Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract:
In most sensor network the nodes are static . Subject to changes because of disruptions in wireless
communication , transmission power changes, loss of synchronization between neighboring nodes.Process
we call continuous neighbor discovery during sensor network initialization and continuous neighbor
discovery.
I. INTRODUCTION
A sensor network may contain a huge Long-term process.
number of simple sensor nodes that are Greater expense of energy than
developed at some inspected site. required in our scheme.
The sensor nodes act as routers ,
forwarding messages from one of their III. PROPOSED SYSTEM
neighbors to another.
Two neighboring sensors to communicate, Sensor network initialization and
both must be in active node. continuous neighbor discovery. We focus on
Sensor networks with low and irregular the latter and view it as a joint task of all the
traffic , a special neighbor discovery nodes in every connected segment.
schemes should be used. Sensor employs a simple protocol in a
coordinate effort reduce power .
II. EXISTING SYSTEM The time required to detect hidden sensors.
Such a case , the sensor cannot communicate Detect their immediate neighbors.
with the gateway and is therefore very Message does not collide with
limited in performing its tasks. another.
Every node discovers its hidden
DISADVANTAGES OFEXISTING neighbors independently.
SYSTEM Detect their immediate neighbors.
In networks with continuously heavy Message does not collide with
traffic. another.
REFERENCES
1. RFC 1122, Requirements for Internet
VI. MODULES Hosts – Communication Layers, Layers R.
Braden (ed.), October 1989.
Client – Server 2. RFC 1123, Requirements for Internet
Detecting all hidden links Inside a Hosts – Application and Support,
Support R.
segment Braden (ed.), October 1989
Detecting all hidden links Outside a 3. "The DoD Internet Architecture Model",
Model"
segment Vinton G. Cerf and Edward
Neighbor Discovery Model Cain, Computer Networks,
Networks 7 (1983),
CLIENT – SERVER North-Holland, pp. 307-318
318
Client – Server computing is distributed 4. [1],, Vinton G. Cerf and Robert E.
access. Kahn, A Protocol for Packet Network
Server accepts requests for data from client Intercommunication,, 5 (1974)
and returns the result to the client. 5. Internet Hall of Fame
clients and servers communicate over a 6. [2], Jon Postel, Comments on Internet
computer network on separate hardware. Protocol and TCP,, (1977), Section
3.3.3.2
7. [3],, Norman Abramson, The Aloha
System - Another alternative for
computer communications
mmunications, (1970)
ISSN: 2395-1303
1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 94
International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 3 Issue 1, Jan – Feb 2017
ACKNOWLEDGMENT