Professional Documents
Culture Documents
q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd International Endodontic Journal, 32, 99±102, 1999 99
Effectiveness of root canal irrigants Ayhan et al.
ability to act as an antiseptic (Jeansonne & White The microorganisms tested in this study were Sta-
1994, Barnard et al. 1996). phylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus
Spangberg et al. (1973) tested various potential salivarius, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escheria coli and
irrigants both in vivo and in vitro. They reported that Candida albicans. Microorganisms were subcultured
the most desirable solution was provided with the on both brain heart infusion agar (BHI) (Becton
irrigant which combined maximal antimicrobial effect Dickinson, Cockeysville, USA) in 5% sheep blood (for
with minimal toxicity. None of those tested met this Strep. salivarius and Strep. pyogenes) and BHI agar
requirement. They reported that 5.25% NaOCl was (for the others), These were stored for 24 h at 378C.
considerably stronger than necessary to kill the Several colonies from the plates were taken to BHI
bacteria commonly present in the root canal. However, broth (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) which was incubated
at this concentration, NaOCl was highly toxic and for 35 h at 378C. Their density was adjusted to
irritating. Furthermore, 0.5% NaOCl dissolved the McFarland 0.5 by adding 0.85% NaCl. BHI agar or
necrotic tissue but had no effect on Staphylococcus BHI agar with 5% sheep blood plate was swabbed
aureus. with the bacteria suspension. Paper discs (6 mm
The purpose of this study was to test the antimicro- diameter) were soaked with 15 mL of the chemother-
bial effects of some various root canal irrigants used apeutic test solutions and placed on the plates,
against selected microorganisms often found in infected which were incubated at 378C for 24 h. Zones of
root canals. inhibition were measured across the diameter with a
transparent ruler and recorded. The tests were
repeated five times for all strains. Statistical analysis
Materials and methods
was carried out using an analysis of variance, with
The six root canal irrigants used in this study were: Duncan's test of multiple comparisons. Significance
was determined at P < 0.05.
1 5.25% solution of NaOCl (Clorox, Oakland, CA,
USA)
2 0.5% solution of NaOCl (Labbco Inc., Houston,
Results
TX, USA)
3 2.0% solution chlorhexidine gluconate (Procter Table 1 shows the antimicrobial activity of tested
and Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA) materials.
4 Alcohol (21%) (Laboratoire SPAD, Quetigny, The results of the positive control (5.25% NaOCl)
France) showed that it was effective against all test microor-
5 Cresophene (paramonochlorophenol, 30%; ganisms with a substantial zone of inhibition. In
thymol, 5%; dexamethasone, 0.1%) (Septodont, contrast, the negative control (saline) was always
Saint-Maur, France) ineffective. Decreased concentrations of NaOCl (0.5%)
resulted in significantly decreased antimicrobial effects
6 Sterile physiological saline solution (Baxter,
(P < 0.05) compared with 5.25% NaOCl.
Deerfield, IL, USA).
In the present study, the group using alcohol
Physiological saline solution was used as the showed smaller zones of inhibition than chlorhexidine,
negative control and 5.25% NaOCl was used as the but the differences were not statistically significant
positive control. (P > 0.05).
Table 1 Antimicrobial activity of the tested materials (mean zone of inhibition in mm)
n 5.25% 0.5% Chlorhexidine Alcohol Cresophone Saline
NaOCl NaOCl gluconate
100 International Endodontic Journal, 32, 99±102, 1999 q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd
Ayhan et al. Effectiveness of root canal irrigants
Cresophene showed a significantly larger average as a root canal irrigant. The cytotoxicity of NaOCl is
zone of inhibition as compared with the other experi- reduced at lower concentrations, but dilution impairs
mental irrigants (P < 0.05). its tissue dissolution, canal debridement and antimi-
crobial properties (McComb & Smith 1975, Harrison
& Hand 1981). In the present study, the microbiolo-
Discussion
gical test results showed that 5.25% NaOCl was an
Antimicrobial activity of an in vitro environment effective agent against all the microorganisms tested.
depends upon the pH of the substrate in plates, However, when the NaOCl was diluted to a clinically
sensitivity of the drug, the amount of the bacteria relevant level (0.5%), it was much less effective.
inoculated, incubation time, and the metabolic activity From the results of previous investigations, it seemed
of the microorganisms. Furthermore, the antimicrobial reasonable to assume that chlorhexidine gluconate
properties of an agent are directly related to its ability solution might be an effective endodontic irrigant. It
to diffuse in agar. (Updengraff & Chaug 1977). On the was postulated that the chlorhexidine gluconate
other hand, the duration of effectiveness of the drug, solution, because of its ability to be adsorbed and
temperature, contamination and possible leakage of the released by dental tissues, would disinfect the tissues
agent into the mouth must be considered whilst and then, by sustained release of chlorhexidine
working in vivo (Demirtola & AlacËam 1977, Updengraff gluconate into the root canal, maintain a root canal
& Chaug 1977). The microorganisms used in this devoid of microorganisms. This greater reduction in
study were relevant because they are part of the microorganisms would therefore result in a higher
endodontic microbiological flora (Sundqvist 1992, success rate for root canal therapy (Parsons 1980,
Siqueira et al. 1997). Ringel et al. 1982).
The use of the best possible irrigant during chemo- Delany et al. (1982) tested chlorhexidine gluconate
mechanical preparation is of great importance. The (2.0%) in an in vitro study using extracted teeth. They
ideal irrigant should combine antimicrobial action and reported that it can be an effective antibacterial agent
a capacity to dissolve organic and inorganic remnants when used as an endodontic irrigant. They also
(Georgopoulou et al. 1994). recommended chlorhexidine as an intracanal inter-
Sodium hypochloride has been recommended as an appointment dressing. The results of the present study
irrigant solution in the treatment of infected root also indicated that 2.0% chlorhexidine is an effective
canals, because of its well-known bactericidal action irrigant for endodontic use.
(Nikolaus et al. 1988, Siqueira et al. 1997, TuÈrkuÈn & Although Yes, ilsoy et al. (1995) found that 11.6%
Cengiz 1997). Even though its antibacterial effects are alcohol was ineffective against most microorganisms
recognized, the exact mechanism of microbial killing is when used as an irrigant in root canals, the present
not well elucidated. When NaOCl is added to water, study showed that higher concentrations of alcohol
hypochlorous acid (HOCl), which contains active (21%) proved to be an active antimicrobial agent with
chlorine, a strong oxidizing agent, is formed. the test microorganisms used.
Substantial evidence suggests that chlorine exerts its Cresophene, which consists of powerful bactericides
antibacterial effect by the irreversible oxidation of -SH combined with a corticosteroid, has a number of
groups of essential enzymes, disrupting the metabolic properties which are particularly effective in the disin-
functions of the bacterial cell. Chlorine may also fecting of root canals. The percentage of paramono-
combine with cytoplasmic components to form N- chlorophenol in cresophene is 30±45%. In vitro and in
chloro compounds, toxic complexes which destroy the vivo studies showed that it is effective against many mi-
microorganism. However, the first contact oxidation croorganisms found in infected root canals (Harrison &
reactions of chlorine with bacteria may lead to the Madonia 1971, Taylor et al. 1976). Another agent,
rapid killing of bacterial cells even prior to the timol, found in cresophene is an antimicrobial and
formation of N-chloro compounds in the cytoplasm antifungal agent. It has been used in endodontic
(Siqueira et al. 1997). treatments combined with other antiseptics (Demirtola
BystroÈm et al. (1983) compared the antimicrobial 1977).
effects of irrigation on canal flora with 0.5% NaOCl Although cresophene was found to be an alternative
and saline solution (0.9% sodium chlorite). They irrigant, one still has to be cautious because of the
found that 0.5% NaOCl solution showed a greater cytotoxic, and possible carcinogenic, mutagenic and
antimicrobial effect than saline solution when used teratogenic properties of this material.
q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd International Endodontic Journal, 32, 99±102, 1999 101
Effectiveness of root canal irrigants Ayhan et al.
102 International Endodontic Journal, 32, 99±102, 1999 q 1999 Blackwell Science Ltd