Appeal No. WD81013 IN THE MISSOURI WESTERN COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT MICHAEL MCKINZY Petitioner/Appellant, v. CARLETHA MCKINZY, Respondent/Respondent. ?s Moti i dent's Brief for liance with Ri $4.04 pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rules COMES NOW, Michael McKinzy, Appellant-Petitioner, and hereby moves to strike Respondent's Brief pursuant to Rule 84.04. Appellant specifically states in this motion that: (1) Respondent's brief violatesRule 84.04(a) because it does not contain a table of authorities and "no cases are cited in Respondent's entire brief"; and (2) Respondent's brief violates Rule 84.04(e) because the argument portion of the brief does not follow the order of the points relied on portion, does not restate the point relied on immediately preceding the argument related to that point, and contains no legal argument, does not contain any citations to the record on appeal and does not contain any citations to relevant legal authority. State v. Shipley, 517 SW 3d 37 - Mo: Court of Appeals, Western Dist. 2017.The trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Appellant, due to lack of proper service of process as prescribed by Missouri statute. McDonald v. MaBee, 243, U.S. 90 (1917). Respectfully submitted, Midhatl & Moby: Ba. Haalbol Michael E. McKinzy, Sr. 9606 W. 86" St. Apt. D Overland Park, Kansas 66212 (913) 742-3621 michaelmckinzy@gmail.com Petitioner, Pro se eee Thereby certify that I mailed a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Strike Respondent's Brief for Failure to Comply to Rule 84.04 was mailed by first-class mail postage prepaid to: Carletha R. Gaston, Respondent, at 8904 Cambridge Apt. 3205 Kansas City, Missouri 64138, Respondent, on this 24 th of April 2018. Michal 6 Mc Pony Sa HoHloo 8