Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Method
to use.
• Students read passages at their own pace and complete several
Using RT was good 9 17 8 2 0
multiple choice questions and (optional) writing segments. The practice for me.
questions stress problem solving, analytical skills, and critical Using RT helped me 5 21 8 2 0
thinking. In adherence with the CCSS, the questions address key Why was ReadTheory used? improve my reading skills.
ideas and details, integration of knowledge, and craft and structure. I used RT mostly on my 15 12 6 2 1
cell phone.
• Records of quizzes taken are available in graphs. Quizzes are • As the structure of typical ReadTheory sessions resembles that of
I plan to use RT in the 1 20 14 1 0
broken down by grade level in relation to student pretest grade level MIC’s final exams for reading courses, it was hoped that the future for personal study.
scores. system would:
1. familiarize students with the exam format, Extent to which students believed…
2. improve students’ reading skills, Strongly Agree Neither Disagree Strongly I didn’t
agree agree nor disagree check.
3. provide students with a tool for self-directed learning. disagree
• The questions are designed to improve critical thinking ability and The progress data 2 14 14 3 1 2
develop an understanding of the scope, structure, intention, received from my
teacher OR the RT
Conclusion
memory, and vocabulary of reading passages. system was motivating.
• Teachers can observe student activity through class accounts and Getting badges on the 4 15 14 2 0 1 Pros:
view extensive reports showing student levels and progress. RT system (shown to • The platform was rated highly by students.
me by my teacher) was
• ReadTheory is motivational due to its incorporation of game motivating. • The instructor found the system informative of student efforts and
mechanics. easy to use.
• Students move through grade levels (a relative measure designed
to approximate U.S. grade school levels) based on quiz scores:
• The system assigns readings appropriate to individual level, and
allows for level changes in accordance with performance.
Optional Student Comments • ReadTheory reading content is extensive and continually expanded.
• ReadTheory is mobile-friendly and therefore highly accessible.
▲ Grade up: score 90% or greater • It is free. Cons:
Rationale for completing the number of ReadTheory quizzes reported:
► Grade unchanged: score between 70% and 90% Because, I want to improve reading skill. (+3 more similar comments) • Initial placement testing was sometimes inaccurate, often placing
▼ Grade down: score below 70% Learning by short stories is very comfortable for me. Because, I was able to study little by little. If stories so
students at a higher level than their overall performance in the
• Students earn “knowledge points” primarily by answering questions How was ReadTheory used at MIC? long, I may had to spend much time. (+1 more similar comment)
ReadTheory is fun and some stories are interesting. (+3 more similar comments) system would indicate.
correctly, using resources to make discoveries, and performing well Because it was homework. (+2 more similar comments)
• Student levels did not improve dramatically over the course of use, if
Because, I want to get good score. (+4 more similar comments)
on quizzes. Points unlock designated titles, designs, and other • The system was piloted in two freshmen EFL reading courses at at all. Students may have to use the system more often and/or over
game mechanics built into the program, but have no affect on grade MIC in 2016: RDG1 (spring) and RDG2 (fall). There was no Rationale for reported infrequency of ReadTheory use: a longer period to see substantial gains.
or Lexile levels. overlap of students between the courses.
At first, I did everyday, but after reach this gole I hardery do it.
• Whether ReadTheory helped prepare students for finals was not
I have lots of things to do. Especially, I did also have to submit another many homeworkers. (+2 more
• Each class (of 18 students) was allotted a number of ReadTheory similar comments) investigated.
quizzes to complete by 4 deadlines in the semester. RDG2
students were allotted a higher number of quizzes to complete.
General Feedback regarding the ReadTheory system
It is easy for me to use. (+4 more similar comments) References
• Students were graded only on completion of work, not on I get the badge, higher motivation. (+4 more similar comments)
Read theory was good for me. I got good reading skill. (+3 more similar comments) Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and
progress through the system or level attained. It is short story. It's easy to do during short time. (+2 more similar comments)
strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
• Questionnaires addressing student perceptions were completed at Also, it help my reading speed to improve.
It was interesting.
the end of each semester. There are a lot of problems. However, I could resolve these. (+1 more similar comment) Romeo, G., Hock, T., & Plante-Kropp, A. (2016). A preliminary study concerning the
effectiveness of an online reading comprehension and writing program. ReadTheory.org Data
• Student progress in the system was analyzed. I think that teacher did have to control amount of boderline about reading. Read theory…needed too much
Collection Study 2.0. https://readtheory.org/static/pdf/RTStudy2.pdf
time in order to get score. Probably, all students get tired and uncomfortable in terms of motivation.