Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 1

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Data Set WORK.NEW

Response Variable highincome

Number of Response Levels 2

Model binary logit

Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring

Number of Observations Read 213

Number of Observations Used 213

Response Profile

Ordered Total
Value highincome Frequency

1 1 96

2 0 117

Probability modeled is highincome=1.

Model Convergence Status

Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Model Fit Statistics

Intercept
Intercept and
Criterion Only Covariates

AIC 295.207 286.952

SC 298.568 293.675

-2 Log L 293.207 282.952

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0

Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq

Likelihood Ratio 10.2545 1 0.0014

Score 10.1784 1 0.0014

Wald 10.0057 1 0.0016

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Standard Wald
Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq

Intercept 1 -0.6390 0.2005 10.1575 0.0014

democracy2 1 0.8928 0.2823 10.0057 0.0016

 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 2

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Odds Ratio Estimates

Point 95% Wald

Effect Estimate Confidence Limits

democracy2 2.442 1.404 4.246

Association of Predicted Probabilities and

Observed Responses

Percent Concordant 37.2 Somers' D 0.220

Percent Discordant 15.2 Gamma 0.419

Percent Tied 47.6 Tau-a 0.109

Pairs 11232 c 0.610

 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 3

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Data Set WORK.NEW

Response Variable highincome

Number of Response Levels 2

Model binary logit

Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring

Number of Observations Read 213

Number of Observations Used 213

Response Profile

Ordered Total
Value highincome Frequency

1 1 96

2 0 117

Probability modeled is highincome=1.

Model Convergence Status

Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Model Fit Statistics

Intercept
Intercept and
Criterion Only Covariates

AIC 295.207 292.026

SC 298.568 298.748

-2 Log L 293.207 288.026

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0

Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq

Likelihood Ratio 5.1813 1 0.0228

Score 5.1803 1 0.0228

Wald 5.1285 1 0.0235

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Standard Wald
Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq

Intercept 1 -0.4502 0.1792 6.3124 0.0120

largenumberofarmedfo 1 0.6459 0.2852 5.1285 0.0235

 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 4

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Odds Ratio Estimates

Point 95% Wald

Effect Estimate Confidence Limits

largenumberofarmedfo 1.908 1.091 3.337

Association of Predicted Probabilities and

Observed Responses

Percent Concordant 32.1 Somers' D 0.153

Percent Discordant 16.8 Gamma 0.312

Percent Tied 51.1 Tau-a 0.076

Pairs 11232 c 0.576

 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 5

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Model Information

Data Set WORK.NEW

Response Variable highincome

Number of Response Levels 2

Model binary logit

Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring

Number of Observations Read 213

Number of Observations Used 213

Response Profile

Ordered Total
Value highincome Frequency

1 1 96

2 0 117

Probability modeled is highincome=1.

Model Convergence Status

Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.

Model Fit Statistics

Intercept
Intercept and
Criterion Only Covariates

AIC 295.207 284.704

SC 298.568 294.788

-2 Log L 293.207 278.704

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0

Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq

Likelihood Ratio 14.5026 2 0.0007

Score 14.2400 2 0.0008

Wald 13.6355 2 0.0011

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Standard Wald
Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq

Intercept 1 -0.8576 0.2312 13.7549 0.0002

democracy2 1 0.8615 0.2852 9.1258 0.0025

largenumberofarmedfo 1 0.5992 0.2918 4.2167 0.0400

 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 02:40:22 6

The LOGISTIC Procedure

Odds Ratio Estimates

Point 95% Wald

Effect Estimate Confidence Limits

democracy2 2.367 1.353 4.139

largenumberofarmedfo 1.821 1.028 3.225

Association of Predicted Probabilities and

Observed Responses

Percent Concordant 52.0 Somers' D 0.285

Percent Discordant 23.6 Gamma 0.376

Percent Tied 24.4 Tau-a 0.142

Pairs 11232 c 0.642