FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MEC332

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA, CAW. P. PINANG, MECHANICAL ENG. DESIGN

JLN PERMATANG PAUH, 13500 P. PINANG.

PROTOTYPE EVALUATION FORM

GROUP : PEM1105___
TEAM NAME :

No Team Member Student No

1
2
3
4
5
6

Instruction: Please give a score in the scale of 0 to 10 for each assessment criteria

Level Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

Scale 0-4 5-6 7-8 9 - 10

No CO-PO Assessment Criteria Weightage Score Total

Performance / Functionality / Quality
 Product meets design objectives
[CO5:PO7}  Product performs all its intended functions
1 3.5
{P5}  Product works efficiently and effectively
 The product is of reasonable quality / good
workmanship
Manufacturing Aspects
[CO3:PO3]  Simplicity (less number of parts used)
2 3.0
{P4}  Ease of operation (assembly and disassembly)
 Easy overall maintenance and storage
Maintainability
[CO3:PO3]  Lifespan (long lasting)
3 2.0
{P4}  Reliability, durability, and portability
 Fewer repairs and easy to repair when needed
Health, Safety & Risk issues
[CO4:PO8]  Ergonomics - safe for operators / humans
4 0.5
{P3}  Sustainability (environmental or eco-friendly)
 Low / no contamination
Innovation & Commercialization
[CO4:PO8]  Minimum-cost-of-materials and labor used
5 0.5
{P3}  Affordable to produce and reasonable to customer
 Low operational and maintenance cost
Aesthetical Values
[CO5:PO7}
6  Appealed-to-customer value. 0.5
{P5}
 Good first impression, pleasing appearance, etc.

Assessed by

Signature: Name: Date: