Washington consensus – definition and criticism | Economics Help http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consen...

Navigation

Follow @economicshelp
RSS |

You are here: Home > Economics help blog > Washington consensus – definition and criticism

by Tejvan Pettinger on April 25, 2013 in economics

The Washington Consensus refers to a set of broadly free market economic ideas, supported by prominent economists
and international organisations, such as the IMF, the World Bank, the EU and the US.

Essentially, the Washington consensus advocates, free trade, floating exchange rates, free markets and macroeconomic
stability.

The ten principles originally stated by John Williamson in 1989, includes ten sets of relatively specific policy
recommendations.

1. Low government borrowing. Avoidance of large fiscal deficits relative to GDP;

2. Redirection of public spending from subsidies (“especially indiscriminate subsidies”) toward broad-based provision of key pro-growth,
pro-poor services like primary education, primary health care and infrastructure investment;
3. Tax reform, broadening the tax base and adopting moderate marginal tax rates;
4. Interest rates that are market determined and positive (but moderate) in real terms;
5. Competitive exchange rates;
6. Trade liberalization: liberalization of imports, with particular emphasis on elimination of quantitative restrictions (licensing, etc.); any trade
protection to be provided by low and relatively uniform tariffs;
7. Liberalization of inward foreign direct investment;
8. Privatization of state enterprises;
9. Deregulation: abolition of regulations that impede market entry or restrict competition, except for those justified on safety, environmental
and consumer protection grounds, and prudential oversight of financial institutions;
10. Legal security for property rights.

The Washington consensus was important for determining policy towards economic development in Latin America, South
East Asia and other countries. Some implications of the Washington consensus.

Implications of Washington Consensus

Support of free trade through WTO and NAFTA – North Atlantic Free Trade association reduce tariff barriers.
IMF bailouts tended to involve free market reforms as a condition of receiving money.
Belief in free trade suggests countries, should specialise in goods / services where they have a comparative advantage. This may mean
developing economies need to stick with producing primary products.

Criticisms / Breakdown of the Washington Consensus

1. Strategic trade theory. Some economists argue that free trade is not always in the best interest of developing
economies. A strict adoption of free trade and comparative advantage can leave developing economies producing low
income growth and volatile priced primary products. If countries promoted new industries, it may require both selective
tariffs on cheap imports and also government subsidies. For example, the Brazilian government’s support and
development of Embraer, helped Brazil become successful in airline manufacturing.

2. Low government borrowing is not always appropriate. Implementing fiscal rules can cause unnecessary economic
hardship, if the government cuts spending at inappropriate timing. For example, fiscal consolidation during the great
recession has caused low growth rates, and a failure to reduce debt to GDP ratios. If governments are pressured to cut
spending it can also cause welfare support programmes to be hit, increasing poverty. However, in the long term, most
economists would suggest it is prudent to reduce structural borrowing to manageable levels.

3. The Chinese approach. An interesting development in recent years is that Chinese firms have invested substantial
sums in developing economies, such as Africa and Latin America. An FT report, suggests China has lent $110 bn to
developing countries in past two years – more than the World Bank. The interesting thing about the Chinese approach is
that it involves substantial investment in infrastructure and public sector investment – showing that for economic
development, an interventionist approach can have a bigger return than leaving it to free markets.

4. Problems of privatisation. Privatisation has the capacity to increase efficiency and improve the quality of the product /
service. However, for key public sector industries, privatisation may mean companies ignore wider social objectives. For
example, in the 1990s, under World Bank pressure, Bolivia privatised its water industry. But, this led to water supplies

1 of 4 3/31/2015 1:06 PM
Washington consensus – definition and criticism | Economics Help http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consen...

being cut off from the poorest members of society. (politics of water in Bolivia at the Nation)

5. Mis-interpretation. The second point about redirecting of public spending towards public sector initiatives like primary
education, primary health care and infrastructure investment, has often been ignored. Instead the ‘Washington Consensus’
has come to refer to more market oriented policies, which have focused on less government intervention.

6. The macro-economic crisis of Latin America in 1980s and South East Asian crisis in 1990s, made this free market
policies unpopular in the countries where they were implemented. (see: Criticisms of IMF)

7. Credit crisis and instability of free markets. The credit crisis beginning in 2007 has illustrated the potential for free
markets to create instability and high unemployment. Financial deregulation has created potential for financial instability.

In defence of the Washington consensus

The 10 principles of the Washington consensus all have considerable economic validity. Broadening the tax base, investment in
education, sustainable government borrowing, flexible exchange rates e.t.c can all help improve economic welfare Under certain
situations, privatisation and increased competition can have potential benefits. Most economists would support the notion that free trade
has potential benefits.
It’s always easy to criticise when things go wrong. When South East Asian economies were in great difficulties in the 1990s, it is likely
that any policies would be unpopular. When you have a crisis there tends to be no easy way out.
The problems of the EU are related to difficulties of managing a single currency. A return to competitive exchange rates would help the
crisis to be overcome more easily.
The problem with any broad set of economic principles is that it always depends how and when they are implemented. For example,
generally free trade is good. It’s generally desirable to have lower tariffs and encourage international trade. However, that doesn’t
necessarily mean there isn’t room for targeted economic diversification; some developing economies may benefit from limited trade
protectionism to develop new industries. But, even this depends on how it is implemented. If African countries, tried to use tariffs to
develop a motor industry, it would probably lead to government failure because the infrastructure isn’t there to support a new motor
industry. However, if there was some support to develop primary product processing within the country, it is more likely to be successful.
With privatisation it depends what you privatise. In the UK, the privatisation of BT was relatively uncontroversial, but the privatisation of
British rail was much more controversial. The difference here is that railways are a natural monopoly and have social benefits.
An important point is that an economic policy may have sound justification, but it might not be universally applicable,
e.g. free trade. Free trade can tend to give greater benefit to developed economies than developing. But, at the same
time, developing countries would benefit if the developed world (EU and US) actually cut agricultural tariffs.

Conclusion

The Washington consensus has diverged somewhat from the original intention of John Williamson. Despite the failings of
the free market, there is still merit in considering each of the 10 principles. However, there needs to be greater
discrimination and less blanket implementation. The privatisation of state owned car industry may be good, but water
supplies may not. Perhaps the most interesting development is the rise of the Chinese and Indian economies. In particular,
Chinese investment is playing a considerable role in enabling economic development within developing economies. The
Washington consensus is partly tied to the strength of the US economy. But, the US economy is likely to decline in relative
terms. Perhaps in a few decades we will be talking about the ‘Chinese consensus’ – whatever that may turn out to be.

Facebook

The impact of economic booms on competitiveness Economic Growth UK

Comments are closed.

Economics Help Revision (e-books)

2 of 4 3/31/2015 1:06 PM
Washington consensus – definition and criticism | Economics Help http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consen...

Other items from Economics Help.org Shop

Tags

a-level amazon austerity balance of payments banks benefits bonds bond yields business deflation economic
growth economics elasticity environment euro euro crisis europe exchange rates finance forecasts graphs house prices
housing india inequality interest rates investment italy labour markets monetary policy money supply quantitative easing
recession recovery savings stats stock market tax uk debt unemployment us economy
wages

Recommended Reading

Economic Books - at Amazon.co.uk

Economic Books - at Amazon.com

Economics Help blog by email

Enter your email address for daily blogs:

Recent Posts

Is zero inflation a good thing?

UK Inflation Rate and Graphs
Shortage of Lorry Drivers
Fall in Euro
Was Britain better off in 1914?

Selected Posts

Economic History
Causes of Wall Street Crash 1929
Causes of Great Depression
UK economy in 1920s
UK Economy of 1970s
UK Economy - 1980s
Keynesian Economics

Popular posts
Impact of Immigration on UK economy
The problem of printing money
The Importance of Economics
Understanding Exchange Rates
Top 10 reasons for studying economics

Contact
Ask Question

Privacy Policy and Cookies

3 of 4 3/31/2015 1:06 PM
Washington consensus – definition and criticism | Economics Help http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consen...

Tejvan R Pettinger

Tejvan studied PPE at LMH, Oxford University and works as an economics teacher and writer.

Read More

This site uses cookies More info

4 of 4 3/31/2015 1:06 PM