec. 27. Attorneys removed or suspended by Supreme Court produce witnesses in his own behalf, and to be heard by
on what grounds. - A member of the bar may be removed or himself or counsel. But if upon reasonable notice he fails to
suspended from his office as attorney by the Supreme Court appear and answer the accusation, the court may proceed to
for any deceit, malpractice, or other gross misconduct in such determine the matter ex parte.
justice and to protect the rights of the party. It shall be the and upon proper application, permit the appearance, as amici
duty of the attorney so assigned to render the required curiae, of those lawyers who in its opinion can help in the
service, unless he is excused therefrom by the court for disposition of the matter before it; or it may, on its own
sufficient cause shown. initiative, invite prominent attorneys to appear as amici curiae
availability of funds as may be provided by law the court may, Sec. 37. Attorneys' liens. - An attorney shall have a lien upon
in its discretion, order an attorney employed as counsel de the funds, documents and papers of his client which have
oficio to be compensated in such sum as the court may fix in lawfully come into his possession and may retain the same
accordance with section 24 of this rule. Whenever such until his lawful fees and disbursements have been paid, and
compensation is allowed, it shall not be less than thirty pesos may apply such funds to the satisfaction thereof. He shall also
(P30.00) in any case, nor more than the following amounts: have a lien to the same extent upon all judgments for the
(1) Fifty pesos (P50.00) in light felonies; (2) One hundred payment of money, and executions issued in pursuance of
pesos (P100.00) in less grave felonies; (3) Two hundred such judgments, which he has secured in a litigation of his
pesos (P200.00) in grave felonies other than capital offenses; client, from and after the time when he shall have caused a
(4) Five hundred pesos (P500.00) in capital offenses. chan statement of his claim of such lien to be entered upon the
robles virtual law library records of the court rendering such judgment, or issuing such
which said government has an interest direct or indirect. LAW STUDENT PRACTICE RULE
Sec. 35. Certain attorneys not to practice. - No judge or tribunal, board or officer, to represent indigent clients
other official or employee of the superior courts or of the accepted by the legal clinic of the law school. chan robles
Office of the Solicitor General, shall engage in private practice virtual law library
authorized by this rule, shall be under the direct supervision examinations to 70 per cent effective since 1946.
filed, must be signed by the supervising attorney for and in - On June 21, 1953, the President allowed R.A. 972 to
behalf of the legal clinic. chan robles virtual law library become a law without his signature.
SEC. 3. Privileged communications. - The Rules safeguarding - After its approval, many unsuccessful bar candidates
privileged communications between attorney and client shall appealed and requested for the re-examination of their
In re Cunanan legal preparation is one of the vital requisites for the practice
- Controversies arose when Republic Act No. 972 “Bar property, life, honor and civil liberties.
- Under the Rules of Court governing admission to the bar, “in individuals to dedicate themselves to such a delicate mission
order that a candidate (for admission to the Bar) may be is to create a serious social danger. Moreover, the statement
deemed to have passed his examinations successfully, he that there was an insufficiency of legal reading materials is
must have obtained a general average of 75 per cent in all grossly exaggerated.
- Believing themselves as fully qualified to practice law as department should in any manner be subject to legislative
those reconsidered and passed by this court, and feeling control. Perhaps the dominant thought of the framers of our
conscious of having been discriminated against, unsuccessful constitution was to make the three great departments of
candidates who obtained averages of a few percentage lower government separate and independent of one another. The
than those admitted to the Bar agitated in Congress for, and idea that the Legislature might embarrass the judicial
secured in 1951 the passage of Senate Bill No. 12 which, department by prescribing inadequate qualifications for
attorneys at law is inconsistent with the dominant purpose of Chairman of the Commission on Elections be declared null
making the judicial independent of the legislative department, and void because Monsod did not meet the requirement of
and such a purpose should not be inferred in the absence of having practiced law for the last ten years.
For lack of unanimity in the eight Justices, that part of article corporations as to their rights under the law, or appears in a
1 which refers to the examinations subsequent to the representative capacity as an advocate in proceedings
approval of the law, that is from 1953 to 1955 inclusive, is pending or prospective, before any court, commissioner,
valid and shall continue to be in force, in conformity with referee, board, body, committee, or commission constituted
section 10, article VII of the Constitution. by law or authorized to settle controversies. Otherwise stated,
Cayetano vs Monsod
Atty. Christian Monsod is a member of the Philippine Bar,
201 SCRA 210, 1991 having passed the bar examinations of 1960 with a grade of
Monsod was nominated by President Aquino to the position of 73. He has also been paying his professional license fees as
Chairman of the COMELEC on April 25, 1991. Cayetano lawyer for more than ten years. Atty. Monsod’s past work
opposed the nomination because allegedly Monsod does not experiences as a lawyer-economist, a lawyer-manager, a
possess the required qualification of having been engaged in lawyer-entrepreneur of industry, a lawyer-negotiator of
the practice of law for at least ten years. Challenging the contracts, and a lawyer-legislator of both the rich and the
validity of the confirmation by the Commission on poor — verily more than satisfy the constitutional
Appointments of Monsod’s nomination, petitioner filed a requirement — that he has been engaged in the practice of
petition for Certiorari and Prohibition praying that said law for at least ten years.