Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research papers
PII: S0022-1694(17)30595-4
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.002
Reference: HYDROL 22222
Please cite this article as: Pumo, D., Arnone, E., Francipane, A., Caracciolo, D., Noto, L.V., Potential implications
of climate change and urbanization on watershed hydrology, Journal of Hydrology (2017), doi: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.002
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Potential implications of climate change and urbanization
on watershed hydrology
[1]{Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali, Università degli Studi
2, Cagliari, Italy}
Correspondence to: Dario Pumo (email: dario.pumo@unipa.it – phone: +39 091 23896519;
Abstract
This paper proposes a modeling framework able to analyze the alterations in watershed
hydrology induced by two recurrent drivers for hydrological changes: climate change and
urbanization. The procedure is based on the coupling of a stochastic weather generator with a
land use change model for the generation of some hypothetical scenarios. The generated
hydrological model to reconstruct the basin response under different conditions. Several
potential climate alterations are simulated by imposing negative and positive variations in the
applied to a large basin and a much smaller sub-basin; the results show how climate and land
1
use changes may interact and affect the fundamental hydrological dynamics and how the
processes governing basin hydrological response may change with spatial scale.
Keywords
Hydrological Change; Climate Change; Land Use and Cover Change; Urbanization; tRIBS.
1 Introduction
Natural and anthropogenic pressures on hydrological systems often coexist and mutually
changes” (Ceola et al., 2014). Natural pressures are essentially related to modifications
induced by the intrinsic variability of the different natural processes involved in the water
cycle. Anthropogenic pressures are related to all the human activities (e.g., pollution of
streams and aquifers, agricultural and irrigation practices, overexploitation of water resources,
runoff regimentation and regulation, etc.) and human-induced alterations on climate forcings
(e.g., greenhouse gases emission in atmosphere, heat island effect, etc.) and basins’
characteristics (e.g., morphology, land cover and use, soil imperviousness degree, etc.) that
Evaluating the relative weight of such pressures on the observed hydrological changes
represents a very challenging issue, which is the focus of many recent and high-priority
debates within the scientific community. Unsolved questions regarding the assessment of
human impacts on water cycle, the environmental change and related risks, as well as the
most appropriate way for modeling hydrological changes, interactions and feedback between
natural and human induced perturbations, are all objectives defined for the scientific decade
Panta Rhei research initiative “Change in Hydrology and Society” (Montanari et al., 2013).
2
Among the several possible triggers and physical motivations for hydrological changes
(Ward et al., 2008; Ceola et al., 2014), in this work we focus the attention on the two most
Climate change is undoubtedly the most studied potential driver for hydrological changes,
especially in the last decade (e.g., Wang and Alimohammadi, 2012; Pumo et al., 2010;
Francipane et al., 2015; Liuzzo et al., 2015; Viola et al., 2016). Climate alterations have
weather events characteristics (Burn et al., 2011; Arnone et al., 2013, Pumo et al., 2016a),
reducing snowfall in favor of rainfall and melting snow and ice in cold regions (Berghuijs et
al., 2014), affecting evapotranspiration processes due to changes in wind speed (McVicar et
al., 2012), atmospheric humidity (Willet et al., 2008), and the radiative component (Wild,
2009), and affecting water resources in terms of both quantity and quality.
dramatically increased in the last decade, causing many of the observed changes in climate
and global warming. The IPCC-AR5 takes into account four different greenhouse gas
concentration trajectories (i.e., Representative Concentration Pathways – RCP 2.6, 4.5, 6, and
8.5) for making projections, corresponding to four possible hypotheses about the rise of
greenhouse gases emission in the years to come. Even considering the least pessimistic
scenario (i.e., RCP 2.6), future projections draw further warming and long-lasting alterations
in all the components of the climate system, with dry regions becoming drier and wet regions
becoming wetter and, as a consequence, an increase in disparity between dry and wet regions
(Donat et al., 2016). Changes in climate are projected to have significant fallout upon
streamflow regime and the hydrological response of many basins around the world (e.g., Stahl
et al., 2010; Pumo et al., 2016b and 2017, Nazif et al., 2017; Viola et al. 2017).
3
The continuous urbanization process observed worldwide seems to be another important
driver for hydrological changes. On average, human population is growing across the globe,
becoming increasingly urban also because of higher migration fluxes towards urbanized areas.
Recent studies have estimated that about the 50% of the world’s population currently resides
in urban areas (Cohen, 2003), and this percentage is projected to rise up to the 70% by the
2050 (UN, 2008). This process is often accompanied by an increase in the land uptake for
inhabitant. There is an urgent and growing need to synthesize hydrological responses to this
so rapid process of urbanization to both improve the understanding of the possible impacts on
different aspects (physical, hydrological, chemical, ecological, etc.) of river basins and
Urbanization leads to a loss in pervious surface which results, on the one hand, in a
reduction of the water infiltration into the soil and, on the other hand, in an alteration of the
natural drainage pathways. Several and different hydrological impacts on watersheds can be
addressed to the process of urbanization (Jacobson, 2011; Salvadore et al., 2015), such as: the
reduction of rainfall interception by tree canopies; a faster response in terms of runoff (Huang
et al., 2008) with higher flow velocities due to a decreased surface roughness; a greater
magnitude of river flow (Hawley and Bledsoe, 2011) with a higher frequency of peak flow
discharges and flood events (Prosdocimi et al., 2015); modifications in runoff composition
The future hydrological response of most of the basins across the world might be impacted
simultaneously by climate change and urbanization, and this makes the origin of the induced
changes extremely difficult to be distinguished. Several and different approaches have been
carried out in recent years to study the coupled effects of these two driving forces (Praskievicz
and Chang, 2009; Fletcher et al., 2013). Impacts of such perturbations on watershed
hydrology have been principally explored through the application of hydrological models to
4
real or synthetic cases. Some key literature papers on this topic are summarised in Table 1,
where it is possible to notice how results from different studies are often contrasting about
which of the two potential triggers produces the most relevant changes. These discrepancies
in results strengthen the idea that the two perturbations may have different relative weights on
hydrological changes depending on the regional context, the adopted spatial and temporal
scales, as well as the hydrological variables chosen for the analysis. Final considerations on
which of the two perturbations is prevalent could be affected by the fact that the effects of
This paper aims to explore the sensitivity of hydrological changes to both climate change
and on the different runoff components under different scenarios. Whit this aim we developed
a modeling framework based on the combined use of three models: (1) an advanced weather
generator, i.e. the AWE-GEN (Fatichi et al., 2011); (2) an ad-hoc implemented land use
change model; and (3) a spatially-distributed hydrological model, i.e. the tRIBS (Ivanov et al.,
2004a and 2004b). The analysis has been carried out through synthetic modelling experiments
conducted on the Baron Fork at Eldon river basin (OK, USA) and on a nested and smaller
The aforementioned aim of the paper is achieved through three specific objectives that also
provide the structural sub-headings used for the following Materials and Methods section: (i)
reproducing climate schemes, which accounts for different possible future climate alterations
and rainfall properties, by using the AWE-GEN; (ii) reproducing changes in land-use due to
urbanization by using the implemented land use change model; (iii) generating the
hydrological responses of the two basins under different scenarios, which derive from the
5
Table 1. Summary of some relevant past works, conducted in different environments and with different
approaches, for the assessment of the impact of climate change (CC) and land use change (LUC) on watershed
GCM= General Circulation Models; BROOK=hydrologic model for eastern forests; CHARM=Climate and Human
Activities-sensitive Runoff Model; SWAT= Soil and Water Assessment Tool; VIC = Variable Infiltration Capacity;
DHSVM=Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model; MOPEX=Model Parameter Estimation Experiment;
HBV=Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning; WetSpa= Water and Energy Transfer in Soil, Plant and Atmosphere
6
This study differs from most of the current literature on this topic for the simultaneous
introduction of some innovative aspects, such as: (i) the consideration of a wide range of
possible future trends, embracing possible extreme trends projected for the next century in
many regions across the world; (ii) the use of a novel land use change model that allows also
to evaluate the importance of considering the spatial distribution of built-up areas for
some of which rarely investigated, such as the runoff components partitioning or the potential
changes in evapotranspiration fluxes; and (iv) a quantitative analysis on the influence of the
basin area in hydrological changes production (i.e., spatial scale effects), through the
comparison of the results obtained at the main basin and at the sub-basin.
2 Theoretical Background
The TIN-based Real-time Integrated Basin Simulator - tRIBS (Ivanov et al., 2004a and
topography.
The model is capable to solve basin hydrology at very high temporal (i.e., hourly) and
spatial (10-100m) resolutions, simulating most of the natural hydrological processes (e.g.,
groundwater level, etc.). Moreover, it simulates the interactions of the fluxes inside the
surface soil layers, the unsaturated zone and the water table. Evapotranspiration is estimated
through a surface energy model, based on the Penman-Monteith method. Short-wave and long
7
wave radiation components are simulated accounting for geographic location, time of year,
As an important aspect for the application in this work, the model reproduces four different
mechanisms of runoff generation, thus capturing the highly complex hydrological response in
surface runoff generation for saturation excess and infiltration excess (fast runoff
components), the perched subsurface streamflow and the groundwater exfiltration (slow
runoff component). The infiltration process is strictly related to the soil characteristics and the
runoff generation. The parameterization of the infiltration process involves the assumption of
gravity-dominated flow in heterogeneous, anisotropic soils. Evolution of the wetting front and
top front in an element may lead to unsaturated, perched, surface, and completely saturated
states. The unsaturated and saturated zones are coupled, accounting for the interaction of the
moving infiltration front with a variable groundwater table. Topography and soil control the
The model has been successfully used in various applications, demonstrating its capability
in well reproducing the hydrological response across different climate and basins (e.g., Vivoni
et al., 2005; Mascaro et al., 2013; Moreno et al., 2016), as well as in reproducing synthetic
experiments (e.g., Noto et al., 2008; Caracciolo et al., 2014). Moreover, the flexibility in the
structure and the capability in well reproducing the main hydrological processes, made it very
suitable for the coupled use with additional components for the assessment of other
geomorphic processes, thus expanding its applicability (e.g., Francipane et al., 2012; Arnone
et al., 2016; Dialynas et al., 2016; Pumo et al., 2016c). For further details concerning the
model structure, parameterization and forcings, interested readers are referred to the original
papers.
8
2.2 Weather Generator: AWE-GEN
variables including precipitation, cloudiness, shortwave radiation, air temperature, and wind
speed over a range of time scales. Below, only some details relative to the internal models for
rainfall and temperature series generation are reported, since these are the only two climatic
variables involved in trends application for this work, while interested readers are referred to
the original paper for a comprehensive description of the overall weather generator model.
The AWE-GEN uses the Neyman-Scott Rectangular Pulse (NSRP) approach to generate
the internal structure of the precipitation process. Storms origin occurs in a Poisson process
with the arrival time represented by the parameter λ [hr-1]. Each storm origin generates a
mean β-1 [hr]. A rectangular pulse, with duration exponentially distributed with mean η-1 [hr]
and intensity distributed according to a Gamma distribution with shape parameter α and scale
parameter θ [mm/hr], is associated to each raincell. The precipitation model is then based on a
total of six parameters (i.e., λ, µc, β, η, α, and θ) that, in order to take into account possible
Air temperature series are generated with a mixed physics-based and stochastic approach
developed by Ivanov et al. (2007). In particular, the temperature at the generic time t is
calculated as the sum of a stochastic and a deterministic component; the former is estimated
through an autoregressive model, while the latter is assumed to be directly related to the
divergence of radiative and eddy heat fluxes. The parameters and the coefficients used to
9
2.3 Land Use Change Model
hydrological changes, it is here developed and adopted a land use change model capable to
reproduce a prefixed increment in the impervious fraction of a basin. As other widely used
land use change models (e.g., CA-MARKOV by Subedi et al., 2013), this model is
characterized by an inductive approach, based on the fact that future changes are modeled on
the basis of changes that have occurred in the past, through the analysis of a set of explanatory
variables that somehow may have played a role in determining occurred changes.
The proposed model belongs to the class of probabilistic cellular automata models, based
on: (i) the raster schematization of the basin; (ii) the definition of an initial status at any cell of
the raster structure; and (iii) the iterative generation of a new grid at each successive temporal
step (i.e., 1 year) according to time invariant fixed rules that determine the new status in each
cell as a function of its previous status and the status of the cells in its neighborhood.
Two possible status are allowed as initial status at any cell of the raster, i.e., urban or not-
urban. The basic criterion is that the initial not-urban cells, not located on the stream network,
are “available” to be replaced by new urban cells, while the inverse process (i.e., initial urban
cells replaced by new not-urban cells) cannot occur. It is worth emphasizing that some recent
strategies of Low Impact Development (LID), aimed to minimize the urbanization impact on
surfaces), have led to some examples of reconversion from classical (impervious) urban
surface to less impervious urban surface of “new conception”. As previously said, this
Once the temporal horizon (T) and the initial and final fractions of urban areas are set, the
model computes the initial (ni) and final (nf) number of urban cells and, consequently, the
total number of initially not-urban cells that, after T years, will be replaced by urban cells. An
10
imposed positive and linear trend in the urbanization process allows determining the number
of cells that will be urbanized at every temporal step (n yr). A value of probability of being
process) and, successively, a new grid is generated at each step starting from the previous one
and replacing the first n yr “available” cells with higher urbanization probability by “new”
urban cells.
The model, schematically represented in Fig. 1, requires as input a raster layer of the basin
with information about the slope and the initial status (i.e., urban or not-urban) of each cell
and the stream network location. It reproduces urban areas growth according to two different
modalities: random urban expansion and rule-based urban expansion. The two possible
operational modalities differ in the configuration process for the assignment of the
urbanization probability to each “available” cell. When the model is set on the random urban
expansion mode, an equal urbanized probability is assigned to all the “available” cells at each
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the Land Use Change Model. Flow chart of the model on the left. In the
box on the right hand side, within the red contour, the Moore neighborhood (Ring 1) and the extended Moore
neighborhood (Ring 2) for a generic “available” cell (in blue). SUB and SLB are the slope class limits (Table 2).
11
The rule-based urban expansion mode follows “rational” criteria according to which urban
areas arguably tend to expand around pre-existing urban zones, in easily accessible area with
gentle slopes. For such modality, the urbanization probability of each available cell depends
on: (i) the cell slope (higher probability is assigned to cells with lower slope); (ii) the total
number of contiguous urban cells; and (iii) the total number of urban cells in the
neighborhood.
Table 2. Criteria for the assignment, at any iteration, of the urbanization probability to each available cell
according to the rule-based urban expansion mode. UC= previous urban cell. Num of UC= number of UC.
SUB= slope upper bound. SLB= slope lower bound. SUB-SLB= slope within the range between SLB and SUB.
For instance, class 5 is constituted by cells with slope within the range SUB-SLB, without any urban cell within
the Ring 1 and with one or more urban cells within the Ring 2; cells in class 5 are ranked first depending on the
number of urban cells surrounding each within the Ring 2 and then, at equal rank, on the basis of their slope.
Probability Class Slope Class Ring 1 Ring 2 1st order 2nd order
0 >SUB no no slope -
3 SUB-SLB no no slope -
The entire domain of urbanization probability is divided into 9 equally spaced classes of
probability (Table 2). At any iteration, each “available” cell is associated to one of the classes
depending on the occurrence of one or more of the following conditions: slope lower, higher
12
or between a fixed range; presence/absence of urban cells within the Moore neighborhood
(Ring 1, including the eight cells surrounding the central analyzed cell on a two-dimensional
square lattice 3x3); presence/absence of urban cells within the extended Moore neighborhood
(Ring 2, including the forty-eight cells surrounding the central analyzed cell on a two-
dimensional square lattice 7x7). The cells within each class are successively ranked, first
according to a 1 st order criterion and then, if needed (e.g., for two or more cells with the same
rank), according to a 2nd order criterion, following fixed ranking criteria specific for each
probability class and reported in Table 2. Finally, in order not to have two cells with the same
probability, an increasing and equally spaced probability (within the class probability range)
is assigned to each cell depending on its rank. Once the probability values are assigned to all
the cells of the basin, they are rescaled so that they sum to one.
Model parameters are: the temporal horizon; the operative time step for new grids
generation; the projected percent variation of the fraction of urban areas over the selected
temporal horizon. An internal calibration setting concerns the definition of three classes of
slope considered to generate the different urbanization probability classes (Table 2): it
includes the definition of an upper bound for the cell slope, SUB, above which urbanization
can be considered as “scarcely probable” and a lower bound, SLB, below which urbanization
can be considered as “highly probable”. Model output will be a new raster of urban areas
3 Study Area
The application presented in this work represents a synthetic experiment carried out on the
Baron Fork at Eldon river basin (Oklahoma - USA) and its nested sub-basin Peacheater
Creek at Christie. Namely, the effects of opportunely generated and combined synthetic
climate/land-use scenarios on real-world case studies are evaluated. These case studies have
13
been selected since they were originally used to test, calibrate and validate the tRIBS model
(Ivanov et al., 2004a and 2004b). Information available from past works (Ivanov et al., 2004b;
Noto et al., 2008) has been here used to characterize the spatial distribution and the properties
of soils and land cover, as well as the topological and geomorphologic characteristics of the
case study. A 100 m resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM), available at the link
Figure 2. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and stream network for Baron Fork at Eldon and Peacheater Creek at
The Baron Fork at Eldon (hereinafter Main Basin, MB) is characterized by a drainage area
of about 800 km2 and elevation ranging between 218 and 587 m a.s.l. (mean elevation equal
to 346 m a.s.l.). The terrain of the watershed is characterized by gentle slopes at the basin
headwaters and quite rugged terrain in its lower areas. About 52% of the basin is occupied by
deciduous and evergreen forests, while almost 45.8% is occupied by croplands, orchards and
bare soils. The remaining 2.4% is occupied by built up areas. The surface soil texture is
14
The Peacheater Creek at Christie (hereinafter Sub-Basin, SB) has a drainage area of about
64 km2, with elevations ranging between 248 and 432 m. a.s.l. (mean elevation equal to 328
m a.s.l.). The sub-basin is characterized by gentle (slopes between 2 and 5%) to steep (slopes
grasslands (mainly located in the southern part of the basin) and cropland-urban areas (mainly
in the northern region). The impervious fraction of the sub-basin is estimated in about 1.56%.
A total of nine different climate schemes has been created by the AWE-GEN. Each scheme
includes 30-year hourly time-series for all the variables required by the tRIBS (i.e.,
temperature, rainfall, air humidity, wind speed, air pressure and sky cover).
The first generated climate scheme (Baseline) is a control period relative to the current
conditions, which has been created by inferring the AWE-GEN parameters from hourly
climate data recorded from 1992 to 1998 at the Fayetteville weather station (located in close
proximity to the basins: 36°1’N, 94°166’W). The current climate is characterized by a mean
air temperature of 14.6°C and a not seasonal pluviometric regime; on average, the annual
precipitation (approximately 1,160 mm) results from about 48 storm events per year with a
The other eight climate schemes have been obtained by imposing a fixed positive trend in
temperature and different trends in precipitation. For such schemes, no trends in the other
In view of the objectives of this study, the considered trends for the generation of the
future climate schemes derive from widespread limit conditions projected for the next century
15
at the global level by the IPCC-5AR (IPCC, 2013) and not from projections specific for the
area under analysis. With regard to the temperature, the trend considered for all the future
climate schemes, consists in an increase of 2.6 °C in the mean annual temperature. This value
can be considered as a very likely projection for the mean global annual temperature increase
over a temporal horizon of 100 years, since it is simultaneously falling within the “likely”
range defined for three of the four hypothesized emission trajectories for the period 2081-
2100 by the IPCC-5AR; specifically, it is the upper bound for the “moderately optimistic”
RCP 4.5 “likely” range, a medium value for the “moderate” scenario RCP 6, and the lower
With regard to the future rainfall trends, in order to simulate in a comprehensive manner
the different climate changes over various regions of the Earth, two opposite IPCC-5AR
“likely” projections for the period 2081-2100 and under the most pessimistic greenhouse gas
concentration trajectory (i.e., RCP 8.5) have been considered: the reduction by the 25% of the
mean annual precipitation (MAP) forecasted for most of mid-latitudes and sub-tropical dry
regions, and the increment by the 25% of the MAP forecasted for some high-latitudes and
equatorial Pacific regions and for many wet regions at the mid-latitudes.
The generated future precipitation schemes can then be distinguished between schemes
under the condition CN, considering a negative trend in MAP (-25% with respect to the
Baseline) and schemes under the condition CP, with a positive trend in MAP (+25% with
respect to the Baseline). For each of these two conditions, four different types of climate
schemes (A, B, C, D), with equal MAP and characterized by a different rainstorm
characterization, have been created by the AWE-GEN according to the following criteria:
storm events (i.e., -25% in the mean number of storms per year for CNA and +25% for
CPA), while the mean rainfall intensity and duration remain unaltered;
16
B. variation in MAP obtained reducing (CNB) or increasing (CPB) by the 25% the mean
intensity of rainfall events, while the mean frequency and duration of rainfall events
remain unchanged;
variation to both the rainstorm frequency and intensity (i.e., -13.4% for the CNC and
D. variation in MAP obtained by increasing the mean storm intensity by the 50% for both
the CND and CPD and, consequently, reducing the mean frequency of rainfall events (-
Figure 3. Mean annual number and intensity of rainfall events for each climate scheme generated by the AWE-
GEN. Circles of the same color are characterized by the same mean annual precipitation (MAP) accordingly to
the legend. Dashed lines graphically sketch the criteria used to generate the different types of climate scheme:
Schemes type A (variation in only rainfall frequency); Schemes type B (variation in only rainfall intensity);
Schemes type C (equal percent variation for both rainfall frequency and intensity); Schemes type D (fixed
17
The main rainfall event characteristics of the generated climate schemes are schematically
represented in Fig. 3. Some minor discrepancies in the resulting mean annual frequency and
intensity of rainfall events with respect to the parameters fixed in the AWE-GEN for each
scheme can be noticed because of the stochastic nature of the weather generator. Details on
the mean annual temperature (MAT), MAP, and rainstorm characteristics (i.e., frequency,
intensity, and duration) for each climate scheme are reported in Table 3.
Table 3. Main characteristics of the generated climate schemes (MAT = Mean Annual Temperature; MAP=
Mean Annual Precipitation; mean annual rainfall events Frequency, Duration and Intensity) and Land Use Maps.
Applied trends are reported in brackets. Italic characters are used to highlight the parameters where a trend is
applied. MB= main basin; SB=sub-basin. On the right hand side, the simulation scheme, with the considered
application basins (MB, SB or both SB/MB) for each climate-land use scenarios.
Temp. Precipitation U0 U1 U2 R
18
It is worth emphasizing that climate model projections have suggested an intensification of
extreme precipitation intensities that could be ascribed to the increased capability of holding
(CC) relation (+6-7%°C-1). Several studies have demonstrated different scaling relationships
at sub-daily timescales (e.g. Westra et al 2014), with scaling varying with the temperature
distribution and depending on the rainfall type (e.g., Blenkinsop et al., 2015); different
approaches have been specifically developed for simulating future rainfall sequences under
temperature (e.g. Wasko and Sharma, 2015 and 2017). The climatic schemes of type D here
generated, account for such a type of relationship between precipitation and temperature,
considering conditions even more severe than the most extreme observed case, since the
imposed percent increment (+50%) of rainfall intensity is well above the mean increment
(+36.4%) that would be obtained considering the so-called “super-CC scaling” (i.e., 2xCC;
e.g., Blenkinsop et al., 2015) and the imposed temperature increment (+2.6°C).
The urbanization process is highly variable at the global level, since it depends on a variety
of local factors, such as the socio-economic attractiveness of the available areas for
urbanization and the political, social, and geographical context in which the process is
evaluated. As for the climate schemes generation, we considered the current land use map as
the baseline map (U0) and three hypothetical future land use maps (U1, U2, and R) generated
by imposing different urbanization trends in the land use change model described in Sect. 2.3.
Spatial heterogeneity of land use, vegetation cover, and soils are accounted for in tRIBS by
assigning the relevant land use/soil texture type to the nodes of the computational domain. As
in Ivanov et al. (2004b), in this study the classes of land use and vegetation are overlapped to
19
define three different classes: forest, grassland and urban. Each class is characterized by the
parameters derived from Ivanov et al. (2004b) and Noto et al. (2008) and reported in Table 4;
within-class parameter variations are not allowed thus reducing the potential for over-
parameterization.
Through the application of the land use change model to generate the future maps, some of
the forest and grassland cells (assumed as not-urban cell) can be replaced by urban cells,
characterized by the parameters corresponding to the urban class, listed in Table 4. The input
raster layer for model, containing information relative to the slope, the stream network, and
the existing urban areas of the basin, was obtained by crossing three different raster layers: the
first one, obtained from the DEM, includes the slopes, while the last two were obtained by
rasterizing the map of the stream network and the current land use map, respectively, with the
Table 4. Soil parameters for each land use type. θsat is the soil moisture at saturation; Ksat is the saturated
hydraulic conductivity; ψb is the air entry bubbling pressure; λ is the pore-size distribution index. The residual
soil moisture is equal to 0.05 mm3/mm3 for all the soil types (source: Ivanov et al., 2004b; Noto et al., 2008)
θsat Ksat ψb λ
Soil Type
mm3/mm3 mm/hr mm -
Urban 0.3 0.5 -400 0.2
Grassland 0.3 3 -200 0.25
Forest 0.4 30 -100 0.6
Given the synthetic nature of our experiment, some rough assumptions have been made to
set the land use change model parameters. A temporal horizon of 100 years has been fixed
consistently with that selected for the generation of future climate schemes, while the
operative time step has been fixed equal to 1 year. With regard to the parameters SUB and
SLB, we first derived the cumulative distribution function of the slopes of the initial (at time
0) “available” cells and, then, assumed the slope corresponding to the 75th percentile (equal to
20
9.75°) as upper bound, SUB, and the slope at the 25% percentile (i.e., 2.35°) as lower bound,
SLB. This hypothesis leads to assume the urbanization process as probable in cells with slope
lower than SUB; this is confirmed by the observation of the current land use map, where the
mean slope of cells classified as urban is 3.6°, about the 47% of urban cells has slopes lower
than SLB and the 95% lower than SUB. Clearly, the model application to real cases requires
Given the low current fraction of urban areas within the case study (2.32% at the MB),
relative high percent increments of urbanization have been imposed to the entire basin (MB)
to generate the future land use maps; increments of urban areas in the sub-basin (SB) are
The maps U1 and U2 have been obtained imposing an urbanization of +300% and 600%,
respectively, under the operational modality of rule-based urban expansion, while the map R
has been obtained imposing the same percent increment of U2 under the random urban
expansion modality with the aim to study the influence of the spatial pattern of urbanization
processes. The chosen increments are coherent with some trends observed in many fast
developing regions of the world such as Africa or Asia. For instance, Gumindoga et al.
(2014), through the comparison of land cover satellite images (Landsat 5 TM) acquired at
different times, verified an increment of more than the 200% and 500% in only 23 years
(from 1986 to 2008) for two catchments in Zimbabwe. The intermediate percent increment of
+300% considered for the map U1 is consistent with commonly observed trends over the last
two decades within developed geopolitical areas, such as Europe or north-America (e.g., UN,
The different future land use maps are represented in Fig. 4 together with the current map
(U0). Coherently with the values set in the model, at the MB the fraction of urban areas has
increased up to the 9.28% for U1 and 16.24% for U2 and R, while even higher values result
21
for the SB (Table 3). As it can be noticed from the histograms reported in Fig. 4, the fraction
of forest at the MB remains almost unaltered when the rule-based urban expansion criterion is
considered (i.e., U1 and U2) and the new urban cells show a clear tendency to settle on cells
previously classified as grassland, where slopes are usually lower and a higher density of
urban nuclei in the surrounding zones can be noticed in the current map (U0 in Fig. 4).
Figure 4. Land Use Maps for the Baron Fork at Eldon (MB): Current U0, intermediate U1 (+300% urban fraction
percent increment under the rule-based urban expansion mode), and maximum urbanization maps (+600% urban
fraction percent increment) under the rule-based urban expansion mode (U2) and the random urban expansion
mode (R). The histograms in the subsets show the relative percentages of the three land use classes at the basins
for the different maps. Red contour, in both the maps and the histograms, denotes the Peacheater Creek at
22
The same behavior occurs at the SB (characterized by an initial relative percentage of
grassland higher than the MB) and explains why the land use change model application leads
for the SB to a percent increment of urbanization that is higher than that relative to the MB.
Under the random urban expansion hypothesis (i.e., R), the final increment in the relative
percentage of urban cells within the MB is approximately equally partitioned between cells
previously classified as grassland and forest since the initial percentage of these two land use
classes was almost the same (44.9% for grassland and 52.8% for forest).
Several stationary (in both climate and land use) scenarios, obtained by combining the
generated climate schemes (Sect. 4.1) and land use maps (Sect. 4.2), are here explored.
schemes and the 4 land use maps previously generated. In order to reduce the complexity of
the analysis and simplify the results presentation, simulations have been carried out for only
22 scenarios according to the simulation scheme reported in Table 3. The symbolism used to
identify each scenario involves the use of a code defined by a first part referring to the climate
scheme (Baseline, CNi, or CPi, with i=A, B, C or D) and a second part referring to the
considered land use map (U0, U1, U2, R); for instance, the scenario CPC-U2 refers to the
climate scheme CPC, i.e., positive trend in MAP (CP) and rainstorm characterization of type
The hydrological response under the different scenarios is studied, through various
hydrological indicators, in terms of annual water balance components, flow duration curve of
daily flow and runoff component partitioning. The basin response resulting from the
considered scenarios has been analyzed, in some cases, only at the MB or at the SB, and, in
other cases, at both the basins (Table 3). In particular, the different effects of the application
23
of all the climate schemes under the various modalities (i.e., CNi or CPi) are analyzed in a
comprehensive manner exclusively for the SB, considering only scenarios with the U0 and U2
land use maps. The extensive analysis on the effects of different trends in the urbanization
process (U1, U2 and R) is focused only on the MB (Table 3), showing the results relative to
only scenarios including, as climate schemes, the Baseline and future climate schemes of the
type C (CNC and CPC), which represents the intermediate schematization with variations in
5 Results
The first class of explored indicators involves a set of descriptors of the hydrological
regime such as the mean annual values and the interannual variability for the principal basin-
scale water balance components. Different box-plots, with indication of the quartiles (25th,
50th and 75th percentiles), the minimum and the maximum (lower and upper whiskers,
respectively), and the mean (gray points), are represented in Figs. 5 and 6 with regard to the
annual values (mm/yr) of precipitation, actual evapotranspiration and runoff for each scenario.
More specifically, Fig. 5 refers to the precipitation, which is equal for the MB and the SB,
since it is assumed as uniformly distributed over the entire study area. Changes in
precipitation regime rely only on the stochastic generation of the various climate schemes by
the AWE-GEN after the imposition of the different trends. No significative differences can be
noticed from Fig. 5 among the various CNi schemes (A, B, C and D), that are all characterized
by the same mean (imposed value) and median, and almost the same interquartile range (IQR)
that is essentially unaltered also with respect to the Baseline (i.e., ca. 240 mm).
With regard to the CPi schemes, the median values for the cases A and C (both
characterized by an increment in the rainfall frequency) are significantly lower (i.e., ca. -60
24
mm) than the corresponding mean values, denoting an appreciable degree of skewness. Apart
from the CPD (unique case with a decrement in rainfall frequency), where the IQR is
essentially unaltered, the IQR for all the other CPi cases is almost doubled (ca. 460 mm) with
Figure 5. Box-plots of annual precipitation for the Baseline, the climate schemes with negative trends (CNA,
CNB, CNC, CND), and those with positive trends (CPA, CPB, CPC, CPD) in precipitation. Gray points refer to the
The box-plots relative to the runoff and evapotranspiration are shown in Fig. 6 for both the
MB (Figs. 6a and 6b) and the SB (Figs. 6c and 6d). The consideration of the urbanization
process as the sole factor of change (under the climatic Baseline) leads to slight increments in
the annual totals of both evapotranspiration and runoff (black box-plots in Fig. 6), which is
directly proportional to the considered increment in the fraction of impervious areas. For the
MB, urbanization induces almost the same, very slight, percentage increment in the mean and
median annual values for both the evapotranspiration (ca. +1.2% under the Baseline-U1 and
+2.4% under the Baseline-U2; Fig. 6a) and the runoff (ca. +1.6% and +4.1%, respectively;
Fig. 6b), while the IQR values are essentially unaltered with respect to the current scenario.
25
The same behavior can be observed also at the SB even if, moving from U0 to U2, the mean
and median of both the annual evapotranspiration (Fig. 6c) and runoff (Fig. 6d) increase more
Figure 6. Box-plots of annual actual evapotranspiration (left panels: 6a and 6c) and annual runoff (right panels:
6b and 6d) for the MB, Baron Fork at Eldon (upper panels: 6a and 6b), and for the SB, Peacheater Creek at
Christie (lower panels: 6c and 6d). Gray points refer to the mean annual values of runoff and evapotranspiration
As it can be noticed from the comparison between the Baseline-U2 and Baseline-R
scenarios at the MB (Figs. 6a and 6b), the random process of urbanization induces percent
increments in the mean annual runoff (MAR) and evapotranspiration (MAE) only slightly
lower (i.e., less than the 2%) than those obtained under the Baseline-U2, while the IQR
26
In order to analyze the influence that spatial variability and scale may have on hydrological
changes induced by the only urbanization, the alterations resulting by the land use map
conversion from U0 to U2 under the Baseline at the MB and at the SB are compared. The
percent increments in MAR (+9.4%) and in MAE (+4.9%) at the SB were more than two
times those resulting at the MB (Fig. 6). Both the runoff and evapotranspiration production at
a larger scale were then less sensitive to the imposed changes in land use, demonstrating that
wider basins tend to attenuate the complex local patterns of water fluxes generation, even if a
not negligible aspect could be the fact that the considered percentage increment of urban areas
for the SB was consistently higher than for the MB (Table 3).
Table 5 shows the percentage changes in runoff (PCR, %) and evapotranspiration (PCAE,
%) for each future scenarios with respect to the reference scenario (Baseline-U0). In the same
table, the results of a sensitivity analysis of the two water balance components to precipitation
are also shown; in particular, SR is the sensitivity of runoff to precipitation computed as the
ratio of PCR over the percentage change in precipitation (PCP, %), while SAE is the
For both the MB and the SB, the PCAE of the CNC-U0 is consistently different in absolute
value from that of the CPC-U0 (Table 5), despite the considered perturbations in precipitation
for the two cases are equal in magnitude (i.e., ±290 mm/yr in MAP). This could be explained
by the fact that, under the CNC-U0, the reduction in precipitation produces a decrease in the
evapotranspiration process, due to a reduced soil water supply, that is partially compensated
by the increment of the atmospheric water demand due to the increment in temperature; on the
contrary, for the case of CPC-U0, the increment in both precipitation and temperature produces
27
Table 5. Percentage (%) changes in the Mean Annual Runoff (PCR) and Mean Annual Evapotranspiration
(PCAE) with respect to the reference scenario (Baseline-U0). Sensitivity of runoff (SR) and evapotranspiration
(SAE) to variations in precipitation. MB=main basin; SB= sub-basin. Italic refers to results for the SB.
Scheme Map MB SB MB SB MB SB MB SB
applied on MAP; for instance, at the MB, the scenario CNC-U0 produces a drastic decrement (-
65.5%) of PCR, while, for the case of CPC-U0, the effects of a higher MAP are partially
28
balanced by the effects due to an increase in evapotranspiration, and the PCR, that in this case
is positive (+46%), results lower, in absolute value, than that relative to the CNC-U0 (Table 5).
Comparing the SR with the SAE, the runoff appears much more sensitive to precipitation
changes than evapotranspiration (Table 5), especially for the scenarios with climate schemes
CNi, where, for both the MB and the SB, MAP reduction with respect to the current scenario is
almost entirely reflected in a reduction of MAR (ca. -250 mm/yr). The sensitivity of
evapotranspiration to precipitation is slightly higher for the scenarios with climate schemes
CPi, where the increment in MAP is partitioned between, for almost two-third, an increase in
MAR (ca. +180 mm/yr) and, for the remaining part, an increase in the water amount lost for
evapotranspiration.
From Fig. 6a, it can be also observed an increased interannual variability (i.e., higher IQR
values) in the annual evapotranspiration for both the cases of CNC-U0 and CPC-U0 at the MB
with respect to the current scenario that could be a direct effect of the increase in temperature
for the two scenarios. The same can be noticed with regard to the runoff (Fig. 6b) under the
CPC-U0, while the runoff IQR for the CNC-U0 results notably reduced. This last aspect could
be related to a reduction in the surface component of runoff, due to the less frequent and
intense precipitation, and which, among the different runoff components, is usually the most
The analysis of the box-plots relative to the SB under the same land use condition (Figs. 6c
and 6d), is extremely useful to quantify the impact of different rainfall characteristics at equal
MAP (i.e., climatic schemes of type A, B, C and D), on the basin hydrological response.
With regard to the evapotranspiration, the results (Fig. 6c and Table 5) relative to the
scenarios considering the U0 map and the CNi schemes show a relevant sensitivity to the
different rainfall characterizations (i.e., A, B, C, and D); when MAP reduction is obtained
through a reduction in rainfall frequency by the 13.4% (CNC), the 25% (CNA), and the 50%
29
(CND), the MAE reduces proportionally by the 0.5%, 3.1% and 8.1%, respectively, while for
CNB, the MAE is even higher (+0.6%) that that relative to the climatic Baseline. The
differences among the responses relative to the four scenarios CPi-U0 (Fig. 6c) are much more
restrained; all these scenarios, in fact, display the same SAE values (Table 5) and almost the
With regards to the runoff (Fig. 6d), the results for both the negative (CNi) and positive
(CPi) climate perturbations under the different climate configurations (i.e., A, B, C and D) can
be related to those relative to the evapotranspiration (Fig. 6c). The reduction in MAR for the
scenarios CNi-U0, is inversely proportional to the reduction in MAE (Table 5), so that, in
absolute terms, the lowest PCR (-41.6%) is associated to the case with the highest PCAE (i.e.,
CND-U0), while the highest PCR (-65.4%) is associated to the only case with an increase in
MAE (CNB-U0). The same considerations can be transferred to the case of positive climate
significative differences in MAR and in the runoff IQR can be noticed among the results
relative to different modalities considered for increasing rainfall annual totals. For all the
cases, the increment in MAP implies an increase in MAR ranging between the 45.5% and the
50.1%, with a maximum (+208 mm/yr) for the case with the lowest MAE and PCAE (CPD-
U0) and a minimum (+182 mm/yr) for the case with the highest MAE and PCAE (CPC-U0).
Comparing the modifications, with respect to the current scenario, produced at the two
basins (MB and SB) by the application of only climate trends (scenarios CNC-U0 and CPC-U0),
it can be noticed how, differently from the previously analyzed case of application of only
land use changes, spatial scale effects on runoff and evapotranspiration annual components
played a negligible role. The annual runoff coefficient passes from about 0.35 for both the
basins (under the Baseline-U0 scenario) to about 0.15 (at the SB) and 0.18 (at the MB) under
the CNC-U0, and about 0.40 for both the basins under the CPC-U0, demonstrating that the
30
application of both negative or positive trends in climate essentially leads to the same
quantitative modifications in the mean annual rainfall-runoff transformation process for the
two basins. In terms of annual evapotranspiration, the differences between the modifications
induced by climate changes at the SB and at the MB are even less marked than those relative
to the runoff component, with essentially the same PCAE (Table 5).
For the MB, the MAE (Fig. 6a) increases by the 1.7% and 4.1% for the cases CNC-U1 and
CNC-U2, respectively (Table 5); thus, with regards to the evapotranspiration, an exacerbation
of the effects can be noticed when urbanization and climate changes are simultaneously
applied. As a consequence, an opposite effect can be noticed with regard to the annual runoff
values (Fig. 6b), with a percent reduction in MAR (PCR equal to -61.1% and -56.6% for the
case CNC-U1 and CNC-U2, respectively) significantly lower than that obtained summing the
The same behavior can be observed also with regard to the results for the SB (Figs. 6c and
6d). The increments in the annual evapotranspiration induced by the urbanization totally mask
the reduction induced by the CN climate changes for all the cases (A, B, C and D), eventually
resulting in PCAE values (from +3.2% for the case CND-U2 to +9% for the case CNC-U2,
Table 5) higher than the sums of the modifications singularly induced by the two
degree (Fig. 6d) reduces the effects due to a negative trend in MAP, resulting, at the end, in a
percent reduction (PCR from -26.2% for the case CND-U2 to -52.6% for the case CNB-U2,
Table 5) that is, however, lower than the value that would result from the application of the
superposition principle.
Moreover, it is interesting to observe that, in the negative climate schemes A, C and D, the
combination with the urbanization process leads to a change in the PCAE from negative to
31
positive values. This emphasizes the important role of urbanization under negative climate
changes in affecting the evapotranspiration processes. Only the climate scheme CNB shows
positive PCAE for both the two land-use maps meaning that, in the case of less intense but
As it can be noticed comparing the SR values in Table 5, relatively to different land use
maps at equal CNi climate scheme, urbanization reduces considerably the sensitivity of runoff
to a reduction in precipitation; in less measure, the opposite can be observed with regard to
When positive climate trends (CPi) are applied, the induced modifications in MAE and
MAR are concordant with those induced by the application of the urbanization trends and
much more relevant in terms of relative weight; the simultaneous application of the two types
of perturbations then produces overlapping effects, and, more specifically, an increase in both
the components. In this case, the SR and SAE values in Table 5 highlight how urbanization
increases significantly the sensitivity of both the runoff and the evapotranspiration to
increments in precipitation.
For the MB, the PCR associated with the scenario CPC-U0 (Table 5) is rather similar to that
relative to the CPC-U1 and CPC-U2, highlighting the negligible contribution of land use
changes to the alterations in the annual runoff with respect to the positive climate trend
application; this is also evident from the comparison of the blue box-plots in Fig. 6b, where
no significative differences among the scenarios CPC-U0, CPC-U1 and CPC-U2 can be noticed
in the mean, median and IQR values. Also with regard to the induced increments in the annual
evapotranspiration, the positive climate changes seem to have a predominant role, even if, in
this case, the impact of land use evolution from U0 to U2, seems to be more significative.
When “positive” climate schemes (CPi) are considered, the simultaneous application of
32
changes in climate and land use slightly smoothes the effects on annual evapotranspiration
At the SB (Fig. 6c and 6d), the coupled application of the land use and climate changes for
the case CPA-U2, and, in less measure, also for the CPC-U2, again softens the effects of the
two trends singularly considered. On the contrary, for the scenarios CPB-U2 and CPD-U2, the
combined application of the two trends slightly exacerbates the effects, especially on the
annual runoff. This could be related to the fact that, differently from the climatic schemes of
type A and C, the mean rainfall frequency for the schemes B and D is unaltered or reduced
with respect to the Baseline and the mean rainfall intensity is consistently higher. This aspect
strengthens the importance of paying attention to the rainfall events characterization in studies
focusing on the coupled effects of climate changes and urbanization; in particular, the
simultaneous occurrence of an increment in both the impervious areas and the rainfall events
intensity (e.g., CPD-U2) would imply consequences on the runoff regime more relevant than
those computable by summing the effects of the two perturbations separately applied, and, at
the same time, more relevant than those relative to a climate scheme with the same MAP and
rainfall events less intense and more frequent (e.g., CPA-U2). Actually, as it can be noticed
from Figs. 6c, and 6d, despite the scenarios CPA-U2 and CPD-U2 are characterized also by the
same MAE, the former shows an annual runoff, on average, about 60 mm/yr lower than that
relative to the latter since a more consistent fraction of rainfall is retained by the soil and/or
When urbanization and climate changes are simultaneously applied, the influence of the
spatial scale on the induced hydrological changes appears contrasting depending on the types
of climate perturbations considered. When positive climate trends are considered (CPC-U2),
the alterations in both the runoff and evapotranspiration generation with respect to the current
scenario at the MB are less marked than the corresponding modifications at the SB,
33
demonstrating again that larger basins may act as a sort of low-pass filter, with the higher
spatial variability of topography, vegetation and geology characteristics that may attenuate the
effects of the two perturbations on the hydrological response of the basins. When negative
climate trends are considered (CNC-U2), the percent variation in MAE with respect to the
current scenario resulting at the MB (+4.1%) is still lower (about half) than that at the SB,
while the percent variation in MAR is considerably higher at the MB (-45.7% at the SB versus
-56.6% at the MB). This behavior could be related to the considered percentage increment of
urban areas that is for the SB higher than for the MB (Table 3); thus, the compensation
between the effects due to the rainfall reduction and the increase in the degree of
imperviousness of the basin on runoff production could be more accentuated at the SB.
Flow duration curves (FDCs), describing a basin attitude to provide flows of various
magnitudes, are widely used to summarize the basin scale streamflow regime and the
temporal runoff variability, also in problematic applications such as under climate change
The FDCs of daily runoff, computed from the simulated time-series for all the considered
scenarios, are here analyzed and compared. The curves are shown, as semilog-plots, in Fig. 7,
using different colors for the various scenarios; in particular, left panels (Figs. 7a and 7c) refer
to the comparison between scenarios characterized by the Baseline and the CNi climate
schemes, while right panels (Figs. 7b and 7d) refer to the analogous comparison between
scenarios considering the Baseline and the CPi. A double representation is provided for each
FDC: the part of the curve with runoff values below 50 mm (middle part and lower tail of the
FDC), including all the most recurrent values, is represented in the main graph, while a zoom
on the highest and rarest (exceedance frequency below 0.002) runoff values (upper tail of the
34
As for the analysis at the annual scale, the analysis of daily runoff regime highlights a clear
predominance of climatic factors of change with respect to the urbanization, in altering the
basin hydrological response. The application of a negative trend in MAP (CNi climate
schemes) seems to have a relevant impact mainly on the lower and more frequent runoff
values, with a marked downshift of the FDCs (Figs. 7a and 7c), while a positive trend on
MAP (CPi climate schemes) induces consistent effects mainly on the highest and rarest runoff
values (insets in Figs. 7b and 7d), with a significative up-shift of the upper tail of FDCs.
The introduction of CNi schemes leads to a clear change on the hydrological regime that,
for the analyzed basins, from “perennial” (flow conditions over almost all the year) becomes
“intermittent”; a consistent increase in the percentage of days of the year with null runoff can
be noticed, especially for the SB and when rainfall events are much more intense and less
frequent (schemes of type D). For the MB and for all the considered land use maps (Fig. 7a),
the percentage of null runoff passes from about the 0.02% (Baseline), that essentially means
absence of null daily runoff in a year, to about the 10% (CNC), corresponding to almost 40 dry
days per year, while for the SB (Fig. 7c) it passes from the 0.64% (ca. 2 days per year) to a
percentage ranging between the 16.8% (i.e., ca. 61 dry days per year for the CNB-U0) and the
29.4% (i.e., ca. 107 dry days per year for the CND-U0). This means that, in this case there is a
spatial scale effect in the change of the hydrological regime determined by the fact that, in the
MB, the contribution of the slow and sub-superficial runoff components is greater than that
relative to the superficial component, which is more sensitive to climate alterations (as it will
With regard to the CPi schemes, the percentage of dry days for year is almost null for all
the cases (Figs. 7b and 7d), with the only exception of the CPB-U0 and CPB-U2 scenarios for
the SB, where the percentage (i.e., ca. 5 dry days for year) is about doubled with respect to the
current scenario. For all the considered scenarios and both the basins, the percentage of dry
35
days remains essentially unaltered passing from U0 to U2, resulting then insensitive to the land
use changes. As widely discussed in the previous sections, this is due to the predominant
effect of the considered climate alterations compared to the effects of land-use changes.
Figure 7. Flow duration curves (FDCs) of daily runoff (mm) at the MB, Baron Fork at Eldon (upper panels: 7a
and 7b), and at the SB, Peacheater Creek at Christie (lower panels: 7c and 7d). All graphs are in semilog-plot.
Main graphs show only the curve for runoff values below 50 mm, while the inset figures show the curve only for
The impact of land use alterations on daily runoff, even if marginal with respect to that
induced by climate change, alters the runoff frequency distribution proportionally to the
considered increments in the urban areas fraction and shows a similar behavior for all the
considered climate schemes; in particular, the FDCs under altered land use conditions tend to
be lightly steeper (Fig. 7). The lower tail of the FDCs, after urbanization changes, results
slightly downshifted with respect to the current condition, denoting, at equal frequency, a
reduction in the associated runoff values and, at equal runoff values, a reduction in the
associated exceedance frequency. On the contrary, great part of the middle-curves and the
upper tail of all the FDCs result slightly up-shifted after urban areas growth (i.e., U1 and U2).
36
Differently from the analysis at the annual scale (e.g., Fig. 6b), when finer time-scale
resolutions (i.e., daily) are considered, the effects on runoff due to the consideration of
different criteria for the urbanization process can be noticed. As it can be observed from the
comparison between the FDCs under the Baseline-U2 and Baseline-R in Figs. 7a and 7b, the
consideration of a random criterion for urban expansion, rather than the rule-based criterion,
slightly emphasizes the effects of the urbanization, with a light lowering of the frequencies
related to the lowest runoff values (i.e., values below ca. 1 mm/day), while the highest and
rarest runoff values (values that are currently overcome for only the 10% of the year) became
This section analyzes potential changes in the composition of the total runoff through the
study of the following four runoff components time series and their spatial distribution: i)
infiltration-excess runoff (Hsrf); ii) saturation-excess runoff (Sbsrf); iii) perched return flow
The generation of the runoff mechanisms across the basins is mainly controlled by the
interaction between topography and soil texture characteristics (i.e., hydraulic and
hydrological soil properties), which vary in space, and by the way how these properties
For the sake of the processes understanding, Fig. 8 shows the spatial distributions of three
characteristics (columns) of the three main runoff components, i.e., Hsrf, Sbsrf, GWsrf (rows),
for the reference scenario (Baseline-U0) at the SB. The first column depicts the average rate
(mm/hr), estimated over the effective occurrence, of each runoff components (HRt, SbRt, and
GWRt) together with the scatter-plots of the same variable vs. the voronoi cell slope; the
second column depicts the relative occurrence (%) of each runoff mechanism in each voronoi
37
cell over the entire simulation (HOccr, SbOccr, and GWOccr) together with the scatter-plots
runoff component rate vs. occurrence; and, finally, the third column shows the mean annual
value (mm/year) of each runoff component (Hsrf, Sbsrf, and GWsrf, respectively) produced
Figure 8. Spatial distributions of the average rate of the three main runoff components (HRt, SbRt, GWRt)
together with the scatter-plot of the same variable vs. the voronois cell slope (first column); the relative
occurrence of the three components over the entire simulation (HOccr, SbOccr, GWOccr) together with the
scatter-plot of rate vs. occurrence (second column); mean annual value of each runoff component (Hsrf, Sbsrf,
GWsrf) produced by each voronoi cell (third column). Different colors within all the scatter-plots refer to
The infiltration excess runoff (Hsrf) depends on water accumulation in the unsaturated
zone in conditions of low vertical and lateral redistribution rates and, thus, it occurs when the
infiltration and redistribution rates of the top saturated layer are lower than rainfall intensity.
38
Therefore, this type of contribution is generally relevant on areas at low rate of hydraulic
conductivity, while in conductive soils, extremely intense rainfall events are necessary to
produce infiltration excess runoff. For this reason, its rate, HRt, is particularly high across the
forested and gentle areas of the SB (top-left graph of Fig. 8) while its occurrence, HOccr, is
very low in the same areas (top-middle graph in Fig. 8) and more frequent in the grassland
and urban areas, where the hydraulic conductivity rate is lower (Table 4). As a result of the
combination of these two processes, the total Hsrf component, at the annual scale, is mainly
generated in the grassland, urban, and gentle areas (top-right graph in Fig. 8).
Saturation excess (Sbsrf) and groundwater exfiltration runoff (GWsrf) are produced only in
cells where full saturation of the soil column is reached (e.g., groundwater discharge regions,
flat areas, perennial stream network and its floodplain), resulting then more related to the
topographic properties of the basin. In fact, the spatial patterns of the corresponding runoff
rate, occurrence, and specific volume (second and third rows in Fig. 8) clearly follow the
slope distribution over the basin, with high rates and occurrences (and, consequently, high
specific volume) in flat areas and along the stream networks. Although the similar spatial
patterns, the scatter-plots of rate vs. occurrence indicate different dynamics of generation for
the two runoff components; specifically, while the groundwater exfiltration runoff is almost
perennial in the stream network areas (relative occurrence reaches almost 100%) at low rate,
the saturation excess occurs much less frequently but at higher rates.
The spatial analysis of the variations, singularly induced by land use and climate changes,
in the mean behavior of the SB in terms of production of such runoff components (Hsrf, Sbsrf,
GWsrf) is synthesized in Fig. 9. This last shows the spatial distribution of the percent
variation with respect to current scenario (Baseline-U0) of the different runoff components at
any voronoi cell under the scenarios Baseline-U2 (first column), CNc-U0 (second column) and
39
As expected, the alteration in land use (first column in Fig. 9) leads to an increase of Hsrf
(even more than 95%) in the areas where the expansion of urbanized areas occurs (top-left
graph in Fig. 9), i.e., in the northeastern zone of the basin (Fig. 4) characterized by flat areas.
Conversely, about in the same areas, a decrease in the slow runoff components (Sbsrf, GWsrf)
is observed; significant variations of GWsrf occur along the main stream network.
Figure 9. Maps of percent variation of the three main runoff components (Hsrf, Sbsrf, GWsrf) with respect to
current scenario Baseline-U0 (reference map), for the SB and for the scenarios: Baseline-U2 (first column), CNc-
The application of negative climatic trend (second column in Fig. 9) determines a decrease
in Hsrf (even by the 100%) mainly in the forested areas (top-middle graph in Fig. 9). In fact,
as discussed before, the production of this component in conductive soils is strictly related to
40
the rainfall properties, which, in this case, are characterized by a decrease of both rainfall
Conversely, the decrease in the slow runoff components (Sbsrf and GWsrf) is observed in
the flat areas and in the stream network. Similar dynamics are observed under the CPc-U0
scenario (third column in Fig. 9), but in the opposite direction of change. In fact, the increase
in precipitation intensity and frequency determines an increase in Hsrf. In this case, the
infiltration-excess component is generated also across areas that were characterized by a low
occurrence of this type of mechanism under the Baseline (Fig. 8), resulting in an overall
increase of this component (even more than 250%), especially in the steep zones of the
forested areas. Similarly, also the other runoff components (i.e., Sbsrf and GWsrf) increase
significantly, especially along the stream network and the flat areas.
Figure 10 shows the average relative contribution of the different components (primary
axes) to the total mean annual runoff (secondary axes) produced by the MB (Fig. 10a) and SB
(Fig. 10b) basins across the various scenarios. The analysis of the runoff composition at the
current scenario shows that runoff is mainly generated by the Hsrf component (ca. 40% and
45% for the MB and the SB, respectively), followed by Sbsrf (30% and 23%, respectively) and
GWsrf (ca. 22% for both the basins); the lowest contribution is provided from the perched
return flow, Psrf (below the 10% for both the basins). Under the Baseline, the rule-based
criterion for urban expansion, determines a slight increase in the average total runoff, as well
as a change in the runoff compositions; specifically, the Hsrf component contributes even
more to the total runoff at expense of Sbsrf and, in a less rate, of the GWsrf component. This
is particularly evident at the SB, where the relative weight of Hsrf increases up to about the
61% (U2), while the relative weight of the Sbsrf component is almost halved.
41
(a)
(b)
Figure 10. Average relative contributions of the Hsrf (infiltration-excess), Sbsrf (saturation-excess), Psrf
(perched return flow) and GWsrf (groundwater exfiltration) runoff components (primary axes) to the total mean
annual runoff across the different scenarios for the main basin (a) and the sub-basin (b). The total mean annual
An increase in Hsrf can be ascribed to the sole consideration of the urbanization process
(Fig. 10) and it can be explained by an expansion of the areas where the infiltration excess is
most recurrent, due to the low conductivity properties (Fig. 8) of urban areas. Because the
42
urbanization verifies mainly in flat areas, the relative weight of Hsrf increases at expense of
Sbsrf, while the decrease of the GWsrf component is justified by a lower groundwater
recharge. Comparing the alterations, with respect to the current scenario, due to the scenarios
Baseline-U2 and Baseline-R at the MB (Fig. 10a), significative differences can be noticed in
the runoff components partition, highlighting the importance of the urban areas spatial
distribution with this regard. When a random criterion for urban expansion is considered,
urbanization impact is further emphasized, with a more marked increase in the relative weight
of the Hsrf and a reduction in the relative weight of the Psrf and GWsrf components. This
behavior is related to the fact that, under the Baseline-U2, the growth of urban areas occurs
mainly at the expense of grassland areas (Fig. 4), where runoff is mainly generated by the
Hsrf component, as specified in the Sect. 5.3.1 (top-right graph in Fig. 8). Conversely, under
the Baseline-R, the urbanization is randomly distributed over the SB (Fig. 4) leading to higher
percentages of grassland area, as compared to the Baseline-U2, and then preserving higher
values of Hsrf. Such a difference highlights how the urban growth pattern can, somehow,
The application of only CNi schemes under the U0 leads to very deep alterations in the
runoff composition for all the scenarios and for both the basins (Fig. 10). In particular, the
relative contribution of Hsrf becomes strongly dominant (in the order of the 80-85%, except
for the case CNB-U0 at the SB where it reaches about the 70%) at expense of the relative
weights of all the other components, especially, Sbsrf and GWsrf that decrease considerably
The analysis at the SB (Fig. 10b) also highlights the role of the rainfall characterization in
altering the runoff composition; more specifically, at equal MAP, the infiltration-excess
mechanism of runoff generation appears strongly favored by the increase in rainfall intensity.
This is explained by the fact that extremely intense rainstorms produce infiltration excess
43
runoff on cells with high hydraulic conductivity, as the forested areas in this application (Fig.
8 and Table 3), which is the most widespread soil class within the basin (Fig. 4).
Under unaltered land use map, less intense and more frequent rainfall events (i.e., CNB-U0)
produce a slow runoff component (given by the sum of Psrf and GWsrf) that, in relative
terms, weights on the total runoff much more (more than two times) than in the case
characterized by the highest rainfall intensity and lowest frequency (i.e., CND-U0), while the
relative weight of Sbsrf for the CNB-U0 is almost three times that for the CND-U0. This is due
to the fact that less intense and more frequent rainfall events allow for a more frequent
recharge of the groundwater and saturation of the subsurface layers. In absolute terms, the
significative difference in MAR between the two scenarios is almost entirely due to a higher
production of the fastest runoff component, i.e., Hsrf, in the case CND-U0 with respect to the
CNB-U0, while the contributions (in absolute value, i.e., mm/yr) of the other components to
the MAR are almost the same. When also urbanization trends are applied (under the CNi
manner with respect to the considered trend in urbanization (Fig. 10a), even if the considered
climate perturbations still maintain a predominant role in altering the runoff composition.
Positive trends in MAP (i.e., CPi schemes), under unaltered land-use map (i.e., the U0),
rainfall event characterization. When MAP increment is due to an equal percent increment in
rainfall intensity and frequency (i.e., the CPC), runoff partition among the various components
remains almost unaltered for both the basins (Fig. 10), and, thus, the increment in MAR is the
result of a proportional increment of all the runoff components. When MAP increase is
obtained exclusively through an increment of rainfall frequency (i.e., the CPA), the relative
importance of the Sbsrf, Psrf and GWsrf components increases, while the relative weight of
Hsrf on the total runoff reduces (Fig. 10b). In absolute term, the increase of MAR at the SB
44
under the CPA-U0 scenario (almost 200 mm/yr) is almost entirely due to an increase in the
slow runoff components. Finally, when MAP increment is generated through a relevant
increment of rainfall intensity, with unaltered (CPB) or reduced (CPD) rainfall frequency, the
relative weight of the Hsrf component increases, about from the 44% to the 52% at the SB, to
the detriment of the relative contributions of the Sbsrf and GWsrf components, while the
relative weight of Psrf is almost unaltered. The mechanisms of these processes are, again,
explained by the dynamics of the runoff components generation, which have been described
in Fig. 8. Specifically, the increase of the relative weight of the fast component, Hsrf, is
related to the rainfall intensity, given that most of the basin is characterized by a conductive
soil class; conversely, the increase of the slow runoff components, i.e., Sbsrf and GWsrf, is
mainly induced by an increase in rainfall frequency which allows the soil to get saturated
more frequently as well as to recharge the groundwater recharge. When these climate trends
(i.e., CPi schemes) are coupled with urbanization, the increment in the relative weight of all
the runoff components related to a saturation from below mechanism (i.e., Sbsrf, Psrf and
GWsrf) due to the climate perturbations under the CPA and CPC is completely masked by the
corresponding reduction due to the urbanization (Fig. 10b), which is prevalent. On the
contrary, the alterations due to the consideration of the other two climate schemes (i.e., CPB
and CPD) are strongly emphasized by the increment of the urban fraction within the basin.
The analysis on the impact of the spatial scale on the runoff components repartition has
confirmed the results previously obtained with regard to the annual water balance
components, also in accordance with other findings in literature (e.g., Amorocho, 1961;
Yildiz and Barros, 2009); as the basin area increases, the modifications on runoff components
repartition induced by changes in climate and land use are smoothed. The results relative to
the only application of trend in urbanization (under the Baseline) show that the relative
weights of all the runoff components are subjected to variations at the SB higher than at the
45
MB, especially with regard to Hsrf, whose relative weight increases by the 16% at the SB
versus the 10% at the MB. The same behavior can be observed comparing the modifications,
with respect to the current scenario, induced at the SB and the MB by the scenario CPC-U2.
These results could be also explained by the fact that the SB is characterized by a higher
6 Discussion
Similarly to other works in literature (see Table 1), this study uses different scenarios,
obtained from the combination of synthetic climate schemes and land use maps, as inputs to a
characterizing the basin-scale hydrological response. Two of the most recurrent causes of
hydrological changes have been investigated, comparing the effects induced by the separate
“anthropic” perturbations (urbanization). For the specific purpose of investigating the impacts
of land conversion, from natural to anthropic conditions, in this study we explicitly neglect
“natural” land cover changes, considering only the urbanization phenomenon resulting by the
human induced transformation of previously rural areas into more impervious areas (e.g.,
Higher mean annual rates for both evapotranspiration and runoff can be associated to the
inhibits the process of water infiltration into the soil, causing a consequent raise of both water
accumulation in the upper soil depths and surface runoff generation at the expense of the soil
moisture at deeper depths and groundwater recharge; this implies more water availability for
the evapotranspiration process from the soil surface as well as an increase in the surface
46
runoff with an evident modification of the basin efficiency in transforming rainfall into runoff
Climate alterations have highlighted a relative weight in altering all the analyzed
hydrological indicators higher than urbanization. The results have, in fact, demonstrated that
the application of only climatic trends implies modifications in the annual water balance
components more important than those consequent to the application of only urbanization
trends, in accordance, for instance, with the results of the retrospective analysis conducted by
Chen et al., (2005) for the Suomo River Basin (China). The consideration of the urbanization
as the sole factor of change has led to a percent increment in both the mean annual runoff and
evapotranspiration that is one order of measure lower than that induced by the consideration
The sum of the effects due to the two types of perturbation singularly applied has been
rather different from the effects evaluated when they were applied in coupled manner,
highlighting a strong not-linearity in the basin response to the change factors. When the
tends to smooth the effects of climate change on the annual-scale water balance components
and the runoff regime, while, on the contrary, an exacerbation of the effects can be noticed
when urban areas fraction increases under climate schemes with an increase in precipitation.
The results discussed in Sect.5.1 have shown how an increase of urbanization implies, on
average, a slight increase in both evapotranspiration and runoff at the annual scale, while the
coupled application of the positive trend on temperature and the negative trend on
to the imposed reduction in rainfall frequency, and, more markedly, in runoff. The two types
of perturbations have contrasting effects, and, in fact, when they are applied simultaneously,
the alterations induced by negative climate changes on the annual-scale water balance
47
components are partially smoothed by the effects due to the increase in the impervious areas
fraction within the basin. The results in Table 5 on the sensitivity of runoff to both the
considered factors of change also confirmed some of the evidences from Bronstert et al.
(2002) and Wang and Hejazi (2011), according to which the influence of climate change and
The adopted land use change model allowed for evaluating an aspect scarcely investigated
in the past literature, that is the importance of different detail levels in the modeling of the
spatial distribution of built-up areas for hydrological applications. The consideration of a rule-
based criterion to drive the urban expansion process, rather than the random criterion, appears
not particularly significative in terms of annual water balance components, especially with
regard to the evapotranspiration, while, it tend to be more noticeable when a finer time-scale
resolution (i.e., daily or hourly) is considered, with some clear differences in terms of daily
runoff FDC and runoff components partitioning. Actually, the importance of the urbanization
spatial pattern in affecting storm-event hydrological response of a basin was also recognized
The runoff composition seems to be deeply affected by the two considered perturbations,
coherently with other findings in literature (e.g., Todd et al., 2007; Tavakoli et al., 2014). The
areas led to an increase in the relative contribution of the fastest runoff component, generated
excess and groundwater exfiltration. Positive trends in precipitation affected much less the
runoff components repartition, with the corresponding alterations totally masked or, even
outclassed, by the opposite effects due to an increase in the fraction of urban areas.
the considered urban areas spatial distribution and the rainfall characterization. The first
48
aspect is related to the crucial role that topography (e.g., mean slope) and soil type properties
(e.g., hydraulic conductivity) may have in controlling the different mechanisms of runoff
generation. With regard to the latter aspect, the results have confirmed that the increase in
frequency of rainstorm facilitates the saturation of the soil column and, thus, the production of
runoff components related to the “saturation from below” mechanism (i.e., saturation-excess,
perched return flow, groundwater exfiltration). Whereas, the increase in rainfall intensity
facilitates Hortonian runoff generation mechanisms, increasing the relative contribution of the
In some cases, the modifications in the rainfall characteristics may have a predominant role
with respect to the modifications in the mean annual rainfall total; for instance, no
significative differences in the mean annual evapotranspiration can be noticed between the
current scenarios and the CNB-U0 (Figure 6c), probably because the reduced rainfall intensity
facilitates the rainfall infiltration process, leading to soil moisture conditions, primary water
source for the evapotranspiration process, similar to that resulting for the Baseline and
The analyses of this study have also confirmed that, as it was often highlighted in other
past studies (e.g., Todd et al., 2007; Cuo et al., 2009; Wang and Hejazi, 2011), the processes
governing rainfall-runoff response can significantly change with spatial scale; as the basin
area increases, the modifications on both the total runoff and the singular runoff components
due to changes in climate and/or land use could be less evident than those induced by the
7 Conclusion
This paper contributed to an increase in the awareness on the complex interactions between
land systems and climate, through the assessment of their potential impacts on hydrology and
water resources under different scenarios. In particular, the study, which uses an advanced
49
hydrological model as a “virtual laboratory”, explored some of the hydrological changes that
could be induced by a wide range of extreme climate and urbanization trends, projected in
scenarios), they represent only a very little ensemble of the combinations between future
climate schemes and land use maps that is possible to hypothesize considering only the “very
likely” projections in various regions of the globe. Moreover, the investigated indicators of
hydrological changes are only some of the most representative in literature, and some other
important aspects, such as the possible effects on runoff extremes, have been totally neglected
in this study and represent further aims for future developments of the presented framework.
Despite the aforementioned limitations, the results here obtained could be extended, with
the necessary precautions, to most of the possible territorial contexts over the world.
Moreover, this study has proposed a rather simple modeling framework that can be used as a
benchmark for similar hydrological applications and easily transferred to any other territorial
context, resulting suitable also for backward analyses or future projections in real cases.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the numerous scientists who provided additional information from their studies,
and the three anonymous reviewers, editor-in-chief and associate editor for comments that
50
References
Amorocho, J., 1961. Discussion on predicting storm runoff on small experimental watershed
Arnone, E., Pumo, D., Viola, F., Noto, L. V., and La Loggia, G., 2013. Rainfall statistics
Arnone, E., Caracciolo, D., Noto, L.V., Preti, F., Bras, R.L., 2016. Modeling the hydrological
and mechanical effect of roots on shallow landslides. Water Resources Research, 52(11):
8590-8612; 10.1002/2015WR018227
Berghuijs, W.R., Woods, R.A., Hrachowitz, M., 2014. A precipitation shift from snow
towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow. Nat. Clim. Change, 4 (7): 583-586
Blenkinsop, S., Chan, S.C., Kendon, E. J., Roberts, N.M., Fowler, H.J., 2015. Temperature
Bronstert, A., Niehoff, D., Bürger, G., 2002. Effects of climate and land-use change on storm
runoff generation: present knowledge and modelling capabilities. Hydrol. Process., 16 (2):
509–529 - doi:10.1002/hyp.326
Burn, D.H., Mansour, R., Zhang, K., Whitfield, P.H., 2011. Trends and Variability in Extreme
Rainfall Events in British Columbia, Can. Water Resour. J., 36: 67–82 -
doi:10.4296/cwrj3601067
Caracciolo, D., Arnone, E., Noto, L.V., 2014. Influence of Spatial Precipitation Sampling on
51
Ceola, S., A. Montanari, D. Koutsoyannis. 2014. Toward a theoretical framework for
Chen, J., Li, X. and Zhang, M., 2005. Simulating the impacts of climate variation and land-
cover changes on basin hydrology: a case study of the Suomo Basin. Science in China Series
Cohen, J., 2003. Human population: The next half century. Science, 302, 1172-1175
Cuo, L., Lettenmaier, D.P., Alberti, M. and Richey, J.E., 2009. Effects of a century of land
cover and climate change on the hydrology of the Puget Sound basin. Hydrol. Process. 23:
907–33
Dialynas, Y.G., Bastola, S., Bras, R.L., Marin-Spiotta, E., Silver, W.L., Arnone, E., Noto,
L.V., 2016. Impact of hydrologically driven hillslope erosion and landslide occurrence on soil
doi: 10.1002/2016WR018925
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., Ogorman, P. A., and Maher, N., 2016. More
extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions, Nature Clim. Change, 6, 508-513,
10.1038/nclimate2941
Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V.Y., Caporali, E., 2011. Simulation of future climate scenarios with a
Fletcher, T.D., Andrieu, H., Hamel, P., 2013. Understanding, management and modelling of
urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters; a state of the art review. Adv.
52
Francipane, A., S. Fatichi, V. Y. Ivanov, and L. V. Noto (2015), Stochastic assessment of
doi:10.1002/2014JF003232
Gumindoga, W., Rientjes, T., Shekede, M.D., Rwasoke, D.T., Nhapi, I., Haile, A.T., 2014.
6 12544-12574; doi:10.3390/rs61212544
Hawley, R.J., Bledsoe, B.P., 2011. How do flow peaks and durations change in suburbanizing
Huang, H.J., Cheng, S.J., Wen, J.C., Lee, J.H., 2008. Effect of growing watershed
imperviousness on hydrograph parameters and peak discharge. Hydrol. Process., 22, 2075–
2085
IPCC. Climate change 2013. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to
the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013
Ivanov, V.Y., Vivoni, E.R., Bras, R.L., Entekhabi, D., 2004a. Catchment hydrologic response
with a fully-distributed triangulated irregular network model. Water Resour. Res., 40(11),
W11102
Ivanov, V.Y., Vivoni, E.R., Bras, R.L., Entekhabi, D., 2004b. Preserving high-resolution
Ivanov, V.Y., Bras, R.L., Curtis, D.C., 2007. A weather generator for hydrological, ecological,
53
Jacobson, C.R., 2011. Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of
doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.018
Liuzzo, L., Noto, L, Arnone, E., Caracciolo, D., La Loggia, G. 2015. Modifications in Water
Resources Availability Under Climate Changes: A Case Study in a Sicilian Basin. Water
Mascaro, G, Piras, M., Deidda, R., Vivoni, E.R., 2013. Distributed hydrologic modeling of a
17 (10): 4143-4158
McVicar, T.R., Roderick, M.L., Donohue, R.J., Li, L.T., Van Niel, T.G., Thomas, A., Grieser,
J., Jhajharia, D., Himri, Y., Mahowald, N.M., Mescherskaya, A.V., Kruger, A.C., Rehman, S.,
and Dinpashoh, Y., 2012. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H.H.G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L.L.,
Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., et al. "Panta Rhei - Everything
Flows": Change in hydrology and society - The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022.
Moreno, H.A., Gupta, H.V., White, D.D., Sampson, D.A., 2016. Modeling the distributed
effects of forest thinning on the long-term water balance and streamflow extremes for a semi-
Nazif, S., Tavakolifar, H., Eslamian, S., 2017. Climate Change Impact on Urban Water
Deficit, Ch. 5 in Handbook of Drought and Water Scarcity, Vol. 2: Environmental Impacts
and Analysis of Drought and Water Scarcity, Ed. by Eslamian S. and Eslamian F., Francis and
54
Noto, L., Ivanov, V., Bras, R., Vivoni, E. 2008. Effects of initialization on response of a fully-
Oni, S.K., Futter, M.N., Molot, L.A., Dillon, P.J., Crossman, J., 2014. Uncertainty
326-337
Praskievicz, S., and Chang, H., 2009. A review of hydrological modelling of basin-scale
climate change and urban development impacts. Progress in Physical Geography 33(5): 650-
671
Prokop, G., Jobstmann, H., Schonbauer, A., 2011. Overview on best practices for limiting soil
sealing and mitigating its effects in EU-27 (Environment Agency Austria), Technical Report -
Prosdocimi, I., Kjeldsen, T.R., Miller, J.D., 2015. Detection and attribution of urbanization
effect on flood extremes using nonstationary flood-frequency models. Water Resour. Res., 51
(6): 4244–4262
Pumo, D., Viola, F., Noto, L.V, 2010. Climate changes’ effects on vegetation water stress in
Pumo, D., Viola, F., La Loggia, G., Noto, L.V., 2014. Annual flow duration curves
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.024
Pumo, D., Viola, F., Noto, L.V., 2016a. Generation of natural runoff monthly series at
Pumo, D., Caracciolo, D., Viola, F., Noto, L.V., 2016b. Climate change effects on the
hydrological regime of small non-perennial river basins. Science of the Total Environment,
55
Pumo, D., Francipane, A., Lo Conti, F., Arnone, E., Bitonto, P., Viola, F., La Loggia, G.,
Noto, L.V., 2016c. The SESAMO early warning system for rainfall-triggered landslides.
Pumo D., Lo Conti, F., Viola F., Noto L.V., 2017. An automatic tool for reconstructing
Salvadore, E., Bronders, J., Batelaan, O., 2015. Hydrological modelling of urbanized
catchments: a review and future directions. J. Hydrol., 529 (Part 1): 62–81
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.028
Simmons, D.L., Reynolds, R.J., 1982. Effects of urbanization on base flow of selected south-
shore streams, Long Island, New York. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 18, 797–805
Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L.M., Van Lanen, H.A.J., Sauquet, E., Demuth,
S., Fendekova, M., J́odar, J., 2010. Streamflow trends in Europe: Evidence from a dataset of
Subedi, P., Subedi, K., Thapa, B., 2013. Application of a Hybrid Cellular Automaton –
Markov (CA – MARKOV), Model in Land – Use Change Prediction: A Case Study of Saddle
Creek Drainage Basin, Florida, Applied ecology and environmental sciences, 2013, 1 (6):
126-132
Tavakoli, M., De Smedt, F., Vansteenkiste, T., Willems, P., 2014. Impact of climate change
and urban development on extreme flows in the Grote Nete watershed, Belgium. Nat Hazards
Todd , C.E.D., Goss , A.M., Tripathy, D., Harbor, J.M., 2007. The Effects of Landscape
56
UN, 2008. United Nations expert group meeting on Population Distribution, Urbanization,
<http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/ documents/2529P01_UNPopDiv.pdf>
Viola, F., Francipane, A., Caracciolo, D., Pumo, D., La Loggia, G., Noto, L.V., 2016: Co-
Viola F., Caracciolo D., Forestieri, A., Pumo D., Noto L.V., 2017. Annual runoff assessment
in arid and semiarid Mediterranean watersheds under the Budyko’s framework. Hydrol.
Vivoni, E.R., Ivanov, V.Y., Bras, R.L., Entekhabi, D., 2005. On the effects of triangulated
terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response. Hydrol. Process., 19 (11): 2101-
2122
Wang, D., and Hejazi. M., 2011. Quantifying the relative contribution of the climate and
direct human impacts on mean annual streamflow in the contiguous United States. Water
Wang, D., and Alimohammadi, N., 2012. Responses of annual runoff, evaporation, and
storage change to climate variability at the watershed scale. Water Resour. Res., 48:W05546 -
doi:10.1029/2011WR011444
Ward, P.J., Renssen, H., Aerts, J.C.J.H., van Balen, R.T., Vandenberghe, J., 2008. Strong
increases in flood frequency and discharge of the River Meuse over the late Holocene:
impacts of long-term anthropogenic land use change and climate variability. Hydrol. Earth
Wasko, C., Sharma, A., 2015. Steeper temporal distribution of rain intensity at higher
Wasko, C., Sharma, A., 2017. Continuous rainfall generation for a warmer climate using
57
observed temperature sensitivities, J. Hydrol., 544: 575-590,
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.002.
Westra, S., Flower, H.J., Evans, J.P., Alexander, L.V., Berg, P., Johnson, F., Kendon, E.J.,
Lendrink, G., Roberts, N.M., 2014. Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-
Wild, M., 2009. Global dimming and brightening: a review. Journal of Geophysical Research-
Willett, K.M., Jones, P.D., Gillett, N.P., Thorne, P.W., 2008. Recent Changes in surface
Yang, L., Smith, J.A., Wright, D.B., Baeck, M.L., Villarini, G., Tian, F., Hu, H., 2013.
Yildiz, O., Barros, A.P., 2009. Evaluating spatial variability and scale effects on hydrologic
processes in a midsize river basin. Scientific Research and Essay Vol. 4 (4) pp. 217-225
58
Highlights:
2. Synthetic experiments with advanced models can explain some feedback mechanisms
4. Urbanization and its spatial evolution affect the runoff components partitioning
59